"You
are the father of the revolutions on this continent, you are our
father."
– Hugo
Chavez to Fidel Castro (2007)
"Let's
save the human race, let's finish off the U.S. Empire."
– Hugo
Chavez: On teaming up with Iran to take down America
"Since
Hugo Chavez was leading his country, boldly, in a manner that
distinguished his leadership from the lockstep, pro-American arse
licking that typifies most of the world’s statesmen at this
juncture in time, one might ask if the power elite specifically
bogarded the cure from Hugo Chavez."
– Janet
Phelan, excerpt from Hugo Chavez, World Leaders and Cancer
Deaths—Indications that the Cure Exists (For a Chosen Few)
Journalist
Janet Phelan has passed away. I'm not sure exactly when this
happened, I only read that it was sometime in January of this year.
I
had conducted a search for her name, simply because I noticed that my
reports exposing her as a leftist agitator, a supporter of communist
despots and adversary of Barbara Hartwell (a hard-line Law-and-Order
conservative) were getting many more views than usual. It occurred to
me that she might have died, and that turned out to be correct.
I
was saddened to hear of Janet's death, even considering that she was
a political adversary who spent her entire career as a journalist and
activist advocating for a collectivist New World Order agenda
(including supporting the evil United Nations, and attending their
meetings), and who did considerable unwarranted damage to my name and
reputation, personally and professionally. But, ill-advised as it may
have been, I once considered her a friend. I pray for her soul to
rest in peace, that is all I can do.
But
in service to the truth, and in the pursuit of justice, it is always
important to me to set the record straight, providing the facts and
evidence for the public record. Because, there are those supporters
of Janet Phelan who will now be promoting her as a
heroic
figure (which she was not) and denigrating her adversaries (including
Barbara Hartwell) in order to promulgate their own agenda, the
establishment of “progressive” (read Marxist) values, where the
rights of the individual are negated in service to the collective.
Just
to name two of her most vocal supporters, devil-worshiper Howard
Nemaizer and former NSA Karen Stewart, in collusion with Janet
Phelan, have both promoted outrageous defamatory lies against Barbara
Hartwell, including accusing me of being CIA.
[FACT:
I left CIA operations in 1994, never to return. But false accusers
abound. Having no legitimate claims against me, these characters are
all the same: they revert to the old standby: She's CIA! Once CIA,
always CIA!]
Due
to the public stand I have taken, uncompromising in defense of the
God-given unalienable rights of the individual, as
protected under the Constitution, I have many enemies, some of
whom are former friends and/or professional associates. And all of
whom I ended my association with, on principle, because I could not,
in good conscience, support, promote or endorse their actions, their
publicly stated political views and/or their unwarranted interference
in my personal/professional business.
In
most cases, it was also because they showed no respect whatsoever for
my privacy or personal boundaries, even after I made it clear that I
had zero tolerance for their meddling and gossip. Nosy, pushy, and
aggressive as hell, they revealed themselves to be busybodies and
collectivists, whose beliefs and attitudes were absolutely
antithetical to all that I hold dear, all that I hold sacred, all
that I stand for, all that I have shed blood, sweat and tears
defending: God-given unalienable Rights and Individual Liberty.
Anyone
who takes the time to do a search on my professional track record,
based on my writings on the Internet, my radio broadcasts
(terrestrial and otherwise) would be able to establish that I have
been entirely consistent over a period of more than 30 years, as a
hard-line, Law-and-Order conservative, a defender of Liberty and
Individual God-given Rights, as well as a devout Christian, a
minister of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. That is where I stand, as I
always have done, and always will.
I
should make it clear up front that never did I hold malice in my
heart against Janet Phelan. But I did have righteous outrage against
her anti-Liberty politics and her unjust defamation against my good
name, which began in 2012, when I broke off my association with her,
for cause.
Janet
had first contacted me in 2005, after reading my reports exposing a
government-sponsored stooge, a stalker named Timothy Patrick White
aka Tim White. The late Tim White was a career criminal, a predicate
felon who became a fed snitch in exchange for a reduction of time in
his prison sentence. This is very typical for corrupt feds, to issue
a get-out-of-jail-free card so they can exploit criminals for their
own ends. White was tasked with harassing and threatening targets,
persons the government wanted neutralized.
