Barbara Hartwell

My photo
Independent Investigator, Intelligence Analyst, Journalist. Former CIA (NOC, Psychological Operations) Black Ops Survivor. Sovereign Child of God. Minister of the Gospel of Jesus Christ (Ordained 1979, D.Div.) Exposing Government Lies, Crimes, Corruption, Conspiracies and Cover-ups.

Sunday, January 26, 2020

Tracy Krawitt (aka SPACEY TRACY), the Neighbor from Hell: FORMAL COMPLAINT TO POLICE & COMMENTARY

The following is a formal complaint I wrote, for the police, in my own defense, against a woman named Tracy Krawitt, who made a false police report against Barbara Hartwell, accusing me of threatening to “kill” her.

Barbara Hartwell
PO Box 22
Rhinebeck, NY 12572
Tenant (since January 1, 2014) at XXX
Rhinebeck, NY


On December 8, 2019, a tenant who lives across the street from me [Name was unknown at the time of this writing. I later found her name to be Tracy Krawitt.] called the police, making an unwarranted complaint against me. In fact, it was a false police report, as explained herein.

I do not know this woman, and had never spoken to her before. She has a large commercial trailer truck, hauled by a smaller truck, with writing on the side, SPACEY TRACY'S DEEP FRIED PICKLES.

Shortly after 7:00 PM, I was in my house when I heard loud noise and commotion outside, voices shouting, very close to my house, doors slamming, the sound of an engine and scraping of tires. I opened my door to see what the ruckus was, and saw that the truck was backing up, and then moving forward, repeatedly, coming very close to my car, which was parked outside, in the yard in front of the house, parallel to the driveway, in the designated spot.

I was very concerned that the driver might hit my car. The woman was standing inside my front yard (not a part of the driveway), shouting to the driver, as he tried to maneuver the vehicles. As I have witnessed in the past, the driver is extremely inept, and has caused damage on the property before, knocking down pole reflectors which are placed at the edges of the common circular driveway around which the cottages are situated.

I opened my door and came out on the porch and shouted over the noise, warning them not to hit my car. I was answered by the man driving the truck, who yelled out the window, “F- you!” After this verbal assault by the man (name unknown), I told the woman to “get the hell out of my yard”, that she had no business creating such a disturbance.

She answered, rudely and arrogantly dismissing my concerns, “ You need to chill out.” I repeated my directive for her to “get the hell out of my yard”, and she then moved onto the edge of the driveway. The man continued to curse at me, from the truck, more F- you! and other curses I could not make out. In outrage and disgust, I called them “assholes”, in response to this verbal assault. I then said I would report this outrageous behavior to the police.

The woman then said that she would call the landlord (who owns all rental properties but does not live on the property), and said, “I'll give you the numbers for the state and local police”. I told her I did not need any such numbers from her.

I then went back into the house. I was outraged and extremely distressed by their abusive and harassing behavior, but I decided that I would call the police the next day (Monday, December 9) to report the incident because I did not see the need to call, when there was no immediate emergency. The truck had finally been maneuvered to park in front of the cottage occupied by the woman, Tracy Krawitt.

I had planned to make a formal complaint about this incident, and so that the police would be apprised that these disturbances were a regular occurrence, which disrupted the peace and quiet on the property, of which other neighbors had also complained; but to my knowledge, they never called the police.

In the past, both of these individuals (Tracy Krawitt and the driver) have created such disturbances numerous times, making noise, yelling, blocking the common driveway between the cottages, loudly cursing at my other neighbors (F-you!, etc.) and knocking down reflectors placed at the edge of the driveway with the truck, which my neighbors had to keep replacing each time they were destroyed by the negligent actions of these individuals.

They have also left deep gouges from their tires in the shared side yard between my house and my neighbors', tearing up the grass and flowers, causing us to place lawn chairs at the edge of the driveway, to stop such intrusions into the yard. Putting up a physical barrier was the only way to stop them, as they had repeatedly disregarded the complaints from my neighbors. The reflectors, as well, were originally put in place for the same purpose, to stop them from intruding onto the grass adjacent to the circular driveway.

These individuals have been extremely rude, aggressive and disrespectful, with no concern whatsoever for the rights of other tenants on the property. Which is why I had good reason to be concerned that they might hit my car.

A few minutes after the incident, three (3) police officers came to my door, arriving in two separate cars. This woman, Krawitt, had called them, though she and her associate (the driver of the truck) were the only aggressors/offenders. They were creating a disturbance; the man was verbally abusive and I had every good reason to fear that my car might be hit.

