On
April 20 the podcast of my interview (PART 2) with Ramola D of the
EveryDay Concerned Citizen was published on You Tube.
The
subject for discussion was COINTELPRO, specifically the operations
run by the FBI, in particular focusing on FBI chief and COINTELPRO
Kingpin, Ted Gunderson, J. Edgar Hoover's protege' and right hand
man.
Following
the video were a number of comments by listeners, two of which I will
address as an example of the pervasive COINTELPRO propaganda which is
parroted ad infinitum, ad nauseam, by the masses of asses who have
bought into it and swallowed it, hook, line and sinker.
I
should state up front (and as my regular readers will know) that I do
not run an “interactive” website. I do not solicit comments from
the readers. I do not engage the readers in discussions, arguments or
debates, nor answer questions, on this site or any other.
All
reports published on this site are “for information purposes only”,
a fact stated repeatedly in the NOTICES section at the top of the
site. The readers may make of my material what they will. Caveat
lector. The same applies to my radio interviews.
I
do not have a public e-mail address. Anyone who is interested in
contacting me may easily do so via my postal address, also given at
the top of the site.
I
realize that this policy is not the norm for most people who run
websites, nor is it typical of the culture of the Internet, which has
become a sort of gargantuan free-for-all, via social media,
discussion groups and venues of constant and instant contact among
individuals and groups.
I
do not participate in any of that; I find it highly invasive, even
offensive; nor would such engagement serve my professional purposes.
It does not concern me, “what people think” of me or my work;
whether they agree or disagree with the information I publish;
whether or not they share my opinions, viewpoints or political
ideology.
However,
when someone publicly defames my name, in any venue, such that false
information is promoted; such that my privacy is invaded; when there
is harassment; or there is injurious exploitation of my name, I may
decide to expose the individual(s), in my own defense, to refute the
libelous/slanderous falsehoods, and to set the record straight.
In
fact, many of the reports on this website are written precisely for
that purpose, to expose criminals, liars and frauds, many of whom
have engaged in character assassination, defamation and/or crimes
against persons (including Barbara Hartwell and/or my friends,
family, colleagues).
I
fully understand that when my work is published in other venues
(print or electronic/radio/video) that comments from
listeners/readers will be made, unsolicited by me. Usually, I ignore
these comments (favorable or otherwise). And sometimes, when it
serves a purpose, I address them, especially when they are
defamatory, or particularly stupid.
Then,
there is the fact that most people commenting in various venues
(including You Tube) hide behind aliases or screen names. I
automatically give zero credibility to such persons. If they are not
willing to give their real names, they are mere anonymous cowards,
defaming persons who DO use their real names.
Here,
a comment from one such person, whom I would describe as (among many
others of this ilk) a belligerent ignoramus. A person who does not
know what she is talking about; who states no facts; who provides no
evidence, except, perhaps, of her own malice and stupidity.
Rita:
"The
quest IS the dis-info Agent. Your guest states she heard from an
"unimpeachable source" that John de Camp was himself a
pedophile. Do know how much John de Camp did historically for child
trafficking!? How disrespectful. First your guest defames, Ted
Gunderson, a hero again in exposing child trafficking. De Camp and
Gunderson are both dead so they can't respond to the Interview. Then
the quest takes down Alex Jones : I've personally listen to Alex
Jones , for hours, for 8 years. He's honest. Judge him, then, by the
quests on his Show. Craig Sawyer, Vets for Child Rescue, is
frequently on. When Craig Sawyer couldn't get nothing going Alex
Jones gave him 100 Grand. Gerald Celente, another quest. Joel
Skousen, Matt Bracken, Navy Seal on & on When Trump bombed Syria,
Alex Jones did come out " yelling and hollering" and
uncensored 4 letter words at the President. Alex Jones is honest.
Alex Jones cares , firstly about Family. I wish Ramola more people
would come out "yelling and hollering" and I'll tell you
millions of educated listeners are relieved he does. I repeat: Your
guest is the disinfo agent. Period."
The
anonymous coward calling herself (or possibly himself, who can say?)
“Rita” begins by calling the “quest” a “disinfo agent”.
It appears she means to say “guest”, namely Barbara Hartwell.
"Do
know how much John de Camp did historically for child trafficking!?
How disrespectful."
Speaking
strictly for myself, as always, I know a great deal about the history
of John DeCamp, none of it good. Which comes from more than two
decades of dealings with DeCamp and Gunderson, as well as exhaustive
investigations.
I
know that DeCamp and Gunderson disseminated a plethora of material
about child trafficking, most of which has been blindly accepted and
endorsed by many people who have NOT done their own research, much
less investigations. They also maintained a network of cronies in the
intelligence community and media, as well as government stooges and
lackeys whom they exploited to do their dirty work.
