William Miller on Ed Brown and "WAR RHETORIC"

This report is posted FYI. The position stated here is that of William Miller, not Barbara Hartwell. However, Bill is a true defender of Liberty and I know him to be a person of integrity and honor. People should hear what he has to say and draw their own conclusions.

Thank you for your consideration.
 
Barbara Hartwell
August 15, 2007

PRESS RELEASE: William Miller on Ed Brown and "WAR RHETORIC"

From New Hampshire, in re: Ed Brown's recent media antics.

I am William Miller, known in some circles as a defender of Liberty, and known as one of the closest supporters of Edward-Lewis and Elaine: Brown.

I do hereby officially state that I am not to be known as a "supporter," nor associate of Edward-Lewis:Brown.

This is not an effort to cut this beleaguered old man's throat,and leave him back for the wolves. Nor is it a grant of permission to the forces of the Communo-fascist UNITED POLICE STATES Occupation, to do further harm to Ed and Elaine, quite the contrary.

WE ALL KNOW WHO IS THE REAL AGGRESSOR IN THESE REGARDS, AND THAT WILL CARRY FAR REACHING REPERCUSSIONS, AS WE BEGIN TO WITNESS THE CRUMBLING OF THE UNITED POLICE STATES, JUST LIKE WE SAW THE CRUMBLING OF THE SOVIET UNION.

I have made it clear with Ed Brown, beginning with my entrance into "the seige," in early January, that his efforts at "communication," were inappropriate, ultimately detrimental to his own cause, and harmful to the greater cause of resurgent Liberty.

Brown has ignored, on many occassions throughout the years, the good council of some valiant, focused, hard-working freedom fighters whom, unfortunately, exemplify a larger spiritual vision, and a more finely tuned sense of balance and reason than does Brown.

I have known Ed for more than seven years, and stood with him at "the Alamo," in the clutch, long before anyone even thought of having a concert in the summer outside his house, (now that we have seen a, perhaps brief, time of relative safety for summer patriots and sunshine soldiers). As such, I am officially stating to the world:

Ed Brown has far overstepped the bounds of any "authority" he may have had, with concerned freedom fighters, by way of having gained some national reknown as a Constitutionalist. Ed Brown has made far-ranging claims, on behalf of an undefined set of men and women, known as "supporters," claims that he is not properly empowered to make.

Whatever Ed may have said on Wednesday last, which, of course is subject to the far-reaching revisions of "journalists," who seem all too eager to badger an angry, beleaguered old man, into saying whatever suits their narrow agenda (certainly that agenda not being to seek the truth), the fact remains that no one declares war on my behalf. Nor does Ed Brown have the authority to declare war on behalf of the rest of the nation, any more than the big-eared village idiot outta Texas has any right to do so, unilaterally, from the security of his oval office.

Furthermore, Ed Brown was handed by God, and by the probabilty fields of the expanding, life-seeking Universe, a tailor made opportunity, to stop the world, and open a window of opportunity for ongoing, meaningful communication with the world, regarding legitimate, widespread grievances of our free people; grievances which mirror the grievances enumerated in the Declaration of Independence; an opportunity to send an elevated message of resurgent Liberty to the freedom-seeking men and women of the world, whose ranks grow daily due to concern over the murder in Iraq, and the assault upon Liberty throughout the world, by the Communo-fascist United Police States, the private corporation that occupies this land, in violation of Article Ten of the New Hampshire Bill of Rights, The Right of Revolution.

Ed Brown failed his mission categorically.

I do not blame Brown. He is no criminal; in essence an honest man, who worked his way up from five years of homelessness in which he never took a dime of public money, and built himself a successful business, before meeting his current wife.

Ed Brown was pushed over the top with personal anger because, knowing he had committted no crime, he was examined up the rectum by the dirty, sleasy little joker, Deputy US Marshall Gary Dimartino, who has a fetish for other men's recti, and is soon to retire, having done his share to create the mess in Plainfield Yes, the sleazy little joker is going to retire and live out his life at the expense of the working men and women of this country, having blatantly committed crimes against a man and woman, who, clearly, have committed no crime. Elaine was examined in the vagina as well as the rectum, by a female joker officer, all on camera for complete humiliation of course, all because they would not pay a tax for which there is no law.

After the Stalinist sham trial, Ed went so far as to offer Colontuono and his sleazy little partner in crime, whatever his side-kicks name is..., to make a payment to the Communo-fascist United Police States, of $656,000 US, in exchange for being left alone.

But Colontuono and company wanted to go for blood. Thinking it was a walk in the park, just like the blitzkriegers were going to drive the 62nd Army of the Soviet Union into the Volga, and be home by Christmans, Colontuono and company were determined to go for blood. They could have walked away with $656,000 in extortionary tribute, and left an old man and his wife with their lives in shambles and publicly humilitated, but it was not enough.

The agents of Communo-fascist tyranny wanted to go for it all.

They bought the whirlwind.

Having been subjected to a slam bang media circus of a Stalinist show trial, at the hands of US Attorney Colontuono, and the "judge" McAuliffe, and having been suppressed, blatantly and openly in his efforts to wage a defense, in a matter that ought not have gone to trial in the first place, Ed Brown, was tired, and understandably enraged, when I departed the warm sunny beaches of Florida, to return to the Northland, and handle the business of communicating Brown's cause, and the cause of Liberty.

Brown, in a state of anger and confusion, was soon to reject my efforts, and those of others, who had come as reinfforcements, to hold the line against Communo-fascist aggression by the forces of the United Police States.

Meanwhile, Colontuono, McAuliffe, magistrate judge Muirhead, Gary DiMartino, and Monier, as well as a boatload of public officials at local, state and federal levels, in four states and to the inspector general's office of the Justice Department, continue to ignore tha fact that:

THERE IS WIDESPREAD, GROWING EVIDENCE, THE CRUX OF WHICH I HAVE IN HAND, PROVIDED BY PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR DOTTY CASTORA OF MAINE, THAT "CHIEF OF POLICE" ROBERGE, OF FARMINGTON, NEW HAMPSHIRE, IS AN ACCOMPLICE BEFORE THE FACT, TO THE MURDER IN FARMINGTON, NH OF PHIL CASTORA, AND THAT A COVER-UP IS BEING PERPETUATED BY THE FARMINGTON SELECTMEN, AND EVERYONE ELSE UP THE CHAIN OF RESPONSIBILITY AS I HAVE INDICATED.

GARY DIMARTINO WAS NOTIFIED BY ME IN MID JANUARY OF MY ONGOING, UNANSWERED GRIEVANCES AGAINST ROBERGE AND COMPANY AS STATED IN ("FEDERAL LAWSUIT") MILLER V CHIEF OF POLICE CONWAY ET AL, 2001. DIMARTINO SAID "I WILL LOOK INTO IT." APPARENTLY HE NEVER DID. IT IS A WELL DOCUMENTED SET OF FACTS, UNCHALLENGED AND UNREBUTTED, THAT ROBERGE AND HIS ACCOMPLICES IN THE FARMINGTON, BARRINGTON, AND ROCHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENTS COMITTED A BOATLOAD OF FEDERAL CRIMES AGAINST MY FAMILY, IN RETALIATION FOR SOME THINGS I BROUGHT TO LIGHT REGARDING INSTITUTIONAL DRUG CORRUPTION AND THE SCAM PSYOPS CAMPAIGN KNOWn AS "WARONDRUGS."

