Barbara Hartwell

My photo
Independent Investigator, Intelligence Analyst, Journalist. Former CIA (NOC, Psychological Operations) Black Ops Survivor. Sovereign Child of God. Minister of the Gospel of Jesus Christ (Ordained 1979, D.Div.) Exposing Government Lies, Crimes, Corruption, Conspiracies and Cover-ups.

Monday, May 16, 2016

FOR THE LOVE OF ANIMALS: Photos, Reflections & Stories




O, heavenly Father, protect and bless all things that have breath;
guard them from all evil, and let them sleep in peace.

Hear our humble prayer, O God, for our friends the animals,
especially for animals who are suffering;

for animals that are overworked, underfed and cruelly treated;
for all wistful creatures in captivity that beat their wings against bars;

for any that are hunted or lost or deserted or frightened or hungry;
for all that must be put death.

We entreat for them all Thy mercy and pity,
and for those who deal with them we ask a heart of compassion
and gentle hands and kindly words.

Make us, ourselves, to be true friends to animals,
and so to share the blessings of the merciful.


– Albert Schweitzer


I've loved animals since childhood. Not only have they been among my greatest friends and companions, they have been the focus of my activism and advocacy, ever since I was old enough to lend them my hands, and to express, not only to them, but to anyone who would listen, what was in my heart.

I decided to start this series of articles, which will be ongoing, to share my lifelong passion for those of God's creatures whom I have known, and some whom I wish I could have known.

The series will include photos, of my companion animals over a period of years, of those of my friends and family. Photos of demonstrations, protests, marches on Washington, D.C., in some of which I was arrested for my activism, though never convicted of any crime.

(Is it a crime to love animals? You certainly might think so, considering you can be arrested for defending them from abuse.)

There will be articles I have written, editorials for newspapers, periodicals and whatnot.

So I will state up front: I believe animals have rights. Not just “welfare”, as controlled and decided by human beings. I believe they have souls. Animals are vibrantly sentient creatures, they have feelings, they have a love of life, and a desire for self preservation. They think, they dream, they have various forms of intelligence that are rarely, by most human beings, even imagined. They are capable in many cases of as strong a love and loyalty as any person.

One reason that animals have not been accorded the most basic rights in most societies is that they have no 'legal' standing of “personhood”. A corporation is considered a “person”, but not an animal.

I've done all in my power to change that, and will continue until the day God sends the chariot to take me home.

I know that some of my regular readers are animal lovers and/or animal rights activists. I hope they will enjoy this series as much as I will.


Barbara Hartwell Percival
May 16, 2016


Angel

I adopted Angel in November, 2015. Friends from my church found her for me, at a vet's clinic not far from where I live.

After my beloved Kyra passed away in June, 2015, at age 15, I lived for 5 months without a companion animal, this being the longest period of time in decades when I hadn't had at least one animal living with me. My largest 'herd' of cats at one time was 9 precious feline friends, of which Kyra was the youngest.

I searched for animals in the shelters and rescue operations online, thinking it might be best to adopt an older male cat, someone who was of a sedentary nature, perhaps, a fellow senior citizen. But I didn't have the money for the adoption fee, so I waited and prayed that the right 'person' would somehow appear.

And sure enough, she did. She wasn't an older male, not a senior citizen like me, and she is anything but sedentary. But as it turned out, the perfect companion for me.

My friends sent me a photo of her which they'd taken at the vet's clinic. She was alone, the last of the kittens who needed a home. I then went to visit her at the clinic, one day after church. The first time I could only see her through the front window, as it was Sunday and the clinic was closed.

The next time I went inside and was able to speak with her. She was six months old, gorgeous, friendly and affectionate, and I could not believe that no one had adopted her. She had been there for months, no takers. She must have been waiting for me.

My friends paid the adoption fee, for all her medical needs, and gave me a generous gift certificate for food and other supplies. God bless them!

I was now the proud grandmother of a beautiful little girl. I named her Angel. Her birthday is in the month of May, now one year old.

Happy birthday, Angel.

Here she is, at 8 months old.



















Angel aka “The Hooligan”

Her motto: “My way or the highway”



FOR THE LOVE OF ANIMALS

More photos and stories to come...

Wednesday, May 11, 2016

Spotlight on Maureen Nemaizer: A Web of Lies & Weaponized Whining



I have published numerous reports exposing the offenses of Howard Nemaizer, a used car salesman (doesn't it just figure?), an extremely aggressive interloper, ambitious amateur and opportunist who is trying to make a name for himself by latching on to legitimate journalists and whistleblowers, copying and parroting the work of others.

Nemaizer is a name-dropper and gate-crasher who bulldozes his way, uninvited and unwanted, into the business of anyone he thinks he can exploit for his own self-serving ends. In short, he's an unprincipled busybody with no respect whatsoever for the privacy and personal boundaries of others. Worse, he is a malicious pathological liar, as demonstrated by the diabolical calumny he has added to the already existing massive smear campaign against Barbara Hartwell.

