Howard Nemaizer & “Truth Talk News”: Unscrupulous Assault on Truth (2)

PART TWO: Nemaizer's Dishonest Plots, Plans & Set-ups

In December, 2012, I was co-hosting a radio program with Dr. Antonella Carpenter, The Medical Conspiracy, on Orion Talk Radio network. Much of what we covered on the program concerned COINTELPRO. Dr. Carpenter had been targeted for a neutralization campaign by the Medical Mafia and Big Pharma, so there were a series of programs on counterintelligence tactics, one of the areas of my expertise.

Dr. Carpenter (like Barbara Hartwell, former FBI agent Geral Sosbee, and a number of others I have known), has suffered outrageous injustices, harassment and persecution, which eventually drove her into financial destitution and homelessness. Her property was stolen or destroyed by the feds. Her business was raided by the FDA, and thus shut down; she was later arrested, and finally wrongfully indicted on false charges. A horrible travesty of justice against a brilliant doctor whose “crime” (according to the FDA and DOJ) was saving lives of cancer patients. Dr. Carpenter had previously been persecuted as a whistleblower while working in the Defense Industry.

This kind of nightmare is what often happens to government whistleblowers. Your life will be destroyed, piece by piece. You will lose most everything you own You will be slandered/libeled and falsely accused. Unjust and baseless rumors will fly. You will be blacklisted, personally and professionally. Your relationships with family, friends and colleagues will most likely be ruined, by abandonment and/or betrayal, due to pressure applied and/or threats by the perps, who in these cases are are government agents.

Having no resources myself, there was not much I could do to support other whistleblowers, targeted as I was. The one thing I was capable of doing was to help Dr. Carpenter publicize her case, in attempts to raise public awareness of her plight, and of what is actually at stake, not only for the individual whistleblower, but for the larger issues of human rights and Constitutional protections of those rights, including freedom to choose one's own health care.

I give this brief background summary to provide context for some of the issues covered in this report.

During that time, I had also been an occasional guest on other radio programs, as time permitted, one of which was Howard Nema's (aka Nemaizer) “Truth Talk News”, on which I discussed various subjects, including COINTELPRO. “Truth Talk News” (as I later discovered, a misnomer) was broadcast on “Truth Broadcast Network” (another misnomer), owned by Harry Link.

In December of 2012, an issue came up which involved Fritz Springmeier, a very well-known person claiming to be an expert on CIA MK Ultra. Earlier that year, Howard Nemaizer had requested that I provide him with some information about Springmeier. I e-mailed him some documentation, along with a summary of my considered professional opinion, having conducted investigations on Springmeier and some of his associates, going back to the 1990s.

Nemaizer had previously interviewed Springmeier on his TV show, believing him to be legitimate. But now, he said he was interested in anything which would give him another perspective as to Springmeier's credibility. I told him (as I would tell anyone who asked) that he could not develop an informed opinion or reach a reasonable conclusion unless he did his own research, that I could only suggest some areas he could look into.

I received some e-mails from Nemaizer, in which he stated that he had a “plan” to “expose” Springmeier by inviting him on a program, co-hosted by Harry Link and another of his associates, Vincent Blasone. The “plan” involved using a pretense of supporting Springmeir, and then setting him up to later be “exposed”.

The e-mail exchanges that follow are mostly self-explanatory. I have removed any irrelevant and/or personal information, as well as certain names, to protect privacy. But, as will become clear, the issues themselves were (and are) very public.

Hartwell to Nemaizer:

Got both messages re Springmeier. I've told you what I know about him, and some months ago, sent you some documentation from other sources.

In my opinion, he is a charlatan and a phony Christian, as well as a MC handler. I've exposed some info on Monarch on my website and have probably told you more, can't remember what precisely.

I would not want to be involved in anything re Springmeier myself and don't have anything to say re Harry or Vinny, it's not my business.

I don't want my name to be brought into this, but I can't stop others if that is what they choose to do. My policy is, if someone else brings up my name publicly (say, Harry or Vinny) I would then probably address it in a report to set the record straight, and the same, should "the enemy" (Springmeier) say anything.

All I would ask, should YOU decide to interview him, is that my name not be brought up on the air, nor discussed with him off the air. I am asking this as a friend.

I have no interest in any kind of "debate" on these issues. My policy is to expose the liars and shills, not engage them.

Nemaizer to BH:

"Fritz clearly has an agenda. I'd like to know what it is. I know he was working on a new book when Vinny invited him on several months ago. Incidentally he has posted very positive things about us on his Facebook page including us as one of his favorite shows he's been on since his "return".

I know Harry would like to hit him with some tough questions. Of course, I would never bring you up, Barbara, neither would Vinny -- and if you were brought up by F.S. I would defend you to the end.

I must say, I am intrigued. I spoke with Vinny and we both would like to see where this goes. Very odd. We would like to feel him out then question him about Alex Jones cointelpro. We know if we hit certain things like Cisco Wheeler and plagarism he will walk and that would be that. Looking to give him enough rope to hang himself. Not looking for an abush, or a love fest. I would like to milk this into 2 even 3 interviews before we hit him with the really tough questions and then when we've "used" him enough we can ask the really tough questions and expose the truth about Cisco Wheeler, plagarism and his associations with cointelpro shills like AJ. What are your thoughts about our plan?"

BH to Nemaizer:

No e-mail in response to this. I simply repeated (as I had told him before) that I considered his “plan” to be dishonest, and wanted no part of it. It had nothing to do with me. He seemed to believe (falsely) that I was somehow involved, which is apparently why he kept asking for my opinion.

I also told him I did not want anyone “defending” me. I only wanted my name to be LEFT OUT of any of his dealings with Springmeier, including this dishonest plot. And in this case, Nemaizer was not qualified to “defend” me, since he lacked the knowledge and experience to know what he was talking about.

Note that Nemaizer talks of “using” Springmeir to extract information. No honest exchange of ideas, not even a straightforward discussion, allowing the so-called “tough” questions to be asked and answered. This is very telling as to Nemaizer's character. Don't be honest. “Use” people for what you can “get”, and then spring a trap after you have misrepresented your intentions, insincerely, on false pretenses.

(Which, as it turned out, is exactly what Howard Nemaizer later did to me, with his false pretenses and promises of “sanctuary”, placing me in a horrible position, even endangering my safety, which resulted only in more extreme stress, losses and damages from Nemaizer's lies. I should have seen it coming....)

So, Nemaizer went ahead, along with Harry Link and Vincent Blasone, and did the interview with Springmeir. When I watched this interview, it became clear to me that the hosts had no intention of doing anything but promoting Springmeier with entirely favorable comments, sympathetic responses to anything he said, treating him with great deference, kow-towing and toadying to him, as if he were a heroic figure, who had earned their admiration and respect.

There are two ways to view this: 1) They were sincere in their expressions of “support” for Springmeier, despite their claim that their “plan” was to set him up. Which would probably mean that they were operating out of profound ignorance. 2) They were insincere, laying on the phony praise. Either way, it shows dishonesty, rather than a search for the truth.

Frankly, it made me sick. I believe in honesty, no matter the circumstances, not manipulation and set ups. Do that, and you might as well be working for the government.

But they never did “expose” him. The show ended with accolades for Springmeir from the three toadies. There was also a huge promotion of Springneier's books, in large banner ads. Nobody watching this show could ever get the impression that the three hosts were anything but advocates and supporters of Fritz Springmeier, “True Believers” in all he was selling.

But here's the issue for me: What Springmeier claims to be true, and in fact what he has succeeded, over a period of years, in persuading large numbers of people to believe, goes against what I KNOW to be true, personally and professionally, from both direct experience and extensive investigations, and actually misinforms his large audiences, most of whom are probably sincerely seeking the truth.

Like other charlatans selling “Monarch”, never a CIA operation under MK Ultra, but a sideshow to misdirect attention from the actual operations, Springmeier has made money off the sale of his books and tapes, cashing in on the misery of innocent victims of the government's abuses of human rights.

What about the people whose children have been horrifically abused and exploited in government mind control programs? What about genuine, sincere Christians, seeking the truth about these demonic government operations? Springmeier touts himself as a Christian minister. Again, it makes me sick.

As I can attest from personal experience, MK Ultra is hell on earth, a nightmare from which you cannot easily awaken. The damages are extreme and severe, and in almost all cases, permanent, even if one manages to recover some semblance of a "normal" life. I was only delivered by the grace of God, with my sanity and principles intact. (Thank You, Jesus!) Most are not as fortunate. 

