DISCLAIMER RE RAMOLA DHARMARAJ
This disclaimer is being added to every report which addresses my former association with Ramola Dharmaraj. Rather than delete the reports, I have left most of them up, as evidence, and as an opportunity to expose the truth.
FOR THE RECORD:
I had an association with Ramola Dharmaraj (aka Ramola D) from 2018 to 2021. I had been invited as a regular guest on her podcast, and she promoted my work on her website, The Every Day Concerned Citizen.
I broke off the association in mid-2021, for cause. She showed herself to be an extremely aggressive busybody, who meddled in my business, appointed herself as an unwanted intermediary (with both total strangers and my friends – now former friends due to her gossip and meddling), and I realized that she was exploiting my name in efforts to make a name for herself.
I quietly walked away, after I saw that she had no respect whatsoever for my privacy and personal boundaries, and after she disregarded my polite requests that she mind her own business and stop interfering in mine.
She then started pursuing me, and when I ignored her attempts to contact me, she began to send defamatory messages to my (then) friends, behind my back, in attempts to recruit them as allies against me.
Finally, she began publicly slandering me on her website and on social media, even after I issued a public warning that there would be consequences for her unscrupulous, dishonorable actions.
Ramola D has proved herself to be a habitual liar, a hypocrite, a self-serving grandstander, boasting with her self-aggrandizing, preposterous claims, and fabricating libelous falsehoods, accusing me of being paid by CIA, and of “slandering” her. Nothing could be further from the truth!
My concern is only that she continues, in her malicious attempts to discredit me, and to destroy my good name, with idiotic, wild accusations with no basis in fact.
***************
ERIKA MEYER
Erika
Meyer Produces Video of Babbling Idiocy & Wild Speculation
On
October 29, 2019 a woman named Erika Meyer produced two videos:
"Disinformation
theatre: Katherine Horton, Ramola D, Frederic Larouche, Melanie
Vritschan (part 1)"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnNvnsGBifQ
"Disinformation theatre: Katherine Horton, Ramola D, Frederic Larouche, Melanie Vritschan (part 2)"
"Looking more closely into the disinformation theatre, and into the background of Ramola Dharmaraj."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChSiLvQCs3w
*******
Erika
Meyer: Just one among the idiot parade of Internet trolls
–aggressive, ill-informed, moronic characters who apparently have
nothing better to do with their time than engage in wild speculation,
while promoting baseless, slanderous gossip about others.
The
name of Barbara Hartwell was included in the speculative, defamatory
ramblings of this woman. These characters are a dime a dozen, and
ooze out of the woodwork to target legitimate people, usually
journalists, activists, patriots, genuine government whistleblowers.
I've
seen it time and time again. Their Targets (including me), after
trying to ignore them (in the hope they may spontaneously
self-destruct, or just go away), when exposing these idiots, will
often make a comment, such as: I never heard of this whackjob. Yet
he/she is grossly exploiting my name; making false accusations;
fabricating weird/absurd stories about me; pretending that they
“know” things, and/or falsely claiming there is some personal
“connection” or “link” where absolutely none exists.
From
my observations (and unfortunate experience) of being targeted by
hordes of these creepy characters, they are ignorant, unprincipled
persons seeking public attention – the more, the better, any way
they can get it.
Since
these wannabes have no credentials, no professional background of any
kind, which could possibly qualify them to present any information of
value (educational or otherwise), they resort to malicious aggression
against others whom they envy (not in a good way), dropping names and
crashing gates, foolishly thinking they can force their way into the
legitimate business of others, and thus gain public acclaim they have
not earned and do not deserve – except, of course, to be exposed as
pretentious, babbling fools.
In
a word, they are troublemakers. And I, for one, firmly believe they
should be exposed, to set the public record straight, to refute their
outrageous falsehoods, and as a warning to others to steer clear of
them.
On
what, exactly, did Erika Meyer base her idiotic babbling?
