Friday, December 12, 2014

THE PRICE OF LIBERTY: A Retrospective on Political Persecution in America


"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it....The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State."
 --Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Minister of Propaganda, 1933-1945


"Ken Adachi is a charlatan and a poseur, engaging in malicious libel, while pretending to be knowledgeable and well-informed on the people and subjects on which he expounds. There is no one so contemptible as a government-sponsored shill who struts like a peacock in his vain hypocrisy, bearing false witness and promoting the false witness of his criminal cohorts."

--Barbara Hartwell, from report exposing Ken Adachi


"I'll give you credit for one thing -- you are very good with your campaign propaganda efforts. This is the first and last time that I shall rebut your lies as my time is valuable and I have more important things to do. Ultimately, truth shall triumph. I have always stood on truth. I refuse any further arguments with programmed propaganda idiots like you!"


--Ted Gunderson, FBI Chief/COINTELPRO Kingpin to Barbara Hartwell, from Open Letter published by Ken Adachi on 'Educate-Yourself' (2005)


"In service to the truth I find it necessary to stand in my own defense regarding the allegations you have made in your Open Letter to Barbara Hartwell, dated April 2, 2005 and published on 'Educate-Yourself'. I also find it important, as regards the pursuit of justice for myself and others who have been designated Targets of a criminal conspiracy, to publish this letter as a detailed report which includes factual information regarding several participants in that conspiracy, identified herein.

The best I can do for now is stand up for the truth as I know it, upon information and belief; citing the facts and the evidence to substantiate those facts wherever possible; and ask for God's protection in making my stand, as I have done these many years. Despite the several attempts on my life, so far, this approach has worked well enough for me; but more importantly, I have no doubt that God's justice will prevail, if not in this life, then certainly in God's eternal time. Someday we will all have to stand before God. This holds true for everyone, whether one believes in God or not. As for His grace, I cannot presume to say to whom He will extend that, though I have certainly been the recipient of God's grace enough to know that it continues to be possible for me."


--Barbara Hartwell to Ted Gunderson, from Open Letter to FBI Chief Ted Gunderson: A Public Report on Criminal Conspiracy & Racketeering (2005)


http://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2006/11/open-letter-to-ex-fbi-agent-ted.html


No weapon formed against you shall prosper, and every tongue which rises against you in judgment you shall condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the Lord, and their righteousness is from me,” says the Lord.

Isaiah 54:17


Vindicate me, O Lord,
for I have walked in my integrity,
and I have trusted in the Lord without wavering.
Prove me, O Loard, and try me;
test my heart and mind.
For your steadfast love is before my eyes,
and I walk in faithfulness to you.
 
Psalm 26: 1-3


PART ONE


This series of reports, to be posted in several parts, is written to declare my sorrow and my outrage about how far this nation has fallen from the  principles of Liberty established by its founders.

How many in this nation have forgotten the true meaning of Liberty! They have fallen prey to the agenda of the architects of the New World Order, who would have us believe that in order to be "safe", in order to have "security", we must accept a Nanny State, adopt a system of governance in which our individuality and our most fundamental rights are sacrificed.

God-given, unalienable INDIVIDUAL rights. Whether or not you 'believe' in God, they are yours for the taking. The burning question is, will you exercise them, will you stand up for them? God gave you free will, thus it is your responsibility, and yours alone, through the intent of your heart and mind, and the actions that proceed therefrom, to decide for yourself, in every area of your life.

God-given rights are not a matter of "religion", nor of "politics". Rights are not granted by any human entity, agency, or government. Rights are unalienable, for the simple reason that what the Creator has bestowed, no person, or collective of persons, has the right to mitigate, to regulate, nor take away. God does not bestow "special rights" to any class, ethnic group, gender or age group. Only EQUAL rights, for one and all.
 

Furthermore, the Creator grants rights to the INDIVIDUAL, the flesh and blood man or woman, not to any 'collective' of persons.
 

Should you fail to accept personal responsibility for making your own decisions, you are allowing yourself to be at the mercy of others (be it one person, or a group of persons) who will be all too eager to step in and make those decisions for you.


Silence, or inaction, in the face of any wrongful act is to be interpreted as consent. This paves the way for all manner of wrongs to flourish, for in the end it always results in tyranny, in slavery to the collective, to the state, to the will of men --rather than in service to the will of God.


Will you seek peace and respect the rights of others, will you pursue truth and stand for justice? Or will you, in self-serving disregard of the rights of others, abuse your gifts from the Creator, in the false belief that all is permissible, as long as you attain your own objectives, further your own political agenda, even if it is at the expense of another person's unalienable rights and liberties?

Here are generally accepted legal definitions of "Personhood":

The state or condition of being a person, especially having those qualities that confer distinct individuality.

The condition of being a person who is an individual with inalienable rights.



PUBLIC FIGURE, PRIVATE PERSON: THE INVIOLABILITY OF PERSONHOOD


I love that phrase, "Inviolability of Personhood". 
 
It carries within it the purest essence of everything I believe in, all that I stand for, what I would die fighting to defend. Inviolability of Personhood: According to God's sovereign and immutable laws, I have the right to declare my personal sovereignty as a child of God, I am free to live as I choose, as long as I do not violate the rights of others, on whom God has bestowed equal rights. As long as I respect the privacy, the personal boundaries, the fundamental rights of others, I am living in accordance with God's laws and God's will.

