Barbara Hartwell

My photo
Independent Investigator, Intelligence Analyst, Journalist. Former CIA (NOC, Psychological Operations) Black Ops Survivor. Sovereign Child of God. Minister of the Gospel of Jesus Christ (Ordained 1979, D.Div.) Exposing Government Lies, Crimes, Corruption, Conspiracies and Cover-ups.

Saturday, July 9, 2011

Vigil for Erik Scott

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NOTE: Please attend this Vigil if you are able, to honor the life of Erik Scott and to show your support for the Scott Family. If it is not possible to be there, please say a special prayer from wherever you may be, hold your own candlelight vigil and/or request prayers at your church service.
 
Thank you for your consideration.
 
May the Grace and Peace of God be with you.

Barbara Hartwell Percival
July 9, 2011
 
 
Vigil For Erik Scott
 
 

http://erikbscottmemorialblog.blogspot.com/2011/07/vigil-for-erik-scott.html


 

Erik’s many friends and loyal supporters are holding a memorial vigil in Las Vegas:

 

In a private ceremony on July 10th, our family will observe the one-year anniversary of Erik’s senseless murder in front of the Summerlin Costco store in Las Vegas, NV. Time has eased the acute pain of losing our wonderful son, brother, mentor and friend, but the hole he left in each of our hearts remains.

Rest in peace, Erik.
 
 
Barbara Hartwell Percival
Legal Defense & Research Trust
Barbara Hartwell Vs. CIA 
 
















Wednesday, July 6, 2011

Cops Impliedly Authorized By New Law To ***Kill Innocent Suspects



From former FBI agent Geral Sosbee:

A new law by the US Supremely corrupt and cowardly court impliedly authorizes the killer cops (and the fbi assassins) to murder a fleeing, innocent suspect:

U.S. Justices rule fleeing police is a violent felony

 

"Risk of violence is inherent to vehicle flight," Kennedy said. "It is well known that when offenders use motor vehicles as their means of escape they create serious potential risks of physical injury to others. Flight from a law enforcement officer invites, even demands, pursuit."

 
In order to fully comprehend the disturbed and criminal minds of the cops and their fbi/cia mentors see some of the *comments of joy by cops who relish their new power to kill as authorized by the fools on the highest court. The story and all quotes below are taken from the following link:

http://forums.leoaffairs.com/viewtopic.php?f=57&t=114579#p802445

Here are representative samplings (from the above link) quoting some of the lunatics in blue who now prepare to kill innocent suspects fleeing from the *homicidal police:

"Fleeing in a vehicle IS deadly force, and should be dealt with as other deadly force situations."

"I remember back in 2005, or so, at the Brandon Town Center, when unit 100 got on the radio and said "TAKE HIM OUT" in reference to a X31 truck that was trying to get away."

Cops' threats to Geral Sosbee:

"In the mean time, don't try to flee or elude the police. It would be wrong...... and could be fatal. I'm from the government and I'm here to help you."
                              
Another insane cop threatens Geral  Sosbee, issues an unlawful order, and with the enthusiasm of a serial killer brags about executions:

"Stay in Texas and stay off our board. Texas is a great place for criminals....highest number on death row and the highest number of executions. The eyes of Texas are upon you....flee and see what happens."

Finally, the people of the United States must discover the sick and criminal minds of the police and the fbi in order to intelligently resist the  violent and murderous methods employed as SOP throughout the so-called 'law enforcement' community (i.e., the gang of thugs in the houses of the **LD).

http://sosbeevfbi.ning.com/forum/topics/americans-embrace-their

http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/statement.html

The sooner the people are educated about the out of control cops, fbi, etc., the better able we are to defend against them.

Yours Truly, 
Geral Sosbee
(956)536-0439

http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/oliverwendallhol.html

************************

 Barbara Hartwell Percival

 Legal Defense & Research Trust

Barbara Hartwell Vs. CIA      
http://www.barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com

Tuesday, July 5, 2011

CONSIDER THE SOURCE: Government Stooge Alex Studer Exposes His Own Ignorance (Again)










 
 
 
 
 
STUDER THE STOOGE
 
 
Alex Studer is one of a gaggle of government stooges who are playing into the hands of a criminal network of COINTELPRO operatives such as Ted Gunderson, John DeCamp, A. True Ott, Doug Millar et al.

Studer's website, Lab Virus, mainly promotes A. True Ott, along with the  racism, bigotry, misogyny and neo-Nazi propaganda of Ott and his cronies.   
 
Studer's sources for the libelous falsehoods about Barbara Hartwell (and others) featured on his website, leave much to be desired in the credibility department. In addition to the aforementioned criminals, they are nothing more than his fellow stooges: predicate felon, fed snitch Tim White, and his accomplice, another lowlife racist, misogynist thug, Craig Oxley (who has designated black people as "the lower races") and who, like Tim White, makes a habit of threatening people on public message boards. Studer has posted the outrageous lies fabricated by the likes of White and Oxley, at times leaving out their names, saying only that their comments on Barbara Hartwell came from "a friend".

Anyone using anonymous sources (especially sources like these) is a coward and a fool; as well, it is a practice used only by rank amateurs.  And anyone who would attribute any degree of credibility to these sources is a low-grade moron, just like Studer himself.

From what I have seen, Studer's idiocy is not only prevalent, it is limitless. In his pathetic attempts to gain attention and approval, he, like Tim White, boasts of how "informed" and knowlegable he is, all the while revealing his gross ignorance, utter lack of discernment and outright stupidity with every pronouncement he makes.

In his smear pieces attacking Barbara Hartwell, does Studer ever present any facts? No. Does he furnish even the slightest bit of evidence? Never. No, Studer's arsenal consists merely and entirely of parroted slurs, his own uninformed subjective opinions and wild speculation.

Stooges like Studer are a dime-a-dozen, and the only reason I have bothered with exposing him is because he has shown himself to be a particularly aggressive and persistent lackey and shill for government operatives who have done tremendous damage to the reputations and lives of many decent, honorable and legitimate activists, journalists and whistleblowers.

