Barbara Hartwell

My photo
Independent Investigator, Intelligence Analyst, Journalist. Former CIA (NOC, Psychological Operations) Black Ops Survivor. Sovereign Child of God. Minister of the Gospel of Jesus Christ (Ordained 1979, D.Div.) Exposing Government Lies, Crimes, Corruption, Conspiracies and Cover-ups.

Tuesday, November 22, 2016



Please read PARTS ONE & TWO before continuing. They are parts of a whole and not meant to stand alone.

If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

--Sun Tzu, The Art of War

This report focuses on psychological warfare, and more specifically on the plots and schemes of the predators and tyrants who would dominate the entire world, by imposing global government, and some of the tactics they use to achieve their ends.

Know your enemy...or suffer the consequences.

But before addressing the enemy, consider the importance of knowing yourself.

Know yourself: What exactly does that mean? How much thought, how much reflection, how much effort, how much experience does it require?

Do you believe you know yourself by how you choose to define yourself?

If so, is your self-definition based on the color of your skin, your eyes, your hair? Based on your gender? Your ethnic origin? On the country in which you were born? The country in which you reside? The environment in which you were raised? Your religion, or lack thereof? Your political ideology? Your educational or professional background?

Is knowing yourself achieved through considering any of the above? All of the above? None of the above?

Do you believe you can know yourself by how others define you? Have you become an unwitting slave to the opinions of others? Are your actions determined by the directives issued by others, whether or not they have any lawful authority over you? By the expectations, the “shoulds” and “should nots” of others? Are you an approval-seeker, a people-pleaser?

Or, do you know yourself, not by any self-definition per se, or definition based on the opinions of others, but by that which lives within you, by what resides in your heart? Your hopes, dreams, aspirations, what and whom you love, admire, respect, honor and cherish. What and whom you fear, despise, denounce, condemn, repudiate?

More important questions might be:

What are you willing to work for, to stand up for, to fight for, even, if necessary, to die for?

What principles do you hold dear? What are your moral standards? What are your standards for your treatment of others? Are they the same standards for how you expect to be treated by others?

What behaviors and actions are you willing to tolerate from others, and where do you draw the line on what is intolerable, insufferable?

What are your standards for what is good and what is evil? What is righteous and what is wrongful? Honorable and dishonorable? Which standards are based on abiding universal truths and which are based on falsehoods, spread by propaganda meant to inculcate the populace into accepting, even embracing, that which is evil, masquerading as that which is good?

Do you adhere to moral absolutes, or will you compromise by adopting moral relativism, situational ethics, social engineering?

What kind of society, what kind of civilization, what kind of country do you want to live in, not only for yourself, but for your family, your friends, your children, your grandchildren?

Are you willing to conform to the prevailing winds of doctrine (political, religious, secular, social), to go along to get along, even when you know in your heart that they are unjust, immoral, wrongful? Do you unquestioningly accept doctrinaire political correctness, just because you believe “everybody does it”?

Have you sacrificed your ability for independent reasoning, critical thinking, so you can “fit in” with the societal “norms”?

These questions could go on interminably, and this report is not meant to answer them, for only each individual can do so.


But there are more questions, no less important than those of knowing yourself:

How do you know your enemy?

Who is your enemy? On what basis, what standards, do you judge who is your enemy? How do you determine the characteristics of an enemy?

Speaking for myself, based first and foremost on the Principles of the Inviolability of Personhood, the Unalienable Rights of the Individual, and the corresponding Principle of Non-aggression, I can give a list of well-considered characteristics of “The Enemy”.

The Enemy is always an aggressor. Let me repeat that: The Enemy is always an aggressor. In a universally applicable sense, aggression is the root of all evil.

Aggression takes many forms, some of which I will specify here. Simply put, aggressors are persons, or groups of persons, who DO NOT RESPECT the Inviolability of Personhood. Who DO NOT RESPECT the privacy, the personal boundaries, the integrity, the unalienable rights, of individuals, the sovereignty of nations.