When the police came, I was shocked to hear that this woman had given them totally false information about the incident, which amounts to making a false police report. I explained what had happened, such as I am documenting here, in greater detail.

One officer actually told me that this woman had claimed that I had made a threat to “kill” her. This is an outrageous lie! This woman, Tracy Krawitt, is a liar and a false witness. I said no such thing, nor would I, nor have I ever made such a threat to anyone. As stated above, my only responses to this outrageous behavior, strictly in my own defense, were, “Do not hit my car.”; “Get the hell out of my yard.”, and to call them “assholes”, after I was verbally assaulted by the man. There were no threats whatsoever made by me.

The officer told me that it would all be documented, though he declined to tell me the exact nature of the complaint made by this woman, Tracy Krawitt. However, due to the fact that this woman has lied to the police, bearing false witness against me, I find it necessary to document the incident myself, as a formal complaint, for the record. Making a false report to the police is a serious offense, and certainly cause for action on the part of the injured party.

Moreover, the egregious nature of the false report is of great concern to me, as my good name has been slandered and this false accusation is now on record, as documented by the police.

As a tenant, I have the right to quiet enjoyment of the rental property for which I am paying. This woman, Tracy Krawitt, has created, in general, a hostile environment, with the regular disturbances and incursions.

I was told by the police that it was difficult to move such a vehicle, as if I should take that into consideration. However, that is not my concern, and I am not required to make accommodations for their problems, especially when they are creating noise, stress and disrespecting my rights in the process. If they are unable or unwilling to run their commercial business without creating disturbances for others (on a regular basis), they should move their business to another location, for which the current location is certainly unsuited, being a strictly residential area, not for use by commercial purposes.

The fact is that Ms. Krawitt has now made a false police report, accusing me of issuing a threat to her life, when no such event occurred. It appears that she made this false report as a preemptive, malicious attempt to justify her complaint against me, which was totally unwarranted.

These actions constitute a grievous injustice, which I do not intend to tolerate. I consider the man's verbal assaults as menacing, and I now have reason to be concerned that she might call the police again, bearing false witness, at her whim, since she has apparently got away with it in this instance.

Please be advised that my only actions were in attempts to defend my property and my rights as a tenant. Her actions and her false report to the police place Ms. Krawitt entirely in the wrong. Also please be advised that I intend to pursue every lawful means in order to hold her accountable and to clear my name from these injurious false accusations.

This incident has caused extreme distress for me, including having three (3) police officers interrogating me, especially in light of the fact that I have been falsely accused of an offense I did not commit.

I don't blame the police, as I understand that they are required to respond to all complaints. The only blame should be attributed to the false accuser, Tracy Krawitt, who lied to the police and made the false report.

I have no intention of having any further dealings with this woman, unless she instigates further offenses against me, in which case I will immediately contact the police.

Please consider this my formal complaint and keep this document for the record, so that my testimony as to the facts is known.

Thank you for your consideration.

Barbara Hartwell


My neighbors, mentioned here, witnessed some of the incident from inside their house next door, though they did not hear anything, except the woman, Ms. Krawitt, shouting. They are willing to corroborate some of my testimony about the negligent actions and damages, and the disrespectful and destructive behavior of these individuals. Having known me for the past 6 years, they also know me to be a quiet neighbor who has always been respectful of others on the property.

They also later noted and were witness to the tire tracks from the truck, only inches from my car, which the police also saw.

If you check your records, you will see that the police have never been called, by anyone making a complaint against me, during the time I have resided here, since January, 2014. I have never caused any disturbances on the property, though I have called to report loud altercations by other tenants, who were eventually evicted by the landlord, for cause.


In my formal complaint to the police, I restricted myself to stating the facts. I later decided to make this a public report, where I am under no such restrictions.

This woman, Tracy Krawitt, deserves to be publicly exposed and rebuked for her utterly reprehensible actions, her flagrant lack of respect for the rights of others, and her dishonest character.

Tracy Krawitt has brought nothing but trouble and grief to her neighbors who are tenants on this property.

Ms. Krawitt's other neighbors (including me) have worked to create gardens in our yards, and to maintain the property as a peaceful, pleasant place to live.

That has now all changed, with the invasion of this trashy, loud-mouthed woman and her grotesque pickle truck.

