Globalism
by Deception & Hypocrisy
This
second part of the report covers material from previous reports, in
which the misdeeds of several individuals are exposed. I find the
most effective way to make my argument against the left-wing
agitators who operate by deception and hypocrisy is to bring their
own words into the spotlight. They are then easily refuted with
facts, evidence, reason and principle.
But
first, here is my analysis based on some of their typical tactics in
their attempts at gaining influence for their totalitarian agenda.
Use
of rhetoric comprised of noble-sounding (but deceptive) phrases.
Substitute
emotional appeals for a narrative based on facts.
Projection:
Accuse their ideological adversaries of what is actually true of
themselves. Make assumptions based on a false premise that “We are
all alike”, “We all want the same things”, or “We are all on
the same team”.
Group
think and herd mentality: Consensus that “We are all in this
together”, or “We must all agree” in order to achieve “peace”,
“justice”, “freedom”, etc.
Cite
“divisiveness” as the root cause of conflicts, in attempts to
reconcile irreconcilable differences, justify the unjustifiable,
defend the indefensible.
Label
any disagreement on issues as an “attack”.
Compromise:
Rather than take a solid position based on immutable principles,
weaken your stand, tainting it with incompatible ideologies.
“Peace”
at any price, whatever the sacrifice (justice, integrity, freedom,
truth....)
Substitute
“reconciliation” for justice, no matter how heinous the offense.
Replace
moral absolutes with moral relativism, situational ethics and social
engineering.
Attempt
to negotiate on non-negotiable issues (justice, integrity, freedom,
truth....)
Replace
the unalienable rights of the individual with the “common good”
of the collective.
The
ends justify the means: Nothing is sacred, nothing matters, except
that the desired schemes are implemented.
Replace
equal rights for one and all with “special rights” of any of a
number of designated groups.
Force
“legislation” of morality, rather than allow the rule of law to
prevail against actual criminals.
Cherry
pick the Constitution to support certain of their views, while
disregarding what does not serve their agenda.
Promote/support
anyone, especially public figures, who are also advocates of the UN,
globalism, regardless of their lack of honesty, integrity, or their
detestable track record of abuses of power, human rights violations,
criminality. “He's no angel, BUT...(fill in the blank with some
rhetoric which supports their position), or, “Nobody's perfect”,
BUT (more nonsensical rhetoric...)
The
“sob sister” mentality: Manipulation by engendering guilt,
wherever possible. It's “for the children”, “for the elderly”,
“for the disabled”, “for the disenfranchised”, “for the
poor”.
Use
“opposites” to label their opponents (defenders of Liberty,
unalienable rights of the individual). Label them “haters”,
accuse them of malice, animus, whenever they protest against
injustices or unconscionable actions of those who would steal their
liberty, their property or insult their honor.
Demonize
their opponents with false accusations, charges. Attribute false
motives to any who oppose them.
Smugly
claim the moral high ground against all who expose them or stand up
against them, no matter the issue, or how well-proven by facts,
evidence or principles by their opponents.
Pragmatism
vs. Principle: Negate principles in favor of “pragmatic”
solutions. No matter how unjust, how wrongful.
Use
flattery to insinuate themselves into the good graces of those they
can use for their own self-serving ends.
Seek
publicity anywhere they can find it, form alliances with anyone who
will have them, indiscriminately, and then exploit the credentials,
the influence of others, as means and opportunity permit. These
left-wing agitators are extremely aggressive and ambitious. They are
nothing if not opportunists.
Exploit
the suffering, the misfortunes of others, promote the cases of
legitimate whistleblowers, Targets/Victims of government persecution,
in order to gain “credibility” for themselves, which they then
use to further their own agenda, which has nothing to do with the
actual plight of those they exploit.
I
will begin with a notice posted on a website called FREEDOM FIGHTERS
FOR AMERICA, run by one Chris Zucker.
"I DO NOT HAVE
LIBERAL,GLOBALIST, NEW WORLD ORDER, FRIENDS, IF YOU ARE NOT FOR THE
CONSTITUTION AND FREEDOM, THEN YOU ARE THE TERRORIST ENEMY!!
AND
ID BEING A LIBERAL IS TO RANSACK AND PLUNDER THIS COUNTRY, AND OTHER
LANDS AND HARM IT'S CITIZENS.