There is open aggressiveness and there is passive-aggressiveness. Either way, it is still aggression, and in order to fight back you must understand what drives the aggressor.

The motivations of the aggressor, which speak to a deeper level of the root of evil, may be greed (the excessive and disproportionate love of money and material possessions), lust, hatred, malice, ego-gratification, ambition, the will to power. But regardless of the motives, the aggressor seeks to serve himself and/or his accomplices, his “tribe”, his cronies, his nation, his religious and/or political establishment, at the expense of all others, with no concern as to the consequences (always harmful and unjust) to his Targets or Victims.

The Enemy is any person who hates me without just cause.

The Enemy is any person who wishes me harm, who holds malice or murder in his heart against me, or against my friends and allies.

The Enemy is any person who draws first blood, who attacks me (in any way) without just cause.

The Enemy is any person who would interfere with me, or those under my protection.

The Enemy is any person who seeks to manipulate me.

The Enemy is any person who seeks to exploit me for his own gain.

The Enemy is any person who seeks to steal from me, including my private property and the fruits of my labor.

The Enemy is any person who seeks to impose control over any aspect of my life.

The Enemy is any person who seeks to impose his will on me.

The Enemy is any person who seeks to force his beliefs, his mindset, his religion, his standards, his opinions on me.

The Enemy is any person who bears false witness against me.

The Enemy is a liar and a false accuser against me.

The Enemy is any person who seeks to deceive me, who knowingly makes false promises or acts in bad faith in his dealings with me.

The Enemy can be a transgressor, a violator, an intruder, an interloper, an invader, an abuser, a thief, a predator, a murderer, a rapist, or in the most reprehensible of cases, all of the above .

The Enemy is any person who refuses to respect the principle of voluntarism. Free will: The right of the individual to self-determination, to take voluntary action and to defend himself against forced compliance with any system which violates his unalienable rights.

The Enemy is any person who seeks to violate my God-given (natural, inherent) unalienable rights.


Based on my personal and professional experience, my observations, my research, my investigations, spanning decades, the most pressing problem for most of the people I have known is that they DO NOT KNOW who their enemies are.

And because they do not recognize the enemy, they are not prepared to defend themselves until it is too late. And that is precisely what the most reprehensible of enemies are banking on.

Now, for some examples, specifically related to persons/groups who have declared their enmity to these united States of America, to the principles of Liberty on which this nation was founded, and their plots and schemes to steal our freedom, to impose on us their political, social and religious agendas, to expunge our sovereignty, to violate our unalienable rights, as protected under the U.S. Constitution.

In their own words, here are their threats, here are their subversive objectives, here are their plots and schemes, their conspiracies against America.


Augustin Cebada, Brown Berets:

"Go back to Boston! Go back to Plymouth Rock, Pilgrims! Get out! We are the future. You are old and tired. Go on. We have beaten you. Leave like beaten rats. You old white people. It is your duty to die ... Through love of having children, we are going to take over.”

Now, here's a guy who meets my standards for an enemy – in spades. He actually believes that “You old white people” (that would be me, as well as quite a number of my friends, relatives) have “a duty to die”. He openly states that he and his invading army of Brown Berets will be “taking over”.

With murder in his heart, he gleefully proclaims he will conquer this nation with a foreign invasion, based on nothing more than his ever-proliferating progeny.

Here's another one, cut from the same cloth:

Richard Alatorre, Los Angeles City Council:

"They're afraid we're going to take over the governmental institutions and other institutions. They're right. We will take them over ...We are here to stay."

Anyone consider this guy an enemy of America?

And lest anyone call me a racist, simply for pointing out well- documented facts, I have no problem whatsoever with any person, regardless of “race”, ethnic origin, country of origin, etc. coming here and applying for citizenship, through lawful channels.

Anyone who seeks citizenship is bound by the law and required to honor the law. Once citizenship is granted, that person's unalienable rights are protected under the Constitution.