The truck from which she peddles her wares is a hideous-looking monstrosity, the worst of eyesores, which no one can escape seeing from the minute the sun rises. It dominates the landscape, a jarring bright fire-engine red, emblazoned with garish images of dancing green pickles – imagine having your eyes assaulted, day after day, with THAT.

The main driveway is regularly blocked by other vehicles, a daily gridlock of cars and trucks, belonging to her or her associates, parked in front of her residence, along with an assortment of yard trash.

The presence of this eyesore (along with its owner) has destroyed the natural setting of the property, making it look like a trashy shantytown, a habitat for transients and carnival workers.

I can only describe Tracy Krawitt aka SPACEY TRACY as the Neighbor from Hell. I pray that she goes back to where she came from, along with her low class associates, her trash, and her damnable hell-fired pickles, to leave the rest of us in peace.

Barbara Hartwell
January 26, 2020

Tracy Krawitt, Irresponsible Owner of Howling Dog, Causes Constant Noise Disturbance on Rhinebeck Property


Friday, January 24, 2020



Erika Meyer Produces Video of Babbling Idiocy & Wild Speculation

On October 29, 2019 a woman named Erika Meyer produced two videos:
"Disinformation theatre: Katherine Horton, Ramola D, Frederic Larouche, Melanie Vritschan (part 1)"

"Disinformation theatre: Katherine Horton, Ramola D, Frederic Larouche, Melanie Vritschan (part 2)"

"Looking more closely into the disinformation theatre, and into the background of Ramola Dharmaraj."


Erika Meyer: Just one among the idiot parade of Internet trolls –aggressive, ill-informed, moronic characters who apparently have nothing better to do with their time than engage in wild speculation, while promoting baseless, slanderous gossip about others.

The name of Barbara Hartwell was included in the speculative, defamatory ramblings of this woman. These characters are a dime a dozen, and ooze out of the woodwork to target legitimate people, usually journalists, activists, patriots, genuine government whistleblowers.

I've seen it time and time again. Their Targets (including me), after trying to ignore them (in the hope they may spontaneously self-destruct, or just go away), when exposing these idiots, will often make a comment, such as: I never heard of this whackjob. Yet he/she is grossly exploiting my name; making false accusations; fabricating weird/absurd stories about me; pretending that they “know” things, and/or falsely claiming there is some personal “connection” or “link” where absolutely none exists.

From my observations (and unfortunate experience) of being targeted by hordes of these creepy characters, they are ignorant, unprincipled persons seeking public attention – the more, the better, any way they can get it.

Since these wannabes have no credentials, no professional background of any kind, which could possibly qualify them to present any information of value (educational or otherwise), they resort to malicious aggression against others whom they envy (not in a good way), dropping names and crashing gates, foolishly thinking they can force their way into the legitimate business of others, and thus gain public acclaim they have not earned and do not deserve – except, of course, to be exposed as pretentious, babbling fools.

In a word, they are troublemakers. And I, for one, firmly believe they should be exposed, to set the public record straight, to refute their outrageous falsehoods, and as a warning to others to steer clear of them.

On what, exactly, did Erika Meyer base her idiotic babbling?

On a lone exhibit: a lurid “attack” chart produced by a notorious charlatan, Katherine Horton, the Tin Foil Princess of Eastern Europe; from a website called STOP 007, on which Horton has maliciously and profusely defamed Ramola D, Barbara Hartwell, Melanie Vritschan, Thomas McFarlan, with lurid and incendiary false accusations.

I must say it was a form of torture to listen to the ignorant ramblings of this woman, Meyer. Her whiny, nasal voice grates on the nerves, through 20 minutes of wild speculation, as she makes false connections and “links” where none exist; and as she expresses her delusions that SHE, Erika Meyer, is at the center of some grand conspiracy, spawned by those she claims are running a “disinformation theatre”.

As tiresome as it is, I took some notes, and will use this material to make an example of a typical participant in the Idiot Hit Parade, making videos which display nothing but their unmitigated stupidity.

Here are some statements (not exact quotes) from Erika Meyer, followed by my comments. Anyone who is interested in more idiotic details may listen to the video.


EM: "I spent yesterday looking for more information on Ramola. I believe all the people on this page are disinfo people."

So, she is apparently doing “opposition research”, otherwise known as digging for dirt on a person she dislikes, in the hope of finding something she can use against her. As you read on, note that in her search for information on Ramola, she found no damning info, no titillating scandals, no criminal record, nothing at all –but typically for her ilk, that didn't stop her from breaking out the pole vault, flying through the ether and landing on her sorry butt, amid a trash heap of false conclusions.