White,
a lackey of the FBI (specifically the JTTF, Denver, of agents Mark
Hostlaw and “retired” FBI Chief Ted Gunderson) was sicced on me
in 2001. After conducting my own investigation (which included
traveling to Denver in 2002 to interview witnesses), I exposed him in
a series of reports. I produced documented evidence, including police
reports, testimony of those he had targeted for harassment,
restraining orders, and rap sheets.
Tim
White harassed, stalked, threatened, and promoted outrageous
defamatory lies against Barbara Hartwell for nearly 2 decades, until
his death in March, 2019.
I'm
not sure why White targeted Janet Phelan. Most targets of these
corrupt feds were former intelligence, military, law enforcement,
whistleblowers, American patriots and conservative journalists –those
exposing and standing up against government corruption and tyranny.
To
make it very clear, Janet Phelan was not any kind of whistleblower,
she was not a patriot, not a defender of the Constitution (quite the
contrary, though she was a hypocrite and opportunist on that score).
Her entire career had been her advocacy for a “progressive”,
secular humanist agenda and her support for the worst of the worst
leftist politicians and socialist dictators, such as Hugo Chavez
(barf bag alert!).
But
she was very active on the Internet, and especially as a radio
broadcaster and guest on various programs, some of which were in
“conservative” and “patriot” circles.
I
do know that the first contact between Tim White and Janet Phelan
was not adversarial. From what I observed, she lacked discernment and
would associate with just about anyone who would give her publicity.
It
was after Janet cut off contact with White that she contacted me,
having read my reports exposing White as a fed snitch.
I
subsequently developed a friendship with Janet, based on what I
thought were common interests. I was wrong. I later realized that
despite the fact that she was vocal in standing up against Jew-haters
(she was Jewish), she was basically a dyed-in-the-wool left-wing
agitator. Her political views were so opposed to mine, in every way,
that never the twain shall meet. Irreconcilable differences to
continue any professional association, or friendship.
But
as is true with every leftist I have ever known, they are all
busybodies who just cannot respect the personal boundaries of others.
They are gate-crashers with zero respect for the rights of the
individual.
If
it is one thing I have learned, over a decades-long career, both in
CIA operations (1969-1994), as an advocacy journalist, and as a
combatant in the Cold War, it is this: The Left (Socialism,
Communism, National Socialism of Nazis -yes, that is Leftist too)
destroys everything it touches. These systems are all totalitarian,
anti-Christian, anti-Liberty.
All
that the totalitarian Left promotes, supports and endorses is evil,
oppressive, ugly as sin. Just take a look at Soviet era buildings,
modern “artwork” (which is anything BUT art). The Left is
anti-Christ, anti-Liberty, anti-American. I stand against these evil
totalitarians, and will fight to the death against them.
And
this, all this...this was what Janet Phelan spent her entire
career promoting. And like most of her fellow travelers, she was a
True Believer, actually thinking she was “making the world a better
place”.
RAMOLA DHARMARAJ PROMOTES JANET PHELAN
Here,
one of her supporters, another leftist, Ramola Dharmaraj (who also
accuses Barbara Hartwell of being CIA), promotes Janet Phelan.
https://everydayconcerned.net/2017/08/11/janet-phelanamerican-journalist-365-days-and-holding-human-rights-agencies-support-us-human-rights-abuses/
Janet
Phelan wrote:
"It
is one of my core beliefs that we are put on this earth to try to
make it a better place, a place where life and art and love and
beauty and faith can flourish. I am facing challenges now in simply
staying alive and it is with some reluctance that I find I must now
try to bring more attention to myself. I frankly abhor doing so. But
given the challenges that are now facing my continued existence, I am
asking those reading this to be please be aware that yet another
journalist is under significant attack and those who have pledged to
protect human rights in the Americas won’t do a damn thing about
it."
No,
Janet Phelan. You've got it all wrong. Human rights are INDIVIDUAL
RIGHTS. NOT collective rights, issued by some godless entity like the
United Nations.
Human
Rights are God-given, thus unalienable.
If
you truly want to “make the world a better place”, as you claim,
then it has to start, first and foremost, with RESPECTING the
personal boundaries and God-given rights of others.
A
PERSONAL MEMOIR IN DEFENSE OF INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS
EXCERPT
(2014):
I'm
aware that this next section may shock some of my regular readers.
Janet Phelan and I had a longstanding professional association and
personal friendship (2005-2012), so it pains me to write this, but as
I have reflected on developing events over the past few years, I find
it necessary to address this issue openly and definitively, primarily
because she was for such a long time a “known associate” of
Barbara Hartwell.
