Barbara Hartwell

My photo
Independent Investigator, Intelligence Analyst, Journalist. Former CIA (NOC, Psychological Operations) Black Ops Survivor. Sovereign Child of God. Minister of the Gospel of Jesus Christ (Ordained 1979, D.Div.) Exposing Government Lies, Crimes, Corruption, Conspiracies and Cover-ups.

Saturday, March 6, 2021










I received an e-mail from Ramola with some very bad news: Her You Tube Channel has been terminated.


I can't say I find it shocking, considering the deplorable political climate and what I can only describe as the Communist takeover which has been building for years, with increasing censorship in attempts to silence the voices of journalists, whistleblowers and activists working to defend Liberty and pursue Justice. Not shocking, but still, an outrage, as those of us targeted for such censorship and silencing have suffered serious damages, in some cases irreparable.

I don't know if some (or how many) of the podcasts have been saved elsewhere, aside from what has been posted on You Tube. But I can only imagine what a huge and time-consuming job it would be to find another venue and post them all (hundreds of them).

This action against her is damaging to me as well. For the past 3 years, since Ramola first contacted me with an invitation to be a guest on her program, I have done numerous interviews with her, on a range of subjects. This, after a period of 4 years, when I accepted no invitations for radio/podcast interviews (2014-2018), as I was attempting to recover from the massive damages, and losses of most of my personal property, after I was driven to homelessness by government persecution, in late 2013.

Ramola has since become a dear and trusted friend, as well as a colleague. And her podcasts with me have been of great value to me, as well as to many others, as stated by those in Ramola's audience, as well as by readers of my own site.

I had posted all the interviews with Ramola on my own website, links to the podcasts (all gone now), along with comments by Ramola and by me, describing the subject matter of each podcast.

I will now have to remove the links to podcasts, and add a NOTICE to each report, notifying my readers that they are all defunct, and why. But I will leave the reports as documentation.

The best I can do (for now) is to list some of the podcasts I did with Ramola, and provide the links to reports on this site, along with some of the commentary by Ramola and me, describing the content under discussion. If Ramola is able to post the podcasts elsewhere (assuming they are not lost) then I will go back to my reports and change the links to the new venue.

Readers will note that these podcasts were almost without exception, sabotaged and hacked, as I stated when posting them on my site.

Here is the notice I found when checking the links to podcasts in my own reports:

Video unavailable

This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated.

In Great Disgust and Outrage against the Communist Rat Bastards at You Tube

Barbara Hartwell

Friend, Colleague & Supporter of the Great Journalist & Activist, Ramola D

March 6, 2021

Barbara Hartwell, CIA Whistleblower on United Nations & Communism Vs USA & Sovereignty on Ramola D Reports


This podcast, hosted by my friend, Ramola D, was heavily sabotaged. We first tried to record on Skype, only to find out that the hackers had distorted the video of Ramola, and reversed the image from my website, which she tried to share on the screen.

We tried again the next day, using a different system. Unfortunately, this time the sound was tampered with, so that my voice was distorted, and much too loud, while Ramola's voice was diminished. Ramola had to edit the podcast as best she could, before posting it last night.

However, despite the technical interference, I hope that the the viewers/listeners can overlook the poor quality and focus on the content.

Thank you for your consideration.

Barbara Hartwell
August 1, 2020

Informative conversation with CIA Whistleblower Barbara Hartwell who delineates the globalist and communist aims, agenda and activities of the United Nations, in sharp contrast to the God-Given rights and freedoms protected and guaranteed by the United States Constitution, the persecution of Christianity versus the pursuit of Luciferianism in the UN, and the current ongoing tug-of-war of tyranny in this age of Covid's plandemic spread.


Please support the research and writing of Barbara Hartwell on this and related subjects, please send donations to the address on her website--thank you!

Barbara Hartwell & Geral Sosbee: CIA FBI Cover Stories, Lies, & Provocations (PODCAST 2019)



Ramola D Reports: Mark Trump & Barbara Hartwell, Alerting All to the Techno-Abyss

Ramola D Reports: Mark Trump & Barbara Hartwell, Alerting All to the Techno-Abyss

PODCAST BY RAMOLA D REPORTS: Barbara Hartwell & Matt Szyszkiewic, Equal Justice Tour Call to Indict Hillary Clinton


Candid, inspiring, and empowering conversation on the Memorial Day 2019 Equal Justice Tour event at Chappaqua, New York, home of the Clintons. Matt Szyszkiewic of the Equal Justice Tour and Barbara Hartwell, CIA whistleblower who also attended the Equal Justice Tour event held recently on Memorial Day 2019 at the Chappaqua home of Hillary Clinton in upstate New York describe the event, the Memorial Day parade following, and the intentions and goals behind this determined public rally at her home to demand equal justice for all Americans and indict HRC for her crimes.

The profound message of this tour and the message both Matt and Barbara emphasize is that all Americans need to think hard about the state of injustice in this country today, and start standing up to established “authorities” and public figures who engage in crime by acting on one's moral convictions, taking to the streets to peacefully but publicly protest, speaking out, and asking publicly for equal justice. The future of this country, equal justice for all, and all our civil and human rights and liberties are at stake.

Dangerous to be Right When the Government is Wrong: Barbara Hartwell on Ramola D Reports

CIA Whistleblower Barbara Hartwell shares articles and affidavits she has published from whistleblowers Richard Taus and Mike Ruppert while we both discuss the current situation of COINTELPRO persecution that FBI Whistleblower Geral Sosbee has lately been reporting to us, and include his recent letter to McAllen Texas City Council officials seeking protection from harassment.

We also discuss certain exceptionally detrimental aspects of COINTELPRO persecution which include character assassination, defamation, and slander, a subject of special import to both Barbara Hartwell and Geral Sosbee and indeed of ongoing import to myself as well.

Report # 75: Geral Sosbee, FBI Whistleblower: Endless and Criminal FBI Retaliation

Conversation with Geral Sosbee, FBI Whistleblower on the subject of endless, harassive, criminal retaliation by the FBI which has variously pushed this special agent and Vietnam War veteran, also college professor, judge, and whistleblower with integrity into conditions of extreme poverty, social ostracism, blacklisting, employment sabotage, COINTELPRO persecution, as well as surveillance abuse with EMF/Neurotech weaponry--being reported by thousands in the USA and worldwide--which cause sleep-deprivation, high stress, and health damage.

