Ramola Dharmaraj has done it again: she has dragged the name of Barbara Hartwell into yet another piece of so-called “truth journalism”, once again addressing issues which have absolutely nothing to do with me.
And, as usual, falsely lumping my name in with a number of individuals. Individuals I do not know. Individuals with whom I have never had any contact or interaction whatsoever. Individuals who have absolutely nothing to do with my work, or with my personal or professional background.
The only commonality that I can see is that a few of these individuals are former intelligence professionals, which, in itself, is meaningless. So what?
As in any profession, there are all kinds of people. The good, the bad and the ugly. The honorable and the dishonorable. The truthful and the liars. The defenders of individual liberty and the leftist totalitarians. Those who pursue justice and those who believe the ends justify the means. Those who act on principle and those whose actions are self-serving...and on and on it goes...
The others (some of whom I had never heard of) are completely irrelevant. There are no commonalities whatsoever.
And once again, I find it necessary to expose her misguided and unscrupulous actions for what they are, and to refute her defamatory falsehoods against me.
Here is the latest from Ramola Dharmaraj:
Not Havana Syndrome, Not “Mental Illness,” “Star Wars” Might Be Closer to the Truth: Of Obvious DEWs & Neuro Strikes: A Whistleblower Racket
https://everydayconcerned.net/2023/11/16/not-havana-syndrome-not-mental-illness-star-wars-might-be-closer-to-the-truth-of-obvious-dews-neuro-strikes-a-whistleblower-racket/
Ramola Dharmaraj aka Ramola D. Among her oft-repeated and resounding claims about herself, abounding on her website and on a variety of social media platforms are the following:
"Truth Journalist"
Regarding certain subject matter:
"The top journalist"
"The only journalist"
"The one lone journalist"
"The primary journalist"
"The lone journalist"
And this one takes the cake!:
"The World’s Pre-Eminent Journalist Exposing MK ULTRA, DEW, and Neurotech Classified Mil/Intel Crimes"
"Illuminator"
"Human Rights Attorney"
"Whistleblower"
"Whistleblower-journalist"
"Ambassador to Humanity"
In my considered professional opinion, based on decades of experience, in psychological profiling and as a CIA whistleblower, none of these claims are true. Not a one. Very simply, they are not based on facts. She has presented no evidence whatsoever to substantiate even one of them.
She lacks the credentials, the experience, the knowledge and the background. With such preposterous boasting, she only shows herself to be a pretentious poseur, an amateur wannabe, an impostor, an interloper, way out of line, way off base, and way out of her league.
Does she really think no one will notice, that if she keeps repeating these bogus promotions, they will be accepted as “truth”, the so-called “Truth Journalism” she continually touts?
And this list is only a small sample, and which leaves out her other sensationalist claims of being “The Prime Subject” of various operations (which are, in fact, nonexistent), or “the Prime Victim” in the entire world, of Satanic Ritual Abuse. This last is especially ridiculous, as it can be seen from her writings that she does not even know what “satanic ritual abuse” actually is.
She has never investigated it, and I can guarantee, was never a “victim” of any such thing, much less “the Prime Victim”. She has either fabricated these stories and/or has delusions which she herself believes. At this point, I no longer care why she is making such preposterous claims. I only care that her claims are patently false and that others may be harmed by believing them.
Having conducted more than forty years of actual investigations on the subject of satanism and satanic ritual abuse, as well as gathering direct knowledge and evidence by interviewing and counseling victims (as a Christian minister and psychoanalyst), and as a journalist (print, radio and TV producer/host) exposing these crimes, I do know exactly what I am talking about. Whereas, many others (including Ramola D) do not. Yet they keep babbling away, jockeying for position and squabbling among themselves, in their vain efforts to gain public acclaim.
But before moving on, let's not forget her claims of armies of assailants deployed against her, by FBI, CIA, DOD, US Air Force, Mossad, “Khazarian mafia” etc. etc.
The assaults by air, drone strikes, helicopters, fighter jets, all hell-bent on “life takedown” (as she calls it) of Ramola D.
Anyone may easily find these articles on her website, and see for themselves her own words, how she promotes these claims as if they were true, based on fact. But which are most certainly not true. And again, she presents no facts which can be verified.
She accuses her neighbors of deploying directed-energy weapons against her, and of being “assassins”. Some are accused of being CIA (or other government agencies). She even accuses the mailman of being CIA! Yet she produces no evidence whatsoever.
She claims that “every person” in the world should be paying attention to her. What she has to say is SO IMPORTANT. That “all” journalists in the world should be coming to her aid and “heeding her cries”. It is “The Story of the Century”, she proclaims. The drama of it all!
She claims that her “life is in extreme danger”.
And yet, there she is, still very much alive, still sitting behind her computer, still fabricating (and/or by delusional imagining) utterly preposterous nonsense, still posting on social media.