As
always, in all things, it is important to me to set the public record
straight, once and for all. And unfortunately, I have good reason to
believe that misunderstandings have arisen among some of those who
are mutual acquaintance of mine and Janet Phelan's, especially those
in the media. I realize I may lose friends over this, but the way I
see it, those who are true friends will remain friends; others will
fall by the wayside, which is to be expected –I long ago became
accustomed to the loss of friendships for standing up for my
principles.
I
believe it is relevant to say that Janet Phelan, at least during the
time I've known her, has been a far more prolific contributor of
writings on the Internet than I, and no doubt a more “popular”
one. Her work has been more widely published and distributed via
various venues such as discussion groups, social media, and as a
regular columnist on a number of high-traffic, commercial
publications,
and also very active on the Internet radio circuit. As I've heard her
remark in one of her recent broadcasts [with Howard Nema aka
Nemaizer], she has gathered a large “following”.
My
work, on the other hand, given that I don't seek publicity, don't
engage in self-promotion, don't join groups, has been mainly limited
to my own website, and a few highly selective others. I also believe
that my writings appeal to a much smaller audience, given my
“straight and narrow”, brutally blunt (considered offensive by
many, I've been told), hard-line focus.
And
then, there is the fact that as a government whistleblower, I have
been targeted for a massive, organized, long-running libel/slander
campaign, with the objective of discrediting my work, while
assassinating my character and defaming my good name. (If you don't
believe this, just put my name into any search engine and see what
comes up. Or, see PART ONE of this report for just a small sample of
the defamatory material.)
Most
importantly, I have reached the point where, being a hard-core,
uncompromising defender of God-given, unalienable INDIVIDUAL rights
and liberties, a position I have steadfastly held for decades, I
cannot afford to be silent about the hypocrisy of those persons who
claim to be "protectors” or “defenders” of human rights;
who complain bitterly about the loss of their own "constitutional
rights", while doing nothing at all to defend those rights. Who
claim to be adhering to "moral absolutes", while actually
practicing moral relativism, social engineering and situational
ethics. Who are operating on a double standard for self-serving,
opportunistic goals, especially involving 'agenda politics', and
specifically advocating left-wing agendas which are designed to
destroy national sovereignty and "regulate" God-given
unalienable rights (which can't be done!), through such godless
communist institutions as the United Nations.
Where,
pray tell, in the U.S. Constitution, does it say that any State of
the Union, or any citizen of the several States, must submit to the
authority or jurisdiction of the U.N.? Nowhere! The U.N. has NO
jurisdiction, NO authority in these united States. Furthermore, no
U.N. “treaties” have any lawful authority if they are
countermanded, or their terms prohibited, by what is written in the
Constitution.
This
Cursed Beast, this Spawn of Satan, the U.N., didn't even exist in
1787, and these usurpers have no business whatsoever encroaching as
much as a micro-millimeter into this Constitutional Republic,
meddling in the affairs of this sovereign nation.
This
Republic was founded as a "government of the people, by the
people and for the people", strictly by the “consent of the
governed." NOT to be ruled by global elitists, secret societies,
international banking cartels, multi-national corporations, or by
invasion of foreign busybodies into the body politic, with their
diabolical scheme of locking down their New World Order, where all
power is centralized in a One World government.
All
genuine patriots who defend the Constitution, and the God-given
unalienable rights protected therein, have been shouting at the top
of their lungs for well over half a century, to get the U.S. the hell
OUT of this bastion of vile communism, New Age secular humanism, and
globalist totalitarianism aka the New World Order. (And I give the
John Birch Society credit where it is due, for leading the charge,
these many years.)
For
those who are unaware of the truly sinister nature of the United
Nations, its alliances with Luciferian/New Age cults (such as Lucis
Trust, formerly “Lucifer” Trust), its flagrant anti-Christian
doctrines and practices, its total disrespect for INDIVIDUAL rights
and PRIVATE property (I could go on...and on....), I can only say
BEWARE.
While
many will continue to buy into the pervasive propaganda that the U.N.
is benign and promotes peace, cooperation and justice, those who want
the truth about the U.N. may easily find it by taking the time to do
your own research. (There is no substitute!) And for those
uninterested in the truth, you will, for declining to take personal
responsibility in seeking truth, and failure to stand in defense of
truth, get exactly what you asked for: slavery under globalist
totalitarianism.