In Rochester, New Hampshire, we have a "Chief of Police," who used his influence, first to cover up the commission of the crime of rape by his son. Then, when I found about about it by way of street level intelligence, and reported on the matter, in 2003, to Judge Pam Albee, of Rochester District Court, in a document that was provided the Rochester City Council, and other agencies, in 2005 it was revealed in the Foster's Daily Democrat of Dover, that Chief of Police Dubois son, had gone before a secret grand jury for rape. Not long after, the youth wrote a letter of apology to his rape victim, whose family no longer wants to talk about it--hmmmmmm, wonder why----and that letter by no means, mind you, was an admission of guilt, just a device to carry out an agreement, whereby the charges were dropped.

It is of course, not necessary for any of these matters of police corruption, to be investigated, because God knows, the public safety is far more threatened by people like Edward and Elaine.

I will have more to present in these regards, by way of the public forum at www.nhfree.com, or at www.edbrown.org. Perhaps in the future I will construct my own site and freeze some of my documents as is: what I am saying is that I have some things to say to the world to sum up this situation and round out the true story, having known Brown many years, and that I want to get out of all of this, because, at age 42, I am a long time veteran of these stupid little psypos-counter-psyops games, and I am tired of it.

AS FOR LEADERSHOP IN THE DIRECTION OF RESURGENT LIBERTY, I REFER AMERICA, AND THE WORLD, TO

WWW.IAMSOVEREIGN.ORG. 

It is time to get out of these bought and paid for courts, and reactivate the Old Republic, under Articles of Confederation. Check out the site; you will see what I mean.

I also refer you to www.cloakanddagger.de ---scroll down far, to the interview with Greg Hallett, "US Is Really A British Tax Plantation,"

and see the report, "Dissent of the Pennsylvania Minority (To the Constitutional Convention).

The truth is, that the US was sold out to the British empire by way of a back door deal, through Article Six of the Administrative part of the US (C)onstitution, which does not rescind, and cannot rescind the International Treaty, and law of nations, the Articles of Confederation.

See also the works of Thomas Paine, Samuel Adams, Light Horse Harry Lee (the father of Robert E. Lee), George mason of Virginia, and Patrick Henry. Not every founder and/or freemason was a sellout.

www.iamsovereign.org; www.cloakanddagger.de--Greg Hallett; www.illuminati-news.com

Faithfully, and in peace,

from the Northland,

William Miller

JAMES F. MARINO'S RAMPAGE OF LIBEL

"....at least Geral Sosbee has some class -- something you'll never have."

 

--James F. Marino, slur against Barbara Hartwell

"The word, 'class', refers to the honor of association with those of spiritual greatness, courage and strength of character. Any 'class' that may be discernible in or attributable to Geral Sosbee emanates from his privileged friendship with great persons such as Barbara Hartwell."

--Geral Sosbee

  Geral Sosbee wrote:

 

"The following statements by James Marino regarding my friend Barbara Hartwell are false, mean-spirited, and ill considered; the remarks should be retracted (along with an apology) now:"

"Hence it is all the more disturbing that Barbara Hartwell would attempt to undermine my work. And this is indicative of what I have been reading about her on myriad other Websites."

Predictably, like so many others who pretend to know far more than they do about the issues being addressed here, and whose writings blatantly exhibit their own ignorance, James Marino has now embarked on a rampage of libel against Barbara Hartwell.

In a report dated August 10, 2007, I made some simple statements of fact regarding the dissemination of misinformation about myself, my friend and professional colleague, ex-FBI agent Geral Sosbee (about which he has made it very clear he is in agreement with me) and others on his website; and I requested that Mr. Marino remove my previous endorsement of his website, which was prominently displayed in bold type in the sidebar of his site. This endorsement was written BEFORE I became aware that he was misrepresenting quite a few expositors of government corruption in a false light.

I also made it clear that, having discovered (over a period of months, after looking further into the material posted on his site) that I am in vehement disagreement with Mr. Marino's politics (as outlined in my two previous reports); and that I could not in good conscience endorse a website which promoted government disinfo websites, such as Educate-Yourself, that of government stooge and malicious liar, Ken Adachi, who has been running a vicious libel campaign against Barbara Hartwell for the past six (6) years.

Ken Adachi is part of a criminal conspiracy in which a number of such people have been in collusion for years; including to target legitimate whistleblowers for harassment, persecution, and libel campaigns which include government-sponsored black propaganda.

On his website (to name just a few of the criminal conspirators) Adachi features people such as ex-FBI agent Ted Gunderson, ex-officio COINTELPRO, de facto COINTELPRO; Tim White, career criminal, predicate felon, stalker, who had made numerous DEATH THREATS against Barbara Hartwell and others; Todd Brendan Fahey, criminal stalker, identity thief, blackmailer.

Why in hell would I endorse Mr. Marino's website when he is providing links which promote my enemies?

And, ironically, who are part of the very COINTELPRO operations Mr. Marino claims to be "exposing".

Yet Mr. Marino's obnoxious aggression in attempts to justify his foolishness and bottomless ignorance now takes the form of aligning with one of these criminals, namely Ken Adachi. Here, he uses Adachi's epithet, "The Merchant of Venom" to describe Barbara Hartwell.

Mr. Marino is now parroting the very type of COINTELPRO black propaganda he claims to oppose in attempts to discredit Barbara Hartwell. He thus now defines himself as just another "useful idiot".

Here are some excerpts from Mr. Marino's latest libel of Barbara Hartwell, which he has added to his original post. My comments are in brackets, preceded by my initials, BH.

Good Riddance -- I Retract My Former Support For Barbara Hartwell Learning First Hand Why One Person Refers To Her As The Merchant Of Venom

"I'm just glad that I never sent her a dime in donation fees; something I actually considered doing at one point. And she is clearly is disinforming the public when it comes to the FEDS' attacks on myself and my Family -- something which continues to happen in the present day. She has no idea what they have put us through so how dare she presume to know otherwise?! And Barbara has done all of us an enormous injustice by making her crude and ignorant comments."

[BH: I've never heard of anything called a "donation fee". But I don't accept "fees" for my work. I only accept donations in the form of Christian charity, otherwise known as "love gifts". But I too am glad he didn't send me money. If he had, I'm sure it would only have increased his self-righteous boasting about his previous "support."

I am "disinforming" nobody. And I have "presumed" to know nothing whatsoever about Mr. Marino, his family, or what their experiences have been.

Mr. Marino has publicized his claims about his own case, but his personal claims about "the FEDS" were never the issue of concern to me. He was the one who brought this irrelevent argument up by ASSUMING (falsely, I might add) that my purpose was to "undermine" his "work".

Anyone may see this by simply reading my first report. In my second report, I addressed this issue ONLY in response to Marino's fallacious arguments about this very subject.]

"And yes Barbara, like you, I am entitled to my opinion. I expect this will bring on yet another rant, so go ahead and waste your time. I am through wasting my time where you are concerned. Perhaps there is more CIA left in you than you imagined. As for my comments in regard to the NSA's illegal spying on my person and myriad others, I stand by them. John Akwei's information in regard to satellite based remote neural monitoring is for real and this agency is illegally spying into the homes of a great number of Americans, as well as subjecting us to mind control experimentation. Your Website has never once mentioned any of this or even John's lawsuit against the NSA. I wonder why something of such importance to the American people is not mentioned on your site given that you CLAIM to be a government whistle blower?

As for people saying that you continue to be a disinformation agent (since your claim to having broken free of the CIA years ago), I have no idea if this is true of not. However, I will no longer rule it out."