Barbara Hartwell Interview with Ramola D: Censorship & Counterintelligence Operations

Barbara Hartwell & Geral Sosbee Interviews with Ramola D: FBI & CIA Corruption & Criminality

Report #72: Part 6--Barbara Hartwell, CIA Whistleblower & Ramola D: Corruption, Criminality, & Cover-Ups in FBI, CIA

In this podcast, the technical sabotage continued, this time by having an image flashing across Ramola's screen every few minutes, which can be seen on the video.

It took an entire week of work for her to retrieve and clean up the file and post it. The perpetrators of this ongoing sabotage are making it as difficult and frustrating as they can for us to continue with this series. Ramola is the one whose time and money must be spent in efforts to combat these obstructions, and I thank her for pressing on, regardless of the troubles. 


Barbara Hartwell Interview with Ramola D: Slander, Defamation & Persecution


Sabotage of this podcast was again extreme. We were knocked offline at least 5 times. And again, Ramola had to later splice the segments together, a time-consuming process. In one segment the audio was corrupted by an echo on my end of the line, which in previous podcasts was heard only by me, which was very distracting as I was trying to speak. This time it was heard on the recording, which made it difficult to listen to. But then, that was the whole point.

Informative discussion on patterns of containment and defamation operations run by the CIA and FBI on whistleblowers such as Barbara Hartwell in attempts to devalue their reputations and destroy their credibility as well as directly impact on their lives in deleterious ways.

Barbara Hartwell Interview with Ramola D: Punitive/Political Psychiatry

The government-issue hackers must have enjoyed themselves immensely during the recording of this podcast, in which they engaged in every form of interference their twisted minds could dream up.

The symptoms of “mental illness”, according to these miscreants, include exercising our God-given unalienable rights, as protected under the Constitution, and furnishing testimony and evidence in reporting on massive government corruption and criminality.

Were we “sane”, in keeping with their Neo-Bolshevik manifesto, we would unquestioningly and slavishly embrace the social engineering, the moral relativism, the collectivist group think which subsumes the rights and liberties of the individual; which allows snoops, snitches, micromanaging busybodies and petty tyrants to determine and rule over every aspect of our lives.

Were our sanity intact, we would never stand up in our own defense, or in defense of others, in the face of naked aggression, diabolical calumny, outrageous assaults on our liberty. We would accept the flagrant censorship and accede to the idiotic demands for political correctness which would silence our righteous protests against political persecution.

We would never, at any time, speak the truth or name the names of our assailants, our mortal enemies, those who stalk, harass, defame our good names, who lie, steal and cheat, who threaten and attempt to intimidate us; those devils who, with the flick of a switch, torture us with anti-personnel weaponry, who violently invade our bodies and minds with their hideous electro-magnetic pollution.

Sanity, in the minds of these psychopaths, would require that we roll out the red carpet for evildoers, and turn a blind eye while they destroy our lives, piece by piece, day by day, week by week, year by year, until they have utterly vanquished and enslaved us all.

THAT is true insanity.


Here is PART 3 of a series of discussions with Ramola D, which was recovered by Ramola only after her computer was serviced, following two separate crashes, one during the podcast, and another as she was attempting to retrieve the file from her hard drive.

The entire last part of the interview was lost, however, as a result of the crash, the segment which covered punitive psychiatry as a neutralizaton tactic used on journalists and whistleblowers. So, we will cover more on that in PART 4.

I am thankful to Ramola for her support, especially in covering the issue of the late Ted Gunderson's vast involvement in counterintelligence operations, while serving in the FBI and for more than three decades since he retired.

I am aware that many people who view Ted Gunderson as some kind of patriot hero are displeased (to say the least) at my exposure of him, and continue to parrot his claims that I am a “government spook” or “CIA disinfo agent”. Ramola is now also the recipient of some negative comments directed at her for giving me airtime, considering the fact that my position does not seem to be a popular one among her viewers and readers.

However, my opinions and viewpoints are my own and I speak strictly for myself, based on my personal/professional experience, investigations and direct knowledge.

Fortunately, I have been blessed with a great friend and colleague, former FBI agent/whistleblower Geral Sosbee (who first introduced me to Ramola) who is in complete agreement with me about FBI/CIA counterintelligence operations and the extreme damages done by the criminal cabal out of which Ted Gunderson and his cronies operated for so many years.

In this compelling and focused conversation, Barbara Hartwell, CIA whistleblower, returns to resume the conversation we began in earlier podcasts Parts 1 and 2 on the subjects of COINTELPRO, retaliation against whistleblowers, CIA influence in media, and the peculiar phenomenon of CounterIntelligence aggression as aimed at American whistleblowers, activists, and journalists.

In particular, she tells the story of how a private investigator she hired early on during the period of her own targeting shortly after she left the CIA was himself attacked, both with anti-personnel directed-energy weapons and with paramilitary helicopter and SWAT Team harassment. This form of extreme retaliation against someone who was helping scan her home for audio bugs, etc., was also an aspect of the targeting against her, she explains, since the intention was to isolate her and keep her from being helped or supported or have her life restored to normalcy.

Barbara also speaks at length about Ted Gunderson, former Special Agent In Charge at the FBI, whom she worked closely with once, but who later turned against her and decried her publicly as a CIA spook and disinformation agent. Reading out portions from articles she has written on the basis of her own assessment as an intelligence analyst, and including excerpts from letters from Ted Gunderson and FBI whistleblower Geral Sosbee, Barbara discusses “Superspook” Gun and his close involvement in covert CounterIntel, his rustling up of American media moguls including Hustler editor Larry Flynt in the service of spreading Propaganda & Disinformation, and his own presence in her midst as a high-level CIA Containment Operative.

Exposed ultimately is the seamy world of COINTELPRO as practiced it seems both by the FBI and CIA, where whistleblowers are so extremely retaliated against as to have their entire lives ruined, where programs of public interference are deliberately run in order to defame and smear, and threat, intimidation, and assault with electromagnetic technologies is used to silence and neutralize those with courage to speak out against wrongdoing and corruption.

