Barbara Hartwell

My photo
Independent Investigator, Intelligence Analyst, Journalist. Former CIA (NOC, Psychological Operations) Black Ops Survivor. Sovereign Child of God. Minister of the Gospel of Jesus Christ (Ordained 1979, D.Div.) Exposing Government Lies, Crimes, Corruption, Conspiracies and Cover-ups.

Monday, September 6, 2021

TYRANNY, TREACHERY, TERRORISM & TRAUMA: THE FORMULA (For the 20th Anniversary of 9/11)













NOTE: This article was written in October, 2001. This is the fifth republication on my website, 2001, 2oo5, 2008, 2017, and 2021, for the twentieth anniversary.

Since the first publication, now 20 years later, I have not changed my opinion, based on my original analysis of the events of 9/11/2001. However, based on subsequent observations, coupled with what has been revealed to me by the Holy Spirit, it is clear that the satanic agenda of the movers and shakers of the New World Order has proceeded apace.

Consider the virulent anti-Christian ideologies and policies promoted and supported by the left-wing agitators, the “progressives” (read Marxists), the Neo Bolsheviks, the United Nations, BLM, Antifa. For all intents and purposes, this country has become a de facto bastion of vile Communism.

Consider also those who claim to “oppose” the demonic left, also promoting their utterly fraudulent “solutions”: just as one example, the cult of QAnon and its numerous loudmouth shills, the mountebanks, the snake oil salesmen, the merchants of false hope. Raking in the cash, with glad-handing pep talks, as they snare the hearts and minds of those who can only be described as dupes, falsely believing they are supporting “truth”, “freedom” and “patriotism”.

Now, as this country has fallen to an unprecedented level of spiritual darkness, anyone with eyes to see, ears to hear, will know that there is ONLY ONE SOLUTION:

Jesus Christ, The Way The Truth and The Life.

Get on the Side of the Angels, while there is yet time.

Barbara Hartwell

September 2021


I wrote this article in October 2001, less than one month after the terrorist attack on the WTC. Something I didn't say in the article: I knew, beyond any doubt, the minute I saw it unfolding on TV, that it was an Inside Job.

Since I do not watch television and have not had any cable hook-up for many years, I had to go to a neighbor's house to watch the news reports, after receiving a phone call from my niece in Colorado.

Call it Spirit-filled intuition (clairvoyance), one of the gifts of the Spirit God has bestowed on me. Call it reason or logic, based on my many years of direct experience working for the criminals in the U.S. Government. Call it anything you like. All I can say is that I immediately knew it to be true: It was an Inside Job.

I have never personally investigated 9-11, at least not the nuts-and-bolts variety of forensic investigation. I did not have that opportunity, lacking the resources and having lost most of my professional contacts in law enforcement and the intelligence community by that time.

In fact, many years ago, I had worked on a somewhat regular basis with various police departments, including NYPD, as an "independent consultant" (though I was often "sent" by CIA); where I worked with detectives in investigations of murder and other criminal cases, missing persons, etc.

Though I was born on Manhattan Island and lived there for many years, on and off, from early childhood until I was in my mid-twenties; attended college and seminary there, I moved from that place for good in 1975 and have only gone back infrequently over the years since then. After 9-11, I have refused to go there at all. Just my choice and for personal reasons.

But since so many people in the general public now (finally!) believe that 9-11 was an Inside Job, as a result of the many reports based on real forensic investigations by professionals since that time, I thought it might be interesting to repost this article.

It was originally published by Conspiracy Planet and subsequently made its way onto many other sites. None of those sites will publish my work anymore, as a result of the libel and disinfo campaigns being waged by my enemies in the U.S. Government and their stooges, toadies and minions.

I should add that this article is an editorial. It is based on my opinions (as a former intelligence agent, a Jungian analyst and Christian minister); considered professional opinions though those may be.

Though there are many facts included, those facts do not in any way substantiate my opinion that 9-11 was an Inside Job. So please, as always, I ask that you read it with an open mind, a compassionate heart, and make of it what you will.

One more thing you need to know: Included in this article is a transcript of the "deathbed confession", a videotape which was later revealed to be a hoax. The hoax was perpetrated by filmmaker, Mike Z.


When I first found out about the hoax, I was furious, to the blood-boiling point. I called Mike Z a "scumbag" in public reports and generally gave him hell. You see, I was the only person (or at least the first) who actually made a written transcript from the video and incorporated it into a widely published article.

But it is important to say that the deathbed confession itself was in no way the pivotal issue in writing the article. I had begun the article before I got the video by e-mail from Mike Z. I included it because it seemed to fit so well into everything I believed (and still do, to this day) about the 9-11 Terrorist Attack. And about the satanists who run the U.S. Government. So please keep this in mind when reading the article.

Lastly, Mike Z apologized to me some time later. Below, find his e-mail to me. I did forgive him, after speaking to him on the phone. He admitted his ploy was wrongful, seemed truly repentant and I accepted his apology, though as I told him, I don't condone what he did.

He is certainly a talented artist, and if he would use his talents to make "protest" films without promoting them as the real deal, he could be doing a great service to the skeptics who do not believe the government is capable of such things as terrorist acts of mass murder, all the while blaming the scapegoat du jour, which in the case of 9-11 happened to be Osama bin Laden (a longtime CIA asset.)

Mike Zieper's Letter to Barbara Hartwell:

Dear Barbara,

I owe you an apology. I used you to expose my tape to the world. And I should have thanked you for your help.

I believe that there are very simple reasons why things are the way they are. I made the DEATHBED CONFESSION tape to communicate some of these ideas.

At the time, I wanted to avoid a flame war so I accepted the criticism and abuse that I received. I understand that I was muddying already murky waters.

But you should know that I read the article you wrote (TYRANNY, TREACHERY, TERRORISM & TRAUMA) and agreed with your analysis of the situation completely.

I can't begin to understand what you have personally been through. I've had my share of weirdness since the FBI took an interest in me.

But, as one person whose email is being read to another, I want to say that you have done great work.

Don't give up the fight,

Mike Z


No doubt about it, there was a formula utilized by the perpetrators of Nine-One-One. No matter whodunit --it was a well and precisely planned operation.

From Webster's Dictionary, a definition of 'formula':

"A set form of words for use in a ceremony or ritual".

The formula can best be described in four simple words:


TYRANNY: Absolute power, especially when exercised unjustly or cruelly.

TREACHERY: Willful betrayal of fidelity, confidence or trust; perfidy.

TERRORISM: The systematic use of terror, violence and intimidation to achieve an end.

TRAUMA: An emotional shock that creates substantial and lasting damage to the psychological development of the individual, generally leading to neurosis.

Which leads us to.....

