Barbara Hartwell

My photo
Independent Investigator, Intelligence Analyst, Journalist. Former CIA (NOC, Psychological Operations) Black Ops Survivor. Sovereign Child of God. Minister of the Gospel of Jesus Christ (Ordained 1979, D.Div.) Exposing Government Lies, Crimes, Corruption, Conspiracies and Cover-ups.

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

A Matter of Conscience

NOTE, February, 2007: Since this was written, Tom Flocco has proven (at least to me) that he has no credibility whatsoever. He continues to write and promote "news" stories which have no basis in fact. He continues to use anonymous sources (using pseudonyms) who cannot establish that their testimony has any basis in fact. 

He continues to promote documents (as in the case of the JFK Jr. "investigation") which are known to be bogus --and this, after he was warned that he was being fed false information by some of his sources, including Stew Webb and Tom Heneghan, who KNOWINGLY fed him false info to serve their own agenda.

From the Revolutionary Coalition Forum

September, 2005

A Matter of Conscience
As a matter of conscience I must address some issues on which I have seen commentaries posted here on the Revolutionary Coalition forum. I don't expect anyone to take my viewpoint as gospel, nor to believe anything I say. Why should they? My policy has always been: The readers may make of my reports what they will. Same holds true with this report.

I also have no interest in further discussion of these issues, nor in engaging in arguments or debates, so please do not e-mail me with comments. Those who have something to say will no doubt write their own public reports. For those who wish to repeat the government-sponsored lies that I am a "disinfo agent", be my guest. I'm used to it by now and have developed quite a thick skin over the years. I've openly admitted being CIA in the past (25 years, NOC, Psychological Operations) but not for the past 11 years, since 1994. Take it or leave it, your choice.

Before going further, I should also say I am aware of the possibility that certain people (some of whom are my friends) will be unhappy with this report. Possibly very unhappy. So be it. I've never let that get in the way of expressing my viewpoints or telling the truth as I know it, upon information and belief, and I'm not about to start now.

Thing is, I'm very tired of seeing these "anonymous sources", these cloak-and-dagger types who refuse to come forward with their real names and just stand up for their claims. And while they're at it, furnish the evidence and let it be scrutinized by qualified investigators.

They always claim they are risking their lives to talk to journalists. Well, I have news for them: I've risked my life over and over to expose some of what I know. I use my real name and always have. So have other whistleblowers and activists, like ex-FBI agent Geral Sosbee, Rick Stanley, John Perna, Carl Worden, Liz Michael and others. You may disagree with any of us, or all of us, but at least you know our names and where we stand.

And I'm tired of taking the heat for some of these "anonymous insiders", using pseudonyms, while they hide in the shadows and don't do a damn thing to watch my back. Kind of self centered, wouldn't you say?

Although under normal circumstances, I'd refer the readers to my website for certain articles and reports which relate to the issues here, my site has been off-line for over a year but the new one should be up soon. Any reports I refer to (or persons) will be in the archives.

[My comments are in brackets, preceded by my initials, BH. Several writers are represented here, including Tom Flocco, Don Stacey and "Paul from Pokerface."  In certain parts I have chosen the excerpts which are relevant to the issues I wish to address. None of the original text has been changed.]

NOTE FROM DON STACEY, as preface to Tom Flocco's article, Who Killed John-John? (also posted under Purge the Evil from Among Us.)

Don Stacey wrote:

"This is a detailed account of another assassination of a person who might have challenged the power structure in this country. Please read it carefully. Don't skim it. Reflect upon what is said in this report. Open the links. THINK ABOUT IT!

Are we coming to a cross-road in our country's history? Will we seize the moment? Will good overcome evil at last?

If you agree that this is a stunningly important message, please send it on to as many people as possible. You can bet on the fact that the main stream media will not provide this information to the public.

Do your part. Spread the word.

Don Stacey"

[BH: Firstly, Mr. Don Stacey is CIA. Naturally, he denies it and has accused me of "libeling" him in a public note to Tim White re John DeCamp and Ted Gunderson and their threats of lawsuits. One of his fellow operatives, however, admitted it to an acquaintance of mine, after he was confronted with my testimony. The response was something like this: Well, yes we are CIA. But we are the "good CIA" and Barbara Hartwell is the "bad CIA".

Stacey's "cover" is as a "semi-retired investment banker with no connection to government". This quote comes directly from an e-mail he sent to me in 1998 in attempts to draw me into his little operation. Stacey is a crony of ex-FBI agent Ted Gunderson and frequently disseminates sensationalist anti-government propaganda (just look as his rhetoric, above!) which is not backed by any reliable sources and cannot be independently corroborated.

Stacey's firm, Stonebridge Associates, is a CIA proprietary. For more information about Don Stacey, please see my report, Exposed: CIA MK Ultra Containment Op, which you may find on ex-FBI agent Geral Sosbee's website:  

Go to the Barbara Hartwell banner on the front page and click on: Sample the Hartwell Genius. (Thanks for the compliment, Geral, whether I deserve or not.) When I see anything posted by Don Stacey, I have to figure the content is questionable. By flooding the market with a combination of disinfo and accurate factual information, Stacey covers all the bases, or so he thinks. If you're looking for government disinfo agents, here's one who has been operating for years.]


To: Wolfram
From: Tom Flocco

Re: Grand jury investigations of White House crime familes

1. Good to hear from you. Yes, I have been offline for 10 days. As a matter of fact, I will pass this reply to you on to a few others to keep everyone up to date, since I have been out of circulation for a fair length of time. My computer crashed just minutes after I started to send email regarding the JFK Jr. story; and I had to get the hard drive repaired, etc.....quite a mess.....phones tapped, phones turned off for 36 hours on four separate occasions in last three weeks....the Department of Defense continuously port-scanning and trying to break into my computer 24/7....still have not sent out any emails on new stories for the last two weeks. The violations of personal rights are a lesson for all to observe--and for what is coming IF criminal administrations are not prosecuted.

2. The JFK Jr. story received at least 20 million hits and counting at my site, so people somehow found and read it around the world. Jeff Rense and David Icke played a major roll in promoting that story around the web since my computer had problems. Those two are great patriots and took on some personal risk like some of us. I was told the CIA in Langley, VA is VERY appreciative of their help in promoting the JFK Jr story. I am still shocked by Delbert's interviews for that piece and the gravity of it all. It caused a second grand jury to investigate the evidence. Most don't know the story was finished long before it was released to the public. I had to wait about two weeks to get the approval of some nine witness families who are in physical jeopardy for what they saw and heard regarding the murder plot involving the Bushes and Clintons. But the witnesses know probes are ongoing in multiple states; so "Delbert" gave the final approval as the key source for the story and we went with it. U.S. Intelligence told me Bushes 41, 43, Bill 42, and Sen. Clinton met together in the White House and discussed the story on the evening of the day it was released.
[BH: Let me begin by saying I don't know Tom Flocco. I have never spoken to him, nor communicated with him, though it was suggested I do so by mutual acquaintances. But I have seen Mr. Flocco promote stories from the likes of Ted Gunderson and John DeCamp, such as the Gannon/Gosch Whitehouse Homosexual Prostitute debacle. The "sources" mentioned here leave much to be desired, especially when you consider that government (FBI, Division 5) stooge Tim White was also used by Gunderson and DeCamp in spreading this story, which appeared on hundreds of websites all over the World Wide Web.

Now, how do we know who these "U.S. Intelligence" sources are? Yes, I'm aware that there are credible sources within the intelligence community who give information to journalists. At times in the past, I've used them myself. But I stopped that practice several years ago. I was hoodwinked enough times to realize that if I couldn't corroborate information independently, it was likely not accurate or credible. I am no longer willing to take the chance. And when someone is making claims of this magnitude, I for one need to know WHO ALL they are. I also need some evidence, or I can't believe a story is based on facts.

Now, we also hear Tom Flocco claiming that David Icke and Jeff Rense are "great patriots". I beg to differ. Firstly, David Icke is not an American. He's British and a former mainline journalist in the U.K.. So, of what country is he a "patriot"?

Icke also claims, in his writings, that Jesus Christ never existed. That alone is enough to tell me what his agenda is. As well, Icke is known to be associated with Ted Gunderson and other disinfo specialists (surprise, surprise).

