I first came into contact with Ramola D/Dharmaraj in late March of this year, when she invited me to be interviewed on her podcast, Ramola D Reports.
I was introduced to Ramola by FBI whistleblower, Geral Sosbee, whom I have known as a personal friend and professional colleague since 2001 and with whom I have had a close working relationship in exposing and standing up against FBI/CIA massive criminality/corruption.
(See the many reports on this site written by Geral Sosbee, some of which we co-authored.)
As one of many in the multi-pronged assaults by counterintelligence operations (FBI, CIA inter alia), we have reported on the deployment of directed energy weaponry (DEW), otherwise described variously as “anti-personnel”, “non-lethal” (a misnomer!), “electro-magnetic”, etc. etc.
I should state that science/technology is not one of my areas of expertise (far from it), but that, as a journalist, I have been investigating/reporting on this technology since the 1980s. My interest has been compelling, for the simple reason that it had been used against me (as well as my family, friends and colleagues), in my case since early childhood, as part of the horrors perpetrated by CIA via MK Ultra.
However, I do have expertise in other areas, especially, for the purpose of the issues covered here, psychological operations, counterintelligence, which are comprised of a wide range of disciplines.
I have, since April of this year, been working on an ongoing series of podcasts with Ramola, covering these issues, which include discussions of my personal experiences regarding this weaponry.
Ramola, as she states, has done intensive investigations on this technology and has interviewed numerous professionals, some of whom are scientists with expertise in this field. Her own knowledge of this weaponry, and its applications, is impressive and she also holds a degree in physics.
And equally important is that she works not only to expose the technology to the general public, but also to provide assistance to those who have been targeted for brutal abuse by it, including journalists, whistleblowers and activists.
Since getting to know her I have come to have tremendous respect and admiration, not only for her professional work, but for her as a person of honesty and integrity.
All that said, I feel it to be a moral imperative to stand with her on several issues which have been raised, most recently her involvement in a weekly forum, Techno Crime Fighters, which ended in July of this year.
I must state for the record that I speak strictly for myself, based on my own observations regarding this public issue. I have not had any involvement whatsoever in this group, nor am I personally acquainted with any of the former members, with the exception of Ramola.
However, my name has repeatedly been publicly dragged into this controversy, despite the fact that I had no direct involvement. Appearing as a guest on Ramola's podcast in a series of interviews is in no way related to her involvement in any groups (including JIT or Techno Crime Fighters).
Nor have I ever been involved with any groups or organizations of those who describe themselves as “targeted individuals” (TIs). I have often seen references to what has been described in broad terms as “the TI community”. Again, I am not involved, nor have any contact with these collectives.
I have made it very clear, by notices on this website, going back many years, that any/all reports I make (written or on radio/TV/podcasts, etc.) are FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. The reading/listening audience may make of my reports what they will.
I do not solicit comments from the public, nor do I engage in public discussions, arguments or debates. I am not a participant in social media, discussion groups, etc.
In my view (which I fully understand is far from the norm), the Internet is a hotbed of aggressive busybodies; it is a free-for-all, where anything goes, where the privacy and personal boundaries of individuals are grossly disrespected. It is certainly a function of the Surveillance State.
In particular, some of the people in the “comments” section of the You Tube videos I have done with Ramola have been slinging my name around, drawing false conclusions, making erroneous suppositions and unwarranted assumptions and engaging in rank speculation, based on nothing more than their subjective perceptions and personal biases.
Worse, my name has now been dragged through the mud in connection to Ramola's podcasts addressing the end of Techno Crime Fighters. I don't blame Ramola. She is not responsible for the smears of ignorant and malicious people, most of whom are anonymous cowards, hiding behind silly screen names.
And more specifically, Ramola has been the Target of accusations which have no basis in fact, along with hideous threats, including of an obscene nature, such that she should be brutally raped! This appalling behavior reflects severe psychopathology, and has nothing to do with the actual issues addressed in Ramola's reports.
Here I have given links to a written report by Ramola, along with an accompanying podcast. I have taken excerpts from the written report, which I have found to be especially significant, followed by my own commentary.
But for a comprehensive view, please read the entire report and watch the podcast.
The End of Techno Crime Fighters Forum: The Real Backstory
"One of the larger issues concerning all 3 of us—all through the past year–was her use of a highly unsettling language of violence that had for a long time put us and many reporting viewers—including prominent government whistleblowers and TI (“Targeted Individual”) activists–on edge: the habit she had fallen into of calling for bullets through brains, or putting people in crosshairs, or suggesting people take shotguns into places of work (the NSA, to be precise) and blow brains off, or calling for the military to take people out, people in fact that were named, often titular heads of Intel – these references to violence and occasional calls to violence, however theoretical, or rhetorical, all offered variously in jest, indignation, or to mere dramatic effect."