TOTALITARIANISM: A form of government in which one person or party exercises absolute control over all spheres of human life and opposing parties are not permitted to exist.

Sound familiar? Where have we heard this before? Has our government betrayed us? Are we being ushered into the Fourth Reich? couldn't happen here..... Or could it?


Was the mass murder and mayhem -the operation code named Nine-One-One- a ceremony or ritual?

And if so, what kind of ritual? For what purpose?

Was Nine-One-One simply the most extreme 'international incident' to date in a long-term operation of 'trauma-based programming, a part of the 'ritual abuse' of the American public?

Worse yet, was it a 'Satanic Blood Sacrifice'?

Could these sorts of hideous rituals be part and parcel of the programming of the collective American psyche? If so, to what end?

These are not easy questions to answer, much less furnish proof for. Yet the answers leap out in a plethora of dramatic symbols, for those who have eyes to see -and more importantly- the freedom of mind to perceive.



For centuries, occultists have relied on symbols to harness the power of the human mind for use in rituals.

By far, the greatest creative power resides not in the conscious mind, but in the unconscious, and even more so in the vast reservoir of what Carl Jung termed the Collective Unconscious. The unconscious 'thinks' in symbols (pictures) instead of words. If a picture is worth a thousand words, maybe that's why.

You don't have to believe in Jung's theories to understand the power of symbols. Symbols are all around us; but never more compelling than when they are internalized within the life-force of the mind.

Internalizing a symbol is not hard to do, either by a voluntary act of conscious will, as in prayer or meditation....or by the imposition of someone else's will as in hypnotic suggestion, black magic or mind control.

Once a symbol has been internalized, it takes on a life of its own. And once it digs in and puts down roots, its power over the mind of the host -for good or ill- grows as it is watered and fed by the conscious mind.

The easiest way to 'feed' a symbol is to use repetition.

Flash that symbol over and over in front of the subject's eyes until the point of saturation and it reaches critical mass.

The perpetrators of mind control have developed this sort of 'ritual' not only as a science, but to a near art form. Dominating the energy -individually or collectively- in the psyche of the target is the cornerstone of mind control.


Let's consider the most potent symbol flashed into our consciousness by the perps of Nine-One-One.

The World Trade Center towers.

A raging inferno.

People leaping from the windows.

A larger-than-life spectacle of death and destruction.

Many writers have noted that there was an element of unreality in it all -like something you'd see in a movie.

But it wasn't a theatrical production. It was real.

The immediate reaction of most people witnessing this horror was shock, or intense shock and trauma. How could it be otherwise?

When trauma strikes, the boundaries protecting the psyche come crashing down. The ability to think critically and analytically is suspended. Until the shock wears off -if it ever does- the traumatized mind simply reacts. And it reacts emotionally.

A traumatized mind is vulnerable and therefore far more suggestible. And the suggestions the mind is most willing to accept are those which it believes will ensure its protection and any cost. This the key to "trauma-based programming".

Read it and weep: It works.

Could it be that Operation Nine-One-One was planned for this precise purpose?

Using terrorism to traumatize Americans into a mass panic which the perps knew would lead to their unquestioning and emotionally-based desire for protection and any cost?

Have many traumatized Americans been programmed to give up their freedoms in the false, irrational and emotionally-based belief that they can exchange their freedom for protection and thus ensure their survival?

If so, they've made a deal with the devil --and there will be hell to pay.



It is hard to pinpoint with precision the beginning of institutionalized use of mind control in America , but 1947 was certainly a critical year.

In 1947, the Central Intelligence Agency was created from its precursor, the Office of Strategic Services. The agency was staffed predominantly with Nazi scientists brought to the U.S. under an operation code named Paperclip.

In 1953, the CIA 'officially' began the MK Ultra mind control program, under the direction of Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, incorporating roughly 165 sub-projects.

George Hunter White, colleague of Nazi criminal Sydney Gottlieb, described his involvement in the CIA's infamous MK Ultra project this way:

"I toiled wholeheartedly in the vineyards because it was fun, fun, fun.....Where else could a red-blooded American boy lie, kill, cheat, steal, rape and pillage with the sanction and blessing of the all-highest?"

Indeed, where else? Where else, but in America, the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave. Home of the Criminally Insane Agency.

Does this utterly demented, deranged and demonic mind-set tell you anything about the agency -or the government- that could implement such a project, at the cost of unimaginable human suffering, while the perpetrators are swept merrily along in the sadistic thrill of it all?

Who can tell us about the depth of such suffering?

Maybe we could ask Eric Olsen. CIA "suicided" his father, Frank Olsen in 1953, connected to the MK Ultra operation, then engaged in a massive cover-up. The real story has only just begun to come out, but the lies and betrayal continue apace.

In 1999 The Expert Witness Show, hosted by Mike Levine, ran a series of programs about CIA mind control. I was one of the guests interviewed, as were Eric Olsen and Martin Lee, author of Acid Dreams, a classic book on CIA and MK Ultra.

I was asked to appear on the program as a survivor of MK Ultra. Yet I was given little opportunity to tell my story. Had I been allowed more air-time, perhaps my testimony would have shed some light not only on the mind control abuses of the past, well-documented and eloquently stated by Olsen and Lee, but on the fact that the atrocities of mind control are still going on to this day in our country.

Sydney Gottlieb, the project's founder, was purportedly ordered by DCI to destroy all MK Ultra documents, circa 1976-77. We know that ALL the documents were not destroyed, as evidenced by those which remain. However it is my belief that there are many more documents in existence which have not yet come to light. I believe this because of my own involvement in MK Ultra and other black projects and also because this has been confirmed to me by insider sources.

Furthermore, I know the project was never abandoned, as CIA claims. I know this because I myself was still involved long after the program was purportedly "discontinued".

In fact, MK Ultra is still operating today. The names of its sub-projects may have changed and some of the players have passed away. But the game remains the same. It didn't stop. It just went deeper black, that's all.

And what's worse, the scope of mind control has expanded to include not just a small group of "test subjects" but the attempted brainwashing of the entire population.

Witness: HAARP
Witness: EM Frequency Weapons
Witness: Psychotropic Drugs
Witness: Satellite technologies
Witness: Biochip Implants

And these mind control systems are only the tip of the iceberg...

In the words of the psychopath Jose Delgado: "A psycho-civilized society."



On the evening of October 6, 2001, I began writing this article. On the morning of October 7, I received e-mail from an unknown source. Strangely enough, the content of the message fit right in with what I was writing. It may shed some light into the darkest corners of the human psyche, as reflected by the body politic. And, if true, it is chilling to contemplate.

Subject: conspiracy tape?
Message: have you seen this ?

