Katherine
Horton runs a website called STOP 007.
I
first learned of the existence of Katherine Horton and her website
when I was invited by Ramola D/Dharmaraj as a guest on her podcast,
Ramola D Reports, to do a series of interviews. Horton was a member
of the Techno Crime Fighters Forum, a weekly podcast which presented
information on various issues related to the targeting of individuals
via directed energy weaponry and other means.
In
August of this year (2018) the forum ended, a result of the decision
of the other members, including Ramola. I am not personally
acquainted with any of the former members, including Horton, with the
exception of Ramola. I will not include their names here, out of
respect for their privacy. I speak strictly for myself and my purpose
is to address Katherine Horton's defamation against me, in connection
with her defamation against Ramola.
I
should make it clear that I am not, nor have ever been involved, in
any organizations or groups which address issues or conduct activism
for what they call “targeted individuals”, nor am I in any way
connected to what is called the “TI community”.
I
am an independent investigator, intelligence analyst, journalist and
government whistleblower. I do not join groups. As clearly stated in
notices on this website, my reports are for INFORMATION PURPOSES
ONLY. The readers may make of the material on this website what they
will.
As
brief background, I have been a political Target of retaliatory
counterintelligence operations for a quarter century and have
published reports on the Internet exposing numerous perpetrators by
name, since 1995, as well as on radio and video podcasts.
This
report specifically addresses the defamation of Barbara Hartwell by
one Katherine Horton, on her website and on video podcasts, which has
recently come to my attention. My purpose is to refute the false
accusations with facts, of which Horton is clearly in short supply.
I
had viewed a number of the podcasts of TCFF and made my own
independent observations and analysis, on which I published a report
on August 16, 2018.
EXCERPT
I
did watch a number of the podcasts of Techno Crime Fighters' Forum.
And I did observe the behavior of Katherine Horton, on more than one
occasion, as openly advocating violence against specifically named
persons, such as Gina Haspel. A “bullet in the brain” was one
such statement. The dropping of F-bombs accompanied these rantings.
End
excerpt
Shortly
thereafter, I published another report naming Horton, after some
defamatory comments against me by one of many anonymous cowards and
morons, a supporter of Horton, appeared on a You Tube podcast on
Ramola's channel.
THE MOB: A Morality Tale
EXCERPT
Fact:
I do not know Katherine Horton. Anything I have said, in writing, or
on video with Ramola, was based on my independent observations and
analysis of a very PUBLIC issue, that being the words and actions of
Horton, in calling for unlawful violence, even murder, of public
figures, while ranting, dropping F-bombs.
My
analysis of this behavior included what I deemed a sort of
“theatrical production”. A woman hunkering down in what she
described as a “bunker”, crawling under a desk, surrounded by tin
foil walls, while advocating “bullets in brains”.
No,
I see no “dignity”, nor “integrity” in this behavior. What I
do see is that those associated with Horton will be tarred with the
same brush of lawlessness, thus not in any way helping their cause,
or serving the cause of justice.
End
excerpt
Next
item: Katherine Horton defames Barbara Hartwell by listing my name in
a section of her website, titled:
BLOOD
ON THEIR HANDS (BLACK LIST)
The
criminals and people who chose to do nothing when victims begged for
their help.
Horton
names Barbara Hartwell in her defamatory article which makes many
false accusations against Ramola D:
"Barbara
Hartwell, CIA, wades in"
(link
to my report on TCFF, given above)
Note
the sinister and incendiary title: “BLOOD ON THEIR HANDS”
So,
Horton accuses Barbara Hartwell of being CIA, apparently parroting
the longstanding party-line of controlled opposition. Nothing new
here. And lists me and Ramola as two of the “criminals and people
who chose to do nothing when victims begged for their help.”
This
is one of the most stupid statements I have seen, especially
regarding Ramola, who has done more to help many people suffering
from persecution than most anyone I have ever known, not only as a
journalist reporting on their cases, but with material support as
well. As for me, Horton has access to no information whatsoever about
anything I have done – or not done. It is simply a malicious,
sensationalist fabrication, in an attempt to discredit me.