[BH: Marino keeps stating that he is through wasting his time. He has changed this same post, over the past few days, adding to and editing it, even changing the title (the latest, with Adachi's phrase, being given above), each time saying it is a waste of his time. Why then, does he keep at this?

As for myself, I do not consider it a waste of my time to refute his libelous remarks --tiresome, yes, but necessary on principle. Because when it comes to defending the Truth, I'm all business. Mr. Marino evidently finds the truth to be offensive, but that's his problem, not mine.

In his apparent desperation to defend his own position, Marino now resorts to the old standby: accusing Barbara Hartwell of being CIA. Very predictable. That's what almost all of these fools say when they are confronted with their own ignorance and arrogance and told they will be held accountable for it.

Yet again, Marino brings in a topic which is totally irrelevant to the issue at hand: a lawsuit by John St. Clair Akwei. For Mr. Marino's edification, I've been aware of the case since it first became public. What's his point here?

It is none of Marino's business what I choose to publish on my website. I don't answer to him, nor am I required to explain myself.]

"And as far as writing responses to people's comments, at least Geral Sosbee has some class -- something you'll never have. Moreover, most of your rants are complete nonsense. As for your criticisms regarding libel, take a good look through your two recent posts in regard to your attacks on me and my Website, and you will find plenty of your own. Your stating that I must have known that you removed the links to my Website as I posted your comments. How do you arrive at this conclusion? Are you so important that people plan their entire days around what you do? Perhaps the CIA also trained you to be a clairvoyant when they were teaching you to be disinfo artist? It sounds to me like you are the one who's guilty of conjecture here."

[BH: Mr. Marino's lovely 'class' comment has already been addressed by Geral Sosbee. Thank you, Geral, from the bottom of my heart. I have no further comment.

Again, Marino continues with his tiresome assumptions. But actually, he did get one thing right, albeit by accident: In fact, I am clairvoyant, but not because I was trained to be by CIA. That's a gift from God, a "gift of the spirit" I've had since childhood. The training only enhanced my natural talents. In fact, my talents in the 'paranormal' realm, what some might call supernatural, was one of the ways I was utilized by CIA. I haven't written much about this, simply because I am far more concerned with defending Liberty than with providing background information on myself.

But the comment about the "disinfo artist" is way out of line. Mr. Marino's unmitigated stupidity is truly astounding.]

"I also wonder if there is not some other underlying factor in her removal of my posts that she is not talking about? Something that might give me better insight into how the FEDS routinely trash my reputation as part of their long-term COINTELPRO against me? However, only Barbara knows that."

[BH:Keep wondering, Mr. Marino. If you are really as intellectually challenged as you appear to be, you'll be wondering a long, long time.]

"In regard to morality, what can you say for federal agencies that use satellites to spy on Americans within the privacy of their own bathrooms and bedrooms? Agencies that have a history of lying about everything they do; even the most horrific crimes ever documented. Like it or not you once worked for one of these agencies Ms. Hartwell. And they appear to have taught you well."

[Mr. Marino appears to be obsessed with spying in "bedrooms and bathrooms". He has blathered on about this ad nauseum in his many commentaries. But why connect any of this to me? Personally, I have had no problems with this particular form of "spying" being directed at me, nor have I ever participated in any such lowlife activities.

Why a cheap shot like this? Speaking of 'class', Marino has about as much 'class' as a cubic yard of dirt.]

"Like the US Intelligence Community, Ms. Hartwell simply leaves out the information that does not suit her purpose. That is the same as lying. And yes, I know that she will probably read this as soon as it gets posted. I do find it necessary to update my posts from time to time and so do many others. After all, we can't all be as perfect as Barbara Hartwell. As for lying, she is an admitted disinfo agent for the CIA who lied professionally while employed by them. So she is in no position to criticize anyone else. And as for her criticisms regarding my moral compass and those of others, I cite the following quote: "people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones." People reinvent themselves all the time and it appears that Ms. Hartwell is attempting to do the same. Hence her holier than thou attitude."

[BH: "An admitted disinfo agent for the CIA"? Nowhere have I ever "admitted" to such a thing. Now, Marino has really gone off the deep end. How much nastier can he get?

If anyone needs to "reinvent" himself, perhaps Mr. Marino might benefit from giving it a shot.

1) He could stop talking about people and subjects on which he is appallingly ignorant.

2) He could actually do some research and start dealing in facts, for a change. Perhaps he could start by hiring a fact checker, as he seems incapable of gathering his own factual data.

That way, he might avoid exposing himself as a pretentious and presumptuous fool, a pompous windbag and an aggressive ignoramus.

3) He could get a clue about who's who and what's what when it comes to disinformation, COINTELPRO, "sting operations" and the like, before he presumes to tell the public that they can "educate" themselves by reading his website.

Go for it, Mr. Marino! It's never too late to "reinvent" yourself.

Barbara Hartwell

August 14, 2007

REFUTING LIBELOUS FALSEHOODS & OTHER NONSENSE FROM JAMES MARINO

The following commentary comes from James Marino, posted on his website, 9-11 the Mother of All Black Operations.

My comments in repsonse to Mr. Marino are in brackets, preceded by my initials, BH.

Thanks to my friend Geral Sosbee for coming to my defense and telling it like it is, as he always does. I should make it clear that Geral's brief statement was written in response to the ORIGINAL, much shorter post by Mr. Marino, before he added all of what follows here. Mr.Marino failed to state that, so I have.

And although I really hated having to take the time to refute the foolishness being spouted by Mr. Marino, it was not something I was about to let slide.

Please see my original report (August 10, 2007) titled: Correcting Misinformation & Retracting Recommendation, in which I exposed the misinformation being disseminated on James Marino's website, about Barbara Hartwell and others.

Barbara Hartwell

August 12, 2007

Unfortunate Turn Of Events & Great Disappointment

"The following is a recent post from Geral Sosbee on his Website regarding my post below:"

"The following statements by James Marino regarding my friend Barbara Hartwell are false, mean-spirited, and ill considered; the remarks should be retracted (along with an apology) now:"

"Hence it is all the more disturbing that Barbara Hartwell would attempt to undermine my work. And this is indicative of what I have been reading about her on myriad other Websites."

"My response: Geral there will be no apology issued since it was clear that Barbara's comments had every intention of discrediting my own personal experiences. And moreover, that she left out much pertinent information which would serve to prove that I am telling the truth."

[BH: Mr. Marino's "personal experiences" are not, and never were, the issue and I would have no reason to wish to discredit him. But I will add that by this time, he's done a fine job of discrediting himself.

The primary issue I addressed in my report was that Mr. Marino has, over a considerable period of time, been promoting FALSE information about Barbara Hartwell and others. This misinformation is damaging and I found it necessary to correct it and refute it with the facts.

As for "leaving out pertinent information"? That is subjective and irrelevant, a non-issue. I am not required to defend or promote Mr. Marino's claims of truthfulness. Nor am I required to go through all his writings with a fine-tooth comb in search of possible clues to his truthfulness, or lack thereof.

As for proving the "truth" of his allegations, by my standards, proof can only be established by irrefutable hard evidence. I have seen no such evidence, but again, that was never the issue I addressed.

Anyone who establishes a website and publishes material, including his or her personal testimony, can reasonably expect the readers to assess their writings, use their own discernment (intellectually/morally/spiritually) and to draw their own conclusions.

As a reader of any website (including Mr. Marino's) I am entitled to form any opinions I may hold as to the veracity of the information in question. It's just that simple, yet Mr. Marino is engaging in convoluted "logic" which goes nowhere, and establishes the truth of nothing.]

