I
first came into contact with Ramola D/Dharmaraj in late March of this
year, when she invited me to be interviewed on her podcast, Ramola D
Reports.
I
was introduced to Ramola by FBI whistleblower, Geral Sosbee, whom I
have known as a personal friend and professional colleague since 2001
and with whom I have had a close working relationship in exposing and
standing up against FBI/CIA massive criminality/corruption.
(See
the many reports on this site written by Geral Sosbee, some of which
we co-authored.)
As
one of many in the multi-pronged assaults by counterintelligence
operations (FBI, CIA inter alia), we have reported on the deployment
of directed energy weaponry (DEW), otherwise described variously as
“anti-personnel”, “non-lethal” (a misnomer!),
“electro-magnetic”, etc. etc.
I
should state that science/technology is not one of my areas of
expertise (far from it), but that, as a journalist, I have been
investigating/reporting on this technology since the 1980s. My
interest has been compelling, for the simple reason that it had been
used against me (as well as my family, friends and colleagues), in my
case since early childhood, as part of the horrors perpetrated by CIA
via MK Ultra.
However,
I do have expertise in other areas, especially, for the purpose of
the issues covered here, psychological operations,
counterintelligence, which are comprised of a wide range of
disciplines.
I
have, since April of this year, been working on an ongoing series of
podcasts with Ramola, covering these issues, which include
discussions of my personal experiences regarding this weaponry.
Ramola,
as she states, has done intensive investigations on this technology
and has interviewed numerous professionals, some of whom are
scientists with expertise in this field. Her own knowledge of this
weaponry, and its applications, is impressive and she also holds a
degree in physics.
And
equally important is that she works not only to expose the technology
to the general public, but also to provide assistance to those who
have been targeted for brutal abuse by it, including journalists,
whistleblowers and activists.
Since
getting to know her I have come to have tremendous respect and
admiration, not only for her professional work, but for her as a
person of honesty and integrity.
All
that said, I feel it to be a moral imperative to stand with her on
several issues which have been raised, most recently her
involvement in a weekly forum, Techno Crime Fighters, which ended in
July of this year.
I
must state for the record that I speak strictly for myself, based on
my own observations regarding this public issue. I have not had any
involvement whatsoever in this group, nor am I personally acquainted
with any of the former members, with the exception of Ramola.
However,
my name has repeatedly been publicly dragged into this controversy,
despite the fact that I had no direct involvement. Appearing as a
guest on Ramola's podcast in a series of interviews is in no way
related to her involvement in any groups (including JIT or Techno
Crime Fighters).
Nor
have I ever been involved with any groups or organizations of those
who describe themselves as “targeted individuals” (TIs). I have
often seen references to what has been described in broad terms as
“the TI community”. Again, I am not involved, nor have any
contact with these collectives.
I
have made it very clear, by notices on this website, going back many
years, that any/all reports I make (written or on radio/TV/podcasts,
etc.) are FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. The reading/listening
audience may make of my reports what they will.
I
do not solicit comments from the public, nor do I engage in public
discussions, arguments or debates. I am not a participant in social
media, discussion groups, etc.
In
my view (which I fully understand is far from the norm), the Internet
is a hotbed of aggressive busybodies; it is a free-for-all, where
anything goes, where the privacy and personal boundaries of
individuals are grossly disrespected. It is certainly a function of the Surveillance State.
In
particular, some of the people in the “comments” section of the
You Tube videos I have done with Ramola have been slinging my name
around, drawing false conclusions, making erroneous suppositions and
unwarranted assumptions and engaging in rank speculation, based on
nothing more than their subjective perceptions and personal biases.
Worse,
my name has now been dragged through the mud in connection to
Ramola's podcasts addressing the end of Techno Crime Fighters. I
don't blame Ramola. She is not responsible for the smears of ignorant
and malicious people, most of whom are anonymous cowards, hiding
behind silly screen names.
And
more specifically, Ramola has been the Target of accusations which
have no basis in fact, along with hideous threats, including of an
obscene nature, such that she should be brutally raped! This
appalling behavior reflects severe psychopathology, and has nothing
to do with the actual issues addressed in Ramola's reports.