On
a lone exhibit: a lurid “attack” chart produced by a notorious
charlatan, Katherine Horton, the Tin Foil Princess of Eastern Europe;
from a website called STOP 007, on which Horton has maliciously and
profusely defamed Ramola D, Barbara Hartwell, Melanie Vritschan,
Thomas McFarlan, with lurid and incendiary false accusations.
I
must say it was a form of torture to listen to the ignorant ramblings
of this woman, Meyer. Her whiny, nasal voice grates on the nerves,
through 20 minutes of wild speculation, as she makes false
connections and “links” where none exist; and as she expresses
her delusions that SHE, Erika Meyer, is at the center of some grand
conspiracy, spawned by those she claims are running a “disinformation
theatre”.
As
tiresome as it is, I took some notes, and will use this material to
make an example of a typical participant in the Idiot Hit Parade,
making videos which display nothing but their unmitigated stupidity.
Here
are some statements (not exact quotes) from Erika Meyer, followed by
my comments. Anyone who is interested in more idiotic details may
listen to the video.
WARNING:
PREPARE TO BE BORED TO TEARS.
EM:
"I spent yesterday looking for more information on Ramola. I believe
all the people on this page are disinfo people."
So,
she is apparently doing “opposition research”, otherwise known as
digging for dirt on a person she dislikes, in the hope of finding
something she can use against her. As you read on, note that in her
search for information on Ramola, she found no damning info, no
titillating scandals, no criminal record, nothing at all –but
typically for her ilk, that didn't stop her from breaking out the
pole vault, flying through the ether and landing on her sorry butt,
amid a trash heap of false conclusions.
EM:
"I mean, you know....most people who are called whistleblowers here
are not, um...you know, I can see a pattern and sniff these people
out pretty quickly. Most people who call themselves TIs are hiding
something."
On
the chart to which she refers, I see not one person referred to as a
“whistleblower”. And who does she think decides, who is, or who
is not, a whistleblower? Is Erika Meyer the judge of that? Or,
Katherine Horton, the architect of the chart? Neither of whom would
qualify as whistleblowers, under even the most lax of standards.
Aside
from knowing and stating the definitive qualifications of a
whistleblower (based on facts and evidence), it would only be a
matter of subjective perception and speculation, a “skill set”
with which Erika Myer appears to have developed considerable
expertise.
As
for people who call themselves “TIs” hiding something? Speaking
strictly for myself, as always, I do NOT call myself a TI, and have
no commonalities with those who do, nor am involved with any of their
groups. So, had she the slightest discernment, she would count me
out.
What's
more, anything I choose to “hide” from the prying eyes of the
general public is my prerogative, my right. It's called PRIVACY, ever
heard of it? No, indeed. For a snoop, gate-crasher and gossip like
Erika Meyer, personal boundaries don't even exist.
NOTE:
If you're looking for a bloodhound to “sniff out” a Target, don't
call Erika Meyer.
Next,
more speculation on Ramola:
EM:
"Ramola is of Indian descent... based on speech patterns I believe
she was born in India. A lot of the mind control doctors are linked
to India. All mind control is linked to frequency based stuff."
Ramola
was born in India. That is a fact on the public record, which anyone
can easily find, and which Ramola herself has stated publicly. So
what? But her “speech patterns” do not necessarily reflect any
particular country of origin, nor could be studied for even a clue as
to her actual birth place. Erika Meyer doesn't know what the hell she
is talking about.
And
now Meyer brings in “mind control doctors”. Meyer claims many are
“linked” to India. Does she offer any statistics, any sources?
No. And what does any of this have to do with Ramola? Nothing
whatsoever. Just more pure speculation, in a shoddy attempt to “link”
Ramola to some sinister mind control operations.
And
no, “all” mind control is not “linked to frequency-based
stuff”. There are many methodologies used, which I won't bother to
describe. I will only say that it is clear that Erika Meyer is sorely
lacking in knowledge and understanding on this subject.