I had not, so I clicked on the URL to a web page which contained one item: a link to a video. The text on the web page: "This is a tape that was made by my father-in-law's client, who was dying of cancer. He left instructions that he wanted it to be seen."

The scene opened on a man in a hospital bed. A full head of white hair and thick black-framed glasses. Tubes ran from a bedside machine into his right arm.

It was the deathbed confession of a man who claimed to have worked for 27 years for "the group with no name". His identity as well, was undetermined.

The man appeared to be addressing his lawyer, "John" making a confession regarding the nefarious activities he had been involved in. He appeared agitated and had some difficulty speaking, so some of his testimony was unintelligible. I've transcribed it to the the best of my ability here:

"John, this is the last time you'll hear from me. Thanks for your friendship, your loyalty, thanks for your hard work. You've been more than just my lawyer, you've been a good friend.

I'm going to ask for one more favor. Do this thing for me. I'm going to tell you....secrets. These things are true. I want to tell people. I want people to confess.....

About the Wall Street that never was.....all lies.

Something else...I've been working for the group with no name....the way things are done.

I, bookkeeping...keeping track of the money. They don't care about money...listen, I can try to explain...but it's difficult...gonna be hard to explain.

I'm not crazy.....You've heard all those conspiracy stories...Jews, Masons, secret societies....some truth in sounds insane.

But I tell you, I've seen terrible things....listen....

The Mayan culture in South America....Mayans were the first ones... no one discusses these things.

They killed....[unintelligible]

Harrington was always talking....he's gone now....leave his name out of it.

They betrayed us.....our era.

This is the way things are done. You must have wondered yourself... what the hell is going on here? This is the way things are done. Listen to me...try to understand.

The blood sacrifices they did down there...hearts were torn out... thousands of them...their own people. You know why they did it? It's the power...the power created from pain and suffering.

There are those who have ultimate power....who decide how things will go....part of a strategy...part of a plan.

Let me explain....I was programmed in the usual ways... Skull and Bones, the Bohemian Grove....[unintelligible] I could be used....

I don't know all that much....

The reason is the transfer of power...that's why they do what they do....magic...ancient magic....occult practices.

They discovered the transfer of power and energy...know what I'm talking about?

They discovered certain practices. You can't even conceive of. I don't exactly know how it's done. I avoided finding out. I couldn't stomach it.

The reason they create wars, atrocities, murder, assassinations, creates a form of They use that. I don't know how....I know it moves... and it works....I've seen it... horrible things. It's a works.

I wasn't involved in that. It just came into my life...27 goddamn years!

They told me I'd be there to witness the end...I was this close... 27 I won't be there to witness it... to see it coming...and to die now.

You know I never smoked...they do this all the's right to do this to me....

They lied...I kept my end of the bargain...they said there was no problem.

They lied....

Listen... May 17...August 9....November 5...November what happens....then you'll know.

I'm speaking the truth.

There is no way to stop them. Both sides know how it works... terrorists in the third world... doing the things we used to do... They've already started killing off the's in the water... it's in the air...

It's the way things are... I can't put it any clearer than that...God help me...

Get this goddamn thing away from me! Turn it off!" [Waving his arms at the camera.]

End transcript.

Was this tape a hoax? I don't believe so. There were too many realistic elements. The hospital setting. The man's obvious distress and difficulty speaking. To me, it comes off as a real deathbed confession.

Of course, it proves nothing. But how much "proof" do we need?

Haven't we heard and read about all of this many times before? Ad nauseum?

How many witnesses do we need? How many confessions? How much testimony?

How many tortured souls?

How much more bloodshed?

When is enough, enough?



Now I have a few questions for all self-respecting, freedom-loving American citizens:

Are you willing to "negotiate" with the powers-that-be for your freedom?

Do you believe that your freedom, like a license to drive or to practice law, is a privilege issued by the state?

Will you let your freedom -or lack thereof- be determined by the covert agenda of a "group with no name", a cabal of Satanists and Bonesmen perpetrating mind control, fomenting terrorism and engaging in blood sacrifice rituals?

Or is your freedom -- as protected under the U.S. Constitution-- a God-given right?

You decide.

Freedom begins in the mind.

Barbara Hartwell
October, 2001

Friday, August 13, 2021












He who attempts to act and do things for others or for the world without deepening his own self-understanding, freedom, integrity and capacity to love, will not have anything to give others. He will communicate to them nothing but the contagion of his own obsessions, his aggressiveness, his ego-centered ambitions, his delusions about ends and means, his doctrinaire prejudices and ideas.

Thomas Merton

And withal they learn to be idle, wandering about from house to house; and not only idle, but tattlers also and busybodies, speaking things which they ought not.

1 Timothy 5:13

But let none of you suffer as a murderer, or as a thief, or as an evildoer, or as a busybody in other men's matters.

1 Peter 4:15

It is an honour for a man to cease from strife: but every fool will be meddling.

Proverbs 20:3

Thou shalt not go up and down as a talebearer among thy people: neither shalt thou stand against the blood of thy neighbour: I am the LORD.

Leviticus 19:16

Among the range of issues covered in my reports there is one in particular which stands out, and which, from my observations and experience, both personal and professional, has always generated the most controversy: The importance of respecting the privacy and personal boundaries of others.

Defining one's personal boundaries is the sovereign right of each Individual, not to be usurped by the government, nor by one's family, friends, associates, colleagues, or by total strangers.

Without establishing and defending personal boundaries, the Individual is left open and vulnerable to invasion, intrusion, and ultimately, attack, by the aggression of those whose purpose, make no mistake, is to manipulate, to exert influence, to gain control. That is called tyranny, whether it be the petty tyranny of the busybody, or the monstrous tyranny of the despot.

Without privacy and personal boundaries, there can be no true Liberty, nor the rigorous execution of other God-given rights. The first right must be the right to be free from any form of aggression. The right to be let alone!

I have found that the controversy always begins when one person draws a line in the sand, and clearly states to another: Don't cross it.

The aggressor then, failing to respect the clearly delineated boundaries of that person, will usually attempt to justify his/her intrusion, with such excuses as, I was only trying to help, or, I only did what I thought best for all concerned.

These intrusions manifest in any number of ways.

Appointing themselves as unwanted intermediaries, as meddlers in the business of others.

Presuming to speak for others, without their knowledge or permission.

Discussing with others that which was told to them in a private conversation, which was meant to be confidential.

Making private issues public, for a personal or political agenda.

Appointing themselves as “peacemakers”, placing themselves in the middle of the disputes of others, or attempting to draw totally disparate individuals who have no connection whatsoever, into an unwanted association. This is meddling, and makes “peace” for no one.

Attempting to negotiate the nonnegotiable, justify the unjustifiable, excuse the inexcusable, for a personal or political agenda.