The smear campaign, that is the core of this entire issue, though Howard Nemaizer is only one of numerous participants attempting to ruin the reputation of Barbara Hartwell. None of the dime-a-dozen government stooges (including Nemaizer) have any truthful, factual information that could actually be a basis for even compromising my credibility, much less destroying it.

Where are the facts? Where is the evidence to back up the facts? Nowhere to be found. It simply does not exist.

These pretentious fools have nothing that could possibly comprise factual information, so they resort to parroting the lies of the government agents who designed the defamation campaign many years ago, the most prevalent of which is that I am a “CIA disinfo agent”, courtesy of FBI chief Ted Gunderson. The little squawking parrot, Nemaizer, threw that one in too, just as I knew he would, just as all the other stooges of his ilk (such as Ken Adachi, Tim White, Alex Studer, Pam Schuffert, James F. Marino, Charles Bruce Stewart, Larry Lawson, Brenda Negri...et al) have done.

But of course, it gets worse. Having nothing of substance to report, these self-appointed Town Criers, driven by spite, and often by envy of those who have the actual credentials, knowledge and experience which they lack, fabricate stories about Barbara Hartwell, and disseminate them far and wide, via their social media grapevines. 

For these scandal-mongers, malicious gossip, the more lurid the better, is the coin of the realm. This malicious gossip (which has no basis in fact) is then in turn passed on to numerous other social networks, where their fellow busybodies trumpet the libelous falsehoods. X-tra, X-tra, read all about it! BEWARE: Barbara Hartwell is an evil CIA disinfo agent....We read it on too many sites for it not to be true!

But in the case of Howard Nemaizer, the falsehoods he promotes are far more damaging, because of the unfortunate fact that for a short time (roughly a year and a half) he was actually acquainted with me and due to his dishonest nature, seized the window of opportunity to bear false witness against me, once he realized that I had zero tolerance for his exploitation and misrepresention of my name.

Add to this the misfortune that I was stranded in his house under terrible circumstances, again, due to his dishonesty, which exacerbates the situation further. That is why I find it so important to establish, for the record, that Howard Nemaizer is a malicious and unrepentant liar.

My first reports on Howard Nemaizer were published in protest of his exploitation and misrepresentation of my name and website. He took it upon himself to “tell the story” of Barbara Hartwell, promoting inaccurate information, some based on his own wild speculation, and often falsely stating that I was “one of his closest friends”, thus implying that he had “inside information”. It's not his story to tell, but these characters just can't seem to mind their own business, and leave others to tend to theirs.

As always, my reports were based on facts, backed by evidence, which I presented, in the form of Nemaizer's own written and published words, from his websites, “Howard Nema dot com” and “TRUTH TALK NEWS”. I also cited videos he had published on You Tube, where my name was grossly misrepresented and exploited, and where he published material stolen from me, in violation of a good faith verbal agreement. In the case of Howard Nemaizer, “good faith” is a concept alien to his mentality of aggression, exploitation and total disrespect for the personal boundaries, the privacy and the property of others.

Despite my initial polite request that he remove the false information and fraudulent promotions in connection with the name of Barbara Hartwell, despite my subsequent demands, my warnings to cease and desist, Nemaizer arrogantly chose to disregard my protests of these offenses and left the fraudulent promotions (in one such case, by his own admission, “more than 200 posts”) on at least two websites he owns, “TRUTH TALK NEWS” (a flagrant misnomer, if ever there was one) and “Howard Nema dot com” (using a pseudonym instead of his actual name).

Nemaizer's first response to my rightful protests was to publish a defamatory notice (February 24, 2015), making false accusations and stating that he wanted to be PAID to remove the fraudulent material. That alone should suffice to show his true character as a dishonorable person and malicious liar.

But Howard Nemaizer didn't stop there. Some time later (November 9, 2015) Nemaizer published another defamatory article, chock-full of outrageous lies, libelous falsehoods, in which he added insult to injury by his monstrous invasions of my and my family's privacy.

This was a full-blown assault on Barbara Hartwell, a false narrative with no basis in fact, and for which he presented no evidence (there was no evidence), only fabrications, in his attempt to try to justify the unjustifiable, to defend the indefensible.

What exactly was he trying to defend and justify? The horrible, unprincipled way I was treated by him and his wife, and their similarly atrociously ill-mannered, low-class friends. His false pretenses, false promises in making an offer of “sanctuary” at his house, when I was in a dire emergency situation, about to lose my second home in three years, and nearly all of my possessions.

As a result of Howard Nemaizer's lies, and his fraudulent bait-and-switch offer of “sanctuary”, I was stranded for 29 days in a dark, dirty, cold, damp, mildew-and-mold-infested basement, unfit for human (or animal) habitation. Until, that is, a directive was issued by Maureen Nemaizer that I, a disabled senior citizen, utterly destitute and under persecution, must be OUT BY NOON on December 21, 2013.

All that being said, as just a bit of background information, I'll get to the point of this report, which is that unfortunately for anyone who becomes a Target of Howard Nemaizer's aggression and fraudulent schemes, there is another Nemaizer lurking in the background, pulling his strings and whining hysterically in his ear: his wife, Maureen Nemaizer. And Howard Nemaizer has nothing on his wife when it comes to being a liar, an aggressive busybody, a snoop, snitch, gossip and Town Crier of other people's personal business. I mean, she revels in such unscrupulous pursuits.