In fact, that's how I first met Icke, at a conference in Atlanta (1997) which I attended on a press pass, where Ted Gunderson (I was working with Ted at the time) and David Icke were both speakers on the topic of mind control. Though I only met Icke briefly, through Ted, I didn't like the vibes and avoided speaking further with him. From what I know of David Icke, he's a slick character who makes lots of money on his books and tapes promoting his far out "lizard people" theories. He also is known to scavenge much of his "information" (at least that which is based on facts) from other researchers and investigators without giving credit where it is due. No patriot here.

Now, we come to Jeff Rense. I don't know him but I do know some of his associates quite well. He had published a couple of my articles, years back, which he picked up from other sites, but I was blacklisted from his radio program, as I have been from many others, and always, always those who are "warned off" Barbara Hartwell by government disinfo agents. (People like Ted Gunderson, who by the way, has been a guest on Rense's program, as have other disinfo agents I know.) Which tells me all I need to know.

The fact that Rense promoted these stories, from dubious "cloak-and-dagger" sources does not surprise me. This is not to say that Rense has not had some very credible people on his radio program. He has, but for the most part, I find the lack of discernment unsettling. In any case, I can't see Jeff Rense as a "great patriot", not by any stretch of the imagination. A great patriot defends the Constitution and God-given (natural) unalienable, Constitutionally protected and guaranteed rights. Period. Case closed.]

3. The Chicago grand JURY the mainstream sometimes writes about is really at LEAST six or seven grand juries. I know they exist in several states; and I am personally aware of a couple people who have already testified and others who have presented evidence and/or additional grand jury demands to Mr. Fitzgerald. All those grand juries are probing White House(s) past and present--regarding murder, 9/11 and related financial issues at the minimum. The most important story I have ever written is the recent Cash payoffs, bonds and murder linked to White House 911 finance . The financial issues in that 9-11 related story have the juice to place congressmen and senators in prison. Don't miss the evidence document links either, as the documents have already been presented and evaluated by one of the grand juries.

4. One caveat. Just as in the past, a few things could stop the wheels of justice from completely turning this time around: little things like bribery, murder, bombings and/or marshal law--all of which are quite possible, given this coterie of criminals. But even then, I have been told that U.S. intelligence is closely monitoring the probes and will go after Fitzgerald if he and the other prosecutors fail to do their job. I have heard that elements of the military and intelligence have refused to obey presidential orders over the past couple weeks. That is astonishing in and of itself.

5. This could be a very interesting fall; and I will be shocked if the President, members of his cabinet, agency officials and some members of Congress have not already inquired about seeking asylum in Australia or another similar English-speaking country to flee potential charges of treason, murder, obstruction of justice and other crimes. I have also been told there is evidence proving the Supreme Court is dirty and their law clerks and one Justice on the Court have already testified against other Justices regarding 2000 election fraud after an attempt to bribe the Justice testifying against other members. Quite incredible stuff. And can you imagine the implications: a five-year fraudulent presidency which sent troops to die and be maimed for life based on lies!

6. The crimes are so great that executions are a distinct possiblity, IF the officials involved are successfully brought to trial. The stakes are high and powerful officials will attempt anything to avoid justice--even destroying U.S. cities. In the wake of my JFK Jr. story, there are now grand juries in separate states probing information and evaluating evidence. I have sat with my mouth wide open while listening to other stories which are widespread among the intelligence community. I have been told that 60% of the intelligence community is ready to see the administration removed from office and fully prosecuted, 10% are too timid to take sides and the other 30% are loyal to the administration.

7. So, it's a very difficult situation for the country. But think of the example which could be set for the rest of the world if three presidents and a senator were severely punished for their crimes against America. The cleansing would be dramatic; and it would open the way for prosecution against the media and Congress for ongoing obstruction of justice with accompanying prison terms.

There you have it: my current--albeit short--take on the grand juries no one wants to talk about, and with the fall just about upon us. But God is in control of what happens to America. This all goes back to events surrounding our forefathers at the outset of U.S. independence. And remember, French sons who helped America in the past are buried on U.S. soil from 1776, 1812 and very recently--in 2005. The crime has to stop. Period. Thanks to all for your support and to those who bought "Loose Change" 9/11 DVDs to help keep the site up online and pay band-width/website expenses.

For honest government--in our lifetime,

Tom Flocco

[BH: Okay, I'm certainly aware of the magnitude of crimes and also of some of the Grand Jury proceedings. Some of my written testimony has been submitted in connection with some of the criminals in government. I'm on the witness list as well for several of these investigations and I don't have a lot to say about that at this time, except that there are a number of criminals in government I'd love to testify against for things like obstruction of justice, murder, criminal conspiracy and racketeering. I've got the evidence too, for crimes to which I was an eyewitness and/or from my own investigations. But for me to believe that Bush and Cheney have actually been indicted, I would need a far, far more credible source than the writings of Tom Flocco and his secret-cloak-and-dagger- black-ops- intelligence-insiders. Sorry, I can't buy it, not without seeing the evidence with my own eyes.]


[BH: Rosalee Grable aka The Web Fairy has been posting lies about Barbara Hartwell for years, along with some of her cohorts, though I've only seen a fraction of them. Grable doesn't know me and I have never had any communications with her. Where she gets her "information" is anyone's guess. But she is tied in with some of the same government disinfo crowd and their minions, including Larry Lawson and Todd Fahey. She bills herself as a "Discordian" and has promoted some outlandish theories about 9-11. If memory serves, something about holographic images of planes crashing into the WTC towers.

Whatever.....Since this "Web Fairy" has shown up here with a message thread from BATR, a group which has a mixed bag of members, some of whom I consider credible (Carl Worden and Liz Michael, for example) and others who are just whackjobs (Todd Brendan Fahey and the religious nut JAH, for example) and since my name has been added to the mix, I'll address this passage, below.]

Excerpt from a message, BATR

(Posted by Mike Knapp. Signed by Paul from Poker Face.)

On recent attacks of patriot writers by Carl Worden

"Carl... I have found many of your posts in the past to be just that...propaganda, or trying to slander someone else. Tom Flocco and Greg Szymanski* have a lot more credibility then you on any one subject. *I have seen you repost articles from dis info agent provocateurs of the likes of stewie webb and barbara hartwell that made me cringe, but made me make a note to myself as to take anything from you with a grain of salt...
paul from poker face"

"Writing the soundtrack to Americas 2nd American Revolution"

[BH: Well, I don't see Carl Worden as a slanderer. Just because he demands facts and evidence and credible, named sources. That's slander? Not in my book. I respect Carl Worden because he does not go flying off the handle with outlandish theories and is not willing to promote information unless he believes it to be factual. What's wrong with that? And Carl made some good points about Tom Flocco which I can't help but agree with. This "Paul" whom I do not know and have never heard of until today, also considers Barbara Hartwell a "disinfo agent provocateur". Now, I wonder who/what his sources are?

And by the way, "Paul from Pokerface", I am not joined at the hip with Stew Webb and am damned sick and tired of hearing these lies, spread by the likes of Ted Gunderson, Ken Adachi, Tim White and Larry Lawson. Stew is my good friend. I know him to be a sincere patriot and Christian. He is a good man. That's enough for me. He publishes my work on his website and we have worked together over the past four years on some cases. We certainly have common enemies among the criminals in government.

But there are definitely some times when Stew and I don't agree on the issues or on what constitutes credible journalism, sources or evidence. At these times, we agree to disagree. He goes his way, and I go mine. I know that Stew has been involved, in some measure, in these recent Tom Flocco reports, which I declined to be a part of, since my requirements are strict for evidence and because I am aware of certain other issues that I would rather not speak of, as I have no wish to hurt people unnecessarily. People who may be trying to do the right thing, but in my opinion, going about it the wrong way. So, next time you want to spread some government-sponsored disinfo about me, hire a fact checker to corroborate your sources, would you? Thank you.]

To sum up, I should say that I wish every person who claims to be a journalist would adhere to standards of journalistic integrity. Check your sources for credibility. Check the facts. Don't accept anonymous cloak-and-dagger sources as gospel truth. Know their names, or dismiss them. Find independent corroboration for your story.

And meanwhile, if you want a real revolution, work for it! Go out and do something. A revolution is not created by "keyboard commandos" who argue endlessly on message boards about who's who and what's what in the so-called "patriot community"; or who spend their time waging gratuitous attacks on people they don't know, usually because of envious spite, or because they're parroting disinfo they heard through the grapevine. Some are patriots, some are not.

