Barbara Hartwell

My photo
Independent Investigator, Intelligence Analyst, Journalist. Former CIA (NOC, Psychological Operations) Black Ops Survivor. Sovereign Child of God. Minister of the Gospel of Jesus Christ (Ordained 1979, D.Div.) Exposing Government Lies, Crimes, Corruption, Conspiracies and Cover-ups.

Thursday, March 30, 2017

Law in the USA: The Scam of the Millennium

See this report, by former FBI Agent and Attorney, recipient of the American Jurisprudence Award, Geral Sosbee, to better understand (than before) how so many millions of our people are illegally murdered and imprisoned by fbi and police.

The fbi (the ‘BURRO’) and its tail, the United States Department of Justice (doj) devise the most horrendous scam that any government ever imposes on its people for purposes of mind programming and control: a legal system that encourages governmental, high and malicious crimes against the people in a manner that offers no recourse. 

In my suit against the burro I showed exactly the law that permits the fbi to engage in atrocities that the courts refuse to hear. See the following sites for proof:

Regarding Immunity :

Even when the fbi et al., execute their crimes maliciously and corruptly {using federal magistrate judges (fmj) and accomplices}, the thugs of government are immune from prosecution: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 8.2.A.1.

Yet the fbi does not actually seriously address such crimes because the fbi has as priority the control of the domestic population through fear and the *specter of selective prosecution. Indeed, the fbi cooperates with organized crime mobsters and drug dealers as long as they cooperate with the fbi.

DOJ comes along for the ride with the burro’s unending crime spree which is unprecedented in human affairs.

So, the biggest scam on the American people today is perpetrated by their government as headed by the burro and doj. One other egregious method of control over the people is to develop a way to redefine the male as a rabid jackal that is ostracized, despised, hounded, abused, threatened, tortured and ultimately imprisoned or murdered. He is in reality not the most dangerous animal on the block, but to the government he represents a kind of universal scapegoat that shows just how mean the fbi can be. The dishonest scheme (or fbi scam) puts all men at risk and is ironically referred to by the fbi as a crimes involving “Scams & Public Safety”:

I ask rhetorically, where is the registry for assassins of the fbi and their operatives who commit torture, forced suicide, false imprisonment and murder! 

No such public listing allowed that compares to the one shown above. 

Indeed the fbi seeks to create criminals for public show in order to further program the populace to fear the omnipresent fbi/cia/police. Where no crimes exist against a political Target, the fbi and the police manufacture offenses by use of real scams, stings and fraudulent ‘set ups’ which the media ‘eats up’ and the ignorant public relishes.

Victims of a psychopathic society created by the fbi have no recourse, especially as the public is programmed to kill the jackal. See the following report and the “dilemma” link therein:

By instilling fear in the people and by allowing organized crime to flourish the fbi becomes a dominant global MAFIA in its own right:

See my sworn affidavits 2007 and 2014 for a few crimes by the fbi that I witnessed as a victim.

See my reports at and particularly my paper that shows another scam on the people by the burro and its tail, doj:

Suits Against Government Officials Regarding the SCOTUS, one must understand that the highest court in the land must support the assassins of fbi/cia because the object of the government is always first and foremost to expand its agenda of world inhumane domination at any cost. 

So, today you and I are simply tools for that expansion. The smaller courts are equally corrupt beyond repair; see the next link and study the available data on secret and murderous FISA courts whose so-called judges authorize torture and mass murder.

See also my WRIT where I had no possibility of gaining a simple injunction to stop the fbi’s crimes against me which are ongoing for 30 years. The US Attorney is always complicit in fbi crimes; see the spurious argument of Sara Robinson who frustrates my efforts in her arguments here:

and here:

In the fbi’s efforts to silence and discredit me, see how their operatives try to further frighten the public: Fbi's United States Attorney & operative "paint me doubtful" admit to 1) guilty knowledge of fbi crimes) 2) spending millions to harass me 3) promoting fear by invoking the specter of mass murderer and terrorist. Note that the fbi has driven to psychoses other victims of their COINTEL program.

Thank you and may Providence provide aid, comfort, and blessings to all who are abused, tortured, and murdered by the fbi/cia/police/prosecutors/judges of the USA everywhere.


Barbara Hartwell Percival 

Legal Defense & Research Trust

PO Box 22

Rhinebeck, NY 12572

Barbara Hartwell Vs. CIA

Saturday, March 25, 2017

Former FBI Agent Geral Sosbee For the Defense: The Offenses of Howard & Maureen Nemaizer

Former FBI Agent Geral Sosbee is my best friend, and has been for the past 17 years. He is also a professional colleague, with whom I have been working to expose government corruption, including the political persecution for which we have been targeted, each of us separately (and later as colleagues and defenders of one another against our many mutual enemies, government agents/officials and their stooges, minions, quislings).