"There are numerous Websites in which Barbara has attacked the characters of many people; I know this because I have seen these sites. And on certain occasions she may well have been right to do so. However, when she makes comments such as the one where she states that I support Ken Adachi, this is a deliberate attempt at misrepresenting the facts. How does Barbara know whether or not I support Ken? For the record, I have no opinion on him either way. However, I do find many of the articles listed on his Website to be of interest me -- especially those of a paranormal nature. Yet, once again, that does not mean that I support him."

[BH: Like so many others of his ilk, Mr. Marino seems eager to accuse me of "attacking" people. But there is a vast difference between attacking a person's character and EXPOSING the crimes that person has perpetrated; the scams and hoaxes he or she is running, or the moral/spiritual bankruptcy of that person's character.

The people Mr. Marino makes reference to (he only names one, Ken Adachi, and I'll get to him in a moment) are CRIMINALS. They are all malicious liars. Some are criminal stalkers, some have made numerous threats against Barbara Hartwell, including DEATH THREATS. All of them fall into at least one of the following (broad) categories:

1) Corrupt/criminal Government agents/operatives, covert or overt

2) Stooges of criminal government agents/operatives

3) Minions/shills of criminal government agents/operatives

4) Useful idiots who promote government disinformation and/or black propaganda, knowingly or unknowingly, often simply parroting the libelous/slanderous falsehoods they have read/heard.

5) Criminals who have "made a deal" --avoiding jail time/get out of jail-- in exchange for becoming snitches/stool pigeons and/or participating in harassment of legitimate whistleblowers/patriots/Liberty activists.

Exposing crimes and corruption connected to government is what a legitimate whistleblower DOES. Mr. Marino just doesn't seem to get that. And by speaking about people and issues he clearly knows little or nothing about, he is awarding potential credibility to these criminals who claim I am "attacking" them, and who Mr. Marino now also claims I am attacking.

Mr. Marino is certainly free to believe what he will, and to express his opinions, however misguided they may be. 

But I will not just stand by and allow him to libel me in this manner. I will, as always, set the record straight with the truth and the facts, in defense of my good name and in defense of the principles I hold.

Re Ken Adachi: I never, at any time, claimed that Mr. Marino "supports" Ken Adachi. I merely stated that he PROMOTED Adachi's website, Educate-Yourself, by providing links to the website for various articles.

(See my original report for confirmation.)

Ken Adachi runs a government/disinfo/New Age website. He is a government stooge and minion of COINTELPRO Ted Gunderson. He endorses and promotes corrupt government agents/operatives, criminals, porno-mongers, stalkers and malicious liars. Adachi has gone so far as to place a permanent link on his website, dedicating an entire section to libeling Barbara Hartwell. It is titled: Barbara Hartwell, CEO of Liars, Inc.

Adachi is also soliciting further criminal harassment/stalking of Barbara Hartwell, thus violating my privacy, compromising my security and endangering my safety, by publishing my UNLISTED street address on his website, in an article written by criminal stalker/blackmailer/porno-monger/malicious liar Todd Brendan Fahey. Soliciting criminal harassment is a crime in and of itself.

And so, if Mr. Marino has "no opinion either way" about a criminal government stooge and malicious liar like Ken Adachi, I would have to wonder if he has any moral compass at all. It would seem not.

But the bottom line is this: I do NOT want my name connected to ANY website (including Mr. Marino's) which PROMOTES evildoers and crimnals like Ken Adachi. Case closed.]

"Now while I cannot legally force you to remove the links to my site that you have listed (anymore than you can force me to keep your links on my Website) I am asking that you do so. I don't enjoy having to post anything defamatory on either you or Barbara and I would prefer to be able to just delete this post altogether -- which I will gladly do if you agree to do the same on your Websites."

[BH: Mr. Marino does not need to try to "force" anyone to remove links to his site. Geral Sosbee informed me days ago that he intended to do just that, before any such request was made by Mr. Marino.

No doubt, Mr. Marino is now certainly posting defamatory material about Barbara Hartwell. He even admits it. However, I have no intention of removing my report on Mr. Marino. There was no defamation involved, none whatsoever. The report is truthful, based on facts and was written in defense of my own good name, as well as to correct errors on Mr. Marino's part, in service to the truth, and as a matter of principle.

I don't want Mr. Marino to delete anything. I couldn't give a tinker's damn what he does. He has made his position clear, though his arguments don't begin to hold water.

I am addressing ISSUES. Mr. Marino, on the other hand, is simply trying to justify his wrongful behavior by "attacking the messenger".]

"Barbara claimed that I had misrepresented her in many posts in which she has been mentioned and her name has been removed from the offending posts -- and in some instances the entire post. I have also removed the posts from the sidebar which she complained about. I have done what she asked".

[BH: Thank you, Mr. Marino. However, you have now replaced mere inaccuracies, misstatements of fact, erroneous suppositions and the like with libel, which you will be held accountable for.]

"If she had just sent me an E-mail (or asked you to -- you do have my Email address) this could have been done without the need to post here on the Websites themselves. However she chose to do otherwise."

[BH: I do not need or use intermediaries. Geral Sosbee is my friend and professional colleague, not a conduit to deliver messages from me. False information was being disseminated on Mr. Marino's website, also placing Barbara Hartwell in a "false light". This is a public matter, not a private one.

When I become aware that misinformation (intended as such or not) or purposeful disinformation is being disseminated publicly, using my name, it is my policy to refute falsehoods with facts, also publicly.]

"I have no desire to get into a war of words with either of you. You can avoid this by simply removing all reference to my Website from your own and to request that Barbara remove her recent post. This way there will be no need for us to continue in this vein. No one wins a war of words. They only end up saying cruel things which they later regret. And given our daily battles with the FEDS and their psyops none of us has the energy to attack one another -- something that I believe would be extremely foolhardy on all our parts."

[BH: Marino contradicts himself here re the "war of words." By this very response to my report, he draws first blood by his provocations.

But sorry, I see no point in engaging in a "war of words" with an unarmed man. Maybe it might behoove Mr. Marino to realize that and give it up. And defending my eminently justified and reasonable position and refuting falsehoods is not foolhardy, but necessary.

Mr. Marino is attempting to take the moral high ground to justify the unjustifiable. It's a common tactic used by those who are so ego-centered, they can't see the forest for the trees; and can't see the difference between facts and their own subjective (and uninformed) personal opinions.

His arguments are based on false premises. Let him do as he will, say what he will. By continuing in this vein, he will only continue to discredit himself by showing himself to be a person who would rather attack the messengers of truth, rather than acknowledge his own ignorance and take steps to remedy it.]

"So please do the right thing and remove all references to my Website and self from your own and please ask Barbara to do the same. And I will happily remove this entire Post. I am not being unreasonable here, nor am I looking to defame either one of you. I have done as Barbara requested and I am now asking you both do as I request. And I will happily remove this entire post; one which I was not at all pleased to have written.

 

Jim"

[BH: Do the right thing? Mr. Marino has a lot to learn about the principles of truth and justice.

The "right thing" would have been very easy to do, as well as very simple. Mr. Marino could have simply acknowledged his mistakes, including factual errors --as I pointed out in my report. He could have simply removed the past endorsement I had written for his website (now retracted by me) as per my request, without resorting to ad hominem attacks against Barbara Hartwell in a futile attempt to defend his untenable position.

He could have apologized for not respecting the personal boundaries of others (including mine) by presuming to speak about them/for them, thus publicly promoting damaging misinformation, based on nothing more than his erroneous assumptions; and redolent of his own ignorance of the issues. He could have done all these things. Instead, he chose to provoke an argument he cannot possibly win.]