Do they, first and foremost, defend God-given (natural) unalienable, Constitutionally protected and guaranteed rights? Or do they promote conspiracy theories, grandstanding to get attention for themselves? You be the judge. By their fruits shall you know them.

Barbara Hartwell
September 14, 2005

Hartwell & Sosbee Vs. Gov't Rat Bastards & Useful Idiots

NOTE: As part of a continuing series, documenting political persecution against Barbara Hartwell and Geral Sosbee, see these letters and reports, from the Hartwell Files, 2004.


August, 2004

The most compelling subject in my opinion today is the inhumane war on mankind now being waged by the United States, especially as directed by the fbi and the cia. I presently see very little coverage of this topic anywhere, even while the criminal activities of these two evil agencies escalates before our very eyes (i.e.: the cia lying to Congress about weapons of mass destruction, thereafter dragging US to war; the fbi and the cia use of high tech to kill/incapacitate the Targets; the fbi's wholesale and unjustifiable killings of our people).

Moreover when I attempt to focus attention on the ongoing (and past) atrocities of these two corrupt agencies, the little ones (whom I describe on my site as mental dwarfs) verbally attack or otherwise slander me. So, let the record show that each of you in so assaulting me and my work stand as prime examples of the low and sinister mentality that dominates politics, law and public policy in this country; by your ignorance you assist the fbi and the cia in keeping the voice of liberty muted, and you will therefore be remembered as cowards and "scum bags" (to use Barbara Hartwell's words). You should indeed be ashamed of yourselves, but your lack of good sense and conscience preclude introspection .

In your writings you exhibit the ugly side of mankind (that part devoid of sensitivity to the suffering of others and that part that cares not about improving the human condition today); in person I am quite certain that intelligent company is something you sorely miss and in a sense I am grateful that I do not have to look upon your empty blank faces, for there be nothing there of interest to the discerning artist/thinker/philanthropist. Finally, and again for the record,you are each in default of your duty (or responsibility) to society according to one we all know who stated:

"It is the duty of every citizen according to his best capacities to give validity to his convictions in political affairs". --Albert Einstein

Finally, as I have no realistic expectation that the fbi or the cia will be reigned in by the Congress (and knowing by experience that the courts are equally cowardly to hold the fbi/cia accountable), I have little energy left to fight this battle alone.

Geral Sosbee


Thank you for your interest in Barbara and me. The punks and assassins of the intelligence agencies (the alphabet agencies) are killing Barbara and me in inches. I accept it because they have taken all that was once beautiful and graceful from me; I have only the desire now to damage the fbi and the cia where it hurts them most: in world public opinion, and I intend to continue to do so in an intellectual sense (not a physical or violent way) until I drop dead. 

Barbara, on the other hand, should receive world support for her battle with the government rat bastards and she is the true hero in the unfolding story of the fbi/cia killing spree because she dare go where even the bravest men or women I have ever heard of have gone: straight into their little minds and schemes to show them that she, not they, is the real boss; and she even helps out others caught in the torture net (like me) as she herself is being torn apart (physically and emotionally).

Geral Sosbee


May 28, 2004

Barbara Hartwell
Legal Defense & Research Trust


Marilyn A. Guinnane:

This is the first and only warning you will receive from me. You have been engaging in character assassination and libel by writing letters to various people, including Geral Sosbee [letter below]. Unless I receive a written retraction and apology from you, your name will be added to a public list of those engaging in such defamation and libel against me and which may also be included in any future civil lawsuits to be filed.

Your first letter to Mr. Sosbee has already been published, as part of my report in response, titled NO SUBSTITUTE FOR STUPIDITY:GOV'T STOOGE'S BACKLASH which is posted on several public message boards, and my own website.

I suggest you read this report, as it will provide just a small preview of what is to come if you continue your foolish and unscrupulous activities. The more you shoot off your loud, misinformed mouth, the more ammunition you will give me to refute your false and libelous allegations with hard facts; and to expose additional detailed, accurate information about those to whom you have given your stamp of approval.

If you think you are helping your "friends" Don Stacey and Susan Ford by your ill-considered, hysterical outpourings of gibberish, you need to think again. If anything, you are serving as a hindrance to their agenda and will soon be seen as a liability. If they really need a junkyard dog to defend their territory, perhaps it would behoove them to find one with some serious teeth. Noisy barking dogs like yourself are expendable, especially when they only make their handlers look foolish by association.

Now, in your latest missive to Geral Sosbee you falsely accuse me of committing a criminal action. I don't give a tinker's damn what you believe about me; about Geral Sosbee; about Don Stacey, or about anyone else. Your glaring ignorance of the law and of the various subjects about which you make pathetic and laughable attempts to write is not my problem. Your inane mindset is not my problem. Your stupidity is not my problem. The malice in your heart against me or others who have done nothing wrongful to inspire it, is not my problem.

Here's my problem: You are publishing lies and character assassination about me.

Your presumptuous and intrusive attempts to interfere in situations that are none of your business will not be tolerated. I can assure you that you know absolutely NOTHING about me, nor about my professional or personal background.

Perhaps you enjoy being a stooge and toady for government operatives, like so many others who have jumped to the defense of those whose crimes and corruption I have exposed; the very same stooges who have gone on a rampage of verbal assaults against me. But I can promise you that you will not get away with your gratuitous libel of me, nor your unconscionable meddling. Mark my words: One way or another there will be a heavy price to pay.

In my considered professional opinion, as a former intelligence agent; as a psychotherapist; one holding a post-graduate degree at the doctorate level, you are at best, a mentally and emotionally unstable, loud-mouthed moron. A silly, shallow, approval-seeking twit whose low self-esteem is fertile ground for spawning a hero-worship complex. Trouble is, you've picked the wrong heroes. But again, not my problem.

Worship and idolize whom you will. Make a fool of yourself all over the World Wide Web, for all I care. Sell your sob stories about life-threatening pneumonia (sounds to me like he's a got a case of the "CIA Flu") to anyone willing to buy them. Just get the hell off my case. Cease and desist your libelous assaults on my character and professional reputation now, Guinnane.

And stop your meddling unless you are really such a flaming idiot, you don't know better than to tangle with a professional. It's clear that you have no idea whom you're dealing with, but I can assure you that you picked the wrong woman to mess with. If you'd like a full-scale war, if you insist, I'll be happy to oblige. Otherwise, get the hell out of the line of fire and return to your cheap seat in the peanut gallery where you belong.

Barbara Hartwell
May, 2004

Marilyn Guinnane's Harassing Letter to Geral Sosbee:

"Mr. Sosbee,

Seeing as a terrible crime has been committed, in that Hartwell dragged Don Stacey's excellent reptutation through the mud, and seeing as he's fighting for his life and frankly, I have my doubts that he'll make it, as he's been battling pneumonia for going on two years, never quite recovering, never 100%, and this last instance when it flared up knocked him for a loop, what can be done to make restitution? Someone needs to do something. He told me he was reeling from what she wrote. That, no doubt, would give her perverse satisfaction.

She has done him a grave injustice, and I too am reeling from it. There's no excuse! No excuse! Do you understand?!!!

Now tell me, what's to be done? What.

All of you: you, the wannabe editors of that miserable site, that pathetic poor excuse for a woman Hartwell, all of you ought to hang your heads in shame. What was printed was yellow journalism at its worst, all hearsay and conjecture from a b---- who sports fangs in lieu of teeth. A crime against a hero who has told me repeatedly that he wants his grandchildren to grow up in a free country, so he tirelessly gets the word out, never discouraged, never giving quitting even a passing glance. Sick as a dog he gets behind his 'puter and sends reams of informative news articles, which he gleans from sources all over the world, waking people up, waking people up.

"I've been saving this," Hartwell wrote of him. Right, I'll just bet she has.

Tell me, Mr. Sosbee, what's to be done now? You ripped into me, in defense of your "best friend", so be a little responsible here. Well?!

Marilyn A. Guinnane"

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

AFFIDAVIT of Ex-FBI Whistleblower Geral Sosbee



On this 27th day of February 2007, appeared before me Geral W. Sosbee, an individual known personally to me to be the person who affixed his signature to this document below and who, being by me first duly sworn on his oath, deposed and said:

“My name is Geral W. Sosbee; I am over the age of 18 years. I am fully competent in all manner to make this affidavit. The information contained in this affidavit is within my personal knowledge, and is true and correct. I am referred to below as Affiant.

