PART
ONE: Nemaizer Misrepresents COINTELPRO
Over
a period of many years, I have been asked on numerous occasions, by
friends and colleagues, why it is that I “bother” to expose those
persons who are inconsequential in the larger picture of the events
and issues of greatest concern, those who are mere amateurs,
wannabes, and in some cases, stooges or minions of corrupt government
operatives. Why not just ignore them?
My
answer is consistently as follows: These characters may be “nobodies”
and seemingly not worth the time or effort it takes to address their
offenses. However, their aggression and burning ambition to “be
somebody”, to seek public attention and approval, does create
serious problems for their Targets, those of us who are already
overburdened with the necessity of standing against political
persecution, including libel/slander campaigns orchestrated by the
government. These aggressors may be idiots, but by their unscrupulous
worldly ambition, they pour fuel on an already raging fire.
Furthermore,
it is a matter of principle. I won't stand by and allow false
information to be promoted in connection with my name, or have my
honor and integrity insulted, along with everything I stand for, when
I can easily refute the lies with the truth and the facts.
The
truth for the record, that is what matters to me. I don't care if
they are world class evildoers or just garden variety busybodies. If
they are crossing my line, invading my privacy, meddling in my
business, promoting outrageous lies in connection with my name, I
will not remain silent in the face of their wrongdoing, but, come
hell or high water, will set the record straight.
Howard
Nemaizer (using the pseudonym Nema) is a rank amateur, an extremely
aggressive busybody, a name-dropper and gate-crasher who is
attempting to make a name for himself by exploiting the names of
well-known, legitimate journalists and whistleblowers. He apparently
mistakenly believes that by riding the coattails of others, he can
appropriate our many years of professional experience, hard work and
hard-won expertise, and make himself seem "important" by
association. And he has stirred up a world of trouble by his
unconscionable exploitation and misrepresentation of the name and
website of Barbara Hartwell, followed by his unjust and defamatory
assaults on my character and good name.
Unfortunately,
there are thousands upon thousands of Nemaizer's ilk engaged in the
same type of endeavors, polluting the Internet with false
information. These aggressive and ambitious amateurs scavenge
information from sources (both legitimate and not) and post their
shoddy "research" all over countless sites of social media,
the 'comments' sections of websites, discussion groups, and in some
cases, such as Howard Nemaizer ("Truth Talk News"), set up
their own websites, which purport to be promoting "truth",
when in fact their agenda is self-promotion and self-aggrandizement,
usually at the expense of those whose names and work they are
exploiting for their own unprincipled ends.
Aside
from creating a nightmare for those legitimate persons whose work is
being exploited and misrepresented, the result of this onslaught by
aggressive and ambitious amateurs is that any person seeking truthful
information on any number of subjects relating to unlawful and
morally reprehensible government operations is faced with so much
muddled information that sorting through it for any grain of "truth"
becomes a daunting task.
And
that's just the way the government likes it – in fact, they have
orchestrated the control of the flow of information, along with
carefully crafted propaganda, in such a way that even many of those
who sincerely seek the truth won't be able to see the forest for the
trees.
One
area where Nemaizer has tried to latch on to the work of others
concerns COINTELPRO, a program initiated by FBI director J. Edgar
Hoover in 1956. The fact of the matter is that Howard Nemaizer does
not know what he is talking about, as regards COINTELPRO, or any
other government operations. He merely parrots the words of others,
those who DO know whereof they speak. But it's more complicated than
that, because he also parrots the words of others who do NOT know
whereof they speak, and/or, he parrots the words of charlatans and
shills who have the purposeful agenda of spreading false information.
But any way you look at it, Nemaizer is nothing but an aggressive
little parrot, entirely lacking in credibility.
As
if this were not bad enough, Nemaizer mixes it all up until there is
only a mish-mash of inaccurate information, some of which constitutes
outright idiocy. But worst of all, as far as I am concerned, this
aggressive fool has been exploiting MY NAME in connection with all of
his misinformed opinions and promotions.
When,
outraged by his wrongful actions, I protested his fraudulent public
promotions in connection with my name. But rather than acknowledge
his wrongdoing, rather than removing the fraudulent promotions,
rather than issuing a public apology and retraction, he chose to
launch defamatory assaults on my personal and professional
reputation, and to engage in monstrous invasions of my privacy, even
going so far as to drag my family into issues which are completely
unrelated. Not only that, but he has fabricated outrageous lies in
connection with all this, in attempts to justify the unjustifiable,
to defend the indefensible.
