Barbara Hartwell

My photo
Independent Investigator, Intelligence Analyst, Journalist. Former CIA (NOC, Psychological Operations) Black Ops Survivor. Sovereign Child of God. Minister of the Gospel of Jesus Christ (Ordained 1979, D.Div.) Exposing Government Lies, Crimes, Corruption, Conspiracies and Cover-ups.

Friday, August 13, 2021












He who attempts to act and do things for others or for the world without deepening his own self-understanding, freedom, integrity and capacity to love, will not have anything to give others. He will communicate to them nothing but the contagion of his own obsessions, his aggressiveness, his ego-centered ambitions, his delusions about ends and means, his doctrinaire prejudices and ideas.

Thomas Merton

And withal they learn to be idle, wandering about from house to house; and not only idle, but tattlers also and busybodies, speaking things which they ought not.

1 Timothy 5:13

But let none of you suffer as a murderer, or as a thief, or as an evildoer, or as a busybody in other men's matters.

1 Peter 4:15

It is an honour for a man to cease from strife: but every fool will be meddling.

Proverbs 20:3

Thou shalt not go up and down as a talebearer among thy people: neither shalt thou stand against the blood of thy neighbour: I am the LORD.

Leviticus 19:16

Among the range of issues covered in my reports there is one in particular which stands out, and which, from my observations and experience, both personal and professional, has always generated the most controversy: The importance of respecting the privacy and personal boundaries of others.

Defining one's personal boundaries is the sovereign right of each Individual, not to be usurped by the government, nor by one's family, friends, associates, colleagues, or by total strangers.

Without establishing and defending personal boundaries, the Individual is left open and vulnerable to invasion, intrusion, and ultimately, attack, by the aggression of those whose purpose, make no mistake, is to manipulate, to exert influence, to gain control. That is called tyranny, whether it be the petty tyranny of the busybody, or the monstrous tyranny of the despot.

Without privacy and personal boundaries, there can be no true Liberty, nor the rigorous execution of other God-given rights. The first right must be the right to be free from any form of aggression. The right to be let alone!

I have found that the controversy always begins when one person draws a line in the sand, and clearly states to another: Don't cross it.

The aggressor then, failing to respect the clearly delineated boundaries of that person, will usually attempt to justify his/her intrusion, with such excuses as, I was only trying to help, or, I only did what I thought best for all concerned.

These intrusions manifest in any number of ways.

Appointing themselves as unwanted intermediaries, as meddlers in the business of others.

Presuming to speak for others, without their knowledge or permission.

Discussing with others that which was told to them in a private conversation, which was meant to be confidential.

Making private issues public, for a personal or political agenda.

Appointing themselves as “peacemakers”, placing themselves in the middle of the disputes of others, or attempting to draw totally disparate individuals who have no connection whatsoever, into an unwanted association. This is meddling, and makes “peace” for no one.

Attempting to negotiate the nonnegotiable, justify the unjustifiable, excuse the inexcusable, for a personal or political agenda.

And the list could go on...and does, in the report given below.

Most important, under universal moral absolutes, it is the defender of privacy, of personal boundaries, who always holds the moral high ground, for a very simple reason: An aggressor of any kind is always a wrongdoer.

Barbara Hartwell

August 13, 2021

DO NOT EVER...A Common Sense Code of Honor

Persons of good moral character, of honor and integrity, did not just "get that way" by accident. No, there are no accidents in God's Universe. The truth is, God gave each and every one of us what I consider the greatest gift imaginable, aside from Life itself: Free Will.

Will you use that Free Will to respect and honor God, and His creation, by making every attempt in your actions, and in your interactions with others, to obey God's Laws and reflect His Glory? Or will you slap God in the face by becoming an aggressor against others, by trampling the God-given, Unalienable Rights and Liberties of the Individual?

Make no mistake: God-given Rights are bestowed upon each INDIVIDUAL and anyone who violates those rights will be held accountable; even if justice is not done in this earthly life, there is no escape from God's Justice.

Don't "believe" in God? That doesn't change the reality of God's existence, as you will certainly learn – one way or another, sooner or later.