Here
I have given links to a written report by Ramola, along with an
accompanying podcast. I have taken excerpts from the written report,
which I have found to be especially significant, followed by my own
commentary.
But for a comprehensive view,
please read the entire report and watch the podcast.
The
End of Techno Crime Fighters Forum: The Real Backstory
EXCERPTS:
"One
of the larger issues concerning all 3 of us—all through the past
year–was her use of a highly unsettling language of violence that
had for a long time put us and many reporting viewers—including
prominent government whistleblowers and TI (“Targeted Individual”)
activists–on edge: the habit she had fallen into of calling for
bullets through brains, or putting people in crosshairs, or
suggesting people take shotguns into places of work (the NSA, to be
precise) and blow brains off, or calling for the military to take
people out, people in fact that were named, often titular heads of
Intel – these references to violence and occasional calls to
violence, however theoretical, or rhetorical, all offered variously
in jest, indignation, or to mere dramatic effect."
"This,
I should clarify, and underline, was quite separate and different
from the death penalty she advocated and Karen supported, as a just
and legal means of dealing with Deep State Intel and military crooks
who are currently openly torturing millions in their own homes with
“Surveillance” or Military electromagnetic and acoustic weapons,
and calling reporting victims delusional and schizoid when they
report it—supported by the Propaganda & Deceit Brigade of
Mainstream Media, as well as the Deceit & Authoritarianism of
Collusive Psychiatry. While Millicent and I do not support the death
penalty and have said so, Karen and Katherine do support the death
penalty and have said so. No-one was censored for a difference in
opinion; we have each freely aired our views on this subject, and
none of us stopped the other from airing her views."
"To
reiterate, this was not about the death penalty; this was talk of
violence quite separate from that. Regular viewers will understand
what I refer to here; others only have to go back and check our
Techno videos or her own videos made at her channel which echo the
same theme."
"Furthermore,
there were occasions when the death penalty or the emphasis on
administrative address of crime was brandished by her as an add-on or
tag -on to a blasé rendition of Off-with – their-heads! which was
all very humorous no doubt at first but hardly convincing as an
innate appeal to legal redress alone, and increasingly distressing as
yet another incident of talk we found discomfiting."
In our last historic email exchange, Millicent wrote:
"Talk of us
doing ANY violence or promoting violence by anyone other than law
enforcement and then only when warranted, should never be said of us.
If they can go back to any Techno episodes and prove it was done, or
at least that’s the way it sounded, we in America can be charged
with conspiracy to commit acts of terrorism OR inciting to riot. Not
to mention that State law says I have a duty as a mental health
professional and a pastor to report such talk. Because of that, I
cannot be part of any televised media where such talk is even
jokingly suggested. We might be held accountable for the actions of
others. It IS NOT alright to make such statements then say, O I WAS
JOKING. A jury would not care."
...Thomas McFarlan has looked through the videos and identified a few time-markers where such statements were made:
Tech
Crime Forum 66: Segment 1:33:00 – 2:00:02
Tech
Crime Forum 70: Segment 1:46:41 – 1:52:00
Stop007
“Extreme Distress” video: Segments 3:15 – 18:00 / 21:50 –
26:30 / 37:33 – 39:51))
This
is from a note Karen left on Facebook to similar
accusations―currently flying fast and furious from the planted and
paid cyber-trolls on Youtube and Facebook seeking to add to
Katherine’s attempt to destroy my public name and reputation as a
writer and journalist ―that I am a “plant” or “perp”:
"Dr.
H. had started stepping over the line calling for violence against
the perps OUTSIDE the law. We tried to gently reign her back but she
was in denial. We have now found the examples of it to point ppl to.
Ramola is no perp, she is more mature and responsible than many
people and her brilliant journalistic work will go down in history.
No one has done more for the TI community. Dr. H. would have been
similar but for this incident. Sometimes ego is not worth it, we just
have to suck it up, take responsibility and say “I’m sorry”.