In
this series of reports, I will address the various issues on which
Howard Nemaizer has made public comments, including most specifically
in connection with my name. I will make the truth available for
anyone who seeks it, and as always the readers may make of it what
they will. I have used excerpts from previous reports as well as
adding additional clarification where necessary.
My
policy is to expose wrongdoers by very specifically citing their own
words.
Howard
Nemaizer:
"Many
truth tellers have been targeted by COINTELPRO slander and sabotage
such as myself, Truth Broadcast Network owner Harry Link and other
patriots like Dr. Leonard Horowitz, author of EMERGING VIRUSES: AIDS
AND EBOLA: NATURE, ACCIDENT OR INTENTIONAL, investigative journalists
Sherri Kane, Janet Phelan, former CIA whistleblower Barbara Hartwell
and many others."
Note
that Nemaizer places himself into a list of names and identifies
himself as a “truth teller” and a “patriot”. He tries to make
it appear that all the individuals listed are somehow connected (as
he did in his fraudulent notice, “TRUSTED PARTNERS IN TRUTH”),
when nothing could be further from the truth.
And
this statement by Nemaizer was made in full knowledge of my very
public and clearly stated position AGAINST two of the persons named
here, Harry Link and Janet Phelan, for cause.
Nemaizer
KNEW, at the time he made this statement, that 1) I do not consider
either of these individuals to be “truth tellers”, 2) that both
Harry Link and Janet Phelan are heavy promoters and associates of
liars, charlatans and disinformation specialists, 3) that I consider
Janet Phelan a left-wing agitator for global government, and that she
is a known advocate/supporter of the U.N. I broke off my association
with her (2012) when I recognized the full extent of her leftist
politics; when I finally realized that she was a collectivist who
refused to respect the privacy and personal boundaries of
individuals, including mine; and lastly, that she was trafficking
with my enemies, going so far as to discuss me with them. And I do
not even know Harry Link.
WHY
would Nemaizer place MY name in a promotion with these individuals,
who represent so much of which I vehemently oppose? If he cared in
the slightest about “truth”, he would never do such a thing. And
if he respected the personal boundaries and the clearly stated wishes
of others (in this case, Barbara Hartwell) he would have left my name
OUT, even assuming he wanted to promote these others.
Instead
he tries to make it seem AS IF I am in some way connected to these
individuals, when in fact I am not.
And
there are many more such statements, made by Howard Nemaizer, which
he has published in articles on his websites and in his videos, all
exploiting the name of Barbara Hartwell. Contrary to his recent claim
that ALL statements using the name of Barbara Hartwell have been
removed from his websites, they most certainly have not.
It
became clear to me that Howard Nemaizer was trying to create the
impression that there is some sort of “group endeavor” among
various individuals. But this has absolutely nothing to do with me. I
am strictly independent, always have been; I am not a team player.
He
throws my name in because he thinks promoting a former CIA agent in
connection with his name will give credibility to anything he does,
when in fact his whole agenda is based on falsehoods.
Now,
regarding COINTELPRO: Howard Nemaizer has never been a target of any
counterintelligence operation, which, as a counterintelligence
expert, and a veteran of counterintelligence wars for decades, I can
guarantee. He's a rank amateur, nothing more. Same goes for Harry
Link. In fact, these two loud-mouthed grandstanders are actually
serving the agenda of COINTELPRO by spreading false information and
indiscriminately buying into all sorts of hoaxes, scams and
carefully-crafted disinformation, which emanates from the very
government-sponsored liars they claim to be “exposing”.
The
one and only reason for “targeting” Howard Nemaizer would be if
he had REAL GOVERNMENT TARGETS on his program. Legitimate persons
are targeted wherever they go. They will be sabotaged and slandered
as a matter of course. People like Nemaizer just get caught in the
crossfire, hit with bullets that are not aimed at them, and then
their egos get puffed up, when in fact the government considers them
nothing more than collateral damage.
Here's
another silly boast from Howard Nemaizer:
"Independent
journalists and activists like myself are more often than not
targeted by COINTELPRO in an attempt to quell truthful information
the secret government wishes to suppress."
