PART
THREE
Please read PARTS ONE & TWO before continuing.
RECAP
& A TIMELINE OF EVENTS
In
review of the facts:
After
29 days (November 22-December 21, 2013), I left Howard Nemaizer's
house as per the directive issued by his wife, Maureen Nemaizer,
specifically that I be OUT BY NOON on that date. As previously
stated, Howard Nemaizer had lied when he told me that I would be
welcomed into their home by his wife, and I did not find out the
truth until after I had accepted his offer of “sanctuary”.
This
directive was issued in full knowledge of the fact that I, as a
disabled senior citizen, was utterly destitute and under persecution,
that I had nowhere else to go, and that I also was responsible for
the care of my beloved companion, an elderly cat, whom I refused to
abandon under any circumstances.
False
promises had been made by Howard Nemaizer re his offer of
“sanctuary”. It turned out to be a bait-and-switch. For what end,
I don't know. I no longer care what the motives may have been. I only
know the facts, and the terrible things which happened to me as a
result. Nemaizer reneged on all assurances given, resulting in
extreme stress, losses of my property, and other damages, rather than
the promised “sanctuary”.
Nemaizer
compromised my security and endangered my safety by enlisting a
drunk-driving convict, one David St. John, to unlawfully drive my car
from Maine to CT, without my knowledge or consent. I only learned of
this after the fact. I was, naturally, outraged at this act of
reckless endangerment and negligence by Howard Nemaizer.
The
conditions in the basement where I stayed for 29 days were unfit for
human habitation. (See previous reports for details.) I had been
told they had a “room” available. No mention was made of the fact
that it was a basement, or of the actual deplorable conditions. My
health, already poor, suffered terribly as a result of the cold, damp
and toxic mold.
I
was treated with extreme disrespect by Howard and Maureen Nemaizer,
as well as suffering similar abusive treatment by their friends, all
of whom were ill-mannered, crude, aggressive, intrusive busybodies,
snooping into my private business, dishing out unsolicited advice,
and speculating and gossiping about my personal business with anyone
who would lend an ear.
After
the directive was issued that I must be OUT BY NOON, on December 21,
Howard and Maureen Nemaizer attempted to pressure me into staying at
the homes of complete strangers (more basements, I was told), one of
whom was verbally abusive to me, and later arrived at their house so
intoxicated that he fell down drunk and passed out cold in the
driveway. (No, as God is my witness, I am not making this up...this
is the truth. More bizarre details are given in previous reports.)
They
used pressure tactics to try to make me accept totally inappropriate
accomodations, which would have meant abandoning my cat, or that I
place myself at risk, at the mercy of unstable and unscrupulous
characters, who were total strangers. When I firmly refused, they
harassed me and tried to place blame on me, simply for acting in the
interests of my own protection.
Howard
Nemaizer repeatedly (and smugly) said to me, “You do what you've
got to do.” AS IF placing myself or my cat in harm's way were the
solution to the dire emergency in which I had been placed by HIS
wrongful and utterly irresponsible actions.
Maureen
Nemaizer actually suggested that I should go to a “homeless
shelter”. UN- friggin'-believable. But, as God is my witness, true.
As
it was, I was fortunate to have escaped that godforsaken place, that
nest of hissing vipers, with body and soul intact.
Had
there been a script, written by some demonic entity, and had players
been cast in the roles, for the purpose of causing maximum damage,
extreme stress, pain and suffering, it could not have been more
perfectly orchestrated.
AFTER
THE ESCAPE FROM NEMAIZER'S DUNGEON
The
only contact I had with Nemaizer after December 21, 2013 was a couple
of phone calls, on necessary business, such as asking him to send my
mail, which had been forwarded to his address after I left. He told
me a package had come for me, which I asked him to send to my new
address. But he never sent it.
The
last contact I had with Howard Nemaizer was in May, 2014, when I
spoke to him on the phone in order to make arrangements for movers I
had hired to retrieve my possessions from his house.
I
subsequently discovered that Nemaizer had stolen a number of my
possessions, of great value to me, which I had left in plain sight in
his basement. The mail forwarded to me at his house was also missing
when the delivery was made.
And
I learned from the movers that Nemaizer had invaded my privacy by
discussing my personal business with them, after he had assured me he
would not discuss my business with anyone after I left. (Fat
chance... a busybody's work is never done...) It was a simple
business transaction, between me and the movers, paid for and
arranged solely by me. The moving men had no need to know anything
except the two addresses to pick up and deliver my possessions, which
I had given them –not the story of my life, as told by Howard
Nemaizer. He later fabricated and published an absurd and defamatory
tale in attempts to justify his wrongful actions of gossiping about
me with the movers, bending their ears with some kind of
cloak-and-dagger stories about Barbara Hartwell, and how they could
--Extra! Extra! read all about it!-- on “Truth Talk News”.