But there are many (alas, far too many) persons who have "decided", according to their own free will, that God's laws are not to be adhered to. No, God's laws are just not good enough, they are inconvenient to the purely subjective, self-serving goals of those persons who foolishly believe they can improve on, or sidestep the natural order of the universe, created and sustained by God Almighty.

Holding fast to the values of the world, they seek first the approval and the society of men, rather than seeking to serve the Kingdom of God. They are the pleasers of men, rather than the servants of God. Worst of all, they believe they have the right to usurp the power of God by infringing on the rights, the privacy, the personal boundaries, of the individual, which they most often claim is for "the common good", for the "good of the collective", or in service to "humanity".

As history has proved, nothing could be further from the truth. Consider what has ultimately resulted from every single communist or fascist regime, in the course of history: Sacrifice of God's truth, of the God-given unalienable rights of the individual, in service to a godless totalitarian state, where those fundamental rights are not only violated, but annihilated.


RESPECTING THE PRIVACY & PERSONAL BOUNDARIES OF THE INDIVIDUAL


Now comes the most fundamental issue I can ever address, that being the right of the individual to privacy, and to establish his/her own personal boundaries. Those who truly love Liberty, unfettered by the contrived dictates and regulations of human beings, will understand that individual rights are the very soul of Liberty. There can be no Liberty where individual rights are sacrificed.


As for those who wish to follow Christ's teaching, to love their neighbors as themselves --no matter what their religion or lack thereof, for it is a universal principle, a moral absolute-- they will first and foremost RESPECT the God-given rights of others, just as they would wish their own rights to be respected. For you cannot truly love those whose inviolability of personhood you fail to respect.


When I reflect on all the troubles, all the sorrows, all the disasters and near-disasters which have manifested in my life, the cause is nearly always the same: Persons (individually or collectively) who simply refused to respect my
fundamental rights, most notably my right to privacy and my right to determine my own personal boundaries, the Inviolability of my Personhood.

These assaults on my personhood have been perpetrated not only by the government and their minions, but by garden variety busybodies, for more years than I care to remember, and I have had more than enough to last from here to eternity. Enough, already!

This report, for the purposes of defending and celebrating my God-given rights (for I will never give them up), and of setting the record straight with the truth and the facts, is very personal indeed --outlining in detail how my privacy has been invaded and how my personal boundaries have been violated, most notably in cases where the violators claim to be believers in, and defenders of Liberty, of human rights, and of the Constitutional protections of those rights. Some even claim to be "freedom fighters". There is hypocrisy afoot, and as you read on you will hear all about it --in spades.


But let me begin with some general thoughts on what privacy, as an integral part of my Liberty, means to me. Privacy means that my home (no matter how humble) is a place where I can be at peace, whenever I choose. A place that is my sanctuary, where no one can intrude, where I can shut out the world, where I can lock the door against those who would invade my space, but where I can invite friends, when I so choose, to share it with me.


Privacy means that I can have an unlisted street address so that no one can locate me unless I wish to be located. Privacy means I can have an unlisted telephone number, so that I can be free of unwanted, unsolicited calls, or harassing calls, so I can have quiet enjoyment of my home. Privacy means I can choose to have an e-mail address which is not disclosed to the public, so that I can be free from unsolicited communications, and from e-mail harassment/cyber-stalking.

Privacy means that I can be free of unwanted attention and scrutiny, from snoops and busybodies, or from the government (which these days consists entirely of same, having been turned into a tyrannical surveillance state). It means that any information about my personal life that I do not wish to be for public fare, will remain just that --private. Such information may include issues related to my health, my finances, my personal and family relationships or professional associations, my personal/professional background, and any and all other information which it is my right to protect.

As for my personal boundaries? My personal boundaries are delineated by me, and only by me. I have the right to say, Halt right there!, to post a NO TRESPASSING sign, to draw my line in the sand, and forbid anyone to cross it.

To be crystal clear: My life is NOT an open book, for any and all, all and sundry, to peruse. And for anyone who thinks he/she can intrude upon my private life, or cross my line, there will be consequences, such depending on the severity of the offense. At the very least, they will be exposed as wrongdoers, for all the world to see.

But there is another issue which needs to be addressed, that being that, having a public website (since 2000), and having established a presence on the Internet (since 1995) as a journalist & government whistleblower, I would be considered a 'public figure', or more specifically, a 'limited purpose public figure'.


Definition of a "Public Figure":


n. in the law of defamation (libel and slander), a personage of great public interest or familiarity like a government official, politician, celebrity, business leader, movie star or sports hero. Incorrect harmful statements published about a public figure cannot be the basis of a lawsuit for defamation unless there is proof that the writer or publisher intentionally defamed the person with malice (hate).


Definition of a "Limited Purpose Public Figure":


n. a person who voluntarily and prominently participates in a public controversy for the purpose of influencing its outcome and who is thus required as a public figure to prove actual malice in a defamation suit.


http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Libel+and+Slander


Collectively known as defamation, libel and slander are civil wrongs that harm a reputation; decrease respect, regard, or confidence; or induce disparaging, hostile, or disagreeable opinions or feelings against an individual or entity. The injury to one's good name or reputation is affected through written or spoken words or visual images. The laws governing these torts are identical.


