Rhetorical invocations
of Nazi evil aside, Gunderson could be found at a 2006 historical
revisionist/Holocaust denier conference for the American Free
Press/Barnes Review. A post-conference report describes the wine &
cheese social where their “old friend” Ted was in attendance, as
well as a “Mr. Theo Junker […] former member of the Wiking
division of the S.S. who,” the author of the report gushes,
“courageously opened a Museum in Wisconsin dedicated to the memory
of Adolf Hitler. It was indeed one of the highlights of the
conference meeting this courageous patriot who continues to fight the
good fight well into his 80’s. God bless you, Herr Junker!”
Defending the FBI’s
use of Civil Liberty violating investigation techniques, such as
wiretapping, mail opening, and surreptitious entries, he [Gunderson]
would claim, “When we had the counterintelligence effort called
Cointelpro going in the ‘50s and ‘60s, [these methods] helped
break the backs of people dropping bombs everywhere and wrecking
millions of dollars worth of property. Extreme tactics were needed if
we were to stop them.”
--On Ted Gunderson,
excerpts from Death of a Public Paranoid
http://www.process.org/discept/2012/07/31/ted-gunderson-death-of-a-public-paranoid/
"If
Satan himself, with all of his super-human genius and diabolical
ingenuity at his command, had tried to create a permanent
disintegration and force for the destruction of the nations, he could
have done no better than to invent the Jews."
– Willis
Carto, Editor of American Free Press
The
American Free Press (AFP) is a publication launched by Willis Carto,
who previously published Spotlight magazine through his now-defunct
Liberty Lobby, an organization which worked with racist
segregationists and neo-Nazi holocaust deniers. AFP was launched by
Carto in August 2001 following the court-ordered closure of
Spotlight.
Many of the staff of Spotlight
continued on with American
Free Press.
Carto
continues to publish deceptive materials in which history is treated
as a huge Jewish conspiracy. During the war with Iraq, for example,
his Barnes Review attempted
to exploit anti-war sentiment by publishing fake whistleblower memos
on media bias in the Iraq war, which cast the Iraq war as a
conspiracy by "Jews who run the media
and government."
SOURCE
WATCH DOT ORG
From
The Barnes Review (published by American Free Press):
Adolf
Hitler: An Overlooked Candidate for the Nobel Prize
“If
anyone deserved the Nobel Peace Prize, it was Adolf Hitler. Hitler
did not want war. World War II was forced on Germany.”
HAPPY
BIRTHDAY ADOLF HITLER!
– Banner
on Rense dot com, published by Jeff Rense, longtime promoter of Ted
Gunderson (April 2015)
Excerpts
from Hartwell reports:
Ted Gunderson is not only
acknowledged in many public articles as "AFP correspondent",
but his name appears on the paper's hardcopy masthead in an official
capacity.
Longtime Gunderson crony (and Jew-hater) Anthony
Hilder, has also been a "correspondent" for AFP.
The
Spotlight magazine (which has since become the American Free Press)
claims Gunderson as a CEO (or something along those lines). But that
fact is not promoted; nor do most of the readers know that COINTELPRO
Ted Gunderson is responsible for much of the disinformation
disseminated in the newspaper.
Personally,
I don't read it, and never have done. But I have looked through
copies, left with me by friends who thought it was a respectable
newspaper. And although I tried to persuade them otherwise, they
didn't listen and continued to subscribe.
What
I find most disturbing about American Free Press (formerly
Spotlight) is the Jew-bashing that is the trademark of the paper. I
am no supporter of Zionism, nor the ADL. I also hate the political
atrocities committed by Mossad and the Zionist state of Israel.
(Just
like I hate the political atrocities committed by FBI, CIA and the
U.S. Government.)
But
I do not approve of any sort of generic hatred and demonizing of
Jews; nor can I condone the holocaust deniers who claim that the Jews
were never persecuted; and who try to minimize the atrocities of the
Holocaust.
Ted
Gunderson, when I was still his friend and colleague, tried to get me
involved with the Spotlight (run by Mike Blair) and Free World
Alliance (Anthony Hilder), but I refused. And I did see, firsthand,
the type of propaganda pieces which Gunderson considered “news
stories”.
"I
can also understand your sudden determination to distance yourself
from Timothy Patrick White, and aversion to posting substantive
responses to my previous request to you to “come clean”
in-so-far-as your ties to Gunderson, White, Millar, Szymanski,
Nicoloff, and Phelps.
You
have all published e-mails and articles referencing your similarly
racist ideologies, that appear to originate with Mr. Phelps, best
explaining your group’s “anti-Khazar”, “anti-Zionist,” and
widely perceived to be “anti-Jewish,” rantings. Since you are
only one member of this obviously well-organized and outspoken libel
and harassment team, you are unable to provide the relief necessary
to remedy much of anything, since everything published is already
archived and circulated in the public domain.
FYI,
all such attacks against Sherri Kane and myself are transparent and
stupid, far more degrading to you, than me. You and your allies’
allegations... [are] ludicrous, especially considering the weight of
evidence being advanced to your disadvantage.
Every
reasonably intelligent reader of your team’s libelous propaganda
can only conclude your evasion of Ted Gunderson’s handwritten
letter to Barbara Hartwell, and other substantive material facts as
stated above, indicts you and undermines any good you think you are
doing, offensively or defensively."
--Dr.
Leonard Horowitz, to Alma Ott aka “Dr. A. True Ott”,
Gunderson
crony,
white
supremacist, Jew-hater extraordinaire
“Stop
hating. Stop judging. Stop discriminating.”
– Dave
Champion, host of Dave Champion's Liberty
Please
read PARTS ONE and TWO before continuing. They are parts of a whole
and not meant to stand alone.
In
PART THREE of the series, I will cover the topic of racism, bigotry
and white supremacism, which has become alarmingly prevalent among
those who call themselves “patriots” and “truth tellers”.
