Barbara Hartwell

My photo
Independent Investigator, Intelligence Analyst, Journalist. Former CIA (NOC, Psychological Operations) Black Ops Survivor. Sovereign Child of God. Minister of the Gospel of Jesus Christ (Ordained 1979, D.Div.) Exposing Government Lies, Crimes, Corruption, Conspiracies and Cover-ups.

Friday, January 24, 2020



Erika Meyer Produces Video of Babbling Idiocy & Wild Speculation

On October 29, 2019 a woman named Erika Meyer produced two videos:

Disinformation theatre: Katherine Horton, Ramola D, Frederic Larouche, Melanie Vritschan (part 1)

Disinformation theatre: Katherine Horton, Ramola D, Frederic Larouche, Melanie Vritschan (part 2)

Looking more closely into the disinformation theatre, and into the background of Ramola Dharmaraj.


Erika Meyer: Just one among the idiot parade of Internet trolls –aggressive, ill-informed, moronic characters who apparently have nothing better to do with their time than engage in wild speculation, while promoting baseless, slanderous gossip about others.

The name of Barbara Hartwell was included in the speculative, defamatory ramblings of this woman. These characters are a dime a dozen, and ooze out of the woodwork to target legitimate people, usually journalists, activists, patriots, genuine government whistleblowers.

I've seen it time and time again. Their Targets (including me), after trying to ignore them (in the hope they may spontaneously self-destruct, or just go away), when exposing these idiots, will often make a comment, such as: I never heard of this whackjob. Yet he/she is grossly exploiting my name; making false accusations; fabricating weird/absurd stories about me; pretending that they “know” things, and/or falsely claiming there is some personal “connection” or “link” where absolutely none exists.

From my observations (and unfortunate experience) of being targeted by hordes of these creepy characters, they are ignorant, unprincipled persons seeking public attention – the more, the better, any way they can get it.

Since these wannabes have no credentials, no professional background of any kind, which could possibly qualify them to present any information of value (educational or otherwise), they resort to malicious aggression against others whom they envy (not in a good way), dropping names and crashing gates, foolishly thinking they can force their way into the legitimate business of others, and thus gain public acclaim they have not earned and do not deserve – except, of course, to be exposed as pretentious, babbling fools.

In a word, they are troublemakers. And I, for one, firmly believe they should be exposed, to set the public record straight, to refute their outrageous falsehoods, and as a warning to others to steer clear of them.

On what, exactly, did Erika Meyer base her idiotic babbling?

On a lone exhibit: a lurid “attack” chart produced by a notorious charlatan, Katherine Horton, the Tin Foil Princess of Eastern Europe; from a website called STOP 007, on which Horton has maliciously and profusely defamed Ramola D, Barbara Hartwell, Melanie Vritschan, Thomas McFarlan, with lurid and incendiary false accusations.

I must say it was a form of torture to listen to the ignorant ramblings of this woman, Meyer. Her whiny, nasal voice grates on the nerves, through 20 minutes of wild speculation, as she makes false connections and “links” where none exist; and as she expresses her delusions that SHE, Erika Meyer, is at the center of some grand conspiracy, spawned by those she claims are running a “disinformation theatre”.

As tiresome as it is, I took some notes, and will use this material to make an example of a typical participant in the Idiot Hit Parade, making videos which display nothing but their unmitigated stupidity.

Here are some statements (not exact quotes) from Erika Meyer, followed by my comments. Anyone who is interested in more idiotic details may listen to the video.


EM: I spent yesterday looking for more information on Ramola. I believe all the people on this page are disinfo people.

So, she is apparently doing “opposition research”, otherwise known as digging for dirt on a person she dislikes, in the hope of finding something she can use against her. As you read on, note that in her search for information on Ramola, she found no damning info, no titillating scandals, no criminal record, nothing at all –but typically for her ilk, that didn't stop her from breaking out the pole vault, flying through the ether and landing on her sorry butt, amid a trash heap of false conclusions.

EM: I mean, you know....most people who are called whistleblowers here are not, know, I can see a pattern and sniff these people out pretty quickly. Most people who call themselves TIs are hiding something.

On the chart to which she refers, I see not one person referred to as a “whistleblower”. And who does she think decides, who is, or who is not, a whistleblower? Is Erika Meyer the judge of that? Or, Katherine Horton, the architect of the chart? Neither of whom would qualify as whistleblowers, under even the most lax of standards.

