"Barbara Hartwell lives in the same
viper's pit that spawned Stew Webb. For more than a decade, Hartwell has
slandered, libeled, and defamed the good name of Ted Gunderson as egregiously as
Stew Webb has. In fact, they have often posted articles together, complimenting
each other, while slandering Ted with one outrageous lie and another. They both
deserve the public's strongest repudiation and condemnation. They truly are the
lowest of the low."
--Ken Adachi, publisher of
'Educate-Yourself' website (September 22, 2012)
Ken Adachi (aka Peter Boudreau), a
government stooge, liar-for-hire and minion of the late COINTELPRO Kingpin, Ted
L. Gunderson, has been running a massive libel/slander campaign against Barbara
Hartwell for over a dozen years (note his latest libelous falsehoods quoted
above.) In fact, Adachi has dedicated a special section of his website to
libeling Barbara Hartwell, which he calls: "Barbara Hartwell Founder and CEO of
Liars, Inc." Adachi has also carpet-bombed the Internet with his trash, posting
his malicious lies against Hartwell, whenever and wherever the opportunity
arises.
Unfortunately for the Targets of
Adachi's smear campaigns, his website gets a high volume of traffic (of which he
regularly boasts), and the Google Gestapo certainly aids and abets him and his
accomplices by their complicity in featuring Adachi's trash postings among the
top listings, even those which are many years old, at the expense of
the legitimate journalists and government whistleblowers who are Targets of
Adachi's vile attacks.
Contrary to Adachi's claim that I have
been "libeling", "slandering" and "defaming" Ted Gunderson, what I have actually
done is EXPOSE THE TRUTH (along with plenty of evidence) about the
malfeasance, crimes, cover-ups and scams of Ted Gunderson and his cronies; his
unconscionable abuses of power and authority, both while inside the FBI and
after his official retirement, which I had learned from my own experience in my
extensive dealings with Gunderson, first as a personal friend/professional
colleague (1997-2000), and later as an adversary, after I broke off my
association with him, in good conscience, and for good cause.
Furthermore, my
reports are often backed up with evidence from other trustworthy sources,
including former FBI agent/whistleblower Geral Sosbee, who also had firsthand
experience with Gunderson's corruption, while both were still inside the FBI. I
can also guarantee that I knew Ted Gunderson a hell of a lot better than Adachi
ever did.
[See my many reports on this site for a
comprehensive overview of the activities of this criminal cabal, plus many of
the gory details.]
Ken Adachi, at the original and
specific direction of Crime Boss Ted Gunderson, has, for the past dozen
years, simply parroted the many outrageous lies fabricated for the purpose of
discrediting (and ultimately neutralizing) Barbara Hartwell, the primary lie
being that I am a "CIA disinfo agent". And Adachi is still at it, with no end in
sight...
Now, to Adachi's other "sources":
they are invariably scum criminals, pathological liars, porno freaks,
charlatans, and his fellow stooges, most throwbacks in thrall to the Gunderson
Protection Racket, and all with an axe to grind or a hideous agenda to protect
at the expense of legitimate government whistleblowers and journalists who are
expositors of crimes, corruption and coverups. I am only one such Target, but it
seems that according to this crew of loathsome liars (for evidence, just see the
prolific smears on Ken Adachi's site), I am deemed PUBLIC ENEMY NUMBER
ONE.
Adachi also promotes these "sources" in
and of themselves, posting articles they have written, or forwarded to him,
and which have become permanent features archived on his website. It is
important to state that these "sources" hide behind multiple pseudonyms, aliases
and screen names (just as "Adachi" --not his real name-- does), in their abject
cowardice and complete lack of scruples, making it nearly impossible to
effectively file civil or criminal charges against them; in fact, a person could
go bankrupt in attempting even to file a civil lawsuit against these perps; some
persons who have tried were faced with financial ruin.