Some
of the characters named here have been operating in a loose-knit
network, for a number of years, but have one commonality: They were
under the tutelage or influence (one way or another) of the late FBI
Chief Ted Gunderson, the COINTELPRO Kingpin who worked directly under
J. Edgar Hoover, from the inception of the FBI's primary
counterintelligence operations, targeting American citizens as
dissidents, deemed enemies of the state.
These
“enemies” came from across a broad spectrum of political and/or
religious ideologies, and included the Black Panther Party, Dr.
Martin Luther King Jr., members of militia groups, American Indians
(Leonard Peltier et al), Constitutionalists, animal rights
organizations...you name it, they infiltrated, disrupted, sabotaged,
spread propaganda, with the objective being to “neutralize” their
Targets.
I
find it important to state that many of the individuals and groups
exposed here have self-identified as Christians. But what kind of
“Christian”?
Some call themselves “White Nationalists”. Some
have joined a group called “Christian Identity”. Some are members
of “Aryan Nations”, or Neo-Nazis, who promote Adolf Hitler as a
great leader, and can be heard on “patriot” radio shows, spouting
passages from Mein Kampf.
And some are just hidebound fundamentalist
religious zealots who, in my opinion, have no clue as to the genuine
message contained in the Gospel of Jesus Christ. They desecrate
Christ's message for self-serving ends, and as far as I am concerned
they “are of their father, the devil”.
Be that as it may, I
think it's safe to say that, whatever belief system they have
adopted, most of them bear a very real hatred against “The Jews”.
They are Holocaust-deniers, or as some describe themselves,
“historical revisionists”.
Many among the
Jew-hater mentality will stand in staunch defense of Ted Gunderson,
claiming that their adversaries are CIA, FBI, Mossad, or
“crypto-Jews”, Zionists, etc. etc. I myself have been on the
receiving end of these libelous falsehoods for many years, simply for
exposing the rampant hatred and bigotry and taking a stand against
it.
So let me state for
the record that I adhere to none of these ideologies, nor do I
support any such groups or organizations. Very simply, I defend the
principle of God-given (natural) unalienable INDIVIDUAL rights for
all and sundry. Equal rights for all, special rights for none.
And although I am a
devout Christian, I have never attempted to impose my beliefs on
others. On the contrary, I respect the right of others to believe as
they will, as long as their beliefs do not compel them to infringe on
the rights of others, mine included.
In PART TWO of this
report, I had placed the spotlight on a man calling himself “Jim
How”. And though he himself is not well-known, but just one of
numerous loud-mouthed parrots of the “legitimacy” of Ted
Gunderson, his mentality certainly exemplifies the bigotry which
runs rampant in the siege on the unalienable rights and liberties of
the Individual.
After writing the last
report, I did some further research on this character, Jim How. As
painful as it was (I find stupidity excruciating), I forced myself to
watch a few more of his (thankfully, short) videos.
I was not surprised
when I learned that he is using a pseudonym. It seems that Jim labors
under some serious paranoia, in his belief that the government is
“out to get him” for his “truth telling”, as he described it
in more than one of his wild-eyed video rants.
But I'd rather let Jim
speak for himself.
Here are two
promotions on Jim's You Tube channel.
"I
discuss the "real" causes of the world's problems and
"real" solutions. The problem is religion. All religions
have flaws and the flaws of religion are the causes of most of the
evil in the world. The problem is most people cannot think outside of
the box and cannot see how their religion is causing problems. I am
not perfect, I have many flaws but I am one of the very few who can
think outside of the box and lead others to truth. Now, its just a
matter of convincing people and getting them to change their
behavior."
"I
am not fancy I just put out the truth. The whole truth and nothing
but the truth. I am conspiracy researcher. I attempt to go deeper
than anyone else, I peal the union to its core. If I make a mistake
(not as a rule) I attempt to set the record straight. Few have delved
as deep on these subjects. If you want to "know" this is
the place. If you don't want to know go back to the united press."
I
think Jim meant to say “peel the onion”, but “peal the union”
is close enough, I guess, for a functionally illiterate “conspiracy
researcher”.
Jim
talks about “getting people to change their behavior”. By what
means? By filling their ears with Jim's conspiracy theories? By
getting them to stop “demonizing Nazis”? (See PART TWO.) By
“educating” them with his videos? Small wonder then, that he is
promoted by Ken Adachi, on his disinformation site, 'Educate
Yourself', (otherwise known as “Indoctrinate Yourself”).
And
it seems to me that Jim's boast of being one of only a few who can
“think outside the box” (can there be a more trite phrase?), is
rather a function of the pathology whereby his thinking has actually
been reduced to a tiny corner of a very small box, from which he will
not be able to free himself unless he recognizes that he has been
heavily indoctrinated by the very system he claims to be “exposing”.
I
don't want to waste too much time on this paranoid conspiracy
theorist, and quoting further from him is really too much to bear, so
here are just a couple of titles from Jim's video collection on his
You Tube channel.
"Stupid
Goyim, Stupider Jews"
"Race
mixing doesn't work"
If
the titles don't speak for themselves, go right ahead and watch them.
Personally, I've subjected myself to all I can take of Jim How, the
anonymous coward and bigot, and his paranoid fantasies.
But
before moving along, here comes Ken Adachi (another coward using a
pseudonym), the primary PR shill for Ted L. Gunderson and his crew of
liars, toadies, stooges and minions.
Ken
Adachi posted the video (featured in PART TWO of this report) in
which Jim How “defended Ted”. Here is Adachi's comment:
"I
could keep going down the list, but one guy on Youtube (further
below) did a fair job of defending Ted against most of the idiotic
accusations invented by Stew Webb."
A
fair job? Adachi, as usual, lies. Go to PART TWO of this report to
see my rebuttal, or better yet, watch the video and decide for
yourself.
Speaking
of “idiotic accusations”, I repeat: go to Ken Adachi's website,
“Educate-Yourself”, see the idiot Jim How in action, on video,
which includes Jim's falsehoods about Barbara Hartwell (accusations
of fabricating/forgery of a letter from Ted Gunderson to me), whom he
is too cowardly to call by name.