To recover in a libel or slander suit, the plaintiff must show evidence of four elements: that the defendant conveyed a defamatory message; that the material was published, meaning that it was conveyed to someone other than the plaintiff; that the plaintiff could be identified as the person referred to in the defamatory material; and that the plaintiff suffered some injury to his or her reputation as a result of the communication.
 

To prove that the material was defamatory, the plaintiff must show that at least one other person who saw or heard it understood it as having defamatory meaning. It is necessary to show not that all who heard or read the statement understood it to be defamatory, but only that one person other than the plaintiff did so. 

Therefore, even if the defendant contends that the communication was a joke, if one person other than the plaintiff took it seriously, the communication is considered defamatory.

Defamatory matter is published when it is communicated to someone other than the plaintiff. This can be done in several different ways. The defendant might loudly accuse the plaintiff of something in a public place where others are present, or make defamatory statements about the plaintiff in a newsletter or an on-line bulletin board. The defamation need not be printed or distributed. However, if the defendant does not intend it to be conveyed to anyone other than the plaintiff, and conveys it in a manner that ordinarily would prevent others from seeing or hearing it, the requirement of publication has not been satisfied even if a third party inadvertently overhears or witnesses the communication. Liability for republication of a defamatory statement is the same as for original publication, provided that the defendant had knowledge of the contents of the statement. Thus, newspapers, magazines, and broadcasters are liable for republication of libel or slander because they have editorial control over their communications.


Just because I may be deemed a 'public figure', does not allow anyone the right to invade my privacy, or have a field day with vicious libel and slander, disseminating outrageous lies. Plaintiffs (including public figures) have been awarded large sums when they have established that damages resulted from the defendants' malicious actions, including extreme emotional distress, pain and suffering, loss of income, etc.

These damages –and far worse-- have been a direct result of the offensive waged against me by the government and their minions. Because I lack the resources and material support, it has not been possible for me to file lawsuits against the perpetrators of these offenses, both civil and criminal. After all, as I have learned the hard way, “justice” is for sale to the highest bidder.

I don't expect I will ever recover from the massive damages, nor be made whole, not in this world. The one thing I can do is continue to shout from the rooftops, to expose the truth, and in the end make certain I have left a well-documented public record, so that I may be vindicated. There is always the hope that outrage may be generated, even if only in a small segment of the population who truly love Liberty (sometimes that's all it takes), so that others may be spared the grievous injustices I and my fellow government whistleblowers have endured.


"JOURNALISM" ON THE WORLD WIDE WEB


In today's world of Internet communications and publications (chat rooms, message boards, and 'social media'), the true professional journalism of bygone days has nearly vanished. In place of such, there are many millions of pages of Facebook, Twitter, Linked In, etc.

Many of these people call themselves "bloggers" (as well they might, for they certainly are not journalists, by any stretch of the imagination); and as such, rather than write well-researched articles or reports, throw together a sloppy piece of work; some don't even bother to use capital letters for proper names, for the personal pronoun "I", or at the beginning of a sentence.


As for their "sources"? Forget credible sources. Mostly nothing more than subjective speculation, and parroting the "news", rumors or gossip they read somewhere, from another "blogger". Most of them, cowards that they are, use pseudonyms or "screen names", and thus cannot be identified. 'Anonymous' equals ZERO credibility.


Then, there is the army of hirelings, paid by political hacks, corporate administrators and intelligence agents, to flood the Internet with propaganda, for whatever is the agenda du jour. These hirelings will invade messsage boards, social networks and the 'comments' sections of websites, where they plaster their messages of falsehood and defamation, each using multiple screen names to make it seem as if there are far more of them than there actually are.

This Internet culture is a milieu in which I have never participated, for it offends all my ethical and aesthetic sensibilities. The jargon alone is enough to make me want to scream in protest of its stupidity! I do not join social networks. I do not join discussion groups, nor post any material on them. I do not post on the "comments" section of any website. I have always used my real name when posting material on the Internet, and unlike many others, never any pseudonym or alias. I stand by what I write, because I care about the truth for the record, and it is not my concern "what people think" about it.


However, I do become righteously outraged when my good name is defamed, which it has been, more times than I could ever hope to count. And this, in most cases by people who do not know me, nor anything about me, but are simply parroting the idiocy they have read/heard elsewhere on the Internet.


Then there are the identity thieves, criminal scum like Todd Brendan Fahey, who (along with cyber-stalking and libel galore) engage in forgery, stealing and exploiting my name, posting bogus reports, forged e-mails and engaging in monstrous invasions of privacy by issuing fraudulent "appeals" for donations, posting my UNLISTED, PRIVATE street address, accompanied by photos of my home.


Hear ye, hear ye, come one and all, Barbara Hartwell is "accepting donations" at her private residence! Which resulted in felony theft on my property, as well as vandalism and harassment by local yokel lowlifes, like-minded criminals who, having been solicited by the likes of Fahey and his 'other half' of the demonic duo, predicate felon Timothy Patrick White, took the opportunity to wreak some havoc, just for the hell of it.