Considering
the entire ordeal, how I had been grossly mistreated, lied to, and
then only barely escaped being thrown into the street, all the
losses, damages and extreme distress caused by Howard Nemaizer, I
wanted no further dealings with him.
I
can't imagine that any reasonable, self-respecting person would feel
differently, but speaking strictly for myself, I don't allow anyone
to treat me with such absolute disrespect. Nemaizer, his wife, and
their friends had ZERO respect for my privacy, my personal boundaries
or even my fundamental rights.
So,
once my belongings had been delivered (what was left of them), I had
decided, quite reasonably, not to have further contact with Howard
Nemaizer. He had revealed himself as extremely dishonest and
untrustworthy, a liar and a thief. He never apologized to me, nor
ever even acknowledged any of his wrongful actions.
I
had not raised any of these issues with him, nor had any interest in
discussing them after the fact, as there would have been no point.
Shocking as it was, it was clear to me that he actually did not think
he had done anything wrongful, and that the totally insufferable way
he, his wife and friends behaved, their standards for the way they
treat others, was “normal”, just business as usual, as far as he
was concerned. Lies, deception, manipulation, meddling, gossip, total
lack of manners, and no respect for the privacy and personal
boundaries of others.
When,
while still at his house, I had protested the pushy, intrusive and
utterly disrespectful behavior of his wife towards me, he only gave a
casual shrug and said, “That's just the way she was raised.” AS
IF that makes such treatment acceptable? Not in my book. That is most
certainly NOT the way I was raised, nor were these the type of people
I was used to associating with.
HOWARD
NEMAIZER'S PUBLIC EXPLOITATION
But
here is the primary issue: had he not chosen to PUBLICLY exploit and
misrepresent my name, I could have simply cut my losses, painful as
they were, and quietly walked away. When possible, that is my
preference. If it's not a public issue, I see no reason to make it
one.
But
Howard Nemaizer's continuing aggressive and wrongful actions made it
absolutely necessary for me to act in my own defense.
This
is where the public issues began, when Nemaizer started dropping my
name all over his websites, in his videos, and especially in
connection with false information, fraudulent notices, and in
promoting my name in connection with individuals whom he knew I had
publicly denounced, for cause.
The
point here is that Howard Nemaizer was KNOWINGLY promoting FALSE
information. He knew it was false, but did not care.
Nemaizer
also used my name on the same page with a career criminal/predicate
felon by the name of Keith Mutch, convicted on multiple counts of
felony arson, arrested for making false police reports, and who was
cited by authorities for promoting false information re other crimes
on his websites. From all that I read, this character, Keith Mutch,
was nothing less than a public menace. He was also (which came as no
surprise) a friend of Howard Nemaizer, who was airing his program,
“Truth Talk News”, on Mutch's radio station, a heavy metal
network which used demonic imagery of a flaming skeleton as an icon,
along with photos of devil-worshipers. Needless to say, I was
outraged that MY NAME appeared as a so-called “TRUSTED PARTNER IN
TRUTH”, in connection with promotions of this criminal psychopath,
Keith Mutch.
As
if all this were not bad enough, I discovered that Nemaizer had
engaged in theft of audio and video, the property of Barbara
Hartwell, which he had published without my knowledge or consent,
violating a good faith verbal agreement. He also wrongfully
appropriated the name I had chosen for these audiotapes, The Barbara
Hartwell Chronicles, thus depriving me of the fruits of my labor.
(Note
the phrase: “without my knowledge or consent”. It appears
repeatedly in my reports exposing the M.O. of Howard Nemaizer, and
exemplifies his total disregard for the privacy, personal boundaries
and rights of others. He arrogantly co-opts and exploits what belongs
by rights to others, without any concern for the damage done to
them.)
I
was not aware of any of these public promotions which exploited and
misrepresented the name of Barbara Hartwell, and stole the fruits of
my labor, not until late in 2014. I don't spend much time on the
Internet and would have had no reason to seek out anything connected
to Howard Nemaizer. I would have been happy to forget about his
existence entirely, but due to his continuing aggression, that was
not possible.
When
I discovered that Howard Nemaizer had been heavily exploiting my
name, and that he had been misrepresenting me, I published a report
in which I requested, politely and “with all due respect”, that
he REMOVE the false information in connection with my name, and in
the videos of his TV show, “Truth Talk News”. I was very specific
in citing the false information, which left no room for doubt.