Among those who don't acknowledge the existence of the Creator, the One Almighty God, but rather believe that there are many "gods", or even that they are gods unto themselves, are those who will tell you that there is no "evil" and no "good", no right or wrong, but only the "balance" of Light and Darkness (good and evil) in the universe. Some are so arrogant as to claim that they are "walking the line" in some grey area between the Light and Darkness, to preserve this "balance". According to their strong delusion, in their futile attempts to usurp the very power of God, they have appointed themselves as a sort of Cosmic Police Force to maintain "order" in the universe. These are the persons who believe that the "ends justify the means", and whose aggression knows no bounds. Avoid them like the plague.

It is my belief that aggression is the root of all evil. But before going into detail about some of the acts that comprise aggression, it is necessary to define the nature of aggression. Aggression can be understood, first and foremost, as a LACK OF RESPECT for the privacy, personal boundaries and the Inviolability of Personhood.

I do not approach this subject from a "legal" perspective, nor even from a "religious" angle but rather from a general spiritual/moral/ethical perspective. For my purposes here, I will define a "Person" as any individual human being or other sentient creature. And I do believe that yes, God sees "every sparrow that falls". God sees every act of kindness, compassion and mercy, every act of selfless service to others in accordance with God's Laws, and every act of cruelty, aggression and injustice.

But this report is not about sparrows, it is primarily about the way Persons of the human variety treat one another, and about a Code of Honor, which if scrupulously followed, removes aggression from the equation.

Before you can RESPECT the rights, the liberties, the privacy, the personal boundaries of others, of the INDIVIDUAL, that is, you must first fully ACKNOWLEDGE them.

Communists, socialists, leftists – collectivists of any stripe-- by definition cannot respect the personal boundaries of others, simply because they refuse to even acknowledge them. The so-called "common good" is their hue and cry, and in their false belief that the collective trumps the individual, they don't give a damn about trampling individual rights. But in truth there can be no "common good" as long as the rights of even one individual are being violated. This totalitarian ideology, or tyranny, in any form, is rooted in aggression against the rights and liberties, the privacy and personal boundaries of the Individual Person.

Then, there are the garden variety busybodies, whose aggression may be less extreme and more mundane, but it is aggression all the same. Aggression is a slippery slope, and those who set foot on that path will eventually reach the bottom – at least, without a revelation of truth and a conscious effort to remedy their attitudes and actions, before it is too late.

But it doesn't take an ivory-tower philosopher or religious scholar to see the truth. Anyone with the common sense God gave them may know the difference between right and wrong, between good and evil, between respect for an individual's rights and personal boundaries, and the aggression that violates them.

All that being said, here's a Common Sense Code of Honor, very simple and easy to understand. It is not all encompassing, not by a long shot. Mostly, it is just based on MINDING YOUR OWN BUSINESS and leaving others in peace to tend to theirs. Not overstepping your bounds. Not interfering, not meddling, not engaging in acts of aggression, in any form.


Invade the privacy of another Person.

The Right to Privacy is an integral part of Individual Liberty.

DO NOT EVER: Snoop into the private affairs of others. A Person has the right to keep secrets, if he so chooses. He has the right to the quiet enjoyment of his home, his property, his personal/family relationships, without outside interference.

A Person has the right to keep the physical address of his home, his telephone number, his e-mail address PRIVATE, to protect himself from prying eyes, unwanted public scrutiny and threats to his security and safety.

A Person has the right to privacy in his personal papers and effects. This includes his private journals, emails, audiotapes, videotapes, etc. Anyone who steals these private effects, and/or who willfully invades the privacy of another, by publishing such personal materials, is not only a busybody, but a malicious wrongdoer.

DO NOT EVER: Violate the confidence of a Person who has shared ANY sort of private/sensitive information, by divulging those confidences to others. If someone has trusted you with private information about his life, respect that confidence and keep the information to yourself. Do not be a tale-bearer; do not be a gossip. Loose lips sink ships. They also destroy friendships. Do not become a Town Crier for the private business of others. It's not your place, not your story to tell.