BACKGROUND INFORMATION


As a government whistleblower, I have published my work on the Internet since 1995. I got out of CIA operations in January 1994, before which time I had been working (both "inside" and outside) as a professional journalist, in print and electronic media. I have continued my work as a journalist to the present day.


During the 1980s & 90s I hosted/produced radio and TV talk shows, while living in Greenwich, CT. (CIA paid for my training in radio/TV production and as on-camera "talent" and sponsored my shows, through cut outs.)


I wrote articles for hardcopy publications (there weren't any other kind back then). I was a press representative for Amnesty International, and for several organizations (advocacy groups) for human rights, animal rights, etc. These were causes I believed in (and still do), so if anyone falsely claims I was somehow coerced or "mind-controlled" by CIA into supporting these causes, they would be dead wrong.


I wrote research papers (and served as a lecturer) on various subjects, including metaphysics/paranormal phenomena, Jungian analysis, transpersonal/depth psychology, Christian practice and ethics, advocacy for animals, and political topics. I wrote editorials for newspapers and magazines. However, no matter the topics and issues I addressed, my primary focus has always been on the God-given Rights of the Individual.

My training and formal education have been, generally speaking, in the areas of classical fine arts, psychotherapy and religion. I am trained as a Jungian analyst, and was ordained a Christian minister in 1979, by the Universalist Church (from which I have long since severed all connections), specializing in pastoral counseling. I have continued as a Christian minister, preaching the Gospel of Jesus Christ.


I worked for many years in the private practice of professional counseling, as well as a personnel consultant/counselor for corporations, including Smith Barney, Reuters International (and others I am not at liberty to name), though I gave up that practice shortly after I left CIA operations. (You may draw your own conclusions.)


I have worked with attorneys (corporate, defense, and D.A.s' offices) as a special consultant, as well as with police departments in similar capacity. My objective was always the same: put the bad guys out of business, exonerate the innocent/falsely accused, and one way or another, see justice done.


While inside CIA, I specialized as a profiler (otherwise known as "behavioral analysis"), including of foreign and domestic government officials and other “persons of interest”, and in debriefing intelligence and military personnel, in domestic and foreign covert operations, though I was utilized in other areas, and most significantly, as regards my work as a whistleblower, developed an expertise in counterintelligence operations.


In summary, I know exactly what I am talking about when I address the aforementioned issues. There is no speculation involved. My reports are based on facts, and supported by evidence. I provide names and dates wherever possible. And I don't write about subjects on which I am not knowledgeable (there are plenty of those, as well), but stick to what I do know.


I provide this information as background which will give the necessary context for this series of reports.


MONSTROUS INVASIONS OF PRIVACY BY GOVERNMENT-SPONSORED BUSYBODIES/STALKERS


When a person decides to become a government whistleblower, it is certain that trouble will follow. Usually, all hell breaks loose. This has held true throughout the course of history. A person of conscience, having witnessed and/or been victimized by corruption, high crimes & misdemeanors, malfeasance, skullduggery, which have become not only rampant, but institutionalized, makes a decision that enough is enough. I will not be a part of this. I will not go along with this. I will take a stand against this. Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!


The government agencies perpetrating the crimes against humanity have a 'remedy' for dealing with whistleblowers. It is not a legal remedy, far from it. It is called a neutralization campaign. Which means that they intend to destroy the life of the whistleblower, piece by piece, by any and all means available to them. And considering the vast resources at their disposal, they have unlimited means by which to accomplish their egregious objectives.


These counterintelligence operations are directed by experts, specialists, professionals within the intelligence community. But most of the lowly dirty work of the actual operations is carried out by ambitious amateurs, most notably criminals who stand to gain a pardon, a get-out-of-jail-free card, or a deal that they will not be apprehended or prosecuted for past crimes, and will be protected against the consequences of continuing criminal activities.


Thus they operate with impunity, enjoying their crime sprees of wreaking havoc in the lives of designated Targets. This makes them feel oh-so-important, almost like a bona fide G-Man, the idol they hold aloft and worship, in their ignorance and stupidity. These enemies of Liberty can gleefully live out their control-freak fantasies, fuel their delusions of grandeur, all the while staying out of jail! (Nice work for a sociopath, if you can get it.)


The late Ted L. Gunderson (FBI Chief, COINTELPRO Kingpin), who served in the FBI from 1951-1979, was a primary director of such operations against whistleblowers, journalists and political activists/dissidents beginning in the second half of the twentieth century, and until his death in 2011. As just one example, Gunderson targeted the Black Panthers, resulting in murder and mayhem, using divide-and-conquer tactics, such as forged letters, incendiary in nature, which turned members of the party against one another.

Dr. Martin Luther King, another Target of the FBI's COINTELPRO, was persecuted in a similar vein, harassed with letters urging him to commit suicide. The same tactic, used against former FBI Agent Geral Sosbee, after his forced resignation (1978), continues to this very day, as the FBI works round the clock in attempts to neutralize him, to stop him from reporting the ongoing atrocities of a government run amok in persecuting its own citizens.