I have documented by direct and incontrovertible evidence and personal testimony the criminal activities of dozens (or perhaps hundreds) of agents, operatives and handlers of the FBI and the CIA of the United States of America, including, but not limited to the following:

A. Obstruction of Justice, Suppression of Evidence, Perjury, Fabrication of Evidence, Criminal Conspiracy, Conspiracy to Violate and the Violation of Civil Rights, Attempted Extortion, Attempted Blackmail, False Arrest, False Imprisonment, Fraud Burglary, Robbery, Felonious Assault and Battery, Destruction of Personal Property, Petty Theft, Theft of and Tampering with U.S. Mail and a variety of other high crimes and misdemeanors as further described in paragraph “B” below.

B. Abuse of civil process, home and car invasions facilitated by physical and wireless electronic surveillance in home and car and further enhanced by the use of a tracking device implanted in the person of the human experimentee, the Affiant; the surveillance of Affiant is in effect as this affidavit is written and has been in effect twenty four hours a day, seven days a week, three hundred and sixty-five days a year, without cessation and without interruption for well over nine years world wide; all such invasive surveillance is accompanied by various terrorist acts against the Affiant as further described in paragraph “C” below.

C. Repeated assault and battery on the person of the Affiant by street thugs and by the use of high technology authorized by the United States Government under a program known as Non-consensual Cover Research and Human Experimentation; in this program the FBI and the CIA perform a wide variety of terrorist assaults on the Affiant; one such assault is accomplished by the injection (or placing) into the Affiant various chemicals, bacterial and viral infections; concomitant with the chemical and biological assaults the FBI and the CIA activate against the Affiant advanced Remote Electronic Human Behavior Influence Technology including psychoelectronic and directed energy assaults sometimes coordinated with fraudulently conceived and illegally carried out (with local police authorities world wide) attempted criminal sting operations designed to lead to the imprisonment or death of the Affiant; also in conjunction with such hi- tech experimentations the Affiant is subjected to FBI and CIA psychological operations (including conditioned response and operant conditioning techniques) which are all designed to cause the Affiant to have a nervous breakdown, physical collapse or to otherwise seek final exit from the torturous campaign, the effects of which are often viewed in real time by the FBI & CIA tormentors who actually watch on computer screens the Affiant react to the injurious and painful dirty tricks and provocations described herein, all such treasonous, inhumane and covert operations are carried out with the full support of all government entities at every level of society as further explained in paragraph “D” below.

D. All three branches of the United States Government (and segments of the community at large) are compliant with the mandates of FBI and CIA terrorist assaults as described above and all government officials at the local, state and federal levels pretend that no such criminal activity as described in the instant affidavit may occur; thus, to date the Congress of the United States, the entire Judiciary and each and every employee of the Executive branch of the government of the United States of America may directly or indirectly support the terrorist activities of the FBI and the CIA asset forth herein and as further amplified in paragraph “E” below.

E. I hereby incorporate by reference into this affidavit and thereby make a part herein as though fully reproduced herein for all purposes the contents of my website (and related links and statements by Affiant therein) located at; this incorporation includes all statements, documents and other corroborating evidence provided, obtained or authorized by Affiant, including all updates by Affiant at and any other internet site to date.

I hereby further certify and affirm under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States and the laws of the state of Texas that all statements, including those incorporated by reference and made a part herein for all purposes as though fully reproduced herein are true and correct, and that all documents (including those incorporated by reference) are true and correct copies of originals and that they are what they purport to be to the best of my knowledge and ability.
Further, Affiant sayeth Naught.”

Notary Seal

Sylvia A. Lopez
My Commission Expires October 10, 2007 _______________________

Geral W. Sosbee

Sworn to and subscribed before me on the 27th day of February, 2007, to witness which I place my hand and official seal of office.

Notary Seal

Sylvia A. Lopez
My Commission Expires
October 10, 2007 _________________________
Sylvia A. Lopez, Notary Public
In and for Cameron County,

Sunday, February 25, 2007

100% Disabled, Not Eligible for Disability Benefits: Death by Government

March, 2003 was the last time I was able to see a medical doctor. At that time, I had sought medical care for an acute, but persistent and debilitating illness, brought on by extreme stress; and by exposure to electromagnetic radiation (directed energy antipersonnel weapons.) But in addition to this illness, I had other longstanding chronic illness, plus disabilities, all of which were a direct result of longterm abuses by criminal perpetrators in the United States government.

The other diagnoses of chronic illness and disabilities, made over a period of many years by various physicians and specialists (allopathic, homeopathic, naturopathic, chiropractic, ayurvedic, etc.) were also confirmed by this doctor.

The doctor, though an M.D., practiced naturopathic medicine, which is why I chose her. I have never trusted doctors (a result of my horrid experiences with those in the medical profession, connected to CIA) and resorted to allopathic medicine only in cases where I needed surgery or other medical intervention --matters of greatest urgency.

The doctor well understood why I was chronically ill. This woman, an "expert witness" in 'Legal Abuse Syndrome', also understood that I was financially destitute, had no health insurance, and was "not eligible" for disability benefits of any kind.

And after speaking with me at length, and listening to my story, she understood precisely WHY I was "not eligible" for ANYTHING which might help me survive --not disability benefits; not a pension; not even social security.

The truth is, I am a "ghost" who has fallen through the cracks of every government system imaginable. I have no official "employment history" (that's the deniability of "non-official cover") and have not paid into the social security system. I have never in my life held any sort of "regular job".

The truth is, the U.S. Government got hold of me when I was a small child, recruited me (without my consent or knowledge) into their black programs, utilized me for twenty-five (25) years of my adult life (1969-1994) in various CIA operations; exploited me for my talents and areas of professional expertise --then denied my existence, after I managed to break free, following years of battles with my handlers.

Though "denying" me as one of their former operatives, they then began to persecute me, by any and every means possible (and they have unlimited resources, including technology and manpower) in their neutralization campaign.

To put it mildly, "they done me wrong". And from long years of experience, long years of attempting to find some way to get justice for a lifetime of being exploited and victimized, resulting in tremendous pain and suffering, incalculable losses, I have concluded that there is most likely nothing I can do about it. At least not the "justice" part. I can only hold on to the belief that God will serve justice, in God's time and in God's way.

But back to my medical consultation in March, 2003. At that time, I was diagnosed as 100% disabled. This, of course, is a legal term relating to persons who are incapable of holding any sort of regular employment, due to chronic illness/disabilities. This was no newsflash to me; it was the same basic diagnosis I'd received from doctors in the past.

I won't go into detail about chronic illness and disability, especially in a public report. I've mentioned some of this (in a limited fashion) in past reports; but I've never been a health bore, and don't intend to become one. I also greatly value my privacy. In the past, when I first went public with my case, I made the mistake of being more open about illness and disability, my purpose being simply to document the abuses by government for the public record.

This was in the days when I had a public e-mail address. Unfortunately, I was inundated with e-mails from people I didn't know, busybodies offering unsolicited advice; some even in the form of amateur medical diagnoses or psychoanalysis! There was also the fundamentalist religious proselytizing, and the usual New Age adherents with their "blame-the-victim" ideology. It was absolutely dreadful and the last thing I needed, so I took steps to protect my privacy by removing e-mail contact info from my website.

For the most part, I don't even talk to friends and family anymore about my health. I have found it to be a bad policy. In my experience, people tend to make unwarranted assumptions; jump to conclusions; or offer amateur "medical" advice, which I have not asked for, and which they are unqualified to give. If I wanted medical advice, I'd see a doctor, that is, if I could afford one.

But there is a point to be made; and a reason I am publishing this report. The point is, I have no reliable source of support (financial or otherwise) of any kind. I have no prospects either. Things just keep getting worse. I am isolated, destitute and disabled, incapable of any sort of gainful "employment" and with nowhere to turn for help.

Although I have tried, repeatedly, to "get through" to some of my family and the few close friends I still have (at least those who have expressed concern for my general wellbeing) about the true nature of my situation, they do not seem to "hear" the truth I am speaking about my own life. Since none of them are in such a situation, I don't expect them to necessarily "understand".

The only thing I have ever expected is that they would at the very least have enough respect to "acknowledge" the truth, without trying to minimize; sanitize or trivialize the facts on which that truth is based. But, for the most part, they haven't even been willing (or able) to do that.

The facts are as follows: I am 100% disabled (in the legal sense) with no access to medical care and "not eligible" for disability benefits.