EM: "I mean, you know....most people who are called whistleblowers here are not, know, I can see a pattern and sniff these people out pretty quickly. Most people who call themselves TIs are hiding something."

On the chart to which she refers, I see not one person referred to as a “whistleblower”. And who does she think decides, who is, or who is not, a whistleblower? Is Erika Meyer the judge of that? Or, Katherine Horton, the architect of the chart? Neither of whom would qualify as whistleblowers, under even the most lax of standards.

Aside from knowing and stating the definitive qualifications of a whistleblower (based on facts and evidence), it would only be a matter of subjective perception and speculation, a “skill set” with which Erika Myer appears to have developed considerable expertise.

As for people who call themselves “TIs” hiding something? Speaking strictly for myself, as always, I do NOT call myself a TI, and have no commonalities with those who do, nor am involved with any of their groups. So, had she the slightest discernment, she would count me out.

What's more, anything I choose to “hide” from the prying eyes of the general public is my prerogative, my right. It's called PRIVACY, ever heard of it? No, indeed. For a snoop, gate-crasher and gossip like Erika Meyer, personal boundaries don't even exist.

NOTE: If you're looking for a bloodhound to “sniff out” a Target, don't call Erika Meyer.

Next, more speculation on Ramola:

EM: "Ramola is of Indian descent... based on speech patterns I believe she was born in India. A lot of the mind control doctors are linked to India. All mind control is linked to frequency based stuff."

Ramola was born in India. That is a fact on the public record, which anyone can easily find, and which Ramola herself has stated publicly. So what? But her “speech patterns” do not necessarily reflect any particular country of origin, nor could be studied for even a clue as to her actual birth place. Erika Meyer doesn't know what the hell she is talking about.

And now Meyer brings in “mind control doctors”. Meyer claims many are “linked” to India. Does she offer any statistics, any sources? No. And what does any of this have to do with Ramola? Nothing whatsoever. Just more pure speculation, in a shoddy attempt to “link” Ramola to some sinister mind control operations.

And no, “all” mind control is not “linked to frequency-based stuff”. There are many methodologies used, which I won't bother to describe. I will only say that it is clear that Erika Meyer is sorely lacking in knowledge and understanding on this subject.

EM: "Katherine Horton's video is a rehashing of this disinfo theatre. Could it be KH is advocating for frequency-based attacks?

I don't know what's the deal with Ramola, she is the first one that came to me in a dream. I got hints about she wasn't exactly what she seemed to be."

Meyer does not clarify her meaning, regarding Katherine Horton; it all sounds like gibberish.

And no, she most certainly does NOT know anything about Ramola. She claims that Ramola “came to her in a dream”. As usual, there is no description given, only more vague speculation about “hints” from a dream, in attempts to discredit Ramola and paint her as a suspicious character.

Now, she moves on to her next Target, Melanie Vritschan:

EM: "Melanie is disinfo. I question if she was really pregnant, and had a child. I'm not saying she was kidnapped by the hospital, not saying she wasn't. I'm very skeptical."

Again, nothing but pure speculation. But the toxic seed is planted: Melanie might well be a liar, and all part of the so-called “disinformation theatre”. And again, no evidence, just her subjective speculation. But nonetheless, these false allegations could be very damaging to Melanie's reputation.

EM: "Katherine Horton is accusing Ramola of inducing people to's all very confusing to me."

Well, she finally admits being confused. Confusion is always what results from engaging in wild speculation, with no concern for establishing facts. But does that bother her? Clearly not, as she continues to spew her uninformed idiocy.

EM: "Katherine Horton is clearly very smart and a good public speaker."


I have seen no evidence of KH being “very smart”, based on her prolific public videos. What I have seen is an accomplished liar, a charlatan promoting false (and often contradictory) information, which is then repeated and parroted by Horton's entourage of sycophants and stooges.

Meyer's idea of a “good public speaker” is a theatrical display by a hysterical woman hunkering down in a tin-foil bunker, dropping F-bombs and issuing calls to action for murder of public officials and intelligence personnel? Or, droning on about “cartel signaling”, or collecting affidavits for fantasy court cases, which have never resulted in any justice for anyone foolish enough to join her scams (or pay hefty fees for her “counseling services”).