JAMES MARINO COMMENTS ON HARTWELL & SOSBEE

"To Whom It May Concern:

In the past I have given a great deal of moral support to both Geral W. Sosbee and Barbara Hartwell -- two former US Intelligence operatives who became whistle blowers when they saw crimes being committed within their respective agencies.

I have also given Geral Sosbee $750 to maintain his Website; Geral himself has acknowledged that I am the only person to have ever given him any monies in efforts to help him promulgate his information."

[BH: Speaking strictly for myself, I have never needed nor requested Mr. Marino's "moral support." If he chose to support my work, of his own volition, because he found it to be valuable (for whatever reasons) that would have been to his credit, had he not eventually overstepped his bounds by attempting to enhance his own credibility by exploiting my name and making unreasonable and inaccurate comparisons between his alleged case and my own.

And I have to wonder why Mr. Marino feels the need to tout his contribution to Geral Sosbee, especially by naming an exact sum. I think that would be best left as private business between donor and recipient. I do not speak for Geral, but I do know that Geral has made it clear, publicly, that he appreciated Mr. Marino's generous donation and thanked him for it.

Donating money to support what one believes to be a worthy person or cause is admirable --as long as the donor does not expect that he is "buying" influence, loyalty, or other "quid pro quo" benefits by so doing. I'm not accusing Mr. Marino of this, but I do find it remarkable that he seems to be using this donation as a promotional device for himself.]

"Moreover, I have never once been anything but kind and supportive of both of these people in efforts to understand their predicaments while they (by their own accounts) have been treated viciously by so many others."

[BH: As stated in my report, Mr. Marino does not know me. He has never been a friend or colleague, but is a complete stranger to me. I have never had any form of contact with him. And based on his many misstatements of fact and the false conclusions he has repeatedly drawn, he clearly does not understand my case. 

Not understanding, he should have refrained from commenting. Even if his intent was to "support" me, that is not relevant to the MAIN ISSUE. Which is: He has no right to publicize his assumptions about Barbara Hartwell, and promote this misinformation AS IF it were based on facts, which he has repeatedly done.]

"Hence it is all the more disturbing that Barbara Hartwell would attempt to undermine my work with a recent post in which she appears to have slanted information for her own use and left out much exculpatory information in regard to my harassment and those of others whom I have written about. And this is indicative of the criticisms that I have been reading about her on myriad other Websites which I have until now chosen to ignore. I am not going to waste any further time getting into a war of words with this person. At her request I have removed as many references to her as I have found and will continue to remove any others that I find. I respectfully ask that she do the same in regard to her latest post and I will be also delete this post as well. A war of words here isn't going to accomplish anything but to serve as a waste of time and effort."

[BH: Mr. Marino has made yet another false assumption. Will these assumptions never end? Correcting factual errors about myself and others; and stating my disagreement with Mr. Marino's politics, beliefs and opinions; stating that I do NOT want my name attached to his website, does NOT constitute an attempt to "undermine" his "work". But since his "work" is something I cannot in good conscience endorse, I have every right to make that clear. I HAVE made that clear. What, in this simple position, does he NOT understand?]

"Ms. Hartwell says that I never mention "WHY" the FEDS have attacked me which is yet another lie. I have clearly stated on myriad occasions that I believe it was an FBI agent by the name of Raymond Migliore who has done so, waging his own personal vendetta against me while violating my Civil Rights under the color of law statutes in this country. His reason for doing so is a perceived wrong doing in regard to one of his family members which is clearly erroneous and could easily be cleared up if this person and I were both willing to take a polygraph in which to do so. I have in fact already volunteered to do so, yet have never been taken up on my challenge because the FEDS know that I am telling the truth. And their illegal attacks on my person have only served to make each agent who has conspired to do so complicit in a criminal conspiracy."

[BH: Again, I have not gone through Mr. Marino's website and writings with a fine-tooth comb. I don't have the time, nor ever had the interest. I have simply noted that Mr. Marino rants on and on about "the FEDS", mostly with emotional name-calling, while in most of the articles containing his personal testimony, he does not furnish any background information which would clarify the reasons for the persecution he claims he has been targeted for.

Are the readers just supposed to take all this on faith? Only a fool would give unquestioned credibility to everything they read on the Internet, or elsewhere. Speaking for myself, I analyze everything I read, as well as using my intuition and spiritual/intellectual/moral discernment.

Mr. Marino is not a government whistleblower, nor is he even a high-profile target of any government agency. I doubt that most people, inside or outside government intelligence/law enforcement have ever heard of him. He claims to be an "alternate journalist"; a "mind control target"; a "target of a "failed COINTELPRO sting operation."

He also has repeatedly stated that he has been targeted for "27 years", and in some cases, "30 years", yet I have personally never seen any cogent explanation from Mr. Marino as to WHY this would be so. I won't belabor this point, because it really does not concern me. What DOES concern me is only that Mr. Marino is now libeling me and making patently false accusations against me.]

"The FEDS are not allowed to go on open ended "surveillance" fishing expeditions for years on end, yet that is exactly what they did in my case; a situation which may well turn out to be the worst violation of Civil Rights in US History!"

[BH: He's entitled to his opinion re his own case. I don't share it, and, as a trained intelligence analyst, I believe Mr. Marino is overinflating his own importance where the "feds" are concerned.]

"In regard to my post on activist Rick Stanley, I wrote about far more than just his defense of the Second Amendment and anyone who has read the posts that I have written about Rick would clearly see that.

I also experience great sorrow for Rick, his wife and the Stanley Family for what was in my opinion an extremely unjust conviction. And I also disagree with Ms. Hartwell's statement that Rick was not setup for a COINTELPRO STING. It was clear from the information that I have seen that Rick was definitely setup for such a sting operation because of his association with a militia and his attempts to enforce the US Constitution. After all he does refer to himself as a Constitutional Activist."

[BH: I merely corrected Mr. Marino's false (and utterly foolish and trivializing) statement that Rick Stanley was arrested merely for wanting the government to "ease up on gun laws".  As I explained in my report, there are no constitutional "gun laws."

I can assure everyone reading this that Mr. Marino does not know enough about Rick Stanley's case to make such a statement about an alleged "COINTELPRO sting operation", especially AS IF IT WERE FACT.

I have known Rick Stanley as a friend and ally for two and a half years, but my knowledge of his case predated that.

I have spoken to him many times about his case; I have personally researched the case, and have gained a thorough understanding of the facts of the case. I have read the legal summaries (some of which are not published) sent to me directly by Rick. Rick has published many of my reports in his newsletter, and I have been a guest on his radio program, Standing Up For America.

In addition to this, some of the same corrupt FBI agents (FBI Division 5) from Colorado had been involved in persecutions of myself and others, going back to the late 90s. The Joint Terrorism Task Force also included operatives from local law enforcement in Denver, Colorado. Anyone who wants information on that may find it in my Denver Connection series, as well as other reports on my website.

I know Rick --and his case-- well enough to state that he was NOT the target of a so-called "COINTELPRO sting operation", as Mr Marino continues to allege.

And I know Rick Stanley to be a hard-core freedom fighter, a Defender of Liberty, par excellence. He KNOWS the Constitution and what the Declaration of Indepence and Bill of Rights actually stand for.

The same cannot be said for James Marino, as evidenced by his many comments on issues he clearly does not understand. To minimize Rick's situation, as Mr. Marino has done ("easing up on gun laws") does nothing to "support" true patriots and Defenders of Liberty. On the contrary, such statements insult and undermine not only the defenders of Liberty, but the very ideals and principles on which this country was founded.