But for all others, though they have unalienable rights, they have no Constitutional protections, not in this country. Nor are they entitled to receive welfare, to vote, or to otherwise engage in any form of interference which would be a threat to the citizens of this country.

Apologists who defend this invasion coming over the borders will say, Well they are only seeking a better life. For some, that may be true. But what about the law-abiding citizens who live here, work here, raise their families here? It would be reasonable to believe that we too aspire to a better life, whatever our circumstances may be.

If illegals are compromising our standards of living by offering themselves as cheap labor, thus taking jobs from Americans; if they are having many children and then expecting food stamps and welfare to support them, who is paying for all this?

But it doesn't stop there. Many among these illegals are involved in criminal activities, especially drug-running. Some are violent criminals, committing crimes such as rape and murder. Aren't there already too many criminals here, without importing even more?

Who could possibly benefit from such a situation? Only the elite globalists, because they are not the ones paying the price. It is We the People who pay the price, and it is exorbitant beyond any standards of justice.


Credo of the Muslim Brotherhood, which has orchestrated attacks and spawned numerous subsidiary terrorist organizations:

Allah is our objective, the Quran is our Constitution, the Prophet is our leader, Jihad is our way, and death for the sake of Allah is the highest of our aspirations.”

Hafiz Mohammad Saeed, the leader of the Lashkar-e-Toiba terrorist organization:
The notion of the sovereignty of the people is anti-Islamic. Only Allah is sovereign.”

Ayatollah Khomeini:

Mehrab (a mosque) means a place of war, a place of fighting. Out of the mosques, wars should proceed. Just as all the wars of Islam proceeded out of the mosques. The prophet had a sword to kill people. Our Holy Imams were quite militant. All of them were warriors. They used to wield swords. They used to kill people. We need a Caliph who would chop hands, cut throats, stone people. In the way that the messenger of Allah used to chop hands, cut throats, and stone people.”

The co-founder of CAIR, Omar Ahmad (1998), secretly recorded at an Islamic conference in Fremont, California:

"Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith but to become dominant. The Koran should be the highest authority in America and Islam the only accepted religion."

Just in case you didn't get that last one, read it again. “Islam the only accepted religion”.

Which means, according to Mr. Omar Ahmad of CAIR (part of the terrorist organization, Hamas) that if you are a Christian, or a Jew, or of any other faith, you will be forced to convert, or once they take over, you will be under the domination of these loathsome tyrants, who will most likely kill you and your family if you don't comply!

Islamist Jihad. A mosque as a “place of war”. A culture of violence and conquest. Stoning, cutting throats, killing, maiming, destroying. Subjugating all nations, all peoples. As they have done for 1400 years. As they are doing right at this very moment, driving entire populations out of Europe and Asia to escape the reign of Islamic terror.

And what of their horrendous treatment of women? Absolute male supremacism, Purdah, genital mutilation, forced servitude, polygamy, “honor killings”?

The spokesmen for Islam (Jihadis who wear expensive suits), many of whom have been installed inside the halls of power in Washington D.C., make false claims that Islam is “a religion of peace”.

Do these advocates of Islam sound peaceful? Will they live and let live, in any country? Or, according to the will of their “god”, Allah, are they required, as a duty, to wage continual warfare against the infidel, the kafir? (For most of those reading this, that would be you.)

Remember, according to Shari'a, these activities are “lawful”.

And what about their very large, arguably “dominant” presence in the U.N.?

The Cairo Declaration. On August 5, 1990, the 19th Islamic Conference of Foreign Ministers adopted the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam (CDHRI). The CDHRI is very precise: according to the official English version, "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Shari‘a," (article 24) and "The Islamic Shari‘a is the only source of reference for the explanation or clarification of any of the articles of this Declaration" (article 25). In other words, by establishing Shari`a law as "the only source of reference" for the protection of human rights in Islamic countries, the Cairo Declaration gives it supremacy over the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.”