I told Dr. Carpenter about the Fritz Springmeier debacle, and about how I could no longer in good conscience promote anything from Howard Nema (aka Nemaizer), not his show, nor “Truth Broadcast Network” where his show aired. We decided to comment on this on Dr. Carpenter's program, which aired the evening after the Springmeier interview.

Harry Link was also promoting Alex Jones. Alex Jones, the notorious government shill, who had done damage to both Barbara Hartwell and Dr. Carpenter (as well as many others), with his censorship and sabotage of our legitimate exposure of information.

Here, an excerpt from a report (2012):

….Howard Nema had co-hosted a program on TRUTH TALK NEWS with Vincent Blasone and Harry Link, an interview with Fritz Springmeier, on December 10, 2012. Springmeier was shortly thereafter heavily promoted by Harry Link on Truth Broadcast Network, including a large banner which exclaimed: SPRINGMEIER IS BACK!!! Additionally, there were large advertisements encouraging the public to buy Springmeier's books.

Considering the fact that I had thoroughly investigated Fritz Springmeier since the mid-1990s and long ago reached several conclusions, based on facts and material evidence, that Springmeier (among other things) is a charlatan, a false Christian, a mind control handler and a criminal whose books, articles and radio/video presentations are filled with disinformation about a number of subjects, most notably government mind control operations.

Some time back, in the Spring of 2012, Howard had asked for my opinion on Springmeier, whom he had interviewed on his program a few times; these interviews took place before Howard and I were acquainted. In response to his request, I sent Howard some documentation. And I made it very clear in several telephone conversations what I thought of Springmeier and some of his associates, who promote the "Monarch" project as a CIA operation under MK Ultra, when in fact it was not.

It is important to state that my knowledge of these issues is based on my professional background, my extensive personal experience and many years of research and investigations, as well as my expertise on counterintelligence operations.

So frankly, I was outraged when I watched the Springmeier interview on TRUTH TALK NEWS, in which he was touted as a "political prisoner" (in fact, he did prison time for bank robbery), and "mind control expert" (those who consider "Monarch" to be a CIA operation, out of ignorance, or for an agenda, might agree, but that does not change the facts.)

Shortly thereafter, I decided that I could not allow this promotion of Springmeier to go unchallenged, so I did a show with Dr. Carpenter (The Medical Conspiracy), on which we exposed the facts about Fritz Springmeier (aka Victor E. Schoff aka Arthur Alexander Jr. --and yes, I've seen the forged I.D.s in both those names, of which I may still have copies in my files, and if I find them, will publish them as evidence.)

I also, as a matter of principle, removed the links on my website for TRUTH TALK NEWS and Truth Broadcast Network. As I explained on the air, I refuse to promote any network or individual who is promoting liars, charlatans, disinformation specialists, government shills, criminals or other wrongdoers. That is my policy and not subject to compromise.

Before the Springmeier interview on December 10, Howard had told me he wanted to "expose" Springmeier on the air, after a series of interviews, and asked me what I thought about that. What I told him was that this would not be my way of dealing with anyone; that I do not condone such a "set up"; and that lastly, I did not want my name connected to any of this, nor mentioned on the air, nor used as a "source", should he choose to go through with this plan, which I considered unwise.

Aside from this, there were others involved, namely Harry Link and Vinny Blasone (who unlike Howard, were not my associates or friends). I explained that I did not want to get in the middle of any of this, and wanted no involvement whatsoever. And though I refused to give advice on this matter, when asked, I told Howard the truth about what I thought: that this would backfire and in the process compromise his own credibility.

As it turned out, the consequences I had predicted came to pass. Howard later told me that I was "right about everything" (including Springmeier and Laibow) and after much consideration, made a decision to sever his ties with Truth Broadcast Network.

End of excerpt.

Now, here is what happened next, which I did not cover publicly, but which I find it necessary to address now, considering the circumstances, being that Howard Nemaizer has added insult to injury by his libelous falsehoods against Barbara Hartwell.

He took offense when I addressed the issue of the promotion on “Truth Talk News” of the charlatan Fritz Springmeier, on Dr. Carpenter's radio program.

It was none of Nemaizer's business how I chose to conduct my own professional work, which had nothing whatsoever to do with him, but he clearly had the false notion that he had a “say”, given that he seemed to believe that there was some “team effort” underway.

Shortly after Dr. Carpenter's program aired, I received a series of irate phone calls from Howard Nemaizer. He left messages which were extremely disrespectful, in attempts to pressure me to call him back. I regarded these calls as harassment, and did not respond.

He even threatened, in one such message, that he would set up an interview with Fritz Springmeier, and would confront him with the accusations from “my source, Barbara Hartwell.” This statement was made in a very aggressive, even nasty, tone of voice.

This intrusive, disrespectful behavior should have been the red flag that alerted me to the true character of Howard Nemaizer. It was the behavior of an aggressive busybody, trying to horn in on my business, entirely lacking respect for my personal boundaries.

I should have cut off communications with him then and there, but decided that I would give him the benefit of the doubt, by giving him the opportunity to see the error of his ways. As later became clear, it was a mistake, one that I have paid for many times over.

I decided to e-mail Nemaizer, if only to set the record straight, and to once again clearly state my position.

I got the following e-mail in response.

Nemaizer to Hartwell:

"I understand your position, however, I agreed not to mention your name on air with FS so I am a bit confused as to why you undermined my plan and blocked me on skype? I told you exactly what we would do."

Hartwell to Nemaizer:

First of all, I did not block you on skype. I was on another call, and had no time as I was busy with something else, and I don't use skype for personal messages, there is no privacy at all. You had asked me to call, and I would have, as soon as I found time.

I don't ever use my cell phone, so I keep it turned off. I have asked people who have the number not to call me on the cell, unless in a case of emergency. It was only when I turned it on to charge it that I got your messages this morning.

I was accused of dodging your phone calls. Not true. And to try to pressure me to call is not something I would respond to.

I did not "undermine" anything, and I'm sorry you would interpret it that way.

Yes, you had told me about this plan re Springmeier. But please remember, I was not involved in it in any way. In fact, I told you I refused to be involved, because I do not condone or participate in "set ups" of that nature, that is not the way I do things. I am always direct and blunt, that is how I deal with everything and everyone.

It was not my place to tell you what to do, nor to give unsolicited advice, and there were other people involved, namely Harry Link and Vinny. They are not my friends, nor even my associates, and I don't interfere in other people's business, that is my policy. I did not think this plan was wise, and when you asked for my thoughts, I tried to tell you it was dishonest and risky, but you chose to go through with it, and that is your right.

I had simply asked you, as a friend, not to discuss me with Springmeier again, nor to allow my name to be part of any discussion on air. As I told you, I want NO INVOLVEMENT in any way with Springmeier or anything connected to him, and that is my prerogative.

Springmeier to me is the enemy, and I made that clear to you from way back. I do not directly engage my enemies (unless in extreme circumstances where I am being attacked physically or verbally), and I ask my friends to please respect my wishes in not discussing me with them, and that is all I asked.

I operate independently, always have, always will. I am not a team player. No one has any say in my decisions except me and I don't allow myself to be influenced by any consensus of others.

I have been exposing FS for many years, and investigating him for almost 2 decades. I know what I'm talking about, and I have the documentation. If someone chooses to take my word for it, they are free to believe me, or not. I have been repeatedly attacked by Springmeier's cronies and supporters, and his disinfo has greatly damaged me and my family in many ways. For me, this is not only professional, but personal.

So, no one has the right to expect that I will have a "gag order" on me, or expect that I will suddenly cease in my work of exposing criminals/shills/liars, simply because exposing the truth (as I always do) might be inconvenient with someone else's "plan" --one that has nothing to do with me.

When I saw the show with FS, in which it appeared that all of you were extremely supportive of him, I knew that I could not in good conscience allow this to go unchallenged. Whatever your plan was, you still were, in all ways apparent, promoting and supporting Springmeier. And that disinfo was going out over the airwaves to anyone watching, who might well believe it to be true.

Then I saw the big banner ads, promoting FS and the sale of his books. Yes, I know Harry Link runs TBN, but I knew I could not be associated with any network that promotes FS, along with Alex Jones. I had no way of knowing if you were involved, or not. You had not contacted me during all this time, so I had to go by the evidence which was right before my eyes.