Then, Erika Meyer engages in more wild speculation about Horton's ethnicity, and that, maybe, Katherine Horton is not her real name. Again, no evidence is presented... maybe this, maybe that...maybe, maybe maybe. What's her point? As usual, she doesn't say.

Now, she goes back to her speculation on Ramola.

EM: "I'm going to show what I found out online about Ramola."

She shows a screen shot of one of those commercial sites used by amateur sleuths, in the hope of digging up dirt on their enemies; sites that are notorious for providing misleading or outright false information. (Who cares? As long as they are raking in the money!)

Then, she points back to Horton's “attack chart”, and draws attention to the photo of “Barbara Hartwell (CIA)”.

EM: "Just because it says Barbara Hartwell CIA doesn't mean her name is really Barbara Hartwell. Does it mean she's really linked to the CIA? No it just means somebody said these things."

Well, what a brilliant piece of detective work! Duh.

But for the record, Barbara Hartwell is my real name. And no, despite the decades-long promotion of liars like Horton, that I am CIA, I have been out of CIA for the past 26 years.

Meyer moves back to the document on Ramola, continuing her speculation.

EM: "Tanis, I never heard of anybody having this last name. Is there a link to Egypt?"

Next, a non-sequitur to the film Rosemary's Baby:

EM: "There may be a link to Rosemary's Baby. It came out the year I was born. She's given tanis root to wear around her neck, a bad smelling herb, and now that I think about it there's indications of induced suicides in the movie."

Tanis, in fact, is simply a surname, with no sinister connotations, and not at all uncommon. In her vast ignorance, Meyer “links” it to TANNIS root (NOT “tanis”), and then babbles on that it is “linked” to suicide...and a film produced in 1968...the year she was born. So what? Many people were born in 1968. Does that make them all “linked” to Rosemary's Baby?

Are we watching The Twilight Zone? What's next...that the film was based on Ramola's life as a mind control doctor, a Svengali whose victims commit suicide? By Meyer's “logic”, anything is possible. But none of it factual, none of it true.

Next, she shows Ramola's photo, the one she uses on her website, and proceeds with her profound “analysis”.

EM: "Earring in left ear I believe... is coded as meaning a restriction around the ear, and might also have to do with surveillance. The left side is linked to me and Curtis (?) She is also pictured with the right eye obscured so its a good thing to remember the deception. A square shaped necklace, square is 4, probably a link to the emperor and books behind her, she's a writer."

All these imaginary “codes” and links”. What a lot of stupid gibberish! Where she gets these silly ideas is anyone's guess, but not worth the time to examine. According to Erika Meyer, wearing an earring is a “code” for surveillance. That means, I guess, that anyone who wears earrings is to be suspected of some sinister plot? And she “links” the right eye to “deception”? And the square shaped necklace is a “link” to “the emperor”. What emperor?

This goes far beyond speculation into the realm of sheer nonsensical idiocy.

But it continues...

Meyer now states that Ramola is “linked” to Arlington, Virginia.

EM: "Arlington is linked with military, and intelligence like the CIA kind of stuff. I think Arlington is pretty close to... the name just blew out of my mind, what's the name, McLean, is that the name? Very near where CIA headquarters is."

So now, she informs her audience that because the location of Arlington appears on some site, along with Ramola's name, it MUST BE some “link” to the military, to intelligence and to... (cue the drum roll)...the nefarious world of CIA!

CIA headquarters is in Langley. But so what? Now, according to the flawless “logic” of Erika Meyer, anyone who ever lived anywhere in the general area of Virginia, has “links” to CIA?

And the babbling idiocy rolls on...

EM: "I think it also links her to Michelle. What I'm getting to is the idea that Ramola, like Katherine Horton, actually has a longstanding history with me personally and with what I call the trafficking system around me.

She is in fact linked with me is a significant way, people who are linked with me in a significant way often are referred to in a fictionalized way."

Now, it gets really bizarre. Erika Meyer is claiming that Ramola is “linked” to her, by a “longstanding history”. And that there is a “trafficking system” around her.

Does she present any explanation of this history, or this trafficking system? No, of course not. It is sheer delusional fantasy. And to claim that this utter nonsense is a “fact” only shows how out of touch with reality she must be.

Who are the fictional characters? And who is Michelle? And why is she exploiting Ramola's name in her attempt to weave a tall tale, in which SHE, Erika Myer, appears to play a starring role?