THEN
LET WE THE PATRIOTS, BE LIBERAL TO HANG LIBERALS AS
TRAITORS!!!!!!!!!!”
CHRIS
ZUCKER
PRESIDENT
FREEDOM
FIGHTERS FOR AMERICA
How
utterly bizarre. Mr. Zucker promotes left-wing agitator for globalism
and advocate for the UN, Janet Phelan, on his website, and has done
for many years. He has even listed her under the category of “HONEST
HEROS” (misspelled by Zucker.)
I
give this as just one example of a person so misguided that he not
only fails to see the smallest glimmer of truth about the New World
Order, but who has clearly been duped into believing that some of the
very individuals he supports (not only “LIBERALS”, but those who
have the mentality of communists) are his fellow PATRIOTS.
So,
Mr. Zucker wants all LIBERALS to hang! And he and his trusty band of
PATRIOTS will personally lead them to the gallows! That seems a bit
over the top to me, but Zucker is clearly only posturing with
sensationalism to gain attention. Well, he got some, but I doubt it
will help his cause. One can hope not...
Now,
let's take a look at a complaint Mr. Zucker launched against Barbara
Hartwell (2012), which he sent to at least two people, Janet Phelan
and Geral Sosbee.
Geral
immediately forwarded the defamatory message to me, while Janet
Phelan (whom at the time I considered a friend) withheld it.
Chris
Zucker wrote:
"I
am black listed by Ms. Hartwell, i find it humorous considering i
have never had communication with her. At one time i had a blog on
Geral's ning site. A problem broke out when Barbara discovered a link
on my site under mind control. The link was to educate yourself. Keep
in mind when i started the site, I did not know Barbara, Geral, or
you. When Geral told me what the problem was with this link, i
removed it from my site, Yes i have done shows with Heneghan and
Webb.Does that make me a bad person? when some one asks me to do
shows?
I
am insulted to be listed as a bad person, by some one who has no clue
of who i am or what i do. Being quick to put a label on some one is
vicious and un caring. If this is the way she is i am relieved to
have never had any thing to do with her, I am a real government- mob
victim, regardless . And if Ms Hartwell does not recognize real
patriots, perhaps she will one day look through all the hate,and the
terrible things, she, like all of us are going through to find the
real truth.
Chris
Zucker"
Outraged,
I published Zucker's message and refuted his false accusations and
claims. But Janet Phelan took it upon herself to raise objections
that I stood up in my own defense against this aggressive busybody,
Chris Zucker, who had attempted for years to make contact with me
through intermediaries (including Janet Phelan), despite the fact
that I told the intermediaries I had no interest.
I
do not know Chris Zucker, contrary to his claim in his message. Janet
Phelan then continued to discuss me with Chris Zucker (behind my
back), even though she had chosen not to share the message with me.
And more to the point, it was none of Janet Phelan's business how I
chose to deal with her fellow busybody, Chris Zucker.
Then
I was told repeatedly by Janet Phelan that it was “divisiveness”
in which Chris Zucker had been “caught up”, thus negating my
right to defend myself against aggression by the likes of Chris
Zucker.
She
continued to badger me about this issue, also dragging in other third
parties who were completely irrelevant. Leave it to a leftist to stir
up trouble simply because someone dares to exercise her right to free
speech, and to fend off unwanted advances from a gate-crasher.
Geral
Sosbee, however, was outraged, as I was, and had this to say:
“The
following was written against the most noble and inspirational
Freedom Fighter on earth, my best friend and closest ally, the
wonderful Barbara Hartwell.”
Links
to the verbal assaults on Barbara are found at:
freedom
fighters for america dot com
(Chris
Zucker promoting Ken Adachi & “Educate-Yourself”)
From
Geral Sosbee
To:
FREEDOM FIGHTERS
Please remove all of your material from
the site [a NING site owned by Geral], or save it on a disc. You are
not allowed to post here anymore because of your support for a person
[Ken Adachi] who verbally assaulted me on line and who engages
in vicious slander against my friend Barbara Hartwell.
Geral
Sosbee (2012)
So
much for the “freedom fighter”, Chris Zucker.
The
following excerpts are taken from a report (2014).