Geral and I, as government whistleblowers, have both been driven to bankruptcy/financial destitution, which resulted in both our cases, at one point, in homelessness.

The assaults against us (including directed energy weaponry, chemical/biological/viral weapons, and arranged 'accidents') have resulted in severe chronic illnesses/disabilities.

We have been targeted for massive defamation campaigns, including character assassination, libel, slander, promotion of false information; as well as misrepresentation and exploitation of our names by unscrupulous opportunists who tried to latch on to us in attempts to gain public attention for themselves, at our expense.

Geral Sosbee has always defended me against my enemies, not just as a loyal friend (the most loyal I have ever known), but based on his knowledge and personal/professional experience, based on facts, evidence, reason, logic and principle.

Geral defends me because he knows me, because we share the same dedication to defending Liberty and the God-given unalienable rights of the Individual, against all enemies who would attempt to violate those rights.

Here is Geral's letter in my defense, against two of those enemies, Howard and Maureen Nemaizer, who have done tremendous damage to my good name, among many other offenses.

The Nemaizers have continued to defame Barbara Hartwell, as well as dragging in the names of my family in their public libelous falsehoods, even harassing them.

I respect the privacy and personal boundaries of everyone in my family, just as I do for anyone else, as a matter of principle.

For the record, the fact is, no one in my family is involved in any aspect of my professional work, nor in what I publish on this website.

Nor was any member of my family involved in the events of 2013, when I was driven to homelessness by the government's campaign against me.

Howard and Maureen Nemiaizer are malicious liars and morally bankrupt aggressors, who continue to engage in diabolical calumny against Barbara Hartwell.

Anyone who promotes them, supports them or employs them will be held accountable in any and all cases in which further damages are done to me or members of my family.

In 2013, after losing my home in Maine, I was stranded for 29 miserable days (November 22-December 21) in a horrible environment, the filthy, cold, dark basement of the Nemaizer residence, permeated by toxic mold, which caused illness for me, and for my beloved cat, Kyra, who later died of respiratory illness.

Howard Nemaizer lied to me, made many false promises, and misrepresentations, which resulted in losses and damages, from which I can never recover.

Maureen Nemaizer issued a directive that I, a disabled senior citizen, utterly destitute and under persecution, with an elderly cat to care for, must be thrown into the street on December 21, 2013, in the knowledge that we had nowhere to go.

By the grace of God, I survived the ordeal, but just barely. To this day, I have not recovered from the damages and losses, many of which were caused by the dishonest, callous and negligent actions of Howard and Maureen Nemaizer.

See reports on this website, exposing the Nemaizers, for the full story.

Thank you, Geral, from the bottom of my heart. You are my hero, a knight in shining armor.


In 2013 you were facing a personal crisis in your life and you received an offer of sanctuary in the home of a person who knew of your dire circumstances and who offered to help.

As I study the reports that you made and some of the reactions of those who pretended to help you, I am incensed beyond description by the the way you were treated in the temporary residence and thereafter.

Everyone knows that when a person needs help in this life, the first duty of the 'relief provider' is to do no further harm to the victim of painful circumstances, to not put the disadvantaged party (you) in a worse position (physically or emotionally) than the one that necessitated the assistance in the first place. If one seeks truly to help, then no excuse can cover up, nor justify such wicked actions directed against the suffering party.

I understand that you were grossly insulted and mistreated there and that afterwards you were further harassed by those who intentionally seek to hurt you again.

Please understand that from my perspective all that has transpired from the time of your stay in the so-called 'sanctuary' and continuing today reflects great discredit on the individuals who slander and malign you. The more these people obsess with or delight in bringing harm to you, the more evidence we see of their savagery. Such personalities, however, are often not capable of recognizing their own hideous perversions.

Today I saw the trash entered by Howard Nemaizer aka Nema.

I am heartbroken to know that you suffered in that hell hole by those who now reveal their true intentions toward you.

I am also empathetic for the circumstances of your life, especially in their company, because I too have encountered similar (but not so impossible) living conditions as the fbi pushed me into the street to live. 
God Blesses you Barbara and we, all who know you, LOVE YOU.

Thank God you survived the ordeal and that you can relay the sordid, nightmarish scene to me and others. The dirty, insensitive statements by the evildoers could destroy a person of lesser strength.