And the list could go on...and does, in the report given below.

Most important, under universal moral absolutes, it is the defender of privacy, of personal boundaries, who always holds the moral high ground, for a very simple reason: An aggressor of any kind is always a wrongdoer.

Barbara Hartwell

August 13, 2021

DO NOT EVER...A Common Sense Code of Honor

Persons of good moral character, of honor and integrity, did not just "get that way" by accident. No, there are no accidents in God's Universe. The truth is, God gave each and every one of us what I consider the greatest gift imaginable, aside from Life itself: Free Will.

Will you use that Free Will to respect and honor God, and His creation, by making every attempt in your actions, and in your interactions with others, to obey God's Laws and reflect His Glory? Or will you slap God in the face by becoming an aggressor against others, by trampling the God-given, Unalienable Rights and Liberties of the Individual?

Make no mistake: God-given Rights are bestowed upon each INDIVIDUAL and anyone who violates those rights will be held accountable; even if justice is not done in this earthly life, there is no escape from God's Justice.

Don't "believe" in God? That doesn't change the reality of God's existence, as you will certainly learn – one way or another, sooner or later.

Among those who don't acknowledge the existence of the Creator, the One Almighty God, but rather believe that there are many "gods", or even that they are gods unto themselves, are those who will tell you that there is no "evil" and no "good", no right or wrong, but only the "balance" of Light and Darkness (good and evil) in the universe. Some are so arrogant as to claim that they are "walking the line" in some grey area between the Light and Darkness, to preserve this "balance". According to their strong delusion, in their futile attempts to usurp the very power of God, they have appointed themselves as a sort of Cosmic Police Force to maintain "order" in the universe. These are the persons who believe that the "ends justify the means", and whose aggression knows no bounds. Avoid them like the plague.

It is my belief that aggression is the root of all evil. But before going into detail about some of the acts that comprise aggression, it is necessary to define the nature of aggression. Aggression can be understood, first and foremost, as a LACK OF RESPECT for the privacy, personal boundaries and the Inviolability of Personhood.

I do not approach this subject from a "legal" perspective, nor even from a "religious" angle but rather from a general spiritual/moral/ethical perspective. For my purposes here, I will define a "Person" as any individual human being or other sentient creature. And I do believe that yes, God sees "every sparrow that falls". God sees every act of kindness, compassion and mercy, every act of selfless service to others in accordance with God's Laws, and every act of cruelty, aggression and injustice.

But this report is not about sparrows, it is primarily about the way Persons of the human variety treat one another, and about a Code of Honor, which if scrupulously followed, removes aggression from the equation.

Before you can RESPECT the rights, the liberties, the privacy, the personal boundaries of others, of the INDIVIDUAL, that is, you must first fully ACKNOWLEDGE them.

Communists, socialists, leftists – collectivists of any stripe-- by definition cannot respect the personal boundaries of others, simply because they refuse to even acknowledge them. The so-called "common good" is their hue and cry, and in their false belief that the collective trumps the individual, they don't give a damn about trampling individual rights. But in truth there can be no "common good" as long as the rights of even one individual are being violated. This totalitarian ideology, or tyranny, in any form, is rooted in aggression against the rights and liberties, the privacy and personal boundaries of the Individual Person.

Then, there are the garden variety busybodies, whose aggression may be less extreme and more mundane, but it is aggression all the same. Aggression is a slippery slope, and those who set foot on that path will eventually reach the bottom – at least, without a revelation of truth and a conscious effort to remedy their attitudes and actions, before it is too late.

But it doesn't take an ivory-tower philosopher or religious scholar to see the truth. Anyone with the common sense God gave them may know the difference between right and wrong, between good and evil, between respect for an individual's rights and personal boundaries, and the aggression that violates them.

All that being said, here's a Common Sense Code of Honor, very simple and easy to understand. It is not all encompassing, not by a long shot. Mostly, it is just based on MINDING YOUR OWN BUSINESS and leaving others in peace to tend to theirs. Not overstepping your bounds. Not interfering, not meddling, not engaging in acts of aggression, in any form.


Invade the privacy of another Person.

The Right to Privacy is an integral part of Individual Liberty.

DO NOT EVER: Snoop into the private affairs of others. A Person has the right to keep secrets, if he so chooses. He has the right to the quiet enjoyment of his home, his property, his personal/family relationships, without outside interference.

A Person has the right to keep the physical address of his home, his telephone number, his e-mail address PRIVATE, to protect himself from prying eyes, unwanted public scrutiny and threats to his security and safety.

A Person has the right to privacy in his personal papers and effects. This includes his private journals, emails, audiotapes, videotapes, etc. Anyone who steals these private effects, and/or who willfully invades the privacy of another, by publishing such personal materials, is not only a busybody, but a malicious wrongdoer.

DO NOT EVER: Violate the confidence of a Person who has shared ANY sort of private/sensitive information, by divulging those confidences to others. If someone has trusted you with private information about his life, respect that confidence and keep the information to yourself. Do not be a tale-bearer; do not be a gossip. Loose lips sink ships. They also destroy friendships. Do not become a Town Crier for the private business of others. It's not your place, not your story to tell.

DO NOT EVER: Show up unannounced and uninvited at a Person's home. It is the worst sort of intrusion and the ultimate in rudeness. Unless there is a dire emergency which you KNOW to be the case, or unless that Person has expressly stated that you are welcome to "drop in" anytime without prior notice, DO NOT EVER.

DO NOT EVER: Appoint yourself as a "matchmaker" between other Persons. Do not contact one Person and without the prior knowledge and permission of another Person, try to arrange a meeting, broker a deal, offer your assistance, or otherwise meddle in the business of other Persons. DO NOT EVER become an unwanted intermediary in the business of others.

DO NOT EVER: Give unsolicited advice. This applies across the board, whether it is a friend, a family member or especially, a stranger. Do not take it upon yourself to advise others, unless they have specifically asked. If someone wants your advice, they will ask for it. If they don't, it is not your place to foist it upon them.

DO NOT EVER: Interrogate others about their personal habits, their finances, their relationships or other private matters. Above all, do not be a busybody who tells others how to live their lives; what they "should" or "should not" be believing, doing, spending, drinking, smoking, etc.

DO NOT EVER: Think you have the right to "decide" for another Person in situations where that person may have asked for your assistance. If someone asks for your help, first find out HOW they want and need to be helped, before you take any action. Respect the wishes of those you are helping, rather than taking matters into your own hands. If you are unable or unwilling to help them in the specific ways they request, then say so, and leave them free to seek help elsewhere.

DO NOT EVER: Give a Person an animal for a "pet" without first asking their permission. Many animals end up homeless or in shelters because they were "dumped" on an unwitting recipient by a do-gooder busybody who decided that they "needed" this animal for a companion, or that the animal "needed" a good home, when in fact it may not be a good match for either Person, the animal or the human being.