Considering the fact that Maureen Nemaizer has also published libelous falsehoods against Barbara Hartwell (which have now been spread far and wide via social media), I find it necessary to expose the facts, once again, in defense of the truth and of my honor. I will not allow the malicious lies of Maureen Nemaizer to stand unchallenged. She, like her husband, brought this exposure on herself; she has earned it and richly deserves to reap the toxic fruits of her labor.

Because I do not participate in any form of social media, I don't have access to the Facebook pages of Howard or Maureen Nemaizer. Nor would I want to waste my time slogging through their trash for more evidence of their outrageous lies. I already have more than enough of that to make a very solid case against them.

But I do know that Maureen Nemaizer posted a number of defamatory comments on her husband's website, “Howard Nema dot com”. I haven't seen them; I was alerted to this by my best friend and fellow Target of government-sponsored defamation, Geral Sosbee, who is as outraged as I am about the unscrupulous activities of both Nemaizers and the extreme damages to me.

Geral Sosbee too was driven into financial destitution and homelessness, a direct result of the FBI's campaign to neutralize him. And Geral and I are not the only ones. This same pattern of events has repeated itself time and time again, in cases of whistleblowers who refuse to back down in our stand against government corruption.

One reason I refuse to revisit Howard Nemaizer's defamatory article (once was enough) is because I was also informed by Geral that the infamous perp (stalker, blackmailer, forger, identity thief, porno-monger, etc. etc.), Todd Brendan Fahey, was engaged in his usual obsessive, filth-laden calumny against Barbara Hartwell, right there on the same page with the Nemaizers. Birds of a feather – vultures, that is.

Maureen Nemaizer called me “evil”, I do know that much. This, from a woman who attends heavy metal concerts where devil worshipers congregate, and where Bibles are burned onstage as part of the show. This, from a woman who issued the directive that a disabled senior citizen, utterly destitute and under persecution, with an elderly cat to care for, be thrown into the street in the dead of winter, and on a satanic “holiday”, no less, the winter solstice, December 21. (A coincidence?)

This, from a woman for whom lying is second nature and who expected me to become a participant in her deceptions, when she dropped the bombshell that she had fabricated a false story to tell her parents about why I was at their house on Thanksgiving.

But there's much more where that came from...

It became clear to me that Maureen Nemaizer never meant for me to be welcome in her home. Trouble was, I was never informed of this very important fact beforehand. This is because Howard Nemaizer lied to me, not only about that, but so much more. As far as it was possible to do, he misrepresented the entire situation regarding the so-called “sanctuary” he offered. And there was hell to pay, at least for me.

Not until I was already there, when it was too late to reconsider the offer of “sanctuary”, when I was stranded in that godforsaken place with all my remaining possessions, did I find out the truth. And that is when the bombshells began to drop, courtesy of Maureen Nemaizer. She played the role of “bad cop” (not difficult, I'm sure) while her husband pretended to be “good cop”.

Every bombshell that fell was dropped by her, while her husband was conveniently absent.

First, she told me that she had fabricated a story to tell her parents, who were coming for Thanksgiving dinner. My presence there as a “guest” was to be kept a secret from her parents, she said. This was news to me, like all the other “conditions” of which I was not told beforehand, but with which I was expected to comply. When I told her that her “story” (complete with many false details) was a lie, she whined, “Well, I had to tell them SOMETHING!”

I did not agree to be a part of any such deception. As far as I was concerned, it was none of Maureen Nemaizer's parents' business why I was there. And no way was I going to sit there and discuss my personal business with strangers, especially as part of her misguided scheme to trap me in her own web of lies.

But I soon learned the truth about the Nemaizers and their pathological household, where lies were the standard policy, where deception ruled, and where truth had no place to rest.

Howard and Maureen Nemaizer lived in fear of what her parents would think, and planned their activities accordingly, including the lies and coverups.

(I once watched a video of Howard Nemaizer, on “TRUTH TALK NEWS” with one of his cohorts, in which Nemaizer was bitterly complaining about his in-laws. He said, “They've been trying to control our lives for the past 20 years!” So, Nemaizer proclaims this in a public video, with apparently no concern about airing his own dirty laundry.)

From my observations, not only have the in-laws “tried” to control Howard Nemaizer's life, they have very obviously succeeded, as I witnessed firsthand.

What kind of man would live in thrall to the opinions and beliefs of his in-laws? Afraid to make a move without their approval. Fabricating lies to feed them, in fear that they would learn the truth. The same kind of man who lacks the cojones to stand up for the truth.

So instead of basing his real life on the pursuit and defense of the truth, he hosts a “virtual reality” show which he names “TRUTH TALK NEWS”. It is a facade he hides behind, while appropriating the work of others, who have actually shed blood, sweat and tears for love of the truth and in its defense. He really needs to grow a set.

But back to Maureen Nemaizer. The next bombshell she dropped was that they would have to ask permission from their landlord to have a guest staying at their house. I was told that according to their lease, there was a limit as to the number of days a guest could stay.