The decision was discussed as to whether to include her in the last
TCFF sign off, very reluctantly we realized it would just be an on
air fight. No one is happy how this went into the toilet."
"An Intel-Set-Up Break-Up; Not Recognizable as My Colleague; Not Really Ramola; Ramola was Neurotech’d to Bits and Fully Taken Over”: It’s lucky I have a good sense of humor, because my first response to hearing this massive platter of slander on Katherine’s video (after my eyebrows descended from the ceiling) is to fall over laughing."
"But
it is remarkably insidious to suggest that there were no real issues
here on the Techno team, and that one member of the team who returned
group attention to the key extant issues with Techno on an email
thread cannot be taken seriously because she was “taken over,”
and suddenly neurotech’d to oblivion and turned into an
Intel-handled monster who was absolutely unrecognizable as her
previously sane colleague. It is salutary to note as well that when
Katherine says this, she also points to and seeks to underline my
“victim” status as a clear token of disempowerment, repeating
that I am a victim, who is “chipped”
(and that her donation of a RFID bug detector has indeed established
this), and therefore not to be blamed, since I (by virtue of being
chipped, apparently) was essentially mentally disabled and had
no private defences, and was so profoundly “taken over.” I
believe she forgives me as well, in this masterpiece of sleight of
hand where she gets rid of the opposition in short order by crying
Mind Control! Not to Blame! Wasn’t her really! Lost her marbles!
Taken over!"
"Which in itself is a huge mockery and exaggeration of the very real fact of people in society today, in 2018, in this new Delgado-to-Obama Millenium of the Brain, indeed being subjected to Remote Neural Influence Technologies.
But
it is also a very specific public and defamatory attack on my
integrity as a person, my cognitive and analytical skills, my
discernment and thinking processes, my sovereignty as a thinking and
feeling human being who just happens to be working publicly in this
space as a journalist."
Now,
I feel it important to speak about these issues in support of Ramola.
I
did watch a number of the podcasts of Techno Crime Fighters' Forum.
And I did observe the behavior of Katherine Horton, on more than one
occasion, as openly advocating violence against specifically named
persons, such as Gina Haspel. A “bullet in the brain” was one
such statement. The dropping of F-bombs accompanied these rantings.
Personally,
I do not have any problem with “swearing”, per se. I do it
myself, as any friend of mine (including Ramola) could attest. I try
not to do it to excess, especially on radio programs, but that is
just me.
However,
I do think that in what is supposed to be a professional presentation
on crimes against persons, committed with impunity by government
agencies, it does not enhance the credibility of the group as a
whole, especially if the other members have voiced such concerns,
which are apparently being disregarded.
But
inciting violence and terrorism through advocating unlawful actions
is quite another issue. Such talk of violent actions, outside the
law, by a person in another country, not only reflects badly on those
in the TCF forum who disagree, but could easily bring serious
consequences to those living in this country, especially considering
the fact that they have been targeted by those who are looking for
any possible window of opportunity (“legal” or otherwise) to do
maximum damage, including under the color of law.
Self defense, on the other hand, is an unalienable right, as protected under the Constitution.
Lastly, I find it necessary to address the issue of the accusations against Ramola, such that she is not in control of her own mind, or actions, due to interference by psychotronic weaponry. I find this to be not only insulting, but absurd.
In
many hours of telephone conversations with Ramola, discussing all
sorts of issues, I have never once heard anything from her which
could possibly indicate such “control” being remotely wielded
over her words or actions. Nor have I ever known her to be inconsistent in her stated
principles, nor to make wild, unsubstantiated accusations against
anyone.
Anyone who wishes to reach their own conclusions about these issues may see these links to podcasts:
RELATED LINKS
Note/Techno Crime Fighters Forum
The End of Techno Crime Fighters' Forum (Stop 007)
In
summary, I have addressed these public issues as a journalist making
independent observations and analyses. I do not presume to speak for
anyone but myself. My support of Ramola is based on shared objectives
and primarily on principle. Readers, as always, may make of it what they will.
Thank you for your consideration.
Barbara
Hartwell
August
16, 2018