Especially
offensive was his notice, “TRUSTED PARTNERS IN TRUTH”, where my
name and website were misrepresented and exploited for the purposes
of self-promotion by Howard Nemaizer. None of the names listed
(including his own, the pseudonym “Howard Nema”), were, or had
ever been “partners” of Barbara Hartwell. Two of the names, Harry
Link and Janet Phelan, were of persons I had publicly denounced, for
cause, of which Howard Nemaizer was well aware.
I
published my first request that he remove the false information from
his sites on December 15, 2014. From that time, I checked
periodically to see if he had removed the items. He had not. I waited
for two months, which I considered a reasonable period of time. When
I realized that Howard Nemaizer had simply chosen to disregard my
clearly stated request, I found it necessary to make a demand (rather
than the request) that he remove the false information and fraudulent
notices.
Because
the false information (damaging to my good name) had been
disseminated in a public venue, I found it necessary to make my
request, and later, demands, publicly, rather than privately.
Now,
during the same time period (February, 2015), I received a letter by
post from Howard Nemaizer, sent to my PO box, the address given on my
website. He did not have any contact info for me (phone or e-mail),
because I had not given it to him, for what by now should be obvious
reasons. As stated, my last contact with him had been connected to
the moving of my possessions, in May, 2014.
I
was amazed at what I was seeing in his letter. Nemaizer's attitude
towards me was oh-so-casual, just as if nothing had happened, nothing
were amiss.
He
went on to talk about Harry Link, the owner of “Truth Broadcast
Network”, and how he was (once again) leaving that network. He
stated:
"I
am going solo. About 2 weeks ago I left TBN. From now on I will only
be promoting my own website, HowardNema.com and my livestream and
youtube pages.
This
came about after some ego-driven shenanigans on the part of Harry
Link regarding [names removed] Facebook groups, where Harry was
accused of deleting posts and creating fake accounts and other
“questionable” stuff. Once again, I fell in the middle of others'
disputes. [X and X] are very close friends, as are you and I didn't
feel comfortable promoting Harry or Truth Broadcast Network, or any
other as a result."
But
why tell me all this? It had nothing to do with me. I had no
involvement in any way with the individuals mentioned, nor have I
ever been a participant in social networks. Nor was I ever involved
in any of the “disputes” he mentions.
He
was well aware of my very negative opinion of Harry Link and his
network, and had been since 2012. In fact, I had publicly stated in
2012 that I could not in good conscience promote “Truth Talk News”,
because it was airing on that network. I had also stated that I
wanted my name REMOVED from all promotions on “Truth Talk News”.
I
mean exactly what I say, and say exactly what I mean, always have,
always will. Nothing had changed regarding my position on Harry Link
or his network, nor had I ever stated (publicly or privately)
anything which would have contradicted my position on this issue.
And
yet, Howard Nemaizer had included MY name in his “TRUSTED PARTNERS
IN TRUTH”, along with Harry Link, with no concern or respect
whatsoever for my clearly stated wishes. And I repeat: I had stated
these things PUBLICLY, since 2012.
And
he considers me a “very close friend”? After what he had put me
through? Again, I was amazed at his total lack of perception of the
reality of the situation. No “friend” of mine would ever treat me
in such a way.
Next,
Nemaizer has this to say:
"Well,
we all have our problems, but I certainly do not need additional
conflict in my life and I must think of my own reputation."
Unbelievable.
He is thinking only of his own reputation. Nemaizer blames Harry
Link, when it was HIS choice to go back and forth, back and forth, on
and off Harry Link's network. But more to the point, why did he have
NO concern about MY reputation, and the damage he was doing with his
fraudulent promotions, placing MY NAME in connection with Harry Link,
completely disregarding my clearly stated position?
Then,
Nemaizer stated:
"Please
accept my apologies for anything I have done that has upset you
regarding my work since we last spoke. I read and continue to read
your reports."
By
this statement, Nemaizer had acknowledged that he had been reading my
reports, and had seen my request to REMOVE the false and fraudulent
material. (December 15, 2014)
But
did he honor my request? No. It seems he simply assumed that he could
get over with a half-baked private “apology”, when in fact it was
a PUBLIC issue. As if all this false information and
misrepresentation of my name was no big deal, something to just be
swept under the carpet and forgotten.
Therefore,
the apology was meaningless and insincere. The issue was
non-negotiable, and had never been up for discussion. The damage to
my name and reputation had been done. He refused to rectify it, nor
even acknowledge it.