When I asked why I had not been informed of this very important fact beforehand, I was given no straight answer, only some vague whining that there might be a “problem”. Howard Nemaizer then tried to assure me that he was “sure” they could work something out, and not to worry. “Don't worry”, that was a phrase I heard repeatedly from Howard Nemaizer, during the course of the whole hellish ordeal. But the “worries” were always based on my accurate assessment of reality, which Nemaizer sought to minimize or negate.

Shortly thereafter, I learned that she had called the landlord to inform him that they had a guest. I was down in the dungeon (as I called it) when Maureen Nemaizer opened the door upstairs and yelled down to me: “The landlord says you can't stay here!”

This woman has some of the worst manners I had ever encountered in my life. Shouting from room to room is simply not done, not in my world.

From this point on, all hell broke loose in the Nemaizer residence. Now that it had been determined by Maureen Nemaizer that there was a “deadline” by which I must leave (which I had been very anxious to do from Day One, despite the fact that I had nowhere else to go), Maureen Nemaizer began to lay on the pressure.

The Nemaizers then tried to farm me out to some of their low-life friends, including a man who was verbally abusive to me, and who arrived at their house so drunk, he passed out cold in their driveway.

Did Maureen Nemaizer care? No, she tried to get me to agree to go and stay in this guy's basement, with no concern whatsoever for my safety. Hell would freeze over before I would even consider such an outrageous idea.

But of course, I was criticized and blamed by Maureen Nemaizer for declining this absurd proposition.

I later learned, from Howard Nemaizer, that she had been making phone calls to various organizations, seeking “charity” on my behalf, without my knowledge or consent.

At one point, she actually had the gall to suggest that I should go to a “homeless shelter”.

I was harassed, subjected to hostile interrogations and intrusive personal questions, which I declined to answer, considering the fact that my private life was none of her damn business.

Maureen Nemaizer was gossiping about me behind my back, with her parents (“God only knows what she's been telling her parents!”, shouted Howard Nemaizer at me, when he exploded with anger, blaming me for the consequences of his own lies, to me and others).

She was gossiping with the neighbors as well. The same neighbors Howard Nemaizer falsely accused me of talking to, in his smear piece of November 9, 2015, when in fact I did not know any of them, and had never spoken a word to any of them.

He claimed that the landlord forced me to leave, because I had talked to the neighbors, who informed the landlord that I was there. No, not at all, it was Maureen Nemaizer who called the landlord, as previously stated. Just another lie from Howard and Maureen Nemaizer.

Then, Maureen Nemaizer, this ignorant busybody, in her relentless offensive against me, actually tried to psychoanalyze me. I was accosted with accusations: “I think you have ISSUES!”, she screeched at me, in efforts to blame me for things she knew nothing about, and over which I had no control.

From my observations, Maureen Nemaizer is like a cheap 2-speed blender. Speed 1: whining. Speed 2: screeching. I can only imagine that speed 3 would result in a smoking melt down.

In my opinion, Maureen Nemaizer is a vacuous half-wit, a harpy and a hysterical woman afraid of her own shadow, who lives in constant fear of “what people will think”.

What will the neighbors think? What will my parents think? What will my friends on Facebook think? Oh my GOD, WHAT WILL THEY THINK!

Having no control over her own life, having allowed others to do her thinking for her, she has become a slave to the opinions of anyone and everyone who crosses her path.

Under other circumstances, I could pity her. But when this foolish woman tries to destroy my good name, when she insults my honor, when she fabricates false stories, and lies to cover her own abject cowardice, when she hurls blame at me for events which took place ONLY as a direct result of her husband's false pretenses and false promises, she can best believe I will stand up for the truth, and let the chips fall where they may.

Speaking for myself, I don't gvie a flying flip “what people think”. They can think whatever they please, as long as they don't voice their opinions in a public venue by their libelous falsehoods in connection with my name. Then, guaranteed, they'll have a serious problem.

How dare you, Maureen Nemaizer!

What will people think?

I leave that to their own discretion, their own discernment, at least for those with eyes to see, ears to hear.

By their fruits shall you know them.

Barbara Hartwell Percival
Target & Person of Interest for Busybodies, Snoops & Snitches Worldwide


Barbara Hartwell Percival
Legal Defense & Research Trust
PO Box 22
Rhinebeck, NY 12572
Barbara Hartwell Vs. CIA 

Monday, April 25, 2016

CURRICULUM VITAE: AMPLIFIED VERSION




Since I first went public as a CIA whistleblower in 1995 and put my first website online in 2000, I have not published a detailed curriculum vitae on the Internet.

Over the years, I have made references to some of the training, education, issues and circumstances listed here, usually because they were relevant to the subject matter covered in my reports.

Although this C.V. is limited in scope, it does provide information which may be of interest to my regular readers regarding my background and range of interests, and which may help them to interpret my reports with a greater depth of understanding.

Another issue of great concern to me is that for over two decades I have been the Target of a counterintelligence campaign by the U.S. Government to neutralize me, to discredit my work, everything I stand for, and ultimately, to silence me.