Among these "sources" are predicate
felon, fed snitch, psycho-stalker, extortionist, Timothy Patrick White;
blackmailer, identity thief, forger, psycho-stalker, Todd Brendan Fahey;
grifter, psycho-stalker, Busybody-from-Hell, Pamela Schuffert, and other
criminal stalkers and psychopaths such as Brenda Negri and Larry Lawson. Others
Adachi promotes include shills, con artists, charlatans and malicious liars,
like Don Nicoloff, Alex Jones, Susan Ford aka Brice Taylor, Alma Ott, Doug
Millar, Rayelan Allan...and on and on in this vein. Then, there are other
government stooges who parrot and post Adachi's voluminous lies, along with
their own idiotic speculation and fabrications, such as Alex Studer (lackey of
A. "True" Ott), James F. Marino and Craig Oxley --and this is only the short
list.
KEN ADACHI &
EDUCATE-YOURSELF: PERMANENT FEATURE PROMOTING WATER AS A WEAPON BY JANET
PHELAN
But there is another issue here, one
that after much deliberation, I find it necessary to
address. Note that Adachi, while running his hideous libel
campaign against Barbara Hartwell, later adding certain of
my associates, including ex-FBI agent Geral Sosbee, Dr. Len Horowitz and Sherri
Kane, (all of whom, "coincidentally" have exposed Ted Gunderson as
COINTELPRO) is strangely enough, promoting Janet Phelan, in a permanent section
as a feature, which has been prominently displayed, front and center page of his
website, since 2007.
SOURCE: Water Supply
Sabotage
From Ken Adachi
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/waterdeliverysabotage19jun07.shtml
June
19, 2007
"Janet Phalen has been trying to get out this
story for over three years. Her first expose on water supply sabotage was titled
"Public Extermination
Project"
(http://la.indymedia.org/news/2004/08/115676.php). Simply stated, cities such as
Los Angeles are installing special valves and extra delivery piping into
residential water supply systems. If you read Janet's first expose story, you
will see how thoroughly the operation is being concealed and held in secrecy
under a hush, hush "Homeland Security" cover. Her more recent story linked below
includes more info and photos not seen in the earlier expose. I do not doubt
the story she is trying to get out. It fits perfectly with the overall
Illuminati depopulation agenda, especially their intent to depopulate
America, the biggest stumbling block to the installation of a One World
government.
You have no idea what Janet has gone through in
the past 3 years and the difficult conditions she has tried to survive through!
That could be a book in and of itself.
I've saw a great deal of roads adjacent to
residential homes being torn up and new water piping being installed all around
Irvine California in 2005 and 2006. Practically every major street throughout
Irvine had new piping installed. Coincidence? I don't think so."
Water as a Weapon by Janet
Phalen May 4, 2007
"You have no idea what Janet has gone through
in the past 3 years and the difficult conditions she has tried to survive
through! That could be a book in and of itself."
Dead wrong, Adachi. I DO have
much more than just an "idea" of what Janet Phelan has gone through, because she
has confided in me, a confidence I never once violated, and never will. What's
more, I have supported her as best I could, including by posting many of her
articles on my website. But how could Ken Adachi possibly know anything about
what Janet Phelan has gone through?, since to my knowledge she has not made most
of it public. That is a question for which I have no
answer.
As to the reasons I am addressing this
issue, I should first explain that a few months ago, a serious disagreement
arose between me and Janet Phelan, one that could not be resolved, at least from
my perspective, speaking strictly for myself.
I have always been aware of certain
differences, at least in political views, between me and Janet. For instance, I
do not acknowledge any authority or jurisdiction of the United Nations. The
UN is NOT a constitutionally lawful entity, and it threatens the sovereignty of
these United States --which is exactly the point of its existence. The UN has
absolutely no business meddling in the affairs of these United States, in any
way, shape or form. Nor would I personally ever traffic with such a
clearly communist, globalist totalitarian entity.
Years back, I had a number of run-ins
with people from the U.N. who tried to sabotage my work, but that is a story for
another time...