Then,
there are the comments, posted on this issue. Here, a sample.
Jeneane
Zant:
"Not
sure if I trust that Barbara Hartwell person. Look at her bio on that
website. Claims to be a former member of the CIA, Black-Ops surivor,
now she's a big Christian "exposing" lies of the
government? I don't know if there's any "illuminati" crap
on her blog, but if there isn't then I guess I would trust her more
than Ted Gunderson."
Well,
why would anyone have reason to “trust” a person she does not
know? And what is a “big Christian”? I've been a Christian all
my life, and never made claims to be any “bigger” than anyone
else.
The
ignorance here is so very typical. She admits she does not know what
is on my website (like the possibility of “illuminati crap”?) Why
doesn't she take the time to read it, and come to her own
conclusions? Because she is apparently not capable of critical
thinking or analysis, she lets others decide what she will believe,
and seems to think she has to “take a side”, of “trusting”
either Barbara Hartwell or Ted Gunderson. More unadulterated
stupidity, to rival even the likes of Jim How.
Anonymous
Coward:
"That
"educate-yourself" site that Emcada linked me to tries to
"expose" her [Barbara Hartwell] as a "CIA disinfo
agent" and defends Gunderson. Although that educate yourself
site is full of alot of crazy stuff. Are there any links that can
confirm Gunderson's condition besides that blog? I wouldn't trust her
either, but Ted Gunderson being mentally unwell is fairly common
knowledge, it was just the first place I could find to show the
details."
Again,
the issue of “trust” is raised. By my standards, trust is earned,
not given blindly to any stranger who publishes on the Internet. And
for the record, I have not focused on Ted Gunderson's “mental”
issues. No, that is Stew Webb, who claims Ted was a “paranoid
schizophrenic”. I don't know if that is true, I have no evidence of
that, and have not commented on it, so I have no idea what “details”
are referenced here. But naturally, the rumors have been running
wild, about things I never said, issues I have not addressed.
But
speaking of Stew Webb, a longtime adversary of Ted Gunderson, he too
displays an appalling level of bigotry. As I remember, it started
during the time when Stew and Tom Heneghan had a radio show on the
Hal Turner Network. (See reports on this site for details on FBI
snitch, racist/bigot Hal Turner.)
Just
recently, I listened to one of Stew's radio shows, now being aired on
“Veterans Truth Network”. On this particular program (April 2015)
the topic was “Gordon Duff Roast”.
Stew
Webb started this new network after his affiliation with 'Veterans
Today', run by Gordon Duff, went bad.
On
the program with Stew were a few of the former 'columnists' and radio
hosts of VT.
I
won't bother going into the whole Gordon Duff extravaganza.
But
it does amaze me that anyone could be taken in by this absolutely
flagrant con man and propagandist. Duff himself has publicly admitted
to being a liar, to promoting “40% patently false information on
his website, and this was years ago, while Stew Webb was still
affiliated with VT. It didn't bother him then, so why the change of
heart?
But
here's my point. The former staff members of Veterans Today
(including one Dean Henderson, one Bruce Campbell, one Donald Fox,
and one Jim Fetzer) all had a profusion of anti-Jewish comments to
offer. One said he didn't trust Gordon Duff (get this) “because he
is a Jew.” Another (or maybe it was the same guy) gave quotes from
Mein Kampf, in support of the ideology of Adolf Hitler.
There
was more...but this statement, intoned after a weighty silence among
the broadcasters, summed it up: “We have a Jewish problem.”
So,
it's not so much that Gordon Duff is a liar, a con man, propagandist,
or any other such attribute. No, it is “a Jewish Problem”. Gordon
Duff is a Jew. Case closed.
Stew
Webb declared that he had been “duped” by Gordon Duff, whose real
name he claimed is Bob Foote. Stew went on to tell his audience (and
his ex-VT comrades) that he had only been “duped” three (3) times
in his life. The con men who duped him were: 1) Ted Gunderson 2) Tom
Heneghan 3) Gordon Duff.
I
almost fell off my chair laughing at this ridiculous statement. I
happen to know that there were many more than the three individuals
mentioned by Stew Webb.
For
one, an FBI agent named Mark Hostlaw. When I first knew Stew (2001),
he was involved with Hostlaw, whom he spoke with on a regular basis.
I told Stew that Hostlaw was not a “friend” and not to be
trusted, mark my words. I myself wanted nothing to do with Hostlaw,
and made that clear. Stew continued to harangue me about Hostlaw,
claiming he was trustworthy and “one of the good guys”.
Stew
wouldn't listen to me, and clearly had no respect for my wishes
regarding my refusal to have dealings with Hostlaw. He even went so
far as to make a conference call with Hostlaw, without my consent,
while I was on the line talking to Stew.
(Stew
made a habit of this. He would just start punching numbers in, and
suddenly, what I thought was a private conversation turned into a
party line, with people I did not know, and had no interest in
speaking with. This aggressive behavior, lacking all respect for the
wishes and personal boundaries of others, was typical of Stew's M.O.
Still is...)
As
for Hostlaw, once he came on the line I had nothing to say, except
within a few moments, Goodbye. This, after I was subjected to
Hostlaw's thinly veiled snide remarks about me – he knew who I was,
not because of an unwanted “introduction” by Stew Webb, but by
virtue of the fact that I was one of the Targets of FBI Division 5
out of Denver, where Hostlaw (former NSA, then FBI...but who's
counting?) ran his operations.
And
by the way, Hostlaw was one of the agents with whom career
criminal/predicate felon, notorious fed snitch, Tim White, made a
deal for a get-out-of-jail-free card, in exchange for harassing,
threatening, stalking, libeling/slandering Targets, including former
intelligence professionals/whistleblowers, journalists.
Shortly
thereafter, Stew went ballistic when he finally realized that Hostlaw
was exactly who I said he was, a government goon, when he discovered
that Hostlaw had tried to set him up in a murder-for-hire plot.
Damn!