Here's the latest from this buffoon, Alex Studer, taken from his website, Lab Virus.

My comments, refuting his idiocy, are in brackets, preceded by my initials, BHP. 

http://labvirus.wordpress.com/2011/06/30/oooh-that-smell-nigerians-and-cia-operatives/

"Addressing Barbara Fart-Smell:  The only reason I know of this person Barbara Hartwell at all is through Tim White who angrily sent me email after email addressing exchanges he has had with this person, who by my observation seems to be a real-deal CIA operative disguising herself as an ex-CIA agent now-turned-a-new-leaf.  Mega-barf.  Anyone who knows anything about intel knows that once you’re in, you’re in for life; quitting the oaths taken usually results in termination.  Ask me how I know.  Duh.  OK so this chick apparently calls me a “government stooge” once again aligning me with the likes of Ted Gunderson (which I consider an honor) and calling us essentially cointelpro agents.   This after I happened upon a few posts of hers from January and March of this year where she goes off on me making all kinds of random stuff up about me.  Personally I think the attention is flattering and cute, and furthermore hilarious at the purely preposterous notions this chick has presented as to who I am and what I’m about here at this blog.  “Government stooge”: that sends me into hysterical laughter so hard I often end up on the floor.  If she had even a clue about how literally impossible that was, much less unlikely due to my true background, she’d backpedal in a chorus of recants like nobody’s business.  Yet she remains dug into her position that I’m a disinfo agent, a government stooge; once again if I’m working for anyone as anyone’s stooge, someone forgot to tell me, cuz I haven’t seen a paycheck yet.  If there’s any truth in her claims about me, then somewhere there’s a pile of government checks made out to me amounting up to something sizable enough so that I should easily be able to afford my own private island in the Pacific.  Keep talking, Barbara Fart-Smell."

[BHP: By insulting people with vulgarity, Studer displays the mindset and level of maturity of a spiteful fifth-grader. But rather than reflecting on the Target (in this case Barbara Hartwell), it reflects only on the attacker, showing his paucity of intellectual wherewithal.

"The only reason I know of this person Barbara Hartwell at all is through Tim White who angrily sent me email after email addressing exchanges he has had with this person, who by my observation seems to be a real-deal CIA operative disguising herself as an ex-CIA agent now-turned-a-new-leaf.  Mega-barf. "

[BHP: Tim White, again, of course. For Studer's edification, I don't have "exchanges" with Tim White, nor others of his ilk. I have exposed White's criminal activities (stalking, threats, harassment, etc. etc.) against myself and others and have thoroughly refuted the libelous falsehoods he has been disseminating for the past decade.

His "observation"? More like his parroting what his fellow stooges, and "sources", Tim White, Ken Adachi, Craig Oxley et al have been aggressively promoting for years. Apparently, Studer has swallowed it, hook, line and sinker.]

"Anyone who knows anything about intel knows that once you’re in, you’re in for life; quitting the oaths taken usually results in termination.  Ask me how I know.  Duh."

[BHP: The first problem with this statement is that Studer clearly does NOT know anything about "intel".  Judging from similar comments he has made, on a variety of related issues, it is plain to see (by those who DO know, myself included) that Studer's ignorance is superseded only by his boastful arrogance and presumption, claiming knowledge he does not possess. 

Again, he is merely parroting what he has heard or read, or been fed by actual intelligence agents for whom he is the stooge.]

"OK so this chick apparently calls me a “government stooge” once again aligning me with the likes of Ted Gunderson (which I consider an honor) and calling us essentially cointelpro agents."  

[BHP: I have never called Alex Studer a "cointelpro agent". He's certainly not "agent" material, which is precisely why I have called him a stooge.  Agents exploit stooges, especially those who would consider it an "honor" to be associated with them. The hero-worship of stooges like Alex Studer for the agents makes it easy to manipulate them to do the dirty work --like attacking genuine whistleblowers the government wants to neutralize.]

"This after I happened upon a few posts of hers from January and March of this year where she goes off on me making all kinds of random stuff up about me.  Personally I think the attention is flattering and cute, and furthermore hilarious at the purely preposterous notions this chick has presented as to who I am and what I’m about here at this blog."

[BHP: Any and all of my reports which expose Alex Studer are based on facts. I don't deal in fabrications, and there is nothing which could be considered "random". Rather, I address direct statements made by Studer and refute them.
Note that Studer, on the other hand, simply throws out vague assertions about Barbara Hartwell(that is, when he's not parroting his fellow stooges), but never addresses the ISSUES, nor cites the specifics thereof.

Then, there is the issue of "first blood". Studer attacked me from out of the woodwork, when I had never heard of him, simply on the say-so of Tim White, the messenger boy for Gunderson, DeCamp, Ott and others.

As I've pointed out, Studer, like all stooges, is seeking attention. His negatively inflated ego demands it, and thrives on it. He wants to be noticed! He wants to "be somebody"! (Look at me, everyone! I'm Alex Studer! I'm being attacked by a CIA agent! I must be on to something BIG to have THIS happen!....etc. etc.) Which is the only reason he would considering it "flattering" to be exposed for the fool he is. For stooges like Studer, any publicity is good publicity, since the "attention" is the whole point.]

“Government stooge”: that sends me into hysterical laughter so hard I often end up on the floor.  If she had even a clue about how literally impossible that was, much less unlikely due to my true background, she’d backpedal in a chorus of recants like nobody’s business."

[BHP: His "true background"? What exactly is Studer trying to say? And why doesn't he just come out and tell us about it?  Is he trying to suggest that he is/was some sort of "secret agent"?  Let's see your bona fides, Studer. That, or shut the hell up.

Maybe he's been hanging around Tim White too long, and has fallen prey to the delusional G-Man wannabe syndrome.