Aside from knowing and stating the definitive qualifications of a whistleblower (based on facts and evidence), it would only be a matter of subjective perception and speculation, a “skill set” with which Erika Myer appears to have developed considerable expertise.

As for people who call themselves “TIs” hiding something? Speaking strictly for myself, as always, I do NOT call myself a TI, and have no commonalities with those who do, nor am involved with any of their groups. So, had she the slightest discernment, she would count me out.

What's more, anything I choose to “hide” from the prying eyes of the general public is my prerogative, my right. It's called PRIVACY, ever heard of it? No, indeed. For a snoop, gate-crasher and gossip like Erika Meyer, personal boundaries don't even exist.

NOTE: If you're looking for a bloodhound to “sniff out” a Target, don't call Erika Meyer.

Next, more speculation on Ramola:

EM: Ramola is of Indian descent... based on speech patterns I believe she was born in India. A lot of the mind control doctors are linked to India. All mind control is linked to frequency based stuff.

Ramola was born in India. That is a fact on the public record, which anyone can easily find, and which Ramola herself has stated publicly. So what? But her “speech patterns” do not necessarily reflect any particular country of origin, nor could be studied for even a clue as to her actual birth place. Erika Meyer doesn't know what the hell she is talking about.

And now Meyer brings in “mind control doctors”. Meyer claims many are “linked” to India. Does she offer any statistics, any sources? No. And what does any of this have to do with Ramola? Nothing whatsoever. Just more pure speculation, in a shoddy attempt to “link” Ramola to some sinister mind control operations.

And no, “all” mind control is not “linked to frequency-based stuff”. There are many methodologies used, which I won't bother to describe. I will only say that it is clear that Erika Meyer is sorely lacking in knowledge and understanding on this subject.

EM: Katherine Horton's video is a rehashing of this disinfo theatre. Could it be KH is advocating for frequency-based attacks?

I don't know what's the deal with Ramola, she is the first one that came to me in a dream. I got hints about she wasn't exactly what she seemed to be.

Meyer does not clarify her meaning, regarding Katherine Horton; it all sounds like gibberish.

And no, she most certainly does NOT know anything about Ramola. She claims that Ramola “came to her in a dream”. As usual, there is no description given, only more vague speculation about “hints” from a dream, in attempts to discredit Ramola and paint her as a suspicious character.

Now, she moves on to her next Target, Melanie Vritschan:

EM: Melanie is disinfo. I question if she was really pregnant, and had a child. I'm not saying she was kidnapped by the hospital, not saying she wasn't. I'm very skeptical.

Again, nothing but pure speculation. But the toxic seed is planted: Melanie might well be a liar, and all part of the so-called “disinformation theatre”. And again, no evidence, just her subjective speculation. But nonetheless, these false allegations could be very damaging to Melanie's reputation.

EM: Katherine Horton is accusing Ramola of inducing people to's all very confusing to me.

Well, she finally admits being confused. Confusion is always what results from engaging in wild speculation, with no concern for establishing facts. But does that bother her? Clearly not, as she continues to spew her uninformed idiocy.

EM: Katherine Horton is clearly very smart and a good public speaker.


I have seen no evidence of KH being “very smart”, based on her prolific public videos. What I have seen is an accomplished liar, a charlatan promoting false (and often contradictory) information, which is then repeated and parroted by Horton's entourage of sycophants and stooges.

Meyer's idea of a “good public speaker” is a theatrical display by a hysterical woman hunkering down in a tin-foil bunker, dropping F-bombs and issuing calls to action for murder of public officials and intelligence personnel? Or, droning on about “cartel signaling”, or collecting affidavits for fantasy court cases, which have never resulted in any justice for anyone foolish enough to join her scams (or pay hefty fees for her “counseling services”).

Then, Erika Meyer engages in more wild speculation about Horton's ethnicity, and that, maybe, Katherine Horton is not her real name. Again, no evidence is presented... maybe this, maybe that...maybe, maybe maybe. What's her point? As usual, she doesn't say.

Now, she goes back to her speculation on Ramola.

EM: I'm going to show what I found out online about Ramola.

She shows a screen shot of one of those commercial sites used by amateur sleuths, in the hope of digging up dirt on their enemies; sites that are notorious for providing misleading or outright false information. (Who cares? As long as they are raking in the money!)

Then, she points back to Horton's “attack chart”, and draws attention to the photo of “Barbara Hartwell (CIA)”.