His
vague statement, “anything I have done” is also telling. I stated
EXACTLY what he had done, which was that he had published FALSE
INFORMATION in connection with my name, and made it crystal clear
that I wanted it REMOVED.
Now
this:
"I
will of course adhere to your wishes of privacy. I do not wish to be
involved in any conflict. i.e. Janet Phelan or with anyone else. As
you respect me, I respect you. I consider you a good, close friend
and hope you still consider me the same."
But
how can he claim he would adhere to my wishes of privacy, after he
had exploited my name all over his websites, and even stolen my
material, violating a good faith verbal agreement, and then
DISREGARDED my request to REMOVE it? Is he delusional? Or just
arrogant as all hell, thinking he has the right to take anything he
wants from me, without so much as a 'by your leave'.
And
he actually claims to “respect” me? After his extreme disrespect
of me, of my privacy, personal boundaries, and fundamental rights.
Meanwhile,
only a day before I received Nemaizer's letter by post, I had
published my first demand that he remove the false, fraudulent
material which misrepresented my name.
That
is when Howard Nemaizer took an even more disrespectful and
aggressive stance against Barbara Hartwell. In fact, it was utterly
outrageous.
Shortly
thereafter, I found a notice posted on Nemaizer's website, “Howard
Nema dot com”. Here it is, in its entirety:
"BARBARA
HARTWELL HAS NO AFFILIATION TO ME OR TRUTH TALK NEWS."
"Sadly,
I am forced to post this. I will not spend hours deleting TRUSTED
PARTNERS IN TRUTH from more than 200 posts on this website going back
to Feb 2014 at the request of Barbara Hartwell, unless she would like
to pay me for my time.
I
move ahead, not backwards.
But
for the record I have NO AFFILIATION with ANY GROUP, NETWORK or
association. Truth Talk News and HowardNema.com are free and
independent.
No
posts in the future will mention or include Barbara Hartwell’s
name. Furthermore, I kindly ask Barbara Hartwell to stop invading my
privacy as she so often claims that others do to her.
This
should end it all."
"BARBARA
HARTWELL HAS NO AFFILIATION TO ME OR TRUTH TALK NEWS."
"By
the way, Barbara, you are very welcome for all the financial and
other support I rendered to you over the years.
In
closing, I truly regret my acts of kindness and charity given to
Barbara Hartwell, who I feel is a terribly ungrateful soul.
Barbara,
please leave me and my sites out of your reports in the future. I
will never mention your name again and I expect you to do the same
about me. Thank
you.
Enjoy your life and your solitude.
God
bless you.
Howard
Nema"
So
now, rather than removing the offensive material, I am assaulted with
more falsehoods, which not only have no basis in fact, but are
defamatory.
Nemaizer
begins with this statement:
"Sadly,
I am forced to post this."
Forced
how? Did someone hold a gun to his head? This is an absurd statement,
an attempt to defend the indefensible, namely the exploitation and
misrepresentation of my name.
I
had given him the opportunity to rectify his offenses. Any decent,
honorable person would have immediately removed the name of the
injured party, along with any and all false information connected to
it. He would have issued a public retraction and an apology. But not
Howard Nemaizer.
Instead,
Nemaizer chose to attack me with more falsehoods. And, arrogantly
states that he REFUSES to remove the offensive material:
"I
will not spend hours deleting TRUSTED PARTNERS IN TRUTH from more
than 200 posts on this website going back to Feb 2014 at the request
of Barbara Hartwell, unless she would like to pay me for my time."
So
now, he admits that his fraudulent notice, which exploited and
misrepresented the name of Barbara Hartwell, has been heavily
promoted for the last year (February 2014- February 2015).
My
friend Geral Sosbee, upon reading this arrogant statement from
Nemaizer, was outraged, as I was. In my defense, he wrote:
"Mr.
Nema,
One
cannot move ahead unless he corrects his errors of the past. As for
payment, Barbara deserves payment for the countless hours spent
trying to stop misrepresentations of her on your site."
"Furthermore,
I kindly ask Barbara Hartwell to stop invading my privacy as she so
often claims that others do to her."
This
statement makes no sense whatsoever, and what's more, it is a false
accusation. I had never, at any time, invaded Howard Nemaizer's
privacy. Note that he does not specify what these alleged “invasions
of privacy” would be. But that is typical of a malicious liar like
Nemaizer. He has no facts, he has no grounds for his false
accusations, so he fabricates, and accuses me of the very offenses he
himself has committed.
"By
the way, Barbara, you are very welcome for all the financial and
other support I rendered to you over the years."