If you are a regular reader of this site, you will have heard quite a bit about Ted Gunderson. You will also have heard about his entourage of lackeys, minions and stooges --the above mentioned amateurs, the fed snitches who are instrumental in destroying the lives of decent, legitimate persons who defend Liberty and God-given unalienable rights.


KEN ADACHI & 'EDUCATE YOURSELF': CONTROLLED OPPOSITION, HOAXES & OUTRAGEOUS DISINFORMATION


Most notorious among these criminal perpetrators of large-scale libel/slander campaigns against government whistleblowers is one Ken Adachi aka Peter Boudreau, a government shill who runs a website called 'Educate-Yourself' (a flagrant misnomer, if ever there was one), and who specializes in promoting disinformation about government operations, current events (including loony conspiracy theories and outrageous hoaxes), and black propaganda against Targets. Adachi has been running a massive libel/slander campaign against Barbara Hartwell since 2001.

Among Adachi's "sources" for the defamatory material published on his site are his fellow criminal perps, all serving the cause of perpetuating government corruption and agenda politics, always at the expense of law-abiding Americans.


Here is an excerpt from one of my many reports exposing Gunderson's stable of COINTELPRO minions:


Ted's entourage of toadies and PR shills, such as government stooge Ken Adachi; predicate felon, transvestite, child porno collector and psychotic stalker, Tim White; and psychotic law-enforcement and intelligence groupie/stalker, Brenda Negri, have been promoting Gunderson's outrageous lies (as well as lies fabricated by themselves) about his Targets for years; in addition to vociferously "defending Ted". In fact, Adachi has created a section of his website, 'Educate-Yourself', with that very title.

Adachi's job description, as Ted Gunderson's primary PR shill and factotum, is to DEFEND TED, no matter what kind of truth comes down the pike, no matter the expositor of that truth. As a function of Adachi's "defense" he must also demonize anyone who tells the truth, by promoting outrageous lies about people he does not know, including Barbara Hartwell.


Now, for just one example of such character assassination against Barbara Hartwell. The lying gutter trash who have been involved in the fabrication, the publication and distribution of this particular pseudo report are too numerous to mention. However, three individuals are most culpable: Brenda Negri (the liar who fabricated the pseudo report under the alias 'James L. Choron'); Timothy Patrick White (the liar who distributed the pseudo report, posting it on message boards all over the World Wide Web, and e-mailing it to hundreds of individuals, who in turn forwarded it to others, including furnishing it to Ken Adachi); Ken Adachi (the liar who ensconced the pseudo report in a permanent place among all the other libelous trash about Barbara Hartwell, which he has been both fabricating and posting on his website (and elsewhere) since 2001.

Excerpts from “Barbara Hartwell, Stew Webb, Al Martin ALL CONNECTED”
 
by 'James L. Choron' [aka Brenda Negri]


"Hartwell, as well as Webb, uses the ruse of filing lawsuits as threats to silence those who would expose her connections to Wackenhut and black ops rogue intelligence factions connected to child porn and drug smuggling, illegal arms trafficking, and terrorism.

"We all know who and what Babs is. No need to elaborate."

"As with the case of Webb, her cases either never surface, or get thrown out of court on charges of lack of proof. Her lawyer resides in the same complex as a Wackenhut agency.
Hartwell, in her late 50's and aging, perpetuates her myth by posing provacatively on her website in an aged photo taken when she was much younger."


In case anyone doubts the level of damage caused by Adachi and his accomplices, this piece of filth takes "defamation" into another dimension! There was a period of several years when it actually came up in a Google search in the subject lines related to "Barbara Hartwell", despite the fact that every last word of it is not only defamatory, but entirely FALSE.


The above fabrications have been thoroughly refuted in my reports exposing these criminals. But once again, for the record:


FALSE: I, Barbara Hartwell, have never, at any time, filed any such lawsuits as described here. As for Stew Webb, I happen to know that he has filed several lawsuits, in some of which he used my name as one of the plaintiffs, but without my foreknowledge or permission. Webb added other names to the list as well, of mutual acquaintances (including former miliary/law enforcement/intelligence), who like myself, were very displeased about not being consulted beforehand.


FALSE: I have no "connections" whatsoever to Wackenhut, nor have ever had any such connections. Brenda Negri concocted a story about a lawyer, who happened to be a personal friend of mine, but never my attorney. Negri falsely claimed that this attorney lived and practiced in Florida, whereas my friend lived and practiced in New York City. The attorney named by Negri had no "connections" whatsoever to Wackenhut. (However, she did stand up in my defense, refuted the falsehoods and exposed Brenda Negri as a malicious liar.)


Now, for this gem:


"Hartwell, in her late 50's and aging, perpetuates her myth by posing provacatively on her website in an aged photo taken when she was much younger."


FALSE: In fact, at the time of the publication of this defamatory pseudo report (2002) I was 51 years old, NOT in my "late fifties". The earliest photo posted on my website was taken in 1997, from an article in Hudson Valley Magazine, at which time I was 46 years old, only 4 years younger.



















 
 
 
 
Barbara Hartwell, age 46
Hudson Valley Magazine (1997)


Furthermore, there are no photos anywhere (much less on my website), nor have ever been, of me "posing provocatively". 
 