DO NOT EVER: Presume that you know what is "best" for another Person. Only God knows what is best, and only the Person has the right to decide that for himself. Whether he is "right" or "wrong" is not your place to decide.

DO NOT EVER: Buy a subscription to any publication in another Person's name and have it sent to their mailing address/home address, without first asking permission. Especially, if the Person is a Prisoner, you may be compromising that Person's safety by doing so. Prisoners have been punished (including being placed in solitary confinement) for the indiscretions of do-gooder busybodies who have foolishly sent "incendiary" material addressed to them.

DO NOT EVER: Pay unwanted attention to any Person who has made it clear (either directly or by their silence) that they do not want any dealings or communication with you. DO NOT EVER harass another person with unwanted e-mails. letters, telephone calls.

DO NOT EVER engage in any form of stalking. If a Person has rejected your advances (whether of friendship, "romance", professional business or otherwise) leave that Person in peace!

DO NOT EVER: Bear false witness against another Person, for any reason. Period.

DO NOT EVER: Threaten to, or engage in blackmail of another Person, for any reason.

DO NOT EVER: Use any form of coercion or extortion against another Person.

DO NOT EVER: Draw first blood.

DO NOT EVER: Physically assault another person, except in self defense, or in the defense of others.

DO NOT EVER: Invade the private property, or the country of other Persons.

DO NOT EVER: Wage a war of aggression against other Persons.

DO NOT EVER: Attribute all the evils of the world to any particular race or ethnic origin of Persons, any particular religion of Persons, or to the gender of Persons, making them into scapegoats.

DO NOT EVER promote bigotry and hatred. DO NOT EVER attach blame anywhere but with the specific INDIVIDUAL wrongdoers who perpetrated the offenses or crimes, no matter how many, or how few.

Any group that exists is made up of INDIVIDUALS. Each and every Individual is given the same Free Will by Almighty God.

What will you choose to do with yours?


A Nation of Snoops, Snitches & Busybodies: Tyrannical Government & Monstrous Invasions of Privacy


REAL I.D.: The Death Knell of Personal Privacy

Invasions of Privacy & Meddling: Garden Variety Busybodies

Reflections on Truth, Liberty and the Right to Privacy


Also see: THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY section on this website, where numerous violators of privacy are exposed by name.






Monday, August 2, 2021


"Well, I have owned the mk ultra girl photo. You can't research it without being led to my work. I am not stupid. I know how to influence. So they all know. It is a big hush hush, but they all know me. I have forced change much of this media gong show, but few believe or support me."

"By now it is safe to assume that everybody knows that I lay claim to that image. Others come, others go. Nothing has changed from my POV. IMO, I made the correct decisions from day one. I planted a flag and stood my ground. Others come, others go."

-Ellen Atkin, self-appointed “leader” and “social media influencer”, statements from her monstrous publicity campaign to deceive the public via fraud, evidence tampering, and identity theft, making a false claim that she is “MK Ultra Girl” (birth date 9-17-1953) from a photo taken in 1961

I recently posted a report addressing a “Public Legal Notice to Barbara Hartwell” sent by post to me from Ellen Atkin, which I thoroughly refuted with facts, point by point, and closed with yet another CEASE & DESIST demand regarding Atkin's continuing threats and harassment against me.



I had not bothered locating this document online, though I knew it must be posted, but later found this article by Atkin, which includes links to three such “public legal notices”, against Barbara Hartwell and two other individuals, namely Ann McClean and Julie Gold.

Before I begin ripping this latest defamatory screed to shreds, I should point out several salient items:

~That Ellen Atkin has never once included any FACTS, none whatsoever, when spewing her venom. In promoting her false narrative, she limits herself to false accusations and fabrications, accusing her Targets of engaging in a “conspiracy” against her.

~In this case, Atkin has concocted, and is heavily promoting, a totally baseless accusation of collusion among three separate individuals, Barbara Hartwell, Ann McClean and Julie Gold. Each of whom, at different times, and in various articles, has exposed Ellen Atkin as a fraud. I happen to know that there are many others who recognize the same glaringly obvious truth, albeit they may not have publicized their observations. So, according to Ellen Atkin, just because three individuals have separately arrived at the same conclusion, that must mean there is a “conspiracy” against the actual fraud who has been exposed as such? No logic here, no facts, but certainly nothing new from Ellen Atkin.

~That at the time of my first report, exposing Atkin as a fraud, I did not know, and had never heard of either Julie Gold or Ann McClean, and had not read anything published by either one of these persons.

~That I searched for their names only AFTER Ellen Atkin made her ridiculous false claims that Barbara Hartwell was “cyberstalking” her, under the supposed influence of these persons.

~That I subsequently decided to contact Ann McClean and Julie Gold to alert them to the fact that Atkin was making false accusations against them in connection with my name.

~That I spoke to Julie Gold only once, briefly, on the telephone, and have had no further contact with her since that time, in the early spring of 2020. In one of my reports, I included a brief notice which had been posted by Julie Gold, a warning to all and sundry that Ellen Atkin is an “internet fraudster”. A statement with which I wholeheartedly agreed, based solely on my own observations of the published material of Atkin. Yet, according to Ellen Atkin, this must be a “conspiracy” against her.

~As for Ann McClean (aka Ann Diamond) I contacted her as well, with the same alert. I later, by Ann's permission, posted her article (excerpts), titled MKULTRA GIRL: ANATOMY OF A FRAUD.

And that is the full extent of it, as far as any of my public exposure of Ellen Atkin, in connection with these ladies. There was no collusion, no “conspiracy”. And sure as hell, no “cyberstalking”. I have never in my life (privately, nor publicly) “stalked” anyone. Stalking is an act of aggression and against my principles. But then, principles have no place in Ellen Atkin's skewed world.

No, no, no. No stalking, no collusion, no conspiracy. These absolutely false accusations by Ellen Atkin are libelous fabrications, for which she has NO EVIDENCE whatsoever.

And yet, she obsessively continues this sleazy defamation campaign, with no end in sight. And most recently, is threatening “legal action” against Barbara Hartwell.

I won't presume to speak further about Julie Gold or Ann McClean, except to say that from all I have seen, in my opinion, their published statements about Ellen Atkin, as a fraud, are truthful, accurate and factual. And that here, I speak strictly for myself, as always.

Here is the defamatory article by Ellen Atkin. Again, I can easily refute her false statements, with FACTS.

My comments are given after each paragraph.