You were right about Hostlaw! Sonofabitch! Damn!
(I
don't criticize Stew for his language, which was a lot more, let us
say... “colorful”, as I can curse up a storm as well as anyone.
I just try to avoid such language in my public reports.)
Then
, there was some crazy preacher (I don't remember his name) whom Stew
swore was for real, a “prophet”. I told Stew that this guy was no
Christian, but rather an imposter, and that he would try to harm
Stew, given the chance.
Sure
enough, Stew came back from a 'prayer meeting' with the guy after I
had practically begged him not to go (I feared for his safety), and
told me, You were right about the guy. Damn!
I
don't remember now exactly what happened, but Stew became violently
ill after the meeting and vowed never to have anything to do with
this character again.
And
so it went....time after time, Stew would get involved with extremely
unreliable persons (some predatory and dangerous), all with their own
agendas, none of which had anything to do with Stew Webb's stated
objectives of standing against corruption in government, or defending
the rights and liberties under assault by the government.
As
for Tom Heneghan, why would Stew continue to work with Heneghan for
at least SEVEN YEARS (2005-2012) before he saw the light? He may have
been duped, but he was sure as hell a willing and eager participant
in all of Heneghan's wild schemes, scams and hoaxes. I don't believe
Stew Webb to be that stupid. In fact, not stupid at all. But
definitely very misguided, lacking in discernment, and unprincipled.
His
alliance with Tom Heneghan was the beginning of the end of my
association with Stew Webb. Very simply, I refuse to get involved
with liars, con men and shills, nor to associate with anyone (friend
or not) who teams up with them. For this reason, I have lost many
friends over the years, people I truly cared for (including Stew
Webb) and it has been heartbreaking. But as always, it is a matter of
principle.
But
back to the issue of the “Jewish problem”. Around 2012, Stew
began an association with yet another extremely aggressive, ambitious
and dishonest character, Glenn Canady, who has served as Stew's
minion ever since.
Canady
promotes Stew Webb as if he and his “patriotism” were the saving
grace of America. Anything Stew says, Canady parrots, and then
spreads all over the Internet on social media sites, while also
indiscriminately attacking anyone who does not agree with Stew Webb's
political agenda, which of course changes every few months, not on
principle, but to accommodate “what the market will bear”.
It's
all about the publicity, it's all about the money that can be
extracted from “patriots” who are gullible enough to buy into the
various schemes touted , which will “save America”.
Canady,
unsurprisingly, is a salesman, who promotes his get-rich-quick schemes
and “guerilla marketing” (I teach Patriots to make up to $10,000
a month! Call me! I will help you!) on all his sites and on the radio
broadcasts on his You Tube channel.
(Question:
If Canady is so flush with cash, why doesn't he himself contribute to
Stew Webb's fundraising drives to Save America? Considering that he
is broadcasting out of his mother's basement, what overhead could he
possibly have to worry about?)
Canady
too, boasts of being a Christian and claims he is “risking his
life” with his evangelism.
Here
is just one example of Canady's “godly” messages.
Glenn
Canady:
"Trust
No One that doesn't talk about the fake Jews. If they don't they are
an agent of these fake Jews and are there to waste your time, take
your money and make sure you never learn the shocking truth. They
will blame everybody but the fake Jew zionists. They'll blame it all
on the "Democrats", "Progressives", "Globalists",
"Liberals", or the "Bilderbergs". We must all
learn more about these fake Jews and the lies we've been told as
Christians.
Shame
on all of you supporting those not discussing the fake jews while you
let the patriots putting out the truth on them struggle to pay the
bills to host the network! All of you doing this will be guilty of
being a traitor to humanity if we do end up in the fake Jew FEMA
camps because you supported their fake jew mouth pieces so the truth
couldn't go viral!"
Could
this guy be any more ridiculous (or obnoxious) in his exhortations?
According to this parading buffoon, anyone who does not talk about
the “fake jew zionists” is one of their “agents”.
That
would be millions upon millions of people, wouldn't it? Where are all
these agents? Where do they live? And why don't we hear anything from
them? Because, according to Canady, they are not talking.
The
“patriots putting out the truth” about the Jews (those on
“Veterans Truth Network”, hosted by none other than “federal
whistleblower” Stew Webb) are struggling to pay the bills! YOU are
guilty of being a TRAITOR to humanity if you don't SEND MONEY NOW!!!!
The
exact same idiocy, the same hype, was being promoted by Glenn Canady
about Gordon Duff (a multi-millionaire) and Veterans Today (another
motley crew of Jew-haters), that is, until Stew Webb left that
network.
But
there's more...
Another
promotion of Stew Webb et al by Glenn Canady, this one about Ted
Gunderson. This was posted on the New Age/government disinfo site,
Rumor Mill News, by one of the morons using the screen name
“Lymerick”. (Whoever it is often posts such idiocy from Glenn
Canady and his ilk.)
This
FBI Cointelpro Agent Fooled Entire Alternative Media and YOU!
Excerpt:
"These
are two very important interviews that shatter the myth and
completely expose the king troll of the FBI COINTELPRO program who
infiltrated the entire alternative media and fooled almost everybody
including me at one point or another! When I first woke up I saw this
man give a talk in Pensacola, Florida. He said he was a “retired”
FBI agent and he was now exposing the “truth” but as you’ll now
see, he was actually an Illuminati demon in disguise! He was
gathering information from whistleblowers and having them arrested or
neutralized in one way or another! You’re going to hear the
shocking confessions of this Illuminati agent’s wife, Bruce
Campbell and Stew Webb in the interviews below."
Oddly
enough, Canady does not even call Gunderson by name, though he makes
many accusations, none of which are supported by evidence.
"I’m
not going to name this man in the article because I’ve discovered
that certain names set off the censoring algorithms in social media
and this story must go viral so just listen! I guarantee that you’ve
NEVER heard any of this information before....!"
How presumptuous. The
“information” in the interview (I listened to it) was old news,
which I'm sure many people have heard before. Not only that, but some
of the information was that which I myself had exposed (in my written
reports and on radio) more than a decade ago.