When it comes to God-given unalienable
individual rights, as protected and guaranteed under the Constitution, I take
the hard line, with no compromises, always have, always will. And although there
are other issues, basicially along the same lines ("leftist politics", secular
humanism, etc.) on which I have never agreed with Janet's general views, I never
had a problem simply "agreeing to disagree"; that is, as long as my individual
rights, including privacy, and my clearly delineated personal boundaries were
respected.
I don't have to be in total agreement
on every single issue with every person in order to maintain an
association/friendship. If I did, I can guarantee I would have no friends at
all! But I do expect that my friends will respect my fundamental rights, and my
personal boundaries, as determined by me, just as I respect
theirs.
I'll say up front that this
particular disagreement, although it ended a longtime professional association
and friendship between Janet and me, due to what I can only call "irreconcilable
differences", has not changed my view of the general validity of Janet's work,
nor do I hold any animosity against her in my heart, regardless of any and all
disagreements we may have. I wish her well, as I always
will.
However, I cannot just sweep
certain issues under the carpet, especially when they involve what are, to me,
the most important principles on which my work, and my entire life, are based.
For me, certain principles I hold, and certain policies to which I adhere, are
non-negotiable and not subject to compromise.
More on that in a moment, but first
some questions which may arise in the mind of the Reader:
Why would Ken Adachi be promoting Janet
Phelan? Does he not know that (aside from being a longtime
close associate/friend of Barbara Hartwell, who is, according to Adachi, "the
lowest of the low"), that Janet Phelan herself has exposed Ted Gunderson? That
in fact, she has publicly stated that Ted Gunderson attempted to murder
her?
TED GUNDERSON'S NEUTRALIZATION
CAMPAIGN
See:
Targeted for Murder
And:
Ted Gunderson's
Attempted Murder of Journalist Janet Phelan
Excerpt:
“I was in Santa Monica, on the streets, following the police assault on my
person on January 3, 2003. I had made a personal decision that I was not going
to let my external circumstances (homelessness) impact my work. I was hard at
work on the first story about the planned use of water as a weapon against the
citizens of the U.S. The situation surrounding me, the negative attention by the
government which had launched the assault, was beginning to amp up again.
I was in touch with some people in the 911 Truth
movement and someone suggested I contact Refuse and Resist, another activist
group. The guy from R and R told me I needed to make contact with someone named
Ted Gunderson, that he would help me. My life was in danger, Sherri.
I had never heard of Ted Gunderson but I went ahead
and called him. He told me he was ex-FBI, but that he was one of the "good
guys." He said he would come out to Santa Monica and pick me up and bring me to
safety, back to his home in Las Vegas. He told me I was in grave danger.
I was a little nervous about his FBI history and told
him I wanted to check him out. I asked him to wait a day or so until I got back
to him. But within twenty four hours Gunderson was already in Santa Monica,
searching for me.
We met up. I thought that it was probably a bad idea
to go back to Vegas with him. Something told me the guy wasn't right. But I was
very, very curious and I put my trust in God that He would protect me and that I
would learn from this experience.
When we got back to Vegas, to his condo which was on
Royal Circle Drive, if I remember correctly, is when the covert assaults with
chemical weapons began. There are a couple of ways to deploy these weapons, per
my experience. One has to have physical contact with the substance and Gunderson
laced the bucket seat I was sitting on, in his vehicle, with the chemical.
Curiously, the day before this happened, I was
sitting in his study and he gave me some scratch paper to write on. On the back
of the paper was Gunderson's report about another target, and in that report
Gunderson stated that he was aware that the government had chemicals which
induced heart attacks. The other target had been stating that these chemicals
had been used against him. I asked Gunderson at that point what these chemicals
were. He told me he couldn't remember what they were called.
He also laced my sheets with these. At the point of
the second attack I left in great haste. Learning from the enemy is all very
good and well but it had gotten too explicitly dangerous for me to stay there
any longer.”
Read Janet Phelan’s encounter with Ted Gunderson’s
employee, Tim White:
“I was first approached by Tim
White shortly after I began to appear on radio shows, discussing the water as a
weapon project. We spoke on the phone and exchanged emails for a couple of
months. He wanted me to move out to Denver, which was something I was not
interested in doing.