Undoing the Cult Psi Op at MK Ultra Girl

by Ellen Atkin

"Since Sept. 2020, I have been laying low in order to straighten out the kinks in the go forward mkultra crime cult exposure plan. I was also emotionally devastated coming back from the Walk With Us rally & documentary 3 week cross country trip to fight for the class action and visit my sister and do my own research when my beloved male cat Boomer (a rare lynx point Siamese) was gone. The dreadful circumstances point to my 87 year old Chinese landlady with deteriorating mental health issues as the cause. So, I had to move or else be consumed with the same rage and grief that has haunted me my whole life because of the mkultra programme and what it did to me and my family."

Ellen Atkin's proclamation of her emotional state has nothing whatsoever to do with me, or anything I have ever publicly stated in reports exposing Atkin. It appears she is baiting the hook with a sob story, in the hope of soliciting sympathy from her audience. And it is totally irrelevant as regards her effrontery in exploiting and defaming my name for her own self-serving, unconscionable ends.

"Life is a metaphor. Like inner, like outer. This is also reflected in the crimes that have sprung up against me SINCE the forming of the class action began. I am victim of a slander campaign that has seriously effected my professional and personal life. Some people may wonder how this can go on. Well ask yourself how the planet got in this mess and it is the same answer."

Here, she waxes philosophical, as phony as a 3 dollar bill, as she calls herself a “victim” of a “slander campaign” and claims that “crimes” (of which she has accused Barbara Hartwell) have been committed against her. Now, she sets the stage to let the false accusations fly.

"When I broke programming, which I chart as Jan. 16th 2016, the day I went public with my mkultra girl history, the first mkultra grifter cult pawn, Ann McClean (aka Diamond) set out to contain me. Her campaign against me was taken up by Julie Tanny Gold, who seeks to represent all the members of the class but has not yet attained official, lead plaintiff status after 3.5 years (wonder why?). Then another internet crank named Barbara Hartwell took it up. This trio can be blamed for the demise of justice for our case."

Here, I must make it clear that I have no reason to believe a word of anything Ellen Atkin says, about “programming", or anything else. Since she has proven to me that she is an abject fraud, and has told so many lies, I can only cite the legal maxim, “falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus”. But now, she drags in the name of Barbara Hartwell, a person she does not know, with whom she has no commonalities in any way, shape or form, to call me an “internet crank” and pin the blame on me for her own dishonesty and flagrant aggression. How utterly despicable.

"Imagine that, the worst crimes post mkultra programming against me, are perped by the very people taking up the cause. What cause, one must ask? Are these people wounded mind controlled fractured multiples operating like puppets to their old mkultra handlers? I say yes. Why would anyone try to kill the goose that laid the golden egg?"

To make it abundantly clear: I share no “cause”, nor ever have done, with Ellen Atkin, contrary to her arrogant and apparently delusional claims. Here, she attempts to lump me in with herself and unnamed others of her ilk, when nothing could be further from the truth. And makes outrageous false accusations of “perps” and “wounded mind controlled fractured multiples operating like puppets to their old mkultra handlers”.

It appears that Atkin is projecting her own twisted psyche upon others, in order to lay the blame on her designated Targets (including Barbara Hartwell) for her own serious psychopathology. Speak for yourself, Atkin. For the record, I have no “handlers”, nor am I anyone's “puppet”.

She then, in her flaming delusional grandiosity, describes herself as “the goose that laid the golden egg”. Can she possibly be serious? Not surprising, as her ego-based boasting and self-glorification is splashed over everything she writes or speaks.

All this, while knowing nothing whatsoever of my professional or personal background. It should be noted that never, once, has Atkin ever been able to produce as much as one actual statement of fact in relation to Barbara Hartwell. Nor has she ever been able to refute even one of my statements. She is in possession of no facts, so she fabricates ludicrous accusations, hoping that if she keeps repeating them, they will stick.

"I have been actively deprogramming for over 5 years, publicly. No mystery there. Thus sprung MK Ultra Girl campaign. A very effective campaign. Effective because I, unlike these other 3, worked around the programme enuf so that I became a professional aerial photographer, self employed, self funded, self motivated. I also spent 2 years as an account executive where I sold millions of dollars of advertising to every facet of professional activity."

Again, Atkin has the effrontery, the hubris, to place me in her own self-designated false category, and dares to make a comparison, where there are NO commonalities, NO similarities whatsoever, past or present, or ever will be, in perpetuity. I couldn't give a tinker's hot damn about her programming or public deprogramming. If she wants to continue to expose herself as a parading fool, with her boasting and posturing, and make a public display of her psychopathology, that is her problem. But none of this idiocy has anything whatsoever to do with me. Leave my name OUT of your paranoid fantasies, you one-woman freak show!

"I spent years building an internet business studying internet marketing. I own good equipment, that I invested in myself and with supporters help. In short, I have proven myself as a consummate professional for over 30 years. Just check out my linked in profile. It is impressive. The puppets, not so much."

Just more of the usual boasting. Who cares? And what does this have to do with the false accusations against Barbara Hartwell, such as calling me a “puppet”? Nothing, as usual.

"However, the despicable malice openly enacted by the puppets is but a mirror of the attitudes my fallen family enact. I have taken up the responsibility for the entire inner and outer families lack of it. For that I have been kid gloved by the system controlling the family, but they would never be so stupid to entrap themselves for all the world to see. No they just hide like parasites behind the money they stole from my mother's inheritance on her side and silence from the other."

What in the bloody hell! Again, Atkin has the gall to drag my name, referring to me as a “puppet” and “parasite” (how dare you, you loathsome creature!) into her own sordid family history, and accuse me of “mirroring” their attitudes. No way in hell, and I have no interest in her family. The only fact I know of, which has been published, is that her sister is a convicted murderer. Atkin is way out of line here. This is absolute calumny, to compare me to such reprobates.

"The class action lawsuit is finished as a tool for justice. It is nothing but a containment field against me, clearly. Me and my sister (disabled since 16 years old when she got 13 shock treatments and her lifelong prescription drug addiction for displaying bipolar tendencies) are the smoking guns to the grandest exposure of the mkultra program in Canada. I can imagine that if Justin Trudeau began deprogramming publicly would there be such a powerful comparison to my story."

Naturally, as always, Ellen Atkin places herself at the center of the action, claiming there is a “containment field” around her. If there's not, maybe there should be; it might serve as a form of damage control, to stop her from running amok, bulldozing her way into the business of total strangers, making outrageous claims and spreading vile falsehoods.

"So, the next step in this freak show is to deliver legal notices to the puppets. The first and second rounds to charging the puppets are underway. It will mean the dissolution of the class action, but that has to happen. We are 4 years into the process and it can be summed up as a negative return. We don't have a lawsuit, we have a sullen TBMC slave destroying people's reputations while she sucks the life out of all the time and energy of effective creative forward momentum by a few individuals who are actually doing all the work for the lawsuit. When ever a victory happens it is not from her actions, but she takes credit for it. This can't go on."