So I removed the links to the sites, since I was not going to be involved in promoting anyone who promotes Springmeier or Jones.

During the show, Randy said he received a message from you, stating "Barbara jumped the gun". No, I did not, as I was never INVOLVED in your plan re Springmeier, and I have the right to comment publicly on something that has been made public (your show with FS, and the banner ads and big promotions of FS's books, etc.)

You may not understand this, but any promotion of FS not only does not serve the truth, but damages those like me who are telling the truth about MK Ultra and other related issues. You don't know a fraction of what has gone on, or what I have been through, because I have not made it public (for my own reasons), and have only told you a small part, in confidence.

Re the Dec 21 show. I heard it advertised by you only a few days ago, and there was a notice promoting it, but I never received a call from you to let me know if it was still on. I had already decided not to be on the show, due to the Springmeier debacle, and had you called me, I would have told you that, but since I never heard from you, I just let it go.

Lastly there is the issue that you said in your phone message that you would be using my name as a "source" re Springmeier? And make a video with him? And making assumptions (untrue) that this was what I wanted?

Not at all. My original request to you is that you not use my name in any way, shape or form, in connection with Springmeier. That request stands. If you want to expose him, as you say, then please do it on your own, not involving me.

I do not want my friendship with you to end, regarding something like this. I would be happy to discuss it with you, but I have no free time today, or tomorrow, not until after Christmas. I have some very serious problems of my own to deal with, plus I have not been well.

And I hope you understand my position on this. If you want to sever ties with TBN, then that is your choice. Again, it's not my business, that is between you and Harry Link. But in any case, I don't want any involvement with his network, because he has shown his true colors, and I can't condone nor support what he is doing. So I would ask you to please remove any references to me, or my previous reports you posted on the site, that is, if they have not already been removed by Harry.

Howard Nemaizer's response:

"First off, I way overreacted and I am very sorry. I do sincerely apologize for all the misunderstandings on my part regarding last night's show. Thank you for the clarifications.

I would never want anything to come between our friendship and mutual respect. I must say, this has been eating at me.

In retrospect, you were right all along regarding FS and I should have listened to your advice not to proceed the way we did. But I will make amends.

That said, Harry has pulled AJ off the network (which is still under renovation) and we had a long discussion about the direction of TBN and my place in it. I understand your feelings toward Harry and TBN and realize the way we cat and moused the FS interview and Harry's actions could have a damaging effect on my own reputation.

That said, I will be absolutely direct in my actions in the future. Straight as an arrow, like you. I will expose FS in the future by asking him the tough questions we were hoping would be asked by callers.

Of course I will be doing this on my own, but I would appreciate any info you can send me regarding him so I can be prepared.

I am also sorry since I am aware how devastating this FS debacle was to you, due to your own MK Ultra past and the lies about monarch, etc

My hope is that you will consider supporting my work on the www.livestream.com/truthtalknews for I will always support you, your work and your reputation. I am hopeful we can move forward and continue our efforts working on projects together in the future."

So, Nemaizer apologized to me and acknowledged that he was in the wrong. But was his apology sincere? Looking back on it, I don't believe so. Note that he tries to shift blame onto Harry Link, when he was a full and willing participant in the “plan”. He says he is concerned about his own reputation being damaged, but did he ever consider the damage to me, had MY NAME been dragged into his foolishness?

Also, note that he states:

"That said, I will be absolutely direct in my actions in the future. Straight as an arrow, like you. I will expose FS in the future by asking him the tough questions we were hoping would be asked by callers."

Howard Nemaizer had always told me he admired me for my honesty. I had even heard him talking about me on his program, stating, “Barbara Hartwell is the most honest person I know.”

But like others (former friends) I have known, he clearly does not like it when my “straight arrow” honesty and bluntness becomes too hot to handle, when HE is confronted for his dishonest behavior, or when I state the truth and the facts, even when they may “offend” someone.

Since that time, he has publicly accused me of being a “liar” and a “con artist”, even a “sociopath”, simply because he refuses to admit his own wrongdoing. He lacks integrity, and rather than make a REAL effort at honesty, tries to twist things around to blame me for his own unethical behavior. For that kind of crap, I have a ZERO TOLERANCE policy.

He then states:

"I am hopeful we can move forward and continue our efforts working on projects together in the future."

In fact, I had never worked on any “projects” with Howard Nemaizer. I had only been an occasional guest on his radio program. Again, he seems to believe that there was some “team effort”, where none existed, at least not involving me.

Shortly after I received this e-mail, I got another. The subject header stated: “Important NEW information”.

The e-mail was about another charlatan, one Rima Laibow. This referred to Laibow, the liar, and her hoax, who stated in a widely promoted video, “I am Adam Lanza's doctor.” As I stated in a report: Bullshit!

Nemaizer jumped on this, believing it was true, as did Harry Link. They actually set up an interview with Rima Laibow, on “Truth Talk News”, which they heavily promoted. But after I apprised Nemaizer that Laibow is a liar and a government shill, married to General Albert Stubblebine, a perpetrator of massive crimes against persons, including mind control programs, as well as horrific abuse of animals, Nemaizer cancelled the interview.

Here is my response to Nemaizer's e-mail about “Important NEW Information”:

You asked me what I think about this? I'll be blunt, as always, so I hope you understand.

There is no "new" information here. This woman is a demon, and so is her husband, Stubblebine (both listed in my HALL OF SHAME), who have both been heavily involved in MK Ultra, psy ops and behavior modification for years.

I know all about them, and none of it is good.

Their "natural solutions" are phony. I've already seen these videos (Alex Jones interview, 2009), and the new one is nothing but a psy op. I have no reason to believe this woman was Adam Lanza's doctor, in my opinion that is a lie. Anyone with any discernment, watching this, will know that and will know who and what she is. But sadly, most people will not see that and will believe the lies.

They pretend to be against drugs? Nothing could be further from the truth!

I looked on Truth Broadcast Network and saw the big promotions for the Rima Laibow interview on TRUTH TALK NEWS, presented AS IF this were "truth".

Meanwhile, people reading this may believe this is "real" when it is not. Just like the Fritz Springmeier promotions.

I must say, I don't understand why you would choose to do this, even if your plan is to "expose" her. Again a false paradigm is being set up, which people reading TBN could well believe, attributing credibility where it is not merited. And will compromise your credibility, in my opinion.

But as always, that is your right, if that is what you and Harry Link have decided.

But again, please do remove all references to my name, including on the scrolling banner of the TV show. I do not want my name connected to any of this, and re your show, not until such time (if ever) that you and I see eye to eye on these matters.

This is not anything to do with our friendship, it is solely professional and on principle, so please take this in the way it is intended.

End of excerpt from e-mail.

Following this, more e-mails from Nemaizer, asking questions, for my opinions, for advice, etc. Now, talking about how HE was going to “EXPOSE” Rima Laibow. I was getting very tired of all this, and my patience was wearing thin, considering that my own circumstances were growing worse by the day.

So I sent this e-mail to Howard Nemaizer:

First I should say that my situation is so bad that most of my time is spent just trying to survive. I am flat broke with no money for even the most basic necessities, and am in pain with no way to get relief. I don't have the option of medical care, as I can't even afford to buy food. Other people are ill? Most can get help, where I cannot.

To add to this nightmare, I am currently snowed in and my car has been blocked in by a wall of snow, I haven't been able to get out for days, have no money to hire a plow and have not been able to get any help. Sorry, but I am not in any shape to get into heavy discussions on all this, not at this time.

The only thing I can tell you is that you have chosen a path which I cannot condone and do not agree with. But I can't advise you, as our viewpoints are so far apart I don't see any common ground. I don't allow myself to get into conflicts or arguments with people, it is too stressful and I don't try to impose my views on others.

But I can give you a few ideas to consider, which you can take or leave.

In my opinion, you have aligned yourself with a person, namely Harry Link, who does not hold the principles to defend truth, no matter the consequences, but will exploit anything in order to draw publicity for his own agenda.

Frankly, I don't have any respect for him, and have now seen enough to know that I want no dealings with him and no association with his network.

How can someone promote such obvious disinformation and claim he is all about truth?

As far as exposing the bad guys, my way is to do a thorough investigation and present my findings in a report, and/or on the air. An investigation takes time, so if you are rushing in attempts to "expose" someone, you won't have enough solid information or facts to make a valid case.