A large part of this neutralization campaign involves defamation, character assassination, disinformation and black propaganda. Most of the 'information' found on the Internet in connection with the name of Barbara Hartwell is blatantly false. The obvious exception is my own website, Barbara Hartwell Vs. CIA.

My name has also been grossly exploited and misrepresented by those media whores and opportunists employing sensationalism for self-serving ends. They have pilfered, poached and scavenged from the information I have exposed, twisted it beyond recognition, engaged in identity theft, forgery and plagiarism. It has been a nightmare.

There is no way to stop these morally bankrupt vultures, I can only expose them by name and refute their lies. The truth for the record is important to me, and that is the main purpose of this website, to create and preserve an integral archive of my work in one online collection.

From my observations and experience, as both a journalist and as the subject of the 'journalism' (some professional, some not) of others, for well over three decades, there is little difference between the so-called “mainstream” media and what is now known as the “alternative” media. They are both polluted by the government's agenda of controlling the flow of information, disseminating propaganda, and their containment operations. They also run protection rackets (as criminal enterprises always do), so that anyone who refuses to be subsumed into the government-sponsored controlled opposition will be ostracized and blacklisted.

So, although the perps of this campaign have not succeeded in silencing me (not yet, anyway), they have certainly managed, using a number of carefully crafted lies (and many variations thereof), to plant the seeds of suspicion and to cast a pall of extreme negativity by promoting outrageous falsehoods in connection with my name.

By far the most prevalent falsehood is that I am a “CIA Disinfo Agent”, a lie concocted long ago by the late FBI Chief/COINTELPRO Kingpin Ted Gunderson, a former professional colleague and friend turned adversary, who implemented the largest, most organized campaign to discredit Barbara Hartwell. This, from a very real “disinfo agent”, J. Edgar Hoover's protege' and right-hand man.

(See reports on this site in which the legion of liars, shills and government minions are exposed and their falsehoods refuted.)

Then, there is the issue of privacy. Many people seem to falsely believe that just because I (or any other individuals) have a public website, because I have gone public by exposing information about my professional background and my dealings with government entities, that necessarily means every area of my life is an open book, for all and sundry to peruse. Dead wrong. Anyone who invades my privacy will find the consequences to be unpleasant, to say the least.

Again, we come back to the agenda of the government. They are running massive public indoctrination campaigns designed to inculcate the populace into accepting a total lack of privacy. 'See Something, Say Something' (Janet Napolitano). 'Total Information Awareness' (John Poindexter)....and on and on it goes...

Witness especially social media, where it seems everyone puts every last minute detail of their personal business in the street. Surveillance cameras everywhere; you can't even walk into a supermarket anymore without your presence being recorded. The government wants you to believe this is for your “security” or to ensure your “safety”. No, no, make no mistake: the government is hell bent on snooping into everyone's business, and any information they collect can be used against you, or to control you, one way or another.

The Internet itself is a hot bed of snoops and busybodies, all intent on sticking their noses into everyone's business, with no respect whatsoever for the privacy and personal boundaries of the individual. A free-for-all, no holds barred, nothing is sacred. They not only accept the lack of privacy, they embrace it! A culture comprised of snoops, snitches and busybodies. And that's just the way the government likes it.

People were shocked by revelations of NSA domestic spying? And that really comes as a surprise? Some of us have been reporting on unlawful domestic surveillance programs for decades, protesting the government's overreach and abuses of power. But lacking the large audience of mainstream media, we were hard-pressed to get this information out, we were dismissed as cranks, or “conspiracy theorists”. But the truth is, we don't need “theories” when dealing with conspiracy realities.

But just because these appalling invasions of privacy have become commonplace, even institutionalized, does this mean we must just sit back and accept them? Hell, no!

Privacy is a God-given unalienable right, and is also under constitutional protection. I am a fierce defender of the right to privacy. I am not running for public office (never have, never will); I am not employed by any person or entity, such that the general public would have the need to know, much less the right to know, information about my private business.

What I have chosen to divulge, or not to divulge, is strictly my own business, and for my own reasons.

I also must consider the privacy and personal boundaries of others, especially my relatives, in-laws, friends, colleagues. I won't ever use their names without their permission, nor compromise their security, nor endanger their safety. Far too much damage has already been done to some of these persons, only because of their association and/or relation to me.

Here is the amplified C.V. For the public record. Readers, as always, may make of it what they will.


CIA OPERATIONS


Now, regarding CIA. There are many misunderstandings among the general public regarding CIA operations. Much of what I have written, or spoken about in my reports and broadcasts may not be common knowledge, or may stretch credibility. People do not want to believe that the government would be involved in such unconscionable activities.

But anyone who looks at more than two decades of my public reports may see that the information is consistent. My documentation is based on direct personal and professional experience.

I was recruited into CIA Black Operations through a family bloodline, going back to OSS. I am a third generation intelligence professional.

As a child, I was brought into CIA MK Ultra program without my knowledge or consent. I was trained and groomed in intelligence work, to be officially utilized beginning at the age of eighteen (18). But my training began in the home at the age of three (3). It was by “proxy consent” until I reached adulthood. In those days (I was born in 1951), the “legal” age was 18, not 21.