THE
PRICE OF LIBERTY: Retrospective on Political Persecution in America
http://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-price-of-liberty-retrospective-on_15.html
JANET
PHELAN: LEFT-WING AGITATOR FOR GLOBALIST GOVERNMENT
I'm
aware that this next section may shock some of my regular readers.
Janet Phelan and I had a longstanding professional association and
personal friendship (2005-2012), so it pains me to write this, but as
I have reflected on developing events over the past few years, I find
it necessary to address this issue openly and definitively, primarily
because she was for such a long time a “known associate” of
Barbara Hartwell.
As
always, in all things, it is important to me to set the public record
straight, once and for all. And unfortunately, I have good reason to
believe that misunderstandings have arisen among some of those who
are mutual acquaintance of mine and Janet Phelan's, especially those
in the media. I realize I may lose friends over this, but the way I
see it, those who are true friends will remain friends; others will
fall by the wayside, which is to be expected –I long ago became
accustomed to the loss of friendships for standing up for my
principles.
I
believe it is relevant to say that Janet Phelan, at least during the
time I've known her, has been a far more prolific contributor of
writings on the Internet than I, and no doubt a more “popular”
one. Her work has been more widely published and distributed via
various venues such as discussion groups, social media, and as a
regular columnist on a number of high-traffic, commercial
publications,
and also very active on the Internet radio circuit. As I've heard her
remark in one of her recent broadcasts, she has gathered a large
“following”.
My
work, on the other hand, given that I don't seek publicity, don't
engage in self-promotion, don't join groups, has been mainly limited
to my own website, and a few highly selective others. I also believe
that my writings appeal to a much smaller audience, given my
“straight and narrow”, brutally blunt (considered offensive by
many, I've been told), hard-line focus.
And
then, there is the fact that as a government whistleblower, I have
been targeted for a massive, organized, long-running libel/slander
campaign, with the objective of discrediting my work, while
assassinating my character and defaming my good name. (If you don't
believe this, just put my name into any search engine and see what
comes up. Or, see PART ONE of this report for just a small sample of
the defamatory material.)
Most
importantly, I have reached the point where, being a hard-core,
uncompromising defender of God-given, unalienable INDIVIDUAL rights
and liberties, a position I have steadfastly held for decades, I
cannot afford to be silent about the hypocrisy of those persons who
claim to be "protectors” or “defenders” of human rights;
who complain bitterly about the loss of their own "constitutional
rights", while doing nothing at all to defend those rights. Who
claim to be adhering to "moral absolutes", while actually
practicing moral relativism, social engineering and situational
ethics. Who are operating on a double standard for self-serving,
opportunistic goals, especially involving 'agenda politics', and
specifically advocating left-wing agendas which are designed to
destroy national sovereignty and "regulate" God-given
unalienable rights (which can't be done!), through such godless
communist institutions as the United Nations.
Where,
pray tell, in the U.S. Constitution, does it say that any State of
the Union, or any citizen of the several States, must submit to the
authority or jurisdiction of the U.N.? Nowhere! The U.N. has NO
jurisdiction, NO authority in these united States. Furthermore, no
U.N. “treaties” have any lawful authority if they are
countermanded, or their terms prohibited, by what is written in the
Constitution.
This
Cursed Beast, this Spawn of Satan, the U.N., didn't even exist in
1787, and these usurpers have no business whatsoever encroaching as
much as a micro-millimeter into this Constitutional Republic,
meddling in the affairs of this sovereign nation.
This
Republic was founded as a "government of the people, by the
people and for the people", strictly by the “consent of the
governed." NOT to be ruled by global elitists, secret societies,
international banking cartels, multi-national corporations, or by
invasion of foreign busybodies into the body politic, with their
diabolical scheme of locking down their New World Order, where all
power is centralized in a One World government.
All
genuine patriots who defend the Constitution, and the God-given
unalienable rights protected therein, have been shouting at the top
of their lungs for well over half a century, to get the U.S. the hell
OUT of this bastion of vile communism, New Age secular humanism, and
globalist totalitarianism aka the New World Order. (And I give the
John Birch Society credit where it is due, for leading the charge,
these many years.)
For
those who are unaware of the truly sinister nature of the United
Nations, its alliances with Luciferian/New Age cults (such as Lucis
Trust, formerly “Lucifer” Trust), its flagrant anti-Christian
doctrines and practices, its total disrespect for INDIVIDUAL rights
and PRIVATE property (I could go on...and on....), I can only say
BEWARE.