This is just one of many examples of the malicious, sleazy (and ludicrous) lies concocted by those of Negri's ilk. And for the record, there has never been any “myth” connected to me, except perhaps in Brenda Negri's twisted fantasies.

And by far the most outrageous of all the lies:

“her connections to Wackenhut and black ops rogue intelligence factions connected to child porn and drug smuggling, illegal arms trafficking, and terrorism..." 


FALSE: How dare you, you contemptible mass of pond scum! What "connections"? I have never, in all my life (while inside CIA, before or afterwards) been involved in any way, shape or form, in any such utterly loathsome activities.


However, certain of Negri's accomplices have been heavily involved in precisely these criminal offenses. Tim White, for example, made a deal with corrupt feds (2001) to reduce his prison sentence (convicted of drug trafficking), from 5 years, to 4 months.

What offense was White never even charged with? Possession of child pornography, a felony crime. The feds let that one slide, as long as White continued his campaign of harassing, stalking and threatening Targets with bodily harm or death. Tim White has been thoroughly exposed as a Public Menace, with a list of Targets a mile long. There's some terrorism for you!

And as we speak, though many of his Targets have filed criminal complaints against him to the police, FBI, Sheriff's Dept. in several states from coast to coast in this nation (and also in Canada, where the little coward, White, fled to avoid prosecution) unbelievably, he's still on the loose...

Great job, "law enforcement"!

Now, so that there can be no doubt about Ken Adachi's “sources”, here is the truth about Brenda Negri aka "James L. Choron" aka "Ranger Rick" aka "Ace G-Man" aka etc. & so on and so forth, intelligence/law enforcement groupie & G-Man wannabe.

The following commentary is from Letters to the Editor of a California newspaper. Note that here Brenda Negri uses her real name. Also note that she lies outrageously about her background. My comments follow.


DEAR EDITOR:

I resigned from the TSA in May. I was a Lead Passenger Screener at LAX (Los Angeles). I have a background in investigation and intelligence work, which immediately made me a threat to the incompetent TSA LAX management, most of whom had come over from either the airlines, through nepotism, cronyism, or the former private company — the same one who used to hire kids off of the California State parolee programs.

I resigned after making protected disclosures to the U.S. Office of Special Counsel, Congress, Senate, the FBI, the IRS CID, DOT IG, DHS IG, the media, and others about ea myriad of incidents, documented security breaches and violations of TSA policy and regulations. I was able to get the TSA Internal Affairs to come in for all it was worth; days after they left, we had another huge evacuation thanks to a backpack full of fireworks getting through the same Terminal 7 checkpoints that the IA supposedly had just paid a visit to. Until the TSA becomes accountable, you are very right, we are in for the same stuff. All over again.

Brenda M. Negri
San Pedro Calif.


FACT: Brenda Negri did not "resign" from TSA. 
 
She was terminated for cause: Lying on her application, failing to provide truthful info on her criminal record; and the fact that Negri had been admitted to a mental hospital when her family became concerned about her serious psychopathic behavior, including delusions and paranoid fantasies.
 
Another reason that Negri's employment was terminated: It was exposed (by Barbara Hartwell and others, who had furnished TSA administrators with documents) that Negri was impersonating federal agents; and using the TSA computers to write/post libelous "reports" on legitimate individuals, including Barbara Hartwell; and to harass these same individuals by e-mail.

The criminal harassment included death threats, made by telephone and/or posted on public message boards. The persons threatened included former CIA Barbara Hartwell, former ONI Al Martin, Stew Webb, and former LAPD/miliary vet, Ed Schooling. What a coincidence. All of the people threatened were those who exposed Brenda Negri and Tim White as criminal perps, three of whom were named (Webb, Martin and Hartwell) in Negri's outrageous smear piece-- the same smear piece which Ken Adachi has exploited ad nauseum to destroy the reputation of Barbara Hartwell.

Negri (hiding behind the name "Ranger Rick") was also claiming to be a "mole" (a federal agent) inside TSA, and was actually posting these lies all over the Internet, claiming she was "exposing" TSA.

FACT: Brenda Negri has absolutely NO "background in intelligence work"; and NO "background in law enforcement", as she claims. NONE. This is a bald-faced lie, one that she promoted until she was exposed as a liar and psychopath by Barbara Hartwell and others, in 2001.

Even after she was thoroughly exposed, Negri continued posting outrageous lies under several aliases, including "Ranger Rick" and "the blond spook" (Negri is no spook, except in her fantasies, and “blond” only via a trashy bleach job), and she then started making false claims about her background under her real name, Brenda Negri.

Brenda Negri's REAL background? An uneducated secretary who in fact admitted to Barbara Hartwell in 2001 that she was posing as a male FBI agent ("Ranger Rick" aka Richard Wade, a stolen identity ), and had fabricated false credentials and bona fides because she knew that nobody would believe her "reports" if they knew she was "just a nobody", and a "civilian woman."

A nobody. On that I can certainly agree...and a total whackjob, to boot!

For reports exposing Brenda Negri see:
 
Honey Trap Trickster? Or CIA Assassin?