DO NOT EVER: Show up unannounced and uninvited at a Person's home. It is the worst sort of intrusion and the ultimate in rudeness. Unless there is a dire emergency which you KNOW to be the case, or unless that Person has expressly stated that you are welcome to "drop in" anytime without prior notice, DO NOT EVER.

DO NOT EVER: Appoint yourself as a "matchmaker" between other Persons. Do not contact one Person and without the prior knowledge and permission of another Person, try to arrange a meeting, broker a deal, offer your assistance, or otherwise meddle in the business of other Persons. DO NOT EVER become an unwanted intermediary in the business of others.

DO NOT EVER: Give unsolicited advice. This applies across the board, whether it is a friend, a family member or especially, a stranger. Do not take it upon yourself to advise others, unless they have specifically asked. If someone wants your advice, they will ask for it. If they don't, it is not your place to foist it upon them.

DO NOT EVER: Interrogate others about their personal habits, their finances, their relationships or other private matters. Above all, do not be a busybody who tells others how to live their lives; what they "should" or "should not" be believing, doing, spending, drinking, smoking, etc.

DO NOT EVER: Think you have the right to "decide" for another Person in situations where that person may have asked for your assistance. If someone asks for your help, first find out HOW they want and need to be helped, before you take any action. Respect the wishes of those you are helping, rather than taking matters into your own hands. If you are unable or unwilling to help them in the specific ways they request, then say so, and leave them free to seek help elsewhere.

DO NOT EVER: Give a Person an animal for a "pet" without first asking their permission. Many animals end up homeless or in shelters because they were "dumped" on an unwitting recipient by a do-gooder busybody who decided that they "needed" this animal for a companion, or that the animal "needed" a good home, when in fact it may not be a good match for either Person, the animal or the human being.

DO NOT EVER: Presume that you know what is "best" for another Person. Only God knows what is best, and only the Person has the right to decide that for himself. Whether he is "right" or "wrong" is not your place to decide.

DO NOT EVER: Buy a subscription to any publication in another Person's name and have it sent to their mailing address/home address, without first asking permission. Especially, if the Person is a Prisoner, you may be compromising that Person's safety by doing so. Prisoners have been punished (including being placed in solitary confinement) for the indiscretions of do-gooder busybodies who have foolishly sent "incendiary" material addressed to them.

DO NOT EVER: Pay unwanted attention to any Person who has made it clear (either directly or by their silence) that they do not want any dealings or communication with you. DO NOT EVER harass another person with unwanted e-mails. letters, telephone calls.

DO NOT EVER engage in any form of stalking. If a Person has rejected your advances (whether of friendship, "romance", professional business or otherwise) leave that Person in peace!

DO NOT EVER: Bear false witness against another Person, for any reason. Period.

DO NOT EVER: Threaten to, or engage in blackmail of another Person, for any reason.

DO NOT EVER: Use any form of coercion or extortion against another Person.

DO NOT EVER: Draw first blood.

DO NOT EVER: Physically assault another person, except in self defense, or in the defense of others.

DO NOT EVER: Invade the private property, or the country of other Persons.

DO NOT EVER: Wage a war of aggression against other Persons.

DO NOT EVER: Attribute all the evils of the world to any particular race or ethnic origin of Persons, any particular religion of Persons, or to the gender of Persons, making them into scapegoats.

DO NOT EVER promote bigotry and hatred. DO NOT EVER attach blame anywhere but with the specific INDIVIDUAL wrongdoers who perpetrated the offenses or crimes, no matter how many, or how few.

Any group that exists is made up of INDIVIDUALS. Each and every Individual is given the same Free Will by Almighty God.

What will you choose to do with yours?


A Nation of Snoops, Snitches & Busybodies: Tyrannical Government & Monstrous Invasions of Privacy


REAL I.D.: The Death Knell of Personal Privacy

Invasions of Privacy & Meddling: Garden Variety Busybodies

Reflections on Truth, Liberty and the Right to Privacy


Also see: THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY section on this website, where numerous violators of privacy are exposed by name.






Monday, August 2, 2021


"Well, I have owned the mk ultra girl photo. You can't research it without being led to my work. I am not stupid. I know how to influence. So they all know. It is a big hush hush, but they all know me. I have forced change much of this media gong show, but few believe or support me."