EM: Just because it says Barbara Hartwell CIA doesn't mean her name is really Barbara Hartwell. Does it mean she's really linked to the CIA? No it just means somebody said these things.

Well, what a brilliant piece of detective work! Duh.

But for the record, Barbara Hartwell is my real name. And no, despite the decades-long promotion of liars like Horton, that I am CIA, I have been out of CIA for the past 26 years.

Meyer moves back to the document on Ramola, continuing her speculation.

EM: Tanis, I never heard of anybody having this last name. Is there a link to Egypt?

Next, a non-sequitur to the film Rosemary's Baby:

EM: There may be a link to Rosemary's Baby. It came out the year I was born. She's given tanis root to wear around her neck, a bad smelling herb, and now that I think about it there's indications of induced suicides in the movie.

Tanis, in fact, is simply a surname, with no sinister connotations, and not at all uncommon. In her vast ignorance, Meyer “links” it to TANNIS root (NOT “tanis”), and then babbles on that it is “linked” to suicide...and a film produced in 1968...the year she was born. So what? Many people were born in 1968. Does that make them all “linked” to Rosemary's Baby?

Are we watching The Twilight Zone? What's next...that the film was based on Ramola's life as a mind control doctor, a Svengali whose victims commit suicide? By Meyer's “logic”, anything is possible. But none of it factual, none of it true.

Next, she shows Ramola's photo, the one she uses on her website, and proceeds with her profound “analysis”.

EM: Earring in left ear I believe... is coded as meaning a restriction around the ear, and might also have to do with surveillance. The left side is linked to me and Curtis (?) She is also pictured with the right eye obscured so its a good thing to remember the deception. A square shaped necklace, square is 4, probably a link to the emperor and books behind her, she's a writer.

All these imaginary “codes” and links”. What a lot of stupid gibberish! Where she gets these silly ideas is anyone's guess, but not worth the time to examine. According to Erika Meyer, wearing an earring is a “code” for surveillance. That means, I guess, that anyone who wears earrings is to be suspected of some sinister plot? And she “links” the right eye to “deception”? And the square shaped necklace is a “link” to “the emperor”. What emperor?

This goes far beyond speculation into the realm of sheer nonsensical idiocy.

But it continues...

Meyer now states that Ramola is “linked” to Arlington, Virginia.

EM: Arlington is linked with military, and intelligence like the CIA kind of stuff. I think Arlington is pretty close to... the name just blew out of my mind, what's the name, McLean, is that the name? Very near where CIA headquarters is.

So now, she informs her audience that because the location of Arlington appears on some site, along with Ramola's name, it MUST BE some “link” to the military, to intelligence and to... (cue the drum roll)...the nefarious world of CIA!

CIA headquarters is in Langley. But so what? Now, according to the flawless “logic” of Erika Meyer, anyone who ever lived anywhere in the general area of Virginia, has “links” to CIA?

And the babbling idiocy rolls on...

EM: I think it also links her to Michelle. What I'm getting to is the idea that Ramola, like Katherine Horton, actually has a longstanding history with me personally and with what I call the trafficking system around me.

She is in fact linked with me is a significant way, people who are linked with me in a significant way often are referred to in a fictionalized way.

Now, it gets really bizarre. Erika Meyer is claiming that Ramola is “linked” to her, by a “longstanding history”. And that there is a “trafficking system” around her.

Does she present any explanation of this history, or this trafficking system? No, of course not. It is sheer delusional fantasy. And to claim that this utter nonsense is a “fact” only shows how out of touch with reality she must be.

Who are the fictional characters? And who is Michelle? And why is she exploiting Ramola's name in her attempt to weave a tall tale, in which SHE, Erika Myer, appears to play a starring role?

Finally, it ends with this:

The name Dharmaraj, she like Katherine Horton has a key role in a longer standing relationship. It's possible that Ramola is linked to Michelle so its link after link after link.

Erika Meyer seems to be obsessed with “links”. Links that lead nowhere and exist only in her mind, by virtue of her obvious psychopathology, mixed with ignorance and plain old stupidity.

If a link does not exist, no problem, she will fabricate one. And no doubt, she will keep on babbling.





By their fruits shall you know them.

Barbara Hartwell
January 24, 2020

PS: Erika Meyer, next time you make one of your idiotic videos, LEAVE MY NAME OUT, or take the consequences.