While
many will continue to buy into the pervasive propaganda that the U.N.
is benign and promotes peace, cooperation and justice, those who want
the truth about the U.N. may easily find it by taking the time to do
your own research. (There is no substitute!) And for those
uninterested in the truth, you will, for declining to take personal
responsibility in seeking truth, and failure to stand in defense of
truth, get exactly what you asked for: slavery under globalist
totalitarianism.
What
here, is the relevance of the U.N.? Janet Phelan regularly has truck
with the U.N., including attending and participating in their
conventions, and supporting and advocating their policies and
"treaties". She writes articles promoting the U.N., in
which she attempts, using obviously deceptive left-wing rhetoric, to
persuade the readers into agreement with their UN-American agenda.
(Pun intended.)
But
at the same time, she can be heard loudly complaining of the U.S.
government's violations of “constitutional rights” and
“unconstitutional” policies. Like many others of this ilk, she
seems to think she can have it both ways. She can't have it both
ways. She can't cherry pick the Constitution to support her leftist
agenda, but seems hell-bent on doing exactly that. More on this later
in this report...
In
2012 I broke off my association with Janet Phelan (to be clear, the
decision was mutual), due to "irreconcilable differences".
Speaking strictly for myself, this decision on my part followed a
pattern of behavior by Janet Phelan, which by my observations and
experience, had become increasingly presumptuous, manipulative, pushy
and intrusive; and which displayed a profound disrespect of my
privacy and personal boundaries; and which ultimately pushed me to
the limits of what I was able and willing to tolerate from a person
who called herself my friend.
But
more than that, she insulted my honor, by accusing me of
"misreporting" events (I did no such thing); of trying to
"rationalize" in connection with events (I did no such
thing); of "attacking" her in a public venue (I did no such
thing), and most of all, by calling me a "faithless friend".
That is a matter of subjective personal judgment, one with which I
vehemently disagree.
I
must say, I will not allow these untruths to stand, but will speak
up, for the public record, in defense of my honor, and of all that I
stand for, all that I have worked for, fought for and sacrificed for,
these many years. After all I have lost (between 2010 and 2013, in an
unprecedented series of disasters, nearly all the personal property I
owned, including my house), after all the massive damages inflicted
on me by the government and their minions, in my battles for Liberty
and Justice --the one thing I have left intact is my honor. And I
will not stand by silently when someone (anyone) attempts to sully my
honor with gratuitous and unwarranted allegations and insults which
comprise a gross misrepresentation of my character –especially if
that person's name has had a longstanding connection to mine in
media, as a “known associate”.
As
any person of spiritual/intellectual discernment should be able to
perceive (whatever you may make of it), this is not solely a
"personal" issue --far from it-- but rather a matter of
principle, and an issue of widely divergent and seriously conflicting
beliefs and standards, and of what it has become clear are
diametrically opposed political ideologies and moral imperatives.
Of
which those of Barbara Hartwell stand uncompromisingly for God-given
unalienable INDIVIDUAL rights and liberties, as protected under the
Constitution.
And
of which those of Janet Phelan would subvert those individual rights
and liberties, and further, dismiss the most fundamental principles
of Liberty on which this nation was founded, in service to the New
World Order/U.N. agenda of collectivism, a consensus-based 'herd'
mentality, and the so-called "common good" (Nanny State) of
globalist totalitarianism.
To
sum it up, my level of "irreconcilable differences" with
Janet Phelan's political ideology? Agitators for this left-wing
agenda will conquer this nation, and trample MY rights, over my dead
body. And as long as I have breath in my body, I will fight for those
rights, against any and all who would attempt to mitigate or
compromise them. Liberty or Death. Don't Tread on Me.
In
short, Janet Phelan, I have come to believe after much reflection on
events, circumstances, and the interactions I have participated in
and/or observed over a period of years, is an agitator for globalist
government. That is my considered professional opinion, for the
public record.
Janet
Phelan wrote:
“The
U.S. Senate yesterday rejected the United Nations Convention on the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Although a majority voted in
favor of ratification of this treaty, the vote fell short of the two
thirds necessary.
