"You see the problem here with Barbara Hartwell's hysterical, hateful, anti-politically-uncorrect comments by Maggie? She never delved into the possible justification for Maggie's comments, never checked to see whether Maggie might have suffered or witnessed some terrible traumatic event caused by members of some racial or religious group."
[BHP: "Hysterical"? "hateful"? How typical from a pretentious fool, projecting his own biases and unbridled emotions on me. Mr. Hurt does not know me. He has no idea what I have, or have not, "delved into". And I am not required to explain myself, or justify myself, or my viewpoints, to anyone. As far as I am concerned, there is no "justification" for the flagrant bigotry of a person going on the public airwaves, "calling a spic a spic". Maggie Roddin has the right to free speech. Does that make her speech "just"? Not in my book, and I'll say so anytime I please.]
"Maybe Barbara forgot about the 9-11 incident, the race riots over Rodney King's beating, the genocide in Darfur and Rwanda, the incessant clamoring of Mexicans over taking their land back from the US, the mindless hatred of George Zimmerman by black activists in and out of government occasioned by the unwillingness of the Sheriff and State Attorney to arrest and prosecute Zimmerman even though his assailant had caused the incident in which the assailant lost his life."
[BHP: Here again, Mr. Hurt brings up issues which have nothing to do with the particular report he has chosen to comment on, and turns it into a personal attack against Barbara Hartwell. Again, he engages in wild speculation about my motives, or my purported knowledge/viewpoints (about which he knows nothing), and spouts off his own opinions about these issues, which were not addressed in this particular report. What's his point?]
"Barbara forgot all about that and didn't bother inquiring, so just as has happened in this forum, she derailed the discussion, preventing anybody from making any point, and substituted therefore the non-point of bigotry complaints."
[BHP: What's with this guy? He thinks he has some kind of supernatural radar by which he can determine what's in my mind? What he claims I "forgot"? What I know, or don't know? What I did or did not "inquire" about? Wrong again. He doesn't have a clue. None of this has anything whatsoever to do with the report I wrote.
But more to the point, who the hell does this busybody think he is? It's none of his damned business, and it might behoove him to recognize the fact that I did not personally "derail" anyone's discussion, as I DID NOT POST MY REPORT ON ANY FORUM. I wrote a report and posted it on my own website. Period. It was later posted on a forum by someone else. That in no way requires me to answer to any idiot who comes out of the woodwork and wants to chime in with his ignorant comments.
But if Mr. Hurt enjoys putting his idiocy on public display, far be it from me to try to stop him.
And how dare he presume to address me, a person he does not know, by my Christian name? He is not on a first name basis with me and never will be. But how very typical of an intrusive busybody such as he is.
"By presenting her hateful, prejudicial commentary, Janet,
you apparently intend to justify Wolf's hateful derailing of the discussion
about improving the nation through benign eugenics programs, which he did by
calling me a bigot and racist. Do you have anything meaningful to contribute to
that actual issue, or do you intend to snatch one opportunity after another to
jam your political views about racism and bigotry down the throats of all who
will tolerate it?"
[BHP: Well, now Mr. Hurt attacks Janet Phelan, about issues which again, have nothing to do with me or my report. If Janet found my report to have merit, and she posted it on a public message board, that's fine with me. But for me, that is where it ends. I am not a member of this forum, do not know the persons he refers to, and have no interest in anything but refuting his moronic statements about Barbara Hartwell.]
"It seems never to have occurred to you or Wolfgram that tha ACTUAL issue warrants intelligent discussion and debate. Even Barbara admitted government, with full support of some political parties, seems intent upon doing precisely the opposite of benign eugenics through refusal to enforce immigration laws and eject those who have entered the USA illegally."
[BHP: Wrong again. I "admitted" nothing of the kind (and don't call me by my first name, fool). Again, I simply wrote a report. Mr. Hurt, like others of his ilk, is again engaging in speculation, making unwarranted assumptions, and putting words in my mouth. If Mr. Hurt wants to refer to statements I made, then why doesn't he stick to what I ACTUALLY wrote, if he is so hell-bent on discrediting my statements?]
"She goes blind, deaf, and almost dumb with insane rage over the way Maggie expressed herself. She intends to shut Maggie up or force her to express herself according to Barbara's view of political correctness. I don't see how anyone could esteem Barbara any more than Maggie for such ridiculous behavior. That's something the two should handle privately, off line, outside the forum.
In the same vein, you and Wolfgram ought to take up your complaints against me, Zerman, etc., privately, not in this group.
In the future we can do that, if you don't mind. Please send my response to your undisclosed recipient list."
[BHP: Ridiculous behavior? Take a closer look in the mirror, fool!]
"She goes blind, deaf, and almost dumb with insane rage over the way Maggie expressed herself."
Who is "she"? Who is Mr. Hurt referring to? Janet Phelan? or Barbara Hartwell? He doesn't specify and consequently does not make himself clear.
And how dare you, you presumptuous fool! "Insane rage"? It appears this applies to you, Mr. Hurt, which you once again project onto others. No one (neither Janet Phelan nor I) could possibly be described by any rational person in such a manner.
As for Maggie Roddin, I don't know her. I have no agenda whatsoever in regard to her, and unlike this crew of aggressive busybodies you hang with, I have no interest in "forcing" my opinions on anyone, nor silencing anyone. I am not a member of any forum, but if Janet chose to post my report there, that was her prerogative.
And I have to wonder again, who the hell this character, Bob Hurt, thinks he is? Now, he's telling Janet Phelan what she "should" be doing? She posted a PUBLIC report on a PUBLIC forum. Mr. Hurt chose to comment of his own volition. And now, he wants to offer not only his "unsolicited opinion", but his unsolicited advice (even worse!), while not even making it clear to whom he refers, Janet Phelan, or Barbara Hartwell.
I reserve the right to state my views, in my own reports, on my own website, or on radio broadcasts where I am invited to speak, on the issues of concern to me. Speaking strictly for myself, I consider any kind of bigotry, racism and the accompanying hate propaganda to be despicable, to be evil, an abomination to God.
And thankfully, there are others who agree with me, including Janet Phelan. Their decency and integrity is the main reason I have chosen them for my friends and colleagues.
As for you and your ilk, who call yourselves "patriots", May we forget you were our countrymen.
And here's my prayer for all the bigots, racists and hate-mongers of the world:
May God give you a love of the truth...but if you don't have eyes to see, or ears to hear, then may God's Swift and Terrible Justice be visited upon you.
Barbara Hartwell Percival
May 16, 2012
Barbara Hartwell Percival
Legal Defense & Research Trust
Barbara Hartwell Vs. CIA