After a couple of months of
contact, I became concerned that something was not quite right with Tim White. I
severed contact with him. It was a bit later on, after I first posted something
on the internet indicating that I had been targeted by Ted Gunderson, who had
lured me to his home in Vegas for nefarious and deadly purposes, that I first
began to be attacked by Tim White."
Now, can anyone actually
believe that Ken Adachi does not know about this report, in which Janet Phelan,
in her own words, exposes Ted Gunderson's attempt to murder
her?
I find it a near
impossibility that such a report has escaped his notice, especially since it was
posted, with Janet's express permission, on two websites, those of Barbara
Hartwell and Sherri Kane, who are also Targets of Adachi's libel campaigns, as
well as Targets of Adachi's longtime accomplice, predicate felon Tim White.
And yet, Janet Phelan,
rather than being attacked by Adachi, for the very same reasons he has attacked
so many others, simply because they have told the truth about their experiences,
exposed the results and evidence of their investigations, in regard to Ted
Gunderson, is actually issuing favorable statements, and appears to be
"sympathizing" with what Janet has "gone through". This, in the face of the
machinations of Ted Gunderson, who has actually ENGINEERED at least some of the
atrocities visited upon her.
And let's not forget the ubiquitous presence of predicate
felon, fed snitch, psycho-stalker Tim White, whom Janet also exposes in this
report (as well as in a number of others she has published). Targeted by Tim
White for his criminal harassment/menacing, felony threatening, stalking,
libel/slander, White was sicced on Janet Phelan by the very Ted Gunderson whom
Adachi so staunchly defends, come hell or high water.
So what in the bloody
hell is going on here?
I can tell you one thing
I know to be going on: that Ken Adachi is lying about the irrefutable fact
(supported by reams of evidence from numerous sources) of Tim White's longterm
involvement with Ted Gunderson, and that Gunderson exploited White for years as
a lackey, Town Crier and messenger boy, as part of a "deal" White made for a
get-out-of-jail-free card. In fact, Tim White and Ken Adachi, for years, acted
in collusion with a criminal conspiracy headed by Ted Gunderson, which included
various COINTELPRO tactics (of which Ted Gunderson was a
master).
But let me get to the
point of all this, which speaks to the issues which were the source of the
serious disagreement between me and Janet Phelan. The issues, at least for
me, were "trafficking with the devil", and not recognizing the limits of my
personal boundaries. Differences in
political ideology are one thing, but when these differences lead to personal
conflicts which negatively affect me, that is where I must draw the line.
I was told by Janet
Phelan that she had contacted Ken Adachi, some years ago, for the purpose of
making complaints against Tim White, who was being promoted on Adachi's website,
and in fact endorsed as a credible source by Adachi himself. Tim White's
outrageous lies (many of which were fed to him by Ted Gunderson) about any
number of people and subjects (including Barbara Hartwell) were
prominently featured on Educate-Yourself, and in fact remain there in the
archives to this day.
And more recently, I was
told by Janet Phelan that Adachi had contacted her by telephone, for the purpose
of getting information on Tim White, his former "associate". Adachi
has reversed his position on Tim White, whom he once vehemently defended against
so-called "attacks" from Barbara Hartwell (which in fact were reports EXPOSING
White's many crimes against persons), and supported him, including financially.
Now, Adachi is hell-bent on "exposing" the evils of Tim White, ironically the
same evils Adachi himself was (and still is) involved in.
During a telephone
conversation with Janet Phelan earlier this year, I was stunned to hear that she
actually told Ken Adachi that if he wanted information on Tim White, he could
get it from Barbara Hartwell! AS IF I would ever give the time of day to Ken
Adachi, a scum criminal, a diabolical liar, an enemy who has wreaked havoc in my
life for over a decade with his outrageous lies? Or AS IF Ken Adachi would
consider anything on MY website of value, considering that he himself has been
thoroughly exposed there, and in conjunction with Tim White as an
accomplice?