The vote -- 61 to 38 -- divided closely on
party lines, with Republicans calling the vote a victory for national
sovereignty and parental rights.
Many Dems, including John
Kerry, disagreed, however.
"It really isn't
controversial," Kerry said. "What this treaty says is very
simple. It just says that you can't discriminate against the
disabled. It says that other countries have to do what we did 22
years ago when we set the example for the world and passed the
Americans with Disabilities Act."
“While
many were calling this a defeat for the internationalists and the
NWO, I must question if this may be a knee-jerk response to a more
complex situation."
"We
have not affirmed our “sovereignty” by rejecting the Convention
on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. We have, in fact, lost
yet another opportunity to affirm our basic humanity."
Not
“really” controversial? What could be more controversial than our
national sovereignty, that which stands between us and subjugation to
globalist totalitarianism. And using a quote from Kerry to bolster
this lame argument, as if he might qualify as paragon of virtue where
defending anyone's unalienable rights are concerned? I won't
elaborate, but anyone may find the truth, the facts and the evidence
about John Kerry by perusing his track record. (Barf bag alert!)
Janet
Phelan's idea of a “knee-jerk response” is mere meaningless
rhetoric, given that she is, as usual, in favor of allowing the U.N.
to encroach ever further into the affairs of this sovereign nation.
Does she even understand the true meaning of sovereignty? What the
abdication of sovereignty would actually mean to every single
American?
And
does she understand that the Constitution would prohibit interference
in the lives of individuals by an outside entity? Evidently not, on
either count. Or, she does understand, but simply dismisses the
facts, as they are inconvenient, and not to her liking. (From my
observations, leftists don't have much use for facts, as they get in
the way of their agenda.)
Furthermore,
using U.N. muscle to force any policy on foreign nations is morally
repugnant, just as are the endless (undeclared) wars of conquest and
aggression against other countries. Countries who have not committed
any acts of war against the U.S. Just one of many reasons why the
U.S. should get the hell out of the U.N.!
And
according to Janet Phelan, the flowery phrase “affirming our basic
humanity” would be in line with allowing this outside entity to
relegate the “rights” of the disabled, as a special category, to
the discretion of the collective, to apportion them as they see fit.
Wrong. These are nothing less than the God-given UNALIENABLE rights
and liberties of the INDIVIDUAL, disabled or not.
Just
as the U.N. is chomping at the bit to “regulate” the right to
keep and bear arms (including in this country!), as enshrined in the
Constitution, which “shall not be infringed”, the most basic
right of all, the right to self-defense!
And
let's not forget Agenda 21, the diabolical plot to steal private
property from its rightful owners, in service to the globalist
collective and its so-called “common good”. Where will it end?
This string of usurpations will never end, not until the final
lockdown of the New World Order. And not unless We the People (those
of us who defend Liberty, that is) stand up and put a stop to it.
There
are no “special rights” given, to any group of persons, in any
category. Not by virtue of gender, ethnic origin, age, religious
creed (or lack thereof), including those who are disabled. There are
only EQUAL RIGHTS, bestowed by the Creator (thus unalienable) on each
and every INDIVIDUAL. Equal individual rights are to be recognized,
and respected, as a moral imperative. Meddling by the U.N. is not to
be tolerated by any true defender of Liberty.
As
for the issue of “humanity”?
The
highest and most true definition of “humanity” toward our fellow
persons is to RESPECT THEIR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS. Which include their
privacy, their personal boundaries (as determined by each one) and
their liberty to live as they see fit, to make their own decisions
about their own lives.
HOWARD NEMAIZER AKA NEMA: A TOTAL FRAUD
The
following section of the report exposes yet another busybody, an
extremely aggressive and ambitious amateur named Howard Nemaizer
(using the pseudonym Howard Nema), who also promotes Janet Phelan and
has described her as a “good friend”.
Howard
Nemaizer, since the writing of this report (2014) has joined the
massive libel campaign against Barbara Hartwell, promoting the most
outrageous lies.
Nemaizer has exploited my name, in attempts to make
a name for himself, as well as misrepresenting my name and website by
promotions of false information, and linking my name to those (such
as Janet Phelan and Harry Link) I have publicly denounced, for cause.