Again, Mr. Marino is entitled to his opinions, but it has become obvious to me that he is operating not only out of ignorance, but also from his own bias, in which he seems to be projecting his personal beliefs and feelings onto others.]

"As for God Given Rights, not every person on this planet believes in Ms. Hartwell's God. There are many who do not. So in making such an assumption Ms. Hartwell automatically assumes that every person does so. Many people believe in a greater force than ourselves which cannot be clearly defined as a God. It is human religious indoctrination that has allowed for the acceptance of such a God. And it is also clear that anyone who adopts this indoctrination will vociferously defend it, even though there is no clear empiracle evidence of the existence of such a God.

Many people have begun to see religions (including the better known ones) as nothing more than successful cults having reached nearly sacrosanct status. Yet if one does their own research into these religions they oftentimes find many unpleasant facts about them which their parishoners know nothing about."

[BH: Again, Mr. Marino's profound ignorance surfaces. He makes statements which are completely irrelevant to the issue at hand.

The term "God-given rights" (in the common law, on which the Constitution is based) refers to "natural rights", "unalienable" rights, "inherent" rights on which the constitutional guarantee and protection of those rights depends. 

Rights are NOT bestowed by government, nor by the Constitution of that government. They come directly from "God", the Almighty, the Creator.

It is all that simple.

I have "assumed" nothing, certainly not about what "God" anyone believes in. "God" is simply a term, and does not explicitly nor implicitly have a meaning connected to any form of organized religion. It is a generally agreed upon term, which in this case relates to the rights of the Individual under the Rule of Law.

Religion has nothing to do with this issue. Nor does what "many people believe" make a damn bit of difference. The point is, "God-given" rights are the Natural, Unalienable, Inherent Individual Sovereignty which is the birthright of every person. EVERY PERSON, regardless of religion or lack thereof; regardless of belief in "God", or lack thereof.

The Rule of Law, under the Constitution, does not change according to the "beliefs" held by anyone. It simply "guarantees and protects" the unalienable rights of the individual.

These unalienable "God-given" rights are NOT the same as "civil rights", as Mr. Marino seems to mistakenly believe.

Mr. Marino REALLY needs to do some research on this, as he has shown himself to be utterly clueless regarding the issues on which he is presenting his arguments.

And anyone who would "appeal" to the United Nations, or promote this organization, as Mr. Marino has done, is living in La La Land.]

"Ms. Hartwell also makes many other libelous statements in regard to my support of others including Ken Adachi. However, just because I have a link to Adachi's Website does not mean that I fully support him. His site contains many articles which I do support. As for Bob Shultz of the We The People Foundation, I was not aware that he had actually taken part in a hunger strike and will correct this information on the appropriate article."

[BH: Nowhere have I ever "libeled" James Marino. I doubt he even knows what constitutes libel, but I won't waste my time enlightening him.

If Mr. Marino was "not aware" of the facts in the case of Bob Schultz, what was he doing writing reports about it and thus making misstatements of fact? What kind of "research" is Mr. Marino conducting? Who/what are his sources? Perhaps he's been "educating himself "at Ken Adachi's site. Sure seems that way.]

"As for my posts in regard to Aaron Russo, Aaron was an insider for quite sometime and he himself even referred to himself as a "bad kid" when he was younger. And he has shown so many of us, that people can and do change for the better if given the chance. His documentary on the Federal Reserve and IRS frauds is superb, and clearly demonstrates Aaron's ability to do good work and to help humankind."

[BH: I repeat: Aaron Russo was NEVER any kind of "insider" connected to the government, organized crime, Illuminati, nor other such cabals. Admitting to being a "bad kid" does not make someone an "insider". Nor has Aaron Russo ever stated in any public form of media, that he was an "insider".

Mr. Marino really needs to educate himself on many issues and on many levels. As it is, he is just shooting his mouth off, parroting what he's read or heard, and then jumping to erroneous conclusions, which he unfortunately publishes. He then goes so far as to DEFEND his false assumptions, even after they have been corrected with the facts.]

"As for my compassion for the Virginia Tech shooter, that was in no way meant to defend the horrific thing that he did. I did in fact state (which Ms. Hartwell also chose to leave out) that it was the use of psychological warfare on this young man which drove him into such a rage that he became the monster that he did. And I also compared the rage that this young man experienced to what TI's are put through each day, by those monsters within the US Federal Government and our own communities who use "psychological warfare" to drive us to such states."

"The people who perpetrate these psychological operations know exactly what they are doing and expect to see a violent reaction as a result of them. Then they will accuse those whom they have attacked of being violent, when it was the perpetrators of these "operations" who were responsible for creating the violence in those whom they were targeting all along."
 
"This situation has become a serious problem in the modern day in which government sanctioned groups of organized stalkers (which in many cases now include entire communities) take part in these vicious attacks against those whom the government cannot arrest legally."

"This is a barbarian type of behavior by people who claim to be civilized, yet by their nefarious actions clearly no longer are."

[BH: I've already addressed this issue in my report. Nobody in their right mind would ever "condone" such an act, so why Mr. Marino feels the need to drag all this in is anybody's guess. The fact of the matter is, Mr. Marino DID express "sympathy" for the monster, and became an apologist for him in so doing.

And my position remains the same: This perp could have been taken out, had the people been ARMED. Marino can have all the "compassion" he wants, it won't change the fact that when people are prevented BY THE GOVERNMENT from defending themselves against violent criminals, the purported "reasons why" someone became a monster are secondary. The RIGHT TO LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS includes the RIGHT TO SELF DEFENSE.]

"As for the "latest news" in regard to the Federal Reserve Bank Fraud, anyone who read "The Creature From Jekyl Island" has known about it for quite sometime.

However this information does come as a shock to those who have recently learned about it, given the trillions of dollars that the Federal Reserve has stolen from the American people since 1913."

 [BH: So what? Why trot this out, it is completely irrelevant.]

"And Ms. Hartwell also expresses disapproval of Barack Obama for President. He could hardly do worse that the Nazi sympathizer that we have in there now, or Hillary Clinton, who has done nothing for New Yorkers since getting elected 6 years ago.

I recently wrote that I am supporting Texas Congressman Ron Paul, however Ms. Hartwell did not bother to mention that. I should also state that I seriously doubt that Ron Paul will ever get elected, simply because he stands for meaningful change in this country; something that most of Congress is vehemently against."

[BH: I simply stated in my report that Mr. Marino was vociferously endorsing Barack Obama. And that this was one reason I did NOT endorse his website. I won't argue politics with Marino, that is NOT the issue. I don't care what Mr. Marino's bleeding heart liberal beliefs are, nor do I care who he endorses or supports, including Barack Obama, Ron Paul, or the Man in the Moon. Doesn't he get it?]

"Heaven forbid any American attempting to criticize the status quo in this country without risking the US Government's PitBull Agencies FBI, DHS and CIA attacking them.

As for taking this situation any further than this post, I have no intention to. Ms.Hartwell is already far too busy fighting with the likes of numerous others who continue to post negative statements in regard to her. I will not join these people in demonizing Ms. Hartwell because I don't believe that she deserves that; however I no longer support her or her Website. There are far too many people on the Internet carrying on these flaming wars and such attacks are simply not worth the time."

[BH: Mr. Marino, you truly are a presumptuous fool.

Marino has NO IDEA what I am "busy" doing. It certainly isn't "fighting" with any of the people he mentions. I have no contact with them at all, nor do I engage in arguments, discussions, or debates with them. I have simply EXPOSED them in my reports. Period. As for joining these other fools and liars in demonizing Barbara Hartwell, he already has.