Sunday, March 5, 2017

In Defense of Milo Yiannopoulos: Free Speech Under Siege

Milo Yiannopoulos, 32 years old, identifies himself as Jewish (on his mother's side), Greek, British, Catholic and gay. He has described himself as a "provocateur", a "troll", and a "conservative". He is a journalist, public speaker and entertainer.

Milo is a very vocal supporter of Donald Trump, and during the presidential campaign, went on a speaking tour of college campuses around the country, which he called "The Dangerous Faggot" tour.

I first read about him a few months before the 2016 election, in a magazine article, and later found his TV and radio interviews on the Internet.

Before I begin my analysis of the events involving Milo Yiannopoulos, and the ensuing firestorm of controversy, a media scandal extraordinaire, I should say a few things up front. 

One: I am not a supporter of Donald Trump. No need to elaborate on that, it is not the issue I am addressing.

Two: The pop culture of the Internet, social media, the aggressive, intrusive free-for-all among the participants, the generally crude, sloppy language, the lack of grace, refinement and discretion, the stupidity of it all, is anathema to me. I don't use Facebook, Twitter, nor do I read the entries. 

(When you hear on mainstream news radio that the President of the United States "tweeted" a policy statement, or that the police department "tweeted" that a perp was arrested, how can it be taken seriously?)

Anyway, crying shame though it is, at least by my standards, I'm aware that this is the venue in which most people (including high-profile public figures) now operate. 

To this day, I have never read any of Milo's Twitter or Facebook comments; I only heard him talk about being banned from Twitter for making some "insulting" comments about an actor named Leslie Jones, whom I had never heard of.

Three: Having watched quite a number of Milo's TV/video interviews, I find him to be a very interesting character.  His crude language, his frequent comments about his sex life, I must say, are not my cup of tea, but this aspect of his personality notwithstanding, I think he is honest about who he is, and sincere about what he believes. 

I also find him to be extremely intelligent, articulate, entertaining, even charming, and I stand in agreement with some (not all) of the views he promotes, especially his criticism of the left-wing agitators for globalism; his concern about immigration (illegal aliens); maintaining secure borders; Islamist jihad and sharia law, a serious threat to all women and homosexuals, everywhere, as well as to anyone who defends unalienable individual rights; and most importantly, the stand he has taken for free speech.

The primary issue is, that whether anyone agrees with Milo, or not, he has the right to express his beliefs, his opinions, his political ideology, in any way he chooses, when he chooses, where he chooses. That is the very essence of free speech.

Anyone who disagrees with him has the same right to air their views, without interference, as long as they are not violating the rights of others. Milo has not violated the rights of others, nor has he attempted to stop them from speaking.

So, what is the problem? 

The problem is, his adversaries on the far left, the "progressives", the "social justice warriors", have decided that they have the "right" to stop him from speaking, simply because they do not like what he has to say. They also think they have the "right" to stop others from hearing what he has to say.

And they are willing to use any means at their disposal, no matter how unlawful, no matter how violent, to stop him. "The ends justify the means", a typical left-wing ideology of control-freak thugs and tyrants.

In Berkeley, California, mobs of marauding leftists destroyed property, broke windows, set fires, engaged in assaults, crimes against persons. Milo Yiannopoulos had to be escorted out by security personnel, wearing body armor.

There is a hard line between words and actions. With the exception of criminal menacing, such as making threats of bodily harm or death, or shouting FIRE! in a crowded theater, words in and of themselves are not a criminal action. 

But the thought police of the left would have you believe just that, and are on a crusade to criminalize any words which do not appear in their politically correct lexicon.

These mobs are not mere "protestors". They are engaging in violent criminal behavior, and they should be dealt with as criminals, prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Yet, according to the news coverage I saw, on several occasions where these savage mobs rioted, the police did nothing.

"Bad" words are to be disallowed. How dare he speak these terrible words! He is hurting our feelings! But violence, assaults, destruction of property, actual crimes against persons? No problem at all, if that's what it takes to silence the "offender".

But of course, it's A-okay for them to label Milo in any way they choose: Nazi! Bigot! Racist! Misogynist!

In fact, though I have never seen any indication from Milo that these are truthful or accurate labels, there are real, bonafide Nazis, bigots, racists and misogynists who hate him with a passion.

Some of these despicable characters have even declared "Holy War" on Milo Yiannopoulos

One Andrew Anglin, a neo Nazi from "The Daily Stormer" had these comments (among others):

"Milo Yiannopoulos, a Jewish homosexual, has a history of engaging in sneaky Jewish tricks."

Here, his bullet points:

"-White countries will be for White people

-Traditional gender roles will be restored

-The Jews are the prime force behind the collapse of Western civilization"

And let's not forget this gem:

"What kind of sick pervert doesn’t love Hitler?"