He has also made fraudulent promotions of my name in connection with
psychopaths and criminals, including an arsonist named Keith Mutch,
owner of a radio station where demonic icons are used to promote
heavy-metal devil-worship.
LEFTIST
RHETORIC ON TRUTH TALK NEWS
Howard
Nema has notices posted on his websites stating that he wants to
restore constitutional government. Banners proclaiming: GET US OUT OF
THE U.N.!
Why
then does he so often engage in promotion of the flagrant left-wing
ideology spouted by Janet Phelan?
I've
been surprised more than once to see him nodding along while his
guest holds forth, inveighing against the principles of Liberty on
which this nation was founded.
On
one program Janet Phelan spoke about Hugo Chavez, his “leadership”,
how much “good” he had done for “his people”, how he was
loved by them, etc. etc. Never a challenge from Howard, never the
slightest disagreement. (Had there been, no doubt Janet Phelan would
have labeled it an “attack”.)
On
another program, in the same leftist vein, Janet Phelan spoke out
against capitalism, and actually tried (unsuccessfully) to draw a
parallel between capitalism and “attacks on First Amendment
Rights”.
Here,
the link posted by Janet Phelan:
How
capitalism accommodates attacks on 1st Amendment Rights--Impromptu
with Howard Nema
At
one point, in explaining her complaint against capitalism, she makes
the apparent disclaimer, “I'm not a socialist.” Really? Then
what's her point?
Maybe
Hugo Chavez can explain it:
"Capitalism
is the way of the devil and exploitation. If you really want to look
at things through the eyes of Jesus Christ - who I think was the
first socialist - only socialism can really create a genuine
society." (2006)
Hogwash!
Chavez clearly had not the slightest understanding of the Gospel of
Jesus Christ. Jesus was no socialist. Socialism is a system of forced
compliance with the dictates of the state, an odious form of bondage.
Jesus Christ proclaimed Liberty to the captives. Morality, spiritual
discernment, love of God and your neighbor, true Christian charity,
none of these can be legislated, they cannot be contrived, cannot be
forced on a population at the point of a gun. Which, when you're
dealing with leftists, is where it always, always ends up.
And
irony upon irony, Howard Nema titles the program:
THE
RISE OF GLOBAL TOTALITARIANISM
Howard
has a guest whose political ideology supports the very “global
totalitarianism” he claims to be dead set against. And he doesn't
see this?
AGITATING
FOR LEFT-WING MOB RULE: TOTALITARIANISM, THE U.N. & THE NEW WORLD
ORDER
It's
time to wrap up this segment. Just one quick anecdote regarding a
discussion I had with Howard Nema (2013), regarding the nature of the
political ideology espoused by Janet Phelan. As previously stated, I
did not bring up Janet Phelan's name to Howard after I had broken off
my association with her. I had said what I considered necessary, and
had no reason to revisit the issue.
But
one day I was having a discussion with Howard in which I outlined my
strict dedication to the principles of Liberty and God-given
unalienable individual rights. Howard's idea was that “everyone
sees things in a different way”. True, but if the way they “see”
things means that they will violate the unalienable rights of others,
fail to respect the privacy, the personal boundaries of others, or
try to force their viewpoints on others, then no true defender of
Liberty will tolerate such behavior. They may “see” it as they
will, but that right to “see” morphs into wrongdoing when they
fail to respect the rights of others, or take action to trample the
rights of others.
Howard
brought up Janet Phelan, in an apparent attempt to persuade me of the
value of what she had to offer in terms of defending human rights and
related issues. My answer was as follows: You cannot claim to be a
“defender” or “protector” of “rights” if you fail to
acknowledge the ultimate supremacy of the God-given unalienable
rights of the INDIVIDUAL.
Janet
Phelan, by her own admission, and by her many statements advocating
for the U.N. and “left-wing politics” (her own words) is in favor
of compromising, modifying, adulterating the rights of the individual
in service to the dictates of a collective.
And
finally, in terms of a clear overview, I explained my position by
asking Howard to consider this scenario:
One
person (for example, in this case, Janet Phelan) decides that she
will dedicate much time and effort in attempts to influence people
(via her writings, radio appearances, etc.) to believe that left-wing
ideology is not only acceptable, but preferable; that it has merit in
that it contains solutions to various problems; will result in
improving the lives of the citizens of a country, will “affirm our
basic humanity”, and so on and so forth...