The training continued, some of which was through formal education, and some through internal CIA programs. Many people believe that CIA operations, and the ways agents are utilized are cut-and-dried and always follow the same patterns and protocols. Nothing could be further from the truth, especially where black ops are concerned.

MK Ultra, in particular, has been the subject of tremendous disinformation and misdirection, in attempts to obscure the true nature of the operations. The “exposure” of MK Ultra by most of those claiming to be “victims”, “survivors”, or “experts”, is rife with sensationalism and lurid tales of satanism and sex slaves.

In truth, the original intent of MK Ultra was to “create the perfect spy” during the Cold War era. Nazi war criminals from an operation code named Paperclip, were instrumental in the design and implementation of the operations. The CIA-Nazi collaborations began with OSS, the precursor to CIA.

There were roughly 165 sub-projects of MK Ultra. One major sideshow being promoted by government operatives/shills (as well as ignorant people parroting the shills) is “Monarch”. Monarch was never a sub-project of MK Ultra, never a CIA operation. And yet, try conducting a search for information on MK Ultra. What you are likely to find is “Monarch”, dominating and overshadowing everything else.

It has never been my purpose in my work as a whistleblower to focus on MK Ultra, in my reports or broadcasts. The CIA operations in which I was involved throughout most of my adult life (18-43) were mostly in the category of Psychological Operations. That is a very broad field, involving many disciplines. People hear the phrase, “Psy Ops”, and immediately think the meaning is limited to propaganda campaigns and “false flag” operations. Not so. There are numerous and divergent facets to Psy Ops in any government/military entity.

MK Ultra was just one of the government operations of which I was a victim (and since 1994, a survivor) though doubtless the worst. In my opinion, stealing the lives of children, exploiting them for the government's agenda, and engaging in psychiatric abuses and torture is the ultimate evil.

And once again, for the public record (how tiresome it gets...), at no time was I involved in satanism, nor was I victim of sex abuse, nor sex slavery. I am damn sick and tired of having to repeatedly correct these stupid labels slapped on me by the liars desperate to cover their crimes, and their minions, stooges and shills. I was trained as an intelligence agent and utilized as such, under NOC. Case closed.

CIA is described as “an independent federal agency”, under the executive branch of government. But in reality, CIA often functions as a rogue agency with little oversight. Just consider the many scandalous and unlawful covert actions and operations – and these are only the ones that come to light, by leaks to the press, by whistleblowers, or by declassified documents, usually many years after the fact. Then, they try to minimize the wrongdoing and crimes, trying to justify them claiming “National Security”. There is NO JUSTIFICATION, under any legitimate legal or moral standards.

Even when certain operations are exposed, CIA will not acknowledge the truth. For example, assassinations. Not only assassinations of foreign nationals, but of U.S. Citizens. CIA, on their “official” website states that they do not sanction or perform assassinations. That is a bald faced lie. Aside from the CIA-sponsored murders which have been exposed and are common knowledge, I have personal knowledge of numerous assassinations, some of which have taken the lives of my friends, family and colleagues. Some are falsely promoted as “accidents”, death by “natural causes”, or the CIA favorite, “suicide”.

As long as they can maintain “plausible deniability”, they can (and do) get away with most anything they want, including murder. I've yet to see any real accountability as far as these criminals are concerned, and don't expect I ever will.

Then, there is torture. They call it “enhanced interrogation”. They think they can hide behind their euphemisms. Under moral absolutes, there is NO EXCUSE.

But, in all my activism (including as a journalist and whistleblower), my primary purpose is to defend Liberty and pursue Justice. To expose criminals and evildoers and put them out of business. To stand up for the God-given unalienable rights of ALL.

Another misunderstanding which is prevalent is that because a person (in this case, me) was involved in CIA operations, that was the end-all and be-all of their existence.

That is not true. I've known many people who were employed by CIA (in various capacities), who were utilized in their operations, who also worked in professions which did not necessarily involve intelligence work.

Sometimes the “outside jobs” were a cover, sometimes they were connected to the operations, in one way or another. But that does not make these careers, activities or interests any less 'real' or legitimate.

Here, I have listed some of my formal education and professional pursuits. This list is not comprehensive, and for reasons of privacy and security (mine and/or that of others) I have by necessity omitted certain information.

It should also be noted that what is given here relates to the past, not necessarily the present. I am no longer involved, for the most part, in these activities, though some are interests and pursuits which have remained with me.

Some were related to CIA operations, others not. But for those with eyes to see, this C.V. might provide insights and enhance understanding of my work, at least that is my hope.

Fine Arts Training: 
Art Students League, NYC 
School of Visual Arts, NYC

Seminary & Religious Training: 
Eastern Religions, Metaphysics & Christian

Christian Minister: Ordained 1979, D. Div. (Universalist Church)

Specializing in Pastoral Counseling

Investigator of Paranormal Phenomena (UFOs, Interdimensional Portals, Satanism, Demonic Activities, etc.)