Irrefutable Evidence: The Truth About Brenda Negri



Negri's lies, threats, and criminal harassment of Barbara Hartwell are fueled by spite and envy, plain and simple. Negri is nothing more than an intelligence/law enforcement groupie, a G-Man wannabe with an axe to grind --just like so many of her accomplices, most notably Tim White and Todd Brendan Fahey, the demonic duo, who have been in collusion to libel, stalk, threaten and harass Barbara Hartwell since 2004, only three years after White and Negri began their harassment in 2001.


This malicious pathological liar, Brenda Negri, has stirred up more trouble with her outrageous lies than I can possibly express. She (and her lies) have also been widely promoted by her accomplices and fellow demonic liars. And perhaps worst of all, these lies from the Pit of Hell have continued to be promoted and disseminated, through libel, slander and malicious gossip, among many, many individuals in the so-called "alternative" media.

But, believe it or not, Old Brenda is still out there, still maniacally obsessed (just like Ken Adachi, Todd Fahey and Tim White) with destroying Barbara Hartwell.

Late last year (2013), Negri sent a harassing e-mail message to former FBI agent Geral Sosbee, taunting him about his so-called "former friend", Barbara Hartwell. I have never been a "former friend" of Geral Sosbee, and can
guarantee, never will be. He's the guy I would trust with my life, the person of choice I would want watching my back in a foxhole.

In fact, Brenda Negri had started harassing Geral Sosbee as early as 2001, sending "warnings" by e-mail against Barbara Hartwell, accusing me of being a "rogue CIA operative", a "black ops goon", a "honey trap" and other absurd, defamatory epithets.

Geral ignored her and dismissed her as a "half-wit". But that did not stop Negri. She then started publishing libelous falsehoods about Geral, in connection with my name. Just like her pals, Tim White, who also harassed Geral by e-mail and telephone, and Todd Brendan Fahey, who harassed Geral by e-mail, as well as posting pornographic filth in connection with my name (hiding behind numerous idiotic screen names) on Geral's message board. The only way to stop this lunatic, Fahey, was to shut down the message board.)

Brenda Negri, calling herself "Ranger Rick", and "Ace G-Man", has been featured on Adachi's website for years, as have Tim White, Todd Fahey and other criminal accomplices. Emblematic of Adachi's sheer idiocy, he has actually hailed Brenda Negri as a "whistleblower".


Just a few samples of Negri's lunacy:


"Tim White cuts loose with the names, Larry Lawson tells Hartwell to go to hell and burn, and the shakedown begins...as black ops goons panic...muster the troops...and try to fend us off...to little avail..."

"Meanwhile, US? Still moled inside the DHS...spooking on and ratting out the cretin who are up to no good..."

Here, Negri claims to be a "mole" and "spook". Instead of naming TSA, where she actually works as a lowly baggage screener at LAX Airport, she cites the Department of Homeland Security, which sounds more IMPORTANT and OFFICIAL, under the delusion that she could actually impress people with her 'credentials'. 

The irony and the unmitigated stupidity of Negri's approach is that NOBODY actually working "undercover" would brag about it on a public message board!

Note that Negri always uses the plural personal pronouns "we" and "us". She does this in every commentary she writes. Perhaps in addition to her other forms of psychopathology, Negri has multiple personality disorder? She uses many aliases; often appears to be talking to herself; and never uses her real name. But the silly and peculiar writing style, as well as the same malicious lies about her Targets, give her away every time.

Now, we see Brenda Negri laying on the shovels of horse manure, waxing maudlin about reaching her lifelong aspiration of "working for the government." (That alone would be an indicator of insanity!)


Another Threat to National Security



Excerpt:


Grounded: Brenda Negri became an airport screener to serve her country—
 
For Brenda Negri, becoming an airport screener in the months after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks was the culmination of her deeply felt need to serve her country.
 
“It meant so much for me to work for the government,” says Negri, an airport screener at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). “I cried when I got sworn in.” Because many of her family members served in the military, working for a federal law enforcement agency “epitomized the ultimate in terms of professionalism and integrity.”

“I'm answering the call to civic service and doing something to combat terrorism,” says Negri. But without a voice on the job, airport screeners are powerless to improve TSA or public safety. “Now we're propping up a house of cards,” she says. “That's been the hardest thing for me.”


Well, if Negri REALLY wants to "serve her country" and to "combat terrorism"; why in hell doesn't she start by ceasing her OWN CRIMINAL HARASSMENT AND THREATS against legitimate whistleblowers and survivors of government black operations?

Why does she NOT defend the Constitution, instead of working for an agency which by its very nature, ushered in under the treasonous and UNCONSTITUTIONAL Patriot Act, serves NOT the country and its citizens, but ONLY the Powers-that-Be, headed by tyrant George W. Bush.

I can tell you why: Brenda Negri is NOT a patriot, far from it. Brenda Negri is only a pathetic wannabe, a law enforcement and intelligence groupie --desperate for ANY government job that would hire her.

Since she has been rejected by every other government agency she has applied to; since she has no education, no training and clearly a low intelligence quotient coupled with mental instability, she would surely be a liability, instead of an asset.

So, Negri claims she wants to "combat terrorism"?

