As
a hard-line defender of God-given unalienable individual rights, I
have many adversaries who are hell-bent on destroying my good name by
promoting outrageous falsehoods, malicious gossip, absolutely
diabolical calumny.
Of
course, the campaign of defamation was spawned by the utterly corrupt
satanic government which hijacked my life in childhood, but it has
expanded via the Internet, drawing in countless unprincipled
individuals, some of whom merely parrot the smears of
government-issue liars-for-hire, and others motivated by malice,
usually when their hypocrisy, dishonesty, their aggression, their
self-serving ambition, are exposed.
And
I must say, the leftists are by far the worst. Their ideology spits
in the face of everything I believe in, everything I love, all that I
have spent my life defending, and will continue to fight for, until
God sends the chariot to take me home.
Here are excerpts from reports (December, 2014 & November, 2016),
which exemplify the mentality of just a few of my adversaries, who
continue with their defamation of the name of Barbara Hartwell, to
this day.
For
me, it is all about the ISSUES and the consequences to this nation,
and for every individual who WILL stand up against tyranny, and who
WILL stand up for liberty, no matter the consequences to themselves.
It is about our children and grandchildren, and what they will
inherit.
As
for the leftists, the liars and hypocrites, as far as I am concerned,
they can go straight to their overlord, the devil, and take their
diabolical ideology with them!
Barbara
Hartwell Percival
October
3, 2017
UNITED
NATIONS: THE GREATEST THREAT TO SOVEREIGNTY, LIBERTY &
UNALIENABLE RIGHTS (2)
Globalism
by Deception & Hypocrisy
This
second part of the report covers material from previous reports, in
which the misdeeds of several individuals are exposed. I find the
most effective way to make my argument against the left-wing
agitators who operate by deception and hypocrisy is to bring their
own words into the spotlight. They are then easily refuted with
facts, evidence, reason and principle.
But
first, here is my analysis based on some of their typical tactics in
their attempts at gaining influence for their totalitarian agenda.
Use
of rhetoric comprised of noble-sounding (but deceptive) phrases.
Substitute
emotional appeals for a narrative based on facts.
Projection:
Accuse their ideological adversaries of what is actually true of
themselves. Make assumptions based on a false premise that “We are
all alike”, “We all want the same things”, or “We are all on
the same team”.
Group
think and herd mentality: Consensus that “We are all in this
together”, or “We must all agree” in order to achieve “peace”,
“justice”, “freedom”, etc.
Cite
“divisiveness” as the root cause of conflicts, in attempts to
reconcile irreconcilable differences, justify the unjustifiable,
defend the indefensible.
Label
any disagreement on issues as an “attack”.
Compromise:
Rather than take a solid position based on immutable principles,
weaken your stand, tainting it with incompatible ideologies.
“Peace”
at any price, whatever the sacrifice (justice, integrity, freedom,
truth....)
Substitute
“reconciliation” for justice, no matter how heinous the offense.
Replace
moral absolutes with moral relativism, situational ethics and social
engineering.
Attempt
to negotiate on non-negotiable issues (justice, integrity, freedom,
truth....)
Replace
the unalienable rights of the individual with the “common good”
of the collective.
The
ends justify the means: Nothing is sacred, nothing matters, except
that the desired schemes are implemented.
Replace
equal rights for one and all with “special rights” of any of a
number of designated groups.
Force
“legislation” of morality, rather than allow the rule of law to
prevail against actual criminals.
Cherry
pick the Constitution to support certain of their views, while
disregarding what does not serve their agenda.
Promote/support
anyone, especially public figures, who are also advocates of the UN,
globalism, regardless of their lack of honesty, integrity, or their
detestable track record of abuses of power, human rights violations,
criminality. “He's no angel, BUT...(fill in the blank with some
rhetoric which supports their position), or, “Nobody's perfect”,
BUT (more nonsensical rhetoric...)
The
“sob sister” mentality: Manipulation by engendering guilt,
wherever possible. It's “for the children”, “for the elderly”,
“for the disabled”, “for the disenfranchised”, “for the
poor”.
Use
“opposites” to label their opponents (defenders of Liberty,
unalienable rights of the individual). Label them “haters”,
accuse them of malice, animus, whenever they protest against
injustices or unconscionable actions of those who would steal their
liberty, their property or insult their honor.
Demonize
their opponents with false accusations, charges. Attribute false
motives to any who oppose them.
Smugly
claim the moral high ground against all who expose them or stand up
against them, no matter the issue, or how well-proven by facts,
evidence or principles by their opponents.
Pragmatism
vs. Principle: Negate principles in favor of “pragmatic”
solutions. No matter how unjust, how wrongful.
Use
flattery to insinuate themselves into the good graces of those they
can use for their own self-serving ends.
Seek
publicity anywhere they can find it, form alliances with anyone who
will have them, indiscriminately, and then exploit the credentials,
the influence of others, as means and opportunity permit. These
left-wing agitators are extremely aggressive and ambitious. They are
nothing if not opportunists.
