NOTICE TO READERS: PRIVATE CONSULTATIONS NOT AVAILABLE

 

Once again, I find it necessary to clarify a policy which has been clearly stated in NOTICES on my website for decades.

I do not have a public e-mail address because I do not run an interactive site. I do not wish to receive unsolicited e-mails. The readers are free to contact me by post, which they are welcome to do, as long as they respect my policies on contact.

But I really have a hard time understanding why people are writing to me by post, sending me large file folders of pages (printed and handwritten documents) in reference to their personal legal and/or psychological issues, and apparently under the false impression that these issues have anything to do with me, and/or that I would be available to offer some form of professional assistance.

Just this week I received such a package from a woman in California, saying that she reads my website, and then outlining all sorts of her own issues in detail, also naming names of people I do not know, who have nothing to do with me or my work, whom she is accusing of various crimes.

She also made personal comments with unwarranted speculation about some issues on my site which I found to be intrusive and presumptuous, as she does not know me.

What I do not understand is this: If she is reading my website (which she expressed appreciation for), then why did she not bother to read my NOTICES and disclaimers, which have always been prominently displayed right at the top of the site? Or perhaps, she just disregarded them, who knows?

See:

LEGAL NOTICE & DISCLAIMER

https://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2015/01/legal-notice-disclaimer-2015.html

EXCERPT:

"Barbara Hartwell does not offer professional services or consultations (pro bono or for compensation) to the general public. This includes offering advice, or discussions relating to legal (or other) issues of a personal or professional nature.

Barbara Hartwell does not run any organization, nor is a member of any organization which offers professional services to the general public.

The readers are asked to please NOT contact Barbara Hartwell for the purpose of requesting such advice, discussions or consultations.

Barbara Hartwell does not solicit comments, opinions, or advice from the readers of this site, nor from the general public."

************************** 

For the record, I am not an attorney, and have clearly stated in my NOTICES that nothing on my site is to be considered “legal advice”.

I am not law enforcement, nor have any connection to any government entity.

Aside from that, I DO NOT OFFER CONSULTATIONS TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC, even in areas where I am a qualified professional.

So please, please, I ask that readers respect my policies, by reading my NOTICES and abiding by them.

I do not even have time to read the material in these files, but more to the point, they have nothing whatsoever to do with me or my work as a journalist.

The content of this website is FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY, as I have stated so many, many times. The readers may make of it what they will. It is not up for discussion or questions.  

My site is a closed system, not an interactive public forum. What you see is what is available and that is all there is. It is all free and always has been. I am not paid for my work and my site is not monetized. I am grateful for donations from those who find value and wish to support my site, but donations do not “buy” my time or services.

Of course, I hope that my readers find value in my work, and that in some ways it may be helpful. But that is all I have to offer, nothing more.

So, please take the time to read my NOTICES before contacting me.

Thank you for your consideration.

Barbara Hartwell

October 20, 2026

 

NOTE: I should add that I understand that most people who have a website or podcast do interact/engage with others in their audience, or on social media, which has now taken over the Internet. I do not use social media, but I have no criticism of them for that, it is not my business.  I just don't share their ways of being on the Internet, and that is fine too. 

 

I think that many people simply assume (falsely) that everyone is like them, seeking networking with others, one big free-for-all where anything goes. Not for me, though, which is my prerogative.

TIME TO STAND UP AGAINST JEW-HATERS RUN AMOK

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PHOTO OF JEW-HATER PUNK COURTESY OF CHRISTIAN COLLEGE STUDENT

 

 

"The persecution of the Jews is not the concern of the Jews alone, it is also a Christian concern. There is no such thing as anti-Semitism as such. To be anti-Semitic is also to be anti-Christian. We must look upon the persecution of Jews and Christians today not as separate, unrelated cause, but involving one another in some way because both are related to God."

 

-Bishop Fulton Sheen

 

 

I thought I had seen it all. I was wrong. I thought it was bad thirty years ago, but it's so much worse now. I'm talking about the Jew-haters running amok.

They are everywhere, they are coming out of the woodwork. Not just the leftists and their enablers at the U.N. Not just sects of the fundamentalist “Christians”, who promote the idiocy of the “dual seedline”, with claims that Jews are “the spawn of Satan”. Not just the “Christian Identity” freaks, KKK, White Nationalists, “Christian Nationalists”.