Negri has called me a "terrorist" on more than one occasion in her public commentaries, "Barbara Hartwell and her Terrorist Connections"....as well as making blatant comments about threats to my life, such as that "Hartwell could be whacked by a Rusky with a silencer". Sounds like a terrorist threat to me.......

Here are Negri's comments, from 'Flynnsghost' [a defunct website run by Negri], about the fact that baggage screeners with criminal records had been allowed to slip through the shoddy security and background checks at TSA.
 
"Hey, so what's a few felons here and there, anyhow? I mean, so they let a bomb go through a checkpoint or part of a gun get on a plane, heeeey! It's LA!

Sheesh....

And the inevitable question arises: Did WE have something to do with this leak? YOU BETTER BELEIVE IT."
 
So now, here is Brenda Negri, ADVOCATING allowing bombs and guns to go through the security checks. Unbelievable!

Not only that, but Negri actually tries to TAKE CREDIT for the "leak"! Again, unbelievable!

Perhaps most unbelievable of all, Negri is one of the VERY individuals who LIED on her application to get the job! LIED about her history of mental illness. LIED about her criminal record and continuing felonious activities. LIED about her employment history.

So, to be crystal clear, as I have shown, this is the typical "source" of information Ken Adachi promotes, supports and features on his website: A pathological liar; a delusional psychopath; a criminal stalker; a sex pervert who harasses any man who crosses her licentious radar screen, as long as he is in a government-issue uniform; a criminal menace who issues public death threats against legitimate government whistleblowers (most notably Barbara Hartwell); a woman who commits fraud by impersonating a federal agent; who fraudulently claims a background in "law enforcement" and "intelligence work", which in fact is nothing more than a pathetic attempt to "be somebody", to seek attention and approval in a world where she is otherwise nothing more than a lowlife loser.

Great job, Adachi! We commend you for your excellent skills as a 'talent scout', providing the finest examples of true patriotism, moral rectitude and unparalleled credibility. You couldn't beat these 'sources' with a stick!

So, let me be very clear: Anyone who promotes, supports, aids and abets, or has any truck whatsoever with Ken Adachi or his loathsome website, 'Educate-Yourself', is not only my enemy, but the enemy of Truth, Liberty and Justice.


In PART TWO of this report I will elaborate further on how Ken Adachi continues to perpetrate fraud, and on some of those who are aiding and abetting him in his civil and criminal offenses. 


FORMER FBI AGENT GERAL SOSBEE TARGETED FOR STALKING BY 'THE BEAST'


Now, from former FBI agent Geral Sosbee, just one example of the Negri-like (or, Negriotic, as I call them) stalkers sicced on him in the library, by agents of the U.S. government.


Sosbee: "In early April, 2014, I reported that the fbi regularly uses Pavlov’s Conditioned Response technique on me as follows:

After I post reports the fbi sends at me the same female operative who has previously assaulted me many times at the library and in my home (by pouring toxic fumes into my residence which resulted in a medical condition requiring antibiotics); on this occasion the woman (a large, horrid, ugly and foul looking beast whom I have previously referenced in many of my reports) walks near me in the library, making sure that I see her. She leaves ten minutes later; that evening I am bombarded all night with increased DEW attacks, causing severe sleep deprivation. As Pavlov noted, "his dogs would begin to salivate whenever he entered the room." Each time this animal shows her repulsive face to me, I can reasonably expect a repeat of the same type of torture described above."

As this horrid stalker persists in her harassment at the library (now ongoing for many months), Geral also sent me this more recent statement at my request, to be included in this report.

"I now live in Brownsville, Texas, and I often use the public library's computers for my reports. The library officials here twice refused (latest on 6/17/2014) to ask the 'beast' to stop unwanted actions directed at me. In one instance, when a library official was near the assaultive conduct toward me by the 'beast', the official seemed to deliberately refuse to observe the conduct that I was trying to document, even as the harassment was occurring a few feet away.

I have the impression that the library does not want to assist me at all. The official stated that if there is a disruption he can ask the patron to stop, or that I can call the police myself.

If I were to call the police, I would be viewed unfavorably for reporting activity that does not appear to be criminal. Besides, as I have documented in parts 19, a, b, c, the police often assist the fbi in sending operatives to assault me in efforts to provoke.

The 24/7 surveillance and DEW attacks, as well as assaults by fbi street thugs is ongoing for over a decade and are at times incapacitating."

See:



Many people express shock or disbelief when hearing of such tactics used by the U.S. Government to destroy the life of the whistleblower. Criminals, lunatics, liars, stalkers, all converging on the Target to wreak havoc, which can barely be imagined by those who have not experienced such an onslaught of insanity.

Part of the problem is 'plausible deniability'. The criminal stalkers will not be apprehended because they are hirelings of the intelligence operatives running the neutralization campaign. Thus the harassment continues, often for years on end, while the Target has no legal remedy available and no way to gain relief. But then, that's the whole point of the campaign...

Your government hard at work.

Barbara Hartwell Percival
December 12, 2014

To be continued...




 








 
 
 
 
Brenda Negri
Liar, Lunatic, Lowlife
TSA Government Employee (2002)
TERMINATED FOR CAUSE
 

(Would you want this whackjob screening YOUR baggage?)  
 
at