Well,
first of all, Howard Nemaizer is not a journalist, nor is there
anything “independent” about his activities. He is in fact a used
car salesman (and it shows). He has no professional training or
background in any field or discipline which would qualify him as an
expositor of “truthful information”, except that which he
scavenges from others. Even that is meaningless, because he corrupts
the information with his own subjective and uninformed opinions and
unwarranted assumptions.
So,
why would the “secret government” be worried about “quelling”
information from the likes of Howard Nemaizer? They wouldn't. The
thought is laughable. He is not the source of anything that could
possibly concern them. It amazes me how these amateur wannabes always
try to make themselves appear to be a part of some cloak-and-dagger
world they know nothing about.
Howard
Nemaizer also makes accusations against various persons, calling them
“COINTELPRO agent” or “COINTELPRO operative”, when in fact,
though these individuals may be criminals or bad guys, they are not
agents or operatives of COINTELPRO.
Like
many rank amateurs, who do not know whereof they speak, Nemaizer
seems to believe that he can slap this label on anyone he dislikes,
or about whom he has heard nasty rumors. For example, he states that
Michelle Wolven is a “COINTELPRO agent”. No, Michelle Wolven is
an extremely aggressive busybody and stalker. She is a liar who makes
false police reports against people, dragging them into court on her
perjured testimony. She was running a massive libel/slander campaign
against Dr. Antonella Carpenter, and targeted Barbara Hartwell for
the same because I am a supporter of Dr. Carpenter . But Michelle
Wolven is not a COINTELPRO agent, that I can guarantee.
Nemaizer
has publicly stated (as if it were a fact) that John DeCamp is a
“COINTELPRO operative”. No, John DeCamp is certainly a criminal
and extremely corrupt, but he does not function as a COINTELPRO
operative.
Then,
there is the notorious career criminal, psycho-stalker Tim White.
Nemaizer
writes:
"White
and other COINTELPRO bad guy operatives began a relentless attack
campaign against me for my association with Len and Sherri and other
reputable people in the truth community such as former CIA
whistleblower Barbara Hartwell. Take a moment to read what Barbara
has put up with for many years from whacko nut job, Tim White on her
blog."
First of all, Tim White is not, and has never been, any kind of "operative". He is merely a career criminal, a government stooge, exploited by actual COINTELPRO operatives. Howard Nemaizer clearly does not know the difference between an operative and a stooge. His ignorance of COINTELPRO is exposed, as he tries to present himself as some sort of authority on the subject. What's more he talks about “the truth community”. I am not a member of any such “community”; in fact I don't believe any such thing exists.
There
was no “relentless attack campaign” against Howard Nemaizer by
Tim White, only a few harassing e-mails and phone calls, just the
usual directed against anyone who had Barbara Hartwell as a guest on
a radio/TV show.
Then he makes another outrageously false statement:
"...what Barbara has put up with for many years from whacko nut job, Tim White..."
No, I have never at any time "put up" with anything from Tim White. How idiotic! I have, on the contrary, always done just the opposite: I have exposed the outrageous lies of Tim White. I have reported the criminal offenses of Tim White to the appropriate authorities.
Nemaizer is way out of line here. He can't seem to mind his own business, but tries to insert himself into an issue that has nothing to do with him. He tries to make it seem as if HE is a "target", when in fact he is not. Tim White harasses anyone who has ever had Barbara Hartwell as a guest on a radio/TV show, or who has used my name in any way other than in a negative context.
Again,
Nemaizer gets caught in the crossfire and jumps at the chance to
present himself as a target.
Here's
another gem from Howard Nemaizer:
"PLEASE
TAKE NOTE: John De Camp is a COINTELPRO operative, who steered
attention away from Satanic Ritual abuse, the White House and the
Bush Crime Family with the help of CIA Director William Colby."
Now, this is a totally absurd statement. Does Howard Nema know John DeCamp? No. Does he know, or has he ever known, anyone who is a reliable source of information about John DeCamp, who would have led him to believe such a thing? Not to my knowledge, but then, I do know that Nema does not have the discretion or discernment required to separate fact from fallacy.
Again, he makes this statement AS IF it is a statement of fact, thus misleading the reader to take it at face value.