Finally, it ends with this:

"The name Dharmaraj, she like Katherine Horton has a key role in a longer standing relationship. It's possible that Ramola is linked to Michelle so its link after link after link."

Erika Meyer seems to be obsessed with “links”. Links that lead nowhere and exist only in her mind, by virtue of her obvious psychopathology, mixed with ignorance and plain old stupidity.

If a link does not exist, no problem, she will fabricate one. And no doubt, she will keep on babbling.





By their fruits shall you know them.

Barbara Hartwell
January 24, 2020

PS: Erika Meyer, next time you make one of your idiotic videos, LEAVE MY NAME OUT, or take the consequences.

Friday, January 10, 2020


On December 25, 2019 a link was posted on Twitter by Karen Stewart to this article:

Reply to Ramola!244&ithint=file%2Cdocx&authkey=!AI2C_iKGRLJIttI

Included in the article was this false accusation against Barbara Hartwell:

"Thoughtful responses” - like sending me a screen shot (of my tweets) attributed to Barbara Hartwell, letting me know “they are watching me” and another screen shot of a tweet where I laud peace-making where possible and Ramola herself denigrates it as “a tweet from God” showing her contempt for peacemakers and perhaps the Judeo-Christian God?"

I refuted this falsehood, among others, in this report:


Subsequently, more false accusations were issued, which I proceeded to refute in a second report:


It is important to state that although others were also falsely accused, aside from Ramola, against whom the defamation was primarily directed, not one of them was named, but ONLY Barbara Hartwell. It is also important to state (once again) that I am NOT personally acquainted with these unnamed persons with whom I am accused of being in collusion, nor have had any contact with them.

Then, there is the fact that I am not involved, nor ever have been, in what many (including Karen Stewart) call the “TI Community”. I am not a member of any of their groups. I do not participate in any of their activities. I am not in contact with any of these persons, nor do I endorse, promote or support their various agendas, which they claim are for advocacy for “Targeted Individuals”.

As I have stated many times, in my considered professional opinion, these groups are controlled opposition, containment operations and protection rackets, infested with government operatives and their minions and stooges.

I have exposed quite a number of these individuals, by name, especially those who claim to be “leaders”, for exactly who and what they are, as a warning to others; on principle; and to refute the many false claims, as libel and slander, which they have fabricated and/or parroted against Barbara Hartwell and others among my friends and colleagues, including –but certainly not limited to –Ramola D.

In brief summary, some of the false accusations made by Karen Stewart against Barbara Hartwell were:

That I had sent an e-mail to Ramola and (unnamed) others, which contained an entry from Karen Stewart on Twitter, for the purpose of letting her know she was being “watched”.


That I and others were part of a “mob”, and “pack of self-centered immature dimwits”.


That “Ramola outs Barbara / out of the blue.”


On January 6, 2020, yet another false accusation was launched by Karen Stewart against Barbara Hartwell and Ramola D, which I must, on principle, and in my own defense, refute and counter with facts.

Copied from Twitter:

"#PATHETIC NOTE: When you have to “donate” money to a third person to libel someone on their nothing site, with whom you blew your friendship, to pretend it is independent criticism, that is definitely the definition of pathetic. Lol!!! TI Chronicles Soap Opera. Thank you “C”."

Note that no names are used in this entry. This, after my name was previously the ONLY one, in addition to Ramola.

But the meaning is clear to anyone who has been following this recent smear operation against Ramola D and Barbara Hartwell.

Ramola posted this on Twitter, in reference to this latest:

"Sadly, #KarenStewart's smear-operation-without-cause continues. Appalled to see this tweet sent to me today where she seems to level #PureLibel agnst. CIA Whistleblower Barbara Hartwell's independent analyses, rebuttals on her highly valuable info/analysis/record-keeping site."

This is undoubtedly the worst, and most outrageous public accusation yet to be made by Karen Stewart (at least that I have seen.) I am now accused of taking a “bribe” to “libel” her. Ramola is accused of giving me a “donation”, of “buying” my services, as if I were nothing but some mercenary, some whore, some hired gun.

WRONG. DEAD WRONG and not to be tolerated. I am NOBODY's hired gun. I speak strictly for myself. I say what I mean and mean what I say.

And my website, according to Karen Stewart, is a “nothing site”.

My website (in various forms) has been online since 2000, and my work previously published on the Internet since 1995.