"All
the financial and other support"? And, "over the years"?
First
of all, he now brings up a totally irrelevant issue. My request,
followed by demands, to cease and desist from exploiting and
misrepresenting my name, had absolutely NOTHING to do with any
“financial and other support” he claims to have given.
Secondly,
from mid-2012, when I first came in contact with Howard Nemaizer,
until December 2013, when I saw the last of him (thank the Good
Lord!), does not constitute “years”. Another lie.
"In
closing, I truly regret my acts of kindness and charity given to
Barbara Hartwell, who I feel is a terribly ungrateful soul."
Now,
he contradicts himself. First, “You are very welcome”, and then,
“I truly regret”. His attempt at sarcasm falls flat and is just
plain stupid.
As
for the so-called “acts of kindness and charity”, no, I am
certainly not “grateful” for the massive irreparable damages and
losses, the extreme stress and trauma I suffered because of Howard
Nemaizer's dishonesty, his many false promises and his callous
disregard for my safety.
In
fact there is only one truthful, factual statement given in this
whole notice:
"BARBARA
HARTWELL HAS NO AFFILIATION TO ME OR TRUTH TALK NEWS."
To
be more exact, there had NEVER been any affiliation with Howard
Nemaizer or “TRUTH TALK NEWS”. And yet, even with this admission
of “no affiliation”, he still refuses to remove the fraudulent
notice, “TRUSTED PARTNERS IN TRUTH”. Unless of course, he is PAID
for his time, to remove his OWN FALSEHOODS.
Then,
he states:
"Barbara,
please leave me and my sites out of your reports in the future. I
will never mention your name again and I expect you to do the same
about me."
Clearly,
Nemaizer falsely believes that he stands on equal ground by making
this request. The fact is, HE is the ONLY offender, HE is the ONLY
aggressor, HE is the ONLY wrongdoer. He has no legal or ethical
ground whatsoever to stand on.
Any
and all reports in which his name and websites were exposed by me had
ONLY to do with defending myself and my reputation against HIS false
and fraudulent notices and promotions. Which he now states that he
REFUSES to remove, unless he is PAID for his time.
Note
also that he states “I will never mention your name again”. That
too is a bald faced lie, as shown by his subsequent article
(November, 2015), filled with additional outrageous lies, monstrous
invasions of my and my family's privacy, and overflowing with
defamation galore.
But
by bringing in an unrelated issue, that being his claims of
“financial and other support” and “acts of kindness and
charity given to Barbara Hartwell”, he now makes it necessary for
me to act in my own defense, yet again.
He
has taken a position, which he has made very clear:
He
refuses to remove the offensive and fraudulent material, which
misrepresents and exploits the name of Barbara Hartwell.
He
has made a false and defamatory accusation, with his claim that I
have “invaded his privacy”.
By
dragging in his irrelevant claims of “financial and other support”
and “acts of kindness and charity”, he now sets himself up for
me to address and refute those claims, as always, in my own defense.
Then,
as can hardly be believed, he states:
"This
should end it all."
By
stating “this should end it all”, he could not possibly be
further from the perception of the reality, much less the principle,
of this issue.
Why
would I allow this malicious liar to continue to exploit and
misrepresent my name? Why would I remain silent when he then
publishes additional false information, and why would I ever accept
that he refuses to remove the fraudulent material?
On
the contrary, I now found it necessary to address his false claims of
Barbara Hartwell as a “terribly ungrateful soul”, as “invading
his privacy”, and his vain boasting of his “acts of kindness and
charity”. Along with continuing to protest his arrogant refusal to
remove the offensive material from his websites, which was the
original issue.
Which
is exactly what I did. More outraged than ever by Howard Nemaizer's
continuing aggression, misrepresentations and total disrespect, I
wrote detailed reports, which left no doubt about Nemaizer's
wrongful actions, his many lies and false promises, and the horrible
consequences to me.
More
time passed. And not only were the fraudulent notices left in place,
I continued to discover that my name had been dropped into even more
places than I had previously seen.
It
became ever more clear to me that Howard Nemaizer had appointed
himself as an unwanted, uninvited PR rep for Barbara Hartwell, in
hopes of making a name for himself by riding my coattails.
He
had been pretending to knowledge he did not have, adding to it his
own wild speculation and unwarranted assumptions. And EXPLOITING MY
NAME in connection with all of his trash, which consisted of nothing
more than his uninformed opinions.
I
was not only outraged, but horrified at the damage that this
aggressive little upstart, this amateur wannabe, had done, all for
his own self-serving ends.