In fact, John DeCamp is not a COINTELPRO operative. He has never “steered attention away from Satanic Ritual Abuse, the White House and the Bush Crime Family”. On the contrary, DeCamp FOCUSED attention on these issues, in collusion with the late COINTELPRO Kingpin Ted Gunderson.
Former Senator DeCamp was involved in Operation Phoenix (also connected to CIA MK Ultra), and his “official” position was an “aide” to Bill Colby.
John DeCamp threatened to sue Barbara Hartwell (2005) after I exposed his involvement in child sex trafficking, which he claims to have “exposed” in his book, The Franklin Coverup, which was in actuality a double coverup, a coverup of a coverup.
How would Howard Nema know anything about John DeCamp, Bill Colby, or anyone else he talks about? Answer: He wouldn't, he doesn't. He is merely speculating. And he is arguing from ignorance.
And even if he is scavenging from my published material on John DeCamp, he has made false assumptions and drawn erroneous conclusions from what I have exposed, which was a result of a longterm investigation (since 1997 and ongoing), including testimony of reliable witnesses, documented evidence and admissions of collusion, including from Ted Gunderson himself.
Howard Nema does not know what he is talking about, and considering the fact that he is using MY name on the same page, with his uninformed speculation about CIA, MK Ultra, and other operations of which he knows nothing, he has shown himself to be nothing more than an aggressive busybody, a name dropper and gate-crasher, sticking his nose where it does not belong, and promoting false information which can only muddy the waters, for anyone reading what he promotes.
If he is so hell-bent on making a name for himself, by exploiting the names of legitimate people (like Barbara Hartwell), by misrepresenting them and any information available to him, to suit his own purposes, I can guarantee that his only audience will be some credulous rubes, eager to buy into any conspiracy theories which come down the pike, no matter how dubious the source.
Now, this is a totally absurd statement. Does Howard Nema know John DeCamp? No. Does he know, or has he ever known, anyone who is a reliable source of information about John DeCamp, who would have led him to believe such a thing? Not to my knowledge, but then, I do know that Nema does not have the discretion or discernment required to separate fact from fallacy.
Again, he makes this statement AS IF it is a statement of fact, thus misleading the reader to take it at face value.
In fact, John DeCamp is not a COINTELPRO operative. He has never “steered attention away from Satanic Ritual Abuse, the White House and the Bush Crime Family”. On the contrary, DeCamp FOCUSED attention on these issues, in collusion with the late COINTELPRO Kingpin Ted Gunderson.
Former Senator DeCamp was involved in Operation Phoenix (also connected to CIA MK Ultra), and his “official” position was an “aide” to Bill Colby.
John DeCamp threatened to sue Barbara Hartwell (2005) after I exposed his involvement in child sex trafficking, which he claims to have “exposed” in his book, The Franklin Coverup, which was in actuality a double coverup, a coverup of a coverup.
How would Howard Nema know anything about John DeCamp, Bill Colby, or anyone else he talks about? Answer: He wouldn't, he doesn't. He is merely speculating. And he is arguing from ignorance.
And even if he is scavenging from my published material on John DeCamp, he has made false assumptions and drawn erroneous conclusions from what I have exposed, which was a result of a longterm investigation (since 1997 and ongoing), including testimony of reliable witnesses, documented evidence and admissions of collusion, including from Ted Gunderson himself.
Howard Nema does not know what he is talking about, and considering the fact that he is using MY name on the same page, with his uninformed speculation about CIA, MK Ultra, and other operations of which he knows nothing, he has shown himself to be nothing more than an aggressive busybody, a name dropper and gate-crasher, sticking his nose where it does not belong, and promoting false information which can only muddy the waters, for anyone reading what he promotes.
If he is so hell-bent on making a name for himself, by exploiting the names of legitimate people (like Barbara Hartwell), by misrepresenting them and any information available to him, to suit his own purposes, I can guarantee that his only audience will be some credulous rubes, eager to buy into any conspiracy theories which come down the pike, no matter how dubious the source.
Howard Nemaizer has actually gone so far in his misrepresentations of COINTELPRO as to make a video, titled "UNDERSTANDING COINTELPRO".
In this video, he drops some names (including Barbara Hartwell) and presents himself as an instructor to the audience, when in fact he is only parroting what others have said or written. Nobody watching this video could possibly come away with any real understanding of the subject. For those who do have knowledge or understanding, they would probably fall of their chairs, laughing, before they shut off the video. And remember, MY NAME was exploited here by Howard Nemaizer, in his bumbling attempts at "exposing" a subject about which he knows very little, and certainly is far from understanding.