Shocking
confessions! Illuminati demons! All this, from someone who did not
even know Ted Gunderson, and has never been involved in any way with
the issues/events he thinks he is “exposing”. More hype, more
exclamation points (!!!)
But
remember the bottom line: In order to be enlightened by this shocking
truth, YOU, who have been fooled by Ted Gunderson, MUST SEND MONEY to
support these courageous patriots, letting you in on THE TRUTH you
can't possibly get anywhere else!
Glenn
Canady, presumptuous fool that he is, automatically projects his own
ignorance and gullibility on anyone and everyone reading his
messages. How could he possibly know how many people have been
“fooled” by Ted Gunderson? Why does he assume that EVERYONE falls
into the same category?
Stupidity,
plain and simple.
ORION
TALK RADIO SAYS NO TO HATE SPEECH
Orion
Talk Radio extends its remorse over unexpected and regretful
incidents of anti-Semitic hate speech that went out over our station
air waves and wrongly conveyed that all people of Jewish ancestry and
religion are evil or bad. To be fair, commenting about Zionism and
the Israeli government are one thing, but to claim that all Jews are
bad is an extreme far right viewpoint that has no place in the media,
and most especially not on Orion Talk Radio.
We fully support
the right to free speech, but we also understand that free speech
does not sanction or support the right to hate speech, that which
denigrates an entire ethnic culture, or singles out those of a
specific color or religious affiliation. A precious, hallowed right
such as the first amendment was never intended to be used for hate
speech, nor to target specific groups by ethnicity or color.
Let
us be public and perfectly clear on this divisive issue: Orion Talk
Radio does not condone ideology such as this and has already taken
internal steps to remedy the issue, implementing policy within to
ensure that such an incident doesn't happen again, by setting
procedures in place that allow for immediate dismissal upon violation
of said policy.
– NOTICE
on Orion Talk Radio
This
policy was implemented on Orion after a few of the talk show hosts
started spewing hate, mostly against “The Jews”, and promoting
Nazi ideology and the “merits” of Adolf Hitler.
(At
the time I was co-hosting a program, The Medical Conspiracy,
broadcast on Orion by Dr. Antonella Carpenter, so I was acutely aware
of the controversy.)
Two
of the hosts whom many people (including me) considered offensive
were Dr. Rebecca Carley and Maggie Roddin. I have commented
extensively on these individuals in previous reports on this site, so
I won't elaborate here.
But
I will address the notice posted on Maggie Roddin's website, “The
Unsolicited Opinion”.
WARNING!
WARNING!
These
“labels” are used in an attempt to silence people to prevent you
from hearing what they have to say: racist, hater, bigot,
anti-Semite, White supremacist, homophobe, xenophobe,
NaziwhowantstokillsixmillionJews and conspiracy theorist.
Don’t
fall for it. Open your ears and eyes. I offer people the opportunity
to be heard. I don’t censor people, that’s what Marxists do.
TRUTH
DOES NOT FEAR EXAMINATION.
Truth
is not racist.
Facts
are not hate. Facts are facts.
There
is NO such thing as hate speech.
There
is ONLY FREE SPEECH.
Now,
my analysis of Roddin's statements, in what I find to be a very
typical use of slogans in defense of what, in my opinion, is
indefensible, namely racism and bigotry.
I
will start with Roddin's assertion about censorship. I have seen this
claim numerous times by persons of Roddin's ilk. They insist that
they are being “censored” (a case in point being Orion Talk
Radio), if the owners of the station decide that they do not want to
support the type of ideology or viewpoints promoted by the likes of
Maggie Roddin.
The
owners and administrators of any private enterprise (such as a radio
station) have the right to decide what type of content they will, and
will not, broadcast. It is, quite simply, an executive decision.
Most
radio stations (including Orion) have sponsors who advertise their
products or services, which is where the money to run the station
comes from. How many sponsors (unless they are selling swastika
banners, jack boots or swagger sticks) would want to advertise on a
station on which the hosts are Nazi zealots, white supremacists,
spewing hate and bigotry?
For
example, were I the owner of a radio station (or other media outlet),
I would have the right to decide what my enterprise stands for. I
would have the right to promote the ideas, principles, viewpoints
which best serve the purposes of the enterprise. I would have the
right to decide which talk hosts, or writers, would best represent
the entity I have worked to create. For me (and I'm sure for many
others, including Orion) it would be a matter of principle.
Would
I hire someone like Maggie Roddin? Hell, no!
Why
would I be willing to give such a person a platform, when her
ideology goes against everything I believe in, everything I stand
for? Why would I allow my hard-earned money or other resources to be
used for such a purpose? The very idea is not only appalling, but
ludicrous.
And
the same goes for any persons who produce radio/TV shows, or are
editors of a publication. They, and they alone, have the right to
decide what will –and what will not-- be a part of their
enterprise. It is THEIR MONEY and THEIR TIME, to be used as they see
fit.
There
are a plethora of radio networks and publications that DO seek out
such persons (bigots, racists, Nazis, KKK, etc.) and welcome them
with open arms. What is to stop Maggie Roddin from broadcasting her
views on these networks? As far as I can see, only her total lack of
talent and professionalism, which is a separate issue altogether.
Nonetheless,
she is still free to promote her viewpoints on her own website, or
anywhere else, among those who share them, or to get into arguments,
debates or shouting matches with those who do not share her views,
assuming they are willing.
Roddin
claims that using the “labels” such as bigot, racist, white
supremacist, etc. is employed as a tactic to “silence” people.
Certainly
not in the vast majority of cases I have ever seen. When I use these
“labels”, I use them because they are accurate descriptors. When
I see (or hear) someone (like good ol' Jim) saying “race mixing
doesn't work”, I will call that person a racist, because that is
what he so obviously IS.
When
I heard Maggie Roddin, on a radio show, boasting, “I call a spic a
spic!” (her actual quote), I will call her a bigot, because that is
what she so obviously IS. When I hear her praising Adolf Hitler, I
will call her, at the very least, a Nazi sympathizer.