Speaking for myself, I do not engage the bad guys directly, nor do I play any kind of games, such as presenting false information in order to lure someone into a trap.

If you really believe you must confront them directly on the air in order to expose them, then I can't advise you. However, presenting disinformation ahead of time, as part of this set up, is not something I believe in. That is a compromise of the truth, and can only as a result compromise the credibility of the person engaging in such tactics.

This is 'the ends justify the means' philosophy and it does not serve truth.

The way I see it, there is only one weapon to be used against the bad guys: UNADULTERATED TRUTH. Without that, you are fighting a battle you can never win. To quote Sun Tzu (Art of War): Know the enemy and know yourself.

First, I would free myself from any alliances where you do not have complete sovereignty, where you don't have to change your ideas or compromise your principles in order to work with anyone else.

That is what I have done, a long time ago, and it is the only thing that has ever worked for me. When you have to constantly confer or argue with someone who does not serve truth, or you are "at the mercy" of someone because you are dependent upon them in any way, it drains your energy, warps your priorities and stops you from standing up for the right thing and ultimately, defending TRUTH.

But that is me, and my way.

I truly hope you will find a way that works for you, but I believe you will have to find it on your own, through some direct revelation, not from the advice of others, including me.

Lastly, ask yourself: What would Jesus do? Would He promote disinformation, even for a minute, in order to "expose" the enemy? Or would He call out the enemy and admonish them for their lies, and their demonic behavior?

You are my friend, Howard, and I don't want that to change. I can't support some of what you are involved in, but know that I still support YOU, as my friend and Brother in Christ. But I have told you all I can for the time being, so please take it for what it is worth.

 

[Note: I later learned that Howard Nemaizer was in fact NOT my "brother in Christ" and never had been. As for being a "friend", his totally unscrupulous, self-serving  behavior revealed that to be a falsehood also.]

End of excerpt from e-mail.

The evidence presented here shows that I gave Howard Nemaizer every opportunity to understand my position on various issues. I also told him the truth, whenever he asked for my opinion. I repeatedly gave him the benefit of the doubt, and accepted his apologies for his indiscretions, believing them (at the time) to be sincere.

But what Howard Nemaizer eventually revealed to me, through his words and actions, is that he is fueled by self-serving personal ambition, rather then by the desire to do the right thing, to serve the truth, no matter the consequences.

It also became clear to me that he did not even seem to “hear” what I was actually saying, on any number of occasions, which was always based on principle. Instead of considering principle, he interpreted everything through pragmatism, by how it would serve HIM and HIS interests, HIS agenda, which it became clear was to make a name for himself, to seek public attention and approval, when he did not have the knowledge or experience as a basis for such an achievement. He thought he could ride my coattails to gratify his ego and glorify himself at my expense.

Instead of showing a willingness to learn, from others who DO have the knowledge, the hard-won personal/professional experience and expertise, and who hold the necessary principles to serve truth, he bulldozed ahead, scavenging from the legitimate work of others, trying to make himself APPEAR to be an authority or expert on issues, where in fact he so obviously lacks understanding that he only exposes himself as a pretentious fool.

I left off in the last report with Howard Nemaizer's phony comment to me in his latest public smear piece:

"If you truly are a sovereign child of God, Barbara and not a CIA disinformation agent, do what Jesus would do. Turn the other cheek as I am going to do–and get on with your life."

Now. This statement shows the true arrogance of Howard Nemaizer. He “copies” my sincere statement to him:

"Lastly, ask yourself: What would Jesus do? Would He promote disinformation, even for a minute, in order to "expose" the enemy? Or would He call out the enemy and admonish them for their lies, and their demonic behavior?"

Now, I have this to say to Howard Nemaizer:

How dare you, you aggressive, obnoxious, self-serving little punk!

Nemaizer accuses me of being a “CIA disinformation agent”, when he knows damn well this is untrue. No, he tries (as usual) to twist things around and blame me for his own dishonesty, aggression and the outright idiocy of some of his promotions, when all this started simply because I exercised my RIGHT to protest his misrepresentation and exploitation of MY NAME and website for his own unscrupulous ends.

Which he continued to do, even after I publicly demanded that he REMOVE the false and fraudulent information and notices in connection with my name. To this day, no public apology. No public retractions of his fraudulent promotions, going on for more than two years, as the damages continue to mount to my good name. Only more lies, more character assassination. More monstrous invasions of my privacy and now, even that of my family, who are not involved in any way.

If Howard Nemaizer is really so blind and/or so stupid as to think I will allow him to get away with the arrogant, dishonest, and utterly despicable offenses he has committed against a person who has never once done anything wrongful to him, he will be hit right between the eyes with the true meaning of “straight arrow” honesty, in word and deed.

Barbara Hartwell Percival

Stating the Truth in Good Faith for the Public Record

December 26, 2015

Barbara Hartwell Percival
Legal Defense & Research Trust
PO Box 22
Rhinebeck, NY 12572
Barbara Hartwell Vs. CIA
http://www.barbarahartwellvscia.com

A Song for Us: Message of Hope from Geral Sosbee

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Those in our company search everywhere for an answer to the evil heaped upon us by torturers, misanthropes, and murderers whom we now recognize as almost inhuman; our profound love of life and shared sense of responsibility toward our fellow human beings provide the strength we need to follow the dream that our lives may someday be returned to us.

 

We appeal to them to stop; we humbly ask lawmakers and courts to address our legitimate needs; all pleadings are in vain and are answered by more attacks on our bodies and our minds.

 

Perhaps our suffering awakens in our souls a universal, but often muted, human quality that few ever fully know, or experience: an heightened sensitivity to all that is beautiful on earth, in the heavens and in mankind.

 

We therefore may rejoice during these holidays especially as we share with our special 'friends' in our journey of life the bond which is in a sense a song from the heart that stays with us 'for as long as we live'. 

 

God Bless Us All. Love To All.

 

 

From The Sound of Music:

"Climb every mountain,
Search high and low,
Follow every byway,
Every path you know.

Climb every mountain,
Ford every stream,
Follow every rainbow,
'Till you find your dream.

A dream that will need
All the love you can give,
Every day of your life
For as long as you live."

Howard Nemaizer & “Truth Talk News”: Unscrupulous Assault on Truth

PART ONE: Nemaizer Misrepresents COINTELPRO

Over a period of many years, I have been asked on numerous occasions, by friends and colleagues, why it is that I “bother” to expose those persons who are inconsequential in the larger picture of the events and issues of greatest concern, those who are mere amateurs, wannabes, and in some cases, stooges or minions of corrupt government operatives. Why not just ignore them?

My answer is consistently as follows: These characters may be “nobodies” and seemingly not worth the time or effort it takes to address their offenses. However, their aggression and burning ambition to “be somebody”, to seek public attention and approval, does create serious problems for their Targets, those of us who are already overburdened with the necessity of standing against political persecution, including libel/slander campaigns orchestrated by the government. These aggressors may be idiots, but by their unscrupulous worldly ambition, they pour fuel on an already raging fire.

Furthermore, it is a matter of principle. I won't stand by and allow false information to be promoted in connection with my name, or have my honor and integrity insulted, along with everything I stand for, when I can easily refute the lies with the truth and the facts.

The truth for the record, that is what matters to me. I don't care if they are world class evildoers or just garden variety busybodies. If they are crossing my line, invading my privacy, meddling in my business, promoting outrageous lies in connection with my name, I will not remain silent in the face of their wrongdoing, but, come hell or high water, will set the record straight.

Howard Nemaizer (using the pseudonym Nema) is a rank amateur, an extremely aggressive busybody, a name-dropper and gate-crasher who is attempting to make a name for himself by exploiting the names of well-known, legitimate journalists and whistleblowers. He apparently mistakenly believes that by riding the coattails of others, he can appropriate our many years of professional experience, hard work and hard-won expertise, and make himself seem "important" by association. And he has stirred up a world of trouble by his unconscionable exploitation and misrepresentation of the name and website of Barbara Hartwell, followed by his unjust and defamatory assaults on my character and good name.