"This, I should clarify, and underline, was quite separate and different from the death penalty she advocated and Karen supported, as a just and legal means of dealing with Deep State Intel and military crooks who are currently openly torturing millions in their own homes with “Surveillance” or Military electromagnetic and acoustic weapons, and calling reporting victims delusional and schizoid when they report it—supported by the Propaganda & Deceit Brigade of Mainstream Media, as well as the Deceit & Authoritarianism of Collusive Psychiatry. While Millicent and I do not support the death penalty and have said so, Karen and Katherine do support the death penalty and have said so. No-one was censored for a difference in opinion; we have each freely aired our views on this subject, and none of us stopped the other from airing her views."
"To reiterate, this was not about the death penalty; this was talk of violence quite separate from that. Regular viewers will understand what I refer to here; others only have to go back and check our Techno videos or her own videos made at her channel which echo the same theme."
"Furthermore, there were occasions when the death penalty or the emphasis on administrative address of crime was brandished by her as an add-on or tag -on to a blasé rendition of Off-with – their-heads! which was all very humorous no doubt at first but hardly convincing as an innate appeal to legal redress alone, and increasingly distressing as yet another incident of talk we found discomfiting."
In our last historic email exchange, Millicent wrote:
"Talk of us doing ANY violence or promoting violence by anyone other than law enforcement and then only when warranted, should never be said of us. If they can go back to any Techno episodes and prove it was done, or at least that’s the way it sounded, we in America can be charged with conspiracy to commit acts of terrorism OR inciting to riot. Not to mention that State law says I have a duty as a mental health professional and a pastor to report such talk. Because of that, I cannot be part of any televised media where such talk is even jokingly suggested. We might be held accountable for the actions of others. It IS NOT alright to make such statements then say, O I WAS JOKING. A jury would not care."
...Thomas McFarlan has looked through the videos and identified a few time-markers where such statements were made:
Tech Crime Forum 66: Segment 1:33:00 – 2:00:02
Tech Crime Forum 70: Segment 1:46:41 – 1:52:00
Stop007 “Extreme Distress” video: Segments 3:15 – 18:00 / 21:50 – 26:30 / 37:33 – 39:51))
This is from a note Karen left on Facebook to similar accusations―currently flying fast and furious from the planted and paid cyber-trolls on Youtube and Facebook seeking to add to Katherine’s attempt to destroy my public name and reputation as a writer and journalist ―that I am a “plant” or “perp”:
But it is also a very specific public and defamatory attack on my integrity as a person, my cognitive and analytical skills, my discernment and thinking processes, my sovereignty as a thinking and feeling human being who just happens to be working publicly in this space as a journalist."
Now, I feel it important to speak about these issues in support of Ramola.
I did watch a number of the podcasts of Techno Crime Fighters' Forum. And I did observe the behavior of Katherine Horton, on more than one occasion, as openly advocating violence against specifically named persons, such as Gina Haspel. A “bullet in the brain” was one such statement. The dropping of F-bombs accompanied these rantings.
Personally, I do not have any problem with “swearing”, per se. I do it myself, as any friend of mine (including Ramola) could attest. I try not to do it to excess, especially on radio programs, but that is just me.
However, I do think that in what is supposed to be a professional presentation on crimes against persons, committed with impunity by government agencies, it does not enhance the credibility of the group as a whole, especially if the other members have voiced such concerns, which are apparently being disregarded.
But inciting violence and terrorism through advocating unlawful actions is quite another issue. Such talk of violent actions, outside the law, by a person in another country, not only reflects badly on those in the TCF forum who disagree, but could easily bring serious consequences to those living in this country, especially considering the fact that they have been targeted by those who are looking for any possible window of opportunity (“legal” or otherwise) to do maximum damage, including under the color of law.
Self defense, on the other hand, is an unalienable right, as protected under the Constitution.
Lastly, I find it necessary to address the issue of the accusations against Ramola, such that she is not in control of her own mind, or actions, due to interference by psychotronic weaponry. I find this to be not only insulting, but absurd.
In many hours of telephone conversations with Ramola, discussing all sorts of issues, I have never once heard anything from her which could possibly indicate such “control” being remotely wielded over her words or actions. Nor have I ever known her to be inconsistent in her stated principles, nor to make wild, unsubstantiated accusations against anyone.
Anyone who wishes to reach their own conclusions about these issues may see these links to podcasts:
Note/Techno Crime Fighters Forum
The End of Techno Crime Fighters' Forum (Stop 007)
In summary, I have addressed these public issues as a journalist making independent observations and analyses. I do not presume to speak for anyone but myself. My support of Ramola is based on shared objectives and primarily on principle. Readers, as always, may make of it what they will.
Thank you for your consideration.
August 16, 2018