I have managed to stay alive, for many years, only by the grace of God --and through Christian charity; donations from friends and family, and in the past, (though not in recent history) by donations from the public, people who found my work valuable and wanted to support that work --investigating and exposing government corruption; defending liberty, political activism, etc.

I am now unable to continue that work. I can't do investigations --that costs money. I am unable to travel, my health is too poor, no transportation, no money for travel expenses. Presently, I am not even able to make phone calls, as I cannot afford a phone card.

The plethora of outrageous lies being published about me, in the massive government-sponsored libel campaign, have caused many people to withdraw their support; or not offer it to begin with.

Some people withdrew their financial support because they mistakenly thought it "bought" them the right to meddle in my personal and/or professional business; or to violate my privacy by disclosing personal confidences. Simply put, they did not respect my personal boundaries. When confronted on this issue, their response was to self-righteously withdraw support, rather than acknowledge their inappropriate behavior and treat me with respect.

But the bottom line is this: Unless I get some concrete support --soon-- in the form of money to pay for desperately needed medical care, I don't believe I'm long for this world.

The rat bastards in the government have set the groundwork --years of abuses, poisonings; attacks with 'non-lethal' weaponry; arranged car crashes; extreme stress and trauma caused by psy-war tactics; criminal harassment, stalking, etc. etc. It has never ended......

I have experienced worsening illness since the New Year, but cannot afford to see a doctor. It seems to me like a case of the 'CIA flu'.....I can't pin down the cause, I can only attempt to deal with the painful symptoms.

These bastards don't have to do much more --the damage is done and the fix is in. But that's the way they planned it. I would say it could be considered the 'perfect murder'....under plausible deniability.

It's also an outrage --one that didn't have to happen; but one I want to make damn certain sure is documented as to WHY.

In order to relieve the stress, the best I have been able to do is withdraw from the world, unplug the phone and pray for peace in my own life. I pray for a miracle of healing (with God, all things are possible) --as I do for others I know to be in similar circumstances-- who like myself, may well be in the last stages of Death by Government.

Barbara Hartwell
February 25, 2007

Seek ye first the Kingdom of God and His justice, and all these things shall be 
added unto you.
Luke 12-31

Saturday, February 24, 2007

Ex-FBI Agent's Tribute to Barbara Hartwell

NOTE, February, 2007: In July, 2005, I wrote a report (in the form of an affidavit) outlining the political persecution I have been targeted for. I did not have a website at that time, so I just sent it to a small e-mail list, with permission to forward and post the report.

Some time later, I found that Geral Sosbee had posted my report, as well as this preface, in support of me.

Over the course of years, there have been so few people who even begin to understand what it is like being targeted by the government for neutralization. Geral is one of those few.

To this day, the persecution continues, in various forms, against both Geral and myself.


Work and Friendship of Barbara Hartwell

By ex-FBI agent Geral Sosbee

Aug 3, 2005

From about the time I first posted my story about the fbi/cia torture campaign to silence me until now, at least two individuals emerged from the seemingly intangible and infinite spaces of the internet to announce their considered belief in my reports: Giovanni Flores of Italy and Barbara Hartwell of USA. I paid tribute to the inimitable Giovanni on my site; now, I salute the truly remarkable (for her courage) Barbara Hartwell.

She came out of nowhere (to use a worn but true cliche) to befriend me when the fbi in Los Angeles, California, taxed my sanity to the limit with their sinister assaults and inhumane provocations. Barbara tutored me almost daily on survival techniques necessary to overcome the fbi's psychological operations.

Most of all Barbara offered me her friendship and her understanding of the nightmare life thrust upon me, and for that I am grateful to my dying breath. I was never really able to do much to help Barbara in her on going battles with the punks and thugs of the fbi and the cia , due to the unending trauma that I was and am dealing with in my life as a result of rough and treacherous methodologies of these rogue and out of control agencies.

Today, I pray that all of God's forces touch graciously the heart and soul of Barbara to remind her that all the world benefits from her work and from her friendship to those under attack by the hooligans of the intelligence services of the United States. In return for her dangerous work on behalf of freedom lovers of all times , Barbara receives no tangible benefit. She continues to be harassed, assaulted and financially abandoned by the nation she served.

While Barbara could not be properly compensated for the losses she has suffered at the direction of the thugs and the assassins of the fbi/cia, she deserves a redress of her grievances; and even though she could never be made whole by efforts to address the injuries put upon her, she deserves the chance to try to gain some semblance of a normal life (i.e.: one free of torture.)

This nation will never see another of her kind anytime soon, and I am most fortunate to have had contact with her during my own ordeal. I hope that all who read this note will say a silent prayer for Barbara and be sure to include as I do regularly a heart felt 'THANK YOU BARBARA for all you gave in defense of liberty'. The following article by Barbara [affidavit on political persecution] explains more succinctly the effects of fbi and cia assaults on this national treasure, Barbara Hartwell.

Geral Sosbee

Monday, February 19, 2007

Rick Stanley Fights Our Battle in Colorado Court

OPINION RELEASE: John Klar - Rick Stanley Fights Our Battle in Colorado Court

STANLEY NOTE: My thanks for a well written essay by John Klar. The Oral Arguments are Feb 27, 2007 at 9:30 AM MST at the Colorado Court of Appeals at the Colorado Supreme Court building at 14th and Broadway in Denver, CO. Freedom and liberty are not free. Certainly not in the POLICE STATE OF AMERICA. Vigilence is required. Sometimes we must put ourselves in harm's way for an ideal that most take for granted. 

Our children and grandchildren have no idea the dangers they face, and we owe them, that we must pay the price for freedom and liberty now. They sprang from our loins. They trusted us to do what is required to keep them safe and that they will have the opportunity for the persuit of happiness one day after our stewardship as parents and grandparents. Would you not die for the liberty of your children and grandchildren? That is the question isn't it? Are we willing to do what must be done for liberty? Sadly, most will never even ask themselves the question. It does not fit into their narcissitic life of indulgence and greed.

Rick Stanley Fights Our Battle in Colorado Court
By John Klar

Many people may not have a full appreciation of Rick Stanley's battle with the judiciary/government, the latest skirmish of which is scheduled for hearing at the Colorado Court of Appeals on Feb 27, 2007 at 9:30 AM. Because I am an attorney who is familiar with the facts of Rick's case, I am writing to explain just how absurd this case against Rick is. Instead of being a case about a guy who pushed too far, this is more of a case about a "justice" system that has in fact gone way over the edge, and which reveals its true corrupt nature in the lengths it will go to penalize someone like Rick Stanley.

Let us first examine the back-drop for Rick's circumstances. As a state senate candidate who felt strongly that the City of Denver's newly passed ordinance banning the carrying of firearms was an unconstitutional abridgement of his right to bear arms, Rick deliberately wore a loaded sidearm in Denver. After being arrested, Rick the challenged another similar ordinance in Thornton, CO and was arrested again. Now some may regard this as deliberately provocative, but clearly this was an exercise of free speech: Rick's goal was not to "get away" with carrying a weapon like a gang member with a concealed handgun. He possessed a legal firearm, and wore it openly in a deliberate effort to publicize what he felt was a violation of the law. How else would he effectively draw attention to the issue that people were too uninformed or too sheepish to address. Ed Brown has taken a similar if more drastic action in New Hampshire - had he just gone to jail like an obedient slave, he would not have drawn nearly the attention that he has to the actions of the federal government. In fact, he would have modeled submission to what he perceives as tyranny.

Many may feel that Ed's and Rick's actions are extreme, and that they "asked for it." Some may not agree with Rick's interpretation of the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. But the Colorado Constitution is very clear in its protection of the individual's right to bear firearms, and Rick's convictions would be impermissible now because the Colorado legislature has enacted a statute prohibiting the kinds of ordinances Rick was protesting: in other words, Rick's stance has been unequivocally proven to be correct under Colorado law. But all should appreciate what happened to Rick next. After Rick was found guilty of violating the Denver and Thornton gun ordinances, he filed "motions" with the respective courts which stated that if he were incarcerated as a result of the these supposed violations, that warrants would issue by a militia group for the arrest and trial for treason of the judges who convicted him under the ordinance, for violating his (Americans') constitutional rights. He was subsequently arrested for these filings, and charged and then convicted on two counts of trying to influence a public official (felonies), and sentenced to three years on each count.