Unfortunately, there are thousands upon thousands of Nemaizer's ilk engaged in the same type of endeavors, polluting the Internet with false information. These aggressive and ambitious amateurs scavenge information from sources (both legitimate and not) and post their shoddy "research" all over countless sites of social media, the 'comments' sections of websites, discussion groups, and in some cases, such as Howard Nemaizer ("Truth Talk News"), set up their own websites, which purport to be promoting "truth", when in fact their agenda is self-promotion and self-aggrandizement, usually at the expense of those whose names and work they are exploiting for their own unprincipled ends.

Aside from creating a nightmare for those legitimate persons whose work is being exploited and misrepresented, the result of this onslaught by aggressive and ambitious amateurs is that any person seeking truthful information on any number of subjects relating to unlawful and morally reprehensible government operations is faced with so much muddled information that sorting through it for any grain of "truth" becomes a daunting task.

And that's just the way the government likes it – in fact, they have orchestrated the control of the flow of information, along with carefully crafted propaganda, in such a way that even many of those who sincerely seek the truth won't be able to see the forest for the trees.

One area where Nemaizer has tried to latch on to the work of others concerns COINTELPRO, a program initiated by FBI director J. Edgar Hoover in 1956. The fact of the matter is that Howard Nemaizer does not know what he is talking about, as regards COINTELPRO, or any other government operations. He merely parrots the words of others, those who DO know whereof they speak. But it's more complicated than that, because he also parrots the words of others who do NOT know whereof they speak, and/or, he parrots the words of charlatans and shills who have the purposeful agenda of spreading false information. But any way you look at it, Nemaizer is nothing but an aggressive little parrot, entirely lacking in credibility.

As if this were not bad enough, Nemaizer mixes it all up until there is only a mish-mash of inaccurate information, some of which constitutes outright idiocy. But worst of all, as far as I am concerned, this aggressive fool has been exploiting MY NAME in connection with all of his misinformed opinions and promotions.

When, outraged by his wrongful actions, I protested his fraudulent public promotions in connection with my name. But rather than acknowledge his wrongdoing, rather than removing the fraudulent promotions, rather than issuing a public apology and retraction, he chose to launch defamatory assaults on my personal and professional reputation, and to engage in monstrous invasions of my privacy, even going so far as to drag my family into issues which are completely unrelated. Not only that, but he has fabricated outrageous lies in connection with all this, in attempts to justify the unjustifiable, to defend the indefensible.

In this series of reports, I will address the various issues on which Howard Nemaizer has made public comments, including most specifically in connection with my name. I will make the truth available for anyone who seeks it, and as always the readers may make of it what they will. I have used excerpts from previous reports as well as adding additional clarification where necessary.

My policy is to expose wrongdoers by very specifically citing their own words.

Howard Nemaizer:

"Many truth tellers have been targeted by COINTELPRO slander and sabotage such as myself, Truth Broadcast Network owner Harry Link and other patriots like Dr. Leonard Horowitz, author of EMERGING VIRUSES: AIDS AND EBOLA: NATURE, ACCIDENT OR INTENTIONAL, investigative journalists Sherri Kane, Janet Phelan, former CIA whistleblower Barbara Hartwell and many others."

Note that Nemaizer places himself into a list of names and identifies himself as a “truth teller” and a “patriot”. He tries to make it appear that all the individuals listed are somehow connected (as he did in his fraudulent notice, “TRUSTED PARTNERS IN TRUTH”), when nothing could be further from the truth.

And this statement by Nemaizer was made in full knowledge of my very public and clearly stated position AGAINST two of the persons named here, Harry Link and Janet Phelan, for cause.

Nemaizer KNEW, at the time he made this statement, that 1) I do not consider either of these individuals to be “truth tellers”, 2) that both Harry Link and Janet Phelan are heavy promoters and associates of liars, charlatans and disinformation specialists, 3) that I consider Janet Phelan a left-wing agitator for global government, and that she is a known advocate/supporter of the U.N. I broke off my association with her (2012) when I recognized the full extent of her leftist politics; when I finally realized that she was a collectivist who refused to respect the privacy and personal boundaries of individuals, including mine; and lastly, that she was trafficking with my enemies, going so far as to discuss me with them. And I do not even know Harry Link.

WHY would Nemaizer place MY name in a promotion with these individuals, who represent so much of which I vehemently oppose? If he cared in the slightest about “truth”, he would never do such a thing. And if he respected the personal boundaries and the clearly stated wishes of others (in this case, Barbara Hartwell) he would have left my name OUT, even assuming he wanted to promote these others.

Instead he tries to make it seem AS IF I am in some way connected to these individuals, when in fact I am not.

And there are many more such statements, made by Howard Nemaizer, which he has published in articles on his websites and in his videos, all exploiting the name of Barbara Hartwell. Contrary to his recent claim that ALL statements using the name of Barbara Hartwell have been removed from his websites, they most certainly have not.

It became clear to me that Howard Nemaizer was trying to create the impression that there is some sort of “group endeavor” among various individuals. But this has absolutely nothing to do with me. I am strictly independent, always have been; I am not a team player.

He throws my name in because he thinks promoting a former CIA agent in connection with his name will give credibility to anything he does, when in fact his whole agenda is based on falsehoods.

Now, regarding COINTELPRO: Howard Nemaizer has never been a target of any counterintelligence operation, which, as a counterintelligence expert, and a veteran of counterintelligence wars for decades, I can guarantee. He's a rank amateur, nothing more. Same goes for Harry Link. In fact, these two loud-mouthed grandstanders are actually serving the agenda of COINTELPRO by spreading false information and indiscriminately buying into all sorts of hoaxes, scams and carefully-crafted disinformation, which emanates from the very government-sponsored liars they claim to be “exposing”.

The one and only reason for “targeting” Howard Nemaizer would be if he had REAL GOVERNMENT TARGETS on his program. Legitimate persons are targeted wherever they go. They will be sabotaged and slandered as a matter of course. People like Nemaizer just get caught in the crossfire, hit with bullets that are not aimed at them, and then their egos get puffed up, when in fact the government considers them nothing more than collateral damage.

Here's another silly boast from Howard Nemaizer:

"Independent journalists and activists like myself are more often than not targeted by COINTELPRO in an attempt to quell truthful information the secret government wishes to suppress."

Well, first of all, Howard Nemaizer is not a journalist, nor is there anything “independent” about his activities. He is in fact a used car salesman (and it shows). He has no professional training or background in any field or discipline which would qualify him as an expositor of “truthful information”, except that which he scavenges from others. Even that is meaningless, because he corrupts the information with his own subjective and uninformed opinions and unwarranted assumptions.

So, why would the “secret government” be worried about “quelling” information from the likes of Howard Nemaizer? They wouldn't. The thought is laughable. He is not the source of anything that could possibly concern them. It amazes me how these amateur wannabes always try to make themselves appear to be a part of some cloak-and-dagger world they know nothing about.

Howard Nemaizer also makes accusations against various persons, calling them “COINTELPRO agent” or “COINTELPRO operative”, when in fact, though these individuals may be criminals or bad guys, they are not agents or operatives of COINTELPRO.

Like many rank amateurs, who do not know whereof they speak, Nemaizer seems to believe that he can slap this label on anyone he dislikes, or about whom he has heard nasty rumors. For example, he states that Michelle Wolven is a “COINTELPRO agent”. No, Michelle Wolven is an extremely aggressive busybody and stalker. She is a liar who makes false police reports against people, dragging them into court on her perjured testimony. She was running a massive libel/slander campaign against Dr. Antonella Carpenter, and targeted Barbara Hartwell for the same because I am a supporter of Dr. Carpenter . But Michelle Wolven is not a COINTELPRO agent, that I can guarantee.

Nemaizer has publicly stated (as if it were a fact) that John DeCamp is a “COINTELPRO operative”. No, John DeCamp is certainly a criminal and extremely corrupt, but he does not function as a COINTELPRO operative.

Then, there is the notorious career criminal, psycho-stalker Tim White.

Nemaizer writes:

"White and other COINTELPRO bad guy operatives began a relentless attack campaign against me for my association with Len and Sherri and other reputable people in the truth community such as former CIA whistleblower Barbara Hartwell. Take a moment to read what Barbara has put up with for many years from whacko nut job, Tim White on her blog."

First of all, Tim White is not, and has never been, any kind of "operative". He is merely a career criminal, a government stooge, exploited by actual COINTELPRO operatives. Howard Nemaizer clearly does not know the difference between an operative and a stooge. His ignorance of COINTELPRO is exposed, as he tries to present himself as some sort of authority on the subject. What's more he talks about “the truth community”. I am not a member of any such “community”; in fact I don't believe any such thing exists.