Speaking
for myself, though I am outraged at such bigotry, I have never tried
to “silence” anyone by calling them what they are: racist, bigot,
white supremacist, etc. No, on the contrary, I support their
unalienable RIGHT to free speech, as protected under the
Constitution.
Not
only that, but I find it important to know what they are saying. I
take the time to listen to what they are saying, to analyze their
viewpoints. How else could I possibly attempt to refute them, or take
a public stand against them, if I refuse to listen to them? Were they
silenced, I would have no such opportunity.
To
attempt to “silence” them would not only be counterproductive,
but hypocritical. They have the same right to speak as anyone else,
and I respect that right, regardless of whether or not I respect them
as persons.
Roddin
states: “I don't censor people, that's what Marxists do.”
So,
not only is she accusing those of us who call them as we see them
(racist, bigot, white supremacist, etc. etc.) of “censoring”
her and her ilk, she is suggesting that it is the Marxists who are
responsible for such “censorship”.
I
have news for Maggie Roddin and her cohorts: I have a loathing for
Marxism, just as I have a loathing of Nazi ideology. They are really
two sides of the same coin, or two wings on the same bird of prey.
Both attempt to control others, to oppress others, to infringe on the
unalienable rights of others. Neither of them have any respect for
the Inviolability of Personhood, which means the EQUAL rights of all
and sundry as INDIVIDUALS.
My
objective is not to silence them, but to EXPOSE them and their evil,
to rip away the cloak of false “righteousness” under which they
operate.
Roddin
parrots one of the stupidest slogans I have ever heard, used
frequently by those whose agenda is to propagandize for bigotry and
hate:
"TRUTH
DOES NOT FEAR EXAMINATION."
Such
a statement defies logic. “Truth” is a concept, a description of
objective reality, not a sentient being, not a person. How can a
concept be capable of “fear”, which can only be described as a
feeling, an emotion, or a perception?
It
might be logical to say that a person who is telling the truth does
not fear examination of that truth, with the qualifier of “in
certain cases, not all cases.”
That
would depend on who is doing the examining. What about the
Inquistion? What about CIA's so-called “enhanced interrogation”
(torture)? What about the Crusades of the Catholic Church? What about
the person falsely accused of a crime he did not commit, wrongfully
prosecuted and/or convicted in a court of law? What about the
genuine whistleblowers right here in America, who are persecuted by
the government for telling the truth, from direct personal knowledge,
about crimes and corruption?
I
can't count the times when I had every reason to be fearful that I
would be assaulted (in one way or another), tortured, or even killed,
simply for telling the truth. I'm certain that many others would
stand in agreement with me.
Will
that stop me (or certain others) from telling the truth? No, but it
does not mean that we pretend there is no fear of “examination”
of that truth. Just look at WHO is doing the examination, and the
answer is clear for any reasonable person to see.
For
Roddin to say that “there is no such thing as hate speech” is
beyond preposterous.
Free
speech means exactly that. Free speech, a constitutionally protected
right, would certainly include any form of expression, including that
based on “hate”. (As well as speech based on ignorance,
delusions, arrogance, insanity, foolishness or stupidity.)
However,
there are unlawful forms of “speech”, such as, shouting FIRE! in
a crowded theater. Such as making threats to do bodily harm, or kill
someone. Inciting violence and terrorism is another unlawful form of
“speech”. Which sometimes includes certain forms of “hate
speech”.
I
vehemently disagree with any government criminalizing “hate
speech”. That is tyranny, no doubt about it. It is a grievous
violation of one of the most fundamental unalienable rights.
Who
is to decide what constitutes “hate speech”? Who would have the
discretionary power, and under what authority?
The
fact of the matter is that “hate speech” does indeed exist. Most
of the time it falls into the category of lawful “free speech”.
But does that mean that those of us who find racism, bigotry, any
form of supremacism (by ethnicity, race, gender, religion) appalling
should just sit back and allow it to go unchallenged?
In
most cases it is not a matter of “law”, but rather of a moral
imperative. Those who truly advocate Liberty, equal unalienable
rights for all, AS INDIVIDUALS, must also exercise our right to free
speech, with the purpose of exposing and denouncing the attitudes
which lead to the perpetuation of hate, racism and bigotry. If we
don't do it, who will?
If
we fail to confront the evils of hate and bigotry, then we are to be
held accountable for allowing them to flourish unchallenged.
SUPPORT
FOR BIGOTS, RACISTS, WHITE SUPREMACISTS
Who
is responsible for allowing hate, bigotry and unjust discrimination
to grow and flourish? Not only those who publicly promote such
ideology and attitudes, but each and every individual who supports
them, who enables them, or who fails to stand up against them.
Here,
some examples. Let's start with the aforementioned American Free
Press. I have known a number of people who paid for subscriptions to
this newspaper, and even purchased additional subscriptions for
others.
Even
when I explained, in great detail, who runs the publication
(including the late Ted Gunderson, Willis Carto et al), what they
stand for, and furnished evidence to support my statements, they
chose not to listen, and said things like, Well, they have SOME good
information.
They
seemed not to understand that by sending money to this publication,
for a subscription, they were aiding and abetting the very ideology,
attitudes and propaganda which any freedom-loving person would be
standing up against. What is the value of “some good information”
(assuming it is even factual) when weighed against the vile
propaganda which serves to indoctrinate the readers with falsehoods?
The
money paid for subscriptions also funds the conferences, such as the
Holocaust denier/historical revisionist event, in 2006, where Ted
Gunderson (and Nazis) made an appearance. Yes, they have the right
to hold such gatherings. But do you want to be involved, by providing
the money to make it happen?
Then,
there are the radio talk hosts who regularly and consistently promote
racist ideology, and who blame “The Jews” for every evil on the
face of the earth. Some (like American Free Press) boldly promote a
show of support for Adolf Hitler.