I can guaran-damn-tee that Studer has no background which could possibly qualify him for any sort of intelligence work, much less can he make the claim that it is "literally impossible" for him to be a government stooge.  In any case, try proving a negative, it can't be done.

And, FYI, Studer, don't presume to speak for me --you haven't a clue.]

"Yet she remains dug into her position that I’m a disinfo agent, a government stooge; once again if I’m working for anyone as anyone’s stooge, someone forgot to tell me, cuz I haven’t seen a paycheck yet.  If there’s any truth in her claims about me, then somewhere there’s a pile of government checks made out to me amounting up to something sizable enough so that I should easily be able to afford my own private island in the Pacific.  Keep talking, Barbara Fart-Smell."

BHP: This idiot doesn't know when to quit. Once again his foolishness and ignorance surfaces. So, he actually believes that stooges of his ilk would get a "paycheck"?  No, for these useful idiots, the protocol is dirty deeds done dirt cheap.

And again, let me make it absolutely clear that I have never called him any sort of  "agent" --that is a different animal altogether.  In any case, there isn't enough money in that sort of government work to buy a private island in the Pacific. But of course, if he knew a fraction of what he boastfully pretends to know about "intel", he'd be well aware of that.

Government stooges: By their fruits shall you know them.

Barbara Hartwell Percival
July 5, 2011

RELATED REPORTS

Lowlife Alex McGowin [Studer]: Supporter of Predicate Felon, Criminal Stalker Tim White & Accomplices
 
http://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2010/02/lowlife-alex-mcgowin-supporter-of.html

Another Case of Stooge vs. Stooge: Alex Studer and Tim White
 
http://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2011/06/another-case-of-stooge-vs-stooge-alex.html

Alex Studer Defends Criminal Conspiracy of COINTELPRO Perps, Attacks Legitimate Journalists/Whistleblowers
 
http://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2011/03/stalker-tale-of-demonic-persecution.html

Bigotry, Racism, Misogyny: By Their Evil Fruits Shall You Know Them
 
 
 
Barbara Hartwell Percival
Legal Defense & Research Trust
Barbara Hartwell Vs. CIA   

Sunday, July 3, 2011

Open Letter to John Kaminski and Related Commentary


NOTE: In my report, Jeff Rense, UFOs and the Government Propaganda Machine, I cited John Kaminski as one of the Jew-haters who accuse anyone who stands against such bigotry of being a "Zionist", whether they are Jewish, or not. I am not Jewish, but that makes no difference in the stand I have taken.
 
At the time I wrote this report (2003) I was addressing the issue of John Kaminski's communist ideology. I had called him a "Neo-Bolshevik", based on his extreme leftist writings, but at that time I was not aware that Kaminski was also such a dedicated Jew-hater. Perhaps that attitude on Kaminski's part came later, I don't know; however, I find it significant that both the Jew-haters (or any group of bigots and "haters") and the communists share the same basic premise, that INDIVIDUAL rights and liberties are to be trampled/denied with impunity, in service to an agenda which would violate the God-given, unalienable rights of EACH AND EVERY INDIVIDUAL, on behalf of the collective.
 
Collectivism is tyranny, and collectivists are totalitarians! Anyone who is not willing to stand up and fight for INDIVIDUAL rights and liberties, for ALL, no matter the race, gender, ethnicity, religion, is the enemy of freedom.
 
I am not talking about "special rights", only about equal rights, for one and all.
 
The bottom line for leftists, communists, fascists, Nazis, Bolsheviks, and any and all of those who promote bigotry against ANY group of people, thinking they have the right to deny "the full measure of Liberty" to any individual (for any reason) is that they will eventually enforce their tyranny on others at the point of a gun (or through other forms of force, coercion and violence). This is a proven fact throughout history.
 
Your Liberty, as a God-given birthright, extends as far as it can go, and ends only when you violate the rights and liberties of another.  At that point, we are entitled to exercise the right of self-defense, along with the defense of the helpless, the innocent (including children), or any who are under our protection.
 
This report may be old, but it remains relevant to the principles I defend and support, and always will.
 
Barbara Hartwell Percival
July 3, 2011
 
Open Letter to John Kaminski and Related Commentary
 
September, 2003

I have recently written two commentaries in which I offer my opinions on the writings and political ideologies expressed by John Kaminski.


These critiques, denouncing Kaminski's political ideologies and expressing my dissenting viewpoint, have been interpreted by certain RMN agents and readers as personal "attacks" or "smear" tactics.

People are certainly free to interpret my commentaries any way they choose. As far as I am concerned, those of the "herd mentality" who consider that voicing an opinion on a man's politics is tantamount to a venomous personal attack, only show their own cognitive and intellectual limitations (and in some cases blatant stupidity); and their comments do not reflect on me in the slightest.

As response to these commentaries several RMN agents posted their own comments, most notably billym [Billy Morgan], who wrote an article entitled, Methinks Ms. Hartwell Thou Dost Protest Too Much.

In his commentary, billym uses tactics which can best be described as "attacking the messenger".

In other words: Don't focus on the ACTUAL ISSUES outlined in my original articles.

Ignore the specifics; ignore the statements of fact; ignore the clearly expressed arguments and viewpoints themselves.

Instead, launch an offensive against the PERSON (Barbara Hartwell) who wrote a critical analysis of an author's (John Kaminski) work.

Make one PRIMARY false and unsubstantiated allegation --in this case, that Barbara Hartwell is trying to "silence" John Kaminski.

["Methinks she doth protest too much, as if she were on a mission to silence John or something."]

He then proceeds to repeat that allegation throughout the piece, to keep hammering on that one point, while now adding his own spin as to my purportedly nefarious motives for trying to "silence" Kaminski:

["What does Ms. Hartwell have against the coming to light of the truth about 911?"]

Another tactic used in the 'attack the messenger' ploy is to browbeat a person by aggressive and intrusive interrogation. He fires one question after another, trying to put me on the defensive, as if it were my obligation to answer to him.