Now, we see the Jihadis who have infiltrated the government, making alliances with the woke left. We see those claiming to be “conservative” flipping from real traditional conservative values and caving to the toxic Jew-hater trends, perhaps in order to maintain their “fan base”, rather than stand up for the truth.

We see more and more podcasters brazenly touting their white-hot hatred of Jews, as if this mindset were the most natural thing in the world.

 

And perhaps worst of all, we see large groups of college students jumping on the Jew-hater bandwagon, having been indoctrinated with toxic Jew-hater propaganda by their woke leftist professors.

I have reached the point where I must take the hardest of hard lines against these Jew-haters. And one effective way I have found to do that is to continue naming them. Naming them and shaming them. And boycotting anyone who promotes, endorses or supports them.

ZERO TOLERANCE.

Anyone who hates Jews or associates with Jew-haters is anathema to me. There is NO EXCUSE.

This is a national disgrace! If you are a Jew-hater you are NOT a patriot, you are NOT a Christian, you are NOT a conservative, no matter what you may claim. You are a hypocrite and a fraud. You are downright anti-American. Shame on you!

I am only one person, but I make it a mission to speak about this issue to as many people as possible, as well as writing reports and promoting broadcasts hosted by those persons of integrity, with the moral courage to speak the truth about what is really happening, and why. Who identify the real villains, who provide facts and historical context on the issue.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AMI KOZAK 

 

Here are two podcasts from one of my favorite talk hosts, Ami Kozak, addressing these issues.

Following that, I have given links to three of my reports exposing Jew-haters, each of which stresses the importance of NAMING THEM. NAMING AND SHAMING. Lists of names are given, lists to which I unfortunately find it necessary to add on a regular basis.

 

And for those who are wondering, here is my policy and the standards by which a person is qualified as a Jew-hater:

 

Anyone who publicly promotes hatred of "The Jews", or makes unfounded accusations against others, simply because they are Jews.

 

Anyone who publicly promotes,  supports or endorses Jew-haters, even if they have not made their own such public statements. They are aiding and abetting the evildoers, they are accomplices, and thereby deserve to be named.

 

The issue for me is the word PUBLIC. I do not include individuals who have not publicly taken part with Jew-haters. But if and when they go public, I will immediately add their names to the Jew-haters list. 

 

If you are a decent, honorable person, whose values are based on moral absolutes, please share these videos and take a public stand against this monstrous evil. 

 

Time to stand up against Jew-haters run amok! 

You may never know how many lives you have helped to save, but be assured, God does.

Barbara Hartwell

October 10, 2026

 

 Ami Kozak

October 7, Three Years Later

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BigvHIlk-Pk

I Got Called a Shill and I Have Thoughts

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EufUv5a_4y4

SEE THESE REPORTS FOR NAMES OF JEW-HATERS

COMPENDIUM OF UNREPENTANT JEW-HATERS: BEWARE WHOM YOU PROMOTE, SUPPORT, ENDORSE

https://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2026/07/compendium-of-unrepentant-jew-haters.html

JEW-HATERS: NAME THEM, SHAME THEM, SHUN THEM & COME OUT FROM AMONG THEM!

https://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2026/06/jew-haters-name-them-shame-them-shun.html

GALLERY OF DISGRACEFUL, WICKED JEW-HATERS: THE NO-GOOD, THE BAD, THE UGLY, THE NOTORIOUS & THE OBSCURE

https://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2025/11/gallery-of-disgraceful-wicked-jew.html

ON THE DEATH PENALTY

This is an issue on which I have always had strong views. I am against the death penalty and I will explain my reasons.

But before I do, I should make it clear that I have an absolute hatred for evil, and that I am outraged by any form of injustice. In keeping with my views, I have been an activist for my entire adult life.

I have protested so many forms of injustice over the years, I have lost count. I have marched on Washington for various issues and have been arrested for my efforts.

I have also been the victim of more injustices than most people could even imagine, mostly at the hands of the U.S. Government (specifically CIA).

As a government whistleblower, and as a journalist, I have been exposing injustices and corruption for decades.

When it comes to injustices, I am a “zero tolerance” type individual. I am a hard-line, law-and-order conservative.

I have been accused many times of being overly “harsh” in my writings and broadcasts, when exposing criminals and assorted evildoers.

During the 1980s I worked as a press representative for a New York chapter of Amnesty International. We wrote letters to foreign despots in efforts to free unjustly held prisoners. As a journalist, my job was to raise public awareness of the atrocities. Some of our group believed in the death penalty, some (including me) did not.