Addressing also the question of Ted Gunderson's well-known 2011 affidavit attesting to COINTELPRO programs in the modern day inclusive of “gang-stalking” and “organized stalking” as well as child trafficking in the US, Barbara emphasizes she does not in any way question the affidavit, but questions instead the hidden COINTELPRO operations run against her own self and her reputation by Ted Gunderson—whose own reputation is apparently being preserved in immaculate form by a myth-building operation at the FBI.

It is telling that just as Barbara turned to the subject of Punitive and Political Psychiatry—which has recently reared its ugly head in my own vicinity, in Quincy, Massachusetts, via a Quincy Public School official attempting to suppress my voice as a journalist and front-line reporter on the subject of anti-personnel electromagnetic technologies in use inside the USA, on Americans, in a still-developing story being published on my website, The Everyday Concerned Citizen—my laptop abruptly crashed.

Report #64: Barbara Hartwell, CIA Whistleblower Reports COINTELPRO Crimes & Ted Gunderson's Role

NOTE: This interview was sabotaged before we even started and continued through the podcast. First, in trying to call Ramola's regular cell phone, I got a recording stating that “This call cannot be completed as dialed. Please try again.” So I did, at least 3 more times. Her number had always worked before, where I got either a direct answer from Ramola, or voice mail.

So, I e-mailed her to let her know and she called me back immediately.

Then, there was an echo on my end of the line during the entire podcast, which was distracting, to say the least. The 'echo chamber' is a typical tactic used on me for many years, especially on radio broadcasts or calls with certain persons, discussing certain issues.

The podcast was later cut off entirely and Ramola had to set up another time and then had to splice together the pieces.

In this revelatory and thought-provoking conversation, Barbara Hartwell, CIA whistleblower who is attesting to a long-term program of illegitimate and wrongful targeting, surveillance, and abusive energy weapon use by the FBI/CIA on her person, discusses the lengths to which these secretive Intelligence agencies will go in order to “neutralize” anyone they decide to target for whatever reason.

The effects are felt even by those who tangentially enter the target's life, she illustrates, as for instance the FAA official who proffered information on the military fighter jet breaking sound barriers over her New York home when she called in to ask about it, and was almost immediately transferred to California, across the country from New York.

Those who whistleblow or refuse to participate in propaganda creation for the secret agencies often face retaliation and defamation. Describing at length the articles active and archived on her website, Ms. Hartwell notes that she stopped publishing her email address some years ago after receiving inordinate amounts of hate mail, and suffered slanderous takedown attacks online from various quarters, but emphasized she can indeed still be contacted by anyone through her PO box and mailing address.

Offering insights both historic and contemporary into COINTELPRO, the repressive and stealthy Counterintelligence program started by J. Edgar Hoover in 1956, and unleashed on Civil Rights activists like Martin Luther King and others, she discusses especially Ted Gunderson, the high-ranking FBI official who stopped short of becoming Director, and who ran the COINTELPRO program with Hoover and was surely familiar with its nefarious Modus Operandi.

Intent to offer information about Gunderson from her knowledge of him, her initial friendship and working collegiate relationship with him, as well as her later investigative research, she reveals the part played by Gunderson in illegal arms deals, and speaks about his role in covering up for child traffickers and pedophiles such as John de Camp who wrote The Franklin Cover-up, as well as in running “black propaganda” or a campaign of lies on targets, and in himself running the COINTELPRO programs of organized stalking he reveals as criminal in his well-known affidavit of 2011.

In partially revealing truths about COINTELPRO, what Gunderson and others were running, she notes, were containment operations, whereby larger parts of the operation were kept concealed. The odd story of the brief marriage Ted Gunderson had with Diana Rively the ex-wife of Anton LaVey, the founder of the Church of Satan, which both parties spoke to Barbara about, but which Ted denied later as a marriage, is also aired.

In addition, Barbara Hartwell reads out excerpts and statements from Geral Sosbee, ex-FBI, who attests that Ted Gunderson was Inspector at FBI when Mr. Sosbee himself was being forced out of the Bureau for essentially questioning a wrongful arrest; at the time, Gunderson did not do anything about it, nor did he help Geral as the FBI began a 3-decade long persecution of this conscientious whistleblower.

Geral also provides further testimonial to the absolute viciousness of those FBI operatives and minions who blindly follow the pack, going so far as to kill, relating how a young woman tenant of his, Jane Hatley, was killed by toxic gassing, in an untimely assassination surely intended for himself.

Like Barbara, Geral too is a high-profile and highly important whistleblower, who has been coming under focused retaliatory attack taking down his life and career over a long period of years. Especially notable in the accounts of retaliation leveled at both Barbara and Geral is that the persecution has been excessive, with both being driven out of their homes, overtly surveilled and provoked in public, assaulted with directed-energy weapons, and handed death threats, a few of which Barbara shares.

This conversation was attacked both before, and during, and after the recording, with phones being made inoperative at the start and audio tracks being messed with at the end. We were bumped right out of the meeting by the phantom spook who had apparently been a silent eavesdropper throughout, his ire revved at mere mention of the symptoms of Gulf War Syndrome, Fibromyalgia, and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome being identical to the “bio-effects” of targeting with energy weapons. A small part of the video is out of sync with the audio after on-air interference and hacking, but the audio recording throughout has been preserved.


Sunday, February 28, 2021






NOTE: Thanks to Ramola D of Every Day Concerned Citizen for this NOTICE. It has been slightly edited and reformatted for posting here. It may be modified to apply to other States.



ATTN: Owner or Manager

RE: Masks, Distancing, “Vaccine Passports,” Denying Service in this Jurisdiction 




You are under no lawful authority to require your employees or your patrons to wear a mask.


There is no statutory law that requires you, your employees or your patrons to wear a mask.


These are GUIDELINES of the State Dept of Public Health, CONSIDERATIONS of the CDC.


The US FDA recognizes Masks as a “Medical Device” and states they are Voluntary.