What
here, is the relevance of the U.N.? Janet Phelan regularly has truck
with the U.N., including attending and participating in their
conventions, and supporting and advocating their policies and
"treaties". She writes articles promoting the U.N., in
which she attempts, using obviously deceptive left-wing rhetoric, to
persuade the readers into agreement with their UN-American agenda.
(Pun intended.)
But
at the same time, she can be heard loudly complaining of the U.S.
government's violations of “constitutional rights” and
“unconstitutional” policies. Like many others of this ilk, she
seems to think she can have it both ways. She can't have it both
ways. She can't cherry pick the Constitution to support her leftist
agenda, but seems hell-bent on doing exactly that. More on this later
in this report...
In
2012 I broke off my association with Janet Phelan (to be clear, the
decision was mutual), due to "irreconcilable differences".
Speaking strictly for myself, this decision on my part followed a
pattern of behavior by Janet Phelan, which by my observations and
experience, had become increasingly presumptuous, manipulative, pushy
and intrusive; and which displayed a profound disrespect of my
privacy and personal boundaries; and which ultimately pushed me to
the limits of what I was able and willing to tolerate from a person
who called herself my friend.
But
more than that, she insulted my honor, by accusing me of
"misreporting" events (I did no such thing); of trying to
"rationalize" in connection with events (I did no such
thing); of "attacking" her in a public venue (I did no such
thing), and most of all, by calling me a "faithless friend".
That is a matter of subjective personal judgment, one with which I
vehemently disagree.
I
must say, I will not allow these untruths to stand, but will speak
up, for the public record, in defense of my honor, and of all that I
stand for, all that I have worked for, fought for and sacrificed for,
these many years. After all I have lost (between 2010 and 2013, in an
unprecedented series of disasters, nearly all the personal property I
owned, including my house), after all the massive damages inflicted
on me by the government and their minions, in my battles for Liberty
and Justice --the one thing I have left intact is my honor. And I
will not stand by silently when someone (anyone) attempts to sully my
honor with gratuitous and unwarranted allegations and insults which
comprise a gross misrepresentation of my character –especially if
that person's name has had a longstanding connection to mine in
media, as a “known associate”.
As
any person of spiritual/intellectual discernment should be able to
perceive (whatever you may make of it), this is not solely a
"personal" issue – far from it – but rather a matter of
principle, and an issue of widely divergent and seriously conflicting
beliefs and standards, and of what it has become clear are
diametrically opposed political ideologies and moral imperatives.
Of
which those of Barbara Hartwell stand uncompromisingly for God-given
unalienable INDIVIDUAL rights and liberties, as protected under the
Constitution.
And
of which those of Janet Phelan would subvert those individual rights
and liberties, and further, dismiss the most fundamental principles
of Liberty on which this nation was founded, in service to the New
World Order/U.N. agenda of collectivism, a consensus-based 'herd'
mentality, and the so-called "common good" (Nanny State) of
globalist totalitarianism.
To
sum it up, my level of "irreconcilable differences" with
Janet Phelan's political ideology? Agitators for this left-wing
agenda will conquer this nation, and trample MY rights, over my dead
body. And as long as I have breath in my body, I will fight for those
rights, against any and all who would attempt to mitigate or
compromise them. Liberty or Death. Don't Tread on Me.
In
short, Janet Phelan, I have come to believe after much reflection on
events, circumstances, and the interactions I have participated in
and/or observed over a period of years, is an agitator for globalist
government. That is my considered professional opinion, for the
public record.
LEFTIST
PROPAGANDA & THE COMPROMISES OF COWARDS
This
is taken from my archives. It uses Janet Phelan and her friend,
Howard Nemaizer, as examples of the foolishness and hypocrisy of
embracing the false “protection” of rights by Leftism.
NOTE:
This brief commentary is a segment from an old report, but I find
that it is a perfect example of the reason this country has fallen to
the evils of Progressivism and “wokeism” (read Marxism):
Too
many people are wimpy, spineless hypocrites and compromisers. They
claim to be defenders of Liberty and human rights, but their actions
tell another story.
The
two individuals exposed here are Janet Phelan and Howard Nemaizer,
and the readers may decide for themselves whether they have any
credibility, and are deserving of any support, or if they have earned
the contempt of those Liberty-loving patriots, hard-liners who will
actually fight to the death for what we believe, in service to the
truth, and to leave a legacy of freedom to our grandchildren.