AS IF, just because HE (or, for that matter, the whole herd of outraged Kaminski followers) does not understand or agree with the points I have made, I am required to defend or justify my viewpoints and give him and the readers a spoon-fed explanation, which it is implied that they, as a committee, will then pass judgment on.

A sort of inquisition: As if I am on trial for my beliefs or the stand I have taken.

I answer to no one for what I believe and what I stand for, except to God. I am nobody's good soldier. I am not a member of any "team" or committee.

As for those who choose to attack me:

If they do not UNDERSTAND my position, it is not my problem. If they do not AGREE with my position, that is their prerogative.

Then, billym has the effrontery to admonish me about what I "should" be doing:

["From the way Ms. Hartwell writes about "rights" and "freedom" one would think she would be right there at the forefront, on the battlefield, with John, demanding a full impartial investigation, and based on the information already there in great measure on the Internet, yes, the arrest of the President and his cronies."]

AS IF John Kaminski is the yardstick by which all 9-11 investigations are to be measured; and AS IF, by not snapping to!...to jump on the bandwagon with the rest of the herd following the "brave" Kaminski, I am somehow falling short of my patriotic duty.

I have been "on the battlefield" for my entire life. Anyone who knows me would find these comments ludicrous, if not pathetic. I choose my battles carefully; I fight where I believe I can win. And just because I'm a lone gun and not a "joiner" does not mean I can't be effective in my own way.

In using these tactics, billym displays the behavior of a provocateur. Since it's abundantly clear he's a rank amateur, I would surmise that he is being used, though he probably doesn't realize it, as are most of the other Kaminski advocates.

In fact, it is standard operating procedure in these COINTELPRO-style ops to exploit as many amateurs as possible; if nothing else, it's cost-effective. Why pay a professional when you've got amateurs, by the truckload, all clamoring to get into the spotlight.

As Jimmy Durante so aptly put it:

"Everybody wants to get into the act!"

Well, I have some news for billym: Next time, if you want to play this game, don't try to take on a professional. I've been up against some of the best professionals the intelligence agencies have to offer. Some of them actually trained me in psychological operations. I know how they work and I know how to fight back.

These tactics don't work on me and never will.

In short, billym and the rest of the Kaminski herd are wasting their time. But I have no intention of allowing them to provoke me into wasting any more of mine.

Another RMN agent who has repeatedly posted Kaminski's articles and who has done quite a bit of advertising for his radio appearances is White Raven.

White Raven claims that I made a "TOTALLY UNWARRANTED ASSUMPTION" when I included her in a list of RMN agents that are Kaminski advocates.

But it is not a "totally unwarranted assumption" that a RMN agent who repeatedly posts articles by a particular author is expressing some degree of advocacy for the political views and ideology expressed by that author. Why keep posting that author's work otherwise? Why advertise for him?

In any case, White Raven revealed her true position --as well as her amateurism--when she posted John Kaminski's comments about Barbara Hartwell and shortly thereafter, made another post gloating and bragging about how many "hits" Kaminski's article, "Arrest the President Now!" got --as opposed, of course-- to the paltry hit count of Barbara Hartwell's post.

As if a popularity contest were being held. As if the validity and veracity of a person's work were measured by "hit counts". Maybe that is White Raven's method of evaluation. It certainly would seem so, based on the sensationalistic headlines she uses in many of her posts, most of which are not even written by her.

And if she has something she would like to say about me, it would behoove her to express her opinion honestly, openly and directly; rather than using the passive-aggressive approach. That doesn't fly --not with me-- and does nothing to enhance her credibility.

Now, on to Mr. Kaminski himself and his comments which two RMN agents, Tylersword (Michael St. Clair) and White Raven posted on the Forum.

John Kaminski writes:

["Thanks. This was fun to read, I think.

Here's what I'd like to say to the group of Rumor Millers who have put in so much time and effort analyzing my "neo-Bolshevik" pronouncements.

Thanks to all those who think it important enough to post my pieces on Rumor Mill News. Barbara Hartwell is a small-minded, pre-programmed intellectual whore who obviously endorses savage American soldiers putting bullets in the heads of innocent Iraqi children and the U.S. government spreading fatal depleted uranium poison even among its own troops. Her nebulous style of dissembling kind of reminds me of Newt Gingrich, the Rockefeller-trained liberal who posed as a conservative ikon for the purpose of muddling all debates with meaningless rhetoric to advance the cause of "deregulation," which is in all cases a codeword for corporate theft and public irresponsibility. Hartwell's limited comprehension of the English language causes her to misinterpret humane arguments that are clear to other less-rattled people, as the RMN string sent to me clearly indicates.

It's a pity she didn't hear a thing I said because she was too busy calculating how she could convince RMN readers that she actually had something relevant to say, when it's pretty clear she didn't. My purpose in writing is simply to report on the atrocities being perpetrated in our names by a government clearly not interested in the welfare of the American people. I'm not aware that I have a particular political philosophy, but if I sound like a liberal Democrat, it's probably because I used to be one, but have long since dropped that tendency ever since I learned of the Gatekeeper syndrome http://www.questionsquestions.net/gatekeepers.html - that infects most of the left with CIA money. My friends in the Patriot movement would probably regard Hartwell as a mainstream Republican Zionist demagogue on the order to Tom Delay who would not speak the unvarnished truth about her country even if she were able to perceive it, which she clearly does not.

Somebody should tell Barbara Hartwell that the Constitution has already been destroyed by people, both Republicans and Democrats, who all sound just like her. I advise all RMN readers to scrutinize her rhetorical jingoism and buzzwords and then observe how little relevant information she brings to the debate. How's that? jk"]

Here's my reply to John Kaminski:

Dear Mr. Kaminski,

Thank you for your directness in telling the public what you think of me.

One thing I do appreciate is the blunt and direct approach, no matter what someone has to say.