NO Public Health body can require nor does require the wearing of masks. “ORDERS” issued by any public figure are being issued in ignorance: Orders to wear masks are unlawful and must be challenged. ALSO: Exemptions to orders or regulations on Masks are protected by Disability Laws.


Vaccines are Medical Interventions which are not and cannot be mandated because of individual health risks. Vaccine Passports therefore will always be unlawful, fraudulent, and invalid.


No business can lawfully demand hazardous medical interventions because of individual health risks.




Preventing entry to your establishment (which is open to the public) and denying service to someone not wearing a mask violates these State and Federal laws on discrimination, free movement of an individual and false imprisonment:


Massachusetts Constitution

US Constitution (1st and 4th Amendments)

Federal Civil Rights Law:

Title 11, Section 2000, 42 U.S.C. §2000a, Civil Rights Act of 1964

Americans with Disabilities Act (Title III)

Massachusetts Civil Rights Public Accommodation Law

General Law - Part IV, Title I, Chapter 272, Section 92A

Demanding 6 feet separation and “only 3 people in the lobby” is also unlawful since it restricts the movement of individuals and may be construed as false imprisonment.


Declaring this as your “store policy” does not absolve you from your violation of the law. NO REGULATIONS are “on the books” that require masks, face shields, 6-feet-distancing, plexiglass dividers, restricting the number of people in the lobby, “vaccine passports” and other protocols.

REGULATIONS are the laws created through an administrative law-making procedure to fulfill and carry out STATUTORY law & are part of Massachusetts Code.

Violating the above-mentioned laws while concealing your identity with a face-covering may elevate the criminal charges against you for denying entry to any person in this jurisdiction.


is prepared by

based on the Notice created by

in association with


Saturday, February 27, 2021

Ramola D Reports: Pamela Popper and Jim Harrison Report on Lawsuits to End All Aspects of the COVID Fraud


NOTE: If you are seeking a plan to TAKE ACTION to defend your rights and liberties, protect your family, and to take a stand against medical tyranny, please watch and share this podcast. There are opportunities to join and work with like-minded people across the US, no matter where you live.


Barbara Hartwell

February 27, 2021




Pamela Popper and Jim Harrison Report on Lawsuits to End All Aspects of the COVID Fraud


Vibrant conversation with Pamela Popper of Make Americans Free Again and Wellness Health Forum and Jim Harrison of Natural Family Foundation and Friends of Liberty United on lawsuits in Ohio and around the country to end the COVID fraud by exposing the fraudulent data on the PCR tests, exaggerated cases and deaths and challenge the mandates on masks and vaccines and thence hold all those who are currently still pushing the fraud and Psy Op, including media and businesses, liable.

Pam Popper also speaks about the many different positive actions in supporting small businesses, starting small groups to meet at home and assemble, claiming one’s freedoms by not wearing a mask that people can do as well as new ventures such as homeschooling people can embark on, as Americans increasingly forge paths back to reclaiming sovereign rights and freedoms.

Jim Harrison informs us all on new legislation in Tennessee to avert mandates on vaccines and masks and encourages people to join the fight for freedom by taking a stand, since much still needs to be done, to push back over-reaching tyranny by petty officials and act to reclaim freedoms.

Thursday, February 25, 2021

ANATOMY OF A CONSPIRACY: A Tactical Analysis & To Correct the Inhumane CJS by Geral Sosbee & Barbara Hartwell










When the government runs out of crimes to charge against the people, the tyrants simply secretly pass a number of civil statutes that carry severe sanctions (against which the accused has virtually no defenses or Constitutional protections), and then process the accused in a largely invisible civil 'justice' system (orchestrated by government thugs and assassins) that is designed to lead to the imprisonment or death of the accused.

-Former FBI Agent, Attorney Geral Sosbee

Here are two related reports which expose the nature of the psychological and counterintelligence operations run against government whistleblowers, journalists and human rights activists.

The first is written by former FBI agent/attorney Geral Sosbee, my best friend and most trusted ally for the past 20 years. He, more than any person I have ever known, understands the reality of being targeted by the government of the country he served with honor, and the thankless task of working to expose and stop the evildoers, to defend Liberty and to see Justice served.

The second report is one I wrote in 2018, which contains references to the case of Geral Sosbee and which further explicates the tactics used to neutralize a Target of these nefarious operations.

I decided to republish these reports as a result of discussions I had with a few Christian friends with whom I am working, and whom I had asked to pray for me, in my distress and heartbreak, caused by being a Target of these operations, and especially because of the lack of understanding and support I receive from some of the people closest to me, who apparently cannot see the truth about what is happening, and why. As typical as this is (as all genuine whistleblowers will know) it doesn't reduce the pain and only exacerbates the situation, which is exactly what the perpetrators intend, for the purpose of isolating the individual and alienating him/her from all sources of support.

I have given up expecting people to understand, it is evidently an exercise in futility. I can only pray God will give them a love of the truth, not only for my sake, but for theirs.

A few last notes: These reports may be of little interest to those who are looking for NEW material, who consider what is covered here as "old news". From my perspective, I don't concern myself with what is "new". I don't run a "news" site. My concern is only with what is TRUE. What is true does not change, nor is determined by what is trendy, sensationalist, or appeals to the current popular culture. It is simply for the public record, and, as always, the readers may make of it what they will.

And for those who may be wondering, Percival is not a pseudonym, but rather my family name, which I sometimes used in older reports, which is why it appears here as Barbara Hartwell Percival.

Lastly, the banners of Geral Sosbee and Barbara Hartwell are courtesy of FBI whistleblower, Bob Levin. 

Barbara Hartwell

February 25, 2021

To Correct the Inhumane CJS

By Geral Sosbee

Here is summary of my insights into the current so-called Criminal Justice System which in effect is a criminal enterprise spearheaded by the supreme thugs in American society, the fbi, and is perpetuated by government institutions and colleges.

On the pervasive thinking inherent in the USA’s criminal Justice System (CJS) and related institutions

I present here a few more observations on my theory regarding the ‘State vs. Individual’ with regard to 1) alleged crimes or offenses by the individual and 2) actual crimes against the individual by the State.