Here
is an irrefutable FACT:
No
person who endorses, defends, supports, advocates for, or promotes
the United Nations, in any way, shape, or form, can ever be
considered as a patriot, a defender of Liberty, the US Constitution,
or human rights.
This
applies especially to anyone who would appeal to the UN to intercede
for any reason, when in fact the UN has no jurisdiction over
these united States, and cannot lawfully countermand the US
Constitution.
Anyone
who does not know this, or who makes excuses (for any reason) is
either woefully ignorant of the law, or hopes to bypass the law for
an unscrupulous agenda.
In
any case, they lack the moral courage to act on the convictions to
which they lay claim, and are the enemies of those who will fight to
the death for Liberty, with no compromises. They serve only the cause
of slavery and totalitarianism, rather than being advocates of
God-given, unalienable human rights, as protected under the
Constitution.
They
are certainly my enemies, and as always, I will fight
everything they stand for, and will continue to expose them for their
unscrupulous, self-serving, hypocritical behavior.
Shame
on them for their cowardice and hypocrisy, and may God's swift and
terrible justice be visited upon them.
Barbara
Hartwell
May
1, 2024
EXCERPT
FROM REPORT (2017)
Globalism
by Deception & Hypocrisy: Left Wing Agitators Destroy America
http://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2017/10/globalism-by-deception-hypocrisy-left.html
It's
time to wrap up this segment. Just one quick anecdote regarding a
discussion I had with Howard Nemaizer (2013), regarding the nature of
the political ideology espoused by Janet Phelan. As previously
stated, I did not bring up Janet Phelan's name to Howard after I had
broken off my association with her. I had said what I considered
necessary, and had no reason to revisit the issue.
But
one day I was having a discussion with Howard in which I outlined my
strict dedication to the principles of Liberty and God-given
unalienable individual rights. Howard's idea was that “everyone
sees things in a different way”. True, but if the way they “see”
things means that they will violate the unalienable rights of others,
fail to respect the privacy, the personal boundaries of others, or
try to force their viewpoints on others, then no true defender of
Liberty will tolerate such behavior. They may “see” it as they
will, but that right to “see” morphs into wrongdoing when they
fail to respect the rights of others, or take action to trample the
rights of others.
Howard
brought up Janet Phelan, in an apparent attempt to persuade me of the
value of what she had to offer in terms of defending human rights and
related issues. My answer was as follows: You cannot claim to be a
“defender” or “protector” of “rights” if you fail to
acknowledge the ultimate supremacy of the God-given unalienable
rights of the INDIVIDUAL.
Janet
Phelan, by her own admission, and by her many statements advocating
for the U.N. and “left-wing politics” (her own words) is in favor
of compromising, modifying, adulterating the rights of the individual
in service to the dictates of a collective.
And
finally, in terms of a clear overview, I explained my position by
asking Howard to consider this scenario:
One
person (for example, in this case, Janet Phelan) decides that she
will dedicate much time and effort in attempts to influence people
(via her writings, radio appearances, etc.) to believe that left-wing
ideology is not only acceptable, but preferable; that it has merit in
that it contains solutions to various problems; will result in
improving the lives of the citizens of a country, will “affirm our
basic humanity”, and so on and so forth...
As
a result of her efforts, some of the audience she is addressing
(those who lack discernment and don't think for themselves) are
actually influenced to join in and support what she is promoting. And
remember, according to Janet, she already has a “large following”.
(This statement was in fact made on Howard Nema's show.) Her work is
posted on numerous large commercial sites on the Internet, spanning
an entire spectrum from those who profess “conservatism” to those
who are openly leftist, New Age, secular humanist.
(And
remember, Janet Phelan is only one person. How many others are there,
embracing and promoting the same ideology?)
Over
time, more and more people jump on the Leftist Bandwagon, and soon
they themselves are spouting the same ideology, and become agitators,
not only by their words, but now by their actions. (For example, they
get sucked in by the rhetoric, and join the 'Occupy' movement.)
Soon,
as the mob of leftists gains momentum, U.N. Treaties gain
signatories. Legislation that defies the Constitution is passed. A
person's right to keep and bear
arms is “signed away” by meddlers from the U.N. Now, the
unconstitutional legislation becomes “law”.
What's
next? The U.N. decides that they have the right to invade our
sovereign republic with impunity, for the “common good”, to
“protect human rights”, to “keep the peace”. (After all, the
welcome mat has been rolled out, is ready and waiting for such an
invasion.)