Then,
the most recent slander in a video podcast, titled:
Dos & Don'ts - Holocaust Working Group 2 (Stop 007)
I
did not watch the entire video, which was over 4 hours long. I don't
have that kind of time to waste, listening to the malicious nonsense
and filth spewed by this woman. I was told of the video by Ramola,
who gave me the time markers of Horton's defamatory comments. I took
notes and will address Horton's defamation, which I will show to be
FACT-FREE, nothing but name-calling, erroneous assumptions, wild
speculation, fabrication. As usual, she drops the F-bombs liberally.
Horton's comments are in quotes.
Horton
begins with this statement:
"The
CIA's Barbara Hartwell wades in. She is a bitch. I've never met the
bitch. This woman is off her rocker. Personally I think she is a
f—ing fraud, I think she is a CIA plant."
How
very original...nothing that has not been promoted in a massive
defamation campaign for two decades by my enemies in the intelligence
community and their minions, lackeys and stooges. And for which none
of them has been able to produce any evidence, ever.
Addressing
BH:
"I
laughed my ass off. You are against the crown corporation, my dear.
Why the f--- do you have a snake, logo of the Vatican/CIA. Why the
f--- do you show yourself with gangstalking sunglasses, which
indicate you don't want people to see your face that well?"
FACT:
I have never named any “crown corporation” in my written reports,
nor in any other venue. As will become clear, Horton is putting words
in my mouth, and making false statements about things I never said.
FACT:
The flag displayed on my website is the Gadsden flag:
The
Gadsden flag is a historical American flag with a yellow field
depicting a rattlesnake coiled and ready to strike. Positioned below
the rattlesnake are the words "DONT TREAD ON ME." The flag
is named after American general and politician Christopher Gadsden,
who designed it in 1775 during the American Revolution.
As
used by me, it has absolutely nothing to do with the Vatican or CIA.
Horton is clearly ignorant of the true symbolism and of American
history.
As
for the so-called “gangstalking sunglasses”, just another stupid,
erroneous assumption. I wear sunglasses year round, due to extreme
light-sensitivity of my eyes. If I wanted to hide my face, I would
have no photo at all.
And
don't call me “my dear”, you foul-mouthed creature, you loathsome
servant of the devil.
Again,
she brings up the snake, and the Vatican with another false
statement:
"You
claim you're suing the crown corporation?"
FACT:
No, I have never made any such “claim”, about suing the “crown
corporation”. Again, she is putting words in my mouth, which I
never spoke, and citing claims I never made.
"Are
you off your rocker? And then you are wading in ten days after this
woman makes an announcement that she's trying to look in to the
financial, a leading financial expert on the space-based economy and
black budget. F--- don't tread on me. She deserves the Nobel prize."
FACT:
I do not know the person she mentions (Catherine Austin-Fitts). There
is no connection between anything I have ever said about Horton (or
on any other topic) and this third party. Horton is commingling
issues which are in no way related and which have nothing to do with
me.
"Ten
days later this woman who claims to be suing the crown corporation
who has never met me adds shit to the situation. Really? Is that the
most f—ing productive thing you can do if you're claiming to be
against the CIA? Two days later Ramola publishes Hartwell's musings
about free speech and if you should swear and advocate violence.
Knowing that the whole f---ing thing wasn't about advocating violence
to start with."
FACT:
Once again, the false statement about a “claim”. Never have I
made such a claim of any such lawsuit. Which again, has nothing to do
with anything published by Ramola. And no, I do not advocate
promoting lawless violence and murder against anyone, as does
Katherine Horton. In my considered professional opinion she is a
liability to anyone associated with her. An opinion I am free to
state. I do not presume to tell anyone what they “should” be
doing, nor have I ever tried to police anyone's free speech. And I
“know” no such thing. From my observations, promoting violence
was a major issue, as clearly stated by Ramola and others.