As
anyone who has had their name exploited and misrepresented by
gate-crashers like Nemaizer will understand, it is nearly impossible
to undo the damage. Unless you have the resources to file a lawsuit,
the only thing to be done is to counter the fraudulent material with
the truth, and to expose the wrongdoer.
Unlike
Howard Nemaizer, the truth really does matter to me. In defense of
the truth, and of my good name, I continued to expose the false and
fraudulent promotions of Nemaizer, on his idiotically misnamed site,
“Truth Talk News”, time-consuming and tiresome as it was.
HOWARD
NEMAIZER STRIKES AGAIN: OUTRAGEOUS LIES, DEFAMATION & MONSTROUS
INVASIONS OF PRIVACY
Now,
moving forward to November, 2015. Last I had checked, Nemaizer had
still not removed the fraudulent promotions. But now, he had
ratcheted up his offensive by publishing the worst, most injurious,
most defamatory article ever to spew forth from his twisted, devious
little mind.
I've
already addressed and refuted the many additional libelous
falsehoods, but for the purpose of completing this timeline, here are
just some of the statements made by this malicious pathological liar,
Howard Nemaizer.
He
begins with this:
"I
have learned through friends that Barbara Hartwell has been
maliciously attacking and spreading lies about me."
This
is a vague statement. What “lies” are these? He does not specify.
I have never, at any time, “maliciously attacked” Howard
Nemaizer. Nor have any lies about him been published by me. If he
wants to make this claim, let him name the “lies”, otherwise it
is meaningless.
More
false accusations:
"BH
‘s obsession with trying to discredit me should be very revealing
to those who know me and my work; and now the absence of any of the
material BH claims I refuse to remove should set the record straight.
But BH keeps stalking me and posting disinformation."
More
idiocy from Howard Nemaizer. He interprets my righteous outrage at
his aggression and wrongdoing, and my attempts only to STOP HIM, as
“obsession”. He has discredited himself by his own actions, he
needs no help from me. As for "disinformation"? He clearly does not know the meaning of the word.
I
wonder, to whom does he refer? Those who know him? His so-called
“work” consists of copying material written by others, outright
plagiarism, and wild speculation. So he drags in unknown third
parties, trying to make it seem as if he has support in his
unconscionable actions. If so, it could only be from his fellow
liars, not from anyone I would know, or care to know.
This
blithering idiot believes the record could ever be “set straight”
by HIM, the liar, the aggressor, the opportunist? No, to set the
record straight requires the truth and the facts, which Nemaizer
entirely lacks.
Suddenly,
he claims there is “absence” of material? No, it was still there
at the time of this statement by Nemaizer. But even were some of it
removed, so what? His twisted perspective, entirely lacking in any
standard of reason and ethics, is clear for those with eyes to see.
Nemaizer's
statements are utterly preposterous. Taking necessary action to stop
an aggressive gate-crasher from exploiting my name and publishing
false information and fraudulent notices is my standard policy. There
is no obsession involved, just business as usual. He wasn't the first
and I doubt he'll be the last. It is the nature of the beast, for his
ilk.
Now,
he accuses me of “stalking” him? How moronic. Publishing notices
demanding that a liar remove false information could not possibly
qualify as stalking. A stalker is one who engages in pursuing a
Target by unwanted communications, phone calls, letters, e-mails, or
following on foot, in a vehicle, etc.
I have done no such
things, ever. I have had no communication with Howard Nemaizer since
May, 2014 (on a necessary business matter), nor wanted any, nor
attempted any. In fact, I have publicly notified him that any further
attempts to contact me will be regarded as harassment. Nemaizer, in
one such attempt at unwanted communication, sent a letter by post to
my PO box. I instructed the postal clerk to stamp the letter REFUSED
and return to sender.
Is he delusional, or what? More likely,
just once again projecting his own unscrupulous behavior on me.
Nemaizer,
the liar, then states:
"In
any case, BH benefited far more from our association than I did,
despite her lies, cries of outrage and crocodile tears."
I
cut off any association with Nemaizer at the end of 2013, for good,
by my own choice, so what's his point? Maybe he should consider the
very salient fact that had he not continued to pursue an association
with me, unwanted on my part, and had he had the common decency to
stop exploiting my name, none of my public protests of his wrongdoing
would have been necessary.
Howard Nemaizer has brought all
this on himself. He chose his own misguided actions. He is one of
those people whose compulsive, pathological aggression will not allow
him to take NO for answer. He will keep pushing and pushing, refusing
to acknowledge his own errors and offenses, until he finally provokes
righteous outrage from the subject of his aggression. Then, he will
feign innocence of any wrongdoing. That is passive-aggressive
behavior and typical of busybodies, who just can't seem to mind their
own business, but refuse to be held accountable for their offensive
actions.