There was no “relentless attack campaign” against Howard Nemaizer by Tim White, only a few harassing e-mails and phone calls, just the usual directed against anyone who had Barbara Hartwell as a guest on a radio/TV show.

Then he makes another outrageously false statement:

"...what Barbara has put up with for many years from whacko nut job, Tim White..."

No, I have never at any time "put up" with anything from Tim White. How idiotic! I have, on the contrary, always done just the opposite: I have exposed the outrageous lies of Tim White. I have reported the criminal offenses of Tim White to the appropriate authorities.

Nemaizer is way out of line here. He can't seem to mind his own business, but tries to insert himself into an issue that has nothing to do with him. He tries to make it seem as if HE is a "target", when in fact he is not. Tim White harasses anyone who has ever had Barbara Hartwell as a guest on a radio/TV show, or who has used my name in any way other than in a negative context.

Again, Nemaizer gets caught in the crossfire and jumps at the chance to present himself as a target.

Here's another gem from Howard Nemaizer:

"PLEASE TAKE NOTE: John De Camp is a COINTELPRO operative, who steered attention away from Satanic Ritual abuse, the White House and the Bush Crime Family with the help of CIA Director William Colby."
 
Now, this is a totally absurd statement. Does Howard Nema know John DeCamp? No. Does he know, or has he ever known, anyone who is a reliable source of information about John DeCamp, who would have led him to believe such a thing? Not to my knowledge, but then, I do know that Nema does not have the discretion or discernment required to separate fact from fallacy.
 
Again, he makes this statement AS IF it is a statement of fact, thus misleading the reader to take it at face value.
 
In fact, John DeCamp is not a COINTELPRO operative. He has never “steered attention away from Satanic Ritual Abuse, the White House and the Bush Crime Family”. On the contrary, DeCamp FOCUSED attention on these issues, in collusion with the late COINTELPRO Kingpin Ted Gunderson.
 
Former Senator DeCamp was involved in Operation Phoenix (also connected to CIA MK Ultra), and his “official” position was an “aide” to Bill Colby.
 
John DeCamp threatened to sue Barbara Hartwell (2005) after I exposed his involvement in child sex trafficking, which he claims to have “exposed” in his book, The Franklin Coverup, which was in actuality a double coverup, a coverup of a coverup.
 
How would Howard Nema know anything about John DeCamp, Bill Colby, or anyone else he talks about? Answer: He wouldn't, he doesn't. He is merely speculating. And he is arguing from ignorance.
 
And even if he is scavenging from my published material on John DeCamp, he has made false assumptions and drawn erroneous conclusions from what I have exposed, which was a result of a longterm investigation (since 1997 and ongoing), including testimony of reliable witnesses, documented evidence and admissions of collusion, including from Ted Gunderson himself.
 
Howard Nema does not know what he is talking about, and considering the fact that he is using MY name on the same page, with his uninformed speculation about CIA, MK Ultra, and other operations of which he knows nothing, he has shown himself to be nothing more than an aggressive busybody, a name dropper and gate-crasher, sticking his nose where it does not belong, and promoting false information which can only muddy the waters, for anyone reading what he promotes.
 
If he is so hell-bent on making a name for himself, by exploiting the names of legitimate people (like Barbara Hartwell), by misrepresenting them and any information available to him, to suit his own purposes, I can guarantee that his only audience will be some credulous rubes, eager to buy into any conspiracy theories which come down the pike, no matter how dubious the source.

Howard Nemaizer has actually gone so far in his misrepresentations of COINTELPRO as to make a video, titled "UNDERSTANDING COINTELPRO".  

In this video, he drops some names (including Barbara Hartwell) and presents himself as an instructor to the audience, when in fact he is only parroting what others have said or written. Nobody watching this video could possibly come away with any real understanding of the subject. For those who do have knowledge or understanding, they would probably fall of their chairs, laughing, before they shut off the video. And remember, MY NAME was exploited here by Howard Nemaizer, in his bumbling attempts at "exposing" a subject about which he knows very little, and certainly is far from understanding. 

Now, moving forward to Howard Nemaizer's more recent comments about COINTELPRO, from a smear piece he published in efforts to discredit Barbara Hartwell.

"I am certain BH will take every word I write and in true COINTELPRO fashion, twist my words and the truth in an attempt to justify her lies and con-artist-like deceptions, and try to further discredit me as she was so skillfully trained to do by the CIA."

Here are the FACTS: I have never, at any time, spoken, nor written any “lies” about Howard Nemaizer. I am not a “con artist” nor ever have been, and I have never, at any time, attempted to promote any “deceptions” in connection with Howard Nemaizer. HE is the sole liar and deceiver, which I have documented in great detail, citing the specific incidents and situations in which Nemaizer's lies and deceptions caused massive damages and distress to me.

Nor have I ever “twisted” the words of Howard Nemaizer. No, I have addressed his words and refuted his false claims, always with precision, with hard facts and evidence of his wrongdoing.

Howard Nemaizer, on the other hand, has never once been able to cite any specific “lies” or “deceptions” on my part. The reason being simply that there have been none.

As for “the truth”, anyone with half a brain would be able to see that Nemaizer's claims of “truth” cannot possibly be taken seriously, because he lacks facts and evidence. Nemaizer's ideas of “truth” are his own subjective speculation and his emotional responses to being exposed for his wrongdoing, which he refuses to acknowledge. Therefore, like all liars, he projects his own wrongdoing, his own character flaws, his own evil intent, on me.

But, for the sake of argument, why would I have any reason to try to “discredit” Howard Nemaizer? My training has nothing to do with the issues he raises. He does not know anything about my training, any more than he knows anything about CIA.

Howard Nemaizer discredits himself, by his obvious ignorance, his foolishness and his malicious smears against a person who has never, at any time, done anything wrongful to him.

From the same idiotic smear piece, comes this:

"If you truly are a sovereign child of God, Barbara and not a CIA disinformation agent, do what Jesus would do. Turn the other cheek as I am going to do–and get on with your life."

Here it comes....the same old, same old accusation made by so many others of Howard Nemaizer's mindset: A “CIA disinformation agent.”

This libelous falsehood was first widely disseminated by FBI Chief, COINTELPRO Kingpin Ted Gunderson, then spread by all his minions and stooges, people like Ken Adachi, Tim White, Brenda Negri, Larry Lawson....and on and on....

But here's the real question: WHY would any actual “CIA disinformation agent” target the likes of this amateur wannabe, this loudmouth busybody, this name-dropper, gate-crasher and unrepentant liar, Howard Nemaizer? Who is Nemaizer that anyone would bother to target HIM for spreading disinformation? Utterly ludicrous, absurd and preposterous!

As far as his remark about doing what Jesus would do, he is only parroting something I said to him when he asked for my advice. He was planning to do something dishonest, which I told him I wanted no part of, and in which I took no part. He did it anyway, then apologized to me after I made it clear that his aggressive attitude towards me (including pressure tactics and even threats of using me as a “source' against my clearly stated wishes), would not be tolerated.

This issue was related to the criminal and charlatan, Fritz Springmeier, and a scheme by Howard Nemaizer and Harry Link to “set up” Springmeier, a foolish and dishonest plot which failed in its intent, but only exposed these two as parading idiots.

I will go into more detail on this, and other issues, in PART TWO of this series. I will again refute the lies of Howard Nemaizer, citing his own words and presenting the facts and the evidence to substantiate my truthful claims.

Barbara Hartwell Percival

Stating the Truth in Good Faith for the Public Record

December 17, 2015

Barbara Hartwell Percival
Legal Defense & Research Trust
PO Box 22
Rhinebeck, NY 12572
Barbara Hartwell Vs. CIA  
http://www.barbarahartwellvscia.com

FBI & Police Engage in Unstoppable Crimes

 

Woe to those who call evil good and good evil,
who put darkness for light and light for darkness,
who put bitter for sweet
and sweet for bitter.

Isaiah 5:20

"Every American whistleblower, whether he/she was police, intelligence agent or operative, government or private worker all know that for decades if you blew the whistle on your leaders, superiors, fellow workers, your agency, or company, you were sent to "whore shrinks" who always diagnosed you as having some type of mental disorder."

