Katherine Horton runs a website called STOP 007.
I first learned of the existence of Katherine Horton and her website when I was invited by Ramola D/Dharmaraj as a guest on her podcast, Ramola D Reports, to do a series of interviews. Horton was a member of the Techno Crime Fighters Forum, a weekly podcast which presented information on various issues related to the targeting of individuals via directed energy weaponry and other means.
In August of this year (2018) the forum ended, a result of the decision of the other members, including Ramola. I am not personally acquainted with any of the former members, including Horton, with the exception of Ramola. I will not include their names here, out of respect for their privacy. I speak strictly for myself and my purpose is to address Katherine Horton's defamation against me, in connection with her defamation against Ramola.
I should make it clear that I am not, nor have ever been involved, in any organizations or groups which address issues or conduct activism for what they call “targeted individuals”, nor am I in any way connected to what is called the “TI community”.
I am an independent investigator, intelligence analyst, journalist and government whistleblower. I do not join groups. As clearly stated in notices on this website, my reports are for INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. The readers may make of the material on this website what they will.
As brief background, I have been a political Target of retaliatory counterintelligence operations for a quarter century and have published reports on the Internet exposing numerous perpetrators by name, since 1995, as well as on radio and video podcasts.
This report specifically addresses the defamation of Barbara Hartwell by one Katherine Horton, on her website and on video podcasts, which has recently come to my attention. My purpose is to refute the false accusations with facts, of which Horton is clearly in short supply.
I had viewed a number of the podcasts of TCFF and made my own independent observations and analysis, on which I published a report on August 16, 2018.
I did watch a number of the podcasts of Techno Crime Fighters' Forum. And I did observe the behavior of Katherine Horton, on more than one occasion, as openly advocating violence against specifically named persons, such as Gina Haspel. A “bullet in the brain” was one such statement. The dropping of F-bombs accompanied these rantings.
Shortly thereafter, I published another report naming Horton, after some defamatory comments against me by one of many anonymous cowards and morons, a supporter of Horton, appeared on a You Tube podcast on Ramola's channel.
THE MOB: A Morality Tale
Fact: I do not know Katherine Horton. Anything I have said, in writing, or on video with Ramola, was based on my independent observations and analysis of a very PUBLIC issue, that being the words and actions of Horton, in calling for unlawful violence, even murder, of public figures, while ranting, dropping F-bombs.
My analysis of this behavior included what I deemed a sort of “theatrical production”. A woman hunkering down in what she described as a “bunker”, crawling under a desk, surrounded by tin foil walls, while advocating “bullets in brains”.
No, I see no “dignity”, nor “integrity” in this behavior. What I do see is that those associated with Horton will be tarred with the same brush of lawlessness, thus not in any way helping their cause, or serving the cause of justice.
Next item: Katherine Horton defames Barbara Hartwell by listing my name in a section of her website, titled:
BLOOD ON THEIR HANDS (BLACK LIST)
The criminals and people who chose to do nothing when victims begged for their help.
Horton names Barbara Hartwell in her defamatory article which makes many false accusations against Ramola D:
"Barbara Hartwell, CIA, wades in"
(link to my report on TCFF, given above)
Note the sinister and incendiary title: “BLOOD ON THEIR HANDS”
So, Horton accuses Barbara Hartwell of being CIA, apparently parroting the longstanding party-line of controlled opposition. Nothing new here. And lists me and Ramola as two of the “criminals and people who chose to do nothing when victims begged for their help.”
This is one of the most stupid statements I have seen, especially regarding Ramola, who has done more to help many people suffering from persecution than most anyone I have ever known, not only as a journalist reporting on their cases, but with material support as well. As for me, Horton has access to no information whatsoever about anything I have done – or not done. It is simply a malicious, sensationalist fabrication, in an attempt to discredit me.
Then, the most recent slander in a video podcast, titled:
Dos & Don'ts - Holocaust Working Group 2 (Stop 007)
I did not watch the entire video, which was over 4 hours long. I don't have that kind of time to waste, listening to the malicious nonsense and filth spewed by this woman. I was told of the video by Ramola, who gave me the time markers of Horton's defamatory comments. I took notes and will address Horton's defamation, which I will show to be FACT-FREE, nothing but name-calling, erroneous assumptions, wild speculation, fabrication. As usual, she drops the F-bombs liberally. Horton's comments are in quotes.
Horton begins with this statement:
"The CIA's Barbara Hartwell wades in. She is a bitch. I've never met the bitch. This woman is off her rocker. Personally I think she is a f—ing fraud, I think she is a CIA plant."
How very original...nothing that has not been promoted in a massive defamation campaign for two decades by my enemies in the intelligence community and their minions, lackeys and stooges. And for which none of them has been able to produce any evidence, ever.
"I laughed my ass off. You are against the crown corporation, my dear. Why the f--- do you have a snake, logo of the Vatican/CIA. Why the f--- do you show yourself with gangstalking sunglasses, which indicate you don't want people to see your face that well?"