The
person who comes immediately to mind is Jeff Rense (Rense dot com).
Rense, one of the most well-known talk hosts, considered a
“celebrity” by many people in the so-called “patriot”
circles, was first known for his programs on UFOs and other related
subjects.
I
have known quite a few people (mostly researchers and journalists),
over a time period of almost three decades, who have appeared as
guests on Rense's show. Some were legitimate, others were not.
Among
those individuals, most of those whom I once considered friends, are
former friends. Not because they appeared on Rense's show, but
because they were willing to go along with the propaganda in order to
get the publicity, which was clearly more important than integrity,
honor or truth. Speaking for myself, I take friendship seriously, and
won't have “friends” who are trafficking with the enemy,
especially out of a lack of integrity.
Rense
has consistently advocated and promoted Ted Gunderson, and has never,
to my knowledge, spoken a word publicly against him. Even when Rense
was confronted with the truth about Ted Gunderson, along with
evidence, he refused to acknowledge it.
Dr.
Leonard Horowitz, who had been a personal friend of Jeff Rense (and
appeared as a guest on his program), for more than a decade, had been
told by Rense that he could not address these issues, out of some
sort of “fear” of the consequences.
Dr.
Horowitz (who had also considered Ted Gunderson a “friend”, until
he learned the truth that he himself had been targeted by
COINTELPRO), expressed his outrage about Rense's obvious reasons for
sticking with the Gunderson party line. Rense chose to end his
longtime association with Horowitz, rather than “make waves”
which might threaten his ensconced position, his obviously vested
interests, which certainly were not in service to any kind of truth.
Rense
regularly promotes guests who denounce “the Jews”, some of whom
also share Rense's admiration of Adolf Hitler.
Ask
yourself, what kind of person would be celebrating the birthday of
Adolf Hilter? Rense does, openly and brazenly, including with a
picture of a cake in Hitler's honor. He also promotes the artwork of
Adolf Hitler, collections of paintings on his website. Why?
I
find it difficult to listen to Rense, and don't do so often, for the
same basic reasons I don't like to listen to Maggie Roddin, Jim How,
or others who claim that people like me are “demonizing Nazis”.
Frankly,
they make me sick.
But
Rense, unlike Jim How or Maggie Roddin, is not stupid, crude or
unprofessional. He is a very polished and eloquent speaker. Which
makes him all the more dangerous as he promotes anti-Jewish
propaganda. I've often heard him calling Jews, “the tribe”, with
a derogatory sneer in his inflection. He also tries to correct his
guests, if they mention “Nazis”, by saying, “Let's call them
Germans.”
Strange,
why not call them what they actually are: Nazis. If you want to speak
on behalf of the political ideology, why not call it what it actually
is?
Rense
dot com offers a regular radio program hosted by David Duke, the
former Ku Klux Klan Grand Dragon. Duke, too, is educated and
polished, and has a talent for drawing in his audience with his
smooth-talking rhetoric. Duke is a politician with an agenda, not a
defender of Liberty or unalienable rights.
Duke,
who identifies himself as a Christian, is a white separatist (who
insists he is not a “white supremacist”), who claims he supports
the rights of all people. But clearly, he is a racist, who is trying,
via his propaganda, to stop certain people from exercising the right
to freedom of association, especially marriage (and breeding), with
certain other people.
Why
is it that so many people can't seem to perceive the obvious truth,
that Rense, Duke and their colleagues, like Texe Marrs (another
regular guest on Rense's show), who runs a “Christian” ministry,
are weaving a web of deception with their propaganda, and drawing in
more and more people, in support for their agenda?
(I
remember, back in the days when I first started publishing my reports
on the Internet, I would receive, by post, copies of the Texe Marrs
newsletter, connected to his “ministry”. I had never asked for
these newsletters and had no interest in them. Yet they continued to
arrive, month after month. Why was my name added to this mailing
list?
After
seeing what the agenda was –lurid propaganda against “The Jews”,
I started using the publication as kindling in my fireplace –just
as I would use the copies of American Free Press which were sent to
me, unsolicited, even after I had made it crystal clear that I did
not want them.)
Again,
as with American Free Press, I've known people who have paid to
subscribe to Rense's radio archives, which are not free.
When
I've asked them why they would provide material support for Rense,
they have replied, saying things like, Oh, well, So-and-So is a
regular guest on Rense and I want to hear her. Or, It's only a few
dollars a month....
Have
they considered what, exactly, it is that they are paying to support?
They are providing sustenance for the dissemination of bigotry,
racism, and hatred of “The Jews”.
The
same holds true for those who support other talk show hosts, such as
Deanna Spingola, another rabid Jew-hater and adoring fan of Adolf
Hitler.
I've
known people who have appointed themselves as unwanted “matchmakers”,
contacting some of these hosts, with the idea that Barbara Hartwell
might be a guest on their programs.
I
have no interest in having dealings with these people, nor engaging
them in discussions, arguments or debates. If I have something to say
about them, I write a report, or say it on a radio program.
And if I
had any interest in contacting them (I don't) I would have done so
myself.
Even
when I have tried to explain my position, or point out that someone
like Spingola, for example, is a Nazi pimp, they will say something
like, Well, I think she's of German extraction....
So
what? That means she would, simply by virtue of her bloodline, want
to be an advocate of Nazis? What the hell?
What
disturbs me most of all is that many people are being bamboozled,
hoodwinked, deceived, led astray by these propagandists, these wolves
in sheep's clothing, these racists and bigots, simply because they
have failed to exercise their capacity for critical thinking, and
seem to be ruled by their emotions, reacting to the sensationalist,
fear-mongering rhetoric, rather than employing reason or the most
basic discernment.
I
don't expect them to agree with me, or to change their position based
on what I say. I can only offer them truthful information, and
explain that my position is based on principle. I can hope that they
will see the truth, but I won't try to force it on them.
If
they wish to continue supporting people who promote bigotry and
racism, using the money they have provided, or via disseminating
their propaganda, that is their choice.