The current CJS wherein the State or federal authority overwhelms the accused is a behemoth of horrors. The mere accusation itself is enclosed in an institutional setting that is grossly prejudiced against the innocent accused, while favoring the accusing authority with procedural mandates from the inception of the charges continuing often for the life of the accused.

In all instances of charging or accusing someone of a crime or an offense, the State benefits by feeding new victims of the CJS into its massive and immoral and largely political regime. See my reports of crimes by U.S. Senator John Cornyn.

Indeed, the rampant crime spree by fbi and police are encouraged by ever expanding and widely accepted sting operations against innocent or confused persons. See my report on sting and entrapment exercises by the State.

The underlying problem with the current, politically motivated, accusatory process is that rumor, innuendo and half- truths (cherry picked) ultimately and wrongly brings disaster to the accused and rewards to the accusers (fbi, police, prosecutors, judges).

So, the thinking itself must be changed in order to not self -perpetuate the very activity that we pretend to abhor. In this regard the government displays a kind of conspiracy against all of society.



Additionally, the current, secret global program of 'State vs. Individuals' clearly exemplifies the crimes by State officials that I describe in many of my papers at


For specific atrocities committed by fbi against me and other political Targets see my paper at on, "What Would You Do, If?".

In regards to charges brought in public and often in secret by the State, the entire structure and underlying objective inherent in the State's power to destroy lives must be overhauled.

Currently, the State uses corrupt authority in the police/Fbi and in the general community to accuse someone publicly or in secret of an offense. The individual cannot generally accuse the State of a crime because accusations are almost always the exclusive domain of the State. This protocol is particularly egregious in State action against political Targets and against others who simply make *intellectual mistakes.

Today, the massive State apparatus

(for bringing charges of offenses against the community) is a monstrosity out of control. The State even expands their power to accuse people by a fbi sponsored "New, Unheralded, Illegal Quasi Criminal Justice System Forged By fbi" (Academia. Edu). This fbi program is an abomination that allows fbi et al. to torture, maim and murder/assassinate our people. See my reports on how the entire federal judiciary is now a party to and principal in the fbi’s unconscionable crime spree which is unprecedented in human affairs:

In another paper at I suggest a way to convert modern, corrupt prosecutorial thinking into an humane and transparently honest method to address errors against the community.


Note the long and painful history of our current structure for processing the accused and see another report here by Randall G. Shelden at:

I maintain that no rewards be offered to anyone for manufacturing a case against any person.

In my experience as a Special Agent with fbi I discovered how fbi agents receive different kinds of benefits (including money) for fabricating a criminal case against an innocent person. See the Rodriguez case:

Finally, any fbi agent who 'blows a whistle' on illegal fbi or police operations is abruptly and irreversibly processed in yet another inhumane system referred to as 'counter intelligence and psychological operations' designed to imprison, force suicide or kill the whistleblower and others. All manner of fbi atrocities are heaped on the Target in these covert maneuvers, including attempted murder and attacks with DEW & ELF weaponry.

The biggest obstacle in the reformation of corrupt government is that prevailing thoughts are not easily modified, especially (in the case of the CJS) where colleges and universities tout their “splendid” academic programs which in effect control the minds of the students and practitioners in that decadent field of study. All such CJS and police training programs should introduce my papers as required reading.

Thank you.

Geral Sosbee, JD













By Barbara Hartwell

"Hell is empty and all the devils are here."

    William Shakespeare, The Tempest

This report addresses phenomena which are, in large measure, considered as “conspiracy theories”, rather than as actual events, involving very real conspiracies.

Conspiracies to perpetrate all manner of evil deeds, each by an organized group of persons, against a designated Target or Targets, individually or collectively.

To be more specific, my focus here is on conspiracies which target individuals, or designated groups of individuals, for the following:

Harassment; persecution; stalking; sex crimes (rape and/or pornography); defamation (libel, slander, false light, injurious exploitation/appropriation of name/images); invasions of privacy; criminal menacing/death threats; physical assault; intentional infliction of emotional distress; blackmail/extortion; attempted murder (either by an acute attack or 'slow kill' incrementally).

In my analysis, I will reference two separate articles which address some of these issues. I should make it clear up front that there is no connection between these websites or authors (not that I have seen), and that I chose each one because the name of Barbara Hartwell was included therein, either by the writer and/or by those commenting on the article. In one article, the name of my friend/professional colleague Geral Sosbee appears as well.

As my regular readers will know, my reports are based on actual events and name the names of real people (individuals or groups). I have been accused, repeatedly and continually of “attacking” the persons whose names have been exposed; of spreading “disinformation”; of being a “character assassin”; of running a “libel site”, etc. etc. And most often, I am called a “CIA disinfo agent”.

From my observations, the accusers fall into one or more of these categories: criminals (especially government agents/officials and their minions), attempting to cover up their crimes against persons; aggressive/ambitious persons who have tried to latch on, or horn in on my professional work, and/or exploit my name for a self-serving agenda; busybodies who lack all respect for privacy, personal boundaries and unalienable rights of the individual (in this case, me.)

One more issue: I do not run an “interactive” website. I do not host a platform, nor provide a venue for airing the opinions of every Tom, Dick and Harry who comes down the pike, or who has an axe to grind. Nor do I participate in the pervasive free-for-all Internet culture of social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) I do not join discussion groups, nor do I respond to the writings/broadcasts of others in a section reserved for “comments”. I do not engage in personal arguments or debates with others, be they my detractors/adversaries, or otherwise. In cases where someone has used my name in their broadcasts and/or articles, my policy is to address the issues in my own reports. Just as I am doing here.

The first article comes from a site called THE PSYCHOLOGY OF CONSPIRACY THEORIES.

This article was authored by one Mike Wood.

The psychology of gang stalking, and the difference between conspiracy theory and delusion

Here, some excerpts copied from the opening paragraphs.

"If you’ve spent enough time on the Internet, or read the New York Times yesterday [link removed] you might have come across the phenomenon of gang stalking – the alleged stalking of particular individuals by organized groups. It might seem like gang stalking is a sort of conspiracy theory, and that we can maybe understand it in the same way that we think about things like the 9/11 Truth Movement and beliefs in UFO coverups. I’m not sure about this. There are some pretty major psychological differences between the two. It’s probably not helpful to conflate run-of-the-mill conspiracy theories, which are not considered to be an indicator of psychopathology, with gang stalking, which is widely considered to be the product of delusional thinking.