And now, to the one subject of real concern to me... she is still making false accusations, still promoting outrageous lies against Barbara Hartwell, still exploiting my name for her own self-serving agenda.
Still at it, after all this time. I have had no contact with her since mid-2021, when I broke off my association with her due to her gossip and meddling in my business. I never had any intention of making her indiscretions public, but rather tried to walk quietly away.
Still at it, after she has been warned (first privately, then later, after I broke off contact with her, publicly), to stop using my name, to stop misrepresenting me by dragging my name into her fictional scenarios, to stop the meddling and the gossip, to stop sticking her nose where it does not belong.
To stop sending defamatory e-mails, filled with false accusations, to my (thanks to her, now former) friends behind my back. I warned that there would be consequences, as there always are, for such unscrupulous actions.
But there is a reason I find it necessary to publish this additional report. The reason is that, as always, she continues to disregard my warnings and to exploit and defame my good name, now with new false and totally baseless accusations.
This is becoming obsessive. She simply will not stop. I have never at any time been a participant in the social media culture in which she operates. I have never been involved in any way with the so-called “targeted individuals” she promotes, or their “community”.
I am entirely independent in my professional work. I do not seek professional or social interaction with others, nor do I seek publicity from anyone.
I am a fierce defender of my privacy. My life is not an open book for all and sundry to peruse. I mind my own business and have every right to expect others to respect my boundaries.
But as this utterly intrusive aggressor has proved by her actions, she has no respect whatsoever for the privacy or personal boundaries of others.
What she hopes to accomplish by this onslaught of invasions and false claims against me I do not know, nor do I care.
What I do know is that I will not allow her to get away with this unconscionable behavior; as I stated in previous reports, I will continue to expose her, to refute her falsehoods, and to warn others.
In perusing her various articles, which include details of her CV, there appear at least two indicators of her areas of interest: 1) She is a writer of fiction and 2) She holds an academic degree (MBA) in “marketing”.
Had my name not been placed in the cross-hairs of this ambitious, aggressive self-promoter, I might not have bothered to conduct my own analysis of what this might mean, but it certainly deserves consideration.
In relation to this, I have noticed, during my long career in journalism, that there tends to be a commonality among those journalists who are also fiction writers. It is this: They blend fictional scenarios into what they claim is factual material. They embellish, they add speculation and fantasies spawned by their own subjective imagination.
This does not bode well for the truth on any subject, whatever it may be. Articles which they present as fact-based are in actuality tainted with fictional content, thus negating their truthfulness and accuracy.
From my observations and analysis of the content of her print journalism, this is what I see. And I have a serious problem: Ramola Dharmaraj continues to drag my name into what appear to be her paranoid fantasies of persecution. And I will not stand for it!
Here, once again, is the title of the article in which my name has been vilified and my character assassinated.
Not Havana Syndrome, Not “Mental Illness,” “Star Wars” Might Be Closer to the Truth: Of Obvious DEWs & Neuro Strikes: A Whistleblower Racket
Here, some excerpts and my comments.
Former CIA John Kiriakou was chosen as one of her targets for this piece. He is one of many intelligence professionals that she aggressively pursued, trying to get an interview. From my observations, and from what she publicly stated in her articles, most of these individuals ignored her approaches, or declined her requests for interviews.
She complained repeatedly that she was being ignored and it was clear that she was extremely displeased that she was dismissed by so many people as being of no particular importance.
Her response to their non-response was usually to criticize them, in some cases to make accusations against them, based on nothing, as far as I could see, but her being miffed that she was ignored.
Clearly, she does not take rejection as anything but a grievous personal affront. She has made it clear that she thinks she is far too important to everyone on the face of the earth to be ignored, found to be inconsequential.
Here, she waxes malicious about Kiriakou, accusing him of the old standby: he must still be CIA. And here is where she drags my name into the mix, with the same basic accusation, though I do not know John Kiriakou, have never had any contact with him, nor was involved at any time in the same operations. But, not to worry, she won't ever let the facts get in the way of her sour grapes malice against anyone who dares to ignore her.
Ramola D Re John Kiriakou:
"He
does, however, do a good job playing Still-a-Spokesperson-for-the-CIA
despite his long stint as
In-the-Public-Eye-as-a-Righteous-Whistleblower, much like Edward
Snowden, Bill Binney, and so many others. The CIA, I understand, is
an exacting employer, which doesn’t quite let its whistleblowers
go, as CIA
Whistleblower Barbara Hartwell has recently demonstrated, with a
new batch of repeat-storytelling she may have been paid to storytell:
my newer understanding of how Intelligence agencies operate is
touched on here:"
"This writer has increasingly been made aware over the years of the extreme strangeness of the so-called “Intelligence Community” in the USA through her interactions with and journalistic coverage of whistleblowers from various prestigiously-named agencies which apparently all seem to actually be filled with people idly entertaining themselves and others with various covers, stories, and lies."