--Edward Schooling, former LAPD, ex-military black ops whistleblower, from his article KGB-style Punitive Psychiatry for American Dissidents (2002)

NOTE: This recent report by Geral Sosbee describes a tactic of special concern to both Geral and me. I refer to the use of psychiatric jargon by the police as a method of discrediting a Target, when the Target (in this case Geral Sosbee) reports crimes against his person and/or his property.

I have also included excerpts from a report I wrote in 2013, Political Targets & Medical Malpractice, as well as a brief statement from an article written by Edward Schooling. (See links below.)

I have discussed these issues at great length with Geral Sosbee since 2001 until the present, during which time Geral and I have been best friends and professional colleagues. I have also investigated many cases of persons so targeted, only a small fraction of which are addressed in reports on this site.

When a person is targeted for such hideous tactics, there are very few people who can possibly understand what it is like to have your life destroyed, piece by piece, suffering the physical and emotional pain,  knowing that you take a risk in reporting the facts of these campaigns against a Target, especially to the police.

But, the way Geral and I see it, not reporting these crimes is not an option.  We know that the criminals perpetrating them may carry a badge, or wield a medical license as a weapon against innocent persons, those who seek justice for the ongoing and increasingly grievous wrongs committed by those in authority.

The first step in stopping these crimes against persons is exposing the perpetrators, by name wherever possible.

Barbara Hartwell Percival

December 5, 2015

FBI & Police Engage in Unstoppable Crimes

This report focuses on fbi/police crimes and cover ups and related subjects. As a preface to the data presented here, I hope that the reader understands that my experiences with the fools who call themselves police and fbi reflect widespread societal disturbances due to the low mentality and unmitigated arrogance of the law enforcement community; my experiences are seen as a microcosm of the very dangerous national problem facing the (overthrown ) USA.

Over the past dozen years the fbi sends operatives who are instructed to harass and provoke me. When I try to file police reports on the criminal assaults and vandalism the police often refuse to take my reports. 

Two such incidents in Brownsville, Texas include a burglary and trashing of my condominium; I identified a suspect in that case, but the police refused to investigate. In another instance an fbi operative drove his truck at a high speed toward me and my wife as we tried to exit our parking space; this assault with a motor vehicle was troubling because we both had no way to escape from the oncoming threat. 

When the police arrived at the scene the thug went into his apartment and the police officer stated that he will not investigate because, “the man could have actually rammed you if he wanted to.”

Lately, I filed a police report on vandalism of my home. The police refused to provide me with a copy of the report, citing the family code exception to open records laws (OR). I notified the Texas Attorney General (AG) that the police unlawfully violated the OR laws and I explained how the police through deceit and manipulation of record & files repeatedly and intentionally violated the OR laws. The AG agreed with me and ordered the police to provide me with the records.

After that incident the fbi continued their crime spree by sending their operative to vandalize my car again by disabling the right front headlight. Here is the story of this incident:

On November 20, 2015, I and my wife entered the Brownsville, Texas Police Department (BPD) and reported the crime of vandalism of our car to police officer X. During the discussion, I also briefed X on the assaults against us in Brownsville by fbi operatives and by directed energy weaponry (DEW). In fact X was aware of my previous reports of crimes because he investigated one such offense.

For reasons unknown to me X in fact made no inquiry regarding the crime that I reported, but instead X focused on the following subjects as he stated that he and the police accept as valid any report by a medical doctor (referring to the false finding of paranoia entered by Dr. Holder on part twenty of my website).

X stated that I "should try taking the medication";

that filing a false police report is a crime;

that the police accept as fact any record by a medical doctor;

that he wants the name of the other doctor who I consulted for a second opinion of the Doctor Holder finding of ‘paranoia’."

A few minutes later as the meeting with X ended, I asked him if he wanted a copy of the enclosed repair invoice showing the evidence that someone disconnected the headlight. The Detective answered ‘yes’ and he made a copy of the invoice #xxxx for his office; then, as we exited X’s office, he asked my wife (away from my hearing) “where she and I met”.

As we were leaving the building, I asked X for a case number so I could obtain a copy of the report; he answered, ‘just a moment’. He then went into the dispatch room to obtain a case number; when he returned, he gave me his card with a number on it. When I presented the case number to the records office a few days later, the clerk advised me that the number that I provided to her was X’s phone number, and that no record exists regarding my report of vandalism of my car on November 20, 2015.

After I unsuccessfully tried to reach X at his office and by phone on the same day, I realized that X apparently refused to take the report. I then filed a verbal request with the BPD Internal Affairs Officer and with the records supervisor to kindly inquire as to why X ignored the evidence that I and my wife presented to him.

The above story is one of many instances where the police in Texas, California, etc., actually cover up crimes against me, my wife and my property. However, the injury to me does not stop with the police cover up, as the police actively seek to discredit me by pretending that false reports by medical doctors are valid.

On several occasions medical doctors and dentists actually torture and threaten me on behalf of of the fbi. I have documented several such episodes of crimes and intentional incompetence by doctors.

The wholesale manipulation of the police community by the fbi and the cia is global and presents a real quandary for the individual who is targeted for imprisonment or death. Thus, in many instances the victim of fbi/police abuses may discover an awful dilemma.

Of course, I realize that the formation of the current police state is the result of the more serious overthrow of the government of the United States of America by the intelligence services and that nothing can be done to stop the former, nor to reverse the latter.

Finally, I ask where is the media to cover these events that turn this nation and the world into a planet for killing, torture and imprisonment.

Political Targets & Medical Malpractice

Excerpt from Geral Sosbee:

This medical update is provided for two primary purposes:

1) assist all Targets of inhumane DEW and related attacks, so that each person so affected can fully realize the threat of misdiagnosis posed by some medical professionals

2) to provide a record of the utter failure of the medical community to provide a presumption in favor of the patient (a victim of high tech and other disturbing assaults) that in fact his condition and symptoms do not constitute, nor indicate, any form of paranoia

As shown in the medical report attached hereto, I presented for a routine medical exam on March 5, 2013, to Dr. Robert F. Holder of Harlingen, Texas.

I explained to Dr. Holder some of the symptoms related to DEW assaults and I briefly outlined my belief that the fbi is engaged in a high tech vendetta against me for reporting their crimes to the US Congress. 

I stated that sleep deprivation and related crimes against my person by government thugs are causing many medical symptoms.

The exam took place on the fifth of March, 2013, but on the seventh of March, 2013, the doctor revisited his medical chart to add the finding of "Paranoia Delusional Disorder".

Excerpt from Barbara Hartwell:

First, I should make it clear that I myself have been a Target of such DEW (directed energy weapons), and I am well acquainted with the attendant symptoms. When I first went public with my case of persecution by the government (1995), I did speak often of these assaults, in public lectures, on radio & TV programs and in my written reports.

(In one television interview, in February 1998, I briefly described some of the assaults with this weaponry. Former CIA agent Chip Tatum, also being interviewed with me, corroborated my testimony, which included being knocked unconscious, and admitted that he himself had used such anti-personnel technology against Targets during his tenure with CIA.)

I am not a scientist, nor have any expertise on this technology; however, I have learned a great deal about these anti-personnel weaponry systems, through my own research, which I found necessary, given that they had been deployed against me, as well as others close to me. I have also worked with experts on this technology in field investigations, in which we were able to document the use of this technology against Targets, including myself.

What I do know, beyond a shadow of doubt, is that the assaults on Targets are very real, and in some cases, continue over a period of many years.

In this case, the doctor issues a diagnosis of "Paranoia Delusional Disorder." But on what basis? Is Dr. Holder a psychiatrist? No, he is not. He is therefore not qualified to make such a diagnosis. Did Geral Sosbee seek out any form of psychiatric care? No, he did not, nor was that ever an issue of concern to him.

Geral Sosbee presented himself for a physical examination. He described certain symptoms, which he knew from many years of being assaulted with this directed-energy anti-personnel weaponry, to be a direct result of the assaults. For example, sleep deprivation, which has been used as a standard method of torture by intelligence agencies around the world. Yes, torture. That is what we are dealing with, in case anyone thinks otherwise.

One of the purposes of a neutralization campaign against a Target is to maintain long-term states of extreme stress to destabilize every area of a Target's life. Assaults with high-tech weaponry certainly accomplish this goal, as aside from the physiological symptoms and damages, there is intense emotional distress which cannot possibly be avoided in such a situation. But there is a great difference between "paranoia" and "delusion" and the natural physical and emotional effects of such assaults.