Journalist: Radio, TV, Print

Talk Show Host, Producer: WGCH Radio, Greenwich, CT 1987- 1993

Talk Show Host, Producer: Cablevision of CT, 1988- 1994

Advocate/Activist for Animal Rights

Private Consultant for Animal Behavior: Domestic Animals, especially horses

Director: Humane Education Network, Greenwich CT, Wilton, CT
Non-profit 501 C3

Public Lectures at Schools (K-University), Clubs, Societies

Lobbying, Education, Media

State Coordinator for Connecticut: Non Hunters Rights Alliance

Wildlife in Crisis, Wildlife Rehabilitation, Weston, CT

Animal Rights Alliance, Greenwich, CT

Humane Society of the United States

Fund for Animals, NYC (President, Cleveland Amory)

Psychotherapist: Jungian Analyst, Counseling

Instructor, Lecturer

Temenos Institute, Westport, CT

Carl Jung Society, NYC

Programs for Human Development, Greenwich, CT

Associate Director: American Psychic Association, NYC

Press Representative for Amnesty International, NY State Chapter

Consultant for Legal Firms, D.A.s Offices, Police Departments (including Internal Affairs) in Criminal & Civil Investigations, Jury Selection, Missing Persons

Private Practice in Psychotherapy, Counseling

Personnel Counselor & Consultant for Corporations

Psychological Operations & Counterintelligence: Profiling, Interrogation, Debriefing, Counseling, Intelligence & Military Personnel

Lecturer on CIA Operations, Counterintelligence Operations






















 
 
 
 
 
(Banner courtesy of FBI Whistleblower, Bob Levin)



Barbara Hartwell Percival
Legal Defense & Research Trust
PO Box 22
Rhinebeck, NY 12572
Barbara Hartwell Vs. CIA 

Saturday, April 9, 2016

Letter from a Reader: Pam Schuffert, “Witch from HELL”



I received a handwritten letter, sent by post, certified mail, signature required, at my PO box, posted on this website.

Since I do not have a public e-mail address, the only way for readers to contact me is by postal mail. This has been my policy since 2003, for a number of reasons, foremost among them protecting my privacy and stopping the flood of hate mail, threats and harassing e-mail from cyber-stalkers. Also, because people in general have a tendency to disregard my clearly stated NOTICES that “this website is "for information purposes only" and “readers may make of it what they will.”

I did not recognize the name of the sender, only that the letter came from Montana. I accepted it and signed for it.

I do not know the person who sent the letter, nor do I recognize the name. I am posting the letter here for the public record. Because the sender asked that I not use her name, I am honoring her request. The fact that she took the time and trouble to send it by certified mail told me it must have been important to her.

The subject of the letter is one Pamela Schuffert. My detailed response to the letter follows.

The handwritten letter has been typed by me, an exact copy. I have not changed a word, nor any punctuation, nor corrected misspellings. The only misspelling I have changed is the name: Schuffert. It was spelled: 'Shuffert'.

X
Montana
March 21, 2016

Legal Defense & Research Trust
Box 22
Rhinebeck, NY 12572

Dear Barbara Hartwell,

I am writing to you concerning Pam Schuffert and a report that I am working with Pam Schuffert in her dirty scheme to get me back with dealings I had with her back a couple of years ago. Hell from Mt. X [sender's name] from Montana & I am so mad I seen that smear on your sight. I demand it be taken off, it is a Lie, Lie, Lie. She is a witch from HELL.

I first heard your interview with Jeremy Floyd, “The Floyd Report”. Back a couple of years when he was in Mt. I knew Jeremy. It was through BJ's A.M. Radio station. I know who you are, the story. Well, I have mine also. I'm not a spy, I do not work with her, or have anything to do with her. God help me!! She got ahold of me through somewhere, Ghost Troop I think? Which she destroyed. She said she was a reporter. I believed her of course. She moved her butt in my home. Stole my contact list -group list- tried to poisen me, destroyed my home. I had to hire a bodyguard to save me, and have a witness, whom is a x-cop. She would not leave. Finally, I had to have her removed by the police. Sorry, I am upset.

Then yesterday I hear from J. McNeil, The Micro Effect Radio, she got in there. He don't realize the damage she can do. So I e-mailed him. He had to kick her out also, because she would not leave. Then as proof I sent him your site, so he can see first hand what he is facing. So if he goes to the site, guess what he will find? Me!! It destroys my name and credibility. I did not know you would print that, why did you not research it first? I am just a person who is in this fight to save what is left of our country. A nobody. I only trust you because Jeremy did?

Pam is out there doing her thing again, I thought she would have quit by now. Surprise, surprise!!

I am asking you to please remove me from the blogspot. I do not deserve the fanfare. Please. The harm it will do, you can't imagine. Yes you can. Lies can destroy. You know!!

Sincerely,

X

RESPONSE TO X FROM BARBARA HARTWELL

First I should say that I have quite a number of reports on this site exposing Pamela Schuffert, and her M.O. (See links listed below.) Nothing stated about Pam Schuffert by the writer of this letter comes as a surprise, so I tend to believe her statements are truthful.