In gang stalking [link removed] large gangs of perpetrators will (allegedly) use subtle methods of manipulation and harassment – muttering hurtful phrases or insults while passing their target on the street, repeatedly driving past the target’s house, preventing them from sleeping by making loud noises at odd hours, and so on. Many people who claim to be victims of gang stalking (search YouTube for a reasonably representative sample) allege more exotic stalking methods – in particular, “electronic harassment,” the use of advanced technology to torture, annoy, or even control the mind of the target from afar.

If you think this sounds pretty far-fetched, you’re not wrong. Stalking is real, of course – there’s no denying that. And there are situations where multiple people participate in bullying or even stalking – often close friends or family members. But “gang stalking” – the type that involves muttered insults, dozens of strangers working together, electronic harrassment, secret hand signals – is not really an accepted thing. In fact, suspicions of gang stalking are considered to be markers of delusional disorders like paranoid schizophrenia."

[See link to article for referenced material.]

I will start by stating that my professional background is in counterintelligence and psychological operations, which include a wide range of disciplines.

I am not a “psychologist” (as a term protected under licensing); I am trained in psychoanalysis, in intelligence analysis (both of which include profiling) and as a Christian minister (ordained 1979), specializing in pastoral counseling.

Equally relevant, I have been a designated Target of counterintelligence operations and psy war, especially by CIA and to a lesser extent FBI (as well as other domestic and foreign entities), for more years than I care to remember, but which, unfortunately, I cannot possibly forget.

I have investigated numerous cases of persons who were/are targeted for what is known as a neutralization campaign, over a course of more than three (3) decades. Most of the cases involved former military, law enforcement, and intelligence professionals. But there were also others, including journalists, activists, dissidents and especially, among them all, Christians.

I have written extensively on these topics, my reports published on the Internet since 1995, and my websites online since 2000.

So, when I see an article such as this one, by Mike Wood, which offers a theory, such as, that Targets of persecution (in this case, labeled as “gang stalking”, a common term, but one I do not like, or use), may be “delusional”, that some form of psychopathology (such as schizophrenia) may be responsible for the “beliefs” of the Targets, I will state, for the record, that such a theory is only that, a theory.

A theory with very sinister connotations. Labeling a person who has been targeted for persecution (of any kind) as “delusional” is an attempt to negate, to invalidate, to discredit, and ultimately, to blame the victim. And so it follows, if the victim is responsible for what is visited upon him, then the perpetrators cannot be held accountable. Because, according to the would-be “debunkers” (including, but not limited to the adherents of conventional psychology) no such perpetrators exist. No, it is all in the unbalanced psyche of the Target.

Those of us who have actually studied these phenomena, in real time, in the field, (not at a remove, in some theoretical, academic environment) as well as those who have personally experienced them, will be in no doubt of their horrific reality.

Then, there is the fact that a significant part of the purpose of these harassment campaigns against individuals is to attempt to induce neurosis, even psychosis, through the constant or intermittent stressors and trauma (psychological and/or physical) heaped upon the Target. Aside from all the other damages, they hope to “drive the Target crazy”.

And even if they don't succeed in that objective, they may well have achieved another: That at least some of the people close to the Target, family, friends, associates, colleagues, hearing some of the “implausible”, even bizarre stories related to the Target's experiences, will view that person as “paranoid” or “delusional”. After all, they think, such things could not possibly be happening.

And so, the Target may end up ostracized, even by those from whom he/she believed there should have been a reasonable expectation of concern and support.

As I've stated many times in my reports, the perps of these campaigns aim to drive the Target into a state of affairs in which he suffers isolation, alienation, deprivation. (CIA psy ops protocols.)

He often finds himself alone, poverty-stricken, chronically ill, abandoned and/or betrayed by friends, family and colleagues. He is marginalized, discredited, invalidated.

No delusions, no paranoia, except that falsely attributed to the Target by those perpetrating the crimes, and those who, in their lack of understanding, fail to see the brutal truth.

Now, an item from the “comments” section of the website by one “PFA Beacon”. That seems like a screen name, rather than an actual name, the usual device of anonymous cowards hiding their identities.

PFA Beacon:

"Mike- in the spirit of enlightenment, I would like you to revisit this post, and have a look at some of the glitterati amongst the disinfo crowd in the organized gang stalking community.

Here’s one of the classic “gang stalking” spats that broke out between several former intelligence agents from the FBI and the CIA from around 2007, Barbara Hartwell, James F. Marino, and Geral Sosbee (who sued the FBI at one point for gang stalking)

These agents use the organized stalking discourse to communicate and cross communicate data. Part of disinformation operations is the flip side- to gain information, or to relay information in coded language. Another part is attempts to vindicate themselves after a discrediting narrative has been run about them, and more.

Odd, but true. Have a read, and try no to laugh. But it is a real thing that can and does involve mental illness, but also feigned mental illness, and sometimes, mental illness as a result of contradictory signals, or intelligence quandries, similar to Bateson’s porpoises experiment which created ‘schizophrenic symptoms’ in a double bind simulation."

This character, Mr. Beacon (as I will refer to him) makes one false statement after another, beginning by referring to Barbara Hartwell and Geral Sosbee as

"the glitterati amongst the disinfo crowd in the organized gang stalking community."

Here, he is apparently parroting the party-line widely disseminated, since circa 2000, a plot spawned by the late FBI Chief/COINTELPRO Kingpin Ted Gunderson et al, to label Barbara Hartwell as a “CIA disinfo agent”. And repeated ad infinitum, ad nauseam by the hordes of ignorant, malicious government stooges ever since.

For the record, I am not, nor have ever been, part of any “organized gang stalking community” in any way, shape or form. I don't use the term “gangstalking”, since I find it inaccurate. Nor have I ever participated in, nor been affiliated with any such “community”. I am not a member of any organizations or groups connected to these issues.