EM:
"Katherine Horton's video is a rehashing of this disinfo theatre.
Could it be KH is advocating for frequency-based attacks?
I
don't know what's the deal with Ramola, she is the first one that
came to me in a dream. I got hints about she wasn't exactly what she
seemed to be."
Meyer
does not clarify her meaning, regarding Katherine Horton; it all
sounds like gibberish.
And
no, she most certainly does NOT know anything about Ramola. She
claims that Ramola “came to her in a dream”. As usual, there is
no description given, only more vague speculation about “hints”
from a dream, in attempts to discredit Ramola and paint her as a
suspicious character.
Now,
she moves on to her next Target, Melanie Vritschan:
EM:
"Melanie is disinfo. I question if she was really pregnant, and had a
child. I'm not saying she was kidnapped by the hospital, not saying
she wasn't. I'm very skeptical."
Again,
nothing but pure speculation. But the toxic seed is planted: Melanie
might well be a liar, and all part of the so-called “disinformation
theatre”. And again, no evidence, just her subjective speculation.
But nonetheless, these false allegations could be very damaging to
Melanie's reputation.
EM:
"Katherine Horton is accusing Ramola of inducing people to lie...it's
all very confusing to me."
Well,
she finally admits being confused. Confusion is always what results
from engaging in wild speculation, with no concern for establishing
facts. But does that bother her? Clearly not, as she continues to
spew her uninformed idiocy.
EM:
"Katherine Horton is clearly very smart and a good public speaker."
KATHERINE HORTON: THE TIN FOIL PRINCESS
I
have seen no evidence of KH being “very smart”, based on her
prolific public videos. What I have seen is an accomplished liar, a
charlatan promoting false (and often contradictory) information,
which is then repeated and parroted by Horton's entourage of
sycophants and stooges.
Meyer's
idea of a “good public speaker” is a theatrical display by a
hysterical woman hunkering down in a tin-foil bunker, dropping
F-bombs and issuing calls to action for murder of public officials
and intelligence personnel? Or, droning on about “cartel
signaling”, or collecting affidavits for fantasy court cases, which
have never resulted in any justice for anyone foolish enough to join
her scams (or pay hefty fees for her “counseling services”).
Then,
Erika Meyer engages in more wild speculation about Horton's
ethnicity, and that, maybe, Katherine Horton is not her real name.
Again, no evidence is presented... maybe this, maybe that...maybe,
maybe maybe. What's her point? As usual, she doesn't say.
Now,
she goes back to her speculation on Ramola.
EM:
"I'm going to show what I found out online about Ramola."
She
shows a screen shot of one of those commercial sites used by amateur
sleuths, in the hope of digging up dirt on their enemies; sites that
are notorious for providing misleading or outright false information.
(Who cares? As long as they are raking in the money!)
Then,
she points back to Horton's “attack chart”, and draws attention
to the photo of “Barbara Hartwell (CIA)”.
EM:
"Just because it says Barbara Hartwell CIA doesn't mean her name
is really Barbara Hartwell. Does it mean she's really linked to the
CIA? No it just means somebody said these things."
Well,
what a brilliant piece of detective work! Duh.
But
for the record, Barbara Hartwell is my real name. And no, despite the
decades-long promotion of liars like Horton, that I am CIA, I have
been out of CIA for the past 26 years.
Meyer
moves back to the document on Ramola, continuing her speculation.
EM:
"Tanis, I never heard of anybody having this last name. Is there a
link to Egypt?"
Next,
a non-sequitur to the film Rosemary's Baby:
EM:
"There may be a link to Rosemary's Baby. It came out the year I
was born. She's given tanis root to wear around her neck, a bad
smelling herb, and now that I think about it there's indications of
induced suicides in the movie."