Yes indeed, the freak show. Starring the one and only MK Ultra Girl, Ellen Atkin. Who will soon be “charging the puppets”.

"Personally, I am secure but not secure enuf while the shifting sands of time try to bury all truth everywhere. I can finally focus back on my professional life after months of real action I had to undertake to elevate my position. Thank you to my supporters who are the very best people. I am now in a much better position to move forward. I had to secure a very important aspect of my case and I did. I will reveal later as it is very sensitive and will spell the end of the cult against me, if the demons don't destroy me, which they won't. But if they do, you know the truth. Then I guess I will be martyr which will be used against the truth just like all the martyrs the cult has created to control the future.

For now, I can't see that happening. There is only one MK Ultra Girl."

Now, she's in danger of becoming a martyr, as demons try to destroy her? There is a “cult” out to get her?

I think it's a fair guess that Ellen Atkin is seriously, seriously, delusional. But that is not my problem. No quarter asked, none given.


Get the hell off my case, Atkin. NOW. Or take the consequences.

And yes, there is only one “MK Ultra Girl”, as shown in the photo of an 8 year old girl, taken in 1961, whose birthday is September 17, 1953.

And I can guaran-damn-tee, it is NOT Ellen Atkin.

Barbara Hartwell

Target of the One Woman Freak Show, Ellen Atkin

August 2, 2021


Friday, July 30, 2021



I received by post a document, dated June 22, 2021, sent by one Ellen Atkin. It is titled:

Public Legal Notice to Barbara Hartwell

from Ellen Atkin

I have scanned/copied the entire document (two double-sided pages) and the envelope. I will give only excerpts here.

The purpose of this report is to soundly and definitively refute the many false claims and injurious accusations of Ellen Atkin, and to expose her (once again) as a fraud, a liar, and malicious aggressor, engaging in harassment and now, making threats of “legal action”.

First, there is nothing “legal” about this “Public Legal Notice”. Atkin, lacking all authority to do so, has simply fabricated a list of bogus “charges”, all of which are entirely baseless.

Furthermore, Atkin's attempt to engage me directly by sending this threatening notice to me by post is regarded as harassment. I hereby put Atkin on public notice that any further attempts at direct communication (by post or otherwise) will be reported as harassment, having been designated as unwanted communications by me. There will be no direct communications to Ellen Atkin, only public reports exposing such harassment and any other offenses, as they are committed by Ellen Atkin.

If I should receive any further mail by post from Ellen Atkin, or by any of her associates/accomplices it will be marked REFUSED by the post office and RETURNED TO SENDER.

Here, I have copied portions (excerpts) of the document. My rebuttals follow.

"I, Ellen Atkin, of Boston Bar, BC, VOK 1CO, do hereby put Barbara Hartwell of no fixed address, USA, on formal legal notice in regards to charges of defamation, slander, conspiracy and libel.


Barbara Hartwell has made several (5 noted on this document) rambling blog posts on her free google blog(s) that I, Ellen Atkin am a fraud, a liar, an identity thief and worse. I, Ellen Atkin, rebuke her baseless accusations. To make these accusations publicly is itself a crime. Accusing another of crimes with no evidence is itself a crime. Ms. Hartwell states:

"I have exposed Ellen Atkin in several reports, as a liar, a fraud, an identity thief, an aggressive and ambitious opportunist and rabid publicity hound."

Barbara Hartwell is amply aware of her intentions to cause me and my family harm with baseless accusations. I do hereby charge Barbara Hartwell with the very serious crimes of libel, slander, defamation and conspiracy."

Atkin here accuses me of various “crimes”. Under what authority to level such charges? What statutes? In the United States, or Canada? If “crimes” have been committed, why does she not cite the specific criminal codes?

Answer: Ellen Atkin, in her ignorance of any laws, makes false and injurious accusations, with ZERO evidence to back up her claims. If she has “reported” such “crimes” to lawful authorities, anywhere, I have not heard of it. What's more, if she has done any such thing, then she has made a false police report, which IS most certainly a crime.

Ellen Atkin presumes to make a statement with no basis in fact, regarding Barbara Hartwell's “awareness” and “intentions”. This is pure subjective speculation, along with malicious intent to misrepresent Barbara Hartwell, and as such, holds no veracity, much less authority.

Atkin states:

"To make these accusations publicly is itself a crime. Accusing another of crimes with no evidence is itself a crime."

Again, Atkin displays her ignorance of the law. Which crimes? Under which system of law? Under what authority?

I have committed no crimes against Ellen Atkin and she has no “legal” standing, much less authority, to make such a statement.


Barbara Hartwell spreads false information to the general public as of this day via her personal free website(s), about me, Ellen Atkin. She seeks to cause harm to my reputation personally and professionally."

In point of fact, I have never, at any time, spread “false information” about Ellen Atkin. I have stated my opinions, as a journalist, upon information and belief, based solely on Atkin's own published articles, and her false claims, including that of claiming the identity, as herself, of a published photograph of a child (taken 1961), whose birthdate is given, on the original photo, as 9/17/1953. This has been established as a fact.

After aggressively staking her (false) claim (identity theft), Atkin then tampered with the photograph, in obvious efforts to deceive the public, by changing the original, removing text, and adding her own fraudulent text and comments, along with what she claims is a childhood photo of herself. This is known in legal terms as spoliation. She has destroyed evidence (the original photo) for the purpose of advancing a false claim. And yes, she has purposely committed an act of identity theft.

Furthermore, she herself openly admitted in a video, that she “does not know” if the photograph is of her. She further stated, that “nobody knows”, presuming to speak for all and sundry, for all time, which is a blatantly false statement. The only relevant statement from Atkin was that SHE DOES NOT KNOW. And that says it all.

And yet, in direct contradiction of her own admission, she has continued to promote the baldfaced lie, in many venues (including her website, “MK Ultra Girl”, on social media, in radio/podcasts) that she, Ellen Atkin, is the “REAL MK Ultra Girl”.

And yes, this is indeed obstruction of justice. In that, a real person, a real victim of MK Ultra atrocities (whoever she may actually be), has had her true identity and horrific plight usurped and exploited by an opportunistic fraud, thus depriving the real victim of any justice, should she, or her family, choose to seek it. Or for that matter, any interested persons seeking justice for victims/survivors of MK Ultra.

"This is Barbara Hartwell's first notice from myself, Ellen Atkin, to retract her statement against me."

To which singular “statement” does she refer? I have been falsely accused of making a number of “statements”. For the record, no statements made by me in reference to Ellen Atkin, will be retracted.