FACT: I have never named any “crown corporation” in my written reports, nor in any other venue. As will become clear, Horton is putting words in my mouth, and making false statements about things I never said.
FACT: The flag displayed on my website is the Gadsden flag:
The Gadsden flag is a historical American flag with a yellow field depicting a rattlesnake coiled and ready to strike. Positioned below the rattlesnake are the words "DONT TREAD ON ME." The flag is named after American general and politician Christopher Gadsden, who designed it in 1775 during the American Revolution.
As used by me, it has absolutely nothing to do with the Vatican or CIA. Horton is clearly ignorant of the true symbolism and of American history.
As for the so-called “gangstalking sunglasses”, just another stupid, erroneous assumption. I wear sunglasses year round, due to extreme light-sensitivity of my eyes. If I wanted to hide my face, I would have no photo at all.
And don't call me “my dear”, you foul-mouthed creature, you loathsome servant of the devil.
Again, she brings up the snake, and the Vatican with another false statement:
"You claim you're suing the crown corporation?"
FACT: No, I have never made any such “claim”, about suing the “crown corporation”. Again, she is putting words in my mouth, which I never spoke, and citing claims I never made.
"Are you off your rocker? And then you are wading in ten days after this woman makes an announcement that she's trying to look in to the financial, a leading financial expert on the space-based economy and black budget. F--- don't tread on me. She deserves the Nobel prize."
FACT: I do not know the person she mentions (Catherine Austin-Fitts). There is no connection between anything I have ever said about Horton (or on any other topic) and this third party. Horton is commingling issues which are in no way related and which have nothing to do with me.
"Ten days later this woman who claims to be suing the crown corporation who has never met me adds shit to the situation. Really? Is that the most f—ing productive thing you can do if you're claiming to be against the CIA? Two days later Ramola publishes Hartwell's musings about free speech and if you should swear and advocate violence. Knowing that the whole f---ing thing wasn't about advocating violence to start with."
FACT: Once again, the false statement about a “claim”. Never have I made such a claim of any such lawsuit. Which again, has nothing to do with anything published by Ramola. And no, I do not advocate promoting lawless violence and murder against anyone, as does Katherine Horton. In my considered professional opinion she is a liability to anyone associated with her. An opinion I am free to state. I do not presume to tell anyone what they “should” be doing, nor have I ever tried to police anyone's free speech. And I “know” no such thing. From my observations, promoting violence was a major issue, as clearly stated by Ramola and others.
"Before Barbara Hartwell pulled this thing, I already had issues with her. Issues are, go to my website. All of you need to learn discernment. Do you believe Barbara Hartwell? Do you believe me? I don't care as long as you start thinking about it."
What nonsense. Now, Horton presumptuously takes on the persona of a school teacher, an instructor of all others. Considering the fact that I am not involved in her “community” of followers, it is not my concern whether or not any of them believe anything I say, nor have I ever sought their opinions.
Next, typically, Horton brings up former FBI chief Ted Gunderson, a known former colleague, and later, adversary of Barbara Hartwell. And, as I will make very clear by stating the actual FACTS, Horton knows nothing about Gunderson, just as she knows nothing about Barbara Hartwell.
She cites the “high profile affidavit” of Ted Gunderson, published on her website and a number of others.
"Ted Gunderson, who was murdered in 2011. In fact he was murdered in such a way, his personal physician said he saw Gunderson being murdered over a period of 8 years, where he was poisoned with arsenic."
Now, Horton parrots the “murder” plot, which has been all over the Internet since 2011. I have not seen any evidence from any trustworthy source, such that I would believe that Gunderson was murdered. He was nearly 83 years old at the time of his death, and was being treated for cancer. But I have certainly seen all kinds of conspiracy theories promoted by some very UNtrustworthy sources, the same minions and stooges of Gunderson who have carried out his dirty work of stalking, threatening, libeling/slandering Targets of Gunderson's COINTELPRO. Including Barbara Hartwell. What a coincidence.
And then, Horton makes this statement:
"The man who was in line to become director of the FBI was poisoned by the FBI."
Horton does not know what the hell she is talking about. But for those interested, here are some FACTS.
Ted Gunderson retired from the FBI in 1979. Before his retirement, he was considered as a possible candidate for Director, but the position went to William Webster. Gunderson retired from the FBI nearly FORTY YEARS AGO. At the time of the supposed “poisoning”, even if it began in 2003, 8 years before 2011, when he died, he was certainly NOT “in line” to be Director of the FBI. This is a FACT anyone can easily check from the public record and Gunderson's FBI file.
Then, she further states:
"Ted Gunderson blew the whistle on pedophiles, pedophilia, satanic pedophile rings, satanic ritual sacrifice, the mass theft of children by none other than the FBI. Special Agent in Charge, in line to be the next director of the FBI. Then the FBI poisoned him. Why would someone who is in line to be Director of the FBI shoot his entire career prospects? He knows how COINTELPRO works. FBI cointel annihilates entire social circles."