Meanwhile,
the criminals run rampant, because criminals don't respect the law,
nor anyone's unalienable rights (never have, never will) and they
still have guns and ammo, which they will use in assaults against the
citizenry. Robbery, rape, murder, mayhem, all at the point of THEIR
guns.
But
where are YOUR guns and ammo? Nowhere to be found, they've been
confiscated by lawless men (or women) with badges and guns (operating
under the color of law), who are “just following orders”, orders
given by tyrants who themselves are “following orders”, the
directives of even bigger tyrants at the top of the global food
chain.
This
is how totalitarianism is achieved, by recruiting one individual at a
time, then groups of individuals, using propaganda (especially
manipulation by engendering guilt: It's for the children, for the
disenfranchised; for the elderly; for the disabled, etc. etc.),
pressure tactics, and finally, threats.
At
long last, a paramilitary team is standing on your doorstep,
brandishing their weaponry, pointing guns in your face, in your
wife's/husband's face, while your children or grandchildren huddle in
fear in the background.
You
will do what we say, or we will lock you up, or kill you.
How
then, can you possibly stop them?
Hitler
did it, Stalin did it, Chairman Mao did it...and on and on it
goes....
The
objectives of each of these tyrants (and many others throughout the
course of history) were the same: TO STRIP YOU OF YOUR GOD-GIVEN,
UNALIENABLE RIGHTS & LIBERTIES, TO CONTROL EVERY ASPECT OF YOUR
LIFE & DESTINY. And they gained this power because the people, AS
INDIVIDUALS, failed to stand up and stop them.
Totalitarianism,
courtesy of the New World Order.
Don't
be fooled: The promotion and support of even one leftist opens the
door, throws out the welcome mat, for more leftists, and their
godforsaken globalist totalitarianism. And who is to be held
accountable for all this?
Every
single person who is a part of it, every person who encouraged it,
who aided and abetted the mob of leftists (or just one) in any way,
shape or form.
When
I finished my little stump speech, Howard told me, “I never thought
of it that way.”
And
apparently, he's decided to continue NOT to think of it that way.
That is his prerogative, but at least I know that I did what I could
in service to the truth. I can only offer the truth to anyone willing
to listen, but I won't try to force it on anyone.
And
with this, I conclude this report.
I
implore all Liberty-loving Patriots, Defenders of Unalienable Rights,
of the Sovereignty of this Constitutional Republic, to take a closer
look, a hard look, at those claiming to be what they so clearly are
not. Only a few are mentioned here, but they are legion.
You
will find their propaganda on numerous high-traffic commercial
websites. You will hear their deceptive rhetoric booming out on the
airwaves.
But
what of their actions? Whom and what do they actually support?
Whom
do they attack with their libelous/slanderous falsehoods?
They
are deceivers and hypocrites, merchants of false hope, masquerading
as patriots, freedom fighters, opponents of the New World Order.
They
are the enemies of Liberty, while claiming to champion it.
END
Howard Nemaizer & Janet Phelan
Is
there a moral to this story?
I
think there is. For those who understand, no explanation is
necessary. For those who do not, no explanation is possible.
Barbara
Hartwell
Defender
of Liberty and God-given Unalienable Individual Rights
March 31, 2026
RELATED REPORTS
JANET
PHELAN: PROFILE OF A LEFT-WING AGITATOR FOR ONE WORLD TOTALITARIAN
GOVERNMENT
https://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2017/09/janet-phelan-profile-of-left-wing.html
THE
PRICE OF LIBERTY: A Retrospective on Political Persecution in America
(2)
http://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-price-of-liberty-retrospective-on_15.html
Trafficking
with the Devil
https://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2012/10/trafficking-with-devil_6042.html
PART
2: Trafficking with the Devil
https://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2013/07/part-2-trafficking-with-devil.html
AGITATING
FOR LEFT-WING MOB RULE, TOTALITARIANISM, THE U.N. & THE NEW WORLD
ORDER: EXPOSING HYPOCRITES, JANET PHELAN & HOWARD NEMAIZER,
MAKING FALSE CLAIMS OF THEIR DEFENSE OF LIBERTY & HUMAN RIGHTS
https://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2024/05/agitating-for-left-wing-mob-rule.html
THE
JACKASS AWARD
https://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2017/09/the-jackass-award.html
Mob
of Busybodies Conduct Witch Hunt on Facebook
https://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2017/09/mob-of-busybodies-conduct-witch-hunt-on.html