The way I see things, the bad guys (I mean the truly bad) need to be stopped, by any and all lawful and ethical means possible. If they are harming innocent people (especially children) or animals, they need to be taken off the streets. I don't care so much about “punishment” as I do that they are prevented from doing more harm to the innocent.

Lock them up and throw away the key! That solves the problem and protects the public from more crimes. I have no sympathy for these criminals, just to make it clear.

But why am I against the death penalty?

As a Christian, I believe that no one can escape God's justice. We will all have to stand before God. He is the judge.

Innocent people have been falsely convicted of crimes they did not commit. Some have been executed.

It deprives the person of the opportunity to repent, and to convert.

At my church I am a member of the prison ministry. We don't go to a prison. We send cards to the prisoners. And these prisoners are all on death row. All of us in the group are against the death penalty.

This was a ministry I was reluctant to join. I don't know what crimes these people committed, and didn't want to know. If they are on death row, they had to be the worst. But I asked myself, what if getting a card from a Christian, letting them know I am praying for them, might plant a seed? What if it makes a difference?

So I write the cards. It costs me nothing, I have nothing to lose.

Yes, if they are guilty of the crimes, they should remain in prison, no doubt. The only way to protect the innocent.

Recently Pope Leo stated his position on the death penalty:

"The Catholic Church has consistently taught that each human life, from the moment of conception until natural death, is sacred and deserves to be protected.” 

 

“Indeed, the right to life is the very foundation of every other human right."

"The death penalty is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person."

I could not agree more! Everything he said was what I believed long before I heard him say it. And since I am Catholic, I will follow the teachings of the Church.

Lastly, here are some podcasts from Father Stephen Imbarrato, speaking against the death penalty, for the same reasons as Pope Leo.

He has a great ministry, which is why I am a huge fan and support his work.

 

Thank you, Father Stephen! 

Father Stephen Imbarrato

 

Nidal Hasan & Christa Pike; eternal judgment and supernatural outlook! Matt Walsh is an elitist!

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-X18xfOXeQ

 

Pike's botched and Hasan's proposed public executions have exposed the true problems in the church!

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dx63C0jNb2c

 

Brutalized for thinking we should not be murdering people. Are we depraved?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLzrcE4tljU

 

I hope you will prayerfully consider what is written here. I believe that no true Christian can ethically support the death penalty and that it should be abolished.

Barbara Hartwell

October 8, 2026

A Companion Piece to HEALING FROM PTSD: Escaping the Technology Trap

 

This past summer I wrote a report, one of my more personal pieces, with ideas to help those suffering PTSD, particularly those such as myself, former intelligence professionals and/or military, law enforcement, in whose lives the incidence is high.

HEALING FROM PTSD

https://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2026/06/healing-from-ptsd.html

This report is focused on the Internet culture, social media, cell phones and technology in general, which I have found to be a major source of stress, not only in my life, but from what I have observed, in the lives of others.

I know that most people reading this will probably not share my views, but I am going to offer them anyway, even if only for some things to consider for those who feel burdened and would like to reduce the level of stress. As always, the readers may make of it what they will, and I hope it is helpful.

I do not own a “smart phone”. I have never sent a text message, nor would I know how. I have no interest in learning how to send a text. I have only an old-style flip phone, which is turned off most of the time, except when I need to use it for an emergency, or to make calls when I am not at home. I can count on one hand how many people have the number.

I do not use social media, nor have done, ever. I have no interest in social interactions with random strangers, nor in discussions, debates, arguments, personal or professional. What a waste of my valuable time!

I am not a participant in the Internet culture, which is basically a hot-bed of busybodies, all jockeying for position, all sticking their noses into other people's business, spreading unsubstantiated claims, parroting malicious gossip, and worse, libelous falsehoods which do harm to the targets of their verbal assaults.

These users of social media have voluntarily put their personal lives on display for all and sundry to peruse. They have given up all expectation of privacy. What's more, they have issued an invitation to the entire world to contact them, to comment on them, to engage with them.

Yes, I know that there are some people whose lives are an open book, there is nothing wrong with that, and that is their decision. I don't presume to criticize them, it's not my business.

What I am noticing is that most users spend many, many hours online, 'checking in' for 'notifications', eyes glued to the screen, their phones never out of sight.

The way social media is designed is that if you are not a 'member', if you do not have an account, you cannot even see what is on any of their sites. A non-user is automatically blocked and locked out. This is one way they draw you in to the system, a sort of capture, that if you don't join up with your personal information, you're not allowed to read what is published. I see this as a form of extortion, morally repugnant, and I will take no part.