He
continued to obstinately disregard my righteous protests of his
wrongful actions, his aggression and provocations. He has always been
the aggressor, not I. Righteous outrage on my part is a given, and
this surprises him?
For him to claim that I have “benefited”
in any way from an association with him is a bald-faced lie, as well
as utterly ludicrous and delusional. He doesn't speak for me, and the
fact of the matter is that the brief association I had with Howard
Nemaizer has brought nothing but trouble, losses, damages and grief
into my life. And it is ongoing to this day, as shown by his latest
offensive against me.
This, from an aggressive gate-crasher
who attempted to horn in on MY professional business, who has
shamelessly exploited MY name for his own self-serving ends; who has
promoted fraudulent notices in deceptive efforts to make it appear
that I am a “partner” of several persons (including himself) when
it holds not a grain of truth.
He calls me a liar, when all
the documented evidence I have furnished, in numerous reports and
notices, clearly shows that he is the sole liar,
and that he is projecting his pathological behavior on me.
More
idiocy from Howard Nemaizer:
"You
revealed your true self by attacking me. And I am sorry we ever met,
Barbara.
Honestly, much as I thought I knew Barbara Hartwell,
I clearly did not know her at all . But I know her now and I know her
game:
By their fruits shall we know them.
This is the
only and final response to BH."
"Honestly”
is not a word which has anything to do with Howard Nemaizer, but
typical that he would use it in attempts to cover his deception.
“The only and final response”. Another of Howard
Nemaizer's many lies and contradictory statements. What about the
other defamatory notice on his website, of February 24, 2015, in
which he states:
"No
posts in the future will mention or include Barbara Hartwell’s
name."
Really? Then what in the bloody hell is this new piece of
scurrilous trash he has posted?
Now, here's some idiocy. Of
course he never knew me. If he had done, he would never have been
foolish enough to mess with me, nor would he assume that I would
tolerate such unconscionable behavior. I don't tolerate such behavior
from anyone, so why would he be an exception?
He didn't know
me then, and he sure as hell doesn't know me now. He will never know
me, which suits me just fine, as long as he gets the hell off my case
and leaves me alone. That is my one and only wish as regards Howard
Nemaizer.
"By
their fruits shall we know them."
Here,
Nemaizer parrots a (mis)quote from scripture, which he knows I have
frequently used in my reports, including in reference to him
personally, in an attempt to once again twist things around to blame
me for his own wrongdoing.
There
is no game here, only the brutal truth, which Nemaizer is too blind,
by far, to see. And for Nemaizer's edification, you can't get good
fruit from a poisonous tree, and the poisonous issue of lies,
aggression, and a self-serving agenda is all I have ever seen as
regards the fruits he bears.
Nemaizer
now embellishes his attack on my character with this:
"I
think she thought she had found another sucker to pay her bills. Her
vindictive attacks are as relentless as her pursuit of donations."
What
in the bloody hell is this supposed to mean? “Another sucker”?
Nemaizer, the habitual liar and character assassin, now makes yet
another outrageously false statement.
At no time did I ever
ask Nemaizer to pay my bills, nor did he ever do any such thing. And
I have never in my life sought out any “suckers” for this
purpose, nor engaged in any such unscrupulous activity. The sources
of my material support are, once again, none of Nemaizer's damnable
business.
As for the donations he makes reference to, that is
also none of Nemaizer's concern. I have the right to solicit
donations to support my work, just as many other journalists and
whistleblowers do. And as I have clearly stated in notices on my
website, all donations, given in the spirit of Christian charity, or
love gifts, no questions asked, no strings attached, are gratefully
accepted, with the understanding that they are to be used at the sole
discretion of Barbara Hartwell.
Nemaizer, aggressive busybody
that he is, seems to be deluded in his belief that any “donations”
by him would entitle him to meddle in my business, or to appoint
himself as the Town Crier, publicly commenting on my financial
affairs.
"Barbara
Hartwell is a coward. She is such a coward that she can only attack
people from behind the veil of her blog. She doesn’t even permit
comments on her blog."
What
the hell is he blathering on about? What I post on my website is my
own business, and none of Howard Nemaizer's. If he chooses to believe
I am “attacking” people the fool is entitled to his opinion.
Unlike those of Nemaizer's ilk, I have never participated in
the Internet culture of free-for-all, where anything goes, anybody is
welcome to stick their nose into my professional business. I am a
journalist who publishes reports, and my website is not a forum for
the use of all and sundry.