However,
so many of them seem to feel compelled to put pressure on me, trying
to get me to compromise my principles to accommodate the ideology of
the propagandists, even after I have clearly stated that for me, the
issue is non-negotiable. My position is not based on emotion,
ignorance, or lack of information, but on many years of research,
investigations, and direct personal knowledge. But most importantly,
on the principles I uphold. And so, sadly, one friendship after
another has come to an end.
STOP
HATING, STOP JUDGING, STOP DISCRIMINATING
In
June of this year, Dave Champion hosted what he said was the “final”
Dave Champion TV show. I first heard Dave's radio program in 2010,
which later became a TV show.
I
immediately became a “fan” (a term I don't usually like or use,
except in rare cases), and have listened to the show ever since.
Dave
Champion is also the author of INCOME TAX Shattering the Myths, the
best book by far I have ever read on the subject.
But
the most important attribute about Dave Champion that made me a fan
is his no-nonsense, uncompromising stand for Liberty.
Many
people talk long and loud about Liberty, especially citing all the
infringements of rights committed by the government. But all too many
of them refuse to respect the very same unalienable rights of others
that they so vociferously demand for themselves.
Rather
than seeing the fundamental truth that unalienable rights are for all
and sundry, for each individual, they compartmentalize rights into
categories: black rights, white rights, women's rights, men's rights,
gay rights, elder's rights, rights of the disabled, religious rights,
secular rights...(fill in the blank...)
In
the “final” TV program, Dave gives a presentation of which the
theme is this: Stop hating. Stop judging. Stop discriminating. It is
a message about the injustice of bigotry, that such attitudes are
antithetical to Liberty.
I
won't try to paraphrase his message further, because that's not my
place. Instead I would ask my readers to watch the program. (Link
provided below.) For those of my regular readers who do find value in
the reports published here, I believe that you will greatly
appreciate the work of Dave Champion.
I
will say that I am in wholehearted agreement with Dave's message,
that I believe it is based on many years of hard won knowledge via
his research/investigations, personal/professional experience,
critical thinking, reason and principle. It is a message filled with
honor and integrity, as well as the most profound spirit of Liberty.
It
is the same basic message that I have sought to deliver for many
years, and although each person who has an understanding of the
principles of Liberty may have his/her own way of expressing it, and
although we may not agree on every single issue, it encompasses the
same basic truth.
Unalienable
rights for one and all. The same rights, regardless of race, gender,
ethnicity, religion (or lack thereof). Equal rights for all, special
rights for none.
http://www.davechampionshow.com/archives/?m=201506
IN
SUMMARY
This
report began with an examination of the counterintelligence
operations run by FBI Chief Ted Gunderson and continued with
testimony from former FBI agent/whistleblower Geral Sosbee, whose
career was sabotaged by J. Edgar Hoover, Ted Gunderson and their
cronies, and who has endured relentless persecution ever since, all
for standing up for Liberty, for honoring his oath to defend the
Constitution, for defending the unalienable rights of all, as
protected under the Constitution.
Geral
Sosbee's detailed and extensive documentation of government
persecution, and the neutralization campaign against him, is by far
the most comprehensive and credible I have ever seen. And because I
have been priviliged to be his friend for nearly a decade and a half,
I have also been privy to much of the unpublished documentation in
our personal conversations. I know his testimony to be truthful. I
myself have become a witness to many of the atrocities, the torture,
the relentless assaults.
I
have direct personal knowledge, as does Geral Sosbee, of every issue
addressed in this report. This report has not been based on
speculation, or theories, but rather on real events, real persons,
identified and quoted, using their own words.
As
for Ted Gunderson, though he has been a focal point of this report,
what I find most important are the issues themselves, and how the
beliefs and attitudes of the citizens of this country have been
influenced by propaganda generated by the government, most
specifically the FBI, CIA, IRS, NSA and other agencies, which rather
than serve the interests of We the People (protecting our unalienable
rights, defending our Liberty, pursuing justice), have rather served
an agenda of control, manipulation and ultimately, tyranny.
The
government, rather than being the servant of the people, as a
sovereign Constitutional Republic, with the “consent of the
governed”, has become a behemoth, an institution in which
individual liberties and unalienable rights are cast aside, in favor
of a collectivist global totalitarian state.
The
endless wars declared by the government, the “war on poverty”,
the “war on drugs”, the “war on terrorism”, are in reality
one (undeclared) war: The war on We the People.
The
government in fact drives the people into poverty, pushes drugs on
the population (drugs for arms operations), and makes enemies around
the world via their wars of aggression, conquest and nation building.
Then,
they call other nations “terrorists”, when in fact they may be
only defending themselves against invasion and corporate imperialism
fomented by the U.S. Government and its accomplices in the United
Nations. The U.N., which masquerades as promoting peace, justice and
universal human rights, all the while working for a One World
Totalitarian government, which accords no respect whatsoever for the
unalienable rights of the Individual, which are subsumed by the
purported “rights” of the collective.
Here
is the problem. It is those who refuse to respect the Inviolability
of Personhood, the unalienable rights of the Individual, but instead
throw their support, their resources, their hearts and minds, into
agenda politics of one variety or another, especially an agenda which
serves only a designated group of persons, or excludes any designated
group of persons, by race, by ethnicity, by gender, by religion (or
lack thereof).
We
who are true and uncompromising advocates of Liberty, shown by our
actions, rather than by cheap and easy rhetoric and empty slogans,
have a duty to hold them accountable (individually and collectively)
for the injustices, the abuses of authority, the grievous wrongs
which would threaten the unalienable rights of one and all.
Do
you love Liberty? Then defend it for everyone. Every single person,
one by one. Stop the aggression. Stop the hate. Stop the bigotry.
Stop demanding rights for yourself, while denying those same equal
rights for others.
Barbara Hartwell Percival
October 7, 2015
Barbara Hartwell Percival
Legal Defense &
Research Trust
PO Box 22
Rhinebeck, NY 12572
Barbara Hartwell Vs.
CIA