Now,
moving forward to Howard Nemaizer's more recent comments about
COINTELPRO, from a smear piece he published in efforts to discredit
Barbara Hartwell.
"I
am certain BH will take every word I write and in true COINTELPRO
fashion, twist my words and the truth in an attempt to justify her
lies and con-artist-like deceptions, and try to further discredit me
as she was so skillfully trained to do by the CIA."
Here
are the FACTS: I have never, at any time, spoken, nor written any
“lies” about Howard Nemaizer. I am not a “con artist” nor
ever have been, and I have never, at any time, attempted to promote
any “deceptions” in connection with Howard Nemaizer. HE is the
sole liar and deceiver, which I have documented in great detail,
citing the specific incidents and situations in which Nemaizer's lies
and deceptions caused massive damages and distress to me.
Nor
have I ever “twisted” the words of Howard Nemaizer. No, I have
addressed his words and refuted his false claims, always with
precision, with hard facts and evidence of his wrongdoing.
Howard
Nemaizer, on the other hand, has never once been able to cite any
specific “lies” or “deceptions” on my part. The reason being
simply that there have been none.
As
for “the truth”, anyone with half a brain would be able to see
that Nemaizer's claims of “truth” cannot possibly be taken
seriously, because he lacks facts and evidence. Nemaizer's ideas of
“truth” are his own subjective speculation and his emotional
responses to being exposed for his wrongdoing, which he refuses to
acknowledge. Therefore, like all liars, he projects his own
wrongdoing, his own character flaws, his own evil intent, on me.
But,
for the sake of argument, why would I have any reason to try to
“discredit” Howard Nemaizer? My training has nothing to do with
the issues he raises. He does not know anything about my training,
any more than he knows anything about CIA.
Howard
Nemaizer discredits himself, by his obvious ignorance, his
foolishness and his malicious smears against a person who has never,
at any time, done anything wrongful to him.
From
the same idiotic smear piece, comes this:
"If
you truly are a sovereign child of God, Barbara and not a CIA
disinformation agent, do what Jesus would do. Turn the other cheek as
I am going to do–and get on with your life."
Here
it comes....the same old, same old accusation made by so many others
of Howard Nemaizer's mindset: A “CIA disinformation agent.”
This
libelous falsehood was first widely disseminated by FBI Chief, COINTELPRO
Kingpin Ted Gunderson, then spread by all his minions and stooges,
people like Ken Adachi, Tim White, Brenda Negri, Larry Lawson....and
on and on....
But
here's the real question: WHY would any actual “CIA disinformation
agent” target the likes of this amateur wannabe, this loudmouth
busybody, this name-dropper, gate-crasher and unrepentant liar,
Howard Nemaizer? Who is Nemaizer that anyone would bother to target
HIM for spreading disinformation? Utterly ludicrous, absurd and
preposterous!
As
far as his remark about doing what Jesus would do, he is only
parroting something I said to him when he asked for my advice. He was
planning to do something dishonest, which I told him I wanted no part
of, and in which I took no part. He did it anyway, then apologized to
me after I made it clear that his aggressive attitude towards me
(including pressure tactics and even threats of using me as a
“source' against my clearly stated wishes), would not be tolerated.
This
issue was related to the criminal and charlatan, Fritz Springmeier, and a scheme
by Howard Nemaizer and Harry Link to “set up” Springmeier, a
foolish and dishonest plot which failed in its intent, but only
exposed these two as parading idiots.
I
will go into more detail on this, and other issues, in PART TWO of
this series. I will again refute the lies of Howard Nemaizer, citing
his own words and presenting the facts and the evidence to
substantiate my truthful claims.
Barbara
Hartwell Percival
Stating
the Truth in Good Faith for the Public Record
December
17, 2015
Barbara
Hartwell Percival
Legal Defense & Research Trust
PO Box 22
Rhinebeck, NY 12572
Barbara Hartwell Vs. CIA
http://www.barbarahartwellvscia.com
Legal Defense & Research Trust
PO Box 22
Rhinebeck, NY 12572
Barbara Hartwell Vs. CIA
http://www.barbarahartwellvscia.com