Aside from the issue of whether the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution was violated by these sentences (the prohibition against "cruel and unusual punishment" includes a "proportionality" test to determine whether a criminal penalty is "grossly disproportionate to the severity of the crime" Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337, 346, 101 S.Ct. 2392, 69 L.Ed. 59 (1981)), it is apparent that even the prosecution of Rick for these pleadings was unconstitutional. This was clearly an effort by Rick to publicize his situation, and to stand on the Constitutional principles of our nation. He did not have actual militia warrants issued in secret, to be actually executed. The Courts apparently never made any showing that the judges were actually concerned for their safety; they didn't contact the police to protect them at the time; and they never established that there even was a militia to back up Rick's supposed "threat," or that they reasonably believed there was such a militia group. Could it be that the egos of these judges took exception to being criticized by a layperson?

Could it be that this was an effort to discourage militia groups, or to discourage Americans from resisting government efforts to restrict firearms? (Could it be that the government has sought to make examples of Ed and Elaine Brown to discourage Americans from questioning the federal government's authority to impose and collect an income tax?)

The core legal issue is whether the state can penalize constitutionally-protected speech. Americans, at least at one time, possessed broad free speech rights, subject to reasonable limitation. One such limitation is content: threats to kill or torture others are outside of the scope of protected free speech (though they are now codified for the feds to actually perform rather than just say, in the case of "enemy combatants." No irony here.?) Because this can indeed be a fine line to draw, courts have tried to make that line clear for application. The most recent law on the subject states that "true threats" are statements in which the speaker "means to communicate a serious expression of an intent to commit an act of unlawful violence to a particular individual or group of individuals."

If we apply this standard to Rick's case, it is apparent that he did not go over this line. Consider:

1) There was no actual threat of violence. To "threaten" to have someone arrested is apparently not deemed an act of violence when issued by an American court. And in Rick's case, he was clearly relying on a Constitutional provision for holding errant jurists accountable - he was invoking the law of the land. The "act" threatened was to have these judges arrested and tried for treason, which implies that they would obtain a trial with constitutional protections, and the threat of arrest is hardly a threat of violence, whether or not that arrest is lawful.

2) The most sacred of protected forms of speech is political speech. Location and vulgarity may be restricted (e.g., public schools, or foul language). But political speech is granted more protection than, say, artistic speech. And for good reason: the founding fathers rested our whole nation on this paramount principle, to prevent a new tyranny. Clearly Rick's court filings were true "political" free speech efforts. When he carried guns to flaunt unconstitutional ordinances, this was a form of free speech: by action. But the court filings were in written word, delivered right to the court. If this is not political speech deserving protection absent a clear showing of violent intent, what is?

3) It is quite a stretch to call these political free speech efforts "a serious expression of an intent to commit an act of unlawful violence." How serious was the threat, and how obvious to a grade schooler that Rick's motive was to publicize what he viewed as unlawful decisions by the courts?

Rick's pleadings claimed he was convicted pursuant to an unconstitutional law; he demanded that the judges involved overturn the conviction on constitutional grounds; he told them that their failure to do as he requested would trigger a charge of treason against them for their failure to remain faithful to their sworn oath of office to uphold and to defend the U.S. Constitution - which was a condition for them to become judges; and the treason charge would result in a "Mutual Defense Pact Militia warrant" being issued for their arrest if certain specified conditions were not met.

These formal pleadings led to Rick's arrest and conviction, and a sentence of six years in prison. The "threat" was conditional on those judges not reevaluating his convictions: certainly such a conditional threat is not an immediate threat of violence. Furthermore, how can this be said to be trying to influence a judge by threat, when Rick was relying on legal authority for his position, and even for the "threatened" consequences? How can these pleadings be construed as "true threats" under Constitutional law?

Much more serious "threats" than Rick Stanley's have been thrown out of court over the years, and it can only be hoped that the Colorado Court of Appeals will wipe (some of) the egg off the judiciary's face by overturning these convictions, recognizing that Rick's offense was against juvenile egos that deserved it, not laws which were never intended to be applied in such an illogical and stifling way.

Meanwhile, we see people reading from the Bible being charged criminally with hate crimes, and an old man who suggested that in Saddam Hussein we "hung the wrong man" being visited by Secret Service agents. We are at war, folks, to retain our freedoms. Rick Stanley has spent tens of thousands of dollars and many years fighting this battle, at great personal risk. He has been raided and persecuted, and his business undermined. Rick is doing something which is tangible and which publicizes these issues, at great personal sacrifice. He is thus an American hero, lacking in these cowardly times. I see Ed Brown the same way, even though I for religious reasons do not agree with his use of violence and risk of death on these facts - it is not for me to condemn Ed for not embracing my religious views. It is his right to fight by the means he deems fit, and he is still fighting the same battle as the rest of us should be fighting. (For me and many other Christians, it is not my right to fight government when it curtails my God-given freedoms, but it is my duty to fight that government when it commands me to violate God's laws: my day is coming..) We can support Ed Brown and Rick Stanley without endorsing their means, because they are still fighting the good fight, and to fail to support them is to allow our rogue government to divide us.

In any event, there is no issue with regard to Rick Stanley's means in his pending case - he did not use violence or even a viable threat thereof, and yet he has been sentenced to an extraordinarily harsh penalty. The Colorado judges violated his Constitutional rights in so doing, whatever the merits of his original permit violations. These judges thus violate all of our rights: their offense is against all Americans who would embrace the Constitutional freedoms on which our nation was founded. To abandon Rick's fight as not our own is to abandon ourselves, and our children. To abandon Ed Brown's fight as not our own is similar cowardice. Wake up, America, and retake your land from these intimidating government thugs, or be enslaved, and know you deserve your slavery!

Using Homeland Security to Persecute Ex-FBI Whistleblower Sosbee

NOTE: My good friend and professional colleague, ex-FBI agent Geral Sosbee, a high-profile target for persecution by FBI/CIA, sent me the following testimony. Geral regularly documents the harassment, assaults and outrages, including upon his person, by the fascist element (including FBI/CIA) who act with impunity to continually disrupt and destroy his life.

This type of brutal 'neutralization campaign' is what happens to those of us (former law enforcement, intelligence) who have stood up for Liberty and have become whistleblowers on government corruption.

The human/constitutional rights violations (ongoing for many years), reported by Geral and myself, and once reserved for high-profile targets, have now become increasingly commonplace, as criminals in government have institutionalized this evil through abominations such as the Patriot Acts and Homeland Security.

And the following report from Geral represents but a small snapshot of the harassment directed against him. I have collected large files of his testimony, going back to 2001. And I will continue to post reports from those files, as well as updates on Geral Sosbee's situation as a target of government persecution.

For more information, see my report, Targeted for Terror: Ex-FBI Agent's Gruesome Ordeal, on this site.

February 18, 2007

By Geral Sosbee

Over the past four years the U.S. Border Patrol, Customs and now Homeland Security (hereinafter, ' HS ') has harassed Sosbee upon his re-entry into the uSA from Mexico at the Matamoros Mexico/ Brownsville, Texas international checkpoints. Most recently Sosbee regularly sleeps in Mexico in order to avoid fbi's continued poisonings, etc. In order to facilitate Sosbee's re-entry into the United States from Mexico on a regular basis, Sosbee applied for and received admission into the "Sentry" program administered by HS at the border check point. 

HS and the U.S. Immigration, Customs, Border Patrol and other federal authorities approved of Sosbee's clearance after criminal background checks, interviews, fingerprinting, etc. Admission into the "AIS" (Sentry program) gives Sosbee access to the express lane daily (not weekends) from Mexico into the U.S. No other rights are intended to be conveyed by the pass. 

However, the pass indicates that the person of Geral w. Sosbee and his car are recognized by HS as worthy of the trust implied by the granting of the pass. HS in this regard issues a photo ID (#980088216) to Sosbee and *HS places a specially inscripted, bar coded, identification card on the front windshield inside Sosbee's vehicle (for easy access by HS). All such ID s were properly displayed by Sosbee at the check point, as was his US Passport.

On this date, at approximately 1:30 PM, as Sosbee was entering the uSA from Mexico he was told by the Homeland Security at the point of entry that his car has been selected by computer for inspection; prior to the inspection order, the officer asked Sosbee if he had anything to declare; Sosbee replied, 'No'. Then, the officer of HS ordered Sosbee to pull over into the inspection area, open all doors and hood, get out of the car, sit in a specified area, not use his phone for any purpose, and await the results of the inspection.