But at least it's a relief to know he no longer supports me or my website. With "supporters" like Marino, who needs enemies?

Barbara Hartwell
August 12, 2007]

"As for the information that I have posted on my Website in regard to the "mind control" and illegal spying by the NSA that I have experienced for decades, as well as the FEDS' attacks on myself and my Family, I stand by everything that I have written in regard to such attacks as this information is the absolute truth. And this also includes the FEDS' demonization campaign which they have been waging against me for the past four years (and is getting worse by the day). They simply don't want the truth about the outrageous crimes that they have perpetrated against us being publicized on a large scale. And one day they will pay dearly for the damage that they have caused my beloved Family and self. This I promise them.

As for Geral W. Sosbee, I still agree with his work regarding the dissolution of the FBI and CIA, however I would prefer that he remove any references to my Website including the banner on his main page. I have removed most references to Geral (with the exception of a letter that I wrote to the ACLU in regard to my harassment in which I mentioned his name as well as Barbara Hartwell's in efforts to illustrate the complete absence of justice in this country for those who are attacked by agencies of the US Intelligence Community). I will continue to do so as I find them."

Respectfully,
Jim Marino

ORIGINAL POST BY JAMES MARINO TO WHICH GERAL SOSBEE RESPONDED

 

Unfortunate Turn Of Events

"To Whom It May Concern:

In the past I have given a great deal of moral support to bothGeral W. Sosbee and Barbara Hartwell -- two former US Intelligence operatives who became whistle blowers when they saw crimes being committed within their respective agencies.

I have also given Geral Sosbee $750 to maintain his Website; Geral himself has acknowledged that I am the only person to have ever given him any monies in efforts to help him promulgate his information.

Moreover, I have never once been anything but kind and supportive of both of these people in efforts to understand their predicaments while they (by their own accounts) have been treated viciously by so many others.

Hence it is all the more disturbing that Barbara Hartwell would attempt to undermine my work. And this is indicative of what I have been reading about her on myriad other Websites. I am not going to waste any time getting into a war of words with this person. At her request I have removed as many references to her as I have found and will continue to remove any others that I find. I respectfully ask that she do the same in regard to her latest post.

There are far too many people on the Internet carrying on these flaming wars and such attacks are simply not worth the time. As for the information that I have posted on my Website in regard to the "mind control" and illegal spying by the NSA that I have experienced for decades, as well as the FEDS' attacks on myself and my Family, I stand by everything that I have written in regard to such attacks as this information is the absolute truth. And this also includes the FEDS' demonization campaign which they have been waging against me for the past four years. They simply don't want the truth about the outrageous crimes that they have perpetrated against us being publicized on a large scale.

As for Geral W. Sosbee, I still support his work. However, I would also ask that he remove any references to my Website including the banner on his main page.

Respectfully,
Jim Marino"

Correcting Misinformation & Retracting Recommendation: James Marino

The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation.

--Henry David Thoreau

This report is one I was hoping I would not find it necessary to write. But considering the fact that misinformation is being disseminated, I have had no choice.

This concerns misinformation being regularly promoted in the form of erroneous assumptions, misstatements of fact and general inaccuracies about Barbara Hartwell and certain others (some of whom are my friends/allies); specifically being reported by James Marino, owner of a website called 9-11 The Mother of All Black Operations.

I should preface my comments by saying that I believe Mr. Marino basically "means well" and that I see no indication that there has been any malice intended toward myself or others. Nonetheless, this misinformation is damaging and I must set the record straight.

In a typical example, in one report, Mr. Marino states that former government agents Barbara Hartwell and Geral Sosbee have been "forced to lead lives of quiet desperation."

"Quiet desperation"?

Nothing could be further from the truth! "Quiet desperation" is the province of cowards and fools, those who feel themselves to be powerless against the forces who would oppress/enslave/tyrannize, etc.

Speaking for myself, I am (and have always been) a hard-core freedom fighter, and very vocal in defending Liberty, Individual Rights/Sovereignty as bestowed by God. That has been my main focus in life, as far back as I can remember, beginning in childhood. Anyone who really knows me can attest to this fact, certainly including my friend and professional colleague Geral Sosbee.

And although I've been a journalist for over 30 years (including most of the time I was still inside CIA), my activism has not been limited to the written word. I have always backed up my words with action and I have never been afraid to face the perps (government or other) directly or do battle with them, even on their turf. This is a matter of honor and always will be.

The same, in terms of honorably standing for Liberty and against tyranny, can be said for ex-FBI Geral Sosbee. In fact, I have discussed this issue with Geral and he too finds this statement completely inaccurate and disturbing, as well as insulting. No "quiet desperation", ever, in either case.

Mr. Marino is clearly "editorializing" and rather than sticking to the facts, he is merely expressing his subjective personal opinions, which in a number of his statements, misrepresents the truth and places the people he is writing about in a "false light".

I don't have the time to include every such false statement made in Mr. Marino's various reports and commentaries. Suffice it to say there have been quite a few, regarding myself and others.

But just a few more examples should bring to light the danger of making assumptions about the lives and experiences of others, especially when such inaccurate statements are made public, via dissemination on the World Wide Web.

In one such instance, Mr.Marino states that Rick Stanley (my friend and fellow defender of Liberty) was arrested and incarcerated because he just wanted the government to "ease up on gun laws."

Again, nothing could be further from the truth! Rick Stanley is unlawfully incarcerated today because he EXERCISED his God-given, unalienable, Constitutionally protected and guaranteed rights.

There are no constitutional "gun laws". The Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land. All other so-called "laws", those which are UNconstitutional, are unlawful, and thus do not qualify as "laws".

He also stated that Rick Stanley was targeted for a "COINTELPRO sting operation". That is also untrue. He has made this same inaccurate statement about various others.

In another misstatement of fact, James Marino, in promoting Aaron Russo's film, America Freedom to Fascism, claimed that Mr. Russo was a former "insider." Aaron Russo has never been an insider, not from government or otherwise. Certainly not simply because he once had an acquaintance from the Rockefeller/Rothschild clan who spoke to him about some "insider" information. Yet that was the erroneous assumption made.

Aaron Russo is in fact simply a courageous person who did his own investigations, especially re the Fed Reserve/"federal income taxes." As a film maker whose name is well known, and who had the resources to produce his documentary, he has done a great job in bringing the truth to light about these issues. I recommend his film to the general public, especially those who have yet to learn the truth about these fraudulent and unconstitutional practices by the government.

As for those of us who were ACTUAL insiders, we have known the truth about all this for decades. Trouble was, nobody would listen when we exposed what we knew. None of us that I know of had the resources to produce such a film.

Now, things have changed. More people are ready and willing to listen. And Aaron Russo has made a tremendous contribution in exposing fascism and defending Liberty. But my point is, the way Mr. Marino presented this was as if Russo's film were some sort of "news flash" to everyone in America from a "former insider". Not so.

Then, there was a comment about Bob Schultz of We the People. James Marino stated that Schultz "threatened" to go on a hunger strike. The fact is, Mr. Schultz DID INDEED go on a lengthy hunger strike and quite possibly could have expired from it.

Mr. Marino's comments often minimize and/or trivialize the actions of Liberty activists and thus misrepresent what they really stand for. In my opinion, Mr. Marino needs to get the facts straight and gain a true understanding of the issues he addresses before reporting on them.