To label a person as "delusional" is to claim that the reported assaults are imaginary, rather than an actual event. Thus the purpose is to discredit the Target (in this case a de facto whistleblower, whose credentials are well established and documented for the public record), so that anything else he reports (government corruption, crimes, conspiracies, coverups) will also be disbelieved.

According to Geral, Dr. Holder spent a period of less than half an hour with him during the examination. At no time was there a discussion of anything but the nature of the specific symptoms, and Geral's truthful statements about the assaults on his person with the weaponry.

Also note that Dr. Holder only added his diagnosis of "Paranoia Delusional Disorder" to his report two days AFTER the examination. Why? During this time he had no further contact with Geral Sosbee.

So, here we have a "psychiatric" diagnosis, by a person not qualified to make such a diagnosis; for which there was no basis whatsoever to make such a diagnosis; but which now appears on a formal medical report in connection with Geral Sosbee's name. The very same tactic which had been used against him in 1978, when he was forced out of the FBI. The very same tactic used against him repeatedly, over more than three decades: to impugn the sanity of the Target so that he will be dismissed as a nutcase.

Lastly, I have my own opinion about Dr. Holder. And, unlike Dr. Holder's, my opinion is one I am qualified to make, as it is a "considered professional opinion", based on the areas of expertise I have developed, due to my own background and training. Among my areas of expertise are psychological operations and counterintelligence operations.

My opinion is that Dr. Holder is acting as an agent of such operations against Geral Sosbee. He is acting in collusion with others of his ilk, engaging in a malicious effort to destroy Geral Sosbee's life. Dr. Holder has not only made a false diagnosis, he is engaging in medical malpractice and violating the ethical standards which all physicians are sworn to uphold.

Dr. Holder should therefore be reported to any and all medical boards for his abuses of his patients. I use the plural "patients" because it is unlikely that Geral Sosbee is the first, or only patient to be treated in such an abusive and hostile manner.

Is Soviet Style Punitive Psychiatry Coming to America for Dissidents?

By Ed Schooling, former LAPD, former military/black ops

Excerpt from Ed Schooling:
 

"Every American whistleblower, whether he/she was police, intelligence agent or operative, government or private worker all know that for decades if you blew the whistle on your leaders, superiors, fellow workers, your agency, or company, you were sent to "whore shrinks" who always diagnosed you as having some type of mental disorder.
 
This was especially true if you did not "recant" your allegations, if they gave you that chance. These whore shrinks would write whatever they were told to write about you by the powers who paid them. And this was not about political dissent, rather about reporting major corruption.
 
Therefore if your facts of corruption were true, they would label you as a mental case. End of any internal investigation."

RELATED REPORTS

http://www.barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2013/03/political-targets-medical-malpractice.html

http://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2006/12/kgb-style-punitive-psychiatry-for.html



Barbara Hartwell Percival
Legal Defense & Research Trust
PO Box 22
Rhinebeck, NY 12572
Barbara Hartwell Vs. CIA    
http://www.barbarahartwellvscia.com

Compelling & Inspirational Message from Paul Baird to Former FBI Agent/Whistleblower Geral Sosbee

NOTE: With Geral's permission, I have posted this letter from Paul Baird.

As government whistleblowers, Geral Sosbee and I have endured decades of harassment, persecution, psy war and terror tactics by agencies of the U.S. Government, most notably FBI and CIA.

In the world of counterintelligence operations this is called a “neutralization campaign”.

Most of the tactics deployed against us are covert in nature, meaning that the perpetrators act under plausible deniability, and often under the 'color of law'. It is extremely difficult to address our grievances through the legal system. The judicial system is in thrall to the intelligence community, to the extent that the judges are venal, corrupt and in most cases simply disregard the Constitution, as well as the unalienable rights of the people.

We have learned, through many years of direct personal experience, that this criminal network is highly organized, widespread and has infiltrated every level of society.

In the case of the FBI's COINTELPRO (since 1956, under J. Edgar Hoover), the corrupt government agents use hirelings with no credentials and no official authority under the law, to do their dirty work of harassing/threatening Targets, and for conducting the libel/slander campaigns which destroy the Target's personal/professional reputation, and cause that person to be an outcast, a pariah, mocked and scorned by society at large.

In the cases of Geral Sosbee and Barbara Hartwell, we have experienced the worst of the tactics that drive a Target to financial destitution and/or bankruptcy and homelessness.

We have, at various times, been unable to rent a place to live, unable to conduct necessary business, because of the massive libel/slander campaigns against us. We have been denied competent medical and dental care, have been victimized by medical malpractice, or have been treated with great disrespect by professional practitioners in various fields.

We have repeatedly had our integrity insulted and our sanity impugned, simply for our truthful reports exposing these campaigns against us and exposing the corrupt system that has spawned these egregious injustices.

We have been abandoned and/or betrayed by some of those closest to us, from whom we should have been able to count on a reasonable expectation of loyalty and support.

All of this notwithstanding, I am always heartened when I see that someone (a rare person of honesty and integrity) does comprehend what is happening to those of us so targeted, and the reasons why.

Such is the case of Mr. Paul Baird. I greatly appreciate his work, I wish him all success in his humanitarian endeavors, and pray for him all of God's protection, guidance and blessings.

Barbara Hartwell Percival

November 29, 2015

Hi Geral,

I can certainly understand why you would feel that nothing will be achieved in your lifetime...Whistleblower protection is non existent, the politicians, mass media personnel, agency, military, law enforcement, legal, medical professions and others are either saturated with corrupt personnel or controlled by bogus "National Security" flagging. Those working around the more corrupt are given "non official cover", fed rumours, blackmailed over their careers, manipulated by their greed, ego etc. It's a sorry state of affairs. People who could make a difference end up marginalised or treated like your good self. Personally, I believe that a direct challenge to the nature of "National Security" itself is the key. Exec order 13526 expressly forbids using classification to cover crime, but then Murder is illegal too and yet they both happen every day. It's just words on paper. However....having said all that...

It is my belief that they cannot hide these crimes forever and they know it...hence the use of all manner of subtle adjustments to the psyche of the general public...Reality TV, CCTV, The Snowden revelations, social media, selfies, security searches at airports etc etc…

It's all preparing people for accepting a total lack of privacy, even to encourage voyeurism and exhibitionist behaviour with some. Terrorism, false flag operations, digital false flagging, the allowance of pedophilia and other crime also works to encourage people to fear others and surrender their hard won rights to the state...it's all evidence that they know the penny will one day drop. EG. The covers used through the psych' profession (paranoia, schizo', delusional stuff) could evaporate overnight if there was any real voice given to the millions targeted worldwide. Also a small group of insiders could always turn on them, hence the monitoring 24/7 of public figures, usually without harassment.
 

Nothing beats word of mouth and the number of people aware of all of this is growing all the time. The number that care...well, given the dumbing down and egocentric emphases thrown our way by the MSM, finding people that care is going to be far more difficult. We also need representatives that are honest enough to want the truth, intelligent enough to recognise it and brave enough to act on it.

Currently, the agency sifting removes all such people from positions of power and sees them targeted and mocked by those they position in authority or bestow with celebrity.

Like yourself, I've been at this for decades and there are times when it seems hopeless. It predates us and may continue after we're dead but our efforts will help those that eventually resolve this. Like many struggles throughout history, it takes the lifetimes of endeavor that people like you offer to make progress.

Apparently lost causes are often the most important and hardest fought. Look at the histories of enslaved and oppressed peoples...we're no different. Today's celebrities are no less hypocritical, today's leaders no less treacherous. It''s up to ordinary, decent people to make the difference. With God's help I believe this will be resolved one day.

Regards,
Paul

Paul Baird's Website:

http://www.surveillanceissues.com/

 

THE TRUTH ABOUT SECRET WEAPONS AND THE INVOLUNTARY TESTING OF THOSE WEAPONS ON CIVILIANS. THE PEOPLE TARGETED INCLUDE MANY WHO CHALLENGE ORGANISED CRIMINAL ACTIVITY WHICH IS CORRUPTLY PROTECTED BY GOVERNMENT / MEDIA INTERESTS.

Barbara Hartwell Percival
Legal Defense & Research Trust
PO Box 22
Rhinebeck, NY 12572
Barbara Hartwell Vs. CIA
http://www.barbarahartwellvscia.com