Sosbee complied; upon the termination of the inspection, Sosbee asked the two inspecting officials of HS as to why Sosbee was regularly harassed unnecessarily by HS at the check point (Note that the previous inspection involved the use of dogs and an extensive search of the vehicle). The HS official responded, there are many reasons why a person can be ordered for inspection; in this instance the official stated that Sosbee's vehicle is not from this area as evidenced by the license plates. Sosbee then responded that this statement is false. The license plates are issued to Sosbee who lives in Brownsville, Texas, by the State of Texas; the plates on Sosbee's vehicle are registered to a State recognized Texas Disabled veteran, and as such the plate is easily identifiable as locally based. the Texas license plate number on Sosbee's vehicle is DJX 1 DV

When Sosbee reported to the HS official that the stated reason for stopping Sosbee was false, Sosbee proved on the spot that the plates are local and state approved and that the * HS security pass on the windshield also contradicts the HS official's statement. Then, Sosbee asks to speak with a supervisor in order to determine exactly who placed Sosbee's license plates on the security point's computerized mandatory inspection list; the officer refused this request. 

Then Sosbee asked the officer to report this incident to his supervisor ; he again refused. Sosbee identified himself by the fbi identification shown at [link not given] and Sosbee explained that he believes that the fbi and the cia are interfering with HS work by distracting HS from its duties for the purpose of harassing a former intelligence officer of the fbi.

Sosbee also explained that all statements by Sosbee could be confirmed by visiting Sosbee's website. The HS officer stated he cannot report this to his supervisor because no one is interested and that he can't be seen by his supervisor as an officer who makes such a report. Sosbee adds that the HS official who entered the order to search Sosbee and his vehicle this date is corrupt and is therefore a threat to the security of the United States.

This update is being forwarded to as many government officials as possible.

[Also note that during the time that Sosbee reports this information as set forth in this update to "A Snapshot of My Typical Day", the fbi assaults Sosbee with nausea producing directed energy weaponry at the public library in Brownsville, Texas.]

Saturday, February 17, 2007

No Substitute for Stupidity: Gov't Stooge Marilyn Guinnane

NOTE, February, 2007: This report (from my old website) has been adapted to remove references to a website on which it was also posted, and its unscrupulous editor. However, the issues addressed in this report remain consistent and timely: Namely, government stooges who promote disinformation about government operatives and those being handled by them, as well as about legitimate whistleblowers and survivors of black operations.

May, 2004


All warfare is based on deception.
--Sun Tzu, The Art of War

Marilyn A. Guinnane, a former "flight attendant" and self-described "Writer", has emerged as one of the latest in a gaggle of loud-mouthed government stooges who have taken on the role of cheerleaders for the MK Ultra disinfo crowd, brazenly sallying forth, squawking in defense of Mr. Don Stacey, first exposed earlier this month, as part of a CIA containment operation hell bent on discrediting legitimate whistleblowers, high-level survivors of MK Ultra and CIA's related black operations.

In a letter written to ex-FBI agent Geral Sosbee [given below] the presumptuous and intrusive Ms. Guinnane oversteps her bounds once again in her shrill scolding of Mr. Sosbee for his defense and endorsement of Barbara Hartwell.

In fact, she is now harassing Geral Sosbee with daily unwanted e-mail to which he has no intention of responding. He's said all he has to say about the woman, whom he has dismissed as just another irksome "mental dwarf". Good call, Geral.

As for the ill-informed amateur Guinnane, her self-promoted claims to fame are: having her name listed in a "google" search; and having a few of her mediocre "letters to the editor" posted on (Yes, I took the time to read a few, all regurgitated rhetoric apparently based on the party-line, politically correct viewpoints of popular authors on 9-11; the merits of feminism, etc.)

But enough editorializing... why not let Ms. Guinnane speak for herself:


May 23, 2004

"Geral Sosbee,

I think it commendable in that you would defend your friend, Barbara Hartwell, just as I went to the aid of my friend, Don Stacey.

But I am here to tell you that without question, her attack on Don Stacey was not only unfounded, but riddled with more lies than you could shake a stick at. Unbelievable. I have concluded that she has either lost her mind, or is one rabid human being, and I'm sorry if she's endured MK Ultra, but that's no excuse to fabricate such incredible and vicious lies about someone, laced with more acid than a car's battery.

Look, break down her story: Why on God's earth would an investment banker suddenly affiliate himself with the CIA? Why would a seventy year old man start an investment banking firm that is a CIA 'front'? It's completely nuts.

Let me tell you of the absolute heroes I know of, fighting NWO tooth and nail and at great personal jeopardy: John Kaminski. His essays are read world-wide, and he is brilliant. Here's what Hartwell calls him: "A neo-Bolshevik." Well, that's cute, Babs, but when did you do much of anything but spew vitriol?

Another great hero: Sue Ford. She endured MK Ultra, as well. She wrote Thanks for the Memories, self-published, and deserves a medal for singing like a canary. Sue's daughter, MK Ultra victim as well, is incarcerated in an institution, so that (if I'm not mistaken) Don has helped her financially. What does our Barbara do? Slams Sue all over hell's half acre. What a swell gal, huh? I adore Sue Ford. And she adores Don Stacey. According to ol' Babs, Don is Sue's handler. PREPOSTEROUS, SIR!!!!! Ask Sue!!!! Hartwell lives in some kind of Loopy Land of the mind, whereupon she fantacizes all kinds of damaging-to-others crap that does not h! appen. Then she reports it as truth, and the likes of Geral Sosbee and [name removed] buy it, hook/line. Well, as P.T. Barnum said . . . "There's a . . . " ah, but you know the quote. After all, it applies.

But I've digressed.

Don Stacey is, in my estimation, the greatest hero of all. Not only is he indefatigable in his efforts to wake up Americans, but he's a thoroughly good person, through and through. I've never known anyone, save my dad, who deserved respect more than Don. He helps everybody. He even offered at one time to help Hartwell. When my husband died, he was the only one who asked if I was all right financially. The man is an absolute prince. He and I collaborate on letters that I write to newspaper editors. There's even one under my name, if you do a Google.

And Don is very ill. He's been battling pneumonia, in and out of the hospital so ! that they should keep a revolving door just for him. I'm worried silly about him, and someone unwittingly sent him Hartwell's cruel and vicious essay so that he read it upon coming home from yet another stay at the hospital.

There are two types of people in this world: The kind who suffer horribly yet emerge more humane, more compassionate, and those who suffer horribly and turn into a monster. Your 'best friend' has chosen the second path, sad to say.

By the way, the e-mail Hartwell wrote about, that Don sent her with regard to people dying in funny ways, I sent him. It was the Darwin Awards, and yes it is black humor. He in turn sent it to everyone on his list; I know because it came bouncing right back at me. There was no sinister intent. He was not threatening her royal highness Hartwell, who sees herself in the central position to the exclusion of all others.

I cannot believe this woman has created such an evil vortex around herself. She lives inside a cesspool of her own making. She spits poison like a cornered viper.

I'm sorry for her. And since you call her your friend, I'm sorry for you. Even so, she needs you, along with some sort of honest shrink, so go with my best wishes into the Hartwellian black night. I don't think for a New York minute you realize what you're mixed up with; I honestly don't. She is a mess. Yes, yes, MK Ultra would make anyone a mess. But that gives her no license to ruin the lives of others, innocents, dear and decent people.

To address her further at [site name removed] is to incite a heckler. It's what she reminds me of. Worse. Far worse.

Marilyn A. Guinnane
Writer (do a search at"


My (now deceased) father served in military intelligence (G-2), as a translator (he spoke 7 languages) and cryptographer. He was later recruited into CIA. He used to tell me, "Always remember one thing." (in intelligence work, or any area of life) "There's no substitute for stupidity". 

Over the years, my father's astute comment has come to mind many times, especially on occasions such as this.

Marilyn Guinanne is not only shamelessly ignorant and ill-informed about the topics on which she shoots off her mouth (including CIA; intelligence operations; MK Ultra; 9-11; feminism; the Libertarian party.....) and on which she claims to be a "Writer", she's downright stupid.

Indeed, her greatest talent appears to be a merciless butchering of the English language with her prodigal and redundant use of tortured cliches and mixed metaphors --as a poor substitute for facts and accurate, relevant information-- which could surely induce cognitive agony even in the functionally illiterate.

But Ms. Guinnane's lack of writing skills or low intelligence quotient are hardly the issues. 