"Before
Barbara Hartwell pulled this thing, I already had issues with her.
Issues are, go to my website. All of you need to learn discernment.
Do you believe Barbara Hartwell? Do you believe me? I don't care as
long as you start thinking about it."
What
nonsense. Now, Horton presumptuously takes on the persona of a school
teacher, an instructor of all others. Considering the fact that I am
not involved in her “community” of followers, it is not my
concern whether or not any of them believe anything I say, nor have I
ever sought their opinions.
Next,
typically, Horton brings up former FBI chief Ted Gunderson, a known
former colleague, and later, adversary of Barbara Hartwell. And, as I
will make very clear by stating the actual FACTS, Horton knows
nothing about Gunderson, just as she knows nothing about Barbara
Hartwell.
She
cites the “high profile affidavit” of Ted Gunderson, published on
her website and a number of others.
"Ted
Gunderson, who was murdered in 2011. In fact he was murdered in such
a way, his personal physician said he saw Gunderson being murdered
over a period of 8 years, where he was poisoned with arsenic."
Now,
Horton parrots the “murder” plot, which has been all over the
Internet since 2011. I have not seen any evidence from any
trustworthy source, such that I would believe that Gunderson was
murdered. He was nearly 83 years old at the time of his death, and
was being treated for cancer. But I have certainly seen all kinds of
conspiracy theories promoted by some very UNtrustworthy sources, the
same minions and stooges of Gunderson who have carried out his dirty
work of stalking, threatening, libeling/slandering Targets of
Gunderson's COINTELPRO. Including Barbara Hartwell. What a
coincidence.
And
then, Horton makes this statement:
"The
man who was in line to become director of the FBI was poisoned by the
FBI."
Horton
does not know what the hell she is talking about. But for those
interested, here are some FACTS.
Ted
Gunderson retired from the FBI in 1979. Before his retirement, he was
considered as a possible candidate for Director, but the position
went to William Webster. Gunderson retired from the FBI nearly FORTY
YEARS AGO. At the time of the supposed “poisoning”, even if it
began in 2003, 8 years before 2011, when he died, he was certainly
NOT “in line” to be Director of the FBI. This is a FACT anyone
can easily check from the public record and Gunderson's FBI file.
Then,
she further states:
"Ted
Gunderson blew the whistle on pedophiles, pedophilia, satanic
pedophile rings, satanic ritual sacrifice, the mass theft of children
by none other than the FBI. Special Agent in Charge, in line to be
the next director of the FBI. Then the FBI poisoned him. Why would
someone who is in line to be Director of the FBI shoot his entire
career prospects? He knows how COINTELPRO works. FBI cointel
annihilates entire social circles."
FACT:
By the time Gunderson began publicly discussing any of these issues,
he was already OUT of the FBI. Again, he was NOT “in line” to be
Director. As far as COINTELPRO, Gunderson was Hoover's right hand
man, the COINTELPRO Kingpin. Of course he knows how it works. He
continued as a perpetrator of counterintelligence operations for
decades after he retired. Gunderson was no whistleblower. He in fact
ran containment operations to neutralize genuine whistleblowers, former military and intelligence professionals.
Horton
rambles on, showing her profound ignorance.
Again,
she continues to repeat the falsehood that Gunderson was “in line”
to be director of the FBI.
"Why
would somebody who is in line to be head of the FBI do all this to
get himself killed, if he weren't genuinely shocked? If Gunderson was
just a crook, like Hartwell likes to say, you could be a crook for
free. If he hadn't done that he would have been the next director of
the FBI."
FACT:
I first met Ted Gunderson in 1997, when he was planted on me. I got
to know him very well. I worked with him for three years before I
broke off my association with him, for cause. I have done my own
thorough investigations of Gunderson's criminal activities, which I
have exposed, on this website and in other venues, since 2000.
Katherine
Horton is a pretentious poseur, who makes claims which cannot be
verified, just shooting off her mouth about issues of which she knows
nothing, which only exposes her ignorance. She did not know
Gunderson, nor has she presented any facts. She has only parroted the
Gunderson COINTELPRO party-line promoted by his minions and stooges.