Why mention my name,
especially knowing what she did about Ken Adachi and his obsessive attempts to
destroy my personal/professional reputation, for over a decade?
Janet Phelan was very well aware of
the massive libel campaign against Barbara Hartwell, being waged by Ken Adachi,
and the extreme damages he had done to my personal/professional reputation, to
my livelihood, and my very life. I had also discussed the lies and crimes of Ken
Adachi with Janet Phelan on many occasions. When I told her, "He's a very bad
guy", her answer was, "I know."
So why then, was Janet
Phelan trafficking with this devil, even bringing up my name, and yet never
confronting Adachi with his outrageous lies, his egregious libel and slander
against a person (namely me) who was supposed to be her friend? Also, never
naming him as an accomplice (though she was well aware of this for years) of Ted
Gunderson, whom she publicly stated had tried to murder her?
It is not my place to
tell others (including my friends and associates) whom they should, or should
not, be talking to, even if those persons are my worst enemies. That is not my
business and I respect the right of others to have dealings with whomever they
choose. But the one thing I think I should be able to reasonably expect, is that
MY NAME will not be brought up by my friends in discussions with these devils;
and, that if my name is brought up by my enemies, that my friends will, out of
respect for me, refuse to discuss me, not as much a word. As in: This topic is
not open for discussion. This conversation is terminated. Case
closed.
Then, there is the issue
of why Janet Phelan would not protest that Ken Adachi is exploiting her material
and her name and using it on his site. I have seen numerous examples where Janet
has contacted editors/publishers of websites that were using her material, and
lets them know, in no uncertain terms, that she wants it REMOVED. One such case
was Rayelan Allan, publisher of Rumor Mill News. Janet made a number of
vehement complaints about her material being published on RMN, which were
forwarded to me by Janet, including her complaints that Tim White was posting on
another forum hosted by RMN, on which he was libeling Janet Phelan, (as well as
Barbara Hartwell, which was not mentioned).
In fact, I was given permission by
Janet to publish a report on this, which I did, on this website, for the
public record.
Knowing full well that
Adachi is running a massive libel/slander campaign against Barbara Hartwell, one
which in fact has resulted in extreme damages to me, why would she NOT make a
similar complaint asking Adachi to REMOVE all references to her name? AS IF she
accepts Adachi's "support" and promotion, without considering that maybe,
"silence is consent"?
NAZI
JEW-HATERS
Earlier this year, I had
been collaborating with Janet Phelan in doing a series of radio programs on the
subject of Nazi propagandists and Jew-haters in the "patriot" movement. Speaking
for myself, this has been an issue which I have addressed in my reports for many
years, as I despise any form of racism or bigotry. I can't speak for Janet, but
I do know that this issue is of great concern to her as well, especially
considering that she has been attacked by these "white supremacists", simply for
being "Jewish".
Janet and I appeared on
at least half a dozen shows, covering this topic, until the time when the
crucial disagreement put an end to our association.
In conjunction with these
radio shows, I had published some reports on my website, describing the attacks
on Janet and me which came from some of the Jew-haters/Nazis. (It should be noted
that I am not Jewish, but address this subject on principle.) One such report
described an attack on Janet while she was a guest on a radio program hosted by
Mike Harris, on RBN. The subject was not "Jews", but rather conservatorships,
which Janet had been investigating and covering in her articles and on radio
programs. Janet was attacked simply for being "Jewish", not an uncommon event on
RBN, where Jew-haters abound.
When I asked Janet, in a
telephone conversation, what she thought of the report, I was told that there
were a couple of issues to which she took exception. One was that I failed to
use an exact phrase which she said was a quote from one of the callers who
attacked her. Before I wrote the report, I insisted on hearing the program
myself, as it is my policy not to comment on anything which I have not
directly heard/read myself. I try to avoid using hearsay, when possible, even
if I consider the source credible, because it is my report, and it is my
reputation on the line if I am inaccurate.