Because of the factual information, backed by evidence, exposing government corruption, crimes, conspiracies and coverups; because of NAMING NAMES of criminals, liars, traitors, reprobates and scumbags, all published on this “nothing” site, I have suffered some of the most hellish persecution ever known to be perpetrated against any government whistleblower.

I have been threatened with lawsuits by CIA agents, by FBI (including JTTF), by former FBI agents, by former senators, and by those calling themselves “federal whistleblowers”.

I have been the Target of a long-running, massive defamation campaign, for more than two decades. This, on high-traffic, commercial sites specializing in government disinformation.

I have had several attempts on my life, which include arranged car crashes, leaving me seriously injured and permanently disabled.

I have received credible death threats, which forced me to leave my home and seek temporary sanctuary.

I have been driven out of any home I had, repeatedly, and forced to spend a total of 2 years and 8 months in motels, with my possessions in storage. No landlord would rent to me, because of the false information/black propaganda disseminated against me, posted on the Internet by my enemies in CIA, FBI et al.

I have been driven to total financial destitution, so that I had no reliable source of support, and only barely survived on charity from Christian churches and donations from supporters of my work, posted on my “nothing site”.

I have lost nearly everything I owned, including most of my possessions and my house in Maine (the only real home I ever had, in which I invested everything).

I have had to go hungry, when I could not afford to buy food, and was forced to sell many of my possessions, and go to the Salvation Army and other food banks for the poor, rather than starve.

I have been driven to homelessness, where I was literally cast into the street, when there was not a soul who cared enough to help me.

I have been poisoned, drugged and assaulted with directed-energy weaponry.

I have been stalked by psychos, on foot, in vehicles and by cyberstalkers, harassing me by e-mail, as well as telephone harassment.

I have been harassed by helicopters and military jets, flying directly over some of the homes where I lived, violating FAA regs, for purpose of attempted intimidation.

SWAT teams have been deployed against people who tried to help me, who were threatened to “stay away from Barbara Hartwell”...or else.

Several of my ex-military bodyguards have had their lives threatened, and received “friendly warnings”, which unfortunately for me, caused them to abandon me, rather than stand up for the truth, which was exposed by me and published on my “nothing site”.

So, Karen Stewart may think I have a “nothing” site. But those persecuting me for the content of that site, and threatening me to REMOVE that site, in attempts to silence me and stop me from exposing them, have a very different view.

And NEVER ONCE have I allowed them to intimidate me, no matter what they threatened. My “nothing” website is still online, and will be until God sends the chariot to take me home.

And NEVER ONCE have I taken a bribe, for any reason, though the bad guys have certainly attempted to co-opt me for such purposes. As I have proved by my actions, over many years, I will never compromise with evil. I would rather die on my feet, standing for the truth, and in pursuit of JUSTICE, than live on my knees, in submission to tyrants.

And as God is my witness, that will never change, no matter what.

As for Ramola, she is one of very few people I have ever known who actually offered me the support I need (including material support), with no questions asked, no strings attached, no quid pro quo. She personifies the true meaning of friendship. So, to accuse her of bribing anyone to libel others is absolutely sickening and a gross injustice.

So, if Karen Stewart really thinks she can discredit me (for whatever agenda) by such truly “pathetic” means as grossly insulting my honor, making false accusations and fabricating absurd stories, peppered with “LOL”, as if it were some kind of joke, it might behoove her to think again.

In Outrage & Disgust,
Barbara Hartwell
January 10, 2020

Saturday, January 4, 2020


Again, I must set the record straight on additional public comments from Karen Stewart (KS), posted on Twitter in reference to my report of December 27, 2019.

KS posted a screenshot of my report, marked up with red pen, along with the e-mail which she falsely claimed was “attributed to Barbara Hartwell”, in her article, Reply to Ramola.

As I have already stated, the e-mail (containing the screenshot of KS's entry on Twitter) did NOT originate with me, and therefore CANNOT, in point of fact, be “attributed” to me.

As I later learned, it was sent by Ramola, TO me, and I did not even receive it the first time it was sent.

Ramola has corroborated this FACT here:

"As a consequence of hacking, MY pvt emails to friends, incl. MY screenshots of KS's appalling tweets, were deliberately sent to #KarenStewart inst. of who I'd addressed my email to".

This may come as a news flash to some, but I have no control whatsoever over hackers, who regularly intercept both outgoing and incoming e-mail, as they have done for many years. Apparently it was sent to KS by these hackers, in an attempt to sow discord and stir up trouble – at my expense, so that I would be falsely accused of an action I did not take and blamed for something over which I had no control.