—Regarding Barbara Hartwell, CIA Whistleblower | June 13, 2023
[The above filled with many idiotic false accusations, as usual.]
In point of fact, I have “demonstrated” nothing of the kind. I have only demonstrated my righteous outrage and disgust with this aggressive interloper, this gate-crashing intelligence groupie posing as the protagonist of “The Story of the Century” (in her own words).
Now, to add further gross insult to injury, she accuses me of being paid by CIA. Paid to “storytell”.
But here's a question: why in the world would anyone from CIA spend a red cent on payments to one of their former agents (even if they were willing) to write “stories” about an inconsequential fiction writer with delusions of her own importance, such that she believes anyone from the intelligence community would waste a moment's thought on the likes of her.
Answer: They wouldn't. The thought is absurd. They haven't. And they never will. Her delusions of grandeur are getting more crazy as time passes.
Another question: why does she think she is being ignored by the former intelligence professionals she aggressively pursues? Maybe there's a clue here.
Now, more insults to Kiriakou:
“...I wrote back, seeking to educate him further...”
So she sends unsolicited advice (the MO of such busybodies), thinking he needs to be “educated” by the likes of her. And when he disagrees with her, or ignores her, she acts out by accusing him (as she accuses so many others, including Barbara Hartwell) of being CIA. How stupid can she get?
Another excerpt:
"Merely asking, what is it about Whistleblowers from the Government agencies, really? isn’t enough anymore. Clearly they are a very special race, class, or species, unto themselves–and as explained to us once, many years ago, of the way terrorists apparently behave, of whom Intelligence agents seem to be the obverse half, they operate separately sometimes, in cells and conclaves. Yet none, it appears, are in actuality acting independently: a tragedy or a regrettable fact, either way you look at it."
Now, still in sour grapes mode, she accuses all whistleblowers from government agencies of behaving like terrorists, and claims that “none” are acting independently. This is pure hogwash.
How would she know? She is clueless as ever, clutching at straws as she drowns in her own delusions of being too important to ignore.
The name of Barbara Hartwell has been falsely thrown into the mix with “all” others, as if there were no individuals, only some amorphous conglomerate, as she pretentiously claims here:
"Those who occupy positions in the Spotlight are inevitably Supported, or, more accurately, brought to where they are by intent; there are no “accidental” whistleblowers or activists or journalists permitted to rise to the fore at any time, they are all part of a well-oiled mechanism both bolstering extant Covert agencies and endless Covert Crime, or in other words: The CIA is/in the Whistleblower and the Whistleblower is/in the CIA. As also the NSA, probably–and yes I’ve had some first-hand experience there too, as also with (mysterious) European Royalty/MI5/Swiss Intel/BND–and I’ll have to examine other aspects of this “Government” scenario another time."
She does not know what the hell she is talking about. In any case, none of this applies to me. First of all, I do not occupy a position in any “Spotlight”. I do not seek publicity and most of what has come my way has been foisted on me, either by hangers-on trying to exploit my name, or by my enemies in the government, seeking to discredit me. Their decades-long defamation campaign is real, actual retaliation against a legitimate whistleblower, which she does not have the discernment to recognize.
Furthermore, she has no idea what I may have been involved in, or what I may have done to expose or put certain individuals or operations out of business.
She wouldn't know because very little of what I have done has ever been made public, for my own reasons, including that I am very scrupulous about putting my family, my friends, my colleagues at risk of harm, or for that matter, anyone who might be seen only as collateral damage. But they all matter to me, every single one. I would risk my life to protect the innocent, to defend Liberty, and to see justice served.
Her gross insults against my honor will never change that; she only shows her own lack of integrity by making such false accusations and casting out such grievous provocations.
Here, my name is thrown in again with this:
"My requests in 2020 for an interview with Bill Binney and Kirk Wiebe which went unanswered at the time were thwarted, I was given to understand later, by Katherine Horton engaging in rather obvious defamation and slander, which NSA Whistleblower Kirk Wiebe alerted me to, as reported here earlier:"
As for this article, some of it is accurate in terms of the e-mail sent by Katherine Horton to Bill Binney, making false claims that Barbara Hartwell is a CIA agent, and issuing a “warning”.
I do not know Katherine Horton. She is a foreign criminal provocateur (now wife of Bill Binney), not intelligence, as claimed by Ramola. Horton had also made many other false public accusations against Barbara Hartwell, that I am a “liar”, that I am a “bitch”, that I am a “gangstalker”, on her videos and on her disinfo website, called STOP 007.
I exposed her (as always, by citing her own words) as a criminal who was inciting violence and terrorism and who was soliciting the murder of various intelligence agents, including Gina Haspel, by putting a “bullet in the brain”.