In fact, I have received numerous letters about the infamous Pam Schuffert over a period of years, giving testimony of the same general nature (some of which I have published), as to Schuffert's unprincipled character and unscrupulous activities. A grifter, a liar, a thief, a con artist, a stalker, a meddler, a gossip, etc. etc. No doubt she has done tremendous harm, from coast to coast in this country, as she travels from place to place, on her ludicrously misnamed “Prayer Journey” across America.

Some of her accomplices are also notorious, including career criminal/predicate felon, fed snitch Tim White, Ken Adachi (who publishes her outrageous lies about Barbara Hartwell and others). Pam Schuffert is a fed snitch, part of the crew of COINTELPRO minions and government stooges, under the direction of the late FBI Chief, Ted Gunderson.

Just the grievous harm Pam Schuffert has done to me and my family could fill volumes. I call her “The Busybody from Hell”.

Unfortunately, only one of many such individuals (Busybodies from Hell) who have contributed to destroying the reputation and livelihood of Barbara Hartwell. The best I can do is expose their offenses, criminal and civil, in defense of my good name, and as a warning to others. One reason I decided to publish this letter. Consider it another warning of the evil of Pam Schuffert.

However, I do not understand X 's demand that the “smear” be removed from my website.

"I am so mad I seen that smear on your sight. I demand it be taken off, it is a Lie, Lie, Lie. She is a witch from HELL."

Upon reading the letter, I conducted a number of searches for the writer's name, including in conjunction with Pam Schuffert. I found nothing. Then, I did an internal search of my website, Barbara Hartwell Vs, CIA, to see what, if anything, came up. Nothing.

For the internal search of Barbara Hartwell Vs. CIA, I got this:

"No posts matching the query"

I then took the time to search through my reports on Pam Schuffert, but found no such name.

So, unless/until I am able to locate the “smear” in question (assuming it exists) I am unable to remove it. Or, if X wants to send me the precise information as to how I would go about locating this "smear", assuming it is actually on my website, I would be willing to remove it. As stated, I don't recognize X's name.

"I first heard your interview with Jeremy Floyd, “The Floyd Report”. Back a couple of years when he was in Mt. I knew Jeremy. It was through BJ's A.M. Radio station. I know who you are, the story."

I was at one time a frequent guest on Jeremy Floyd's radio program (GCN), but that was many years ago (more than a decade). I have nothing but good things to say about Jeremy, especially that he stood up for me when Alex Jones tried to censor Jeremy's broadcast, pulled the plug on the show because I was exposing FBI Chief Ted Gunderson and his crony, former senator/CIA operative John DeCamp, and Jones threatened him never to have contact with Barbara Hartwell again!

Jeremy resigned from the station rather than be censored and bullied by Alex Jones.

But I've had no contact with Jeremy Floyd since that time.

As for “the story” of Barbara Hartwell, I doubt that this reader (or for that matter, most people) would know the truth or the facts about that, as evidenced by the massive defamation campaigns, ongoing for more than two decades, and the many false, fraudulent, libelous, slanderous “stories” which can be found all over the World Wide Web.

For those interested, though, the truthful, factual information may be found on this website.

"Then as proof I sent him your site, so he can see first hand what he is facing. So if he goes to the site, guess what he will find? Me!! It destroys my name and credibility. I did not know you would print that, why did you not research it first? I am just a person who is in this fight to save what is left of our country. A nobody. I only trust you because Jeremy did?"

First, I would not consider anything posted on a website (including mine) as “proof” of anything. Evidence, possibly, depending on the standards employed by the individual reader and the credibility attributed to the source (in this case, Barbara Hartwell) by that reader.

Again, X fails to name the specific information she claims I have “printed”. As for the accusation, “why did you not research it first”?, she has not specified what “it” is. I do not ever knowingly print false information. I do not even know this person. Again, if she wants to contact me and provide the specific information which she claims is posted on my site, I can see if her claim has merit. Otherwise, there is nothing I can do to assist her.

And since she does not know me, why would she have reason to trust me? Just because someone else did? No, by my standards at least, trust must be earned, not handed out indiscriminately.

For now, all I can do is state that I will be happy to honor X's request to remove anything which contains her name, again, assuming it can be located.

As for Pam Schuffert, maybe X could consider writing her own testimony (aside from what is given here), using her actual name as a witness. By my standards, any information coming from “anonymous” sources has ZERO credibility.

So, though I don't expect anyone reading this report to give credibility to the source (being anonymous by her own request), I can state that in my considered professional opinion, she is most likely providing truthful information regarding Pam Schuffert, given that her testimony is consistent with that of many other Targets/Victims of Pam Schuffert.

As always, the readers may make of it what they will.

I do welcome the testimony of witnesses regarding Pam Schuffert, or other offenders of her ilk, exposed on this website, which I will publish at my discretion if I believe the information has merit.


Barbara Hartwell Percival
Longtime Target of Libel/Slander & Monstrous Invasions of Privacy by Pam Schuffert


RELATED REPORTS


BEWARE the “Prayer Journey” of Pam Schuffert:



































 
 
 
 
PAM SCHUFFERT: THE BUSYBODY FROM HELL



Barbara Hartwell Percival
Legal Defense & Research Trust
Barbara Hartwell Vs. CIA