FACT: By the time Gunderson began publicly discussing any of these issues, he was already OUT of the FBI. Again, he was NOT “in line” to be Director. As far as COINTELPRO, Gunderson was Hoover's right hand man, the COINTELPRO Kingpin. Of course he knows how it works. He continued as a perpetrator of counterintelligence operations for decades after he retired. Gunderson was no whistleblower. He in fact ran containment operations to neutralize genuine whistleblowers, former military and intelligence professionals.
Horton rambles on, showing her profound ignorance.
Again, she continues to repeat the falsehood that Gunderson was “in line” to be director of the FBI.
"Why would somebody who is in line to be head of the FBI do all this to get himself killed, if he weren't genuinely shocked? If Gunderson was just a crook, like Hartwell likes to say, you could be a crook for free. If he hadn't done that he would have been the next director of the FBI."
FACT: I first met Ted Gunderson in 1997, when he was planted on me. I got to know him very well. I worked with him for three years before I broke off my association with him, for cause. I have done my own thorough investigations of Gunderson's criminal activities, which I have exposed, on this website and in other venues, since 2000.
Katherine Horton is a pretentious poseur, who makes claims which cannot be verified, just shooting off her mouth about issues of which she knows nothing, which only exposes her ignorance. She did not know Gunderson, nor has she presented any facts. She has only parroted the Gunderson COINTELPRO party-line promoted by his minions and stooges.
It's all been said hundreds of times, by hundreds of belligerent ignoramuses, of which she is only one of the latest.
"How exactly does the evidence stack up with what Barbara Hartwell is saying, because in my reading it doesn't stack up. Not the f--- at all. Harebrained shit that I don't know what. This is just the facts."
Facts? What facts are those? Horton does a great job of managing to be FACT-FREE, while claiming to know things for which she can provide no evidence.
Then she comes out with this, about how she knows the “facts”:
"Female intution otherwise known as deductive reasoning...inductive reasoning...whatever."
FACT: “Female intuition” is a vague concept which is not based on logic and which cannot be proven, and has nothing to do with deductive reasoning.
Deductive reasoning is a logical process in which a conclusion is based on the concordance of multiple premises that are generally assumed to be true.
And more than that I won't bother to say, except that maybe Horton could benefit from taking a course in logic, which it appears plays no role in her thinking processes.
"What that tells me about Barbara Hartwell when I hear her voice and just close my eyes it just sounds like f---ing lies to me personally. My personal assessment of this is I don't believe her f—ing fake cough. I don't believe a single word this woman says."
Well, bully for you, Katherine Horton. Your "female intuition" must be in overdrive. What kind of person would ridicule someone's medical condition calling it a "fake"? Your little gaggle of followers, I'm sure, will hang on every word you say, despite the fact that you can furnish not a scintilla of evidence, for the simple reason that none exists.
Horton then adds this:
"I never mentioned Barbara Hartwell once. I respect her right to put her view out there. I applaud Ramola for bringing it to the fore, this way I could decide if Barbara Hartwell is a fraud. It reassured me to put Ted Gunderson's work out there. I'm all for collection of data, I'm in favor of having Barbara Hartwell on so we can all decide."
Apparently, Horton, in her arrogance, believes that Barbara Hartwell is on trial and will be convicted in the court of public opinion, as she expresses her fraudulent and insincere sentiments regarding Ramola.
"Her facts are bullshit. The fact she's talking sounds like one hundred percent lying and fakeness."
So, she talks about “facts”, while presenting not one verifiable fact in her tirade of invective against Barbara Hartwell.
"Just happens to have cartel signalling that meets you when you go to her website. Somebody who fights the CIA having been in CIA, knowing their internal coded language, you would not put the image of a snake with the tagline Don't tread on Me. So nothing makes any f—ing sense."
Cartel signalling! Coded language! And snakes! And she actually thinks she knows what someone would put on a website, and why. No, I'm sure it makes no f--ing sense to Katherine Horton. With every word she speaks she reveals her profound ignorance, along with her malice.
"This is evidence that people should take whatever she says with a pinch of salt or pepper."
What evidence? Katherine Horton has provided no evidence whatsoever, only easily refutable defamatory falsehoods.
In summary, I can only say that from my observations, Katherine Horton is running a theatrical production for the purpose of propagandizing those persons foolish enough to follow along on the road to the death and destruction she advocates. And she solicits money for her "cause", as advertised, putting "bullets in brains".
If she is in fact some sort of operative (as some have suggested), those who have hired her have made a poor choice indeed, and must be desperate for cheap labor. She behaves like a rank amateur, even in her theatrics, and especially in showing her ignorance of real counterintelligence operations and those who run them.
Katherine Horton: FACT-FREE and evidently proud of it. By her fruits shall you know her.
November 23, 2018
PS: DON'T TREAD ON ME
From The Every Day Concerned Citizen
Joint Public Cease and Desist Notice to Dr. Katherine Horton
In light of Dr. Katherine Horton‘s recent inflammatory, defamatory, and libelous online publication