"By now it is safe to assume that everybody knows that I lay claim to that image. Others come, others go. Nothing has changed from my POV. IMO, I made the correct decisions from day one. I planted a flag and stood my ground. Others come, others go."

-Ellen Atkin, self-appointed “leader” and “social media influencer”, statements from her monstrous publicity campaign to deceive the public via fraud, evidence tampering, and identity theft, making a false claim that she is “MK Ultra Girl” (birth date 9-17-1953) from a photo taken in 1961

I recently posted a report addressing a “Public Legal Notice to Barbara Hartwell” sent by post to me from Ellen Atkin, which I thoroughly refuted with facts, point by point, and closed with yet another CEASE & DESIST demand regarding Atkin's continuing threats and harassment against me.



I had not bothered locating this document online, though I knew it must be posted, but later found this article by Atkin, which includes links to three such “public legal notices”, against Barbara Hartwell and two other individuals, namely Ann McClean and Julie Gold.

Before I begin ripping this latest defamatory screed to shreds, I should point out several salient items:

~That Ellen Atkin has never once included any FACTS, none whatsoever, when spewing her venom. In promoting her false narrative, she limits herself to false accusations and fabrications, accusing her Targets of engaging in a “conspiracy” against her.

~In this case, Atkin has concocted, and is heavily promoting, a totally baseless accusation of collusion among three separate individuals, Barbara Hartwell, Ann McClean and Julie Gold. Each of whom, at different times, and in various articles, has exposed Ellen Atkin as a fraud. I happen to know that there are many others who recognize the same glaringly obvious truth, albeit they may not have publicized their observations. So, according to Ellen Atkin, just because three individuals have separately arrived at the same conclusion, that must mean there is a “conspiracy” against the actual fraud who has been exposed as such? No logic here, no facts, but certainly nothing new from Ellen Atkin.

~That at the time of my first report, exposing Atkin as a fraud, I did not know, and had never heard of either Julie Gold or Ann McClean, and had not read anything published by either one of these persons.

~That I searched for their names only AFTER Ellen Atkin made her ridiculous false claims that Barbara Hartwell was “cyberstalking” her, under the supposed influence of these persons.

~That I subsequently decided to contact Ann McClean and Julie Gold to alert them to the fact that Atkin was making false accusations against them in connection with my name.

~That I spoke to Julie Gold only once, briefly, on the telephone, and have had no further contact with her since that time, in the early spring of 2020. In one of my reports, I included a brief notice which had been posted by Julie Gold, a warning to all and sundry that Ellen Atkin is an “internet fraudster”. A statement with which I wholeheartedly agreed, based solely on my own observations of the published material of Atkin. Yet, according to Ellen Atkin, this must be a “conspiracy” against her.

~As for Ann McClean (aka Ann Diamond) I contacted her as well, with the same alert. I later, by Ann's permission, posted her article (excerpts), titled MKULTRA GIRL: ANATOMY OF A FRAUD.

And that is the full extent of it, as far as any of my public exposure of Ellen Atkin, in connection with these ladies. There was no collusion, no “conspiracy”. And sure as hell, no “cyberstalking”. I have never in my life (privately, nor publicly) “stalked” anyone. Stalking is an act of aggression and against my principles. But then, principles have no place in Ellen Atkin's skewed world.

No, no, no. No stalking, no collusion, no conspiracy. These absolutely false accusations by Ellen Atkin are libelous fabrications, for which she has NO EVIDENCE whatsoever.

And yet, she obsessively continues this sleazy defamation campaign, with no end in sight. And most recently, is threatening “legal action” against Barbara Hartwell.

I won't presume to speak further about Julie Gold or Ann McClean, except to say that from all I have seen, in my opinion, their published statements about Ellen Atkin, as a fraud, are truthful, accurate and factual. And that here, I speak strictly for myself, as always.

Here is the defamatory article by Ellen Atkin. Again, I can easily refute her false statements, with FACTS.

My comments are given after each paragraph.