Exploit
the suffering, the misfortunes of others, promote the cases of
legitimate whistleblowers, Targets/Victims of government persecution,
in order to gain “credibility” for themselves, which they then
use to further their own agenda, which has nothing to do with the
actual plight of those they exploit.
I
will begin with a notice posted on a website called FREEDOM FIGHTERS
FOR AMERICA, run by one Chris Zucker.
"I
DO NOT HAVE LIBERAL,GLOBALIST, NEW WORLD ORDER, FRIENDS, IF YOU ARE
NOT FOR THE CONSTITUTION AND FREEDOM, THEN YOU ARE THE TERRORIST
ENEMY!!
AND
ID BEING A LIBERAL IS TO RANSACK AND PLUNDER THIS COUNTRY, AND OTHER
LANDS AND HARM IT'S CITIZENS.
THEN
LET WE THE PATRIOTS, BE LIBERAL TO HANG LIBERALS AS
TRAITORS!!!!!!!!!!”
CHRIS
ZUCKER
PRESIDENT
FREEDOM
FIGHTERS FOR AMERICA
How
utterly bizarre. Mr. Zucker promotes left-wing agitator for globalism
and advocate for the UN, Janet Phelan, on his website, and has done
for many years. He has even listed her under the category of “HONEST
HEROS” (misspelled by Zucker.)
I
give this as just one example of a person so misguided that he not
only fails to see the smallest glimmer of truth about the New World
Order, but who has clearly been duped into believing that some of the
very individuals he supports (not only “LIBERALS”, but those who
have the mentality of communists) are his fellow PATRIOTS.
So,
Mr. Zucker wants all LIBERALS to hang! And he and his trusty band of
PATRIOTS will personally lead them to the gallows! That seems a bit
over the top to me, but Zucker is clearly only posturing with
sensationalism to gain attention. Well, he got some, but I doubt it
will help his cause. One can hope not...
LEFTIST
RHETORIC ON TRUTH TALK NEWS: Howard Nemaizer aka Nema
Howard
Nema (real name: Nemaizer) has notices posted on his websites stating
that he wants to restore constitutional government. Banners
proclaiming: GET US OUT OF THE U.N.!
Why
then does he so often engage in promotion of the flagrant left-wing
ideology spouted by Janet Phelan?
I've
been surprised more than once to see him nodding along while his
guest holds forth, inveighing against the principles of Liberty on
which this nation was founded.
On
one program Janet Phelan spoke about Hugo Chavez, his “leadership”,
how much “good” he had done for “his people”, how he was
loved by them, etc. etc. Never a challenge from Howard, never the
slightest disagreement. (Had there been, no doubt Janet Phelan would
have labeled it an “attack”.)
On
another program, in the same leftist vein, Janet Phelan spoke out
against capitalism, and actually tried (unsuccessfully) to draw a
parallel between capitalism and “attacks on First Amendment
Rights”.
Here,
the link posted by Janet Phelan:
"How
capitalism accommodates attacks on 1st Amendment Rights--Impromptu
with Howard Nema"
At
one point, in explaining her complaint against capitalism, she makes
the apparent disclaimer, “I'm not a socialist.” Really? Then
what's her point?
Maybe
Hugo Chavez can explain it:
"Capitalism
is the way of the devil and exploitation. If you really want to look
at things through the eyes of Jesus Christ - who I think was the
first socialist - only socialism can really create a genuine
society." (2006)
Hogwash!
Chavez clearly had not the slightest understanding of the Gospel of
Jesus Christ. Jesus was no socialist. Socialism is a system of forced
compliance with the dictates of the state, an odious form of bondage.
Jesus Christ proclaimed Liberty to the captives. Morality, spiritual
discernment, love of God and your neighbor, true Christian charity,
none of these can be legislated, they cannot be contrived, cannot be
forced on a population at the point of a gun. Which, when you're
dealing with leftists, is where it always, always ends up.
And
irony upon irony, Howard Nema titles the program:
THE
RISE OF GLOBAL TOTALITARIANISM
Howard
has a guest whose political ideology supports the very “global
totalitarianism” he claims to be dead set against. And he doesn't
see this?
AGITATING
FOR LEFT-WING MOB RULE: TOTALITARIANISM, THE U.N. & THE NEW WORLD
ORDER
It's
time to wrap up this segment. Just one quick anecdote regarding a
discussion I had with Howard Nema (2013), regarding the nature of the
political ideology espoused by Janet Phelan. As previously stated, I
did not bring up Janet Phelan's name to Howard after I had broken off
my association with her. I had said what I considered necessary, and
had no reason to revisit the issue.
But
one day I was having a discussion with Howard in which I outlined my
strict dedication to the principles of Liberty and God-given
unalienable individual rights. Howard's idea was that “everyone
sees things in a different way”. True, but if the way they “see”
things means that they will violate the unalienable rights of others,
fail to respect the privacy, the personal boundaries of others, or
try to force their viewpoints on others, then no true defender of
Liberty will tolerate such behavior. They may “see” it as they
will, but that right to “see” morphs into wrongdoing when they
fail to respect the rights of others, or take action to trample the
rights of others.