Next item:

"...the classic “gang stalking” spats that broke out between several former intelligence agents from the FBI and the CIA from around 2007, Barbara Hartwell, James F. Marino, and Geral Sosbee (who sued the FBI at one point for gang stalking)"

Mr. Beacon now brings in the name of one James F. Marino, and lumps it in with Barbara Hartwell and Geral Sosbee, as if there were any commonalities, which in fact, there are not.

James F. Marino is not a “former intelligence agent”. Marino, in fact, is merely one of a number of government stooges who tried to latch on to Sosbee and Hartwell, to ride our coattails in attempts to gain credibility for his own claims of being a target of a “FBI COINTELPRO sting operation” .

Mr. Marino is a name-dropper and gate-crasher, who was shamelessly exploiting the names of Sosbee and Hartwell, and promoting a plethora of false information in the process. These characters are a dime a dozen, but in Marino's case, he was extremely aggressive and refused to back off when he was told to stop promoting false information, to stop exploiting our names.

He then, predictably, began to libel us on his website, accusing us of all sorts of dastardly deeds, including (you guessed it) of being government disinfo agents.

There were no “spats” involved. Only one aggressor (Marino) engaging in offenses against two legitimate persons (Sosbee and Hartwell) in attempts to discredit us. And his libelous falsehoods against Sosbee and Hartwell remain online to this day.

Mr. Beacon claims that Geral Sosbee “sued the FBI for gangstalking”. Since I have a copy of the WRIT (which is posted on Sosbee's website), I can say that this is an inaccurate statement, but beyond that I won't presume to speak for Geral. Anyone who wants the facts of the case may easily find them on the website, Sosbee v. FBI.

"These agents use the organized stalking discourse to communicate and cross communicate data. Part of disinformation operations is the flip side- to gain information, or to relay information in coded language. Another part is attempts to vindicate themselves after a discrediting narrative has been run about them, and more."

I think that maybe, Mr. Beacon has been reading some grade B spy novels. He does not know whereof he speaks, but continues with the “disinformation” theme, promoting it AS IF this is established fact, and AS IF he is some sort of expert on these operations.

"Odd, but true. Have a read, and try no to laugh. But it is a real thing that can and does involve mental illness, but also feigned mental illness, and sometimes, mental illness as a result of contradictory signals, or intelligence quandries, similar to Bateson’s porpoises experiment which created ‘schizophrenic symptoms’ in a double bind simulation."

Now, he attempts to ridicule us (“try not to laugh”), bringing in the old standby, used to discredit legitimate expositors of counterintelligence operations, “mental illness”.

But who is this character, really? What is the source of his “information”? Why all the technical jargon, with no references, no connection whatsoever to the individuals he is trying to discredit?

What is Mr. Beacon's real name? Whoever he is, he has failed to establish any facts, and presents no evidence for his claims. Case closed.

Now, the author of the article, Mike Wood responds to Mr. Beacon.

Mike Wood:

"I’m not really sure what to make of that post. Marino said something about remote satellite neural monitoring (which anyone who has experience in imaging would tell you is pretty ridiculous, because it’s hard enough to do reasonable brain imaging when you’ve got someone sitting in a damn fMRI machine) but most of it isn’t really gangstalking-related. It seems like a chapter in a weird ongoing internet slapfight that doesn’t make a lot of sense without knowing the people involved."

Well, here we go again...with an accusation of a “weird internet slapfight”.

But before I address Mr. Wood's comments (at least he uses what appears to be his real name) I advise anyone who is interested in reading my report on James F. Marino to view it here:

The link given in the comments is from an old website (2006-2010) where I no longer post, though I have left it online for reference purposes.

I won't bother repeating myself in regard to James F. Marino. Those interested may also find other reports exposing him on this website.

But I do take issue with Mr. Wood's statement about the existence of remote neural monitoring. Marino's claims (most of which in my opinion are not credible) aside, this technology does exist. Look it up (NOT on Marino's site), especially in connection to a lawsuit filed by John St. Clair Akwei re NSA.

And speaking strictly for myself, no, Mr. Wood does not know me, nor anything at all about me. He is free to believe what he will, and promote his theories about delusions, paranoia, schizophrenia, though I can't imagine that anyone who is informed on these issues would buy into his doctrinaire biases.

Next up, another article, this one named as a “book review”, by one Anita Dalton, on a website called Odd Things Considered

Anita Dalton

Book: The Franklin Cover-Up: Child Abuse, Satanism, and Murder in Nebraska

Author: John W. DeCamp

Type of Book: Non-fiction, conspiracy theory, Satanic Panic, politics

Again, you may read the entire article (link above), but my focus is once again on the use of the name Barbara Hartwell, in connection with the principals, Ted Gunderson and John DeCamp, as well as Ms. Dalton's opinions on some of the issues addressed in DeCamp's book, The Franklin Cover-up.

Here, some excerpts from the book review and the comments section, all by Anita Dalton:

[Highlighting is mine, BH.]

"Hoo boy. This is some excellent conspiracy theory, in that it is amazingly insane and involved. On one level, I actually believe about 1/8th of this book. The rest is just so whacked and beyond the realm of reason but with just enough grains of truth here and there that you can’t help but get sucked in.

This book has it all, for the seasoned conspiratologist. It has Satanic Panic, with cabals of Satanists killing children, burning their bodies and grinding up their bones and teeth. It has a ring of pedophiles all the way up to the White House, flying out kids from Nebraska for sexual purposes. It makes reference to militias, Oklahoma City, the Montana Seven, the Monarch Project, Bohemian Grove, the Gosch kidnapping (but no Jeff Gannon, alas – perhaps DeCamp will issue a new edition?)...

But on the most basic level, there is a kernel that can be believed in this book, though like I said, 7/8 of it, if not more, should be dismissed.

Nor was it a surprise to find the unpleasant, sticky presence of Ted Gunderson, former FBI agent, in this book. The man believes in Satanic Panic to this day, but he also believes all kinds of bizarre things, as I will discuss in a moment. He is either a loon or crazy like a fox and either way, he is dangerous. He is also lawsuit happy, suing people whom he thinks slander him, including people who have clear screws loose and should be pitied rather than sued. (Google Ted Gunderson and the name Barbara Hartwell and just marvel at the sadness of it all.) I can say without any hesitation that his investigative presence in the Johnny Gosch kidnapping (and sadly, as most believe, murder) has kept the vulnerable Noreen Gosch in a realm where she will believe anything as long as it means her son is alive. It has made her prey to con men and people who torment her.