As to the epithets you've chosen for me, "small-minded, pre-programmed intellectual whore" and "mainstream Republican Zionist demagogue", not to worry that you've hurt my feelings, believe me, I've been called worse. And coming from you, I take them as a compliment.

You know, I actually laughed when I first read your comments, preposterous as they are. I do have a sense of humor, even when it's at my own expense.

But I did also feel saddened, because it appears that you truly believe that I would "endorse savage American soldiers putting bullets in the heads of innocent Iraqi children and the U.S. government spreading fatal depleted uranium poison even among its own troops."

I have no idea WHY you would believe this; nor who/what your "intelligence" sources are. I have never made any statement, publicly, nor privately, that could possibly lead anyone to form such a conclusion.

But I will share with you something I DID write, taken from the archives of my website. It is a short preface to an article by Carl F. Worden, relating to what I would call the "actions other than war" in Iraq.

[Note from Babs:

When I think of the fifty (50) Marine casualties Carl mentions here, what comes to my mind is 50 soldiers, 50 INDIVIDUAL human beings whose families and loved ones will never see them again. Not in this material world, anyway. How many more of our troops will have to die before this is over?

Can the deaths of these good men and women possibly be justified, in any way shape or form?

ABSOLUTELY NOT.

At least that's the answer any spirit-filled person (no matter what their religion or lack thereof) knows to be true. I, like many others, am sick at heart at the senseless slaughter of innocents, both our own soldiers and the Iraqi civilians (many of whom, it must be remembered, are children.)

I am disgusted, beyond any disgust I have ever felt before, that these warmongers and traitors who are running this unconstitutional, illegal, inexcusable, insufferable action are receiving ANY support whatsoever from the flag-waving masses of asses that claim to be 'patriots'. It boggles my mind. It's enough to make the angels weep. I can hear them. Can you?]

So, Mr. Kaminski, I am hard pressed to understand how you arrived at the "obvious" conclusion that I would "endorse" such war crimes.

Since I don't have a lot of time today (one of my cats is having his birthday) just a few more comments I'd like to make.

First, I do not as a rule, engage in "debates". I am journalist who writes articles, which are based on my own experience, research and certain areas of professional expertise. People are free to make of them what they will.

I am not looking for followers; not looking to be a rabble rouser; nor attempting to win a popularity contest. I realize that many of my views are wildly unpopular, among various and sundry political factions --but they are nonetheless my own, and not a result of any "programming".

One of the ways that CIA and their minions have tried to discredit me, over the past ten years, since I broke out of their operations, is by claiming that I am "programmed" so nothing I say has merit.....no, it is all a result of "programming".

But programming can be undone. It can, and in my case it has, a long time ago. Through the grace of God, not by any "deprogramming" method.

Neither do I endorse or embrace any political or religious orthodoxy. Many people assume that I am a Radical Right Wing, Christian Fundamentalist Religious Zealot, not based on anything I actually SAY, but seemingly on their own preconceptions.

Simply put, I know God and I defend the Constitution, INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, natural rights as bestowed by God.

I don't need to be "told" that the Constitution has been "destroyed". Yes, some people believe it has.

Henry Hyde has said that the Constitution is no longer "relevant".

Well, it's VERY relevant from where I'm standing. I will defend my constitutional rights until the day I die, even if that means voting with the cartridge box, instead of the ballot box.

That is, if these bastards come to MY door, they'll be in for a hell of a fight.

Based on what you have written, I do think you are a communist and yes, neo-Bolshevik is the most precise way I can describe your political ideology. I hate, absolutely LOATHE, communism and all that it stands for.

But I don't hate you, Mr. Kaminski.

I don't hate people for their political views. I don't even hate the Bush Crime Family, and believe me, if you knew my family history, you would know that I have as much reason to hate them as anyone, for what they did to me personally and to my loved ones.

Let me leave you with these thoughts:

I have been to your website and read ALL the articles, though some people have assumed otherwise. You are a very talented writer. Not only that, but you seem to me to be sincere in your beliefs.

But from reading the parts of your articles which relate to your personal feelings, it seems to me you are missing the one thing in your life that could remedy the sense of hopelessness and despair that I think you often feel : GOD

I will not insult you by presuming that you don't already know God. It is not my place to decide that.

But I am praying for you, Mr. Kaminski. It is my sincere wish for you that God (whatever that may mean to you) be made REAL in your life. Not "God" as determined by any religion or its idea of God....just God, the Infinite Source of Intelligence and Love that created and sustains this universe.

In the Spirit of Liberty,

Barbara Hartwell 
September, 2003
 
 
Barbara Hartwell Percival
Legal Defense & Research Trust
Barbara Hartwell Vs. CIA     

Saturday, July 2, 2011

Jeff Rense, UFOs and the Government Propaganda Machine


 
You shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free.
 
John: 8:32
 
On June 24, Janet Phelan published an article exposing popular talk show host Jeff Rense:
 
Jeff Rense: "Hitler wasn't such a bad guy"
 
This article was posted on quite a few high-traffic websites and generated a firestorm of controversy among journalists and activists, many of whom  expressed their own views on the subject, as well as on Phelan and Rense.
 
It should be noted that this article by Janet Phelan was far from the first exposing Rense as anti-Jewish, and part of the holocaust-denier/revisionist crowd, though he has made the claim:
 
"Rense.com and the Jeff Rense Program have always been steadfastly Pro-Jewish...and Anti-Zionist, and certainly anti-Neocon, most of whom are Zionists with dual loyalty and many with dual Israeli citizenship. The following video points out in searing detail the reasons for our position and our many years of fighting for the rights of Jews and all Americans."

SOURCE: A Personal Message from Jeff Rense [link not included] 
 
A well-written piece of propaganda...but I have to look at Rense's "pro-Jewish" statement in light of the blatant hypocrisy of also stating: "Hitler wasn't such a bad guy". He can't have it both ways...
 
In searching for responses directly from Rense, I found only one (given below); and I have also not seen anything by Rense in which he denies having made that statement. In any case, I believe Janet Phelan, since I know her to be an honest person and a trustworthy source.
 