This is SOP for counterintelligence operations, a fact of which KS evidently has limited knowledge.

Still, the blame attributed to me involved a personal decision by KS, in drawing a false conclusion, making an unwarranted assumption, and then making it public, thus damaging my reputation on a false claim.

In any case, the statement by KS, included in the e-mail, was made PUBLICLY on Twitter, and was thus available for all and sundry to see. No accusation of  “snitch” or “watcher” or other such epithets could possibly carry any weight, at least with anyone who understands how such operations work.

In the screenshot of the e-mail posted on Twitter by KS, she marked it with red, adding the name HARTWELL, in caps.

So now, she fabricates her own “evidence”, in an attempt to validate a false accusation? Again, the name Barbara Hartwell was not in the e-mail, nor was the e-mail sent TO anyone by me.

Then, she cooks up another false accusation:

"Love that Ramola outs Barbara / out of the blue. And anyone not doing Ramola’s bidding suddenly becomes “a plant” too who slanders her slander."

There was never any “outing” of Barbara Hartwell, by Ramola, or anyone else. This statement is as absurd as the original accusation of “snitch”. And, for the record, I have accused no one of being a “plant”, related to this situation. Nor could I ever be accused, by any reasonable person interested in facts, of “doing Ramola's bidding”.

The statement that KS “loves” this so-called “outing” of Barbara Hartwell speaks volumes, and shows that there is most certainly a negative bias, with no relevance to facts.

And it gets even more absurd, with this statement from KS:

"Note, Ramola is cyberstalking me by email as well, showing Barbara and mob are “watching me” on Twitter by emailing Screen shots. “Vee vill make you comply!” Keep it up, dimwits."

I have no reason to believe this accusation, that Ramola is “cyberstalking” Karen Stewart. I have seen no evidence of any such actions. I have only seen Ramola responding publicly to defamatory statements, in her own defense.

And now, I am also accused of being part of a “mob”. How this could possibly be concluded from any of my actions could only be a testament to the illogical, subjective perceptions of a person whose beliefs are determined not by the objective observations and assessment of FACTS, but rather by a propensity to ignore facts, and to distort facts, for some agenda, which I will not presume to name.

Furthermore, I have never in my life had any intent of, nor taken any action, which would be for the purpose of coercion against anyone, in a Nazi-esque manner, to “comply” with anything. Nothing could be further from the truth. This is the height of absurdity, as is labeling me a “dimwit”.

Lastly, this:

"Have done THREE interviews telling non-target audiences about the Targeted Individual plight in December 2019 alone. Yet a pack of self-centered immature dimwits wants to attack & attempt to discredit the ONLY NSA Whistleblower SPEAKING OUT AT ALL much less CONSISTENTLY for TI’s."

It is not my concern how many interviews Karen Stewart has done, or in what time frame. As stated many times in my reports, I am NOT INVOLVED in the so-called “TI Community”, nor have commonalities with those reporting as such. As also stated, for the record, I consider these “TI” groups to be involved in containment operations/protection rackets, which do not operate for the benefit of any individual who is actually seeking to find the truth, or pursue justice against the perpetrators targeting them for various crimes.

None of this has anything to do with me. For the record, I have never once “attacked” Karen Stewart, nor am I involved with any so-called “pack of self-centered immature dimwits”, nor could any of my words or actions ever be reasonably construed as such.

And why is it that my name (along with Ramola's) is the ONLY one ever mentioned, among this so-called “mob” or “pack”, which could only mean a group?

More to the point, I DO NOT KNOW the persons accused of being part of this "mob", with whom I am accused of being complicit in “attacking” or “discrediting” Karen Stewart.

I don't join groups and have never been a team player. I am extremely selective in my associations with others, personally and professionally. So, in fact, I am being portrayed as if I were the the polar opposite, labeled with all the odious characteristics I despise, and which I stand against – in individuals, or political entities. Truly beyond absurd.

I remain, as I always have been, an independent investigator, intelligence analyst and journalist, a CIA whistleblower. My reports are FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. The readers may make of my reports what they will.

These attempts to discredit me, by accusing me of being a “snitch”; of being part of a “mob”; of being a “self-serving dimwit”, are completely baseless and, as always, only reflect on the accuser.

Again, I repeat:

By their fruits shall you know them.

Barbara Hartwell
January 4, 2020