Undoing the Cult Psi Op at MK Ultra Girl

by Ellen Atkin

"Since Sept. 2020, I have been laying low in order to straighten out the kinks in the go forward mkultra crime cult exposure plan. I was also emotionally devastated coming back from the Walk With Us rally & documentary 3 week cross country trip to fight for the class action and visit my sister and do my own research when my beloved male cat Boomer (a rare lynx point Siamese) was gone. The dreadful circumstances point to my 87 year old Chinese landlady with deteriorating mental health issues as the cause. So, I had to move or else be consumed with the same rage and grief that has haunted me my whole life because of the mkultra programme and what it did to me and my family."

Ellen Atkin's proclamation of her emotional state has nothing whatsoever to do with me, or anything I have ever publicly stated in reports exposing Atkin. It appears she is baiting the hook with a sob story, in the hope of soliciting sympathy from her audience. And it is totally irrelevant as regards her effrontery in exploiting and defaming my name for her own self-serving, unconscionable ends.

"Life is a metaphor. Like inner, like outer. This is also reflected in the crimes that have sprung up against me SINCE the forming of the class action began. I am victim of a slander campaign that has seriously effected my professional and personal life. Some people may wonder how this can go on. Well ask yourself how the planet got in this mess and it is the same answer."

Here, she waxes philosophical, as phony as a 3 dollar bill, as she calls herself a “victim” of a “slander campaign” and claims that “crimes” (of which she has accused Barbara Hartwell) have been committed against her. Now, she sets the stage to let the false accusations fly.

"When I broke programming, which I chart as Jan. 16th 2016, the day I went public with my mkultra girl history, the first mkultra grifter cult pawn, Ann McClean (aka Diamond) set out to contain me. Her campaign against me was taken up by Julie Tanny Gold, who seeks to represent all the members of the class but has not yet attained official, lead plaintiff status after 3.5 years (wonder why?). Then another internet crank named Barbara Hartwell took it up. This trio can be blamed for the demise of justice for our case."

Here, I must make it clear that I have no reason to believe a word of anything Ellen Atkin says, about “programming", or anything else. Since she has proven to me that she is an abject fraud, and has told so many lies, I can only cite the legal maxim, “falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus”. But now, she drags in the name of Barbara Hartwell, a person she does not know, with whom she has no commonalities in any way, shape or form, to call me an “internet crank” and pin the blame on me for her own dishonesty and flagrant aggression. How utterly despicable.

"Imagine that, the worst crimes post mkultra programming against me, are perped by the very people taking up the cause. What cause, one must ask? Are these people wounded mind controlled fractured multiples operating like puppets to their old mkultra handlers? I say yes. Why would anyone try to kill the goose that laid the golden egg?"

To make it abundantly clear: I share no “cause”, nor ever have done, with Ellen Atkin, contrary to her arrogant and apparently delusional claims. Here, she attempts to lump me in with herself and unnamed others of her ilk, when nothing could be further from the truth. And makes outrageous false accusations of “perps” and “wounded mind controlled fractured multiples operating like puppets to their old mkultra handlers”.

It appears that Atkin is projecting her own twisted psyche upon others, in order to lay the blame on her designated Targets (including Barbara Hartwell) for her own serious psychopathology. Speak for yourself, Atkin. For the record, I have no “handlers”, nor am I anyone's “puppet”.

She then, in her flaming delusional grandiosity, describes herself as “the goose that laid the golden egg”. Can she possibly be serious? Not surprising, as her ego-based boasting and self-glorification is splashed over everything she writes or speaks.

All this, while knowing nothing whatsoever of my professional or personal background. It should be noted that never, once, has Atkin ever been able to produce as much as one actual statement of fact in relation to Barbara Hartwell. Nor has she ever been able to refute even one of my statements. She is in possession of no facts, so she fabricates ludicrous accusations, hoping that if she keeps repeating them, they will stick.

"I have been actively deprogramming for over 5 years, publicly. No mystery there. Thus sprung MK Ultra Girl campaign. A very effective campaign. Effective because I, unlike these other 3, worked around the programme enuf so that I became a professional aerial photographer, self employed, self funded, self motivated. I also spent 2 years as an account executive where I sold millions of dollars of advertising to every facet of professional activity."