Gunderson
and DeCamp are widely held up as heroes and patriot icons, but the
actual nature of their criminal activities have rarely been exposed.
My
expositions of these individuals have mostly fallen on deaf
ears, by those who are hell-bent on defending them, no matter how
large the body of evidence, nor the facts which could be verified,
should they choose to make an effort to remedy their willful
ignorance.
Many
others have chosen to attack the messenger, spreading outrageous and
defamatory falsehoods, usually parroting the very slurs against
Barbara Hartwell fabricated by Gunderson and DeCamp.
And
speaking of being “disrespectful”, I have no reason to respect
either one of them. Respect (aside from general respect for a
person's rights, privacy and personal boundaries) must be earned, not
given freely and blindly to those who not deserve it.
Then,
she states:
"De
Camp and Gunderson are both dead so they can't respond to the
Interview."
In
point of fact, I said nothing in this interview which I have not said
repeatedly, either in written reports or on radio, going back at
least fifteen years. There are no news flashes here, nothing these
men had not already been aware of.
And
Gunderson and DeCamp certainly have responded, many times, in many
venues, in their defamation campaign against Barbara Hartwell. Anyone
who does not believe this may easily find the evidence of their
“responses” plastered all over the Internet, including John
DeCamp's harassment and threats of a lawsuit against Barbara
Hartwell, exploiting the network of his fellow criminals, sex
predators (including targeting children), drug-traffickers and psycho
stalkers, including predicate felon, career criminal, Timothy Patrick
White and his accomplice, blackmailer, forger, identity thief, Todd
Brendan Fahey,
And
I don't do interviews (or write reports) in expectation of, nor
seeking any “response”. I state the facts, for information
purposes only. I have no control over what people believe, or the
comments they decide to make.
The
fact that Gunderson and DeCamp are dead is not an argument that
carries any weight. That's like saying, Oh, I dare not make any
negative comments about Adolf Hitler, Genghis Khan, Joseph Stalin,
etc. etc. He's DEAD and can't defend himself! Very, very stupid.
"Then
the quest takes down Alex Jones : I've personally listen to Alex
Jones , for hours, for 8 years. He's honest. Judge him, then, by the
quests on his Show."
Now,
she establishes that she is a huge fan of Alex Jones, and claims,
“He's honest”. I vehemently disagree and with good reason, based
on my personal and professional experience of many years.
And
no, I would not ever judge anyone (including Alex Jones) by the
guests on his show. My assessment of a person's character is solely
based on his own words and actions, and not by the company he keeps
or the guests he promotes on his show.
I
won't bother commenting on any of the names she mentions here, they
are irrelevant to the issue of the credibility and legitimacy of Alex
Jones himself, which in my opinion are nonexistent. I have personally
known quite a number of legitimate people who have been guests on
Alex Jones's show, most of whom later saw the truth, from their own
experiences. Jones exploits credible guests to give credibility to
himself and to further his own agenda. It is one of the oldest tricks
in the book.
Next
item:
"Alex
Jones is honest. Alex Jones cares , firstly about Family. I wish
Ramola more people would come out "yelling and hollering"
and I'll tell you millions of educated listeners are relieved he
does."
Aside
from his longtime involvement in counterintelligence operations, Alex
Jones is a loudmouthed grandstander and a narcissistic bully. True,
he has drawn many hapless people into his media empire, and fleeced
them for millions of dollars, but I would not call his fans
“educated”. Rather, indoctrinated, by the very brand of
counterintelligence propaganda engineered long ago by the likes
COINTELPRO Kingpin Ted Gunderson.
As
for his “caring” about “Family”? Perhaps this video of his
ex-wife will shed some light on the true nature of Alex Jones.
EXCLUSIVE:
Alex Jones' Ex-Wife Tells All, Conspiracies, Fake Supplements
Lastly,
this:
"I
repeat: Your guest is the disinfo agent. Period."
This
credulous fool is entitled to her opinion, though clearly based on
nothing more substantial than her subjective biases and utter lack of
discernment.
But
then, that is precisely what these counterintelligence propagandists
count on, as they rake in the big bucks, laughing all the way to the
bank.
Now,
the second comment from another anonymous coward, hiding behind this
screen name.
dontwantanewchannel
"I
love how this lady brings up her personal relationship with the only
two credible sources TargetedJustice has... heh I think heh this lady
is heh heh full of heh SHIIIIIT!!"