I first heard of James Marino (2005) because he had been in contact with my friend Geral Sosbee, and had written some reports including both our names in connection with the persecution being directed against us by the FBI/CIA et al.

The reports I saw beginning at that time contained no misinformation, they merely seemed supportive of myself and Geral Sosbee. And we both appreciated it.

But it is important to state that James Marino does not know me personally. I have never met him, spoken to him, nor even exchanged e-mail with him.  

Consequently, the only factual information Mr. Marino could have access to about Barbara Hartwell would be that contained in my own reports on the Internet (from 1995-2007.) Yet he has presumed to speak about me (and even for me) using nothing more than false assumptions, conjecture and speculation about my background, experiences, and even my feelings.

If Mr. Marino truly wants to "support" others (including myself and Geral Sosbee) he should stick to verifiable facts which come directly from the sources, using their documented writings. Or perhaps he might just post the reports written by those he wishes to support or promote and leave the readers to draw their own conclusions.

For a short time, I had a link to Mr. Marino's site posted on my website, Barbara Hartwell vs. CIA. I removed it several months ago, after I realized that a great deal of misinformation (including speculation, conjecture, false assumptions and the like) was being promoted there, about myself and others (including but not limited to the above examples).

It was also disturbing to me that my name was often included in Mr. Marino's personal accounts of the harassment he claims he is targeted for, when in fact, judging from his reports, there are few similarities regarding the tactics --or even the purported REASONS for the persecution.

Anyone who wants information regarding my own case (including the specific types of persecution directed against me and the reasons for being targeted) needs only to read my reports. They may make of them what they will. My reports are for information purposes only. 

I don't engage in communication with the public, nor do I discuss the issues with anyone publicly on message boards or via e-mail groups. Neither am I interested in "feedback" from readers about my writings. For this reason, I do not have a public e-mail address.

I do not know Mr. Marino. I do not know his background (professional or otherwise); nor do I have any idea WHY he has been targeted. I've never seen anything in his reports which explains this to the readers. I certainly was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, but I would need much more information in order to assess his situation and to determine what I believe to be true.

But there were also other reasons why I decided I could not in good conscience continue to endorse this website.

Mr. Marino has promoted certain individuals, such as Barack Obama (I hope I don't need to comment as to why this guy is bad news!); Ken Adachi's website, Educate-Yourself (Adachi is a government stooge/shill for ex-FBI agent, COINTELPRO Ted Gunderson, a malicious liar who has libeled Barbara Hartwell and Geral Sosbee for years); Sherry Shriner (government stooge and liar, nutcase who has libeled/slandered Hartwell and Sosbee); Walter Bowart (con man, scam artist, who stole $100.00 from Barbara Hartwell in 1998 in a mail fraud operation and has stolen same from many others). And these are only a few examples (none of whom are legitimate or credible) of who is being promoted on this website.

Mr. Marino has also promoted the United Nations, via "appeals" to the U.N., in the form of petitions to be signed by "activists". The U.N. is among the most dangerous criminal organizations in the world --to anyone who loves Liberty and values Individual Sovereignty, that is, as well as National Sovereignty. The U.N. has absolutely NO BUSINESS interfering in the lives of Americans. They have been a collectivist, communist organization from Day One and are just another tentacle of the NWO Octopus. Perhaps Mr. Marino is unaware of this, but in any case, "appealing" to the U.N. is NOT something I would ever suggest for anyone, for any reason. They're the "baddest" of the bad guys --in spades!

In what might have been the "last straw", Mr. Marino expressed "sympathy" for the Virginia Tech murderer, becoming an apologist for a monster, citing the possibility that he may been a "targeted individual" i.e. stalked/harassed.

All I can say is, if the people had been ARMED, lives could have been saved by just one bullet with the perp's name on it!

In summary, I must state that I am in vehement disagreement with many of Mr. Marino's personal opinions, beliefs; with his politics, and with his general world view, as presented on his website.

I do not want my name connected to this website and I hereby respectfully request that Mr. Marino REMOVE all material using my name.

As to the reason why I had no choice but to confront these issues, Mr. Marino has been reposting an endorsement I wrote for his website BEFORE I was aware that he was engaging in speculation and promoting misinformation (even if unintended) about myself and others.

Furthermore, since Mr. Marino stated that he was a regular reader of my website (and took reports from my site and posted them on his own, often adding his commentaries), I believe he had to have been fully aware that I removed the link to his website months ago.

As well, I must reasonably assume that he knew that I had removed all reports which made reference to Mr. Marino and those which included his comments/writings.

In fact, on the very same day that I finally removed all the reports, Mr. Marino reposted one of them on the front page of his website, less than an hour later. I don't see this as a "coincidence".

It was my prerogative to remove the link to his website, and all reports which referenced him. He should have respected my decision, and it should have been obvious to him that for whatever reasons, I did not want any association with his writings or website.

Instead, he has now posted what appears to be a PERMANENT link on the sidebar of his site with my statement recommending his website.

I hereby RETRACT this recommendation (given below, as posted by James Marino). I do NOT endorse this website, nor any of the material on it.

For Mr. Marino to post this, in light of the fact that he KNOWS I have removed all material and links connected to him is an act of disrespect and aggression.

I have no malice in my heart against him and I sincerely wish him well. But if he truly wants to "support" targets of government persecution, or to "expose" this persecution, then he needs to start dealing in facts; to stop making unfounded assumptions, including that all cases are like his own; to learn the difference between "civil rights" and God-given rights as protected and guaranteed under the Constitution. To stop promoting the United Nations. To stop being an apologist for evildoers. And most importantly, to respect the personal boundaries of others, as I'm sure he would like his own to be respected.

POSTED BY JAMES MARINO & HEREBY RETRACTED BY BARBARA HARTWELL

["I would also like to thank James Marino, another person who has been targeted for many years of persecution by FBI. Jim has posted many comments in support of both Geral and myself, over a period of years. I have perused Jim's website and have found many articles which I believe are valuable in educating the general public about electronic harassment and government mind control operations. Jim also writes his own reports about the persecution being directed at himself and others. I recommend Jim's site, especially for targeted individuals from all walks of life who may want to learn more about the government's M.O. and tactics." -- Barbara Hartwell Former CIA (NOC,Psychological Operations) Government Whistle Blower]

James Marino responds: "You're welcome Barbara -- and thank you for endorsing my Website. I have documented as best as I am able to, the outrageous violations of my civil rights and more importantly my Family's, by FBI/NSA and more recently DHS agents under the color of law. As a long-term target of COINTELPRO and the NSA's illegal and unethical "mind control" operations, my site has much to offer in the way of exposing these crimes against humanity. Your average American thinks that the FBI in particular is an agency loaded with good Americans who are honest professionals who are better than they are. If they only knew the truth. However, to learn the truth about the US Intelligence community when you are a former operative or someone who's been targeted by them, comes at a very high price, since you now understand the complete fraud under which they operate (a secret police force like Hitler's former SS or the former KGB) -- something they do not take kindly to. Your information on CIA crimes continues to benefit those whom are willing to hear the truth -- sadly, most are still not ready to -- their loss. Furthermore, when you have agencies -- for instance the NSA -- using its audio/visual satellites to illegally and remotely spy on millions of Americans without their knowledge or consent, it portends the fascistic nightmare that is yet to come in the United States. A Hellish situation which as it continues to unfold, grows more imminent by the day. The situation is what it is and it's not going to improve until the American people understand what this government is covertly doing to them. At least some of us know the truth about how these satellites are used to spy on, torture and manipulate the minds of those whom these agencies illegally target. And for the time being that's going to have to be good enough."