Tanis,
in fact, is simply a surname, with no sinister connotations, and not
at all uncommon. In her vast ignorance, Meyer “links” it to
TANNIS root (NOT “tanis”), and then babbles on that it is
“linked” to suicide...and a film produced in 1968...the year she
was born. So what? Many people were born in 1968. Does that make them
all “linked” to Rosemary's Baby?
Are
we watching The Twilight Zone? What's next...that the film was based
on Ramola's life as a mind control doctor, a Svengali whose victims
commit suicide? By Meyer's “logic”, anything is possible. But
none of it factual, none of it true.
Next,
she shows Ramola's photo, the one she uses on her website, and
proceeds with her profound “analysis”.
EM:
"Earring in left ear I believe... is coded as meaning a restriction
around the ear, and might also have to do with surveillance. The left
side is linked to me and Curtis (?) She is also pictured with the
right eye obscured so its a good thing to remember the deception. A
square shaped necklace, square is 4, probably a link to the emperor
and books behind her, she's a writer."
All
these imaginary “codes” and links”. What a lot of stupid
gibberish! Where she gets these silly ideas is anyone's guess, but
not worth the time to examine. According to Erika Meyer, wearing an
earring is a “code” for surveillance. That means, I guess, that
anyone who wears earrings is to be suspected of some sinister plot?
And she “links” the right eye to “deception”? And the square
shaped necklace is a “link” to “the emperor”. What emperor?
This
goes far beyond speculation into the realm of sheer nonsensical
idiocy.
But
it continues...
Meyer
now states that Ramola is “linked” to Arlington, Virginia.
EM:
"Arlington is linked with
military, and intelligence like the CIA kind of stuff. I think
Arlington is pretty close to... the name just blew out of my mind,
what's the name, McLean, is that the name? Very near where CIA
headquarters is."
So
now, she informs her audience that because the location of Arlington
appears on some site, along with Ramola's name, it MUST BE some
“link” to the military, to intelligence and to... (cue the drum
roll)...the nefarious world of CIA!
CIA
headquarters is in Langley. But so what? Now, according to the
flawless “logic” of Erika Meyer, anyone who ever lived anywhere
in the general area of Virginia, has “links” to CIA?
And
the babbling idiocy rolls on...
EM:
"I think it also links her to Michelle. What I'm getting to is the
idea that Ramola, like Katherine Horton, actually has a longstanding
history with me personally and with what I call the trafficking
system around me.
She
is in fact linked with me is a significant way, people who are linked
with me in a significant way often are referred to in a fictionalized
way."
Now,
it gets really bizarre. Erika Meyer is claiming that Ramola is
“linked” to her, by a “longstanding history”. And that there
is a “trafficking system” around her.
Does
she present any explanation of this history, or this trafficking
system? No, of course not. It is sheer delusional fantasy. And to
claim that this utter nonsense is a “fact” only shows how out of
touch with reality she must be.
Who
are the fictional characters? And who is Michelle? And why is she
exploiting Ramola's name in her attempt to weave a tall tale, in
which SHE, Erika Myer, appears to play a starring role?
Finally,
it ends with this:
"The
name Dharmaraj, she like Katherine Horton has a key role in a
longer standing relationship. It's possible that Ramola is linked to
Michelle so its link after link after link."
Erika
Meyer seems to be obsessed with “links”. Links that lead nowhere and exist only in
her mind, by virtue of her obvious psychopathology, mixed with
ignorance and plain old stupidity.
If
a link does not exist, no problem, she will fabricate one. And no
doubt, she will keep on babbling.
NO
FACTS.
NO
EVIDENCE.
NO
LOGIC.
NO
REASONABLE ARGUMENTS TO SUPPORT HER “CASE”.
By
their fruits shall you know them.
Barbara
Hartwell
January
24, 2020
PS:
Erika Meyer, next time you make one of your idiotic videos, LEAVE MY
NAME OUT, or take the consequences.