Since
he/she does not name the so-called “credible sources” to whom he
refers, there is no way of knowing who they are. I mentioned quite a
number of names in the interview. I have no idea what this
“TargetedJustice” is, either.
But
let this serve as a typical example of the crude and malicious
mentality of those who have no better use for their time than
shooting off their mouths on a public message board.
And
now, for some actual evidence of just one of Ted Gunderson's many
counterintelligence operations against whistleblowers and
dissidents.
This
is an excerpt from a report on this site, containing a portion of a
document from my files, Ted Gunderson's letter to Larry Flynt. My
comments follow.
Ted
Gunderson's Published Proposal to Deploy COINTELPRO Tactics
Excerpt
from Ted Gunderson's Letter to Larry Flynt
December
21, 1998
Larry Flynt
Flynt Publications
PROPOSAL
TO DISCLOSE AND DISRUPT ILLEGAL ACTIVITY OF GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRATS
AND POLITICIANS
I.
Counter Intelligence Operation
Organize
a select group of trusted, loyal Americans to operate an effective
legal counter-intelligence operation. The goal of a
counter-intelligence operation is to educate and, in some instances,
to disrupt the enemy by mailing anonymous letters to selected
individuals and groups in order to create distrust and paranoia.
Another goal is to furnish disinformation and create confusion. I was
a counter-intelligence expert in the FBI and I am aware of numerous
techniques with which to work towards this goal. I wish to emphasize
we will not conduct any criminal or illegal activity, nor violate any
laws. All activities would be legal. There are other techniques than
can be used, in addition to anonymous letters, i.e., telephone calls
from public telephones. Disinformation can also be spread on radio
and television talk shows.
End
of excerpt
*******
First,
I would say that Gunderson's choice of an accomplice for his
operation, the notorious pornographer, publisher of Hustler magazine,
has got to be the lowest sleazoid on the face of the earth. Ask
yourself, who would want to do business with a low-life like
Flynt?
Next, note that Ted Gunderson states that he was "a
counter-intelligence expert in the FBI." Really? Then any
reasonable person is left to draw the conclusion that Ted Gunderson
was COINTELPRO, as that is the primary counter-intelligence operation
in the FBI.
And now, he is looking to recruit more accomplices
for his "legal" counter-intelligence operation.
"A
select group of trusted, loyal Americans..."
Who
could these "loyal Americans" be?
Let's start with
some known associates of Ted L. Gunderson: Ken Adachi; Timothy
Patrick White; Larry Lawson; Pamela Schuffert; John DeCamp. There are
others, too numerous to mention, but these names will certainly be
recognizable to anyone with an interest in the controversy this issue
has generated over the past decade.
And for a damning
statement, this one can't be beat:
"Disinformation
can also be spread on radio and television talk shows."
So,
Ted Gunderson, in his own words, suggests spreading disinformation!
And as many of us who have become his targets know, he's done just
that, and in spades.
I
can't count the times that Ted has gone on the airwaves slandering
Barbara Hartwell, stating that I am a "government spook" or
"CIA disinfo agent."
[For
the primary example, at least in print, see the New Age/government
disinformation website of Gunderson's PR shill, Ken Adachi.]
Fact
is, this operation has been running for a long time. Ted Gunderson,
joined by his cronies and amateur recruits (government stooges Tim
White, Pam Schuffert, Ken Adachi, Todd Fahey, Larry Lawson et al)
have wreaked havoc on the lives of many COINTELPRO targets. And there
is no end in sight.....
As far as I can see, this so-called
"legal" counter-intelligence operation will continue until
the lives of the targets are so far destroyed that there is no hope
to repair the damages.
And by the way, there is nothing
"legal" about fraud, criminal stalking, identity theft,
extortion, criminal harassment, death threats, murder-for hire
schemes, inciting violence and terrorism.....this operation is a
criminal conspiracy par excellence, rife with most every crime
imaginable. Racketeering at its finest.
As
for the privacy invasions and the libel/slander campaigns against
targets, I guess you might stretch it to say these are "legal".
After all, these are civil matters.
And since most of the law
enforcement to whom we have reported these crimes refuse to do
anything to protect the targets of criminal harassment/stalking and
threats of violence and death (which are crimes) --or more to the
point, to enforce the law-- who is going to care that the reputations
of decent, legitimate Messengers of Truth and Defenders of Liberty
are being destroyed, along with every other area of our lives?
Nobody. After all, that is what "neutralization" is all
about.
*******
I
will be covering the subject of Ted Gunderson and his
counterintelligence operations in much more detail in PART 3 of my
interviews with Ramola D of The EveryDay Concerned Citizen.
Barbara
Hartwell Percival
April
25, 2018