The U.N. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, as exposed in PART ONE of this report, is antithetical to the U.S. Constitution and the unalienable rights of the individual. As is Shari'a law, an inextricable component of Islam.

So why would anyone be foolish enough to allow their unalienable rights to be compromised, modified, adulterated by either of these vile political establishments? Islam may be claimed by its adherents as a “religion”, but in fact it is a totalitarian political system. Just like the United Nations.

Such a system does not belong here, not in these united States.

What's more, the First Amendment of the Constitution does not “protect” the practice of any “religion”, the tenets of which violate the unalienable rights of individuals. Shari'a law is not only violative, but criminal, at least in this country.

Here, an excerpt from an article in The Washington Times:

The United Nations wants to criminalize religious heresy, provided that those making the claim are Islamists.

Later this month, the United Nations General Assembly will vote on the nonbinding Defamation of Religions Resolution, which would give international sanction to the type of religious persecution commonplace in Muslim-majority countries. Superficially, the resolution contains feel-good human rights language routinely churned out by the U.N. The intent of this resolution, however, is to give sanction to repressive mechanisms that primarily Muslim countries use to stifle critiques of their state-sanctioned sects. This lends international legitimacy to criminal penalties against people who exercise their freedom of worship.”


What about the pandemonium breaking out in cities all around the country. They may call themselves “protesters”, or “activists”, but any intelligent, discerning person, observing their actions, will know otherwise. These are riots, not peaceful protests. People have been grievously injured and deaths have resulted (how many, to date, I don't know, but it is certain the body count will rise, as these riots continue.)

Their candidate, Hillary Clinton, lost the election, and like enraged two-year-olds they are throwing temper tantrums.

These are not “grass roots” activists. Like the “Occupy” movement, they are mobs of left-wing agitators, controlled and funded from above by New World Order globalists, such as George Soros.

The mantra is exactly the same: “Tell me what democracy looks like!”, answered with: “THIS is what democracy looks like!”

And on this one point, I must say I would agree with them.

THIS --angry , violent mobs, throwing rocks at police, burning vehicles, blocking traffic, threatening law-abiding citizens, thuggery, destruction of government and private property, assaults against their adversaries (those who believe in the Rule of Law and defend the Constitution, whether or not they “support” Donald Trump)-- yes indeed, this is what they are trying to impose on the rest of us.

Democracy is mob rule, rule by the changing whims of the majority, no matter how vile their objectives, no matter how unjust, in many cases, downright stupid.

But the mobs of left-wing agitators are never in control, regardless of what they may believe. The control comes from far above, by global elitists who run the show.

These “social justice warriors” will be heard repeating, ad nauseam, “We are all in this together”. But who is “we”? There are in fact a number of competing and incompatible agendas being promoted. So, while they may believe they are fighting for “social justice”, in their profound ignorance, they are actually fighting themselves.

They want open borders. They want socialized medicine. They want all the free stuff, government handouts for all and sundry. They want Big Brother Government, paying the freight. They demand “special rights” for any number of groups, while denying EQUAL RIGHTS for those they don't like. Individual rights? They could not care less.

They want a collectivist government at the ever-changing whims of men, while denouncing the Rule of Law.

They want the government to confiscate YOUR weapons, thus preventing you from exercising your unalienable right to self-defense. They actually seem to believe that “taking the guns away” will solve the problem of “gun violence”.

The opposite has been proven true: The only way to stop bad guys with guns, is good guys with guns.

This is not about “protesting” Donald Trump. In fact, it's not about Donald Trump at all. He is only a symbol.

And you don't have to be a Trump supporter (for the record, I am not, rather, I am a supporter of the Constitution, no matter who may be elected to the Office of President) to hate the Marxist/socialist ideology that has been encroaching into the political system, bit by bit, for the last hundred years.

The agenda driving these riots is a very aggressive push for totalitarian global government. Most of the “protesters” are merely dupes of the globalists. Take a look at some of the signs and banners under which they are marching:


Slavishly following the playbook of the globalists, the mobs claim that Donald Trump is a racist, a misogynist, a homophobe, an islamaphobe, a “hater”.