I am not interested in interacting
with the public, nor have any interest in their opinions about my
work. If Howard Nemaizer had taken the trouble to read my notices he
would have seen that “This website is for information purposes
only. The readers may make of it what they will.”
And for
this, he calls me a coward? No, the coward is Howard Nemaizer. He is
a coward because he lies to cover his own wrongdoing, rather than
admit to it and make amends.
"Her
goal was never to talk to me, but attack me and stir a response. She
even refused a letter I wrote her, as if I was this horrible fiend
who took such advantage of her, invading her privacy, yada, yada,
yada. I held back until now, but I have finally be goaded on enough
to speak my peace and put an end to this."
It
was a personal decision for me not to speak to him, with good reason,
not a “goal”. He vastly overestimates his own importance, as far
as I am concerned. I had no intention of engaging him in arguments or
debates about an issue which has always been non-negotiable. I don't
negotiate or argue with liars or gate-crashers.
Just as he
accused me of “stalking” him, he now accuses me of “goading”
him. Nothing could be further from the truth. His arrogant refusal to
remove his false information and fraudulent notices in connection
with my name was an extreme provocation, an act of aggression.
"She
goes out on the attack from behind the isolation of her blog
instead. What does that tell you? BH is happy to invade everyone
else’s privacy without any concern , but you best not invade BH’s
privacy or there will be relentless hell to pay."
What
hypocrisy is this? I made a PUBLIC request, and later, demands,
addressing Howard Nemaizer's PUBLIC offenses. There was never any
“attack”, and I have never once invaded his privacy. To claim that I have also "invaded everyone else's privacy" is as idiotic a statement as he has ever made.
In point of fact, have only
stated the truth and the facts, in my own defense, against his false
accusations.
"If
you truly are a sovereign child of God, Barbara and not a CIA
disinformation agent, do what Jesus would do. Turn the other cheek as
I am going to do–and get on with your life."
Unbelievable.
Can he possibly be serious? He now invokes the name of Jesus Christ,
in his phony attempts to appear holier-than-thou. Get behind me,
Satan! And take your lies from the pit of hell with you.
"Leave
me out of it. But I know you won’t. You can’t. There is a gnawing
pathology in your bearing of false witness, cutting and pasting
pieces to support your agenda while omitting pieces that dispel it.
You and I both know the truth."
Now,
the fool tries his hand at amateur psychoanalysis. What could
possibly qualify him to make such a statement? His ignorance is as
boundless as his aggression. Fueled by pure spite, his vision is
limited only to what serves his negatively inflated ego.
Once
again, Howard Nemaizer is projecting his own psychopathology on me.
He is the one –the only one-- bearing false witness. In fact, my
demands for him to leave ME out of his idiotic promotions, and his
refusal to do so, is the whole core of this issue.
As for my
agenda as regards Nemaizer, it has never been anything more than to
get this aggressive gate-crashing sonofabitch OFF MY CASE.
What
Howard Nemaizer has done, all told, is absolutely disgraceful. He has
made a significant contribution to destroying the life of a person
who has never once done anything wrongful to him.
He
ought to be ashamed of himself, but is so lacking in any kind of
discernment, that he adheres to the false philosophy that might makes
right, that the ends justify the means, that forcing his own
standards and beliefs on others will win him what he seeks.
Howard
Nemaizer displays the mentality of a petty tyrant. He holds the false
belief that by continuing his aggression against others, he will
eventually bulldoze his way to the position he seeks. He wants to BE
SOMEBODY IMPORTANT. If he has to steal from others, no problem. If he
has to lie, no problem, it's second nature.
The
false narrative he has fabricated against Barbara Hartwell, as
evidenced by his own words, is one that is likely to repeat itself,
in each case where he feels thwarted in his grandiose ambition, by
any person whose boundaries he tries to cross, and who demands that
he back off, cease and desist, that he mind his own business and
leave others to tend to theirs.
Such
is the pathological nature of aggression, fueled by a negatively
inflated ego. I've seen all too many like him, especially in my work
as a profiler for the U.S. Government.
Howard
Nemaizer exemplifies so much of that which is destructive of the
God-given unalienable rights and liberties of the individual. And yet
he poses as a “patriot”, even claiming he is a
“Constitutionalist”.
May
we forget he was our countryman.
Barbara
Hartwell Percival
March
16, 2016
Barbara
Hartwell Percival
Legal Defense & Research Trust
PO Box
22
Rhinebeck, NY 12572
Barbara Hartwell Vs.
CIA