Barbara Hartwell conspired with Ann McClean to libel, slander and defame my name with no evidence other than the malicious intent of Ann McClean. Ms. Hartwell takes up the task fervently by accusing me of fraud, grifting, lieing [misspelled by Atkin] ,obstructing justice and identity theft with NO evidence."

I have never, at any time, “conspired with Ann McClean”, or anyone else, for any purpose, in regard to Ellen Atkin. As stated in previous reports (see links below) I did not know Ann McClean (aka Ann Diamond) at the time I published my first report exposing Ellen Atkin. My report was based solely on the published writings of Ellen Atkin.


Barbara Hartwell has slandered, libeled, defamed and discredited my name publicly (Ellen Atkin has done legitimate business online for over a decade. Ellen Atkin continues to do legitimate business online.)

I charge Barbara Hartwell with malicious intent to cause my professional business to falter or cease altogether. I, Ellen Atkin, have had to rebuke inquiries as to my credibility both personally and professionally because of the wilful [misspelled by Atkin] harm to discredit my name."

Atkin's claim of “legitimate business online” is vague, and irrelevant, as it has nothing to do with any of my reports exposing Ellen Atkin, on specific grounds. And, for the record, I have no reason to believe that Atkin has any legitimacy whatsoever. There has been no “malicious intent” in relation to Atkin's so-called “professional business”. I know nothing about that and could not care less. My only concern has ever been Atkin's fraud and lies in relation to her utterly bogus claims, and her subsequent lies about Barbara Hartwell, once she was exposed.


Barbara Hartwell has repeated Ann McClean's slander about me, word for word, I charge Barbara Hartwell with malicious intent to cause other internet publishers of the MK Ultra genre to repeat, embellish and foment an extraordinary basket of lies, slander, defamation and libel directed at my name, Ellen Atkin specifically using the word Fraud. (Ramola D did just that) Accusing someone of fraud with no evidence is a very serious crime."

I am aware of no “slander” published about Ellen Atkin from Ann McClean, nor anyone else. Nor have I “repeated” any statements from Ann McClean, including “word for word”.


I have published an article by Ann McClean (aka Ann Diamond) exposing the truth about Ellen Atkin, which I found to be factually accurate, and with which I am in basic agreement.

As for “evidence”, her opinion of what constitutes evidence is seriously flawed. The photo of “MK Ultra Girl”, which Atkin has stolen and appropriated for personal gain is itself hard evidence of fraud on the part of Ellen Atkin. (See my previous reports for clarification.)

As for “other internet publishers” on MK Ultra, they are legion. More to the point, such publishers have nothing to do with me, my website, or my reports. I speak strictly for myself, based on my own professional investigations and standards, and my opinions, viewpoints on any subject matter (including MK Ultra) are strictly my own. There has never been any “malicious intent” on my part to “cause” anyone to repeat anything published by me. And I am not responsible in any way for the stated opinions or published material of others.


I do formally charge Barbara Hartwell with conspiracy in the case of responding to Ann McClean's intentions to harass and cyberstalk me and my associates, which has occurred and stands today on Ms. Hartwell's free google blog."

At no time have I “responded” to any form of intent, by Ann McClean, or anyone else, to “harass and cyberstalk” Ellen Atkin or her associates. Furthermore, I have seen no such intent from Ann McClean, nor have I ever personally engaged in any form of cyberstalking or harassment. I have simply published reports exposing the fraud of Ellen Atkin, as in my opinion, has Ann McClean. If Atkin regards this as a conspiracy, she apparently needs to get herself educated on the actual meanings of the words, “harassment” and “cyberstalking”. And it might behoove her to remedy her vast ignorance of the law.


Barbara Hartwell has repeated the lies and slander of Julie Tanny Gold by republishing the lies JTG published about me. This has served to discredit my family's very real participation in the Montreal Experiments Class Action lawsuit. Our lawyers at Consumer Law Group are in possession of the evidence offenders claim I do not possess. This has served to discredit the entire lawsuit but mostly it has harmed me and my family."

I am aware of no lies and slander published by Julie Tanny Gold. I merely cited her comments (with which I am in agreement, based on my own research of the published material of Ellen Atkin) that Ellen Atkin is a “fraudster”.

I have no interest whatsoever in any lawsuits in which Atkin, or anyone associated with her, may be involved. Nor have I published anything in relation to those lawsuits, nor about any “evidence” anyone claims she does not have. I am not involved in any way, shape or form. It is not my concern. None of this has anything to with me, or my reports exposing Ellen Atkin for the fraud she is.


Ellen Atkin seeks to resolve the issues of this notice by having Barbara Hartwell issue a formal written retraction and apology of her libel, slander, conspiracy and defamation sent to me, Ellen Atkin [e-mail address deleted] AND made public on her website(s) and her social media accounts and stand forth for a period of 2 years."


If no such resolution is forthcoming within a period of 2 weeks from this date, Monday, June 22, 2021, then I Ellen Atkin, will pursue further legal action against Barbara Hartwell."


I, Ellen Atkin, seek to pursue this matter to a fair and just conclusion for the highest benefit of all parties concerned within 2 weeks of this date, June 22, 2021."

Ellen Atkin, clearly, is not only a fraud and a liar, she must be seriously delusional if she believes she can threaten me with “legal action”, based on her crackpot “conspiracy” theory of nonexistent collusion to stalk, slander, libel, etc. etc.

There will be no apology and no retractions. Absolutely not. How dare this odious harridan even suggest such a thing! All material published by me will stand, as is. If Ellen Atkin tries to strong-arm any publisher of my material, to censor and delete my reports, as she did to Ann McClean, I will simply publish them elsewhere. This is the typical tactic of cowards and bullies, trying to use censorship to cover up the truth.

The only “resolution” coming from me will be to continue, in righteous outrage, to expose Atkin as the fraud, liar and aggressive opportunist she is.

As for Atkin's claim of “her social media accounts”, I do not use social media, and never have done.

She speaks, foolishly and absurdly, of “all parties concerned”. I am not concerned in any way with any “parties” to whom she refers.

It is now July 30. Atkin's threatened “deadline” is long passed, but is absolutely meaningless to me. I can only surmise that Atkin will now continue with her harassment, with more threats of “legal action”.

And so I will close by repeating my previous demand to Ellen Atkin:


Barbara Hartwell

July 30, 2021




FRAUD ALERT: Ellen Atkin aka “MK Ultra Girl”

MKULTRA GIRL: Anatomy of a Fraud

Continuing Malicious Lies, False Accusations & Fraud by Ellen Atkin

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE by Ellen Atkin aka “MK Ultra Girl”: Fraud, Liar, Identity Thief, Opportunist... & Whackjob Accomplices