As
a result of her efforts, some of the audience she is addressing
(those who lack discernment and don't think for themselves) are
actually influenced to join in and support what she is promoting. And
remember, according to Janet, she already has a “large following”.
(This statement was in fact made on Howard Nema's show.) Her work is
posted on numerous large commercial sites on the Internet, spanning
an entire spectrum from those who profess “conservatism” to those
who are openly leftist, New Age, secular humanist.
(And
remember, Janet Phelan is only one person. How many others are there,
embracing and promoting the same ideology?)
Over
time, more and more people jump on the Leftist Bandwagon, and soon
they themselves are spouting the same ideology, and become agitators,
not only by their words, but now by their actions. (For example, they
get sucked in by the rhetoric, and join the 'Occupy' movement.)
Soon,
as the mob of leftists gains momentum, U.N. Treaties gain
signatories. Legislation that defies the Constitution is passed. A
person's right to keep and
bear
arms is “signed away” by meddlers from the U.N. Now, the
unconstitutional legislation becomes “law”.
What's
next? The U.N. decides that they have the right to invade our
sovereign republic with impunity, for the “common good”, to
“protect human rights”, to “keep the peace”. (After all, the
welcome mat has been rolled out, is ready and waiting for such an
invasion.)
Meanwhile,
the criminals run rampant, because criminals don't respect the law,
nor anyone's unalienable rights (never have, never will) and they
still have guns and ammo, which they will use in assaults against the
citizenry. Robbery, rape, murder, mayhem, all at the point of THEIR
guns.
But
where are YOUR guns and ammo? Nowhere to be found, they've been
confiscated by lawless men (or women) with badges and guns (operating
under the color of law), who are “just following orders”, orders
given by tyrants who themselves are “following orders”, the
directives of even bigger tyrants at the top of the global food
chain.
This
is how totalitarianism is achieved, by recruiting one individual at a
time, then groups of individuals, using propaganda (especially
manipulation by engendering guilt: It's for the children, for the
disenfranchised; for the elderly; for the disabled, etc. etc.),
pressure tactics, and finally, threats.
At
long last, a paramilitary team is standing on your doorstep,
brandishing their weaponry, pointing guns in your face, in your
wife's/husband's face, while your children or grandchildren huddle in
fear in the background.
You
will do what we say, or we will lock you up, or kill you.
How
then, can you possibly stop them?
Hitler
did it, Stalin did it, Chairman Mao did it...and on and on it
goes....
The
objectives of each of these tyrants (and many others throughout the
course of history) were the same: TO STRIP YOU OF YOUR GOD-GIVEN,
UNALIENABLE RIGHTS & LIBERTIES, TO CONTROL EVERY ASPECT OF YOUR
LIFE & DESTINY. And they gained this power because the people, AS
INDIVIDUALS, failed to stand up and stop them.
Totalitarianism,
courtesy of the New World Order.
Don't
be fooled: The promotion and support of even one leftist opens the
door, throws out the welcome mat, for more leftists, and their
godforsaken globalist totalitarianism. And who is to be held
accountable for all this?
Every
single person who is a part of it, every person who encouraged it,
who aided and abetted the mob of leftists (or just one) in any way,
shape or form.
When
I finished my little stump speech, Howard told me, “I never thought
of it that way.” And apparently, he's decided to continue NOT to
think of it that way. That is his prerogative, but at least I know
that I did what I could in service to the truth. I can only offer the
truth to anyone willing to listen, but I won't try to force it on
anyone.
And
with this, I conclude this report.
I
implore all Liberty-loving Patriots, Defenders of Unalienable Rights,
of the Sovereignty of this Constitutional Republic, to take a closer
look, a hard look, at those claiming to be what they so clearly are
not. Only a few are mentioned here, but they are legion.
You
will find their propaganda on numerous high-traffic commercial
websites. You will hear their deceptive rhetoric booming out on the airwaves.
But
what of their actions? Who and what do they actually support?
Who
do they attack with their libelous/slanderous falsehoods?
They
are deceivers and hypocrites, merchants of false hope, masquerading
as patriots, freedom fighters, opponents of the New World Order.
They
are the enemies of Liberty, while claiming to champion it.
Barbara
Hartwell Percival
November
5, 2016