Since she has taken it upon herself to be a loud and aggressive mouthpiece for the alleged "heroism" of the CIA disinfo set, their minions and mind-controlled robots, she will have to learn the hard way that she is way out of her league; particularly when making a frontal assault on seasoned professionals who have actually WORKED for intelligence and law enforcement agencies and have first-hand knowledge and extensive training in intelligence work.

People who KNOW what they are talking about and who can back up their allegations with hard evidence. Hardworking, dedicated people who have done many years of their own investigations and research. People unlike Ms. Guinnane: A rank amateur who is merely parroting what she has heard or read on some conspiracy message board; in some self-published "biography"; or other venue of government-sponsored, controlled-opposition disinfo.

Ms. Guinnane first presumes to speak with authority on subjects she knows nothing about by parroting what she's been brainwashed to believe by folks such as Don Stacey, Susan Ford et al. She then proceeds to hurl insults and invective at people she does not know, such as Barbara Hartwell and Geral Sosbee. People about whom she knows absolutely nothing that is real or true.

But how very typical of the uneducated and the misinformed. I've seen her kind before. Ms. Guinnane is an attention-and-approval seeker whose dearth of knowledge is surpassed only by her delusions of herself as some sort of real "player" in the world of international politics. But I can assure her she's playing a fool's game against people a hell of a lot smarter than she is.


Time to take look at some of Ms. Guinnane's wild allegations; outlandish accusations and uninformed speculation and refute them with hard facts.

Guinnane's comments are in quotes.

[My comments are in brackets, preceded by my initials, BH]

MG: "Look, break down her story: Why on God's earth would an investment banker suddenly affiliate himself with the CIA? Why would a seventy year old man start an investment banking firm that is a CIA 'front'? It's completely nuts."

[BH: That's a great idea. Let's "break down the story". But to break down a story you have to deal with FACTS, not erroneous suppositions or paranoid fantasies. Ms. Guinnane is clearly unaware of the fact that CIA routinely operates through various and sundry front companies.

An international investment banking firm provides great cover and in fact many CIA operatives are investment bankers, just as some are journalists; "diplomats" ; or those in "foreign service" positions, known as "official cover" . Others, such as myself were utilized under "non-official cover" better known as NOC.

Stonebridge Associates, the company mentioned in my article [EXPOSED: CIA MKULTRA CONTAINMENT OP] was NOT started by "a seventy year old man". Mr. Stacey started the enterprise in 1986, according to his bio.

When I first heard from Mr. Stacey in 1998, he claimed to be sixty-two (62). If Stacey was 62 in '98 he would NOW be either 68 or 69, depending on what month he was born. In 1986, when he started the company he would have been around 51.

And there was nothing "sudden" about Mr. Stacey's affiliation with CIA. No, that would have been going on for years, at least as far back as 1986, since Stonebridge Associates has been functioning as a CIA cut out since that time. Yes, somebody appears to be "nuts"...but it's not myself, nor is it CIA.]

MG: "Let me tell you of the absolute heroes I know of, fighting NWO tooth and nail and at great personal jeopardy: John Kaminski. His essays are read world-wide, and he is brilliant. Here's what Hartwell calls him: "A neo-Bolshevik." Well, that's cute, Babs, but when did you do much of anything but spew vitriol?"

[BH: Real heroes! I called Kaminski a Neo-Bolshevik because that is precisely what he is. He supports a globalist, collectivist, left-wing agenda, straight out of the Communist Manifesto. And otherwise just whines about how hopeless and despairing his own life and the world at large has become. And don't call me "Babs", you impudent bimbo, that's reserved for my family and friends.]

"Another great hero: Sue Ford. She endured MK Ultra, as well..... She wrote Thanks for the Memories, self-published, and deserves a medal for singing like a canary. Hartwell lives in some kind of Loopy Land of the mind, whereupon she fantacizes all kinds of damaging-to-others crap that does not happen. Then she reports it as truth, and the likes of Geral Sosbee buy it, hook/line. Well, as P.T. Barnum said . . . "There's a . . . " ah, but you know the quote. After all, it applies."

[BH: Thanks for the Memories, I'm sorry to have to say, would have been more appropriately titled: Blowjobs in the White House. Read the book, cover to cover. How many times, under how many circumstances, does Sue Ford write about this particular sex act, ad nauseum, naming all the names of the politicians, entertainers and U.S. presidents with whom she engaged in fornication as a "sex slave".

It's disgusting. Do we really need to be subjected to this? Aside from the lurid sex scandals described in the book (which I'm sure made it a hot item and best-seller on the conspiracy circuit) what was the point? And as far as containing accurate historical information on MK Ultra? Sorry, but it just didn't happen, not in this book.

In truth, most of the projects under the umbrella of MK Ultra had nothing whatsoever to do with using people as "sex slaves". The REAL black operations, for which certain intelligence operatives (including myself) were originally trained under MK Ultra during the cold war era, had to do with "creating the perfect spy"; or Manchurian Candidate military assassins.

And here's another thing which I could hardly consider "heroic". Sue Ford, in one of her speeches at the Global Sciences Congress in Daytona Beach, Fla. 1998, claimed that: "Any survivor of MK Ultra who claims they did NOT abuse their own children is NOT a REAL survivor."

Well, I have news for Sue Ford and her handlers: I am a "real" survivor of MK Ultra. I was never a "sex slave" nor was I ever sexually abused by anyone, including anyone from CIA. As I've said before, I would have killed any man or woman who attempted to sexually abuse me. And I sure as hell never "abused" ANY child, certainly not my own son!

And in case the credulous fool, Marilyn Guinnane, is about to cry "liar!" or "viper!" again, I suggest she get one of the original copies of the videotape called Mind Control Goes Public, being sold all over the Internet, in which this horribly false statement by Sue Ford is memorialized. I have it on tape, and I heard it with my own ears, sitting in the front row at the conference, in Daytona Beach Florida. It made me sick to my stomach.

To make such an outrageous claim is irresponsible and unconscionable. To attempt to drag all other survivors of government mind control operations down to this level, just because SHE was guilty of abusing her own daughter is the least "heroic" act I can imagine.

It's not surprising her daughter is in a mental ward. Even worse, such a statement provides cover for any abuser: "They couldn't help it, they were under mind control!"... Bullshit. Mind control can only work with what's there inside an individual to begin with.

Yes, some people may be submissive by nature, and can be made into sex slaves. Some may have it "in them" that they could abuse a child, including their own. But in my own case, I kicked ass up and down several states, including New York, Connecticut and Massachusetts to PREVENT any sort of abuses to my child from any of the government bastards who would have loved to get their grimy hands on him.

Considering the family I was raised in, a combination bootcamp/charm school, I also trained my own son in self-defense, martial arts and basic intelligence work so he could take good care of himself, should the need arise.

As for the "heroism" of Don Stacey? Read my article on the CIA MK Ultra Containment Op. If you still think he's a hero, you can join the "resistance" movement with Ms. Guinnane. But better first to bend over and kiss your ass goodbye]

MG: "She needs.... some sort of honest shrink, She [Barbara Hartwell] is a mess. Yes, yes, MK Ultra would make anyone a mess. But that gives her no license to ruin the lives of others, innocents, dear and decent people. "

[BH: First of all, this stupid, presumptuous, meddling bitch knows nothing about MK Ultra or about what I "need". I don't need a "shrink" and I'm far from being a "mess". I broke out of MK Ultra and escaped from CIA's black ops by the grace of God, over ten years ago.

If this pathetic creature thinks she can impugn my sanity by such gratuitous libel, she'd better think again, and listen up while the listening's good, because before I'm through with her she'll be singing a different tune.

Secondly, she's got it all very, very wrong. On the contrary, the "innocent" and "dear and decent people" to whom she refers, namely Don Stacey and Sue Ford, have attempted to ruin MY life with their lies and manipulation. Fortunately for me, they did not succeed. My association with both of them, and the unscrupulous crowd they hang out with, was short lived. I saw through them and cut them off before they could do any serious damage.

But let's talk about OUTRAGE, shall we? I'm mad as hell about having been targeted for character assassination by halfwits such as Marilyn Guinnane and other government stooges who are wittingly or unwittingly doing the dirty work of the government-sponsored slimebags they worship as "heroes".

Some of us know the real secrets of CIA's deep black projects, mind control horrors which have never seen the light of day or public exposure . Here's a hint: It's not about "sex slaves".

Truly, there's no substitute for stupidity.

Barbara Hartwell
May 25, 2004