Again, Atkin has the effrontery, the hubris, to place me in her own self-designated false category, and dares to make a comparison, where there are NO commonalities, NO similarities whatsoever, past or present, or ever will be, in perpetuity. I couldn't give a tinker's hot damn about her programming or public deprogramming. If she wants to continue to expose herself as a parading fool, with her boasting and posturing, and make a public display of her psychopathology, that is her problem. But none of this idiocy has anything whatsoever to do with me. Leave my name OUT of your paranoid fantasies, you one-woman freak show!

"I spent years building an internet business studying internet marketing. I own good equipment, that I invested in myself and with supporters help. In short, I have proven myself as a consummate professional for over 30 years. Just check out my linked in profile. It is impressive. The puppets, not so much."

Just more of the usual boasting. Who cares? And what does this have to do with the false accusations against Barbara Hartwell, such as calling me a “puppet”? Nothing, as usual.

"However, the despicable malice openly enacted by the puppets is but a mirror of the attitudes my fallen family enact. I have taken up the responsibility for the entire inner and outer families lack of it. For that I have been kid gloved by the system controlling the family, but they would never be so stupid to entrap themselves for all the world to see. No they just hide like parasites behind the money they stole from my mother's inheritance on her side and silence from the other."

What in the bloody hell! Again, Atkin has the gall to drag my name, referring to me as a “puppet” and “parasite” (how dare you, you loathsome creature!) into her own sordid family history, and accuse me of “mirroring” their attitudes. No way in hell, and I have no interest in her family. The only fact I know of, which has been published, is that her sister is a convicted murderer. Atkin is way out of line here. This is absolute calumny, to compare me to such reprobates.

"The class action lawsuit is finished as a tool for justice. It is nothing but a containment field against me, clearly. Me and my sister (disabled since 16 years old when she got 13 shock treatments and her lifelong prescription drug addiction for displaying bipolar tendencies) are the smoking guns to the grandest exposure of the mkultra program in Canada. I can imagine that if Justin Trudeau began deprogramming publicly would there be such a powerful comparison to my story."

Naturally, as always, Ellen Atkin places herself at the center of the action, claiming there is a “containment field” around her. If there's not, maybe there should be; it might serve as a form of damage control, to stop her from running amok, bulldozing her way into the business of total strangers, making outrageous claims and spreading vile falsehoods.

"So, the next step in this freak show is to deliver legal notices to the puppets. The first and second rounds to charging the puppets are underway. It will mean the dissolution of the class action, but that has to happen. We are 4 years into the process and it can be summed up as a negative return. We don't have a lawsuit, we have a sullen TBMC slave destroying people's reputations while she sucks the life out of all the time and energy of effective creative forward momentum by a few individuals who are actually doing all the work for the lawsuit. When ever a victory happens it is not from her actions, but she takes credit for it. This can't go on."

Yes indeed, the freak show. Starring the one and only MK Ultra Girl, Ellen Atkin. Who will soon be “charging the puppets”.

"Personally, I am secure but not secure enuf while the shifting sands of time try to bury all truth everywhere. I can finally focus back on my professional life after months of real action I had to undertake to elevate my position. Thank you to my supporters who are the very best people. I am now in a much better position to move forward. I had to secure a very important aspect of my case and I did. I will reveal later as it is very sensitive and will spell the end of the cult against me, if the demons don't destroy me, which they won't. But if they do, you know the truth. Then I guess I will be martyr which will be used against the truth just like all the martyrs the cult has created to control the future.

For now, I can't see that happening. There is only one MK Ultra Girl."

Now, she's in danger of becoming a martyr, as demons try to destroy her? There is a “cult” out to get her?

I think it's a fair guess that Ellen Atkin is seriously, seriously, delusional. But that is not my problem. No quarter asked, none given.


Get the hell off my case, Atkin. NOW. Or take the consequences.

And yes, there is only one “MK Ultra Girl”, as shown in the photo of an 8 year old girl, taken in 1961, whose birthday is September 17, 1953.

And I can guaran-damn-tee, it is NOT Ellen Atkin.

Barbara Hartwell

Target of the One Woman Freak Show, Ellen Atkin

August 2, 2021