But I do not know Binney, nor ever had any interest in contacting him, nor any reason to do so.
Another character mentioned in Ramola's article is Karen Melton Stewart, former NSA, a former friend of Ramola, as was Katherine Horton.
I do not know Karen Stewart, nor ever had any interest in contacting her, nor any reason to do so.
Stewart too accuses me of being CIA and went on a rampage of defamation, along with some of her accomplices, posting images of demons in connection with my name and claiming that I am a satanist.
So I guess Ramola is in good company, with kindred spirits, in accusing me of being CIA, paid to “tell stories” against her.
And, one more thing, before I forget. The "secret slander" of which she accuses Katherine Horton is exactly what she did to me, by sending her defamatory e-mails, making false accusations against me, to two of my friends. Behind my back, that is. What a hypocrite and how shameful.
And finally this:
"It’s true, I’ve lost faith in Whistleblowers, and in human rights activists who have pursued prominence as leaders while disappearing and discrediting others, engaging in both overt and subtle actions of COINTELPRO. “Handling” and “Containment” come to mind when I look back at conversations and communications, sudden apprisings of Public Comment deadlines at Health agencies, slow actions and exhortations to non-action. CIA and NSA whistleblowers–looking back at a long list of them (many of whom can be seen listed as Sam Adams awardees here)–seem to be artifacts of the CIA and NSA, primed to “reveal” while in fact aiding to Conceal."
None of what is written above has anything whatsoever to do with me, nor applies to me. I have never “pursued prominence” as a leader, or as anything else. I am a true recluse, not a team player, not seeking interaction with others, but entirely independent in my work.
There was no reason whatsoever for Ramola Dharmaraj to drag my name into yet another of her pretentious hit pieces, masquerading as “truth journalism”.
There is not, nor ever has been, any connection whatsoever with “Havana Syndrome”, nor with “Mental Illness,” nor “Star Wars”, nor with any “Whistleblower Racket”, not to do with Barbara Hartwell.
So why?
The answer is simple, and stated many times before:
Ramola Dharmaraj has no legitimate complaints against me. She has no facts on which to base her false accusations, her gross insults against my honor. She has no evidence and no credible witnesses. She has nothing at all, nor can she cite as much as one actual fact, which could possibly discredit me.
So, like others of her ilk, she fabricates preposterous stories. But unlike her malicious fantasies about me, that CIA is paying me to “tell stories”, nobody would be so foolish as to pay her a wooden nickel for such a task.
Her total lack of credibility speaks loudly and clearly for itself, in every word she writes.
So much for a marketing scheme to promote the self-aggrandizing fantasies of a fiction writer, at the expense of at least one legitimate CIA whistleblower.
Vanity, thy name is Ramola.
Barbara Hartwell
Living in Dire Poverty
NOT PAID BY CIA
November
19, 2023
RELATED REPORTS
YELLOW JOURNALISM: Exposing & Refuting False Information & Defamation Against Barbara Hartwell by Ramola D aka Dharmaraj
http://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2023/10/yellow-journalism-exposing-refuting.html
CYBERSTALKING,
HARASSMENT & DEFAMATION BY RAMOLA D/DHARMARAJ
http://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2023/09/cyberstalking-harassment-defamation-by.html
FLAGRANT IDIOCY OF ADDITIONAL FALSE ACCUSATIONS AGAINST BARBARA HARTWELL BY RAMOLA D/ DHARMARAJ: “GHOST WRITER” HAS TAKEN OVER BARBARA HARTWELL VS. CIA
https://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2023/08/flagrant-idiocy-of-additional-false.html
"Swans
Against Slander"? Or Delusions of Grandeur? Outlandish
Falsehoods of “Truth Journalist” Ramola D/Dharmaraj
http://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2023/07/swans-against-slander-or-delusions-of.html
Refuting More False Accusations Against Barbara Hartwell by Ramola D: “Slander”, “False”, “Defamatory”, “Misrepresentative”
https://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2023/06/refuting-more-false-accusations-against.html
Ramola D Launches Public Complaint Against Barbara Hartwell: “Defaming Posts” & “Slander”
https://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2023/06/ramola-d-launches-public-complaint.html
PREPOSTEROUS,
SENSATIONALIST BOASTS & BOGUS CLAIMS by Ramola D: "The Story
of the Century", "Whistleblower Retaliation on the World’s
Pre-Eminent Journalist Exposing MK ULTRA, DEW, and Neurotech
Classified Mil/Intel Crimes"
http://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2022/12/preposterous-sensationalist-boasts.html
WARNING: ZERO TOLERANCE FOR GOSSIP & MEDDLING BY BUSYBODIES: Ramola D False Accusations and Defamation Against Barbara Hartwell
http://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2022/07/warning-zero-tolerance-for-gossip.html