Typically, as a result of her article, Janet Phelan was targeted for personal attacks on her character. One such assailant was the old standby, predicate felon, fed snitch, Timothy Patrick White, who has been stalking, harassing, threatening, viciously libeling/slandering Janet Phelan (since 2006), among many, many others (including Barbara Hartwell and Geral Sosbee) well before that time. 
 
Tim White (aside from his "credentials" as snitch and psycho stalker), is an extremely aggressive, loudmouthed busybody who sticks his impudent nose in everyone's business (including monstrous invasions of privacy), either in "defense" of well-known people in the "patriot"/"truth" movements who are part of a COINTELPRO containment operation/protection racket; and more often, in attacks against legitimate journalists, whistleblowers and activists who are exposing the criminal COINTELPRO network and countering their disinformation with truth, facts and evidence.
 
Here is just one sample of Tim White's libelous handiwork, his e-mail to Jeff Rense, posted on a group called cia-drugs, in which he attacks Janet, stating she is "JEWISH", and makes his usual accusations against Janet's father, the late investigative journalist James Phelan, claiming that he was a "FBI/CIA SNITCH", "TRAITOR" and "LIAR".
 
Ironic, coming from the likes of Tim White, a career criminal who made a deal with corrupt feds in 2002 to get out of jail (serving only a small fraction of his four-year sentence), in exchange for becoming their snitch and barking dog, to attack, harass, threaten, stalk, libel/slander patriots, journalists, genuine whistleblowers and activists. Could anything possibly be more despicable?
 
And if Tim White is not a "TRAITOR", then we'll soon see flying pigs take wing over America.
 
SOURCE:
 
 
From: Tim White
To: Jeff Rense
Sent: Thu, June 23, 2011 11:44:01 PM
Subject: CLEAN COPY for RENSE.COM POSTING - re: LIAR JANET PHELAN'S FATHER...PHOTO of FBI/CIA SNITCH TRAITOR JAMES PHELAN and CIA CLAY SHAW
 
Janet Phelan HIT PIECE on JEFF RENSE
 
From: Tim White
To: Jeff Rense
Sent: Thu, June 23, 2011 7:26:59 PM
Subject: Fw: LOOK WHO CONTACTED ME //Fw: Janet Phelan
 
"Jeff......you ARE aware that Janet Phelan is "JEWISH" through her mother aren't you ?...and that she was born and raised in ALTON Illinois where her mother was a CLINICAL PSYCHIATRIST at THE STATE HOSPITAL ?....HELLLLO.......about when she was 3 years old(about 1958 or so) - the family moved to LONG BEACH.....and there is where I THINK James Phelan got IN BED with the CIA.....
 
Regards,

Tim White,Viet Nam Vet(USAF)
Concerned Citizen,Researcher,Investigator,Whistleblower"
 
Jeff Rense responds to Tim White (the uneducated rank amateur, touting his bogus credentials, the name-dropper who boasts: "LOOK WHO CONTACTED ME"):
 
[From: J Rense
To: Tim White
Sent: Thu, June 23, 2011 7:02:12 PM
Subject: Re: LOOK WHO CONTACTED ME //Fw: Janet Phelan
 
"Thanks, Tim....

Yeah...well, she's sure as hell working for the zionists. That's rather obvious now, too."
 
Well, aside from the fact that Tim White's information about Janet Phelan is not accurate (what else is new?), one example being that she would have been three (3) years old in 1955, NOT in 1958, White uses the word "JEWISH" as if it were some sort of brand of dishonor.
 
As for Rense's response to White, he typically accuses Janet of working for the zionists. I've been hit numerous times with these same accusations, simply for standing up against anti-Jewish propaganda from Nazi sympathizers and apologists.
 
(John Kaminski, at one time a frequent contributor to Rense's website, one of the most vicious Jew-haters, who has said, "Never trust a Jew", claiming that ALL Jews are "liars", has called Barbara Hartwell a "mainstream Republican Zionist demagogue". For the record, I have never been a Zionist, nor had any connection with Zionists, nor do I endorse any aspect of Zionism. Put that in your pipe and smoke it, you loathsome leftist bigot!)
 
 
So, Jeff Rense joins the COINTELPRO crowd exploiting Tim White, simply because White serves as the attack dog against those targeted for neutralization (in this case, Janet Phelan), at the same time he becomes the sycophant for all those "patriot celebrities" whose names he loves to drop in connection to his own. (Look at me! I'm Tim White! I know IMPORTANT PEOPLE, who send me personal messages! I'm a PLAYER!)
 
But this isn't the first time Rense has published disinformation furnished by Tim White.
 
There was one article, in which Tim White promotes completely unsubstantiated hearsay and rumor, furnished, of course, by COINTELPRO Kingpin Ted Gunderson and his crony, John DeCamp (both of whom Rense promotes and endorses), for whom Tim White has served for the past decade as a town crier, messenger boy, lackey and shill.
 
100%  CONFORMATION GANNON IS GOSCH
 
 
By the way, nobody has ever "proved" that Gannon is Gosch. There is no evidence whatsoever to support such a claim. This is just one of many examples of the lack of discernment (to say the least) exercised by Jeff Rense, as well as his willingness to promote sensationalism with no basis in fact.
 
Sensationalism sells...haven't you heard?
 
Former FBI agent/whistleblower Geral Sosbee, a mutual friend of mine and Janet Phelan's, posted these comments on his news updates:
 
Abominable statement by Jeff Rense: "Hitler wasn't such a bad guy."
 
Shame on Rense for his filthy assertion: "Hitler wasn't such a bad guy."
 
JEFF RENSE PROMOTES FALSE INFORMATION ON UFO INVESTIGATIONS
 
But let's leave the Jewish/Hitler topic and move on to other issues.  I think it's time I told my own story about Jeff Rense, one which I have not yet made public. Here it is, for the record.
 