In searching for any evidence of such a mentality, I have found nothing to substantiate any of these accusations. What I have found is the usual organized network of paid provocateurs, liars-for hire and their mobs of useful idiots.

Typical of left-wing agitators, they lack facts and hard evidence, so they resort to unwarranted slurs on their adversaries. Since they cannot produce a logical argument, they go into attack mode, making wild accusations which have no basis in fact.

They are ruled by their emotions, rather than by reason or principles.

Hillary Clinton, supported not only by the hard left (and by the way, by the Muslim Brotherhood, who donated millions to her campaign), but also overwhelmingly by the mainstream media, is not only a globalist and a Marxist, she is a career criminal.

She is a serial liar, a sex predator (just like her husband), and a true “hater” of the women and children she claims to champion.

Hillary Clinton, as proven by her “deplorable” track record, is a bloodthirsty war monger.

How many innocent people (including women and children) have died as a direct result of the machinations of Hillary?

What about the mayhem and murder in Libya? (“We came, we saw, he died.”)

What about Benghazi? More lives lost, more senseless deaths, through what I can only call criminal negligence. (“What difference does it make?”)

Why has Hillary Clinton not been held accountable for her many crimes?

Why did FBI Director James Comey give her a pass, even after investigations developed prolific evidence of felony crimes? Even after some of the rank and file FBI agents protested against this miscarriage of justice.

There is voluminous documentation on the absolute corruption and criminality of Bill and Hillary Clinton. I remember when a friend of mine wrote an article, during the Clinton administration, citing the legacy of the Clintons as one of “lechery and treachery”. How very true, but most of their crimes have never even been reported or seen the light of day. Many of the witnesses have been silenced –permanently. As we used to say, some of the victims had been “arkancided”.

Even the latest “newsflash” about satanic rituals (the so-called “spirit cooking”, etc.) has been widely known for decades by those of us who have had the extreme misfortune of being targeted by the Bush/Clinton Crime Families and their CIA cronies.

That would be anyone who stood up against them, anyone who told the truth about their criminality, anyone who refused to tolerate their despicable agenda. Journalists, former FBI, CIA, Secret Service, Military, whistleblowers, patriots.

All targeted as enemies of the state, persecuted, terrorized, tortured, and in some cases, murdered.

What never ceases to amaze me is that so many people (both for, and against, Hillary) were shocked by some of the “new” revelations – and that even so, some still voted for this utterly demonic creature. And some, strangely enough, are Christians.

Anyone who wants the facts and the evidence may easily find them. But how many open scandals , for how many years, will it take for people to finally see the horrible truth? How many are even bothering to search for it?


The founders of this nation , the framers of the Constitution, created a government of the people, by the people, for the people. By the consent of the governed.

NOT a government taken over and controlled by foreign invaders.

A Constitutional Republic, under the Rule of Law.

NOT a democracy.

A government where the Supreme Law of the Land is the U.S. Constitution.

A government which requires all in its service to honor an oath, to defend the Constitution, against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

If you have not read the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, why not?

If you have not made the decision to stand up for your country, its sovereignty, and the principles on which it was founded, why not?

Will you allow your country to be taken over by those who would enslave you, who would modify, compromise, adulterate or expunge your unalienable rights?

By those who will kill you if you don't convert, comply, toe the line, toady to the oppressors, become a quisling in service to the globalists?

If you are an advocate of the United Nations, of Socialism, Marxism, Communism, of collectivism, of one world totalitarian government, do you actually expect those of us who have put our lives on the line to defend Liberty and God-given unalienable (inherent, natural) rights, as protected and guaranteed under the Constitution, for ourselves, for our children and grandchildren, to tolerate your subversive actions?


If you love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”

--Samuel Adams

Barbara Hartwell Percival
Defender of the U.S. Constitution
Enemy of the New World Order Police State
November 22, 2016