It's
all been said hundreds of times, by hundreds of belligerent
ignoramuses, of which she is only one of the latest.
"How
exactly does the evidence stack up with what Barbara Hartwell is
saying, because in my reading it doesn't stack up. Not the f--- at
all. Harebrained shit that I don't know what. This is just the
facts."
Facts?
What facts are those? Horton does a great job of managing to be
FACT-FREE, while claiming to know things for which she can provide no
evidence.
Then
she comes out with this, about how she knows the “facts”:
"Female
intution otherwise known as deductive reasoning...inductive
reasoning...whatever."
FACT:
“Female intuition” is a vague concept which is not based on logic
and which cannot be proven, and has nothing to do with deductive
reasoning.
Deductive
reasoning is a logical process in which a conclusion is based on the
concordance of multiple premises that are generally assumed to be
true.
And
more than that I won't bother to say, except that maybe Horton could
benefit from taking a course in logic, which it appears plays no role
in her thinking processes.
"What
that tells me about Barbara Hartwell when I hear her voice and just
close my eyes it just sounds like f---ing lies to me personally. My
personal assessment of this is I don't believe her f—ing fake
cough. I don't believe a single word this woman says."
Well,
bully for you, Katherine Horton. Your "female intuition" must be in overdrive. What kind of person would ridicule someone's medical condition calling it a "fake"? Your little gaggle of followers,
I'm sure, will hang on every word you say, despite the fact that you
can furnish not a scintilla of evidence, for the simple reason that
none exists.
Horton
then adds this:
"I
never mentioned Barbara Hartwell once. I respect her right to put her
view out there. I applaud Ramola for bringing it to the fore, this
way I could decide if Barbara Hartwell is a fraud. It reassured me to
put Ted Gunderson's work out there. I'm all for collection of data,
I'm in favor of having Barbara Hartwell on so we can all decide."
Apparently,
Horton, in her arrogance, believes that Barbara Hartwell is on trial
and will be convicted in the court of public opinion, as she
expresses her fraudulent and insincere sentiments regarding Ramola.
"Her
facts are bullshit. The fact she's talking sounds like one hundred
percent lying and fakeness."
So,
she talks about “facts”, while presenting not one verifiable fact
in her tirade of invective against Barbara Hartwell.
"Just
happens to have cartel signalling that meets you when you go to her
website. Somebody who fights the CIA having been in CIA, knowing
their internal coded language, you would not put the image of a snake
with the tagline Don't tread on Me. So nothing makes any f—ing
sense."
Cartel
signalling! Coded language! And snakes! And she actually thinks she knows what
someone would put on a website, and why. No, I'm sure it makes no
f--ing sense to Katherine Horton. With every word she speaks she
reveals her profound ignorance, along with her malice.
"This
is evidence that people should take whatever she says with a pinch of
salt or pepper."
What
evidence? Katherine Horton has provided no evidence whatsoever, only
easily refutable defamatory falsehoods.
In
summary, I can only say that from my observations, Katherine Horton
is running a theatrical production for the purpose of propagandizing
those persons foolish enough to follow along on the road to the death
and destruction she advocates. And she solicits money for her "cause", as advertised, putting "bullets in brains".
If
she is in fact some sort of operative (as some have suggested), those
who have hired her have made a poor choice indeed, and must be
desperate for cheap labor. She behaves like a rank amateur, even in her
theatrics, and especially in showing her ignorance of real
counterintelligence operations and those who run them.
Katherine
Horton: FACT-FREE and evidently proud of it. By her fruits shall you
know her.
Barbara
Hartwell
November
23, 2018
PS: DON'T TREAD ON ME
ADDENDUM
From
The Every Day Concerned Citizen
Joint Public Cease and Desist Notice to Dr. Katherine Horton
Date: 11/21/2018
In light of Dr. Katherine Horton‘s recent inflammatory, defamatory, and libelous online publication