So on all this, I can only speak as an outside observer. And what little I observe seems very pathological to me.

Being a very private person, and a fierce defender of my personal boundaries and private life, I have taken great pains to keep my contact information unlisted (phone and e-mail), except for my postal mailing address which I have made public, where anyone is welcome to contact me. Using the post (rather than e-mail) weeds out most of the busybodies, the curiosity seekers, the salesmen, the crazies. And saves me from the stress of fending off the hordes of haters and criminals. Having a public e-mail address (1995-2003) was a nightmare for me, one I have no wish to revisit.

I don't receive mail at a street address. That too is unlisted and private.

As an advocacy journalist, I have a public website. But it is not interactive, as I don't invite comments or questions. It is a closed system, an archive of my work, not monetized, nor influenced by any entity.

Social media is all about engagement, whereas my policy is: do not engage. Because, frankly, I am not interested in mobs of strangers invading my life. I am perfectly capable of choosing my own friends and associates, the old fashioned way, not in some virtual reality, but in the real world.

As for AI: I want nothing to do with it. I have seen videos of people I would otherwise like to watch, but if I see that it is AI, I switch it off. I find it sinister, it's just not real. And there are innocent people, like some Christian pastors whose names and work are being exploited by evil scamsters, who are making money off their theft of intellectual property. Outrageous!

As far as the cell phone goes, what I have observed of the users (which seems to be just about everyone), they are constantly checking for text messages, or sending them. And they seem to expect their own messages to be answered post haste. When they don't get a reply, I have seen them become agitated or angry with the other party. In essence, they have become slaves to a device, and to the expectations of others. They have given up agency in their own lives. I cannot imagine why anyone would want to do that. Nor can I enjoy being in the company of someone who is preoccupied with a phone, when there is a friend right there trying to have a face-to-face conversation.

When I tell people that I do not own a smart phone, that I do not send or receive text messages, they mostly seem shocked, as if there is something wrong with me for declining to be a part of their culture, the way things are done. “But everybody does it...”

Some have tried to convert me, thinking that once I realize how “convenient” it is, I will get with the program, like everyone else. They will even push the issue and say things like: Texting is easy, I can show you how.

When I bluntly tell them I DO NOT WANT TO KNOW HOW, because I have no interest in texting, it seems to boggle the mind. They just don't get it.

I tell them this: I have a landline. If you have been given the number by me, you are free to call at any time. If I am not available, I have voicemail, you can leave a message. When I don't want to be disturbed, I turn the ringer off, so you can never call at the wrong time. That is what I have to offer. If this is not good enough for you, so be it. But I will not become a screen zombie, on call 24/7, a compliant soldier in your army, to accommodate you or anyone else.

My life is not based on serving the expectations of other people, who adhere to the standards of a stress-inducing culture I find to be toxic for its intrusiveness.

I love peace and quiet. I avoid any activities which create stress. I hate crowds, noise, bright lights, ringing phones, what passes for “music”, which can't be escaped most anywhere you go. Shopping at a supermarket has become an ordeal, and I have seriously considered wearing ear protectors for the firing range, just so I can shop in peace.

I love being outdoors, walking in a natural setting. I love reading (real books, not online). I love classical music, and regularly listen to peace-inducing Gregorian chants. I love animals, and prefer their company, for so many reasons. They are mostly quiet, they don't use cell phones, they have other ways to communicate. Of course, I also love my friends, my family, my brothers and sisters in Christ (known and unknown).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MY BELOVED FELINE COMPANION, ANGEL 

 

But I don't love the culture they have adopted, and refuse to be a part of it. I have always thought the ideal place for me would be a monastery, somewhere in a beautiful natural setting, like overlooking the ocean.

God did not see fit to place me there, for whatever His reasons. But I do have some degree of choice about the nature of my environment, and the ways I want to communicate with others – or not.

The culture of the Internet, social media and cell phones seems to have taken over the world. But not my world, never my world.

Barbara Hartwell

October 2, 2026

Feast of the Guardian Angels

 

RELATED REPORT 

 

SOCIAL MEDIA, THE BEAST SYSTEM TO CONTROL, ENSLAVE & DESTROY: How COUNTERINTELLIGENCE OPS Exploit Hordes of Minions & Stooges, Gossips, Busybodies, Frauds & Liars

https://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2021/02/social-media-beast-system-to-control.html