This goes back to 1998 and the subject is UFO research. It's something I was involved in for many years, but have not spoken much on, since going public about CIA crimes and corruption (1995). For one thing, it's not a priority for me, since my primary agenda is defending Liberty and unalienable God-given rights.
 
For a number of years, beginning in 1986, I was a regular attendee at UFO conferences around the country, mostly in the Northeast.  I usually had a press pass and attended as a journalist.  I hosted/produced radio and TV shows from 1987-1994 (WGCH Radio, Greenwich, CT and Cablevision of CT, Westport) and contributed articles to several hardcopy publications.  On my TV and radio programs, I interviewed many of the top UFO researchers, witnesses and/or those who claimed to be UFO/alien abductees and "contactees". Among them were: Betty Andreasson, Betty Hill, Phil Imbrogno, John White, Fred Max, Dr. Bruce Cornet, William Moore, Whitley Streiber, Larry Warren, Bill Cooper (author of Behold a Pale Horse).
 
I also attended various meetings of UFO groups, including those sponsored by Whitley Strieber, Budd Hopkins, Harold Egeln, and from these contacts met some of the speakers/researchers at these events, including Dr. John Mack , Dr. David Jacobs, and a number of others whose names I can't remember at the moment.
 
Some of these individuals were connected to intelligence agencies, as I had been, at least during some of that time period; some were promoting government-sponsored disinformation about UFOs, aliens, etc. etc. In fact, these conferences and meetings were swarming with government agents...I won't bother naming them here, as it's not the point of this report.
 
Why was I so interested in UFOs? During the course of my life, I have had many experiences involving them and many sightings, including those described by UFO investigators as incidents of "high strangeness".
 
It is relevant to state that I was born with a wide range of  "paranormal" abilities, which I know to be God's "gifts of the Spirit" (which certain misguided  fundamentalist Christians have often called "the work of the devil"); have been trained in metaphysical disciplines/sciences (which I also taught at various institutes); and was in fact exploited by CIA for these talents (among others). I have worked as a professional clairvoyant and profiler, including assisting police departments in criminal  investigations, missing persons cases, and have also worked with D.A.'s offices, as a consultant in jury selection, as well as with defense attorneys. 
 
I gave up this line of work (at least professionally) when it began to take a toll on me emotionally and physically.  And despite the fact that I was still inside CIA during much of this time, that does not change the fact that my work was done in good faith and was instrumental in bringing criminals (including murderers and rapists) to justice and bringing  missing persons (at least those who were still alive) home to their families.
 
I did this work because I care about the victims of crimes, the missing and exploited, and because I care about seeing justice done, plain and simple. I received no remuneration from the police departments, nor asked for any payment. I did not want "credit" for my work, since in many cases it could have compromised my safety.
 
But getting back to the issue of UFOs and the connection to Jeff Rense. From 1994 to 1998, I was engaged in intensive field investigations in an area which is a hotbed of UFO/paranormal activity, in Pine Bush, NY, located in the Shawangunk mountain range, also near the Catskills.
 
I was working at various times with several other investigators, including Dr. Bruce Cornet, former USAF Larry Warren (Bentwaters, Rendlesham Forest) as well as a private investigator and technical surveillance expert (who shall remain nameless). I went out night after night into the field, tracking UFO activity, as well as documenting the paranormal activity connected to it.
 
There was a joint facility (FBI/CIA/Air Force Blue Beret, etc.) at a so-called "defunct" military base located in Pine Bush, NY. There was an underground base there, from which military signals were emanating; as well as "force fields"; anti-gravity technology; cloaking devices used by the military; directed energy anti-personnel weaponry, and much, much more. All of which I directly witnessed/experienced.
 
I and my colleagues were able to document these activities using various technologies, including spectrum analyzers, magnetometers and infrared photography. (I am not a technical expert, but my associates were. My area of expertise, as relates to these investigations, is paranormal phenomena.) We also were able to connect much of the goings-on in Pine Bush, NY directly to U.S. government black operations (in some of which I had been previously involved before breaking out of CIA).
 
In 1994, after years of battling the forces of darkness and my CIA handlers, I finally broke out of these operations, through the Grace of God, as I have often stated for the record. It was at this time that I began my investigations in Pine Bush, NY. I also moved from Connecticut to that area in 1994.
 
There was a local UFO group in Pine Bush, a sort of  "support group" for people who had UFO experiences. I attended some of the meetings as part of my investigations, and interviewed some of the people, but was not a "member" of this group per se. The group was not run by professionals in any discipline, but was just a gathering of people interested in various UFO/paranormal  phenomena, though the group often invited professional investigators as speakers. I myself had been a speaker there in my professional capacity, but my investigations were conducted independently, with no connection to this group. This is an important point, as will become clear.
 
The Pine Bush UFO group gained notoriety simply because it was "the only game in town" in an area which was a notable hotbed of UFO and related phenomena, which had been happening, and which had been documented by various investigators, over a period of many years.
 
During this time, I was a guest on many radio programs in relation to my investigations in Pine Bush and elsewhere. There were also some TV programs, including Strange Universe.
 
At that time, I was being harassed by the government (as I had been for some years prior, even before breaking out of CIA operations). The reason seemed to me pretty simple: I was investigating and exposing information which the government wanted kept under wraps, including as related to their mind control operations and the connection to the paranormal and UFO phenomena.
 
Every time I went on some radio or TV show, I noticed that most of my testimony, which always connected government/military black operations to UFOs, got cut, while those talking about being "UFO abductees" along with their New Age ideology, mostly the 'benevolent space brother' aspect, were promoted.
 
It happened time and time again, and meanwhile I was being harassed and threatened by the government.
 
In 1997, I was invited to speak at the Global Sciences Congress in Denver Colorado, which was the first major speaking engagement I had since going public re my CIA background.
 