Howard
brought up Janet Phelan, in an apparent attempt to persuade me of the
value of what she had to offer in terms of defending human rights and
related issues. My answer was as follows: You cannot claim to be a
“defender” or “protector” of “rights” if you fail to
acknowledge the ultimate supremacy of the God-given unalienable
rights of the INDIVIDUAL.
Janet
Phelan, by her own admission, and by her many statements advocating
for the U.N. and “left-wing politics” (her own words) is in favor
of compromising, modifying, adulterating the rights of the individual
in service to the dictates of a collective.
And
finally, in terms of a clear overview, I explained my position by
asking Howard to consider this scenario:
One
person (for example, in this case, Janet Phelan) decides that she
will dedicate much time and effort in attempts to influence people
(via her writings, radio appearances, etc.) to believe that left-wing
ideology is not only acceptable, but preferable; that it has merit in
that it contains solutions to various problems; will result in
improving the lives of the citizens of a country, will “affirm our
basic humanity”, and so on and so forth...
As
a result of her efforts, some of the audience she is addressing
(those who lack discernment and don't think for themselves) are
actually influenced to join in and support what she is promoting. And
remember, according to Janet, she already has a “large following”.
(This statement was in fact made on Howard Nema's show.) Her work is
posted on numerous large commercial sites on the Internet, spanning
an entire spectrum from those who profess “conservatism” to those
who are openly leftist, New Age, secular humanist.
(And
remember, Janet Phelan is only one person. How many others are there,
embracing and promoting the same ideology?)
Over
time, more and more people jump on the Leftist Bandwagon, and soon
they themselves are spouting the same ideology, and become agitators,
not only by their words, but now by their actions. (For example, they
get sucked in by the rhetoric, and join the 'Occupy' movement.)
Soon,
as the mob of leftists gains momentum, U.N. Treaties gain
signatories. Legislation that defies the Constitution is passed. A
person's right to keep and
bear
arms is “signed away” by meddlers from the U.N. Now, the
unconstitutional legislation becomes “law”.
What's
next? The U.N. decides that they have the right to invade our
sovereign republic with impunity, for the “common good”, to
“protect human rights”, to “keep the peace”. (After all, the
welcome mat has been rolled out, is ready and waiting for such an
invasion.)
Meanwhile,
the criminals run rampant, because criminals don't respect the law,
nor anyone's unalienable rights (never have, never will) and they
still have guns and ammo, which they will use in assaults against the
citizenry. Robbery, rape, murder, mayhem, all at the point of THEIR
guns.
But
where are YOUR guns and ammo? Nowhere to be found, they've been
confiscated by lawless men (or women) with badges and guns (operating
under the color of law), who are “just following orders”, orders
given by tyrants who themselves are “following orders”, the
directives of even bigger tyrants at the top of the global food
chain.
This
is how totalitarianism is achieved, by recruiting one individual at a
time, then groups of individuals, using propaganda (especially
manipulation by engendering guilt: It's for the children, for the
disenfranchised; for the elderly; for the disabled, etc. etc.),
pressure tactics, and finally, threats.
At
long last, a paramilitary team is standing on your doorstep,
brandishing their weaponry, pointing guns in your face, in your
wife's/husband's face, while your children or grandchildren huddle in
fear in the background.
You
will do what we say, or we will lock you up, or kill you.
How
then, can you possibly stop them?
Hitler
did it, Stalin did it, Chairman Mao did it...and on and on it
goes....
The
objectives of each of these tyrants (and many others throughout the
course of history) were the same: TO STRIP YOU OF YOUR GOD-GIVEN,
UNALIENABLE RIGHTS & LIBERTIES, TO CONTROL EVERY ASPECT OF YOUR
LIFE & DESTINY. And they gained this power because the people, AS
INDIVIDUALS, failed to stand up and stop them.
Totalitarianism,
courtesy of the New World Order.
Don't
be fooled: The promotion and support of even one leftist opens the
door, throws out the welcome mat, for more leftists, and their
godforsaken globalist totalitarianism. And who is to be held
accountable for all this?
Every
single person who is a part of it, every person who encouraged it,
who aided and abetted the mob of leftists (or just one) in any way,
shape or form.
When
I finished my little stump speech, Howard told me, “I never thought
of it that way.”
And apparently, he's decided to continue NOT to
think of it that way. That is his prerogative, but at least I know
that I did what I could in service to the truth. I can only offer the
truth to anyone willing to listen, but I won't try to force it on
anyone.
And
with this, I conclude this report.
I
implore all Liberty-loving Patriots, Defenders of Unalienable Rights,
of the Sovereignty of this Constitutional Republic, to take a closer
look, a hard look, at those claiming to be what they so clearly are
not. Only a few are mentioned here, but they are legion.
You
will find their propaganda on numerous high-traffic commercial
websites. You will hear their deceptive rhetoric booming out on the
airwaves.
But
what of their actions? Whom and what do they actually support?
Whom
do they attack with their libelous/slanderous falsehoods?
They
are deceivers and hypocrites, merchants of false hope, masquerading
as patriots, freedom fighters, opponents of the New World Order.
They
are the enemies of Liberty, while claiming to champion it.