At my request, Janet
provided me with the MP3 of the radio program. I listened to the entire program,
and more specifically, more than once, to the portion where Janet was attacked
by the Jew-hater caller. Since I did not hear the "exact phrase" cited by Janet,
I did not include it in the report. As I told Janet, I may have missed it, but
since I did not hear it myself, I was not about to use this quote, though I did
use others which were clearly audible.
But there was
also another issue which Janet made it clear she was very upset about. This
being that I had listed some "decent and honorable" talk show hosts (as opposed
to the Jew-haters/Nazis) who had brought us on their programs to discuss the
Jew-hater/Nazi propaganda and thanked them for the air time and opportunity. One
such host I listed was a person with whom Janet Phelan had a "problem", which
involved a private conflict, never made public, and which had nothing to do with
me. I won't name him, as I see no reason.
But the fact that I
listed this talk show host among the "decent and honorable", Janet took offense.
I explained that I personally had no problem with this person, and that he had
not publicly libeled or slandered Janet. But she then tried to compare my
listing of this host ("promoting" him) to the actions of another individual,
Chris Zucker, who had been promoting Ken Adachi on his website. Ken Adachi, the
unrepentant liar and criminal perp who has been running a massive libel campaign
against Barbara Hartwell for over a dozen years! And Chris Zucker, who aided and
abetted that libel campaign by promoting him. According to Janet, this was
comparable to me "promoting" a talk show host with whom she had a private
conflict.
I tried to explain that
the two issues were not comparable, but I was told only that she "didn't want to
argue about it", so I dropped it.
But I must state, for the
record, that in my opinion, and by my standards, this is like comparing a
sling-shot "attack" which takes place over the fence, in a private backyard,
unobserved by anyone, to the dropping of Hellfire Missiles on a Target under a
bright spotlight, who sustains massive injuries and damages. There simply is
no comparison! At least not by my way of thinking.
In any case, after
this conversation with Janet, I decided to delete my report from my website,
since I understood that Janet found at least parts of it offensive. She did not
ask me to delete it, but I thought it best, as I was trying to respect her
wishes, whether I agreed with her or not.
BUSYBODY/STALKER MICHELLE WOLVEN:
ATTACKS ON BARBARA HARTWELL
Michelle
Wolven, another minion of corrupt corporate entities (such as Big Pharma and the
Medical Mafia) and corrupt government agencies (including FDA) began her attacks
of libel/slander on Barbara Hartwell, promoting outrageous falsehoods, after I
appeared as a guest on Dr. Antonella Carpenter's radio program, The Medical
Conspiracy. Wolven, who had been viciously attacking Dr. Carpenter and
associates for years, later escalated her attacks on Barbara Hartwell by
harassing known associates of mine, and by sending a libelous letter to the
station manager of Orion Talk Radio, complaining that Barbara Hartwell was
allowed as a guest on Dr, Carpenter's program.
Samples of Wolven's
libel:
"I am extremely concerned because they [Dr.
Carpenter and Lase Med Inc.] have taken a crazy and dangerous turn in their
tactics. That, having a fraudulent person claiming to be
ex-CIA..."
"Ms. Carpenter has Barbara Hartwell coming
on the Medical Conspiracy radio show now 4 or 5 times saying that she is now "
MY ENEMY" because I am the enemy of Ms. Carpenter of Lase Med
Inc."
In both cases, these demonic characters,
Adachi and Wolven, have made a very PUBLIC spectacle with their scandal mongering
in defaming the name of Barbara Hartwell --of which any and all associates,
friends, colleagues of mine are well aware.
This report will continue in addressing the
issues of respecting the privacy and personal boundaries of the Individual, when
confronted with the malicious invasions, intrusions and assaults on any given
Individual by evildoers such as Adachi and
Wolven.
It will explore the difference between what
is "private" and what is "public".
NOTE: In several separate attempts to post this
report, the second part has failed to appear on the page correctly displayed.
There has been a malfunction of unknown origin in formatting. So I will try to post the
second part separately as Part 2. To be
continued...