On September 15, 1997, there was an extreme episode of harassment directed against me, which I knew was connected to the fact that I had exposed some information at the conference in Denver only a few weeks before. This sort of "crime and punishment" scenario repeated itself over and over. Each time I did something the government didn't like, they would "punish" me for my "crime" of exposing their black operations by taking extreme measures in attempts to intimidate and silence me.  In each case, despite the damages to me, their attempts failed.
 
In this particular case, what they did was deploy a F-15 fighter jet to buzz directly over the roof of a house where I was temporarily staying, as I was forced to leave another place due to threats to my life. The house happened to be the home of someone from the Pine Bush UFO group, who at the time, was a friend.
 
We contacted the FAA in the Albany office and reported that this was an outrageous violation of FAA regs, and that I also considered it a threat against my person.
 
Long story short, one man at FAA tried to investigate, but his investigation was cut short. However, I did manage to find out a few facts: The jet was identified as a F-15 military fighter jet; it had been spotted by witnesses over West Point (not far from where I was staying), flying too low for radar; that it was a violation of FAA regs (duh).
 
But the man who tried to help was not allowed to continue with his investigation. In fact, I soon learned that he had suddenly and inexplicably been transferred from the Albany office to California. This type of scenario has repeated itself many times, over the course of many years.
 
Typical denial and cover-up, and no way for the Target to nail down the government perps.
 
But back to Jeff Rense. By 1998, I had moved from the Pine Bush area to Woodstock, NY. I had cut off all contact with the Pine Bush UFO group, due to the fact that some of these people had begun to interfere in my investigations; poach my research and twist it to suit their own agenda, and betrayed my trust.
 
They divulged private information to the media about MY life and about sensitive issues and research which I had not intended to make public, at least not until I had collected enough evidence to substantiate it. In any case, these busybodies had no business whatsoever appointing themselves as town criers, exploiting the work of others in order to gain notoriety for themselves. I had made it clear that if I decided to go public with any (or all) information gleaned from my own investigations, that was solely my prerogative, when and if I so chose.
 
During that same year, 1998, I learned that some members of the UFO group in Pine Bush were to be guests on the Jeff Rense radio show. I was able to listen to the broadcast, and was outraged by what I heard.
 
First, all the research which I had conducted independently, or with a few other professionals, was claimed by these people (all rank amateurs) to have been done by them!
 
Worse, they twisted the information (some of which they clearly did not understand) and mixed it with wild speculation and uninformed, subjective personal opinions. They talked about their own personal experiences and tried to fit them into a framework for which they had no evidence.  The end result was that they managed to discredit not only themselves, but the entire body of research which I had so painstakingly conducted --none of which had anything to do with them.
 
The spin they put on their "story" was that they were being harassed by the government for "exposing" the UFO coverup in Pine Bush. But the last straw was when they told Jeff Rense that the incident with the F-15 fighter jet happened because the government considered THEM as a threat, and that THEY were the targets of this outrageous incident. Only one of them was actually present when the incident occurred.
 
During the entire interview, my name was never mentioned (thank the Lord for small mercies!), and yet they had managed to do tremendous damage to my work, and also to my reputation, since there were many people who were aware of my involvement in the Pine Bush UFO investigations.
 
Jeff Rense's attitude during the interview was one of complete sympathy and support for his guests. He coddled them, and seemed to take everything they said at face value, automatically agreed with them, never challenged them about any of their claims.  It was like he was there as part of an "infomercial", promoting this UFO group (comprised entirely of amateurs) as the yardstick by which all UFO/paranormal phenomena in Pine Bush should be measured, without looking any further into the much larger picture.
 
Outraged by this program, I decided to contact Jeff Rense and set the record straight. I wrote him an e-mail, outlining my concerns, as well as furnishing the actual facts which had been omitted, twisted beyond recognition, or "spun" to support false conclusions. I made sure to limit my message to address ONLY those issues which related directly to me and my work, which had been misrepresented by these individuals.
 
I also told him I wanted air time for a rebuttal, in defense of my own work, my professional reputation, and most importantly, the truth.
 
Prior to this time, I was well aware that Rense's program promoted much disinformation, of the government-sponsored variety. This of course is unavoidable, especially when the subject matter is UFOs and the paranormal. But given the fact that Rense's website/program was one of the major outlets for these topics, I knew that he couldn't possibly have gained such a large audience and become such a celebrated media personality unless the government allowed it, and was pulling at least some of the strings. The "alternative" media is no different than the mainstream in this respect.
 
By the same token, because of my own professional background in psychological operations, and because CIA had utilized me in media (they sponsored my TV and radio programs until I broke out of the operations), I know that the objective of these operations is not to expose truth, but to disseminate propaganda, about any issue or subject. It's all about 'agenda politics'.
 
I am not necessarily accusing Rense of being CIA. Truthfully, I don't know, and as I told Janet Phelan in a recent telephone conversation discussing this issue, I have never considered Jeff Rense (or others of his ilk) to be a "person of interest", at least not in my world.  
 
But I will say this:  CIA, according to their plan, for which they trained and groomed me, wanted me to do exactly what people like Jeff Rense, Alex Jones, and others, are doing: become a media  propagandist, wielding influence over large audiences. But I got out before they could cash in on their investment.
 
Once I fully realized where I was headed, or rather, where they were attempting to railroad me, I refused to cooperate.  I got off the propaganda train. The reason is very simple: I care about truth and I can't respect, endorse, support or collaborate with anyone who tries to lead me --or others-- away from truth, for any agenda.
 
Oh, and by the way, Jeff Rense never bothered to respond to my e-mail, in which I outlined the truth and the facts, and requested the opportunity to present them to his listening audience in rebuttal to the false information which was promoted by the Pine Bush UFO group.
 
Now, what does that tell you?
 
Barbara Hartwell Percival
July 2, 2011
 
NOTE: I had to remove the e-mail addresses (Tim White and Jeff Rense) and cc list, as I could not post due to problems with broken links.  

 
Barbara Hartwell Percival
Legal Defense & Research Trust
 
Barbara Hartwell Vs. CIA