Oh, by the way, these are the same people ('The Daily Stormer' and 'Stormfront') who have plastered the name of Barbara Hartwell, along with tampered photos of me, wearing a yarmulke, and calling me a "Jew troll" on their websites. They also posted images of green reptilian creatures, naming them "Barbara Hartwell, heinous Jew troll".

All because I denounced them as Jew-haters. Which in this case is a truthful, factual statement, to which they readily admit.  And I am not Jewish, a fact that seems to have somehow escaped their notice.  

And although it seems most of Milo's detractors are rabidly leftist (aside from the Nazis), there are those on the other end of the spectrum who have surfaced to denounce him, including some of his colleagues at Breitbart, where he was a senior editor, a position from which he recently resigned, clearly under pressure.

He also lost his book contract, and was, at the last minute, dis-invited from a speaking engagement at a conservative conference, where Donald Trump made an appearance.

Why all this?  What could Milo Yiannopoulos have done to cause him to become an object of scorn, moral outrage and to be summarily abandoned by his former supporters? Why the lynch mob, all of a sudden?

He spoke some words. He made some statements in interviews. Not even anything new, the interviews were more than a year old and had been online ever since. But someone evidently decided that Milo had to be taken down, as in an orchestrated hit.

And suddenly, now he has been accused of the worst crimes imaginable, including supporting and promoting pedophilia. Some have even accused him of the felony crime itself. With no evidence whatsoever to support these extremely damaging allegations.

I listened to the interviews in question, at least two, one of which was on the Joe Rogan show, and the other on one of the most idiotic programs I have ever seen, called "The Drunken Peasants". (Don't'd have to see these characters in action for yourself...)

The comments made by Milo were mostly of a personal nature, describing his own experiences. He spoke about the Catholic priest, who molested him at age 13. No, he did not use the words "molest" or "rape". He claimed it was consensual, and seemed to be making light of it, joking about it.

Then, there was Milo's description of parties he had attended, where there were "very young boys" having "unprotected sex" with men, and using drugs. In his words, what went on "beggared belief".

At no time did Milo say anything which suggested that he condoned these activities. My impression was that he was disturbed by such appalling behavior on the part of these predators. He said he would decline to name them, though some were well-known public figures.

Some of those making the accusations against Milo said, Well, why did he not report the perpetrators? Why did he not call the police?

It's a fair question, but for those asking it, they would first need to understand the criminally degenerate culture in which these predators operate. They run protection rackets, involving blackmail and extortion. And they don't hesitate to kill people, to silence them, to cover up their crimes. So, dropping a dime on these perps, without first considering the consequences, would do nothing to stop them, but only get the expositor killed. 

I would hope that anyone (including Milo) who becomes a witness to such horrific crimes would do all in their power to raise public awareness as to the reality of their existence. And once aware of the identities of such criminals (some of whom are politicians and celebrities), remove themselves once and for all from their circuits.     

The tragic fact is, children who are victims of sex predators sustain tremendous psychological damage, from which it is unlikely they can ever completely recover. In some cases, they become promiscuous and fall prey to Stockholm syndrome, identifying with their abusers, and/or blaming themselves for crimes which they were helpless to stop.

Some will deal with the trauma by trying to minimize the harm done to them, or even making light of it, which it seems that perhaps may be the case with Milo. But that is not for me to say. I don't know him and I would not presume to make such a definitive judgment.

In Milo's press conference, in which he announced his resignation from Breitbart, he explained that he himself had been a child victim of sex predators. He apologized for anything he had said which would be interpreted to mean that he is an enabler or an apologist for child abuse. He made it very clear about his stand against such crimes.

I, for one, believe him. More importantly, Milo himself has not committed any crimes. He is not a pedophile, not an abuser, not a criminal.

That he would be considered such a threat to the powers-that-be, that violent mobs would attack him at his speaking engagements, that he would be blacklisted, that he would lose his job, his book contract, so much of what he has worked for --ask yourself: WHY? 

Because he speaks freely, honestly and bluntly about what he believes. Because he offers others the opportunity to break through the indoctrination which has a stranglehold on their minds and hearts.  

The primary issue is free speech, an inextricable component of Liberty. Anyone who tries to silence Milo does a disservice to all of us, no matter what we may believe, or how we may choose to express our views.

For this reason, I stand up in defense of Milo Yiannopoulos.

Barbara Hartwell Percival
March 5, 2017


Legal Defense & Research Trust
PO Box 22
Rhinebeck, NY 12572   

Barbara Hartwell Vs. CIA