I dream of seeing Gunderson in a whacked-theory cage match with someone – I just can’t think of whom I would inflict Ted on. Art Bell has already won an out of court settlement against him for calling him a child molester so it will have to be someone else (and since it was an out of court settlement with a gag order, there are no firm facts and all the information out there comes from sources that I would rather not link to, lest I become overrun with avid true believers from the whole rainbow spectrum of conspiracy, and if you think I’m verbose…).

Gunderson to this day believes the McMartin preschool molestation/Satanic ritual abuse case happened and has been a force behind sending innocent people to prison. He is wicked, nasty and preys on the unstable and it’s not entirely logical for me to say that I automatically believe the opposite of anything he has to say, but that’s actually close to the truth.

Wait. How is L. Ron Hubbard a Satanist? And how come you associate Satanists with power. I don’t know any with power. Anton LaVey had little, Aquino less, and current Satanists all work wage slave jobs. Not to disrespect a way of thinking I find bizarre (as an atheist, Satanism makes less sense to me than Christianity, but never mind), but it seems that Glenn Danzig is the most powerful Satanist around and he denies being a Satanist and has memes made about him taking care of his cats. I just don’t see the menace of Satanists."

I'll start with Ms. Dalton's characterization of Barbara Hartwell:

"people who have clear screws loose and should be pitied rather than sued. (Google Ted Gunderson and the name Barbara Hartwell and just marvel at the sadness of it all.)"

So, Dalton believes Barbara Hartwell has “clear screws loose” and that I should be “pitied”. I wonder, on what does she base this opinion? How does she presume to know anything that would cause her to slur my name in this smug, arrogant and condescending manner?

Well, aside from the fact that she is glaringly ignorant about the issues she addresses, such as child sex-trafficking, satanic ritual abuse, even the practice of satanism itself, it appears she is attempting to discredit the very existence of these things on which she pontificates.

"Gunderson to this day believes the McMartin preschool molestation/Satanic ritual abuse case happened..."

And how, pray tell, would Ms. Dalton know, one way or another, whether or not it “happened”?

Does she know anyone connected to the case? Has she conducted her own investigation of the case? Since she never cites as much as one reference or source to back up her claims, she is merely engaging in speculation.

As it happens, I knew Ted Gunderson very well, and worked with him for three years. I also know Jackie McGauley, the principal whistleblower in the case, a journalist and the mother of one of the children who suffered the satanic ritual abuse by the predators.

I also know, from multiple sources (including McGauley) that Ted Gunderson was not the person who “investigated” the case; he only swooped in to try to take over the case, and then used it on his “resume” for years, for bragging rights.

I have a number of reports on this website which relate to the McMartin case. I don't claim to be an expert on the case, I did not personally investigate it. But I do know credible sources who were involved, and who are armed with the facts.

Same holds true for the so-called “Franklin Cover-up”. It was, in fact, a double coverup, a coverup of a coverup. John DeCamp himself was a pedophile, a fact of which Ted Gunderson was well aware, and who admitted this to me in 1999, when I informed him that I had this information, from multiple trustworthy sources.

When I exposed this information publicly (beginning in 2003), DeCamp was the one who threatened to sue me, mounting a libel campaign extravaganza in electronic media in 2005. He never followed through on the threat.

But according to Ms. Dalton, I should be “pitied rather than sued”.

Dalton states:

"But on the most basic level, there is a kernel that can be believed in this book, though like I said, 7/8 of it, if not more, should be dismissed."

So, she pulls a fraction out of thin air, that “7/8 of it, if not more, should be dismissed.”

Yes, indeed, just one of those whacky conspiracy theories, which “should be” dismissed.

Simply because, without presenting any credible sources, no evidence, operating on a total lack of knowledge, Ms. Dalton says so.

And consider this statement:

"And how come you associate Satanists with power. I don’t know any with power. Anton LaVey had little, Aquino less, and current Satanists all work wage slave jobs. Not to disrespect a way of thinking I find bizarre (as an atheist, Satanism makes less sense to me than Christianity, but never mind), but it seems that Glenn Danzig is the most powerful Satanist around and he denies being a Satanist and has memes made about him taking care of his cats. I just don’t see the menace of Satanists."

Ms. Dalton says she is an atheist. That might explain (though maybe not) why she dismisses the idea that there is any menace from Satanists.

And how would she know how much “power” to attribute to the various satanists she names?

So, she does not believe in God and perhaps as a corollary, she does not believe in Satan.

I can only say that in my opinion Ms. Dalton has been greatly deceived; that she thinks she knows far more than she does; and that what she thinks she knows is based on speculation, erroneous assumptions, and probably on buying into some very well-crafted disinformation, meant to discredit legitimate sources who have exposed the very real horrors of child sex trafficking/pornography; the epidemic of satanism, which has reached unprecedented proportions, worldwide and which is drawing in millions, especially through the heavy metal/devil worship culture.

Satan does not exist? His minions don't really exist and have no power to wreak havoc and destroy the lives of innocent children?

Try telling that to the victims, the countless children abducted every year, to be used as sex slaves, and then merely disposed of. Tell it to those who are kept in cages, who have experienced the worst of the worst soul-shattering evil, from which they can never completely recover, even if they live to tell their stories. Tell it to the parents and the families whose lives have been ruined in the wake of these devastating crimes.

In summary, I ask the readers to please seriously consider the topics covered here; if you are not concerned about them, you should be, even if only for the sake of your children and grandchildren.

Don't allow self-proclaimed 'experts' or pontificating pundits, to determine your beliefs.

Those who would have you believe, Oh that? That's just a whacky conspiracy theory. Pay it no mind.

After all, it is clear that those who talk about such things are delusional, paranoid, mentally ill, they have a few screws loose....

Believe this at your own risk, because mark my words, it will eventually involve you, your family and loved ones, one way or another, whether you think so, or not.

Barbara Hartwell Percival

March 3, 2018